kerry: yes. ms. boxer: does australia, one of our strongest allies, support this accord? secretary kerry: yes. ms. boxer: does germany support this accord? secretary kerry: yes. ms. boxer: does france support this accord? secretary kerry: yes. ms. boxer: does new zealand support this accorded? secretary kerry: i have not seen -- oh, you mean in the vote. yes. ms. boxer: either by voice support or a vote. did jordan voice it support? secretary kerry: yes. ms. boxer: did spain, denied year, did the committee? secretary kerry: yes. ms. boxer: you get the drift. if you are bamboozled, the world has been bamboozled. that is ridiculous. and it is unfair. and it is wrong. you can disagree for sure with aspects of this agreement, but now i have the agreement right here and i have read it, and one thing i was surprised as i sat down to read it, i thought, will i be able to understand this document? it is very understandable. i would like to cite a couple of things in here. iran reaffirms that under no cir

kerry: yes. sen. boxer: does australia, one of our strong as allies, support this? sec. kerry: yes. sen. boxer: does germany support this accord? sec. kerry: yes. sen. boxer: does france support this accord? sec. kerry: yes. sen. boxer: does new zealand to support this accord? sec. kerry: i haven't seen their statement. sen. boxer: well, they are on the security council and they voted for it. did jordan voice its support? sec. kerry: yes. sen. boxer: did spain? did nigeria? did lithuania? sec. kerry: yes. sen. boxer: you get the drift. if you were bamboozled him of the world has been bamboozled. that is ridiculous. and it is unfair, and it is wrong. he can disagree -- you can disagree, for sure, with aspects of this agreement, but i think we need to stay away from that kind of rhetoric. i had the agreement right here and i have read it, and one thing that i was surprised as i sat down to read it, i thought would i be able to understand this document? it is very understandable, so i want to cite a

we see john kerry. you're saying the deadline isn't as hard and fast. >> there's a 30-day review period if they get us the text. >> let's listen to john kerry in vienna, austria. >> well good evening, everybody, and let me start by thanking all of you for your remarkable patience. i know in fact all of us involved in this know that this has been a very difficult couple of weeks for the many journalists who are here in vienna with us. but let me assure you we would not be here continuing to negotiate just for the sake of negotiating. we're here because we believe we're making real progress toward a comprehensive deal. but as i have said many times, and as i discussed with president obama last night, we are not going to sit at the negotiating table forever. we also recognize that we shouldn't get up and leave simply because the clock strikes midnight and i emphasize given that the work here is incredibly technical and the stakes are very very high we will not rush and we will not be rushed and we won't le

you met with secretary kerry. give us a status report. have made significant progress, certainly people two years ago could not imagine we could come this far. it is when you decide to go for dialogue rather than pressure and intimidation, that did not work. it was in place for quite some time -- sanctions, all sorts of sanctions were imposed on iran and i believe they did not achieve their objective and that is why people opted for negotiations and serious discussion. we have made significant progress. what we achieved in november 2013 in terms of an interim agreement was something that so-called naysayers always believe would never be possible and then after we agreed to it a lot of people believed that iran would never implement it. well, we did. international atomic energy agency, even president obama and everybody else said that iran has complied fully. so, we are now almost ready to go for a long-term agreement that will ensure that iran's program will always remain peaceful. from our perspective, that is not much because we never h

kerry: no. senator: one thing i do not think has been covered enough in all of the testimony that has occurred, i got the point that senator nelson was trying to make, that the money is not in our control, and it appears, looking at it, if all the other countries walk away from us, if we reject this deal, that they are going to get the money one way or another, either because they are entitled to it if we do the deal or because we cannot control it. but i don't know that that is completely accurate, and i think it's important. this is not about is this a good deal. this is also about what happens if we don't do this deal. i think it's important to talk about whether the power of the united states would have if this deal was rejected to in fact force our will on these countries that hold this money. we have a lot of tools at our disposal as the major economic power that we are, a lot of these are our nato allies. obviously, japan. so, i think it's fair that we shouldn't just say if we walk away f

