chief justice roberts: justice sotomayor? justice sotomayor: counsel, a race is sort of an artificial creation, right? it measures how fast you can go from point a to point b, correct? mr. hinojosa: in some respects, yes, your honor. justice sotomayor: all right. but what colleges are doing is not saying -- they're not looking at the runners when putting them in this race; they're looking at the applicant, at the student as a whole measure, correct? mr. hinojosa: yes, your honor. justice sotomayor: and if we said that applicants from white schools can start here, if applicants from socioeconomic schools don't start at the same place, you're going to push them back, right? mr. hinojosa: yes, your honor. justice sotomayor: so what the schools are doing is looking at all the factors to try to put the students at the start as equals, correct? mr. hinojosa: that's correct, your honor. justice sotomayor: and race is not defining in that it's not the one factor in any application that makes a difference? mr. hinojosa: there is zero evidence

it was -- the formerly most senior justice throws a welcome party for the new junior justice, justice jackson. i got to do that, we did it last january. it's just for the justices and their spouses, and retired justices and their spouses as well. so you can pick your favorite food and she picked her favorite entertainment. she really loves hamilton, i found someone who sang on broadway, and he serenaded her with some songs. but it's really important to have people on the court to consider friends. the mako justice kavanaugh, and his wife ashley found some new orleans singers to sing some jazz music, including a second line. >> i wanted to ask you about one difference between you and the other women justices of the court. you might be the first mother with minor children to serve on the court. indeed, you are a justice and a mother with several children in school. how do you manage your work as a justice and the challenge of parenting school-age children? justice barrett: let's see. i think that might days and the struggle of balancing being a mother and having children and school and

protests are calling for a permanent ceasefire. no justice, no peace, no justice, no peace, no justice, no peace, justice, justice will be served, justice, justice, in france, thousands demonstrated in leon, demanding an end to israel's massacre of civilians in the gaza strip, in the spanish city of barcelona, people took to the streets, voicing support for palestinians while urging the extension of the four-day true. america's new york city also gathered in manhattan disrupting black friday shopping and chanting slogans against israel. police arrested some 30 people during the demonstration. similar events were held in other countries. in a remarkable display of unity and solidarity. stein freedom march took place in the heart of lahore just few miles from the us consultate. the proximity of the march to the us consultate added significance to it as the really sought to convey message not only to the international community, but specifically to the united states, key supporter of israel in the war on gaza. israel is fascist. the whole world now understands that israel is fascist regim

justices. prior to monday, each justice had the ability to go to a lot prefers her, -- a law professor. there was consistent advice being emanated from the court to help justices navigate ethical conundrums so there is no ethics office. third, there is no way to file a complaint against the justice. you are a lower court judge, there has been a federal law since 1980 that says any person can file a complaint against any judge. there is a way to say -- 99% of these complaints are employees who usually go through them and say, these are the frivolous ones and the serious ones. any complaint, any misconduct, any ethical behavior, it can be looked into by a body of judicial peers. they can say, this was unethical behavior. we received this complaint. here is a reprimand. here is ethics training. here is anti-harassment training. here is a private reprimand because maybe it does not arise to the level where it needs to be made public, but talk to you in private to fix the problem. there was no inbox, no enforcement mechanisms. host: the supreme court issued a statement when they came out with these ethics rules, saying the court has long had the equivalent of commo

palestine, one can we use this, humanitarian justice, which is the essence of religion, which is justice, and this is the truth of religion, religion is for justicech is which we witness in this region is especially at the level of the cause of resistance, especially in palestine, and we therefore, this entails upon us to be to be the victor for the oppressed and to be against the oppressor, everything we've said in the beginning would lead to the fact that we need to take this as a priority, we need to also create some sort of a framework, would be for, the majority of the clerics and religious references throughout the islamic world, would be and the objective of this framework, be to give victory and support to the resistance to face the oppression and colonialism and all the projects of hegemany and one of the main factors of work in this framework to prohibit any work with any company which supports the israeli regime and all those companies and corporations which assist it throughout the in impacting and strengthening the focus on this campaign, but these capabilities are very limited any type of normalization of ties, we need to put the fo

