so for me, it's like an intelligent story and characters and john rosen, i mean history that spread on that sheet of thousands of years. and for me all of the about is decorations. and then there is north hampton paris. to me, it seems like it's the only real character in the book. is it you? well, that is possibly true. the boroughs is certainly the foremost character in the book is created. all of the of the characters are created made. it created many of the real characters are in jerusalem and most of them are real or thing other than the obviously fantastic characters or the angels and demons and all the rest of it. um, there are only 2 might of characters in the whole book of characters. lo, tommy mangle, the cat. he was real. um the little ghost girl who's got the a feather boa might have dead rabbits where she real, she was real here in your life. oh, interviewed her as an older lady. she was the mother of one of my good friends. i went round there and she told me all about how they used to collect rabbit skins, from the streets in the boroughs, and then take them up to a place

and john rosen, i mean history that spread on that sheet of thousands of years. and for me, all of their bow is decorations. and then there is north hampton nurse. to me, it seems like it's the only real character in the book is that you well, that is possibly true. the birth is certainly the foremost character in the book is created. all of the, of the characters it created made it created. many of the real characters are in jerusalem and most of them are real. i think other than the obviously fantastical characters or the angels and the humans and all the rest of it. so there are only 2 might of characters in the whole book of characters, lot tommy mangle, the cat, he was real. so the, the little ghost girl who's got the about my.

rosen and that's jeffrey clark. the latest now on the investigation. the question now is if the defiance continues, what does the committee do? >> well, john, they are giving us every indication that they are not going to waste any time and begin the process of filing criminal contempt charges against those that they feel are not complying. the question is who falls into that category of being worthy of a criminal contempt referral at this stage and who are they going to continue to negotiate with? and i think we're going to see that play out through the course of today. of course, this was supposed to be the day that steve bannon, the former trump white house counsellor, a fire brand conservative commentator and a trump booster and big booster of the big lie of the election results and carb patel, the former dod official at the pentagon on the day of january 6th, were supposed to appear before the select committee for private depp stations. now, we believe neither of the men will show. we know in fact carb patel is not going to show and steve bannon has made it through communications with his lawyers that he's planning to defy the subpoen

john ratcliffe to look into it. in a dramatic three-hour oval office meeting on january 3rd, trump said he wanted to make clark acting attorney general. rosen told the committee that trump said, quote, one thing we know is you, rosen, aren't going to do anything to overturn the election. trump was then told that every senior doj official would resign if he went through with his plan, as well as white house counsel pat cipollone, who said trump's plan amounted to a murder/suicide pact. reluctantly, trump backed down. i spoke to three people present for that extraordinary meeting in the oval office. i am told that once trump realized that he would face mass resignations at the justice department and simply could not fire rosen that he turned over to the dejected and rejected stewart clark and he asked rosen what are you going to do to him now? and rosen said, there are no hard feelings, you are the only one who can fire him. so, george, after jeffrey clark tried and failed to engineer a coup at the justice department, he kept his job. >> jon, extraordinary reporting there. sowing pretty clearly the president is doing everything he thought he

john eastman who presented to the president and vice president. and we know that he said to mr. donahue, i don't expect you -- so jeffrey rosenhat. just say that the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the republican congressmen. at other points, trump names names, jim jordan republican of ohio who he describes as a fighter. he names other names, representative scott perry, republican of pennsylvania, who at the time promoted the idea that the election was stolen there trump. and he mentions senator ron johnson of wisconsin who trump praised for, quote respect getting to the bottom of things. it is unclear what things those are. but you have names, you have a path, you want to know if those men were complicit in an attempt to overturn the result of the election. >> surely, of course. and it is good to be with you, nicolle. i think those notes are staggering and of course the conversations that they reveal equally staggering. i think that the fact that the select committee is interviewing mr. donahue is an important development, really important step. we know that the department of justice was weaponized or at le

rosen and dan hue. january 3rd a trump/can donahue call. on january 4th eastman is in the oval office presenting this plan. i mean, what clark asked the d.o.j. to do, john eastman, the lawyer who wrote that blueprint for a coup attempt, which is what kinzinger describes it as, is in there the next day. i wonder katie benner where the intersectionity is between what the d.o.j. was supposed to do and what eastman laid out for pence to do. >> it is also one of the things we also sense from the interview asks the many, many documents and email has the committee obtained. is that the justice department was not only being pressured by trump as you saw in that list of communications. also that list of communications was in direct violation of the white house contacts policy. nobody from the white house is supposed to talk to the justice department about investigative steps and prosecutions. that is forbidden. yet we saw that happen many times. the justice department was not just pushing back on pressure from the former president. officials were pushing back on pressure from allies that came from seemingly all corners, people who trump had started to bring into

john, i will let you pick it up from there. we can't let that not become a one-two punch here. to the point the congresswoman is making, here's what we already know that mr. rosen has testified to. these are the notes that his deputy mr. donahue has produced to the senate judiciary committee. quote, this is donald trump, just say that the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and to my congressional allies, mr. donahue wrote in summarizing mr. trump's respond. donahue was rosen's deputy. rosen was reportedly present for the conversation that the notes were taken of and for. do you think that the rosen testimony succeeds more subpoenas. we know who they are? they have been named in the report. do you think that's the next phase here. >> first of all, congresswoman, it is all for the children. would you tang is all for the children. thank you for being an ally on that front. war all for the children. nicole, i totally agree with matt miller that this is a good sign. i have been watching this committee and grading it along the i watch. how serious are they? how far are they willing to go? how tough are they willing to be? they can't relent. they must get t