just, well, one day he left at dusk, it wasn’t kubrakov after all, there is no kubrakov, this is theit's all very sad, mr. oleksiy, but these reforms, about which there is already so much talk about the government reform, that there is some center... decision-making, or not i know what it will be called there, the control center, i understand that it will be the same the minister of the cabinet of ministers to lead, tsup, well, what is this, what is this, well, explain to me, i have been observing ukrainian politics for 30 years, i have seen, of course, this separation of ministries, then mergers, then independent secretaries of state, then something else, well, that is, i a million variations saw what was happening. there is not enough , look, the problem of the government is that it is not there to understand, but what will this center do? well, it sounds like a complete absurdity, does not make any decisions, all decisions are made at the bank, which can be called though its decision-making center, flight control center, decision control center, well, call it tsup, call it cia, ca

just, well, once it was dusk, there was no kubrakov, there is no kubrakov, he is the vice prime ministers is very important, mr. oleksiy, but these reforms, about which there is already so much talk about the government reform, which there is some decision-making center, i don’t know what it will be called, the control center, i understand that it will be the same minister of the cabinet of ministers to manage, soup, well , what is it, what is it, well, explain to me, i 30 years of observation. in ukrainian politics, i saw, of course, the separation of ministries, then mergers, then independent state secretaries, then something else, well, that is, i saw a million variations of what happens in the government, and now even my fantasies, my knowledge is not enough to to understand, and what is this one the center will deal with, well, this sounds like complete absurdity, look, the problem of the government is that it does not make any decisions, all decisions are made at the banks, which can be called at least its center for... decisions, flight control center, decision control center , we

kubrakov's formal reason was the division of the ministry he headed. informal reason is the deterioration of kubrakov's relations with the bank, directly with the president. can you tell in more detail why kubrakov was actually fired, what he did not like? well, look, it seems to me that the main problem here is to recognize the limits of what we can know and understand, that these are actually complex, behind the scenes games and that's normal for the country. which is in a state of war, and i would not really comment on why he did not please the president, we already have the fact, the minister, the vice-prime minister kubrakov has been dismissed, and a person will be proposed who will occupy one of the two positions now, everyone it seems to me that we, as experts and civil society, should talk about three key things: political culture, i about how it happened, about institutions. how these associations, separation of ministries, which are made for a specific person, and how they destroy the very institutional, the capacity of the state, and the thi

kubrakov is completely different, because mr. solskyi submitted a statement about his resignation, and the council voted precisely on this statement. as for mr. kubrakov, yesterday in an emergency mode , votes for the resolution were collected from people's deputies and signatures from people's deputies in order to bring it to the hall, that is, mr. i went alone, sir kubrakov was dismissed by the council. ms. kiro, look, there were rumors about the possible removal from office of the prime minister, mr. shmyhal, but somehow it seems that this wave of his information personnel has passed, are there still questions about shmyhal, well, maybe there are information of some unofficial plan, you know, mr. antin, we see that mr. shmyhal, he is an extremely convenient prime minister for the existing... this mechanism and model of power that currently exists in our country, he does not have active publicity, works together with the office of the president, is good the executor of all tasks, no, let's put it this way, he does not protest a

just, well, one day it was dusk, everything was not there was kubrakov, there is no kubrakov, this isster, it's all very sad, mr. oleksiy, but these reforms, about which so much has already been said... about the government reform, that there is some decision-making center, or i i don't know what it will be called there, the control center, i understand that it will be the same minister to manage the cabinet of ministers, and what is that, well, explain to me, i have been observing ukrainian politics for 30 years, i have seen, of course , this separation of ministries, then mergers, then state secretaries. dependent, then something else, well, that is, i have seen a million variations of what is happening in the government, and now even my fantasies, my knowledge is not enough to understand, and what will this center do? well, it sounds like a complete absurdity, look, the problem with the government is that it does not make any decisions, all decisions are made by banks, which can be called though his decision-making center, flight control center, decision-making center, well, call i

