not divisive journalism but bad journalism on north korea, i think.this book i opined what is bad journalism on north korea is and studied it. what are the causes. and then what is to be done to overcome it? as per the definition of bad journalism, i think like that. my fellow journalists, inside and outside of south korea are striving day and night to get information and facts what is going on in the sacred kingdom. from time to time we can find some articles or reports which is partially correct or incorrect, inaccurate, unfair, from certain sources. we can see too much guessing, and we can see politically tainted information. and lots of whisper thinking. and then over blame or offer beautify on north korea and kim jong-un. and maybe there will be inadequate quotes from inadequate pundits. that is my definition of bad journalism. yeah. for now i will -- >> thank you. i suspect you're going to have a lot just to feed off from one another. but sensationalism, the word came up. we do see a lot of sensationalism in reporting on north korea. you know, t

so pleased, she's recording it in her journal. the village of pury is 100 kilometers south of manila. the program started off in the village five years ago with 14 sari-sari stores taking part. one of the stores seems to be doing particularly well. belen jimenez runs the store. she's the program leader in the village. the program motivateded her to expand her business. she borrowed 10,000 pesos through microventures to expand the store's crawl space. she began stocking rice, bread and other daily essentials, boosting her product lineup to more than 200 different items. the credit very carefully. vilma immediately records the money owed in her journal. she sets a credit limit for 60 pesos and a deadline for payment. the program inspired her to revamp her business. her daily profit now runs more than 500 pesos, up six fold, and she paid back her entire loan three years ago. at about that time, belen starting making stock purchases on behalf of other store owners. about 30 neighboring sari-sari stores are making use of her services.

politicians and society tends to be rather cynical about journalism. but i see enormous bravery, enormous challenge, great courage going on to surface things that the public really needs to know about. >> journalists go towards danger when others move away. journalists have to get involved with all sides of the conflict in order to get the story. >> it takes a very fearless journalist to get up every day and say, "you know what? i'm determined to continue my profession, even though i may have to spend the rest of my life looking over my shoulder". >> [radio] line 'em all up. come on, fire! >> i came here in 2003, i came to cover the us-led invasion, i got here about three weeks before the bombing campaign started. and i stayed for the next couple of years working on and off. i came because i thought the war was going to be covered pretty heavily in the western media from the position of embedded journalists. you know, if i was going to take any risk at all, i'd rather take the risk making a story that wasn't being told. and i was concerned that the ira

you are on the "washington journal." caller: i think dana winnington, like king, is trying to wake the masses. people need to wake up and look up. this is really happening. like king, it is an uphill battle. global sky watch.com. host: we are talking about mlk's legacy. tony, who best embodies mlk's legacy today? caller: can you hear me? give me a little time, please. i do not think anybody at this time embodies martin luther king . president obama, he does what he can do. he has his own legacy. you should never put jesse jackson jupup there. here's what kills me about this whole thing. martin luther king preached nonviolence and walked nonviolence and acted nonviolence. there was violence against him. they say he was a radical and racist. they called them all kinds of names. now they want to give him all this praise. the majority of white people in this country do not like martin luther king. but now he was this and that and they want to praise him. there is a gentleman that called. he said blacks didn't have a liquor s

he should forget talk news and forget "the wall street journal journal" will never have them.e should move on. does not need rupert. chris christie tentative in iowa on saturday, but in the past 24 snowy hours, back to his bold self. >> i think this is great for him. he is in a hugely crowded field. it's a way for him to stand out. there are some people running that have not done much for the last few years, and he gets to remind everybody he has a day job, and when things are going back at his day job, he is actually pretty good at it. >> wrong. it's a crutch. this gives him a false sense of acting commanding. he needs to be commanding if he is going to run for president and do well. he needs to be commanding without a storm. he's got to create his own weather. this is like giving him a false sense that he is back. final question -- scott walker just formed a group for his presidential efforts. does this guy really also need a super pack pac? >> all these guys need something because they are all running and they need the resources to start hiring people, and they do not want