protests calling for a permanent ceasefire. justice, justice will be served, justice, justice is the world, and france thousands demonstrated a leon, demanding an end to israel's massacre of civilians in the gaza strip. in this pennisida, barcelona, two people took to the streets on sunday, voicing support for palestinians while urging the extension of the four-day truce. america's new york city also gather manhattan, disrupting black friday shopping, chanting slogans against israel. police arrested some 30 people during that demonstration. a peaceful march for peace. as the bombs temporarily stop falling from the sky above gaza, hundreds of thousands of pro-palestine demonstrators of all faites are back to the streets of the british capital, many travelling from other parts of the uk, united in their demands. we need to uh, we need to see fire, we need to end the siege in gaza, we need to end the occupation and free palestine. a long-term solution is immediate ceasefire, longer term seisfire. it is an end to the system of apartide, it is an end to the occupation. it is an end to the

justice jackson has filed a dissenting opinion in which justice sotomayor and justice kagan join. justice jackson did not participate in the harvard case. justice thomas: i joined the court's opinion in full, although it is not my practice to announce my separate opinions from the bench. the race-based discrimination against asian americans in this case compels me to do so today. in the wake of civil war, our nation amended our constitution to abolish slavery. it further proclaimed all persons born in the united states are citizens entitled to the privileges or immunities of citizenship and the equal protection of the laws. as justice harlan claimed in dissent in plessy versus ferguson, our constitution is colorblind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. the great failure and tragedy of this country was slavery and its progeny. and the great failure of this court was its misinterpretation of the reconstruction amendments and its rejection of justice harland's view in plessy, thereby sanctioning decades of racial discrimination and jim crow laws. for the past two

justice kagan. we had justice breyer. we had our own. but the person who appeared year after year was justice ginsburg. justice ginsburg her husband was on our faculty. she really cared so profoundly for this community. every year whenever we invited her, she would come. we decided to name this lecture series in her honor. so this year she spoke. and then the second year she got proctor and trent secretary of state clinton. i'm trying to think how do we keep up with this incredible tradition? we figured it out. the honorable speaker nancy pelosi. [applause] so she does not really need an introduction. fifty-second speaker of the house of representatives. she made history in 2007 when she was the first woman elected to serve as speaker then she made history again in 2009 when she regained the speakership the first person to do that in six cap decades. as speaker she led the passage of really transformative legislation. including the american recovery and reinvestment act in 2009. the affordable care act of which she was the architect the first ever comprehensive energy legislation to fight the climate cr

freedom rides freedom, justice, justice, justice, justice. yes, yes. lord oh, yes. oh, god, yes. go back. read a writ. don't write about freedom. we have freedom. we got a job to do. we can't get rid of. can't all we got done is to go ahead. oh, oh, i've got the job. we come here to say the. oh, we're god's children. surely we know we got a job to do. we can't get until we get through. god. oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh oh. thank you. thank you, choir thank you, minister harris, for setting the context down the set. the occasion. reverend dr. christopher, pastor of the tabernacle church and former pastor of the 16th street baptist church. good morning, pastor christ. madam. associate justice, honorable mayor, brothers and sisters, several years ago, before his death, november 15, 2007, i was blessed to spend time with the reverend john cross, our beloved pastor, who was serving his congregation 60 years ago. reverend cross shared that since the bombing and the deaths of four girls and the injury, members of this church a day did not pass where he did not think of sunday, september 15th,

justice, not? justice jackson? >> thank you council. >> pickwick think you your honor. >> mr. chief justice in may it please the court as the vernment explained in the first arguments the correct overarching test is duty or thity. we think how that test plays out in a case like this one about denial of access to property it shldook closely to the nature of the property. and so were asked whether this is an exercise of power and justice were happy to view this as evidence of that. we think the way the court should look at the set of cases is a state action general exists in a denialf access to property case b either the governme controls the property such as an official facebook page or defda is exercising a dutyhat requires providing access such as conducting a cy council meeting on facebook libor justice jackson in his backyard is something that reir providing accs that would be something that's an exercise of state power. by contrast thepprance and content test that myriend on the other side advances imperils th freedom of government officials to speak as a public citizen that's a public