kerry and mr.ma because those two gentlemen are so desperate for a legacy-making foreign policy achievement. charlie: we end with you margaret brennan. what are the big stakes here and what are the consequences -- we talked about success and now failure? lyse: when it comes to the repercussions, the resistance and the skepticism and hostility towards the deal among the gulf states has not been mitigated at all by the camp david meeting. there is a danger of proliferation. there is a risk that this will increase the tensions. that is one of the main fault lines in the region sadly right now. margaret: it is an important point. the gulf states have been quieter about their opposition. it does not mean they are for it. it means they are still waiting to see the final text. which is what the air of diplomats would say to you. it is a different position than what the israelis have taken. maybe you come back. maybe you have a stronger hand. maybe you renegotiate this with another president in the office.

john kerry walked in on crutches. he's got a problem with his leg but he did not get any sympathy from the senators. it's been getting personal. richard: it had that flavor at the beginning of the meeting. opening remarks by the senate foreign relations chairman. you mentioned it briefly in your introduction, that he launched into some damning comments about john kerry. sitting just a few feet in front of him, saying he had been fleeced by the iranians. and that far from blocking any of those pathways that we just heard in the report, that he had effectively paved the pathway for iran to develop a nuclear weapon at a point in the future. we shouldn't be too surprised because this is a very emotive issue. not just decades of animosity it is dealing with america's relationship with its most important out lie, one of assist in the world with israel. how best to defend it from perceived threat. it is also dealing with america's place in the world. if america has the power to bring about outcomes that it desires. brent: ho

kerry and mr.ma because those two gentlemen are so desperate for a legacy making foreign policy achievement. charlie: we end with you, margaret brennan. margaret:lyse: when it comes to the repercussions, the resistance and the skepticism and hostility towards the deal along -- among the gulf states has not been mitigated at all by the camp david meeting. there is a danger of proliferation. there is a risk that this will increase the tensions. margaret: it is an important point. the gulf states have been quieter about their opposition. it does not mean they are for it. they're waiting to see the final text. it is a different position than what the israelis have taken. what does this mean? you have both sides here continuing to push because both sides really wanted. the iranians needed and the americans will like it and the world can unity would really like to negotiation -- the world community would really like to negotiation this through. the obama administration will tell you this is a transaction

john kerry walked in on crutches. he's got a problem with his leg but he did not get any sympathy from the senators. it's been getting personal. richard: it had that flavor at the beginning of the meeting. opening remarks by the senate foreign relations chairman. you mentioned it briefly in your introduction, that he launched into some damning comments about john kerry. sitting just a few feet in front of him, saying he had been fleeced by the iranians. and that far from blocking any of those pathways that we just heard in the report, that he had effectively paved the pathway for iran to develop a nuclear weapon at a point in the future. we shouldn't be too surprised because this is a very emotive issue. not just decades of animosity it is dealing with america's relationship with its most important out lie, one of assist in the world with israel. how best to defend it from perceived threat. it is also dealing with america's place in the world. if america has the power to bring about outcomes that it desires. brent: ho

john kerry has been back and back. zarif went back to tehran in the last few days to make the case and to try to move it along. so if they're trying this hard, it would it seems to me that there is a great intensity to try to find a solution to these very difficult points. >> that's exactly the case, charlie. lyse, i know you want to jump in too. john kerry brought a physical therapist and two doctors with him. he literally got off his recovery bed to make it here because he is trying to close what could be a legacy-making deal for president obama but also have reverberations throughout the middle east. so great intensity you're exactly right, on finishing that, but it's sort of a game of chicken in some ways in terms of ironing out the details and no one wants to pull that curtain. >> someone came from having seen members of the iranian and american declaration i said what was the mood? the person said the mood was this has to be done. never have they been so close to a deal. this would end a 12-year standoff over ira