you are watching c-span's "washington journal just o this day 20 years ago, "washington journal" first went on the air. we are back in a moment. ♪ >>> tonight, on q & a janet murgia president and ceo of the nation's largest civil rights and advocacy group on the state of hispanics in america. immigration reform and her come compelling personal story. >> i had the great privilege of experiencing the american dream here in this country, born in kansas, you know my parents actually came to this country fromin the very early '50s, very early '50 did. my parents came from mexico with no money and very little education. i think my dad had an 8th grade education; my mom, a 5th grade education. and yet they believed in the prompts of this country, and they were seeking better opportunities for their children. so they worked really hard and sacrificed as so many latinos and hispanics have done in this country because they wanted that better future for their children in the promise of this country. they employed important values that have been our guide for me and my six brothers and sisters. th

three al jazerra journal i haves, were arrested tried and sen tested to long prison terms for tryingr the banned political party that only a few months earlier in 2013, had been running egypt. today on the one-year anniversary of their arrest. we are devoting this edition of "inside story" to the continued imprisonment of the peter getter, mohamed fahmy and bahar mohamed and to say once again to the audience in the united states and around the world, journalist is not a crime. buzzing newsrooms came to a standstill monday marking one year since al jazerra journalists peter greste mohamed fahmy and bahar me hommie he had were detained odd terrorism charges in egypt. al jazerra condemns the sentencing, arguing it is a journalist's job to get all sides of the store and it's channel is objective when reporting on the political positions of its fundser qatar. >> al jazerra is a immediate institution. the -- we work in so many different places and we should be taken as a professional media institution, not as a part of any political or ideological or nigh establishment. >> the three mens'

under this administration the war against prifl blowers is, in effect against journalism. the message the white house sending, i'm glad the case is going away but should have gone away a long time ago. when you say we don't have a right to talk to unauthorized sources in government what you're sfektively saying you're only allowed to print official leaks or statement of the government. it undermines the very idea of a free press. the u.s. is not absent in this even if absent in the literal sense on the ground in paris. >> i think to get into comparisons to russia and egypt makes me nervous. >> absolutely. we're much freer and we hold ourselves up as a beacon to the world. there's no comparison with russia turkey united states that doesn't mean we don't have our own war on journalism. yes, there are different levels of it. let's don't preten united states does not have hostile posture

. >> schieffer: i want to talk to you about the "wall street journal" on friday, that the white house is suddenly -- they actually announced this that they're going to -- have new quote, strategy to work with congress on some things of mutual interest and journal finds republicans who say yeah, they think they are ready to talk. is this the new age of miracles here or is this just some first of the year talk. >> two things. one, it's news that people would think about working together. two, most people don't think

"washington journal" is next. ♪ host: good morning.resent obama and the first family returning to the white house. they are flying overnight from hawaii after two_week christmas break. on tuesday, president obama will meet with mexico's president. then, he will hit the road. the focus, jobs, the economy, and homeownership. president obama and vice president biden will be in tennessee. all of this, you can watch on c_span. it is sunday, january 4. the start of a new week, and the start of a new congress. the flag will be at half staff, to honor senator brooke, he died this weekend. the senate leaders want a productive congress. we want your calls in congress __ calls and comment on whether the gop can lead a successful congress. you can also join the conversation, already many weighing in on facebook. orson __ or send us a tweet. this is a legislature preview __ showtime for gop. in a 114 congress, there will be 246 republicans. this is the largest republican majority since post_world war ii. in the senate, 54 republicans, and 21 indepe

it is a slippery slope, but if you are putting out things that are meant to look like journalism and giving them away to news organizations which might run them, i think it crosses a line, and i think governor pence realizes that. that's why he clarified it. >> i think it is the future, and i think your opinion of it is totally irrelevant because it is what it is. it is happening. >> you cannot use government resources to put out new news stories. that's what is happening in china. >> they are already doing it.