, justice is satisfied, because it seems to us that since such a price has already been paid for that's all, it seems to us that this justice and society expects that justiceshould still win, and if it doesn't win, well, it seems to me that this is a bit of a utopia, that we will have a satisfied demand for justice, i what i was preparing for in vain, that we have there's going to be a lot of people who feel that what... that they , that their sacrifices are undervalued, so that their work is undervalued, that their contributions are undervalued, and i don't think we're just going to have the resources to deal with that, here it's not even a question of whether we are capable of it, but here it's even just a question of resources, eh, because, well , in the end, it seems to me that this is another peculiarity of ukrainian society. well, relatively young, that young is dynamic in the good sense of the word, and like every young person, feels his uniqueness underestimated, so do we as a society, every tiny social group , she believes that she has done the most, that is why the fact that this demand for justice will be unsatisfied, i would still accept as a g

to organize and mobilize and continue. continue to fight for justice, the khan calls it addle, justice, and we got to keep on fighting justice to justice roll downs like water, and our righteous rose like mighty stream, we want justice, we demand justice for palestine, and the people of gaza, we demand it, we demand it, we're not begging for it, we demand, so we're going to speak truth to power. "we got to speak truth to power and we got to come together and we got to let it people know that we're not going to be solid, oh no, we're not going to be solid, we're going to not be like a little meon kitten, we're going to roll like lion, and we're going to continue to raise our voices, these are our voices and we're going to lift all of our voices and we'll lift every voice and sing tell earth and heaven rings, rings with the harmony of liberty, and facing the rise in sun, for our new day and palestine has begun, and we'll march on, and we'll play on, the victory is one, free palestine. free palestan, free the land, free the people, free the land and free palestine, all right, live there from washington dc, we're uh listening to

anymore with regard to sort the extent to which the justices care, i mean, the justices are are they not in it? right. so you have one extreme. you have justice samuel alito who says i couldn't believe he actually said this, who said in july, no provision of the constitution gives congress the power to regulate the supreme court period. he would have failed my commonwealth class at that. right. justice alito, who we should say sits in a seat congress created in 1837. i don't think he thinks he's unconstitutional. so at extreme, you have the sort of the view expressed by justice alito, which is not only we not accountable, but you can't hold us to account. right? we ought not to be accountable to you. other people and actors. and then the other extreme, i mean, you have i think folks like justice kagan, who has quite publicly that she thinks the court needs have an ethics code who has started voluntarily explaining why she's recusing from cases, something that none of the other justices do. and i'll just say you have someone like justice amy coney barrett, who i think is actually a really player in this conversation and who went out of her way

justice. justice is not a political thing, if it is wrong. justice is something that should include everyone. he should deliver these documents to mr. beheshti. the movie expediency, which is a joint product of surah cinematic organization and oj film and series center , has been shown in cinemas all over the country now with brekht's show on the platforms available to those interested in broadcasting news. well, while announcing the end of this news segment, i invite you to continue to deal with the details of the seventh program bill in the parliament. the end of the voting has been approved. well, friends, let mr. vahidi have two more minutes. please, give reminder 75 , mr. vahidi . ghirni by my brother, mr. dr. jokar, i would like to share these few points. first, the meeting of ghirni is ordered your highness was based on the report presented by the education commission, that is, we made 10 reports for the lack of human resources at the beginning of the academic year 1402 1403. based on this, decisions were also made in the meeting, with the rem

justice. why do you think civil rights and economic rights, racial justice and economic justice go together, andwhat should we be not today -- be working on today? marc: one thing people tend to forget is the best known civil rights case, brown versus board, was about economic rights. and the challenge to separate but equal was about black students that had to walk to school and white students whose school was closer and they had a bus. it is important to recognize that when rosa parks refused to give up her seat, it was about transportation rights. the civil rights act of 64 was about employment discrimination, public accommodations -- the right to eat at a lunch counter, the right to hold a job. economics is intertwined into the civil rights movement and eat those and struggle and it is often forgotten that in the 19 60's, there were four what i call justice initiatives for the civil rights act of 1964, the voting right act of 1965, the jobs and anti-poverty programs of 1966, and the fair housing act of 1968. there has been an intertwining and i believe we have to restore -- the organization i

that rule goes on to specify that a justice should disqualify himself or herself, when, quote, the justice knows that the justiceor the justices spouse, or minor child, residing in the justice awesome. as a financial interest in the subject matter controversy, or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be affected substantially by the outcome of the proceeding. that means that clarence thomas should not have participated indicates involving trump white house chief of staff, mark meadows text messages that could have included text messages to and from clarence thomas's wife. it also means, according to a reasonable observer, that clarence thomas cannot participate in many cases involving donald trump. since clarence thomas's spouse has a very strong interest in donald trump. the new supreme court rules seem to have created the perfect carveouts for the chief justice's wife to continue to earn millions upon millions of dollars from law firms, whose lawyers appear before the supreme court. the new disqualification rule says, that a justice should disqualify himself or herself, if, quote, the