what we have agreed upon -- >> rose: does it agree with what secretary kerry said? >> i allow secretary kerry to say what he wants to say and define the agreement the way he wants to define it. whatly say is what will be in the agreement if there is an agreement at the end of the day. if we have an agreement that agreement must be based upon this logic very clear logic. >> rose: okay -- you cannot have two opposing facts running at the same time. you either -- >> rose: the building up of sanctions or what do do you mean? what two opposing tracks. >> one is to have an agreement the other one is to impose pressure. imposition of pressure has its counterparts. the the counterpart to imposition of pressure would be iran building more centrifuges. >> rose: if in fact there was a nuclear agreement, is it likely to lead to -- likely to lead to more cooperation in terms of u.s.-iranian relations u.s.-iranian cooperation u.s.-iranian joint efforts if it finds itself on the same side? and do you somehow make the argument that if we can get past this nuclear agreement we can w

kerry: i'll go first.olutely knows the price because it has been a subject of discussion over the course of the time we have been examining our relationship and working toward today that there are things cuba would like to see happen, there are things the united states would like to see happen. we both have been crystal clear with the -- with each other, there has been no pulling of punches. that is one of the reasons we told up and ability to be able to get to this moment. with respect to the embargo, president obama could not have been more clear -- the president has called on congress to lift the embargo. it is our hope that over the course of the development of the relationship in these next week's and months and years, and hopefully not too many years people will see the benefits that are emerging in both countries as a result of this change today. we would hope, obviously, that the embargo at the appropriate time will be lifted and a great deal more foundation can be built for this relationship. with

center -- secretary kerry: well we believe so. the president believes it, you are our intel believes it. our intel community has made it very clear to us that there's no return to negotiations with this ayatollah. and that they will then believe we have given them the reason that they have to develop a nuclear weapon. senator manchin: secretary, between november 2012 and 2013 even when we had the noose around their neck, they still produced 6,000 more centrifuges. their determination is to do it no matter how much we have been strangled. secretary moniz that is quite : correct. absolutely. they declared they would go to hundreds of thousands of versus the current 20,000. senator manchin and you believe : in the heart of hearts and -- >> your one question has now expired. senator graham: general dempsey do you believe the iranians have been trying to build a bomb or a nuclear power program for peaceful purposes all these years? general density i believe they : have a militarization aspiration. senator graham who is the : commander

all of the players led toy ss led by kerry have been meeting and kerry has been calling russia's foreign minister as well. he's back in moscow. last night president obama held a videoconference with kerry and the team here to give them his red lines and to get an update from them of course. joining me now from capitol hill ask arizona senator john mccain. chairman of the armed services committee. senator, we want to talk about iran, also talk about isis and what you heard at the hearings on tuesday from the pentagon officials. but first, this iran deal here. what are youing looking for? have you been briefed at all? what do you want to hear from john kerry? >> well, we've not been briefed at all. it's obvious that the latest russian -- excuse me the latest iranian demands concerning lifting of sanctions by the u.n. is a new area that they think they can explore and get concessions. after all, i agree with b.b. netanyahu. we started here and here and we moved and keep on moving in their direction as george shultz and henry kissinger pointed out, we've gone from elimination of iran's nucle

secretary kerry. your impressions of him today?ow, i made a point that the ayatollah is now say that the deal does not prevent them from having a nuclear weapon, and i thought that's precisely what the deal was supposed to do, and so i don't understand how we can have an agreement that president obama says means one thing, john kerry says means one thing but the ayatollah says it doesn't mean that at all. that's worrisome, we're at the beginning of the agreement. how do you think this is going to be in a year or two from now when there are allegations that they are cheating on the agreement. we haven't started on the agreement and they are under different impression as to what the agreement means. >> and the leadership of iran already saying that the iranian policy in the middle east is 180 degrees from that of the united states. as you say, how can this be even at the beginning? . >> you wonder about the sincerity of who you're dealing with when they're immediately putting out, still calling us this arrogant nation, this great sat

