that's done not on just voter laws but every kind of a law. we see it in washington all of the time. it's what helps my party trumps what's the right thing to do for the country. it's not going to change until we address that more fundamental problem. >> is there something here about america's rapidly changing demographics. i know that chris hayes talks about this, but it was like when you saw black and brown people taking power, is this about demographics not being in the favor of the republican party, and rather than battling it out they will just suppress those voters. >> right, and you to back to to redistricting as well. the republicans gained control of several legislations in 2010. they redistricted themselves into power, and they pass laws that will keep them in power for a long time. in places like texas, for example, where they passed a very strict voter id law, that is a place where we see the changing demographics happening very quickly. there is a cramble to make sure they can hold on to their power in light of that. >> it feels t

laws. great a victory for birth control advocates this weekend with access to contraception is getting easier. and lenders is to prescribe birth control. the other ways the new law will help women's health. >>> women think governor brown with a round of applause is a sense into law a bill to increase women's access to corporate control. the state prepares to add 2 million people to metical in january of 2014 half of them women. >>> this is generally what's going to be available to women now. >>> adrian said the new law also have some benefits for women's health. >>> a great way to get folks into the health center not only are they getting access to birth control but also an education a time to counsel them on other birth control options and safer sex options. >>> easing its ban temporary health care providers are lenders to dispense the hormonal birth control devices. >>> it's very tough in redding and clearlake the northern communities where there's all lot fewer health-care providers this

law? how would this disenfranchise people. >> none of us want in eligible voters participating in the system. the problem is the purging pros, the he will i'll voters caught up in these new laws, so when we look at purging, we really want to look at purging practicion that are transparent accurate, and legal and that way we're not really catching the eligible voters. right now we're working with a lot of inaccurate lists. kind of a great thing with the voter photo i.d. laws. instead of stopping in eligible seaters, we're finding people has recently changed their name because they got divorced, people who voted for 70 plus years and now don't have the fold i.d.'s with their current address on it and are disenfranchised. we're disenfranchising millions of voters, while they cost millions of dollars and they're a solution in search of a problem. >> let me ask you, for example when they're doing a punch of voter rolls because people, they don't want non-citizens voting, how are they determinin

and having those contracts and not following the federal law, it was a federal law. 1963, john f.ennedy signed into law pay equity. equal pay for equal work for women and minorities. and we had title seven in 1964. this was not the law. i was two years away from retirement at the time, and i thought about it. i really thought about letting it go. that is why this decision was made and jointly by me and my husband, because i knew if i started it, these cases, they are not solved overnight. they are not solved in a year. they drag on for years because corporations and large employers have deep pockets and they can wait you out and will wear you out. i knew when i started to fight, i would be in it for a long time. but that is not who i am. i had to fight and stand up. i could not let a major corporation in this country not adhere to federal laws and treat me and my family -- i thought about all those years how much my children did without and how hard they had to take jobs to get through college, working two jobs sometimes, but my son and daughter, to help themselves get through col

law.s overwhelmingly bipartisan effort basis former president, with the new johnstone sign the legal voting rights act into law. i'm reminded of the continuing importance of the law. panels of judges appointed by presidents of both parties have found that texas intentionally discriminates against minority voters and redistricting and failed to demonstrate voter i.d. law does not impose greater restrictions on minority voters and without the voting rights act, these changes to election will be in effect. when dr. martin luther king said the act of the moral universe is long for justice, he captured the steady progress we see a relative few that continue. the foundation of the constitution and the bill of rights, not the civil war transformed to embrace equal rights and human dignity by abolishing slavery, guaranteeing equal protection of the law for all americans, prohibiting racial barriers the right to go to my continue with the 19th amendment expansion, the right to vote for women's 26th

the laws in this area are strict compliance laws, and they are very specific. the federal law since 1990 indicates issues from 1998. all businesses, such as a grocery store, a dentist's office, restaurants, a doctor's office, virtually anything that a member of the public comes into the -- comes into needs to be a barrier-free. we will go over what barriers are. every public accommodation needs to be wheelchair-accessible. there are also other other forf disability. most of the issues we are hearing about are wheelchair accessibility issues. there is a small group of private individuals who are wheelchair-down that go around the city and they look at small businesses. and i dare say anybody in small restaurants have some accessibility issues. it is another attempt at making your building wheelchair accessible. i am not sure which of you may be merchants and which it may be landlords. the law applies to both. and that means you were 100% liable for any barriers to access and any damages that may be associated with those barriers. there are ways you can defend yo

the sheriff is the head of a law-enforcement agency. i do not think the sheriff should be an example of reform to justice -- reformative justice. the sheriff should be someone who follows the letter of the law, someone we can all emulate. i would certainly feel that this has been violated. chairperson hur: ok, i think probably -- i appreciate the views of my fellow commissioners. i appreciate also that i am clearly in the minority here. i think they are very informed and wise use. i will say one thing, in response to commissioner studley. you are right. the language is all over the place. it could be interpreted as the people wanting to be broad. one reason i think people did not want to be so broad is because the power it gives the mayor to suspend an elected official without pay while this entire process goes on, i think, is pretty in store -- pretty extraordinary. we might become more efficient, going forward, but it is still going to be disruptive. i want to protect future mayors and elected officials from a provision i am concerned