but let's go back to kubrakov, and why was he removed?'s remember who kubrakov was before the war, before he? kubrakov was one of the main actors of the big construction, which was popularly called the big theft. and before his eyes, five monopolists, who between themselves squabbled over this colossal budget of tens of billions of dollars, were engaged in this, a 10% kickback for the authorities, how much they took offshore, i can't tell you, and kubarko was the best, he was praised by the president, he was praised prime minister. everything was fine, but as soon as the war began, kubrakov really stopped this whole story, moreover, he established personal relations with the american embassy and representatives of our main strategic ally, and from that moment on, when this scheme of dereyban ended, from that moment he suddenly became unloved, because 10% stopped dripping, and then he became the enemy of those who decided not to leave... this place, and this place is so sweet in their vision, not because it is necessary to help the zsu, an

such a mini soap opera unfold before our very eyes, literally at the end of last week oleksandr kubrakovsmissed from the post of deputy prime minister for the reconstruction of ukraine, minister of community development, territories and infrastructure, oleksandr kubrakov is a person who was one of the closest associates of volodymyr zelensky when the big construction began, and here he is. .. were fired, and it was suddenly not only for you and me, friends, but also for kubrakov himself, because kubrakov himself, who was summoned to a meeting of a committee, a specialized committee, in order to explain certain issues regarding his activities, he said that i will not come there, i did not have a conversation with the president, i did not have a conversation with the prime minister, what kubrakov wrote about his position on social networks. he writes that the resignation came as a surprise to him, but he was ready to report, i quote: i am always ready for an open dialogue and a detailed report on the work of the ministry in all areas under my responsibility, the leadership of the faction a

in december 2022 , kubrakov was promoted to deputy prime minister. his sphere is responsible. the urban planning law, in which they saw serious corruption risks, but the reason for his resignation was probably not that, as the media, in particular, the publication of nv, wrote, kubrakov lost the trust of the bank, where in fact the decision to dismiss the vice-prime minister was made, they say, he failed the direction. rakova became a serious personnel victory the head of zelenskyi's office, says the editor-in-chief of centornet yury butusov. zelensky's dependence on yarmak has already taken the form of a psychological illness. the president literally fulfills all the whims of his almighty head of office and gets rid of everyone who has independent access to the president to bypass the fair. after kubrakov's removal, yarmak will start intrigues to remove fedorov from the post of deputy prime minister. and head of the sbu malyuk. how true is such a categorical statement? andriy yermak, a personal friend of the president, met him 10 years before zelens

kubrakov resigned.he question is that no one explains anything, no one understands anything that happened. but i think that the answers to these questions, why kubrako left, will be when we will receive a new minister, and it will be a minister instead of kubrakov or a vice prime minister who will lead the restoration of ukraine, well , obviously the answer will lie in the appointment that we will expect, and we must also remind that we are all waiting for a new government reform, it has already been announced. representatives of the servants of the people faction, they say that they decided to divide the ministry of community development, territories and infrastructure into two separate departments, before that they lumped these two departments together, now they are separating, well, in a word, which it will be the ministries, what will be the management structure, i think it will become known literally very soon, another event, friends, which was quite actively commented on and well... at least in so

in december 2022 , kubrakov was promoted to deputy prime minister. scope of his responsibility has significantly expanded. infrastructure, reconstruction of ukraine, regional policy and housing and communal services. kubrakov's critics accused him of the scandalous urban planning law, which they saw as serious corruption risks, but this was probably not the reason for his resignation, as the media reported. in particular , kubrakov lost trust in nvua bank, where in fact the decision to dismiss the vice-prime minister was made. like, he failed the direction of regional policy and communicated too actively with western embassies, in particular the us ambassador. apparently, andriy yermak didn't like it very much. kubrakov's removal was a serious personnel victory for the head of zelenskyi's office, he claims. zelensky's dependence on yarmak has already taken the form of a psychological illness. the president fulfills literally all the whims of his almighty head of office and gets rid of everyone who has independent access to the president bypassing yar

kubrakov was fired because they wanted to fire him. to be honest, a very incomprehensible creative for me, which looks nothing like, well, strange movements and a heroic solution to a problem that was just as heroically created literally a year ago, so i'm sorry if we have problems from regionals. politics, then literally two days later i saw on the internet a photo of the forum regional, and there they directly announced some successes at the level of top officials of the country, who recently also talked about problems in regional politics, but once again i am more than convinced that mr. kubrakova was fired because there was such a political will, not because equal factions, i do not want to offend the servant of the people faction here, but i would like to remind you that even... with maryana bezvukla, they could not dismiss the deputy from the post of a position that no one needed, by the way, the deputy head of the profile committee, so let's believe in the amnesty about that , which is sharply for day they were able to convince