it is a really old journal.they knew perfectly that they had all the time, they worked under pressure and they had threats, but now it has really gotten serious. >> thank you very much for now. we will come back to you later in the program. >> the deadly shooting has drawn a strong international response. the european commission president called it an act of barbarism. the white house issued a statement condemning the attack in the strongest possible terms. british prime minister david cameron said his country would stand side-by-side with france. >> mr. speaker, i'm sure the whole house will want to join me in condemning the barbaric attack this morning on the office of a magazine in paris in which it is reported that 10 or more people may have been killed. while details are still unclear i know that this house and this country stand united with the french people and our opposition to all forms of terrorism, and we stand squarely for recently -- free speech and democracy. >> that was british prime minister davi

people will read journalism on the phone if it's presented well. that's tricky to do, but if you can do that, i think that's a pretty big deal. >> what's your watch strategy? >> ha ha! >> will people read long-form journalism on an apple watch or the samsung watches? are you thinking about presenting content on watches? >> not so much presenting content but perhaps presenting moments when you might want to look at content on your phone more contextual moments. there's a variety of things there. there's the obvious like, okay, there's breaking news. you might want to know about that and read it. but also the not so obvious. you might be in a location, standing near the white house. and you might get a notification that, you know, there's something really interesting about this right now, this place that you should know about. >> so it comes into your watch and leads you to your phone? >> to your phone. they're very much linked together. i think there's a tremendous amount of linkage between the phone and watch that i think is going to be critical. >

. >> and investigative journalism and cultural criticism always had a hard time to pay their own way. stomach as they consider -- consumer of literary boundaries to look at what people were paid in 1934 "the new yorker" article that could calculate what $1,930 hour into present value but people were paid a lot more then a couple with that they tend to live in metropolitan areas. and then where real-estate prices skyrocket and we have the double whammy the way the industry has changed. so as an editor i increasingly relied on nonprofits to subsidize writers to take trips to warm places just that type of a journalism but i am extremely concerned that writers are turning into service and that is what was called decent poverty. and to make the choice to write a book that was experimental you could still send your kids to decent public schools and it just isn't possible any more. and it has a lot to do it makes me sad. is back to the fundamental point look at "the new york times" best-seller list this morning there are two new books in we will wake up in five years and say what the hell ju

i did a brief internship with the "journal." when i was graduate student i wrote on -- on a lark i wrote an op-ed for the -- for my own edification really then i thought let's see if i can get this published. so i sent it to "the wall street journal" and the published it. it's a wonderful feeling that to this day the memory of waking up in in the morning, the day i knew the piece was published -- this is before the internet and so i ran out to the nearest book seller, bought a copy of the paper, and anxiously turned the pains, and there i saw my byline in the "wall street journal" and it was a marvelous sensation. >> host: the topic. >> guest: nationalism in democracy. and so on the basis that i was given an internship. i got in touch withed thed a it applied for an internship. there was a two-weeks internship in the brussels office of "the journal. wow wow i don't foe what exactly they were thinking but on the basis of the very brief internship they hired me itch went to work for "the journal" in new york city city and then sho

i like to say on the harriet miers of legal journalism. it's pure nepotism but it's the luckiest of my life because it launched this extraordinary career in journalism at this beautiful magazine and led to what has become one of my most meaningful friendships with frank. this is an extraordinary birth -- and next turn or a book. it's a collection of some of the most intellectually serious and galvanizing work in american letters over the past century. reading it, i was overwhelmed by the sheer intelligence of the essays and the magnitude of their ambitions to transform american politics and cultures. it's a work of high seriousness and it's also beautifully written. it has a serious of tremendous cultural importance of this great magazine which is why we have so much to talk about tonight. i have to put in a brief plug for our upcoming programs. next week, the first hand account of reagan and reykjavik. and then on bill of rights day we are so excited to be opening our new george h.w. bush bill of rights gallery which will include one of t