law. -- we produced a draft of foreign investment law. the first draft was considered disappointing by many possible investors. some changes have been made to this. i believe it has been approved to be a lot more attractive than the last draft. whatever laws are produced, without the rule of law, without the kind of judicial system that will be there to make sure that the laws are upheld and obeid, it will not provide anyone with the security of the freedom to operate effectively in our own country. while the united states seems to be concentrating a lot on the economic aspect of its relations with my country, i hope they will do in full awareness of the need to promote the rule of law. and to help the president and executive to carry out the reforms they have in mind, as well as to what the legislature to strengthen itself as a body that will protect the people's interest through the laws and the laws they simply have to get rid of. there are many laws that do more harm than good, but not

seven laws in six states limiting the right to vote and voter suppressive laws. so the really the big issue now is making sure that voters are educated where they are that we continue to push back against these restrictive laws and that everyone understands what needs to be done in order to vote where they live there. keisha gaskins so well so thank you so much for joining us tonight thank you tom. after the break there is one thing one thing that every american has to understand before the november election it's absolutely crucial for the success of our nation in the future clay what it is and i still take. you know how sometimes you see a story and it seems so for lengthly you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else and you hear or see some other part of it and realized everything you thought you knew you don't know i'm tom hardy welcome to the big picture. here is mitt romney trying to figure out the name of god saying that your motives paul. the far left doesn't want the usa to defeat terrorism. i mean terrorist cells in your neighborhood.

ilya somin is a professor of law at george mason university law school. his research focuses on the constitutional law, property law and the study of the popular participation in the implications for the constitutional democracy. he currently serves as the co-editor of the supreme court economic review, one of the country's top-rated law and economics journals. a summa cum laude graduate of amherst college, he earned an m.a. in political science from harvard university and a j.d. from yale law school before he clerked for judge jerry smith of the u.s. court of appeals for the fifth circuit. his writings have appeared in some of the nation's top law reviews as well as leading newspapers, and he too, like john, is a regular contributor to the conspiracy. like john, ilya was once a cato in turn. for those cato in terms that are out there watching us coming you, too, can maybe one day become a professor of law. as other of our interns have done over the years. today, ilya is a cato adjunct scholar and he continues in that capacity as well. so, would you pleas

the law has a bright line. it says if you engage in a wongful action, there is a defense called the insanity defense which never works as most of us know because we don't recognize it. should we recognize it, that's an interesting question. should we have a more robust concept of diminished responsibility in light of the understanding that some people have less control over their preferences and desires or should we have better sentencing schemes or get rid of incarceration and come up with different models of trying to deal with punishment once we understand people have wrong selections. i think those are all interesting questions, but is there free will? well, the fact that almost everybody in the audience raised either their right or left hand contemplated it and were quickly able to act and respond. that to me says, yes, there is. now what do we want to do about it? now that we understand that those of us in the audience or up here that like chocolate cake may not have control over it, how do we want to acc

hosted by the university of law school. -- university of colorado law school. this is an hour and 15 minutes. [applause] >> there is a great expression, let me say a few words before i speak. those few words are to thank so many people. i want to start with the chancellor, who has been incredibly supportive of bill law school. we are so grateful to have you here. thank you for your support. we have several regions to hear dubin -- regents here. we thank you for all of your support and your spirit. we do very much believe in engaging with the community and we want to continue to do so in many ways. in terms of the energy she has brought, this lecture was her brainchild. recognizing that, the chase award was given to her for her leading work in community center. i want to acknowledge her. [applause] finally, all of you make such a difference to us. when i think about what makes us successful as a law school, having a diverse, inclusive, collaborative community of outstanding students, faculty, along, and friends gives us a fabulous advantage. this community can c

that makes homicides more legal or justifiable like stand your ground laws do also. for a sions fund almost all of alex alex money and the koch brothers have a serious and vested interest in alec as well they've given over a million dollars and koch industries have been one of the select members of alex corporate board for almost twenty years and the participating legislators on alec overwhelmingly conservative republicans introduce these proposals as their own ideas without disclosing that corporations pretty much crafted and voted on the bills except for that one time that florida state representative rachel bergen forgot to remove the alec mission statement on a piece of legislation she introduced last year to lower corporate taxes hoops also alex boese that has over one thousand of these bills introduced by legislative members every year with a one in five and acted into law the relationship between these billionaire donors policy groups the n.r.a. wal-mart and local government officials is all undeniable and is all held together by millions of dollars and cold h