justice delayed is never justice denied. he became a senator a few years back. here to present the associate justice, senator doug jones. thank you, pastor. good morning, everyone. >> good morning. >> honored guests, families of these wonderful children. this has been a long time coming. i want to take just a second, though, we talked about this. i get far too much credit for the cases that were solved. you can't do that on my own. and just like the mayor needed to recognize his cohorts at city hall and city council, i want to recognize some folks also that were a big part. we have for us for the first time as a team, i gathered almost all of my prosecution team is here, along with former alabama attorney general bill baxley. and i would like to ask all those team members to please stand and be recognized for the work that they did. [applause] thank you for that. for them, thank you very much. each year, each year we gather at this time, in this place to remember, to honor, to remind ourselves of a past that we should never go back to. but also the hope and the possibilities that our future holds. but this year's differe

the movie expediency clearly talks about justice, that justice is not a political thing. if there is a mistake, justice is something that should include everyone . these documents should be verified by mr. beheshti. the movie is armed, which is a joint product of sourah and center cinema organization. the movie and the series will be finished after the show in cinemas all over the country, now with online screenings on the platforms available to those interested in broadcast news, more than 4,000 people die of brain death in the country, while up to 10 people die every day due to the lack of a transplanted organ. ic of imam rezai birjand hospital is trying to encourage families of brain dead patients to transplant organs. a lasting legacy. for several years , they have been cooperating with the university as the satisfaction coordinator of brain death patients. he links lost lives to new ones. a patient who suffers brain death will never come back. as i am doing the work of satisfaction, i must have reached my conviction that this patient of mine is brain dead and there is no turning back. i cannot tal

and so, it does- that there is a two—tiered system of justice here and so, it does requirel justice here and so, it does require a lowering — justiceure, not a ratcheting up — a lowering of the temperature, not a ratcheting up of— a lowering of the temperature, not a ratcheting up of the _ a lowering of the temperature, not a ratcheting up of the temperature - a lowering of the temperature, not a| ratcheting up of the temperature and there are _ ratcheting up of the temperature and there are a _ ratcheting up of the temperature and there are a lot— ratcheting up of the temperature and there are a lot of— ratcheting up of the temperature and there are a lot of politicians - ratcheting up of the temperature and there are a lot of politicians and - ratcheting up of the temperature and there are a lot of politicians and i - there are a lot of politicians and i think— there are a lot of politicians and i think this — there are a lot of politicians and i think this is — there are a lot of politicians and i think this is true _ there are a lot of politicians and i think this is true on _ there are a lot of politicians and i think this is

justice, where is justice, where is justice in this section, there is no justice, ceremonies, remembrancetell you of course. some of the corpses are buried in the ground under the parking lot. i thought that the clear, unmistakable proof would be two-faced if i were to come and dig and find there the holy grave that the people did not dig. graves and find them and excavate them, official israel, government, foreign ministry, mainstream academia, would find a way of saying that what we see is not what we see, don't think it holds water, there is no reason to do it, i don't think they find anything there, and i don't think it's worth the effort, don't you want to solve it once and for all, i don't care. if it isn't sound for me and i don't think for the state of israel, it doesn't work, it's a huge project if it is possible at all, which are very much doubt, and for what, because some idiot said. we have an editorial aerial photo of the tantore area on the screen right now. an aerial photograph from 1946, we see the village before the war, and all that remains of the tent a single house sta

. >> i just want justice justice for my son el. >> el o los responsables siguen sin ser identificados entregue a las autoridades. quien tenga información puede comunicarse con el departamento de la policía. oiga. y el proceso de inscripción del seguro cover california ya comenzó, por lo que esta mañana autoridades en la ciudad de san francisco ofrecieron una conferencia de prensa para informar sobre esto a todos los californianos. andrés brender tiene más detalles. andrés, cuéntanos. nos >> así es. qué tal? nosotros estábamos aquí en crissy field, en san francisco, escuchando a oficiales de covered california dando importante información para la comunidad. y es que el proceso de inscripción para recibir este beneficio, este seguro, pues comenzó hoy y va a seguir. hasta va a durar hasta el 31 de diciembre. es importante saber que usted necesita tener por ley un seguro médico y este es un beneficio que ofrece el estado, donde la mayoría o el. el promedio de personas que lo reciben no paga. generalmente más de 10■!a. eso está e es un programa que beneficia enormemente a las familias de b

