commissioner johnck, yes. commissioner john, yes. commissioner matsuda, yes. commissioner pearlman, yes. commissioner hasz, yes. item 9, landmark informational presentation. >> good afternoon, commissioners, tim fry here on behalf of mary brown. included in your packets was a memo and the most recent report on your landmark designation program. this is really just an opportunity for us to discuss in a much more detailed format your work program, but also the format of the report, the performance measures we've created that i think will address some of your comments you made during the planning phase of our most recent budget cycle. so, with that, i'm going to quickly walk through just a couple components of this memo and then certainly open for discussion or to answer questions, however you think is the best use of this time. to start out with, i did want to point out on the first page our survey and designations team has been working very hard to wrap up some of the lingers designations we have on file and as you can see, we're going to have a number of local

. >> president hasz commissioner wolfram commissioner honda commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner matsuda commissioner pearlman commissioners first on your agenda is general public comment at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction poovshg povshg the item is reached in the meeting. each member of the public may i have no speaker cards. >> any member of the public wish to speak please come up to the podium. >> good afternoon. i'm mike buehler of the san francisco heritage i know to direct your attention to an article in the chronicle regarding the legislation that is introduced audio supervisor campos to introduce the legacy businesses in san francisco and create a legacy in san francisco heritage has been working with the supervisor in crafting the ordinance the proposed ordinance and it will include we believe roll for the office of small business to research and investigate 30eb8 incentives for legacy businesses and provide recommendations to the board of supervisors i mentione

hilliard's help in trying to find a way to catalog this in a short marijuana commissioner johnck. >> yeah. i think the direction we're moving ♪ the way of sprint if up from the user end as a professional in the field i use the northwest information center a lot in some states part of the depository information in california as outreach for the preservation office if there's so i would this report is going to go into that depository i read for example, a medicaid waiver library congress so i would rely on what's in the folder and bans the comments with the inaccuracy unless we can deal with that that's a problem to have the report adopted so number one the second thing i think that, you know, that i went to the workshop we had and met mr. murray from the performing arts center and met this person in charge the security of the arts museum he turned out to be a landscape architecturally architect without a degree and another gentleman from the district there are so many areas of discussion for this arena i think i'm sorry they're not here today they had interesting things to say but i a

none. >> i move to approval the consent calendar. >> on that motion to approve item 6 commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner matsuda commissioner pearlman commissioner wolfram anyway's so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you under our regular calendar for 19 t planning code amendments for the landmark building and pdr districts. >> good afternoon. i'm with the planning staff glad to be back to talk about that once again, i'm to introduce andrea to talk about refresher where we were and what changes since and ask my colleague tim frye to speak that the progress in the puc and other pieces of legislation and fill in any details in the legislation as well thank you. >> thank you, ann debris with supervisor cohen's office i wanted to thank you this for the thoughtful discussions the first time this was heard and update you on a number of the changes we are relating to be made to the legislation which you see in our packet some of them relate to the specific items we've discussed at the commission specifically around requiring the approval

. >> on that motion of september 27, 2014, be adapted for the minutes commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner matsuda commissioner pearlman commissioner wolfram president hasz so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 68 to zero and passes you on item 5 commission questions or comments. >> commissioner pearlman i just wanted to disclose i had a conversation with andrea with supervisor cohen's office on the topic. >> commissioner matsuda. >> ditto and commissioner johns. >> at the same and also what the supervisor. >> thank you very much seeing no other discloser or comments. >> commissioners that places you in consent calendar are considered to be routine may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. item 6 case no. 2014 h for 55 market street requests for a major permit to alternate i have no speaker cards. >> would any of my commissio

commissioner antonini on that motion to continue item two. >> commissioner antonini commissioner johnck commissioner johnson commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and and places you under your consent calendar there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests, in which event the matter shall consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. you have one item under consent item 3 for case 201453 request for condominium conversion subdivision i have no speaker cards. >> any public comment on that item on the consent calendar? seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner antonini >> move to approve. >> second. >> on that motion to approve item 3 commissioner antonini commissioner johnck commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and place ion commission matters draft minutes for october 9, 2014. >>

