. - and so the kinds of ways in which technology, we're not talking about jetsons stuff like pods flying through the air. we are talking about congestion easing, right? we're talking about ways to redirect people from using their traditional methods of getting from point-to-point, to address the environmental consequences of the old ways. - yes, to put it in plain terms, i think we're going from the feather pen, to the computer in transportation. if you think about the fact that we use analytics in transportation to try to figure out why a particular road is congested today, and it wasn't congested yesterday, but the possibility the analytics will actually tell us why, and actually give us a range of options for how to solve for that predicatively. i think those are the types of things that technology and innovation are gonna give cities to be able to deal with all this growth-- - so you're not getting any pushback from the states that resist being told what to do by the federal government, this is more of a city relationship with the department and the cities can choose to opt-in or not

. >> i want to two to jetson and patrick. your bernie supporters. running out of room to lockup the nomination. he could be pushed out. if hilary is the nominee can you get behind her? >> that's the longest lever i ever pulled. >> you mean to vote for her would be the longest lever you ever pulled. >> i'm in the same vote. >> that's not voting pr pro hillary, that's voting no trump. >> but you would pull it. it would take both hands. >> i might need my friend to come in and help. >> so hillary clinton has been saying gun owners support my policies when it comes to gun safety and it appears from that evidence they do but reluctantly. >> they do that here tony as you said very are you lureluctantly do you think is balancing it out for gun owners? >> when you're a democrat and you own guns you believe that the second amendment is a right and you want to keep it and there's moderate steps that could be taken to sure up the safety question. there's the assault weapons ban and there's also of course the gun show loophole. we'll be hearing a lot more about

the first vision of smart home started appearing and that trickled in divisions in the 1960s of the jetsonslt disney and the notion of these pushbutton automated phones that would relieve us of drudgery, but in the 80s is that tech come he's like microsoft and others pushing this idea that the future of computing was the smart home, home of tomorrow and filled with these visions of how we would automate our homes. consumers never really wanted them. we saw this elaborate push to create elaborate interoperable homes and of course they were buggy and brittle and taking great analog systems and make them harder to use. the real problem with smart homes separate from hacking is the notion we all remember in the early '90s when it was-- we could even make the computers worked our printers and the question is do you want your house to work the way. this led to consumers not embracing it and if you have seen the press release out there, poland 9000 people around the world asking about their appetite for smart homes and the american in the study who live with the vision the longest, 45% could see n

we are not talking about this as sort of a futurist, jetsons type future. we are talking about the future of transportation safety. we think that our message to lawmakers and policy makers around the country will be very clear and our hope is that we can get these cars to every person that wants one. >> you talked about the technology being, i would argue, probably available sooner than many people might imagine. >> it is. >> what year do you think this would be available at scale? >> well, it's going to really be in a variety of sort of methodologimetho methodologi methodologies. in terms of people owning a self-driving car it's farther out. when you talk about super cities, new york city, san francisco, places with high congestion, we can easily see a handful of years where these types of choices will be available. we want to make sure they are available. >> do they require their own lanes, for example? >> not necessarily. the technology really can drive independently without having an independent lane. i think on the other hand, there are some people thi

. >> anthony: the jetsons. you know? >> roy choi: yeah, maybe not yours. you like it?hing you like here. >> anthony: wow. there's so much i don't know. [ chuckles ] anything.w how to covert even a ufh2o. [man] that's not good. [pilot] that's not good. [man] that's really not good. [burke] it happened august fourteenth,2008, and we covered it.talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ the call just came in. she's about to arrive. and with her, a flood of potential patients. a deluge of digital records. x-rays, mris. all on account...of penelope. but with the help of at&t, and a network that scales up and down on-demand, this hospital can be ready. giving them the agility to be flexible & reliable. because no one knows & like at&t. what aremaking a cake!ht now? ayla reminds me of like a master chef and emiana reminds me of like a monster chef. uh oh. i don't see cake, i just see mess. it's like awful. it feels like i am not actually cleaning it up what's that make mommy do? (doorbell) what's