write about the request for justice, this is actually what i think, this is a very so-so response to the request for justice, let's talk about whether this request for justicetice will be satisfied, because it seems to us that since such a price has already been paid for everything, yes , then it seems to us that this justice, and society expects that justice must still win, and if it does not win, well, it seems to me that this is a little bit of a utopia, that we will have a satisfying demand for justice, which is what i was unfairly preparing for, that we will have a lot of people who will feel, that they, for example, their sacrifices are underappreciated, that their work is underappreciated, that their contribution is underappreciated, and i don't think we 'll just have the resources to deal with it, here it's not even a question of whether we or we capable, and here it is even a simple question resources, eh, because, in the end, it seems to me that this is another feature of ukrainian society, which is relatively young, and young dynamically, in the good sense of the word, and just as every young person feels his uniqueness is undervalued, so do we a

the crime and justice bill, which is — about the crime and justice bill, which is in — about the crime and justicerime and justice bill, which is in a1 clause _ about the crime and justice bill, which is in a1 clause or- about the crime and justice bill, which is in a1 clause or two - about the crime and justice bill, i which is in a1 clause or two clause bill. which is in a1 clause or two clause biii~ it_ which is in a1 clause or two clause biii~ it will— which is in a1 clause or two clause biii~ it will be _ which is in a1 clause or two clause bill. it will be a — which is in a1 clause or two clause bill. it will be a substantial- which is in a1 clause or two clause bill. it will be a substantial piece. bill. it will be a substantial piece of legislation _ bill. it will be a substantial piece of legislation setting _ bill. it will be a substantial piece of legislation setting out - bill. it will be a substantial piece of legislation setting out how- bill. it will be a substantial piece of legislation setting out how we will protect — of legislation setting out how we will protect the _ of legisl

justices. prior to monday, each justice had the ability to go to a lot prefers her, -- a law professor. there was consistent advice being emanated from the court to help justiceshical conundrums so there is no ethics office. third, there is no way to file a complaint against the justice. you are a lower court judge, there has been a federal law since 1980 that says any person can file a complaint against any judge. there is a way to say -- 99% of these complaints are employees who usually go through them and say, these are the frivolous ones and the serious ones. any complaint, any misconduct, any ethical behavior, it can be looked into by a body of judicial peers. they can say, this was unethical behavior. we received this complaint. here is a reprimand. here is ethics training. here is anti-harassment training. here is a private reprimand because maybe it does not arise to the level where it needs to be made public, but talk to you in private to fix the problem. there was no inbox, no enforcement mechanisms. host: the supreme court issued a statement when they came out with these ethics rules, saying the court long had the equivalent ofmon-law ethics rules,

justices. prior to monday, each justice had the ability to go to a lot prefers her, -- a law professor. there was consistent advice being emanated from the court to help justiceshical conundrums so there is no ethics office. third, there is no way to file a complaint against the justice. you are a lower court judge, there has been a federal law since 1980 that says any person can file a complaint against any judge. there is a way to say -- 99% of these complaints are employees who usually go through them and say, these are the frivolous ones and the serious ones. any complaint, any misconduct, any ethical behavior, it can be looked into by a body of judicial peers. they can say, this was unethical behavior. we received this complaint. here is a reprimand. here is ethics training. here is anti-harassment training. here is a private reprimand because maybe it does not arise to the level where it needs to be made public, but talk to you in private to fix the problem. there was no inbox, no enforcement mechanisms. host: the supreme court issued a statement when they came out with these ethics rules, saying tht has long had the equivalent of common-law ethics rules

בטים בחברות שלם ועד אחד האשרו את כל השניאו ונעשה שם שמע השטיע where is the justice, where is the justice, where is the justiceason to do it, i don't think they find anything there, and i don't think it's worth the effort, don't you want to solve it once and for all? i don't care if it isn't solved, for me and i don't think for the state of israel, it doesn't work, it's a huge project if it's possible at all we change. very much.