in this situation, kubrakov comes, they say to him, listen, we will remove you, shmyhal did not talkm spoke, he did not come to the committee, he was left there, some german delegation went to meet him, reached halfway to kyiv, they they say, but kubrakov is no one anymore, that is, turn back, what is it at all? was rejected, because i still can't understand and there are no clear explanations, and why he was fired, he was engaged in the wrong thing, or the wrong way, or with the wrong things, or both with those and with those, well, first of all, i don't agree that the ministry, which consists of regional development, that is, community development support, and the former autodor, whatever they call him now, should be responsible for the war, well that... the owl on the globe is not stretching, i think that we would have such a person it is obvious to be the prime minister, but the prime minister is not capable of performing this function, he is, he is not the prime minister, he is yermak's stooge in the prime minister's office, and pinchuk, for that matter so to take akhmetov or wh

, and why his removed, let's remember who doryna kubrakov was.

, oleg mykhailovych, well , kubrakov worked for himself, did he enter?he president's team, worked, worked, worked, something happened here that we don't know about, well, marta and i at least don't know, and this is where the story about kubrakov's resignation began, that is, with solsky, yes, well, taking into account those criminal cases initiated on charges of embezzlement, it is clear, so to speak, but what about kubrakov, as what rumors are circulating in the parliament, by the way, with sosky, this is quite strange. yesterday there was a story, on the one hand, his servants greeted him with applause, and during the speech, a representative of the servant of the people faction sang in honor of the minister of agriculture, and then they all unanimously voted for his resignation and we said to the representatives of the authorities: friends, you or do not applaud standing, or if you applaud standing, then do not vote for resignation, and it somehow turns out so incomprehensible, on the one hand... they sing deferambas and standing applaud, and with on

kubrakov. am always ready for an open dialogue and a detailed report on the work of the ministry in all areas under my responsibility. the leadership of the faction , the head of the government, denys shmyhal, did not discuss this decision with me. at the faction meeting and the specialized committee was not invited. the day before, the servants of the people faction talked about the need to divide the ministry of community development, territories and infrastructure into two separate departments. but the most interesting thing. that it was the representatives of the servants of the people who molded this great ministry, now they say, listen, there is no kubrakov, we do not need such a great ministry, but observing this, kateryna, what conclusion do you come to , that in principle there is a single center decision-making, sometimes those who believe that they also enter this decision-making center and find themselves outside this center, well, that is, these five or six men... about whom zelens

yevgenia, you know exactly why kubrakov was dismissed, you voted for oleksandr's resignation, i did, voted for his resignation, and when i voted, i rather supported the decision to split the ministries, to have a separate ministry of regional policy, by the way, i absolutely agree with my colleague kocherenko that housing and utilities has lost somewhere. and it should be, because the problems will only grow and the issue of preparing for winter, that too, including housing and communal services, which we need right now to reconfigure, as to why this happened so quickly, well, such is the political process, and this was also part of the political process, but i am very much looking forward to the information about the division of the ministry, i understand that they are looking for and... . legal entities and also, well, i agree that there were mistakes in this unification, unification, the specialized ministry of our humanitarian policy committee also went through some processes of unification, then unification, i know how it affects, let's say , on the working capacity of the legal

the verkhovna rada of ukraine dismissed oleksandr kubrakov from the post of deputy prime minister for the reconstruction of ukraine. 272 people's deputies voted for this decision. kubrakov was not at the meeting was present at his page on facebook noted that prime minister denys shmyhal did not discuss the decision to dismiss with him. he was allegedly not invited to the meetings of the servants of the people faction and the specialized committee. let me remind you that the government plans to create a separate ministry that will deal with regional policy. the parliament is also currently considering the dismissal of minister of agrarian policy mykola solskyi. meanwhile, deputies. the minister of agrarian policy was arrested. such a decision was made during a meeting of the higher anti-corruption court. markiyan dmytrasevich will remain in custody until july 7, with the possibility of bail in the amount of more than uah 20 million. he is suspected of complicity in the illegal acquisition of land worth about uah 300 million. i will remind you earlier that the higher anti-corruption cou