it was like fred flintstone walk into an episode of the jetsons. people were scraping and cell phone technology and the internet like the internet didn't exist when i went to prison turkey was a thing just getting started. so, i came out to a very different reality than the one i left's and the reason i say it was beautifully scary is because while i have absolutely loved walking out of prison, realized that we were in a lot of trouble in this country when it comes to the men and women coming home because we are not preparing properly for their reintroduction into the world. so, had a little whole lot of stuff relatively quickly. fortunately, i am a relatively smart person, but the scary part about this that i know that a lot of the men and women incarcerated have third-grade reading and math skills, so that's a scary thing when we think about that we are not preparing people for life out of prison. that's one of the reasons-- >> host: i want to correct one thing you said. you said you were relatively smart person. you are a brilliant man and i thi

manhattan in 1870, but the idea was just a novelty then, and has remained in the realm of george jetsonam-o- vision ever since. but in 2013, this white paper changed the equation. it's a technical description of a supersonic hyperloop that would carry people from los angeles to san francisco in about 30 minutes. a proposal like this would normally be dismissed, but the author was the real life iron man; elon musk, the founder of paypal, electric car manufacturer tesla and spacex, the private company that launches rockets into low earth orbit and lately, lands the spent first stages onto small barges in one piece. >> elon has his way of making everybody excited about these seemingly outlandish ideas, but we have all the technology there to do it. it's just, you need the excitement, you need some funding behind it and you need people to push it and elon is the pusher. >> reporter: at that award ceremony in college station, texas, the pusher surprised his pushees with an appearance-- he got a rocket star welcome from his biggest fans. it was nerd nirvana. >> it's clear that the public and

that trickled into the 1960s with the jetsons, the 6465 world fair, walt disney, the notions of thesepushbutton homes that would relieve us from drudgery but by the 1980s you saw the big tech companies like microsoft were pushing this idea that the future of computing was the smart home, home of tomorrow and was filled with all these stillborn visions of how we basically would automate our homes. consumers never really wanted them and it was only in this elaborate push to create these interoperable network homes and of course they were brittle , they were funky, taking great and on systems and making them harder to use. the real problem with smart homes is different from hacking and everything else is just the notion that we all remember that time in the early 1990s when it was on that we couldn't make our computers work without printers. the question is, do you want your house to operate the same way? consumers never seem to embrace it. until security which you might have seen the press release, pulled 9000 people around the world, ask them about their appetite for smart homes and 45

. >> i'm sort of with greg on the whole vision of the smart home with the jetsons. i want to know where my fine car is. [laughter] >> and but seriously, if you look at cars in the highway safety institute and all the testing they do, until there is some entity that actually tests, i'm not talking about standards, right, that are quote voluntary, talking about people crash things or do the equivalent for the iot, how -- the consumers will never really know what is safe and what isn't until this actual testing, and so in order to accelerate something like that, josh, you were talking about liability. you know, if you look at places like the mayo clinic who have imposed liability on their vendors, you know, if your software fails and there's a breach, you're liable. >> through contract. >> through contract, unless there's a consumer movement to demand liability on the manufacturer whose bringing something into my home that has this vulnerability known, then -- then i don't -- without those two things, i'm not sure that, you know, just relying on the goodwill of manufac

which is better than what you saw in the jetsons when you were a kid. george had to steer that. the hoped-for flying car is the one where you would open the app on your phone and say i want to fly from new haven, connecticut to boston, massachusetts and punch in the address and a robotic car would come to your house and you would get in it and there would be no steering wheel. they would be no steering whatsoever. the car would go to an agreed-upon launch place and take off and fly robotically to boston and land and drive you to your location. flying cart these companies are shooting for. host: we're talking with jack hitt from smithsonian magazine. questionst to ask about what these cars look like and how they will operate and the regulatory issues and other things involved come you can call and ask our guest directly. you can also post on our website and facebook and twitter page. in this video, it seems that will have tordles be conquered to make these more mainstream. guest: there is a competition between the driverless car which happens on the ground in the flying car which