justices. these are new, written rules for every justice, all of them have signed on to it. it is apparently a breakthrough by chief justice roberts who was clearly concerned that the ethics scandals by thomas and alito were snowballing into a problem for the whole court. there's a wider context here. this is a high court with three trump justices who were part of a new block that overturned 50 years of precedent in roe v. wade. those are justices who of course were appointed by a president who didn't win more votes in 2016, through our strange, electoral and political math, which i mentioned to you in our friday broadcast. other conservative justices have been acting blatantly politically from some of their rulings to their public rhetoric to the secretive political posture they have taken regarding their own grifting lifestyle. the high court is responding and in a sense, deferring to some of its critics and their substantiative arguments. that includes the ethics and legal leaders who have written and talked and worked on this. we had some of them on the program in the lead up to this. it's also clearly a nod to the str

justices would be reviewed by lower justices. recusal requests would no longer be the decision of justices themselves. is would be an invitation to turn every big case and there recusal standoff. a justice might reasonably recuse for a series of reasons such as financial interest in the matter in controversy, or if a close relationship within the third degree of a party, lawyer in the case. the editors also writing this morning that the real misunderstanding here is believing that critics are operating in good faith. despite the headlines in recent months about which justice went on the occasion with which wealthy friend, those people did not have business before the court. no one has come up with a genuine conflict of interest or a case where the recusal standard has been broken. that is the editors of the wall street journal can either take on that. this action by the court over the last few days was seated by several stories and publications taking a look at practices of some of the justices. we will show you that in just a bit. let's hear from donald in michigan, democrats line. caller: good mornin

teacher lawyer, judge and justice in the pantheon of philatelic, technically honored justices, she joins a distinguished membership, including not just hughes, also chief justices john marshall and john jay and associate oliver wendell holmes. louis brandeis. thurgood marshall, to name a few. william howard taft has a stamp to, but that honors him for that other job he held. it is a fitting moment for this ceremony to 30 years ago yesterday, the supreme court held a investiture. welcoming justice ginsburg to the court. 30 years ago this week, she sat as a member of the court for the first time when it convened by law for a new term on, the first monday in october. now, as a consequence of that same law, however, i am back on the bench tomorrow morning. and so in just a moment, i will turn the program over to the postal service. but i couldn't miss this occasion. i want to recognize the presence, the justices, children, jane and jim ginsburg, who will always be part the supreme court family as chancellor. this smithsonian. i am pleased to welcome everyone here to the national portrait gallery as chief justice and on behalf of the court. i thank the postal servic

justices do not have an ethical code of conduct that they have to abide by. and it's time that they have won. you, know there are three branches of government. the arguments that chief justice roberts says that will take care of ourselves, it's important that if you can have confidence in the supreme court decisions, that the senate judiciary find out what the people that have interests for the court. if they can give gifts and have prior relationships with these justicesat about? and is that really justice? is that fairness? and all the justice has to do is recuse herself. or himself. you know, i went on a yacht trip with this person, i have a relationship with this person, clearly i can't be fair and impartial on this particular case. so it's very important if you want to have confidence in the supreme court decisions, to know that they're not being bought by people who have interests before them. because they have private school tuition paid for for a family member. you don't do gifts like that unless you are a family member or a close personal front, unless you want something in return. that's just how it works. it's silly to think that they didn't want something in return for doing that. they're not close personal friends, and they're not family members. >> to that point, christina, the point that catherine just brought up about the code of conduct, the ethical code of conduct. senator durbin has pointed out that chief justice john robert couldn't

that the front party krzysztowski, at one time he served as deputy minister of finance in the justice and justicerque of the podlasie voivodeship, adjacent to grodno region, so i am well acquainted with the situation in poland from the inside. what is important is that talbinsky is one of those polish representatives who gives direct assessments. it must be remembered that the polish authorities were very actively involved in the color revolution in belarus with the goal of overthrowing president lukashenko; they did not succeed, so this government had to find an enemy. let us recall that belarus was identified by the polish authorities as an enemy even before the start of the special operation in ukraine. that is, this happened from the end of 2020 to the end of 2021. not brings society together in difficult times than to show that someone is an enemy. it is obvious that the migration policy of the european union countries bordering belarus is becoming more radical and tougher every year. the authorities of poland, lithuania, and latvia not only ignore international humanitarian law, they are li

teacher lawyer, judge and justice in the pantheon of philatelic, technically honored justices, she joins a distinguished membership, including not just hughes, also chief justices john marshall and john jay and associate oliver wendell holmes. louis brandeis. thurgood marshall, to name a few. william howard taft has a stamp to, but that honors him for that other job he held. it is a fitting moment for this ceremony to 30 years ago yesterday, the supreme court held a investiture. welcoming justice ginsburg to the court. 30 years ago this week, she sat as a member of the court for the first time when it convened by law for a new term on, the first monday in october. now, as a consequence of that same law, however, i am back on the bench tomorrow morning. and so in just a moment, i will turn the program over to the postal service. but i couldn't miss this occasion. i want to recognize the presence, the justices, children, jane and jim ginsburg, who will always be part the supreme court family as chancellor. this smithsonian. i am pleased to welcome everyone here to the national portrait gallery as chief justice and on behalf of the court. i thank the postal servic