. >> commissioner johnck. >> i'm also in support but a question on what this says about our fees i mean, if this developer is willing to pay 2 and a half times than our normal fee what does that say about our fees is it too low maybe this is downtown there's less office how is our fee if we can come up with an opportunity clause with the 13 how is the fcalculated. >> i'll be honest i don't know how the fee is calculated its done at the mayor's office of housing it is upgraded annually to reflect the changes in the cip and the amount of discount through the affordable units you've raised an interesting point the fee as an amount and whether or not that needs to be recease and perhaps we'll work to get a schedule on another day i apologize not an fester activeer answer. >> when is the fee recalculated thank you as the recalculated annually not that i'm aware of there's is a trigger i believe there's some authorization to have that fee upgraded annually but again, i don't know the mechanics how they come up with the number. >> okay thanks. >> commissioner richards. >> i echo commissioner p

commissioner johnck, yes. commissioner johns, yes. commissioner matsuda, yes. commissioner matsuda, yes. commissioner commissioner hasz, yes. >> with that it passes 7-0. >> and with that we will adjourn this meeting. (meeting adjourned). >> everyone here to the tender loin rec center in district six, thank you for being here and it is an exciting day for the city of san francisco and for the rec and park department and for the 32 different parks and places that will have free wifi now thanks to the gift from google and sf city and this is a pro-sxwrekt that is three years in the making and two years originally negotiate with google and researching and implt

commissioner johnck >> yep gretchen my questions are related to an page i think it was 87 this relates to the statement of significance that succeeds that page you mentioned that the statement of significance should be updated is that the just want in terms of the same as the significance draft for the other significance you provided the update and the update is i mean, i read that. >> we provided basically a document provides recommendations for that how the landmark designation could be updated this is not that it is a survey of the landscape features specifically that provides a robust level of what's already out there with the projects we don't at this point open up the designation that already exists. >> thank you and the other relates to principles but i guess the public comments they'll speak so i'll wait to hear from the ones we received in the packet i've responded to 12 and commissioner wolfram. >> i have a general question i kind of felt like i was missing a section i didn't say see an integrity section it jumped from history to those drawings that show contributing or non-c

second to adapt a representation for the approval with the mischievous as corrected commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner matsuda commissioner pearlman commissioner wolfram president hasz so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on item 8 the civic center landscape inventory for disapproval finding of the inventory. >> good afternoon, commissioners department staff that is the inventory or oc i has the landmark district say it district includes a 15 block area i'll show a map a 15 block area roughly by golden gate avenue and market street and the plazas here we go it's bounded by gunning avenue market street and franklin street the district was designated under article 10 of the planning code in 1984 and on the register in 1998 and landmark district in 1987 this was the inventory conducted by itself city and i know you're familiar with the landscaper but for the benefit for the public it is a place where people made physical alternatives the landscape can include trees and buildings and site furnishings or basically any features that

the windows in the brick building and the 20th street facade on commissioner antonini commissioner johnck commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to take a 10 minute break. >> back to the spags regular hearing for october 16, 2014, i'd like to remind members of the audience that the commission does not tolerate disruptions of any kind please, please, please signs our electronics and and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. those of you standing near the doorway clear the area move to the other side of the room folks those of you standing excuse me. gentlemen those of you standing next to the doorway clear the area commissioners we left off under our discretionary review calendar for the cases d and v ottawa street discretionary review and request for variances. >> commissioners my name is sarah of the department staff the item before you is a mandatory discretionary review for a demolition of a unit inform coal valley the project s

commissioner johnck, yes. commissioner pearlman, yes. commissioner wolfram, yes.t motion passes unanimously 7-0 and places into your regular calendar be case 20142013u, the civic center cultural landscape to adopt, modify or disapprove the findings of the inventory. >> commissioners, tim fry, department staff. i'm here on behalf of grech enhilliard who is out of town this week. really just a quick update on the inventory. we certainly heard your comments at the last hearing. what we've done to date is we talked to the consultant and they are scoping out really how much work it would take to complete and finalize the history and addressing all the edits brought up by this commission but also member s of the public. i think we'll have an estimate of how much that will cost in the next week or so, then we'll also have a better idea how long it would take them. my understanding right now is there is a small gap in their schedule so if we're able to engage with them quickly they could get this done in a fairly short amount of time. so that's the good news. right now, t

commissioner johnck, yes. commissioner johns, yes. commissioner matsuda, yes. commissioner matsuda, yes. commissioner commissioner hasz, yes. >> with that it passes 7-0. >> and with that we will adjourn this meeting. (meeting adjourned). >> hi. i am cory with san francisco and we're doing stay safe and we're going to talk about what shelter in place or safe enough to stay in your home means. we're here at the urban center on mission street in san francisco and joined by carla, the deputy director of spur and one of the persons who pushed this shelter in place and sa enough to stay concept and we want to talk about what it means and why it's important to san francisco. >> as you know the bay area as 63% chance of having a major earthquake and it's serious and going to impact a lot of people and particularly people in san francisco because we live on a major fault so what does this mean for us? part of what it means is that potentially 25% of san francisco's building stock will be uninhibit tabl and people can't stay in their homes after an earthquake. they may h

