on, or it is happening now, at least an appeal was planned for the decision of the kyiv district administrative courtand it is possible to put an end to this painful story with the election of the head of the sap, contact us mark savchuk, head of the council of public control nabu good evening . hello, actually, while it was on the air, i'm more precise on the air. i didn't find any news that today the court put an end to this issue or not enlighten me . since the meeting was held without the presence of the parties, a-a, therefore, that is, the courts themselves gathered and made some kind of decision. they could have loved it, a-a, they could have asked for additional documents, they could have simply postponed the meeting, which happens very often, they could have made a decision a- and both the decision that confirms the decision of the first instance and the decision that refutes the decision of the first instance that so far we do not know but i am sure that in the near future we will find out maybe tomorrow morning i think that tomorrow morning we will know uhu well, i'll just remind our viewe

will this decision on the appeal depend on, i’ll just remind you that you have it, the kyiv district administrative courtmous when it made its decision that undermines the competition, rather cancels the procedure of the competition commission, he justified the cancellation by a law that does not exist no i'm not kidding, you undermined the competition by justifying your decision with a legal norm that has been around for two years, which hasn't been there for 2 years. in the law itself, if you just understood the level of this court, yes, this is the court. it's not my fault, agia, but the secretary of the nsdc said how the one who was supposed to legalize yanukovych as president after the entry of russian troops into kyiv, the secretary of the national security council said this, this court undermined the competition for the national anti-corruption prosecutor, what is the sixth administrative court of appeal of the city of kyiv doing? the prosecutor, what kind of garden without the involvement of witnesses, without the involvement of the parties in written proceedings, well, the same trivial case, nob

one of these draft laws is the draft law 536 nine on the liquidation of the district administrative court of the city of kyivon of the kyiv city district administrative court is a presidential draft law ruslan stefanchuk chairman of the verkhovna rada at the end of the previous year said that the verkhovna rada would begin consideration of the presidential of the bill on the liquidation of the supreme council of justice and the high qualification commission of judges, well, the supreme court, as we can see, is still quite a convenient tool, let's say, a tool and even a platform for lobbying for some purely political interests, yes , that's exactly what we can see this is an example of the appointment of yuriy petrenko, the head of naftogaz, and he himself was appointed. go to court and say, like, who was he appointed illegally , and he was removed. the legislation and they went to court to untie the administrator and break the contract with kulenka - it's like something like that, linda, in general, it was supposed that the own anti -corruption system should be tried by the cabinet of ministers. the contract

of an urgent presidential bill that was being prepared for the liquidation of the district administrative court of kyiv, the very court that in people called him a crazy court printer and he is known for controversial decisions regarding the actions of public officials, in particular, one of the last such high-profile decisions of this court is that he took into consideration viktor yanukovych's lawsuit regarding the illegality of removing his powers as a fugitive ex-president in 2014 and literally in on the eve of the war, the administrative district court in kyiv was ready to consider this issue; in the end , the parliament waited until june, during the war, and the head of this court and part the judges received suspicions, and after that, the special anti-corruption prosecutor's office already had time to send a constructive verdict to the court regarding betrayal and participation in a criminal organization. this is also an incomplete list of those accusations that will be considered against the judges already in court, that's why. that 's what andria is for kosin was criticized, however, again in

the prosecutor's office and the prosecutor general's office on the decision of the district administrative court of kyiv regarding the cancellation of the order of work of this commission informed ukrinform about this in the court itself when i was the judge in this case under the chairmanship of ihor fedo- on may 18, fedotova assigned this case to a written proceeding, that is, the judges will make a decision without a court hearing. they have two months from the moment of the opening of the implementation. half a year ago and now, all ukrainian international partners directly depend on the further provision of international financial and military aid to ukraine on reforms in ukraine, in particular regarding the appointment the head of sap and we will now talk with oleksandr sayenko, candidate of legal sciences, honored lawyer, lawyer, minister of the cabinet of ministers , 16-19 years old, is oleksandr sayenko in touch, no, not yet, unfortunately, i would like to add that uh, today is on the air of the espresso tv channel, yes vitaliy shabunin himself was there, who noted that there is a question of s

