you can see fort laramie there. this point of the map is nebraska territory, eventually wyoming territory, right? this is the first of two big treaties that are going to be signed at fort laramie. and what the 1851 fort laramie treaty is supposed to do, supposed to do, is recognize native american claims, land claims, in the region, right? while at the same point in exchange for that recognition and annuities, annual payments of certain amounts of cash to native americans, specifically we're talking about the lakota, the cheyenne, the arikara, the arapaho, the mandan, a couple of others i'm forgetting off the top of my head. the crow, the blackfeet as well i? don't know. anyway, recognizing the territory in exchange for, kind of, allowing safe passage for these settlers with the idea that they weren't going to stop, right? you can pass through our territory to the willamette valley. that's perfectly fine with us, in exchange for you not staying, you recognizing our land claim, and a little bit of money, that would b

it's worth noting that in the fort laramie treaty. there was also calls for kind of on these reservations for there to be a movement towards farming. how serious that was it's still a good open question, but that becomes kind of key component, right? since the 1840s the way the united states has really kind of. sought to occupy its territorial lands has been through this notion of homesteading. and it's important to realize when we talk about homesteading it's based in a really important idea. that unowned resources. can be claimed. by individuals who will then use those resources and more largely talking about land here, but again notice it's unowned resources. so whether we're talking about the settlement in kansas right kind of that home setting process or the 1862 homestead law that gets passed by the united states government it is this idea. there's this unused unused resource that this land. is not being used or at the very least not being used appropriately. right. so this gets back to what turner was talking about in this kind

as he mentioned, laramie put in has said that he is prepared to use any weapon in russia's arsenal to defend russian territory. and now that he has annexed her son and several other regions, he considers those to be russian territory. on the other hand, u. s. intelligent services say that they do not see evidence that rushes nuclear pasture has changed. so what are you expecting to the extent that you can assess while i 2nd us assessment, we are very closely watched the preparation of the noun. huge exercise has been very closely watched a test of a nuclear drone. russia has tested in the previous month, and we could very well trace the movements of physical materials or react, of course, cetera. so we know when russia move something, and if russia move something we can pick up, all the americans can pick up the red telephone and make a call. ah, but are russia will make nuclear noise? and it does, sir, because he knows that this is your only convincing argument they can make to deter the west from supporting ukraine. and unfortunately, we are providing them with evidence that this ar

other members in laramie, a large group of nato. how big as be guessed, turkey by territory, and the 10 lesser cap having a t think next to them. so use and finance have limited couple teasing in. therefore day conservation to oral alliance. territory integrity will be limited, but alas, in return we'll have to provide them additional defense. it's barely more than an hour drive from the finish border to russia. second city st. petersburg. it's just 140 kilometers. a thank that appears to be regarded as especially promising across the ocean in the pentagon. of course, on the top of that there's that russian position which space that the if those nordic states, hello, that t nato, assault veterans, or other venice rating robins to rush into to study, to be deployed in sweden or film. and then it will have to be a problem between russia and them. it will turn to be a problem with russia and nato. so you're from a solution. stone of hooked up the beat up will you boy still discussed with proper would merge them longer. wish to separate

constantly talking about going after bullet laramie's, where all the arrests that he demanded publicly justice department go easy on his friend. time with the article it's out now. he is accusing -- by locking up the political opponents. who's gonna lock up? , your political opponents that i can tell would be locked up by then biden administration on their part except for those that stormed capitol. whether pence is the former president is saying is that those who stormed the capitol are getting improperly locked up by the current administration. that is a rather -- defensive insurrectionists. the point? i think you're right. and this will help him politically, as a calling card to his own bad base to say, see, they're coming after me because they are coming after you. we are in this together and whatever they get is the least mainstream media, justice department, it -- it's a politics of grievance, and resentment, and he's going to see if he can duplicate that for the general elections. >> for your first point, talk, about the document how he tried to weaponize the chances department.