this is a big problem for secretary kerry. because if iran both has an inflow of a large amount of money from the sanctions being lifted. gwen: right. >> and the ability to go by and sell arms sell arms it will imflame what's happening in iraq syria yemen, hezbollah and so forth. gwen: before you go on i want us to play a little bit of what secretary kerry said to my colleague judy woodruff today in washington. talking about sanctions. and then we will respond on the other side. >> sure. secretary kerry: you have a choice. are you prepared to do what the u.n. resolution says? which is lift the sanctions over a period of time and in return for their negotiating? by the way they didn't just come to the negotiations. they have cut a deal. or do you want to go to war? because the alternative to this deal is they will do whatever they want. we will lose the sanctions. we will lose the support of the global community. if the congress of the united states turns this down, there will be conflict in the region because as -- the only al

john kerry answering a few questions but not really giving a lot away.has to answer questions at the moment, he can't walk away from the press because he is on those crushes worth noting that was a bicycle injury while he was one stage of these talks it was an injury sustained while doing these long negotiations and taking a break they can't wait forever, but they are waiting for now was the message. and other foreign ministers will be staying. we also heard from the french foreign minister, he described it as marathon negotiations and also tell you what the iranians have to say but the foreign minister who has been here with john kerry, neither man and there's so much going on in the world. neither has left the city except for one very brief visit. he said we are working hard, but not rushed to get the job done. mark myrd whos you can't change forces in the middle of a stream. it is worth reare minding you, that they didn't think today's deadline was important, they thought it was more important to get a good deal, it wasn't a deadline that had been agr

the -- secretary kerry -- this question is for you. following up on chairman mccall's comments about the secret deal secretary rice said that she has seen this deal with the iaea and that it will be shared with congress. so if she has seen it have you seen it? >> i don't believe that susan rice national security advisor has seen it -- >> she said she did six days ago. she said she had seen it reviewed it that congress will get to see it in a classified session. my question is have you seen it? >> no i haven't seen it. i have been briefed on it. >> but you haven't read it. you haven't seen it. >> it's in the possession of the iaea. >> are you going to read it? >> we don't have access to the actual agreement. >> but secretary rice has access to it. >> i don't know about that. >> that's just what she said. i'm just going on what she said. is the policy of the united states still that iran will never have nuclear weapons? >> yes. >> is it the policy of the ayatollah, if you can answer for him, that iran wants to destroy the united states?

you had jack lew, john kerry, and ernst monez who was with kerry most of the time when the discussions were going on, the negotiations were going on. he is, himself, a nuclear physicist. how do you think they did? >> they had a couple of points they wanted to make, and make them clearly. jack lew saying sanctions have been successful, and now it's time to push into the next arena. the point of sanctions, was to get iran to the negotiating table. we have achieved that. jack lew saying it's time to move forward. we heard the secretary monez answering specific questions about the deal, and saying that energy experts as well as intelligence experts will be able to tell if iran is breaching its part of the deal. secretary kerry is saying the 24 day window is not as big of a concern as members of congress make it out to be. all the guys said that 24 days is better than an endless stalling, which is what iran was able to do in the past, when they sat down and started talking. there's a point that came up a lot in the hearing - questions and concerns - iran has said that inspectors will not be

kerry. appreciate you being here. you said you were going -- we were going to be briefed on that side agreements that the iaea has with iran. is that correct? >> yes. >> i want you to use your power to make sure we are not reached with the same staff that briefed hillary clinton on benghazi. make sure that we get it decent briefing. you say frequently that this is the strongest negotiation that you could get -- you felt like it was. the president said he would walk away from a bad deal. i would submit this. you come to us and say that other countries don't appreciate the congress is weighing in. i has set from the get go, i think there are a lot stronger positions you should've taken. you tell me if you operated from this basis. one, i believe jeff duncan over here when he said american hostages should have been released. number two, the demand should be in for iran to dismantle all of its centrifuges. three, give the iaea unfettered, 24/7 access. four, stop the exporting of terrorism. five, denounced terrorism and pr