>>> this week on "the journal editorial report." from washington to wall street and around the world, the stories to watch in 2015 as the presidential field begins to take shape. will hillary clinton see a challenge from the left? and will a frontrunner emerge from the republican side? will president obama cut a nuclear deal with iran and will vladimir putin strike back as the push builds at home. and is this a breakout here for the academymerican economy and will they keep them at bay. we'll look at the stories to watch in 2014. i'm paul gigot. joining the first panel of the year is wall street journal columnist dan lettinger, james freeman and joe rego. the new year means new speculation about the 2016 presidential field. hillary clinton is the democratic frontrunner. dan, this is a story you're following. >> well, sure. the big story for 2015 the 2016 presidential race. people just want to jump into it. hillary clinton, the thing to watch is i think hillary will get into it like two scorpions and a bottle. they hate bill clinton

washington journal is live at 7:00 a.m. eastern on c-span. >> monday night on the communicators, technology reporters review the big issues of 2014 and the key communications and technology issues facing the new year. the washington norse, the national journal, politico. >> that chairman is not expected to unveil his proposal until february pretty gives congress an opening. what will the chairman do in response to that. is i going to force them to move more quickly? will it put him in a position where he will have to do some horsetrading a negotiation with republicans? that is not clear yet. that is something we will be watching. >> i'm expecting they will come out with final roles on net neutrality. obama came out in support of reclassifying broadband services under title ii, which is make it like the utility. the broadband industry groups are opposed to this. there is a lot of pressure on chairman wheeler to go that route good we will see in the first few months what happens there, and even wants the rules are on the book

when i brought this to the "wall street journal" they understandably flipped out. so they actually stopped working with that travel agency until they got it fixed which took quite a bit of time. this is one of the problems of this data age. they did not know. >> the amount of inaccuracies, glitches it would seem hard to get a handle on how much is out there. >> it was very difficult, and i'm sure i do not. i have probably seen a thin layer. most companies do not have to share. facebook let me download an archive of what they have on me, but we no from the european who obtained a full a full set that what i saw was less than what they had. his file had everyone who he had lead as friends posts. it kept this ghostly record of things that he thought were gone. what. what i saw was a more sanitized version. >> we will discuss the steps you took to protect your privacy. i want to to talk through the question that both of us get all the time. what is the harm? you talk a lot about edward's note in the fact that the government was collecting metadata as well as intercepti

welcome to "the journal editorial report." as we look at the stories to watch in 2015 joining our first panel of the new year is wall street journal columnist dan henninger, assistant editor james freeman and joe rago. let's start here at home where the new year means new speculation about the 2016 presidential field. who might knock hillary clinton from her perch as the democratic front-runner. i know this is one story you're following. >> well, sure, the big story for 2015, the 2016 presidential race. people will want to jump into it. the hillary clinton, the thing to watch i think hillary will get into two scorpions in a bottle with the democratic left. they own that party. they hate bill and hillary clinton but really have nowhere else to go. i think hillary will spend 2015 signing a blood oath to follow the democrats agenda and i don't think elizabeth warren will challenge her. i have a real dark horse who's going to lean in eventually, california governor jerry brown. >> he ran against bill clinton believe it or not in 1

let's ask "wall street journal" columnist dan henninger. assistant editorial page editor james freeman and washington columnist kim strassel. so kim, start with you. the president's agenda sounded to me like one more appropriate to say one where nancy pelosi was speaker of the house. kind of a wish list of things what's going to give away. what's the thinking here on his part, the political calculation? >> well, if it wasn't clear already from his veto threats and his executive orders and general aggressiveness from the midterms he has no real interest in working with republicans over the next two years. >> really? it was that definitive of a declaration? >> oh, yeah. i think that's what this state of the union was declaring which is he intends to use the next two years to lay the groundwork for maybe even set the terms for a presidential run by hillary clinton or elizabeth warren and it's going to be all about the middle class and how democrats will make the argument they can make things better with government giveaways to the middle class