ביט יגברות אפש אחד לא הטיצע לא ישרו את הכל השציע ונעשה שם השציע, where is the justice, where is the justice, where is the justiceolve it once and for all? i don't care if it isn't solved. for me, and i don't think for the state of israel, it doesn't work. it's a huge project. at the moment, we have an aerial photo of the editor of the azortoura naela תצלום air from 1946.

justice gorsuch? justice kavanaugh? >> just twolarifying questions about the limits of your argument. there's discussion sometimes about permanent appropriations and forever appropriations. my understanding but i want make sure you agree is a congress could not entrenched a funding scheme. in other words, congres cannot pass a law that says this a funding scheme and a future congress may alter this for ten years or 100 years. that would be constitutionally problematic is my understanding that i want to make sure you agree with desperate yes, i absently share that understand you can justice kavanau. and i think what it shows is it's incorrect to characterize standing appropriations as lasting forever. facteppointed a number of exampl wre congress has acted to change the stain appropriations and the customs service is a goodxale on this one. it was funded through a standg appropriations for the first 1 years of this nation's history and then in 1912 congress took it out of t standing appropriations and prodded into annual appropriations. ngress shifted this again and the debt limit t recently. th presented many standing appropriations that of a part of the american reselan and inflation reduction act. it demonstrates there's always that additional check of a future congress decides it wants to alter the work of a prior congress. >> so congress couldhange it tomorrow? >> absolutely congress could change it to more. >> and then ifhe statute here gave the federal res more than ministerial control, that the amount was in control of the l reserve to range from zero to the cap

. >> justice alito, justice hamas, justice kavanaugh people who are strong in their faith as well.g that your devout and doing things the right way. by the way jen psaki is the same person when she was press secretary stating in the white house press briefing room saying most americans get their news from social media platforms. were working with the platforms to limit what americans can see. i'm like holy cow the press person is limiting the press the first amendment right from the white house press room, that is jen psaki i don't put a whole lot away in what she has to say. >> chairman jim jordan at least another year of the judiciary committee. thank you for joining us on a sunday night i look forward to watching you over the next year and having you back on, you take care. >> take care brother. >> coming up is looking like a third-party candidate may have a real impact in 2024 but which existing party will be hurt the most. former south carolina congressman and no labels leader joe cunningham joins us next. >> welcome back to "sunday night in america", current president biden i

and the islamic republic of iran is usually from the caravan of seeking justice and seeking justice andthe struggle of the sea can't be left behind, and the fact that it has always been in front of the people of iran, i want to ask a more specific question , what capacities are there that can be used now , i want to know what is left, what is the other option . there is something that can be used in these human rights institutions , look at the palestinian people , we have about 45 reporters on human rights issues, who are always commenting on issues that are perhaps less important than the massacre of children and women in gaza. and preparing a report and here it should be demanded from these means it should be the international community should clearly ask these special reporters from unicef, where is unicef in the story? unless the survival and development of children is not among the priorities of unicef, unless the protection of children against violence is not. is there a higher level of violence than what is happening in the occupied territories today , and is unicef waiting for

every single and each tool that can push towards the diplomatic efforts in order to achieve justice, bring justice riyadh, we need to do something and i will meet the us president thank you very much and peace be upon you all. i'd like to thank president joka. the indonesian president talking there need to find a solution of which we refer to two-state solution in his eyes is what needs to be done, though i see much. must push towards certain dialogues as he said and uh at the end there uh what he said was uh interesting where he said that he's going to be meeting the us president and he will be conveying to the us president the message of the oic uh so far number of speakers have spoken indonesian president you just listen to prior term the turkish president jordan's king uh also um egypt's president spoke uh along with the pa chief mahmoud abbas and we also had nbs make some opening. remarks along with the unrah um the chief the commissioner general of unra philip lazarini when this summit began, it's a joint oic um and the arab league summit that's taking place and number of heads of states uh