eve of the sixth administrative appeals court will restore the powers of the competition commission whose work was previously blocked by the district administrative court of the city of kyivod, the epic is still going on. with the appointment of a new head of sap, it is not the first year that our journalists remind us of the story of the issue, let's watch a short story together and discuss the story with the appointment of the head of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office has been going on for almost two years, individual members of the commission, which is supposed to hold the competition, have been sabotaging its work for months by not appearing at the meeting. in the end, according to the results of the competition, the detective of the anti-corruption bureau oleksandr klymenko scored the highest number of points, but part of the commission stubbornly refuses to recognize his victory, except that there was a decision of the district administrative court of kyiv, which is headed by the odious pavlo vovk , about the cancellation of the order of the commission's work, it generally called into question the entire contest russia us every year, the same place

receive an appointed permanent head of the garden, so when we talk about the district administrative court of the city of kyivnd hope not get your n-pig for the country well, it seems to me that optimism is simply sky-high in view of the experience of this court, which, by the way, should have been liquidated a long time ago, ms. tetyana, i do not understand the position of the sixth court of appeals, she should announce their decision on the appeal to the decision of the district administrative court by the 18th, the 19th, what about that ? first of all, it is necessary to look at the most convincing. and it could be because the luaz court refers to a non-existent norm of the law, and this is absolutely a decision, it was not valid, and therefore expectations from the side commissions for the court's decision or settlement of this decision were absurd, the year the decision did not have legal force and the commission could work as it shows, as today's practice shows, but now they have started a meeting , uh, a meeting can be convened if you really want to, ah, the sixth court of appeals, in my opinion, simpl

to consider a draft law on the liquidation of the scandalous, simply hostile district administrative court of the city of kyiv register of court decisions, its decision to return jan nothing to the post of president of ukraine on february 16 of this year, and it was literally stopped in the last few centimeters, that is, the ukrainian court and this person who well, he has such a complex list, now we have a prosecutor general, but let 's talk more about the appointment of a constitutional constitutional judge today, because this is also an important topic, if we can, but let us, leonita , react, we will listen to mr. mykhailo zhirnakov, then we will release mr. zhernakov and join the on our broadcast after that oleksandr kachura, people's deputy of ukraine and deputy chairman of the committee on the organization of state power, so mr. mykhailo, express your opinion in full. no one has ever entered such a place. it’s just that if we had such a plan that we first listen to experts and then move the politicians, and actually they are trying to somehow explain today’s events in parliament because they were their

election of the sap leadership and the prosecutor general's office to the decision of the district administrative court of kyiver of this and we expect a wise, balanced and above all honest and transparent decision of the sixth court of appeal, the commission should work the results of the competition are obvious and it is necessary to finally wrap up this story with the sap prosecutor and move further in the direction of the european future, and at this point we will pass the floor to the news, our colleague iryna koval is already ready to present her live broadcast from the editorial office of espresso and iryna, thank you colleagues literally in a moment i will tell about the most important events at this time in the news program 15 in ukraine and chas novin on the espresso tv channel greetings in the studio of iryna koval vinnytsia in mourning, the city is recovering from russian terror from the rocket attack on in the center of the city, 23 people were killed, including three children, the bodies of 11 adults have not yet been identified, 180 three victims, 82 of them were hospitalized, among the wounded,

on the agenda the urgent presidential draft law on the liquidation of oask is the district administrative court of kyiv, which promised to liquidate the bank because of corruption in it. well, i will also remind you that andriy kostin wanted to be the head of sap but did not pass the integrity check, and also. it is known that in 2019 he sold two apartments in odesa, but in he did not indicate this in the declaration, and in 2020 he became one of the 19 people who rented housing at budget expense, but at the same time did not declare their place of residence in kyiv, and finally, in political circles, kostin is called a person close to the leader office of president andriy yarmak, well, at least it was andriy yarmak who recommended bones to the list of the party servant of the people in whose ranks kostyan got to the parliament, the appointment of andriy kostin, i hope we will now discuss from minute to minute, we are waiting for a guest on this on this topic well, in the meantime, i offer you watch e-e report about how luhansk university of internal affairs survived the fourth resettlement for d- duri

of the head of the e-e sap e-e mm and the office of the general prosecutor at the district administrative court of kyiv regarding the cancellation of the order of work of this commission which completed the work that on december 21 last year, in principle, the winner is aware, the points have been calculated, but the decision has not been made public, that is, it has been made public, but the winner has not been announced. do you think that this story will be put to an end on monday, and whether oleksandr klymenko will be officially announced as the winner of the contest for the head of the department? i definitely understand the issue of anti-corruption reform, since i have been engaged in anti-corruption reform for 8 years , and now i actually focused on what i consider the most priority. at this stage for ukraine, the most the priority is to stop and expel the aggression from the territory of the aggressor from the territory of ukraine and to restore justice for all those who became its victims, however, of course, the appointment of the sap prosecutor is one of the demands that were put forward to

