chiu: kopp. >> commissioner kopp? >> aye, kopp. >> commissioner lee? >> kopp. >> commissioner renne? >> kopp. >> and commissioner ryan? >> judge kopp. >> commissioner kopp is elected vice chair of the commission. thank you. >> vice-chairperson d. chiu: judge kopp, i look forward to serving with you in the coming year. agenda item number 4, consideration of possible action on anti corruption accountability ordinance as amended on april 3rd, 2018 at the ethics commission special joint meeting with the board of supervisors, to amend the campaign and governmental code to institute campaign finance and conflict of interest reforms, see file 180280 as well as attachments from the staff. so as many of you have been with us on this long journey, we started a year ago with this anti corruption and accountability ordinance and it took many forms, and went through a lot of public discussion and debate. we forwarded a recommendation to the board of supervisors, they met in february to consider it and asked for more time. at the february meeting the commission vote

. >> commissioner kopp: wait a minute. >> commissioner kopp. >> commissioner kopp: i've got a question. why didn't lawrence's donation -- was it less than $100? >> $99, which was included in the amount? >> commissioner kopp: so why wasn't it identified as a qualifying donation? >> commissioner, i don't know. >> commissioner kopp: okay. i will ask the staff. >> there's several we don't understand. in other words, we can't fix them. >> commissioner kopp: yeah. >> you know, we can't fix them. now, the angela alioto checks, we have the donors writing personal letters saying the intent of the donor is a campaign, it was in a campaign envelope. y you know -- it brought us down $11,000 and disqualified us. so then, when miss pelham told me we have one day left, i have to tell you, i could -- for me not to be able to talk, that's a big deal. i couldn't even talk. >> commissioner kopp: here. i'll give you a chance to talk a little more. do you have an approximation of what you took in march 27th? [ inaudible ] >> commissioner kopp: $370. [ inaudible ] >> we weren't raising money for the 27th be

kopp: i have a question. >> commissioner kopp. >> commissioner kopp: i have a question. you're referring to the campaign government code. >> yes, that's correct. >> commissioner kopp: if five days had been accorded, would that have been april 11th? >> yes. >> commissioner kopp: okay. and how many approximately donations were not counted with respect to your argument about march 27th? >> that, i don't know because that was a new issue that was raised just today, so that was not something i've looked at. and i believe that -- >> commissioner kopp: so is there anybody in the campaign who can provide that? >> sure. >> i know that there were donations that we received on march 27th. i don't know exactly how many. we did not submit those in our filings -- our understanding was that only donations through march 26th would be accepted. >> commissioner kopp: well, do you have a written record of those? >> a written record of the donations that came in on march 27th? >> commissioner kopp: yes. yes. >> not in front muof

commissioner chiu. >> no. >> commissioner kopp? >> aye. >> commissioner lee. >> no. >> commissioner renne. >> no. >> commissioner ryan. >> no. >> the motion fails on a 4-1 vote. >> we have one final motion to adopt the ordinance as amended. and forward to the board of supervisors. >> i thought that first motion was adopted 4-1? >> it was, but there was also a subsequent amendment to change some language that commissioner kopp had raised. a tech dal clean up also subsequently adopted so this would now adopt the entirety of the ordinance as amended by those two. >> i will make a motion that we adopt the ordinance as amended by -- >> commissioner lee. >> i would like it to be recognized. >> commissioner kopp? >> thank you, i will vote no on this regressive ordinance. mr. marsdella who has more experience and time and effort than anybody on this podium on this subject described the present state of a proposed law which is regressive. it's regressive from what voters passed in 2000. i erroneously referred to that as pop significance j.

told the jury he never asked kopp to kill his parents. kopp made it all up.at really happened, he said, was that kopp stormed into the house that night to steal christopher's hidden stash, boxes full of drugs. >> how much marijuana did you store in these boxes? >> in the top box, about two pounds. >> what was the value of that? >> 7,000 bucks. >> in fact, the very day of the murder, kis said christopher, a hopped up kopp called him again and again desperate to buy drugs. christopher said between a birthday party and the movie, he couldn't do it. >> why did you tell him you couldn't get the drugs. >> objection. >> overruled. >> i told him i left it in my room in my parents' house. >> that's what gave kopp the reason where to go. >> that doesn't explain why he would in cold blood murder and attempt to murder. >> he went to get the drugs. he found the suttons home and they could recognize him. he panicked, he was in a drug stew poor a stupor and he shot them both. >> so if you were garrett kopp, wouldn't you try to implicate the man who turned you into police? h