that's what secretary kerry just said. we will talk to a man who knows about the high attacks negotiations. carl we brought you in to talk domestic politics. but you know too, how the negotiations go. what do you think in president obama and senator kerry in extending the deadline. they were speaking to western media, but the focus of the particular nows conference was the officials in teheran. and what kerry was doing in a public stage, saying to the leaders of iran you are stubborn and dug in on technical issues, but they are clear, big issues that we are dealing with here and he was saying be responsible or we will walk away from the table this is gone on too long. all but two of the foreign secretary of state or foreign relations secretaries have left and most of them are coming back. and an attempt to the iranians get serious or we're far apart. they are far apart on the big issues. we have evidence that the iranians are taking a different view of what facilities are inspected and what conditions and a clear signal th

secretary of state john kerry expected to speak this morning. we will be monitoring the situation in vienna. we'll bring you, and live as soon as it happened. not only will this be a mover for the broader market but we watch oil prices as well. joining us now by phone is still fled from the price futures group. good morning to you. thank you for joining so early. what are you looking for in watching this morning? >> obviously the news since oil prices lower at this initially in the market has to judge how quickly everyone can get their production up to capacity and how quickly it can bring civil oil to the market. it's been widely reported they have close to 30 to 40 million barrels of oil in storage that could be reached quickly into the market. the big question is how they plan to do it. we've heard in the past iran has said they are not going to crush oil prices and will be smart about the way they let oil back onto the market. it will be interesting to see with saudi arabia does because saudi arabia has a gentleman with iran or other opec me

having been in the military for many years, i'm appalled at senator kerry -- or secretary kerry for notly apologizing for what he said. but the point is that no matter what this committee did, does or do, it's all directed from 1600 pennsylvania avenue. that man is going to get because he wants it. he has thrown out and sold out this country so many times that it's deplorable. why he hasn't been impeached, why he hasn't been kicked to the curb. thank god, 18 months we get an opportunity to do that. it hurts me deeply in my soul for this kind of shenanigan to be going on. and all these guys are are his puppets. >> okay. got your point. thank you. olinto in nantucket, massachusetts, supporter of the iran nuclear agreement. go ahead. >> caller: yes. i'm also a supporter, they should increase their medications, those people from texas. if we don't agree if they don't get an agreement in iran, what's going to happen is that all those countries we form the coalition, i'm not going to bother anymore and iran will be able to make a nuclear bomb. and with netanyahu wants, he wants a war. so, if

>> i think secretary kerry showed a great deal of patience.courage and exercised a great deal of wisdom in order to be able to move this process forward. and i believe his commitment to this process as well as president obama and president rouhani. >> and the supreme leader the ayatollah is going to support this agreement? >> it's a decision that he will make but he has supported us all along. he's always been for diplomacy. he said publicly that diplomacy is very preferable to other methods of engamging in global politics. >> and to people like prime minister netanyahu who said today it is a mistake of historic proportions, can you answer that? >> well, i think if people see this as a problem, it shows that they need tension, they need conflict, or they see peace as an existential tlithreat. this has become the joke for the mr. netanyahu to advocate nonproliferation for 200, just about, nuclear warheads sitting in his stockpile. >> and can you see -- foresee the day when iran and the united states could actually have diplomatic relations? >>