his supporters targeting clinton a lie, democratic party chair debbie wasserman shut who could be jetson just before the convention according to the hill. com. as clinton supporters try to ease tensions with the sanders camp. >> why on earth would we elect somebody president who actually wrote it for the collapse of the mortgage market? >> who the hill doesn't? who doesn't? >> we lost him. he froze. he looks stunned. i was stunned at governor martinez of new mexico didn't show up. kind of dissing donald trump, because a lot of people wanted her to be the vp for him. not any more. that's over. that's out. >> she was on the short list. >> she is on no list now. 7 15. >> new information on the death of extreme sports legend, dave mere a. doctors have concluded that the bmx ride her the brain disease known as cte. >> concussions, basically, yes, dave took his own life in greenville, north carolina back in february when he shot himself. cte is short for chronic traumatic encephalopathy. basically a concussion. which has been tied to repeated brain trauma, hitting your head too many times asso

. >> i'm with greg on the smart home with the jetsons and i want to know where my flying car is. [laughter] but seriously, if you look at cars in the highway safety institute i and all the testing they do, until there is some entity that actually tasks -- not talking about standards that are voluntary but talking about people that crash in the equivalent -- how -- the consumers will never really know what is safe and what isn't until the actual testing. and so, in order to accelerate something like that, you were talking about liability. if you were looking at places like the mayo clinic, you have closed liability on the vendors. if your software fail software e is a beach, you are liable through contract. unless there is a consumer movement to demand liability on the manufacture who's bringing something into my home that has this vulnerability that is known, then without those two things i'm not sure that's just relying on the goodwill of manufacturers to do the right thing because we know that is simply not going to happen to push the product out the door with no volatilities b

. >> elroy jetson. >> this is an area where nasa doesn't get enough credit because the iss and to a certainxtent ames and other centers have really pushed the ball forward on the small sat front. and through iss has been sort of seeding the small sat market. but you can't launch into all the different orbits frichlt ss. what we'll able to do with our vehicle launcher 1 is to put the satellites into other orbits. but what i think is interesting is the u.s. is now leading a new area which is the small satellite sector and you know, we're going to see tremendous growth. the geostationary -- the number of geostationary satellites getting launched into orbit isn't really growing right now. but you're going to see this huge growth in small satellite constellations over the coming years that will establish essentially a new information skin for planet earth. that helps us with navigation and communication and weather and remote sensing. i think it will be eventually a permanent new skin around the planet. a lot of that is being catalyzed by the work that was done inside nasa labs and now inside th

which is better than what you saw in the jetsons when you were a kid. george had to steer that. hoped-for flying car is the one where you would open the app on your phone and say i want to fly from new haven, connecticut to boston, massachusetts and punch in the address and a robotic car would come to your house and you would get in it and there would be no steering wheel. they would be no steering whatsoever. the car would go to an agreed-upon launch place and take off and fly robotically to boston and land and drive you to your location. flying cart these companies are shooting for. host: we're talking with jack hitt from smithsonian magazine. questionst to ask about what these cars look like and how they will operate and the regulatory issues and other things involved come you can call and ask our guest directly. you can also post on our website and facebook and twitter page. in this video, it seems that will have tordles be conquered to make these more mainstream. guest: there is a competition between the driverless car which happens on the ground in the flying car which hap

really appreciate it's a grind and so you're taken the southern waterfront in the flint stones to the jetsonsity on the grid and i like that and because when you have a group of people the left hand knows what the right hand is doing. >> thank you, mike and others for working i hope you'll get back in front of us i want to see you before the end of the year this is exciting how things workout and korea run and they are going to be because you taking did community with you that's good we're asking for transparency and supportive i mean that is awesome so hopefully, we'll get to see you guys before the end of the year and thank you for your involvement in the pasha project that is so good for district 10 and the residents you were not here at the last meeting but i'm hoping that a lot of the young kids can put down their guns and make a contributions and appreciate what you said about affordable housing being this is the most expensive city to live in and you consider the transportation i know that commissioner vice president brandon has issues i know one of the questions she asked elaine what