commissioner johnck, yes. commissioner johns, yes. commissioner matsuda, yes. commissioner matsuda, yes. commissioner commissioner hasz, yes. >> with that it passes 7-0. >> and with that we will adjourn this meeting. (meeting adjourned). >> a way of life in san francisco. when the next major quake hits, the city hopes a new law requiring seismic upgrades to five story buildings will help keep more residents safe and sound. tell me a little about the soft story program. what is it? >> it's a program the mayor signed into law about a year and a half ago and the whole idea behind it was to help homeowners strengthen buildings so that they would not coapse. >> did you the soft story program apply to all buildings or building that were built in a certain time frame? >> it only applies to buildings built in the time frame of 1978 and earlier. it's aimed at wood framed buildings that are three or more stories and five or more units. but the openings at the garage level and the street level aren't supported in many buildings. and without the support during a major eart

. >> commissioner johnck. >> i congratulate you, it's a great report and echo the previous comments. as i was looking this over, what i was interested in as a fairly new commissioner is thinking about what are the gaps, what's missing? and so i was interested to read preservation bulletin no. 19, potential san francisco landmarks evaluation form, which apparently was adopted in 1999 and reaffirmed in 2000, identifying priorities as far as themes or what we're trying to accomplish with categories of landmarks. and i wondered if you are continuing to use that, is this -- this looked like it was helpful. well, it's 2014 so it's 14 years old. is there anything we're doing now or need to do now particularly in the context of developing recommendations for the preservation element of the san francisco general plan whether this needs to be updated? but at least this i thought was the most helpful type of thing as far as what i was interested in, what's missing. could staff comment on that? >> commissioner, that's a great comment. as a refresher to all of us, we use that bulletin but we also

commissioner johnck, yes. commissioner johns, yes. commissioner matsuda, yes. commissioner matsuda, yes. commissioner commissioner hasz, yes. >> with that it passes 7-0. >> and with that we will adjourn this meeting. (meeting adjourned). (clapping). >> ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the city of san francisco and is commissioning of unites ship america i'm caption the ships executive officer your ceremony will concepts please place our cell phones on silent foreperson the duration of the ceremony in 1496 we have the authorization of the gun ship to be the first ship of the line in the 81 the congress ordered that to and with caption paul jones obtain our expanding officer congress decided to present this thelize the 16 for fravpz sfaksz in on behalf of the americans freedom it was initially a raising scoots in the raising we know it is the america's cup she served during the civil war for the kidneycy and as a scout in the 1960s and finished her training the section was the germany ocean liner it was sees during world war i and she served in world war i as a t

that motion to continue commissioner antonini commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner johnck's commissioner fong and commissioner president wu smoement national anthem 6 to zero aplaced you under single roll call vote of the commission. commission, the public, or staff so requests in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. item 3 for case 20141111 c at 22 discretionary review authorization and item case intention to initiate the department zoning map to rezone a map to pdr one 3 and item 5 case at 2527 request for discretionary review authorization - conditional use authorization any public comment for items on the consent calendar? okay seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner antonini yeah. i think i'd like to take mission street off because i have questions about the project seems fine i have questions about the basic policy involved. >> okay. >> very good. >> commissioner fong approve to item 3, 4 and 5. >> and on that motion commissioners to approve item 3 and adapt a resolut

. >> commissioner antonini commissioner johnck commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards is commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero. >> yeah, the commission will you'll remember the program is pilot into the small cap between 25 and 50 thousand square feet and there with he have available for the square feet we'll take everything out the the pipeline we still have over one mill square feet no longer than 50 thousand square feet gunning again as you can see we have 2 hundred 1 million square feet in the cap today, if i took out the preponderance of the evidence projects and essentially all the project with form application we're going looking at the a deficit of 7.9 million square feet before we go into the promotions one caveat those are bans the information we have today and the universal truth about the development in san francisco is that they're all subject to change over time and so want to make that clear that is bans our information today also the project are listed by quarter not necessarily

. >> thank you very much i'd like to follow-up with commissioner johnck's question a little bit more than more on the finance more of a comment like the report one thing i'll talk about on this item is i really like to see someone recommend opens o options not only that rely on property owners there were a lot of things outlined pretty much that took the gambit of the options but recommended a feasible alternatives only are the lighting and person i depending on don't think those financing options once the population is engaged for all residents a parcel tax it may get passed on to them but not engaged in where their dollars goes we need the transbay joint powers authority or cash credits or other ways a citizen that doesn't own their property get involved in the 70 infrastructure and a comment i agree with the boarder eir in the town of easier of the crisis in the document that is fantastic is not a huge forest i've talked about the southeast the marsh land that's not huge trees i definitely appreciate that and look forward to seeing the rest of the phases of the master plan. >> tha