secretary kerry still on crutches from his bike accident. he is hobbling in there, and he is likely the first to give a statement. and the energy secretary also happens to be a nuclear physicist. all right. stand by we're going to take a quick break here. we'll be right back with more live coverage on the house hearing. >>> the house foreign affairs committee is meeting. let's listen in. >> -- the administration was successful in blocking that legislation. so instead of us considering a verifiable enforceable and accountable agreement, we are being asked to consider an agreement that gives iran permanent sanctions relief for temporary nuclear restrictions. should iran be given this special deal? in september committee members will face the important decision of approving or disapproving this agreement. we will have that vote only because of the iran nuclear agreement review act, passed in may, which the administration did not want. to be frank, the administration's preference has been to sideline america's eventtives -- representatives. so i

secretary of state john kerry is warning the u.s.ould walk away from the negotiating table if iran does not make the tough decisions needed for a final agreement. >> the simple fact is that despite all of the progress we have made and it's real some of the tough issues remain unresolved. >> cnn's nic robertson is live in vienna with the latest. nic, a lot of people thought a deal would be reached today. where do things stand now? >> reporter: i don't think we will get that announcement today. all bets are off. that is the issue of the talks so far. what is happening this minute secretary kerry meeting with iranian counterpart with the foreign minister and eu foreign policy chief. they have been in the meeting for about an hour. the first meeting of the day. secretary kerry saying he is willing to walk away. eu foreign policy chief, about 15 hours ago, said the amount of time before they walk away is a matter of hours. did she actually mean 24 or 48 hours? what we call a couple of days or did she mean hours? it is just not clear. what

kerry. appreciate you being here. i hope that you will -- you say we're going to be briefed on that side agreement that the iaea has with iran. is that correct? >> yes that is correct. >> i want to implore you to use your power to make sure we're not briefed by the same staff that briefed susan rice and hillary clinton on benghazi or sergeant bowe bergdahl. make sure we get a briefing there. you say frequently this is the strongest negotiation you could get, you feel like it was. the president said he would walk away from a bad deal. and i would submit this, now, you come to us and you say there's not 535 secretaries of state and other countries don't appreciate that congress is weighing in. but if you were going to get a strong deal i have said from the get g i think there's a lot stronger position you should have taken, so i'm going to lay out some preclusions and you tell me if you operated between that basis. i agree with jeff duncan when he said american hostages should have been released first and foremost. numb

john kerry doesn't listen very well. what do you think israel has told john kerry?give iran a nuclear capability. don't give them more money until they change their behavior. he's not listening to the region. the arabs and israelis are telling him something he doesn't want to hear. >> this now moves to the senate the process, 60 days review period. you obviously are opposed to the deal. how will this campaign be waged in the senate and how do you see the vote occurring in the u.s. senate in 60 days or 70 days. >> the following caveat if all this becomes true there is no requirement for them to change their behavior regarding the nuclear program, just with the mere passage of time they can expand it i would argue to my colleagues you're insuring a nuclear arms race. i would aurlgrgue if you give them cash knlt soon they're going to put it in the war machine, which puts us at risk. our friends in israel cannot live with this. don't put israel in this box. tell the president to go back and try to get a better deal. tell them there's a better deal to be had. hillary cli

thanks secretary kerry for these side dreams. you can at least confirm that one of the agreements is about the military site and the other is about the military site of the military program. >>> i believe it's just one basic agreement which contains the approach to the p.m. d. >> can you confirm that the congress -- >>> i think two apen dizzies. >> is it your testimony that congress will not get to review those agreements. >>> congress will be briefed order those agreements. >>> we will not be given the actual agreements. >> i don't believe we'll get the actual agreement. >>> the problem is that the iran nuclear review act that the congress passed, required executive branch to provide all documents, to include any side agreements. so the executive branch has a finding legal obligation under the act it provide all documents. >> we don't have a side agreements. >> doesn't matter. it's a then de ten don't agency, and makes an inde punt den -- >> nuclear review act any agreement that iran would any other parties any related agreement