yevgenia, you know exactly why kubrakov was dismissed, you voted for oleksandr’s resignation , well, voted, i rather supported it the decision to split the ministries so that there would be a separate ministry of regional policy, by the way, i absolutely agree with... my colleague kocherenko that housing and communal services is lost somewhere, and it should be, because the problems will only grow and the issue of preparing for winter is also the same, including and housing and communal services, which we need to reconfigure right now, about why this happened, it is fast, well, such is the political process, and it was part of the political process, but i am very much looking forward to the information. about separation ministries, i understand that they are looking for old legal entities, and also, well, i agree that there were mistakes in this unification, unification, the relevant ministry of our humanitarian policy committee also went through some processes of unification, then disunity union, i know how it affects, let's say, the working capacity of a legal entity, which is the

now they say, listen, kubrakov is gone, we don't need such a big ministry. so watch. or from this, kateryna, what conclusion do you come to that, in principle, there is a single decision-making center, sometimes those who believe that they too enter this decision-making center, find themselves outside this center, well, that is, these five or six managers, about whom zelensky once spoke at the final press conference in the 23rd year, it turns out that those who even think that they are included in these five or six... managers, like kubrako, for example, they are simply dismissed and not even warned or there is no prior conversation with the prime minister, how should this be perceived? well, this is perceived very badly. it looks very strange that the decision-making center is at the bank, well, we just hear about it from everywhere, somewhere from our own sources, somewhere from the sources of journalists who specialize in these topics there, sidelined from deputies, and you can hear it, well, it’s obvious, it’s already like a fact, but i just can’t unders

oleksiy goncharenko from european solidarity says that the story of kubrakov's dismissal and plans tostry shows the absence of a systematic personnel policy in the state, listen. what did honcharenko say? all this looks strange, the result is the same, there is no subjectivity either in the government or in the parliament, all decisions are made in the office the president, a team arrives, this team is quickly executed, there is no systematicity in this, it is a kind of kindergarten, the ministry was united, the ministry was united, just so you understand, it is not such a simple process, it involves millions of hryvnias, it takes months time this is the fate of hundreds of thousands of people, and this is lost time for work, and this is during the war, i am frightened by such personnel policy, its complete lack of systemic policy, such government policy is frightening, because the fact is that there is no government, that is, andrii, there is no government as such , there is a parliament, but it is in manual mode works, five or six managers manage the state, this is all during the wa

indeed, the question is correct, we did not receive a single answer, it was a meeting on friday, kubrakovsent, he... he did not give all the answers to all the questions, he did not give any adequate response, and in fact, billions of funds were spent and billions of funds are being spent on strengthening critical infrastructure facilities, but by and large this is not happening, there were also issues related to the spending of funds on substations, about which naim once told that by the end of winter will be after... everyone is fortified, and today they are under shelling by the rashists and, unfortunately, successful shelling by the rashists, and billions of hryvnias have been spent on this, and there is no answer as to where they went, there is a kind of nonsense beginning to tell people about the second, third level it doesn't matter, there is no light in kharkiv, there was no light in odesa, today we receive constant emergency flows from the european union, and this is all the area of ​​responsibility of kubrakov and nayem, directly, therefore... but i would like specific answers,

came under him , the ministries were glued together, now kubrakov is gone, that is, he is gone, thengain be divided into two, why two, why not seven, why not play chess? some kind of show here is even more interesting that a month before that both zelenskyi and shmygalal announced: we will knock down the ministry of water, we don't need the ministry of youth and sports, we will combine it with the ministry of culture or education changes, we will reduce the number of officials, why do we need two ministries and six provinces in each, if we now have one the minister and six orders and we are there minus seven top officials to cut. we are good guys, here, here hop, disconnect, stop, so when you were telling the truth, then a month ago or now there is a tip, and here we are, well, in a situation where we understand in the grand scheme of things that it was all- just an excuse to fire kubrakov, that the ministry will be separated, who will be the successor, and according to what principle the successor will be chosen for the castings, yes, for example, he will say, i will return personal