and commissioner hillis and commissioner fong voted no and commissioner moore's and commissioner johnck and commissioner fong said they didn't support the project so you had 6 commissioners who want this project changed the plans before the commission were the same envelope plans before you tonight so there will be no further misunderstanding the coordinators were produced in a certified transcript of the hearing the copy were sealed in an envelope with the original signatures should you decide to accept it i have a number of copies with highlights that i'm going to read from until i run out of time do you have a copy for the planning department? well, the document is new the words is in the part of the administrative record and available o'ly want to emphasize from the transcript no doubt at least 6 commissioners wanted this envelope us reduced the envelope before you what's most unusual about the case not a 33 tie all 6 wanted dr that's a difference between what kind of changes they wanted they couldn't make up their mind and the commission secretary closed the hearing we ask i goes s

. >> commissioner johnck commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on your discretionary review calendar portions of the yawned item 13 for 2014 at 1286 delores street request for discretionary review this is an abbreviated discretionary review. >> good evening commissioners subject property is on delores in the mission alley neighborhood for a partial vertical addition with new front and rare roof-decks on a basement corner building to expand the top unit by 5 hundred and 45 square feet and set back to minimize the delores and adhere to the rear yard requirements it runs along the properties interior line shared with 1295 delores street and sent the proposed vertical addition provides a matching light well 3 feet deep and 3 times the length elizabeth of the building the plans presented to the planning commission inaccurately portray the subject light wheels and the design team says this is sufficient for the light and air of the property and the project spo

on that motion to approve the renewal of motions with zero 188 a riersz commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner matsuda commissioner pearlman commissioner wolfram president hasz so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero. >> with that, we'll adjourn that meeting. >> good morning betsy carmichael. >> good morning. >> one more time good morning betsy car michael. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> buns dies. >> my name is 89 i can't i'm the preferential of betsy car michael filipino education center (clapping.) we want to welcome we want okay. we want to testing can everybody hear me we want to welcome everyone to walk and roll today day and on behalf of the betsy car michael community i want to give a warm welcome to the honorable mayor ed lee supervisor supervisor jane kim (clapping (clapping.) superintendent carranza chief suhr (clapping.) and all of city and transportation leaders that who are here this morning. >> (clapping) >> we have very happy to be here today to highlight that walking to school can be fun and healthy for our students betsy car mi

and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes 4 to 3 with commissioner johnck commissioner moore and other commissioner against that is the pine street mixed use for the final environmental impact report the draft public comment is closed the draft eir end on june 30th, 2014, and public comment will be received when this item is called, however, the comments may not be put in the final eir. >> good afternoon, everyone. with tplanning staff that is a financial environmental impact report or eir for the proposed 1527 to pine project case which entails domination of 5 xoifts buildings on the south side even if pine between van ness on the west and austin to the south and a construction of one hundred and 37 square feet at all story building with retailer space soon the ground floor and one hundred 37 housing in the upper levels a copy of the eir draft is in front of the commission and published on may 14th and the public hearing was held and the public comment closed comments and responds were published on september 27th no public comments on the draft eir nor did

. >> commissioner antonini commissioner johnck commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissioner johns and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously have to zero and places you on item 8 for case no. 2014 t reasonable moifgsdz to persons with disabilities seeking fair access to housing in the access code and good afternoon commissioner planning staff i'm here to remedy the modifications ordinance and calendaring this proposed hearing for approval and adaptation that is required by the state and must be finished the reasonable modification ordinances provide a program for the be disables for any barriers to access to their home a reasonable modification modification is to modify the zoning and building registrations that has no undue burn on the city of san francisco or to the zoning and planning program those modifications include the changes to the residential property that enables residence to access their property it has to provide apple continental opportunity to live in the neighborhood some for example, i'll discuss are the access ram

. >> commissioner antonini commissioner johnck commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards is commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero. >> yeah, the commission will

motion of intent to approve the matter with the conditions as noted commissioner antonini commissioner johnck commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero thank you very much and i apologize for all that confusion commissioners that places you under our discretionary review calendar d and v on green street request for discretionary review and the zoning administrator will consider a request for at rear yard surveillance. >> good afternoon commissioner president wu and commissioners i'm the zoning administrator this is an abbreviated analysis typically the team leader provides that but unfortunately, he was not able to be here you with a discretionary review application to contract a third and fourth floor edition to a single-family residences in the r and one zoning it encroachment ten feet plus into the rear yard the exterior stairs from the third story deck governor it is nearly 58 feet deep in an area of 64 thousand square feet it is occupied by the lot the surveillance was scheduled for the july 23rd