and i can't -- >> living to john kerry the u.s. secretary of state and bruno rodriguez, the foreign minister of cuba, the joint news conference. secretary kerry stating that change is never easy but one must learn from the past not live in it. many of the stumbling blocks still have come up in the news conference including guantanamo and listing on the blockade. we're going to have more analysis and discussion on al jazeera, in the next few minutes. stay with us on al jazeera. he. >> flag and handshake marking the historic restoration of diplomatic relations between u.s. and cuba. >> it is a hisk day a day of removing barriers. >> i'm lauren taylor, this is al jazeera live from london. also coming up. turkey suggests i.s.i.l. is to blame for a suicide board of education which has killed 30 people and injured around 100. >> draft resolution has been adopted unanimously. >> uni

august 14 john kerry heads to havana his aides said. this afternoon, kerry will receive the foreign minister, bruno rodriguez at the state department. jon: a first since the '60s. a spokesman for kerry said the topics of two men will hardly represent any change at all from those of the last six decades. >> we began a conversation that i suspect will continue about on human rights which we know is going to be a part of this new relationship. we have had conversations about migration and i think we made it clear publicly that going forward we both agree, both countries to have conversation about fugitives in law enforcement. >> reporter: one other piece of business that occurred today. at 4:00 a.m. eastern time inside the atrium at the state department known formally as the hall of flags, the insertion of cuba's flag in the alphabetical place. the 4:00 a.m. time we're told for safety reasons as a scaffold was involved. follow me on twitter,@james rosen fnc. right after this live shot i will tell you which country, both the united states a

could it be john kerry. lou: there's a spectacular thought. >> she is in trouble, the front-runner, likely to get the nomination, but when the "washington post" attacks her, you know she's in trouble. lou: in trouble is relevant, she still has 60% of the support. let me ask you this, if i may, john. >> actually she doesn't have 60%. she's got 47%, she's under 50% which means the majority of the democrats are saying no. judy's absolutely right, there's a lot of running behind the scenes trying to find an alternative. lou: i got the 60, i got the 47 less than 50. >> good. lou: who's her nearest competition? professor. >> probably biden or kerry. lou: probably? you were such an empir sift a few seconds ago. >> i can't tell you between one or the other. [ laughter ] >> i think it will be one of those two guys. lou: as the nominee? >> as the nominee. lou: wow! who will be the republican? >> one of my four or five favorites. i haven't decided yet. lou: incredible! leading republican, zero down on that sight. who's

negotiators, secretary of state john kerry and secretary of energy ernest moniz. we'll hear from prime minister benjamin netanyahu a top critic of the deal. a shooting rampage at marine recruiting center takes five lives. we'll talk to the top democrat on step at intelligence committee about these type of lone wolf terror attacks. donald trump goes on the defensive after he criticisms former pob. >> he is a -- because he was captured. we'll have analysis ton that all the news it's all ahead on "face the nation." captioning sponsored by cbs we're going to start this morning with historic deal between united states and iran limit that country's nuclear capabilities. congress has 06 days to review the deal and vote on it. friday we sat down with secretary of state john kerry and energy secretary earnest moniz who kale face. >> mr. secretary iran is sworn enemy of the united states. why should americans within they see iranians dancing in the street why shouldn't they be suspicious. >> everybody should be. we're suspicious. which is why we negotiated the deal that is

what i find was interesting was kerry's very clear statement that this deem has no sunset. what i can get this, is that really true? >> it's a complicated deal, some provisions that are five years some eight years some 10 years some longer. >> they laps. >> the snap back provision there are two sanctions the u.n. sanctions and then the individual countries that have sanctioned iran. the individual country sanctions can be put back immediately at any point, and there are triggers for the u.n. sanctions. the u.n. sanctions are tied to the international atomic energy agency, so the minute they say hey, something's wrong the u.n. sanctions can come back. there was a separate deal that was signed before this one was signed this morning between iran and the i.a.e.a. the condition of signing this deal was that got done first. it's a very technical deal. you can see some of the stuff is highly highly technical. it is -- this is up a congress to debate whether this is as safe as john kerry says it is, but i certainly makes the case. >> president obama pointed out that there's always

