lashkar was assisted from the start by the pakistani military.as waned, there is little evidence that pakistan's generals are making any serious effort to shut down what has become a vast organization within their country. lashkar's stated goals go beyond kashmir to the imposition of islamic rule in all of south asia. it pamphlets are filled with attacks on hindus and jews. like al qaeda which began with limited goals and some state support, it could be morphing into something larger and much more sinister. but terrorism is waged by individuals. we saw these young peasant boys who had little education and no prospects in their country. they are the ones who enlist for the jihad. so we have political and ideological forces on one hand and the simple despair of young men on the other. the two have combined to create a deadly mix. the only way this movie will end well is if we tackle both sides of this problem. we need to get the military and foreign policy right. but we also need to help change the sense of hopelessness and the culture of hate that

it is not lashkar-e-taiba, it is an offshoot of it. there could be threats of the indian mujahedin or a local criminal gang. this has happened before. a lashkar operator, if you look at it david coleman headley -- surveillance of the mumbai targets in 2007. is he a lone wolf terrorist? or is he sent there by lashkar- e-taiba to act as a lone wolf to make people believe that there is an individual acting on his own. there is a case of the man involved in the plot to survey the financial institutions in new york and new jersey and washington. and then there is the need, the requirement on the part of the lone wolf to communicate with members of the organization. this way the terrorist organizations can engage in plausible deniability. it is the individual. you this was an individual and we are not involved. what these lone wolf attacks as far as terrorist organizations go, they show would be lone wolves, here is one guy, all of you can do the same thing. that is what i'll unlock you have been saying, thou what year he has been saying thi

initially, the news reports said there was one jab and then we discovered lashkar-e-taiba was tryingengage will be called plausible deniability. and then, there could be threat of the indian majority or a local criminal game in indiana. this has happened before because if you look at the surveillance of the mumbai targets in 2007, is he a global terrorist or is he kind of, kind of fanfare by lashkar-e-taiba to make me believe this is an individual who is perpetrating acts and so on? there is the case of beirut, was involved in a plot to survey the financial institutions in new york and is thursday in washington. and then, there is this man to obviate the requirement on the part of the love will tear us to communicate with other members of the group. in this way, terrorist organizations can engage in plausible deniability. it is the individual. i told you we aren't involved. what he's lone wolf attacks, as far as terrorist organizations go, the word he terrorists or would he fumbles, all of you can go and do the same thing. that's what al-awlaki has been saying. that's at 73 is saying

was demanding like crack down on the haqqani network and the lashkar-e-taiba. at the end of his tenure in september 2011, pakistan had not changed. it was still supporting these groups and they think what really angered him and made him say the statements in congressional testimony the end of september 2011 when he said basic to the haqqani network is arming the isi -- >> guest: the viewer should know that the haqqani network is nothing to do with me. it's just a coincidence of names. >> host: we are talking about the haqqani who is in afghan mujahideen. yes the deadly network now working out of north waziristan but back and forth between afghanistan and pakistan and committed some of the most deadly attacks. >> guest: the attack on the u.s. consul in benghazi. i have full details in relation to that attack and might book because i was part of that is ambassador. lisa, as i see it it wasn't just admiral mullen. there has been a presumption that somehow if we can find just the right leader especially in the military, he would he able to turn around the state of