>> commissioner kopp? >> commissioner kopp: through the chair, who are we kidding? this isn't going to be applicable to the june 5th election? the best chance we had is it might have been applicable to the november whatever it is election, but that's gone out the window because it isn't going to take effect until january 1, 2019. who are we kidding? there have been some common sensical comments made about scheduling the meeting, and madam chair woman, i would suggest that the executive director can inform us within the next 24 hours of what's available. commissioner renne won't be at the april 20th meeting, as he has stated, for good cause. that would mean no action until may. let's get an alternative date before april 20th, madam chair woman, and meet then. and at that time, we will be fully informed with as to what the heck was happened here, and why all of a sudden, it's hurry up and vote this out of these chambers. >> president breed >> thank you, commissioner kopp. i would like to say on behalf of myself, we absolutely are wanting to collaborate and work togeth

chair to commissioner kopp? >> the supervisor appears to ask me to just vote irrespective of my beliefs. that is a serious expectation, which unfortunately through the chair, supervisor peskin, i cannot honor. >> okay. oh, supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: one last statement, madam president, and to my colleagues on the board of supervisors and to the four members of the ethics commission. this was setup by whatever genius who's sitting here in the audience as an iterative process. as it should be, this requires a super majority vote, four out of five members of an ethics commission, one of whom is appointed by the board of supervisors, one by the city attorney, one by our assessor, one by our district attorney, one by -- who are you appointed by, yvonne? the mayor? there you go. so this is a multiheaded hiatra. it requires eight out 11 members of the board of supervisors. it requires an iterative process. and of course i am not asking you to abandon your principles, judge kopp, but i am allowing you to a

commissioner kopp? >> commissioner kopp: aye. >> so just to be clear, it would be taking your motion. >> commissioner kopp: aye. >> so by wednesday, april 25th around noon. >> somewhere around this world, noon is close of business. how is that? >> all in favor of granting the petitioner's request and incorporating the -- incorporating the contributions from march 27th, directing the commission staff to make the final determination within five business days and making that final binding and nonappealable. am i missing anything else? >> also in terms of the staff determination which would be made on may 2nd, a determination would also be made by noon. >> yes, by noon. all in favor? okay. all right. >> there's additional public comment. >> calling agenda item number four, public comment. is there any public comment? none? okay. move to adjourn then. we're adjourned. transportation authority meeting for today, tuesday, april 24, our clerk, if you could please call the roll. roll call, commissioner breed abs

koppe koppe [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2018] >> one day after announcing his retirement, house speaker paul ryan held a news conference on the congressional legislative agenda and the remainder of his term in congress. the speaker reiterated he will remain in the top leadership st until next year, january, 2019. and he commented about potential military action in syria. speaker ryan: you know, right now we are in one of the best economic environments in years. businesses are looking to hire. in fact, there are now 6.3 million job openings across the country. that's a record. the jobs are there for the taking but the challenge is, we need more workers. we have to make sure that it's easier to prepare for work and to get the right skills. and we have to make sure that it pays to work to have the right incentives. this is what our work force development agenda is all about. last year the house passed a measure which improves car

of the ethics commission just reminded me that back in 1977, board of supervisors president clinton kopp proposed to change the way that we've been doing approvals, zoning in the city because he said the process is arbitrary and capricious decision-making that comes awfully close to taking property without due process. and he said he was particularly concerned by the lack of middle-income housing stock in san francisco and the difficulty young people with children encounter in finding a place to live. that was back in 1977. and the way we've been doing it in the 40 years since then has made things worse. the planning commission still does arbitrary and capricious decisions. the people adapt by overcrowding, tent cities. i argue that the way we've been doing local control in san francisco has led to very unethical outcomes. thank you. >> president breed: thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, everyone. my name is wendy wong. i am the member of the san francisco coalition of good neighborhoods. we value quality of life. i'm here to speak to three items, at le

commissioner kopps. commissionern

i wish they'd taken him up on that in any case judge kopp found against life and for abortion as did the other two circuits and we had now lost two or three circuits in the previous legislation, we lost before the supreme court, there's a ban on partial birth abortion had been struck down. and we have lost in three circuits when we came back with the better language and the find, the congressional findings that it's never necessary to do a partial birth abortion to save the life of the mother. we lost in all these areas. so that's two or three circuit the first time around and a supreme court the first time around and three circuits the second time around. on our way to the supreme court. now, who would think that we'd be successful before the supreme court the second time through with carhart vs. gonzalez? i would say looking back on history, we should have been able to expect that. i don't know what i expected. i just knew what i many -- what my job was was to do all i could do to save the lives of the most innocent among us. so the supreme court found in favor of life and against