so is jerry nadler.rs the house judiciary committee. >> strikes the entire immigration title and the employment investments in our human infrastructure that it makes. therefore i encourage opposition to the amendment. >> if the chairman would indulge me, i'd like to know if he just used the term "human infrastructure" to refer to the portion of the bill that he seeks to strike with his amendment. >> i did. >> so, illegal immigration is now human infrastructure? i don't know what to say. >> tucker: that was congressman thomas massie, and he is absolutely right. it is true and obvious to anyone who actually reads the amnesty bill. under the biden administration's plan, several categories of illegal aliens will get green cards, meaning they will be allowed to live in this country, get full citizenship, and be allowed to vote for democrats. one of the groups that will receive green cards includes "essential workers." this at a time when we have an employment crisis. but what are essential workers exactly? it

did you hear the compassion in jerry nadler's voice? real compassion for serial criminal offenders as long as they are coming here illegally. he does not have compassion for you. sos the minute that you break e law that jerry nadler and the democratic party would like to enforce, the ones they tell you what you can do with your own body and what job you can have, what you can say in public, that you are not human infrastructure, you are a criminal. here is the senate majority leader explaining we need a crackdown at the border, not because illegal aliens are fentanyl, fake vaccine cards coming from mexico. that is the real threat. >> and the problem is this. fake covid cards. and they are coming in large amounts and large bunches through ports of entry. is this an epidemic right now? no.. could it become one? absolutely, if the authorities do nothing about it, so we have to nip it in the body. our border patrol, our customs, and our fbi can go all out with inspections and confiscate any of these cards that come in. today, i am urging a

amy: that w your congress member jerry nadler who represented the ground zero area, chairing the meetingine todd whitman being questioned by democratic congressmember debbie wasserman schultz. before we go to break and hear the story of joe zadroga, whose name is on the law -- i don't think you know the details. juan, your comment on what christine todd whitman was saying and the information that was being suppressed from the highest levels, nadler would go on to say that she and america's mayor, mayor giuliani, should be tried for criminally negligent -- criminal negligence? juan: i think it is important to recall the role of rudy giuliani as well because you see the epa was a monitoring agency. the federal agency that should have assured the protection of all the people at ground zero was osha. the occupational safety health administration. osha deliberely did not enforce its standards for working on a dangerous site like that because giuliani insisted that he was in charge. he was the incident commander on the pile, and he maintained his control of all information and all activity at

took jerry nadler four months to go to court on don mcgawn. second of all, if you're arguing this case you have to stress to the judge we need expedited review and some of the responsibility falls on judges as well. judges control their own dockets. judges can decide which cases are the most important and if you have a case that involves a showdown between congress and the white house, i believe a federal judge really ought to move that to the very top of the pile. >> eli honig and melanie zanona, thanks very much. >> thanks. >>> breaking news from the u.s.-mexico border. the migrant camp where as many as 12,000 migrants were once living under a texas bridge is now clear clear. you can see in the drone photo. josh campbell is there on scene. fill us in, josh. >> yeah, the breaking news here from del rio after several days of living in the squalid conditions and you the del rio international bridge which, of course, closed, the last of the migrants have left. our team was just down there. i saw the last remnants of these migrants, the last doze

we have nancy pelosi adam shift, jerry nadler, the squad, how in the heck are they not outraged overtraged usa is not diminished by the actions of this administration and the dishonesty? this is for a more perfect union but it seems it's about unbridled devices power. the fact that they did not condemn rioting and killing americans, violence and murder with falsehood after falsehood to attack the biden caused global calamity. >> they have no moral compass. the word of america doesn't mean anything to them how are we as a country abandoned americans and special afghans who worked with us for over 20 years side-by-side with our troops and other government agencies and left everybody there? it is unbelievable. that will not go away. is much as they wanted to it's not. >> thank you for joining us i have a good labor day weekend. im elizabeth mcdonald. you are watching the evening at it on foxbusiness. join us again next week. >> welcome everybody welcome to kudlow i am david asman a dismal jobs report released today 235,000 jobs added in august economist were expecting a number three tim

i just want to get at this we've got nancy pelosi weave eric swalwell, adam schiff, jerry nadler, theed by the actions of this administration and the dishonesty that's going on. this is forming a more perfectst union but it seems to them it's about obtaining an divisive power. the fact that the fine with this and they're not condemned writing, looting and arson and criminal illegal killing american and violent and murder and on ali national scale while focusing also after falsehood to attack the people in the rivals sitting across the people when you have abiding caused global calamity, your final word. >> they have no moral compass, the word of america doesn't mean anything to them. how we as a country has abandoned americans in special immigrant visa afghans who worked with us for over 20 years, side-by-side with her troops and other government agencies and left everybody there is just unbelievable. that is not going to go away as much as they wanted to go away it is not. elizabeth: thank you for joining us we hope you have a good labor day weekend and for the rest of the viewers we