-- "the wall street journal." be sure to tune in for a special edition of the "washington journal," a five-our show tomorrow from 7:00 a.m. till noon when the new congress convenes. we will talk to veteran congressional reporters and take your thoughts and tweets and comments from facebook as well. some :00 a.m. until noon. and then our coverage of the swearing-in ceremonies and the new congress begins at noon, live on c-span as well that you can spend your morning in most of your day here with us on c-span. we are talking about your top issues for the 114th congress. johnny from woodbridge virginia. our line for democrats. caller: hello. i would like for the american people to experience what the republicans want to do with this country, to let everything be -- they want to pass through, let it pass through. that will take care of republicans for the next 200 years. the democrats are unable to explain what the republicans want to do to this country. and the people seem like they don't want to know, whatever. just

the "wall street journal" reports that white house officials are telling journal reporters they are planningficant trade corporate tax overhaul and infrastructure legislation. and the journal says, republicans seem to be interested. after a steady diet of bad news and partisan blather that ray of hope upset my digestion but sure enough that's what the article said. so what about all those unilateral actions the president's been taking that put republicans in such a it? here is a direct quote from white house spokesman. those disagreements should not interfere with many areas of bipartisan interest where we can work together. as if to herald a new age of miracle, some republicans seem ready to talk especially on trade. if that is so can filling potholes and popping up old bridges be far behind? i'm still not sure i believe any of it. but it is nice to think about and if it does prove true, remember you heard it here second. "wall street journal" got the scoop. back in a minute. push your enterprise and you can move the world. ♪ ♪ but to get from the old way to the new you'll need the right it

i did a brief internship with the journal. when i was a graduate student on a lark i wrote an op-ed wrote an op-ed for my own edification and i thought let's see if we can get this published soy scented to "the wall street journal" and they published it. it's a wonderful feeling. to this day the memory of waking up in the morning that they had me the piece was published, this was before the internet. so i ran out to the nearest bookseller bought a copy of the paper anxiously turned the pages in their eyes on my byline in "the wall street journal." and it was a marvelous sensation. the topic was nationalism and democracy. and so on the basis of that i was given an internship. i got in touch with the editor and applied for an internship. i was granted a two-week internship in the brussels office of the journal and i don't know what exactly they were thinking but on the basis of a very brief internship they hired me. i went to work for the journal in new york city and shortly after that for a couple of years after that went to br

robert cantu edited the journal's sports medicine section.s were published despite his objections. >> the papers that started to make statements about: multiple head injuries were not a problem in the nfl. if they went back into the same contest with a concussion, it didn't matter. if they got knocked out and went back into the same contest it didn't matter and there were no long-term psychological problems or cognitive problems in these athletes, in essence saying it wasn't a problem. >> narrator: dr. cantu says he took his concerns to the journal's editor-in-chief, dr. michael apuzzo. apuzzo was also a consultant for the new york giants. >> i said that i really think this data is flawed. i really think it shouldn't be published. he's the one that made the decision to publish papers no matter whether the reviewers felt they should be published or not, no matter whether the section editor felt they should be published or not. >> narrator: mark lovell was a member of the committee and an author on some of the studies. he now admits there were

people will read journalism on the phone if it's presented well. that's tricky to do, but if you can do that, i think that's a pretty big deal. >> what's your watch strategy? >> ha ha! >> will people read long-form journalism on an apple watch or the samsung watches? are you thinking about presenting content on watches? >> not so much presenting content but perhaps presenting moments when you might want to look at content on your phone, more contextual moments. there's a variety of things there. there's the obvious like, okay there's breaking news. you might want to know about that and read it. but also the not so obvious. you might be in a location standing near the white house. and you might get a notification that, you know, there's something really interesting about this right now, this place that you should know about. >>