appeal can submit the case there , whether the case is being considered legally, the district administrative court of kyiv canceled the order the holding of the competition, klymenko himself refused to comment on the epic about his appointment. but his former competitor and now the future deputy andriy sinyuk says he is ready to start work as soon as he is appointed, you need to get up and work . for the winners of the competition to start working in their positions as soon as possible iryna sayevich ivan gorbunov the only news on the public verkhovna rada dismissed the head of the sbu ivan bakanov and the prosecutor general, irina venediktova, removed them from their positions the day before by his decree of the president, as volodymyr zelenskyi said, the reason for this was 6 hundred criminal proceedings against collaborators and state traitors among the security forces, one opinion of the head of the anti-corruption center, vitaliy shabunina, the resignation of officials in this way is an attempt the head of state monopolizes the law enforcement system , iryna venediktova herself believes that the head

the head of the sap and the prosecutor general's office against the decision of the district administrative court of kyivding the financing of the procedure of the commission of the meeting of the head of the sap provision of financial military aid to ukraine by our partner countries. to be efficient and high-quality to respond to the european but the council can be guided by calls from the president's office, which is hard to imagine in europe, so it is not only in the law, but the anti-corruption laws are normal, but the authorities have not been able to appoint an anti-corruption prosecutor for almost two years, and rather they don't want to, and they don't want to because of that who doesn't want it to work now and it doesn't work because there is no anti-corruption prosecutor uh, that's why the measure in this case requires the illegal appointment of the person who was elected as an anti-corruption prosecutor, well that's i don't know whether it is or not, we will see, but our relations with the west will definitely depend on this, we understand very well that he judged us too, unfortunately , they

on the conversation with our previous guests, i again draw attention to the district administrative court of the city of kyivthe bill regarding its liquidation is included in the overall concept of judicial reform in our country, and this bill is already in place, stefanchuk promised that at the end of that year, and that it will soon be considered. but nevertheless , we understand that there and the war adjusted the plans, maybe there are other reasons and so far well, i did not understand the stage of consideration of this issue in general ms. oksano, there are things that can be resolved on the floor of the parliament right now. is this work being carried out and is it intensive enough in your opinion ? in fact, we are voting on many laws in the parliament today. this is very important, although here, when these bills reach the session hall i understand that there are still a lot of contradictions. i believe that today, more than ever, there is an opportunity to vote on all those bills that we may not have had time to do before the war regarding the district court - this is true, even with my colleagues s

, we recently spoke on the air and announced the meeting of the court of the district administrative court of the city of kyivit is about recognition the illegal procedure for holding a competition for the head of sap and today, july 12, it was supposed to take place - this appeal should have taken place, this consideration by the appeals court of the decision of the general administrative court, there is already some understanding of what was decided or not decided there. and on at the moment it is not yet known. and you must understand that the meeting was held without the presence of the parties, that is, the court, so to speak , gathered itself. while we don't know, i could just postpone the meeting, i could make a decision, but not yet . ah ah they constantly drip on our heads with the fact that we need to appoint the chief prosecutor of sap, and the judges will simply be afraid, but they understand that there is a large amount of attention to these now, and that's why they will probably try to transfer them somewhere to august, when all they leave when western bureaucrats and officials go on vacation, a

seven months, the main thing here is to understand that the decision of the a-a district administrative court of the city of kyivwhich is quite odious and the decision is quite dubious, still did not in any way limit the commission in gathering and announcing the winner cont yes, which is a purely technical decision, they give themselves such a refusal that no, let's wait until there is an appeal, an appeal, it seems, the decision should be today. and the fact that the verkhovna rada, the general prosecutor's office announces on the website when the meeting is normal practice, and by the way, in this regard, the process of transparency of the competition itself, there were moments that we were not satisfied with, but the final result was transparent, uh, everyone saw everything, how they behaved, who answered and who asked, so it has been 7 months, how could it be appoint to recognize the winner of the contest mr. klymenko and i think during this time it would be enough for the prosecutor general to appoint this person and remove this issue forever and not to give an excuse on the eve of the conditional receipt