so working with matt lee and john katz, they're aware of the items. we know we're tracking the ocs, but there's no concern that it will be ready for june 16th at this point. >> okay. so it looked like in the photo the ocs itself was already up, at least one part. >> there's -- >> but getting power to it? >> the picture i showed you that's on the south side, there's actually -- those are outside the awning and they don't need a trough. the ones on the -- the one on the north side where the number five is running today, that has to actually have a trough. that's where the trough gets installed. >> okay. but not just the hardware, but the power we expect to be there? >> the power is there. the power will be there. the traction power element, which is a redundant increase for more reliability, but i've been firmed and i've asked that question. the traction power which will be happening in a parallel path is not needed for the operation of the bus plaza itself. there's enough power there to run the bus plaza without the traction power upgrades. >> okay. gr

katz. it was made by john s. martin jr, an assistant to the solicitor general. the reason, as we said was thoroughgood marshall was being nominated to the court. there was a turnover in the solicitor general's office. we listen to his responding to questions from justice byron white. >> we are dealing with something different. it is our position that even if this court were to say that they were entitled to some degree of protection under the fourth amendment, that it is not a protection that comes to a house. a public phone booth is more to a public field than it is to a home. and it party in a public phone booth has no right to expect he is subject to all the protections in a private house. we submit that was done here was not indiscriminate search and seizure, it was a very careful -- it was carefully limited to only involving one particular petitioner. in this case come innocent members of the public were not subject to surveillance. theagents testified that stereo had two tracks, a and b. they did not listen to the conversations of the innocent party. is a

katz. it was made by john f martin junior.hurgoodn as we said, marshall was being nominated to the court so there was a turnover in the office. we will listen as he is responding to questions from justice byron. >> we are dealing with a public phone booth. we are dealing with something different. it is our position that even if this court was to save public phone wasn't headed to some protection under the fourth amendment, it is not protection that comes to a house. public phone booth is more appropriate. a party any public phone that has no right to expect he would be in court. we submit to what was done here was not an indiscriminate search condemned by this court. it was a very careful -- it was carefully limited. only involving the particular petitioner and that -- in this case. one instance, which has happened and the agents testify that the tape and quarter involved was a stereotype that had two tracks. they could control which conversations they would listen to and they did not listen to the conversation of the innocent

katz. it was made by john k. martin jr. he was assistant to the solicitor generally.hurgood marshall was being nominated to the court. so there was a turnover in the solicitor general's phil:. he is responding questions to justice byron white. >> we are dealing with a public phone booth. we are dealing with something different. it is our position that even if he court would say the phone is entitled to some sort of protection, it is not the same protection as to a house. a party in a public phone booth that has no right to expect that he is going to be afforded all the protections he would be in a private house. we submit that what was done here was not an indiscriminate search ago producer as was condemn the by this court in irvine. -- the agents testified that the tape reported involved with the stereotype had two tracks, a and w. they would control which conversations they would listen to, and they did not listen to the conversation of innocent party. >> mr. martin, what did you seize? you say this was a reasonable search of a what? >> well, what i would say >> mr.

katz. it was made by john s martin junior. he was assistant to --. he was been nominated to the court. there was a turnover in the general's office. we will listen as he is responding to questions from justice byron white. >> we are dealing with a public phone booth. we are dealing with something different. it's our position that you and if the court would say, public phone booth is entitled to some degree protection under the fourth amendment, it's not the same as going to a house. a public phone booth is not akin to a house. a party in the phone booth cannot expect that he will be afforded detections like you would be in a house. what we have done here was not an indiscriminate search and seizure. this was a very carefully limited one. it was only involving particular petitioner, in this case, incident members of the public were not subject to surveillance. the only one instance that's happened that was testified to the tape recorder involved was a sere owe type, had two tapes a and b, and they did not in fact listen to the conversation of the innocent party. >> what did you see? you

john f. kennedy and clamps down on wiretapping and suggests it should be outlawed and berger v. new york and katz, k-a-t-z, versus the united states. wiretaps have to file the same procedures for the warrant and there must be probable cause and people initiating the wire trap have to specify the crime they're investigating and specify the place to be searched and specify the conversations to be seized in 1968, congress follows suit and sets specific steps. they will target other confrontational political groups including the black panther party which it helps to destroy with informants and misinformation and violence, and the american indian movement which ends with a violent 1971 siege that wounded in south dakota and the fbi will also go after the new left and the ku klux klan successfully undermined to some degree which we'll talk about the discussion and then in 1975, watergate, revelations in "the new york times" and government spying led by senator frank church. someone managed to break into fbi headquarters somewhere and grabd who grabbed a whole bunch of documents and they realized they h