second point and this is secretary kerry, quickly. i'm very happy to hear you say about our strong commitment in the region. these security issues are changing. they're changing for israel. they're changing for our allies. no question with isis and north africa, in syria, in addition to iran. if you'll just quickly, how we are committed to making sure that israel is secure in that region with a true and trusted partnership with the united states to meet any challenge that they may confront as a result of the changing circumstances? >> thank you, senator. first of all i begin by saying that i'm proud i had 100% voting record for 29 years here on the subject of israel. and i have worked as hard as anybody here. i think you know over the last years to try to meet theeds needs with respect to peace and stability demands for israel. we are completely -- i mean i think it's fair to say that even with this disagreement we are constantly in touch and working with the intel community with their folks. and we continue to dialogue about the thre

thank you secretary kerry. secretary kerry has been very thorough. dr. moniz, if you could be brief and we'll get back on time and we recognize you at this point. >> thank you chairman and ranking member and members of the committee. thank you for discussing the jvp cpoa reached between the the three plus two. this provides strong verification measures to give us time to respond and takes none of our options off the table. i want to stress i was backed up in the negotiations by the nuclear competency built up over decades at doe and supported by this congress. the experts at doe labs and sites were engaged throughout the negotiations. nine labs and sites in seven states took part in supporting our negotiating position. these experts again were essential and as a result of their work i am very confident that the technical underpinning of this deal are solid and the department is ready to assist in the implementation. they will extend at least ten years for them to produce fissile material to at least one year and that is the fissile material being reduced

in the hot seat secretaries kerry, moniz, and lew. they'll be facing tough questions from a skeptical congress. last night in new york thousands jammed into times square urging congress to kill the deal. let's get the latest from capitol hill and luke russert. luke, good morning. what's going on here? a big headline in the "washington post." secret deals become the latest congressional complaint about the iran deal. >> good morning. that's front and center and expect that headline to be front and center at the senate foreign relations committee hearing with kerry, moniz and lew, and these senators want to get to the bottom of look, in the context of this agreement with iran regarding their nuclear program, were there side deals made by the state department regarding iranian military facilities and other matters? tom cotton of arkansas someone who has been very outspoken about the deal, alleged the administration has misled the public by not being fully open about the side deals. listen to what he had to say. >> unless congress gets th

>> well, john kerry always been a big u.n. supporter. i depth agree with him. i abide by the united states constitution and the law as put forth by this country north by the united nations. that's number one. number two neil, we spoke about three or four months ago and i indicated, listen, lease going to do a deal any deal. he needs foreign policy and it will be a bad deal. this is a bad deal. and you know what chuck how manier and others will do? they'll wait until the very end and see how many of their colleagues break until there's enough to actually sustain -- to override the veto and then he is going to vote against it so he can save face, protected israel. this does nothing to protect israel or our ago lies or the united states of america. so i'm not sure -- i still haven't not quite figure out why the president and john kerry are -- and the united nations -- i know why they're doing it -- it moving forward. what are we get out of this dole exactly? >> the question also is, why cede that to the nun is it your understanding that the congress vote isn't imp

kerry: i'll go first.absolutely knows the price because it has been a subject of discussion over the course of the time we have been examining our relationship and working toward today that there are things cuba would like to see happen, there are things the united states would like to see happen. we both have been crystal clear with the -- with each other, there has been no pulling of punches. that is one of the reasons we told up and ability to be able to get to this moment. with respect to the embargo, president obama could not have been more clear -- the president has called on congress to lift the embargo. it is our hope that over the course of the development of the relationship in these next week's and months and years, and hopefully not too many years people will see the benefits that are emerging in both countries as a result of this change today. we would hope, obviously, that the embargo at the appropriate time will be lifted and a great deal more foundation can be built for this relationship. w