all children of gaza, we are all children of gaza gazas balrouh laldem nebadik ya ghazan new justice new justice fire now fire now, please fire now, please fire now, please fire now, please fire now, seas fire, now see fire now, see fire, now se fire, now se fire, now see fire now, fire, fire, now, see fire, now, see fire now , we have a good amount of and these connections go beyond training, they go as far as surveillance technologies like israeli cellbrite, that's used on communities here, they go as far as zionists explicitly governing these bodies, lapd's youth policing program, the first director they brought on in 2021 was someone whoah. allah is great, god is great, i testify that there is no god but god. do we have installments without checks? yes, we also have installments without checks . you can buy with peace of mind. shahr farsh, third-party insurance . it does n't matter which site to buy the car. buy a site, let me compare . this is good. bim.com is different. bim.com compares and buys personal insurance online from all companies. we arrived at a new city, the city of lavaz moune

justice _ to stand up. our foundation, we wage justice and _ to stand up. our foundation, we wage justice say it is. waging because you can'tjust assume — waging because you can'tjust assume it— waging because you can'tjust assume it is— waging because you can'tjust assume it is going _ waging because you can'tjust assume it is going to- waging because you can'tjust assume it is going to happen. sort _ assume it is going to happen. sort of— assume it is going to happen. sort of have _ assume it is going to happen. sort of have to _ assume it is going to happen. sort of have to form - assume it is going to happen. sort of have to form alliancesj sort of have to form alliances and really _ sort of have to form alliances and really fight _ sort of have to form alliances and really fight against - sort of have to form alliances and really fight against these | and really fight against these kinds — and really fight against these kinds of— and really fight against these kinds of injustices. _ and really fight against these kinds of injustices. with i and really fight against these kinds of inj

justices have. so much of the supreme court that we realized has been based on norms. people behaving a particular way and recusing themselves and -- the two particular justice system question. so it is incumbent upon john roberts to move forward especially since he has the support of three of his colleagues. because we know especially justicehen he has relationships with people who are coming before the court. and it's only eroding the public's confidence and trust in the court. and we know that the court cases that are coming before the court are getting more polarizing, more important as it seems as though this particular conservative court relishes in taking rights away from americans as opposed to expanding our various rights. >> lisa, i want to get your thoughts on this argument that we hear time and time again. the justice branch, including the supreme court, a separate but coequal branch of government, therefore congress does not have the power to impose -- on the court. that is something that harlan crow has said in the past. as someone who has extensively worked in court policy, break down that argument for us that the supreme court and the judicial branch in our government, in our constitution, basically does not have oversight. because on its surface, that seems fundamentally flawed that there would be a branch

justice. then they had to exhume megan evers to get some justice. now in 2023, we had to exhume dexter wade to get some justice. we need the department of justice to investigate because they killed her brother, they killed her son, and ms. wade and her family believes in both situations they are trying to cover them up. the officer was convicted fireffor killing her brother, and they have been fighting her ever since. she doesn't trust any of the mississippi local officials. >> ms. wade, we are so sorry that you have lost your son, especially to have lost him in this way. i'll be thinking of you. thank you so much for your time and, ben crump, thank you as well. >>> critics in texas warn it could lead to state sanctioned racism. when you need to know about a border bill that the governor is set to sign and concerns it could put la tee knows in the state at risk. >>> the governor of texas is expected to sign a new bill makes entering texas illegal as a state crime. it also gives cops in texas the power to arrest migrants. state judges would have the ability to deport to mexico. more than 40% of the population i

, including justice clarence thomas, justice sonia sota-mayor, and a justice may accept reasonable compensation and reimbursements of expenses for permitted activities if the source of the payments does not give the appearance of influencing the justice's official duties or otherwise appear improper. john and gillian, senator dick durbin with the judiciary committee has been pushing for a specific code of conduct for justices waiting to hear exactly what he has to say. this is the first time we have seen at the supreme court an official code of conduct signed by all nine of the supreme court justices. see if they can live up to it, john. >> john: some interesting news. david, thank you. gillian. >> gillian: also this, a brutal beating outside a high school resulting in the death of a 17-year-old student. his family says he was attacked for defending a friend. las vegas police are investigating his death as a homicide. william, how many suspects are there? >> according to las vegas police, as many as 15 teens, but in this video you are about to see, probably no