minus kubrakov?ister solsky, after that there is an intrigue, well, we need to somehow make informational white noise, which the two kubrakovs will come up with for us, because kubrakov was the first at the start to be the coolest manager on planet earth, at the finish line all telegrams covered him with mud channels affiliated with one of the streets in kyiv. and so they poured it hard enough, they don't regret it, they don't... regretting the bad paints, well, if you evaluate kubarkov objectively, then of course there are questions for him, for example, as far as i know, the construction, the construction of shelters in schools, is in part, at least his area of ​​responsibility, there we can, say, continue this rather serious series of what was done and not done, i remember the large-scale construction of 2022, well , at least he... dutifully followed the instructions, instead, i could take a clear political position, regarding the fact that such extravagance during the war is inadmissible, but it

not saying that it’s andriy yarmak or president zelenskyy, i’m not saying that at all, but yes, kubrakoved a rat, well, again after all, this is such a thief's jargon, a person who seems to steal from his own people was called someone else, someone else, and they spoke very negatively about him, but here is the question and then let's say that the former favorite minister of the president, and whose is he there was a beloved minister, he suddenly became an enemy, this is a smoke screen, could there really have been any differences, were we talking about some finances, some streams, about, well, because you don’t know, well, you think that he has to be honest, there is no corruption, no one steals money, still goes to the army, still goes to war, as they say, everything is for the front, everything is for victory, here it turns out that someone is ratting on someone, please explain, such telegram battles. well, look, i don’t know there to the office, not to the office, you know, we have telegram channels, when they are anonymous, you know, well, to be honest , i don’t think it’s necessary

well, solsky himself left, since he is still there, as i understand, because of a criminal case, kubrakovot known, by the way, because of what? left, yes, it’s still not clear, but in this case, well, and so on, well, no, i’m in general a supporter of the resignation of the cabinet, because i believe that the cabinet of ministers will not consult with the organization of the military economy in our country, because it is not ensuring adequate crediting of the military industry, unsecured insurance of the military industry so that the entrepreneurs where the missiles arrive can receive compensation, an unsecured long-term contract for troops their enterprises, what do they complain about, if you at least do not give them money for orders, then please at least let them export weapons so that they at least bring currency into the country and continue mass production, because the enterprises are just standing, because the cabinet of ministers i am not able to organize a permanent order for them, although it can be done, but i remember, you know, the 21st year, in my opinion, as it should have

oleksandr kubrakov was dismissed from the post of vice prime minister and minister of infrastructure. reform is planned in the office of the president? propaganda parade. putin used may's pobedobesiya rally to glorify russian aggression in ukraine and the west's nuclear threats. which of the foreign leaders came to moscow on the ninth? strengthening of failed mobilization. the verkhovna rada allowed the convicts to serve and increased the punishment for draft evasion, will the late decisions of the parliament correct the situation? glory to ukraine, this is the verdict program. my name is serhii rudenko, i greet everyone and wish everyone good health. during us. we talk for hours about ukraine, about the world, about the war and about our victory. on the day of victory, putin again threatened the world with nuclear weapons, ministers kubrakov and solsky are retired, and the mobilization of prisoners, how it will take place in ukraine and who will fall under this mobilization, we will talk about this and other things over the next hour with by our guests, two people's deputies of ukrai

of the servants of the people who molded this great ministry, now they say, listen, there is no kubrakov, we don’t need such a great ministry, watching it, kateryna. what conclusion do you come to what is in principle some decision-making center, sometimes those who believe that they are also part of this decision-making center find themselves outside this center, that is, these five or six managers, about whom zelensky once spoke at the final press conference on 23 year, it turns out that those who even think that they are included in these five or six managers, well, like kubrako, for example, they are simply... dismissed and not even warned if there is no prior conversation with the prime minister minister, how to perceive it? well, this is perceived very badly, it is very strange it seems that the center of decision-making is at the bank, well, we hear about it from everywhere, somewhere from our own sources, somewhere from the sources of journalists who specialize in these topics there, behind the scenes from deputies and you can hear, well, it is visible, it it's like a fact. but i

kubrakov was not present at the meeting. on his facebook page , he noted that the head of

