john podesta. this is the email that john podesta received. it was sent by the main intelligence director of the kremlin. we are talking about real people , they like to kill people overseas. that the person tried to break into the account from ukraine. then said you guys are hilarious. this is a redirector that sends him to a site google -- accounts.net. when he got there, it was a perfect looking google login. he asked one of the i.t. people at the dnc whether this was legit or not. apparently that guy replied it looks ok but meant to say it does not look ok. that would be the most important typo in history of the him and race. gives theto that and password, the gr you goes. they broke into the dnc using more for -- technically sophisticated work than this. when they had that information, they were not releasing fake accounts. they were not releasing fake information, a cherry picked the emails that told the story they wanted to tell. that was the story that bernie sanders was ripped off in the dnc primary. to do so, they put that message th

john podesta's email.agan, ronald reagan. >> you are carrying water for the kremlin. >> tucker: you are sitting there, you are on the intel committee and you can't say that they hacked -- >> you're going to have to move your show to russian television. >> tucker: he would not say it because he knew that it was not true. and now there is accumulating evidence that it wasn't true. or that russia did not do that. it's not defensive russia, it's a fact. the fbi never inspected the dnc servers for evidence of russian hackers. you know the story, but in a declassified testimony, they admitted that there was no proof that russia did that. julian assange has always denied that they got him the email. and here's something very odd. the muellerr team never interviewed julian massage.ue he wanted to be interviewed, but they didn't. t why not? you know why, because the truth was never the point. glenn greenwald cofounded the inter-sap. we disagree probably on a lot politically, but from day one he has taken an enormou

elizabeth: newly-released house intelligence documents reveal that top clinton official john podestaed under oath at the dnc and the hillary campaign did in fact split the cost, 50/50 of the now debunked steele dossier used by the fbi to launch the trump russia probe. that dossier was created by christopher steele, whose own sources told the fbi that steele embellishes and can't be trusted. the cia called it internet rumor. the doj inspector general says it has russian disinformation in it. that is what the democrats paid for. bring in former independent counsel ken starr. great to have you back on. your reaction on podesta here? >> liz, thank you. the more we learns worse it gets for the clinton campaign and the dnc and shame on then. at least john podesta is an honest person who testified under oath what we really knew, this was political campaign stuff which never should have been used by the fbi, and it launched 1000 ships. it launched all of this destruction which continues to this very day, and so, it is better to know than not to know but shame on them for having done this to

but at least john podesta whon s an honest person has testified under oath.we really knew which is, this was political campaign stuff, which never should've been used by the fbi and it launched 1000ll ships, it launcd all the destruction which continues to this very day. it is better to knoww the not to know but shame on them for having done this to begin with and relying on the steele dossier to again launch the russia probe affecting carter page and others as well as now the latest clear victim, it all fits together. liz: at the same time what was also damaging, republicans and the administration say our media leaks, obama officials going on the air on tv saying trump is a russian asset. in constant media leaks coming out of the fbi, now house intelligence documents, new disclosures show the same obama officials, rather going on the air saying all of that, behind-the-scenes and behind close doors saying we have no evidence of trump russia collusion, watch jesse watters break this down. listen. >> vladimir putin, he knows how to handle an asset and that's wh

it was rooted in thousands of leaked emails and that set of emails, emails from john podesta's personalil account were stolen by russia and given to wikileaks in london. that was the story. anyone who questioned it was attacked. when we asked a question about it, adam schiff himself suggested we must be russian agents. >> look right into the camera and say i know for a fact that vladimir putin was behind the attack, hacks. >> absolutely. >> tucker: and john podesta's email. >> i think that ronald reagan will be rolling over in his grave. >> you will have to show it to rt russian television. spiel and so he wouldn't say because he knew it wasn't true. and now there's a committing evidence to the fact that it wasn't true. let russia didn't do that. the fbi never directly inspected the dnc's servers for evidence of russian hackers, they took the word of a private company called crowd strike. but in the recently classified testimony, there is no proof that russia did that. julian assange has always denied that russian hackers got him the emails. and yet here's something very on it, audit, t

elizabeth: you know john podesta testified behind closed doors to house intelligence that fusion gps,ele dossier, was quote, interested in trying to raise more money to continue fusion's investigation into russian interference and then another campaign official for hillary clinton testified that they talked about the steele dossier. you know, here's the other thing here, so hillary clinton and her campaign never really stopped campaigning against trump after she lost. i mean this is an unprecedented effort critics say. her campaign helped fund, push into the media now debunked dossier that trump secretly colluded with moscow to sabotage her white house ambitions. >> like i said this whole thing, the more we find out, the worse it gets, it wouldn't surprise me quite frankly, if the house continues down this road. they set up the oversight committee, pelosi's oversight committee to investigate trump's handling of the coronavirus. now, i'm sitting in, actually in a phone booth, outside after rules committee hearing which i've been in since 11:00 a.m. this morning, and they're going to pa

that's john poe -- john podesta's testimony.direct knowledge of what ultimately became known as the steele dossier. you should add her. if you're going to addwiden and obama to the -- biden and obama to the witness list, we should ask mrs. clinton as well. did she authorize the leaking of information that christopher steele and glenn simpson did at the end of the came pain to -- campaign to smear trump, because we know that was russian disinformation now. lou: russia disinformation, and the deep state, the radical dems and all of the conspirators in the effort to overthrow this president were perfectly aligned with russian disinformation and the vigorous campaign it was carrying out. could that possibly be an accident in your best judgment, john solomon? >> i -- when i first came to town, i met this wily old senator who was a democrat, and he told me -- he gave me two pieces of advice; follow the money wherever or it goes, and two, there are no coincidences in washington. i'm going to the take his advice and say this can't be a

. >> tucker: but we don't have evidence that they did attack the dnc servers or john podesta's emailsso how exactly did russia skew the election or interfere any more than a dozen other countries tried to interfere every day? i'm totally confused. >> no, i think those are two separate inquiries. i don't think they impacted the results of the impact don't like the election at all. donald trump won fair and square. the senate wrote a report. i don't think, there is not much on the intelligence of did russia try to interfere. >> be when there is with me, there is with me. lots of countries interfere all the time. i want to know, is there any evidence that they hacked the dnc server. that is a central allegation and we are hearing, there is no evidence. and so i don't know what this is about. >> well, we couldn't answer that because remember the fbi did not gain access to that server. they didn't even try to gain access to the server. but the dnc gave it to crowd strike and we will never know the answer to that question. i think whether or not to sow seeds of discord i think our report di

the list is extensive, it's james comey, john brennan, loretta lynch, also john podesta.anding thehe nsa un-- yu know, finding out who demanded that the nsa unmask the president, his children, donald j. and ivanka trump, jared kushner, kellyanne conway and others. usually you unmask if people are doing -- talking to foreign governments. it's unclear if that was happening with these individuals or if this is just, you know, unmasking for political opposition purposes. what's your, what's your take on that? what's going on there? >> i think we'll are that revealed. --- have that reveale. i think the big essence of what you said, 53, that is so many. it means it goes deep and broadly into an institution that we should expect differently of it. and thank goodness lindsay is bringing it to the forefront. if there really are are that many individuals involved where you immediatete to find out and even if it gets down to a small fraction of it, that's significant. the american public ought to be concerned about that. that is really the deep state kind of run amok, and it's time,