finally, you can send an email to journal @c-span.org. from "time" magazine "american sniper" screenwriter jason hall says "i bled for this thing." "american sniper" may be quickly stealing the title of the most politically controversial film this oscar season, but screenwriter jason hall maintains he just penned a portrait of a beleaguered soldier, not a political statement. the biopic of chris kyle whorkt navy credits with the most kills in american military history, broke january records with a whopping $90.2 million at the box office over the weekend in spite of or perhaps because of critics who say the film glorifies a murderer, not to mention a war america never had any business fighting in the first place. "people see the movie poster and it's got a good in the american flag and they know clint eastwood directed it," says jason hall, "so they think it's some jingoistic thing. i would challenge that. chris kyle was a man who believed in something and who therefore was use to feel a goovet that needed him to go to war t. cost him his

. >> lucy, speaking from the grave, in her very own journal. >> i mean, she wrote it down. >> tonight, the jury, the verdict, the outrage. with the police on trial, too. >> who dropped the ball? >> who killed lucy johnson, in the burning bed? here now, david muir and elizabeth vargas. >>> good evening and welcome to this special edition of "20/20" saturday. we start tonight with a question that's haunting a small american town. is a killer still walking free on their streets? because authorities say where there's smoke, there's fire. >> and elizabeth, as you know, this was a big fire, covering up a crime scene. an emergency room nurse found dead on a burning bed. but did she share that bed with her killer? there are plenty of suspects here with secrets to hide. who is it? take this inside look tonight at the evidence and see if you can decide before the jury does. here's jim avila. >> reporter: 3:00 in the morning down hidden meadow court. a warm, sticky night, clear skies, full moon. a peaceful scene shattered by a spark. >> gaston county 911. >> we have a house fire, fully engulfed,

on the next "washington journal," l philip klein. afl-cio representative richard trunca talks about the minimum wage debate and the state of labor unions. as always we'll take your conversationed on facebook and twitter. "washington journal" live at 7:00 a.m. eastern on c-span. >> this sunday on "q & a". p >> don't forget, a lot of hormones are changing in young men and women, and the brain hasn't seen this in life until you hit teenage years. sco the brain is trying to learn how to respond to these new hormones rolling around and locking on to receptors. so it is trial and error. i think it contributes to this rollercoaster experience that we watch as parents. >> sunday night at 8:00 eastern c-span's q & a. >> here on c-span, "the communicators" is next discussing net neutrality as the f.c.c. plans to vote on the plan this month. then talking about national security threats. and later, a discussion on how the media covers race issues in the u.s. >> this is "the mommunicators" on c-span from las vegas. >> now joining us on "the commu

>>> what did you think reading his journal? >> it sounds like the mind of a sociopath. they kill your dog and then help you go find it. >> announcer: tonight on an all new "20/20," a tale of love, lies, videotape and murder. >> charged with premeditated murder, kidnapping and poisoning. >> announcer: an explosive teenage love triangle that started in high school and ended in a shallow grave with a bombshell courtroom decision in a trial watched by millions. >> just now, we've got a verdict. >> there were some reporters than even squealed. >> announcer: two boys, best friends, vying for the same girl and one of them even killing for her. >> it was sickening. >> announcer: here tonight the woman in the red-hot center. >> you know, i'm freaking out. >> announcer: we'll take you inside the mind of a teenage killer. but which one? from surveillance cameras to the police interrogation room. >> was there a moment during that interrogation that you said, "i'm speaking to a murderer"? >> announcer: to the witness stand. >> now, i have to have this person, this monster, you know,

and we do that through our investigative journalism.'s something you're going to need to see from us starting this weekend. >> the "chronicle" hasn't made money in years. in fact the whole newspaper industry is struggling right now to survive. what will you do to keep the "chronicle" afloat? >> well actually, i'd correct you right there. in the last two years we have been solidly profitable. so we are making money. and that's a really good place for us to be right now. we're projected to make more this year than we did last year. so i'm really very bullish on it. i think there were some dark times and we're getting through them and you know part of it is to talk to people about what we're doing how we do it why it's better than everybody else so that they see value. we also need the support of our community like everybody. so you know, we want people to consume the journalism and if they consume a lot of it to pay for it. >> there's a lot of talk about digital models, and i know that you say the paper is making money. it's still operate