on april 25, he wrote a resignation letter, and oleksandr kubrakov also resigned from his post.s the minister of reconstruction of ukraine, minister of development of communities, territories and. infrastructure, 272 people's deputies, the government official himself voted for this decision there was no meeting hall, and here it is important to note that now in the service of the people they are talking and discussing a possible option regarding the division of infrastructure mines in half, i.e. once there were two separate ministries, they were connected, and now they have decided again that these ministries should be separated to combine, and accordingly the question of who will head these ministries, will this mean... conditionally speaking, that kubrakov will become a minister of some divided ministry, that is, we do not know this at the moment, but we really hope that the deputies will clarify the light for us , yes, that is, what will they share from... this information, maybe they have more data about what kubrakov's fate might be after he was actually sent to this resign

, although he was not an obvious figure for me to be fired, and why was kubrakov fired in your opinion, maybe what, or who is behind this? you know, i don't even think about it for 30 seconds for one simple reason: the personality of the prime minister, vice prime minister, minister, head of the power bloc is important. when they have their own political, i would say figure, when there is, say, a coalition, when the ministers are by representatives of various coalition forces, when they enter the government in order to perform not just their official duties, but in order to represent certain positions of the parties they are nominated for. and then we will be able to talk a lot about it, yes, one party nominated such a group of ministers, and the other another, remember, in the coalition after 2014, we were surprised that the people's front proposed its own representatives for the positions of ministers , the bloc of petro poroshenko offered specialists in technocracy, they went the other way, and we did it long and hard discussed what different approaches to government formation are,

the verkhovna rada of ukraine dismissed oleksandr kubrakov from the post of deputy prime minister for the reconstruction of ukraine. 272 people's deputies voted for this decision. kubrakov was not present at the meeting, he noted on his facebook page that... the head of the government and the faction did not discuss the decision to resign with him. let me remind you that the government is currently planning to divide the mini-ministry into two separate structures, a namely the ministry of infrastructure and regional development. parliament raised fines for evaders. 256 people's representatives voted for this decision. according to the document, three regimes are being introduced: violation, repeated violation and... violation during martial law, in particular for failure to appear at the shopping center on a summons, evasion and late updating of data, initially a minimum fine of uah 17 will be imposed, later the fine will be increased. it can increase to uah 25.5. an interactive weapons museum was opened in ivano-frankivsk. the lion's share of the exhibition consists of digital animat

does not explain whether it is the president or the prime minister, and why, for example, oleksandr kubrakovas dismissed, they did not explain to politicians or society, they simply took and dismissed the vice-premier of the prime minister, the person who managed the infrastructure in ukraine, kamysh may become the new minister of infrastructure. and this is reported by novoye vremya with reference to sources in the government, the appointment will probably take place as early as next week. the publication also predicts two internal transformations government first, the ministry of strategy and industry will become part of the ministry of infrastructure. secondly, the functions of regional policy will be transferred to the ministry of economy. a relevant department is being created in yulia sverdenko's department. well, actually, it's larisa, it's all these events. and all these plans, they need one way or another some kind of explanation from the authorities, as in the last two years, especially as the authorities, in your opinion, have the authorities unlearned how to explain to society an

the verkhovna rada of ukraine dismissed oleksandr kubrakov from the post of deputy prime minister for the reconstruction of ukraine. 200. 72 people's deputies voted for this decision. kubrakov was not present at the meeting, he noted on his facebook page that the head of the government and the faction did not discuss the decision to resign with him. let me remind you, currently in the government. plan to divide the ministry into two separate structures, namely the ministry of infrastructure and regional development. a year and a half ago, when there was an alleged merger, in fact there was an absorption, 9-95% of specialists from the ministry of regions were dismissed, accordingly, the whole industry ruled us, european partners repeatedly told us about this, if we raise the reports of the european commission, their recommendations, in us nothing gets done, that's going to be a problem, so we decided we should split it back, we made a mistake, we 've admitted it, we're fixing it. run away from service and sang songs about evaders, a military serviceman from ivano-frankivsk, who boasted

has lost an influential position in the cabinet of ministers, as evidenced by the resignation of kubrakovand plans to dismember the president's office. restoration. glory to ukraine, this is the verdict program. my name is serhiy rudenko, i greet everyone and wish everyone good health. in the next two hours, we will talk about ukraine and the world and about our victory. the russians are storming the kharkiv region, the fortification of the front, for which oleksandr kubrakov was dismissed. we will talk about this and other things in the next section. hours with a politician, with our guest, former prosecutor general of ukraine yury lutsenko. however, before starting our long conversation with the former prosecutor general, i suggest watching a video of how ukrainian soldiers hit russian equipment in the avdiiv direction. the explosive video was shown in the 47th separate mechanized brigade, as it was, let's see. glory to the armed forces of ukraine and death to the russian occupiers. friends, we are working. live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platform