you signed onto a letter by jerry nadler to the attorney general asking, we write to ask you to use theof the department of justice to defend a woman's constitutional right to defend abortion are right now under assault by texas senate bill 8. what do you want the attorney general to do? and do you believe the united states congress would take severe pushing by the president of the united states should also try to codify roe v wade? >> yes. to answer your first question, i want the department of justice to do everything within its legal authority to stop these so-called bounty hunters from going out and suing people who are simply trying to exercise their reproductive rights. i want the united states congress to pass a statute in both the house, where i believe we will do that as we've been doing with so many other pieces of legislation, but more critically in the senate to codify roe v wade among other things. that requires, as you know, john, making an exception to or getting rid of entirely the filibuster. that is why i've repeatedly called on the president to take a public position

judiciary committee chairman jerry nadler of new york and 23 other house democrats wrote in a letterrge you to take legal action up to and including the criminal prosecution of would-be evgeny lan tees attempting to use the private action of blatant constitutional law. >>> it follows an essay in the washington over the weekend by lawrence tribe who wrote, if texas wants to empower private vigilantes to intimidate abortion providers from serving women, why not make bounty hunters twice before engaging in that intimidation? "the new york times" writes the justice department responded to democrats by referring to garland's monday statement that the d.o.j. is, quite, urgently exploring all options to challenge the law. >>> an fbi intelligence analyst warned on november 9th, just days after the 2020 election, that stop the steal rallies could descend into the type of violence the nation saw at the capitol on january 6. politico reports the e-mail came from an analyst at the fbi's school for bomb technicians and urged recipients to, quote, keep your head on a swivel. according to politico,

them $10,000 if they're successful. 23 house democrats led by house judiciary committee chairman jerry nadlero attorney general merrick garland requesting he use the full power of the justice department to protect a woman's right to choose and to combat that pernicious provision. they write this, quote. we urge you to take legal action up to and including the criminal prosecution of would be vigilantes attempting to use the private right of action established by that blatantly unconstitutional law. what we've heard from the attorney general so far was a statement released the day before that letter was sent from house democrats. it reads in part, quote, the department will provide support from federal law enforcement when an abortion clinic or reproductive health center is under attack. we will not tolerate violence against those seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services. this turning of texas residents into bounty hunters is where the legal battles against the law could be fought. that's according to lawrence tribe, professor of constitutional law emeritus at harvard law scho

judiciary chairman jerry nadler of new york, and 23 house democrats wrote a letter to garland that readspart, we urge you to take legal action up to and including the criminal prosecution of would be vigilantes attempting to use the private right of action established by that blatantly unconstitutional law. joining us now, reporter of the story, "new york times" reporter, msnbc national security analyst, michael schmidt. what recourse does the justice department have here? this is a law on the books in the state of texas. what can merrick garland do about it? >> as we point out in our story, the administration officials and legal experts basically were saying in the past few days that there are not a lot of great options. there are not a lot of clear options. there are not a lot of things that this president and this justice department can do to really push back on this texas law. there have been a lot of different theories that have been put out there. there was an op-ed in the "washington post" over the weekend by lawrence tribe that proposed using a law similar to the one that nadler

jerry nadler suggested it.t a new coin talking about a platinum coin that would raise money that would put -- be put directly into the u.s. treasury that would bail us out for about another 15 minutes. ainsley: continuously on the hamster wheel. run out of money and they create more money. we are spending so much money. that's republicans problem with green plans, green energy investment. social spending program. freer free college for illegal immigrants. your tax also go up. corporation taxes up to 28% they are suggesting. brian: so you have the tent cereal. i know it gets confusing. debt ceiling doesn't group. that's why the market went down yesterday. they have to work something out. other thing percolating through the house the bipartisan bill of 1.2 trillion. 560 billion of new money which was agreed on and you would think they would be doing it yesterday aoc says i'm not signing off on that. yesterday bernie sanders that series of tweets says i'm not doing 1.2 trillion. unless you give me 3.5 trillion. jo

there are others who -- jerry nadler wants to have a coin, a $1 trillion coin. that doesn't require congressional action. we talked about an array of things. right now, we have to raise the debt ceiling. one more question. reporter: are you disappointed you have to -- that it's taking longer than you thought it would be? >> my disappointed? i thought we were on a path. everybody said, well, you said you were going to do this. yeah, we had a commitment. we were on a path with a number, $3.5 trillion. and that's how we wrote our bills. all of our committees of jurisdiction participated in writing their bills on saturday, and everybody worked on schedule. that's what i was so excited about. everybody was on schedule. so the -- by september 15, the bills were finished. by saturday, it was marked up by the budget committee, but we're still operating at the $3.5 trillion. then, there was an intervention, as you know, within the past week, 10 days saying, well, we can't go there because of the -- so we'll see what that is. and hopefully it will measure -- it will reach