"washington journal" live at 7:00 a.m. eastern on c-span. next, a conversation with the ceo of whole foods, walter rob. silicon valley ceos talk about the challenges of internet startups. after that supreme court justices clarence robert, -- discuss life on the court. now, interviews from the washington ideas forum cohosted by the atlantic and aspen institute. it brings together leaders, at officials, business entrepreneurs, journalist and science and technology experts. among the speakers in this portion, whole foods ceo walter robb talks about bringing his stories to urban areas. this is just under one hour. [applause] thank you, steve. we are in for a treat today. thank you for being with us. and i should say thank you for writing this book. if you have not read her books you should live in, particularly the book "americanah," which is so interesting because it provides this window and at the same time a mirror into issues of race and culture and class in this country, but also on the continent of africa. i want to talk about your experie

and then opinion journalism in particular. and the jury is still out. response globally to this tragedy. the overwhelming public outturning in france and in the united states and around the world of people taking just the opposite of a cowering stance. the we are not afraid. and it's -- >> very encouraging. >> it was a public recognition of the importance of reexpression. it remains to be seen what kind of -- i mean freedom of expression is a very complicated thing. the market forces, we will -- >> the cartoon, you're in the satire business. it will be too offense to some people. >> it's an interesting cultural different between european cartooning and american cartooning. i'm not sure what everyone thinks that means. the standards of what is normal, visual discourse and cartooning in europe is a little bit different in the united states. they're more free wheeling. they go more for vulgar, confrontational imagery. automatically, right off the bat when i draw a car another one toon, i'm working in the american context which is more visually circumscribe

the consequences for investigative journalism ruinous. in order to produce adversarial reporting, journalist learnt that becoming more tech savvy is part of the job distribution. now within digital security and how it should be at the top of the journalistic agenda. >> reporter: when edward snowden first contacted journalist glenn greenwald to go public about the n.s.a. programme. one of the first demand was to secure their communication. what followed was a crash course in encryption. for greenwald and his company, it was an a first. >> this is a reason, a cyber threat, a reason people don't take it seriously enough, because you don't know when you are being spied on. >> when journalists are aware that they were targets for surveillance, many were not thinking about security and privacy for long. we are starting to see a maturity, journalists are understanding what security measures are needed. >> crucial to the governments who are convincing journalists about the security. there's no way to protect data or information if we don't learn

a classic part of good journalism, responsible journalism, going many many centuries back is that yourna provide people with information that is actionable that they can use to make informed decisions on what to believe or positions to take on certain issues, and a key part of covering war is that you have to have journalists willing to go to the other side to speak with the people that you're told are the enemy. and to get their perspective. so we can better understand the nature of this conflict. so just as i have gone to areas in yemen are controlled by al qaeda or areas in somalia controlled by al-shabaab or areas in afghanistan that are controlled by the taliban, we have an obligation [indiscernible] understand where al qaeda in the potential is coming from. the idea we should have a special standard that in certain cases were not journalists, but we are somehow militant nationalists who should not engage in responsible journalism because the us government doesn't like us talking to those individuals, to make him a just flies in the face of just basic journalistic principles. >> t