, because of the case, criminal case and criminal proceedings, oleksandr kubrakov is still not clear to the end, for what reason, his resignation was unexpected from the post of vice prime minister, and a person, who was very close to volodymyr zelenskyi, what is happening now in power, why is this happening, and the main thing. the annual issue is democracy and a strong leader elected by ukrainians, because four years ago, ukrainians and opinion polls testified that they... it is better to elect a strong leader, and democracy can be, let's say, somewhere on the sidelines, and now they are talking about the fact that, after all , democracy is the most important thing, what should be in ukraine, what is and what will be , because democracy ensures the development of ukrainian society. andrii dyanitskyi, kateryna nekrecha at 21:15, at 20:00, valery chaly, don't miss it, please. the evening will be interesting, so vasyl, you have a word. thank you, serhiy, so at 8 p.m. meet serhiy rudenko on the verdict program, and you have already waited for my colleague yevhena pastukhova, he came to

not explain whether there is a president or a prime minister, and for what, for example, oleksandr kubrakov was dismissed, they did not explain to politicians or society, they simply took and dismissed the deputy prime minister, the person who managed the infrastructure in ukraine, the new minister of infrastructure may become kamyshyn, and novoe vremya reports this with reference to sources in the government, probably. the appointment will take place next week, the publication also predicts two transformations within the government: firstly, the ministry of strategy and industry will become part of the ministry of infrastructure, secondly, the functions of regional policy will be transferred to the ministry of economy, and a corresponding department will be created in yulia sverdenko's department. well, actually, here is larisa, these are all these events and all these plans, they need one way or another some kind of explanation from the authorities. as in the last two years, especially as the government, in your opinion, has the government unlearned how to explain to society and journalis

rostislav, you are the very person to whom, in secret, yesterday, kubrakov reported, well, in particularabout various funds and programs, and you will share with us how the vice-prime minister and the minister gloriously ended their journey with a report on the completed, over-fulfilled obligations, i would have gladly shared, only he forgot to get to the council, as far as i understand, he was not exactly on the podium, so all of us and the whole hall and the whole country can only guess what kind of achievements these are, but the way he was escorted in quotes by all the telegram scum associated with the bank show that, well, the plot about spiders in the bank is a little like that, he is very in demand now, and it was just very strange, when, let's say, we know all the jokers and other stuff, and when they mixed it with shit, it was. wildly, because the very same telegram channels once explained that kubrakov was cooler, well, well, unless it was schwarzenegger, well, that’s why they talk about what you know, using the terms about ate, pushed out and so on, that's how you explain the

ministers kubrakov and solsky are retired, and the mobilization of prisoners. how it will take place in ukraine and who will fall under this mobilization. for the next hour, we will talk about this and other things with our guests, two people's deputies of ukraine, roman kostenko and... oleksiy honcharenko, as well as diplomat oleksandr khara. however, before starting our big conversation, i suggest you watch a video of how ukrainian defenders magically destroyed a russian t-90m breakthrough tank, fighters of the shadow unit, dropped an american m-67 grenade on it, destroyed enemy equipment in the area of ​​tonenko in donetsk region. let's see how it all happened. glory to the armed forces of ukraine and death. russian occupiers. friends, we work live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are now watching us live there. be please subscribe to our pages on facebook and youtube, and also take part in our survey. today we ask you about whether you support the decision to mobilize convicts into the armed forces

kubrakov, although he was an obscure figure for me to be released, why the release happened.your opinion, maybe what, or who is behind it? you know, i don't think about it at all, not even for 30 seconds. for one simple reason. what matters is the personality of the prime minister, vice prime minister, minister, head of the power bloc, when they have their own political, i would say, figure, when there is, say, a coalition, when the ministers... are representatives of various coalition forces, when they enter the government in order to perform not just their official duties, but to represent certain positions of the parties that nominate them, and then we will be able to talk a lot about it, so yes, one party nominated one group of ministers, and another another, you remember, in the coalition after 2014 we were surprised that the people's front proposed its own... representatives for the positions of ministers, petro poroshenko's bloc proposed specialists, technocracy, they went the other way, and we discussed it for a long time and lively, what are the different approaches

explanations to european partners regarding some actions and regarding, for example, the release of kubrakov to remind you of such a rather unfortunate episode, that on the day of his release just before the minister of economic development of germany came to hold negotiations on the organization. the summit on the reconstruction of ukraine in berlin on june 11-12, and while she was traveling for almost a day, getting to ukraine, by car and train, during this time the minister was fired and it was found that she had come to visit kyiv and had no one to meet with, and such moments should somehow be thought out in advance by the ukrainian authorities so that there would be no such incidents, and that is why predictability is needed, it is necessary to explain s... actions, and of course, it is necessary to fight against corruption, and one more topic, colleagues, this is the attempt on fico, the prime minister of slovakia was shot this week, the writer shot, and now, according to official sources in slovakia, he is in a rather serious condition, he had another operation , although... in princi

, maybe some of kubrakov's deputies, maybe it's just a kind of shadow, maybe some other department orr vice prime minister should still exercise control over how the state program is implemented and budget funds are used. the customer, the kharkiv regional military administration, is responsible, is responsible for who they chose as a supplier, who they chose as a supplier of materials. you said, i have to say it on the air, it's very important, again, we found information in open sources that the supplier of wood for the construction of fortifications, multi-million, multi-million agreements in... 366 million concluded agreements according to spending information, more than 36 million have already been paid, in particular to companies that have signs of fictitiousness , for example, where the owner of the firm is a person against whom there are cases in court, for example, if we are talking about to industry, then this is a person, ms. victoria, yes, who has cases in ... court regarding evasion of parental rights, recovery from a bank loan of 44,000, he committed domestic violence wh

, although he was for i am not an obvious figure for his release, but why did kubrakov's release happeninion, maybe what, or who is behind it, you know, i don't even think about it for 30 seconds for one simple reason, it matters personality of the prime minister, vice prime minister, the minister, the head of the power unit, when they have their own field. tic, i would say, a figure when there is, say, a coalition, when the ministers are representatives of various coalition forces, when they enter the government in order to perform not just their official duties, but to represent certain positions parties that are nominated.

, and essentially all of his team, they were trusted, because kubrakov was a guarantee that the economic would not be stolen, so that we build safeguards, how to reduce the risks of corruption during reconstruction. er, and there the team was very strong, er, they had good trusting relations both with the american partners and with the european partners, and the americans do not understand on what basis they were fired, that is , why, that is, what is the reason that they they didn't do it like that, well, here's the official reason, well, because there's a ministry that was united a year ago, now they have separated, here, but this is certainly not an argument, and in a democracy, a democratic country,... they don't do that, and considering that we are absolutely dependent on the financing of our foreign partners, a lot has been invested in us, and now the americans will be in first of all, to verify, but how does this investment justify itself, how is the country managed, who makes decisions at which levels, we talked about what... andriy yarmak, the head of president zelenskyi's offic

gala event minister of internal affairs of the republic of belarus, lieutenant general of police, kubrakov ivan. vladimirovich, chairman of the mogilev regional executive committee, anatoly mikhailovich isachenko, chairman of the standing committee on health, physical culture, family and youth policy, house of representatives of the national assembly of the republic of belarus, malashka valery anatolyevich, deputy chairman of the mogilev regional executive committee, oleg vladimirovich, chairman of the mogilev regional executive committee. of the executive committee oleg ivanovich chikida, deputy chairman the senate department of the belarusian orthodox church for interaction with the armed forces and law enforcement agencies of the republic of belarus, priests, heads of departments of the ministry of internal affairs, the main internal affairs directorate of the minsk city executive committee , the internal affairs directorate of the regional executive committees, educational institutions of the ministry of internal affairs, members of the belarusian. in the year marked by the eightieth a