. >> how would you start your journal? dear diary, dear journal, what do you think?s 10 years old. >> he's a dude so i don't think dear diary or dear journal. i think it's hey, i met a hot girl on the play ground. >> you are so scarily accurate. this is how he starts it. [ bleep ]. this story is entirely about a girl kayla. >> she's sexy. i like her. i want to win her over. ben, another guy in a class, who plays with us. >> he wants to take her away from ben but apparently kayla is not just into ben. >> kayla likes tons of people. she likes chris. he's in our band. he's the bass player b-a-s-e, bass. our band is good as balls. >> it's all about trying to win kayla over. let's see how it goes on day two. >> i'm too tired for you, diary no offense. goodig >> obviously falling off the wagon. >> the story continues on february 24th. >> today i gave kayla my extra chicken nugget and her friend sarah said that was so sweet, but i just say whatever. >> thug life! he's giving away the nuggets. >> today i'm going to get a cd that has simple plan all over it and blink 182. tho

>> there is a trend towards journalism becoming opinion journalism because it is cheap.it doesn't cost them traveling time or reporting time to rip on even's of the day. they don't have to go out and find information, so i think there are elements of journalistic information gathering that are in serious jeopardy and that is worth worrying. >> ok, yes ma'am? >> from the very beginning, "the new york times," has been owned by one family, and "the washington post," has been owned by one family and has been sold to amazon.com. i wonder what you think about the new ownership of "the post?" >> it is pretty soon to guess about the ownership of "the post," so far, but it is way too soon to tell what it is going to mean down the line. down the line, "the washington post," could be a good one because they might have much deeper pockets. it could turn out very well, we just don't know what that owner's priorities are yet. >> i would just add as a cautionary note that the new executive editor has no real background in journalism. he is essentially a fixer, and a very sophisticated

the state party chair tells the wall street journal, he plans to campaign in the caucus. sitting out congressman king's freedom summit. meanwhile vice president joe biden is still considering his own run for the white house from the left. >> is there any chance you're going to challenge her? >> yes, there's a chance. but i haven't made up my mind about that. there's plenty of time. look the person who's going to end -- and secretary clinton is a capable person and competent. the person who's going to be the next president of the united states is the one who can articulate the clearest vision of where they're going to take the country. >> george stephanopoulos there asking joe biden about the president presidential campaign. hillary clinton, didn't shy away from showing holes in the economy. >> again, i think the president doesn't get the credit he and his team deserve for the way that they navigated through this difficult area i would have differences, everybody would have differences about what else could have been done the fact is we're look at a real upsurge in growth.

eastern, "washington journal." tonight on c-span, students, activists, and law enforcement officials discuss racism in america. this event took place in cleveland. the panel also discusses a justice department report which accuses the cleveland police of using unnecessary force. here is a portion. >> i don't think that black people or brown people have the power to be racist, in a sense. if you slap me and i am upset that you slap me and i slap you back -- i'm not encouraging anybody to slap anybody, but i am reacting to what i have you done with me -- that is what is going on here. we don't have the power. you are talking about institutionalized racism, the power to create and enact laws. the power to stop a person from doing something or allow them to do something. there is discrimination across the globe. look at what is happening in nigeria. look at what is happening in places in europe and parts of asia. there are all types of people. what we see across the globe is that there is hatred that exists and hatred

why did they attack the albuquerque news journal? no idea, no explanation. that was part of what was funny about it. why that paper among all of the papers in the world? that was on christmas eve. they hijacked an article on the albuquerque journal news website and replaced it with this one. christmas will never be merry any longer. which is ridiculous. then they posted stuff like this you'll see no mercy infidels. we are already here in your pcs in each house and each office. with allah's permission we begin with can albuquerque. no offense to albuquerque, but why would anyone begin with albuquerque. it seems like a weird story when that happened on christmas eve. last week round two happened again. it was the same imagery as you can see. the same language. i love you isis all of that stuff. same stuff used in the attack on christmas eve, but the attack last tuesday -- i should say they also changed the banners it is the same imagery from the two attacks. same imagery on tuesday. again on tuesday, round two, the albuquerque news journal that got attacked. s