in history to grant a river with a legal identity what this all means is that when it comes to the law the river will have the same rights and interests that a company does however this is not the first time a country has made a revolutionary move to protect mother nature last year bolivia passed the world's first laws granting all nature equal rights to humans it's called the law of mother earth and it authorizes eleven new rights for nature including the right to life to exist the right to continue vital cycles and the right to not be polluted while this may seem bizarre to some the concept of protecting the commons goes back to be getting of humankind the commons are the resources that are shared in common with them communities and it's really quite logical when you think about it why wouldn't we work to protect the very resources that every human being on this planet needs to survive in the age of privatisation pollution and the. of these natural resources mother nature is left with no voice the environment and the voiceless critters of this planet can't speak out that's why we nee

seven laws in six states limiting the right to vote and voter suppressive laws. so that really the big issue now is making sure that voters are educated where they are that we continue to push back against these restrictive laws and that everyone understands what needs to be done in order to vote where they live there. keesha gaskins so well said thank you so much for joining us tonight thank you. after the break there is one thing one thing that every american has to understand before the november election it's absolutely crucial for the success of our nation in the future call you what it is and i still take. i think tonight's accusing dates in believe me or just a one to to execution date is enough for anybody to go through in one lifetime. you know more than fifty percent of the people who are executed texas are not. white you know living on death row is like. this it's like you know we execute our convicted capital murder we have the highest execution rate in america we're not afraid to do it we do it well this becomes a point when death becomes. our avenue

the state laws and the local law says that there's still smoking inside of restaurants. and the ordinance does not allow or provide any provision to allow restaurants or cafes to smoke indoors or outdoors. and i -- or any type of business to smoke, if they're located in a residential building. and since june 2010, nile cafe knew, through meetings with me, phone calls, we've had several phone calls, and notices. the first written notice was the denial of the exemption that went out november 2010. the second notice was the notice to comply. that went out august 2011. and then there was two notices of violation issued on 2012. and that was all before we even met with the director of public health. so nile cafe h written notificas between november 2010 and may 2012. but they still made the choice to violate the health code. and therefore there should not be reversal or reduction of the suspension or order. the nile cafe once they comply with the suspension and want to -- they can contact me and we'll be willing to meet with them but i think they need to comply with the law f

so we could reform the laws in that way.ere is a possibility that we should just eliminate the ethics commission. it's appointed by the departments that are at city hall. so they appoint their friends, which makes it inherently somewhat difficult for them to perform the job they are supposed to firm. this was created in 1993 and it was said to have created an extra layer of bureaucracy and i think that is playing out. >> thank you. experts say there is a 62% chance that an earthquake causing widespread damage will strike san francisco, or the greater bay area within the next 30 years. what new polices should the city institute in order to minimize the human and economic costs of the next big one? this is a question for miss breed, mr. davis and miss johnson. >> i think that we all -- we are already doing some of those things. for example, many of the new buildings, we're making them as sturdy as we possibly can. we're doing a lot of retrofit projects. part of the work that we do -- i raised over $2.5 million to renovate the

laws. well, the reaction to that was everyone knows that the equal protection clause is about racial segregation, racial discrimination. it has nothing to do with women. and if you asked the framers of the 14th amendment, what women have the right to own property in their own names, sue and be sued, they would say, certainly not. if they were here today, the idea of a quality has growth -- the idea of equality has growth potential and it was meant to have growth potential, to keep up with society as it changes from generation to generation. one of the earliest arguments made was in the 1870's by a woman who thought she should exercise the most basic right of citizens, should be able to vote. so she wrote the equal -- so she invoked the equal protection clause and the court said, of course, we agree with you. women are persons, but so, too, our children. -- are children. no one will think children have the right to vote. that was the attitude in the 1870's. i think the idea of equality and d

. >> we will enforce federal law. >> too much federal law and state law and local law. it's killing jobs by making were illegal. illegal jobs. that is our show tonight. ♪ >> and now john stossel. john: i tried to get the permits to open a legal emanates stand outside the studio, but it was almost impossible. fortunately when kids sell lemonade authorities usually ignored their excessive loss. and that's a good thing says -- says michael whole house, an entrepreneur who made big bucks when he sold the computer company started. and then your 10-year-old daughter asking for a turtle and what happens? well -- >> she wanted the turtle, too many pets, so of course i said the next morning she gets this great idea to start a lemonade stand because -- john: she wanted the money to buy her own turtled. >> exactly right. this is kind of how america works. if you want something start a company and created. it was the most unbelievable day we had together. and it really got -- i saw the light poles go off and her head. for the first time she really understood how free enterprise wor

we also discovered that many of these employers were profiting from the law by charging surcharges in the name of employee health care and then pocketing the majority of the money that was collected from consumers in san francisco. so, given that workers were not receiving the health care that we all intended them to receive, it was unfair that the vast majority of businesses and something else that we found out that in fact the vast majority of businesses are covered by the health and security ordinance in san francisco are doing the right thing and are following not only the letter but the spirit of the law. and so it was in response to these concerns that were raised to us by workers, by consumer advocates and a number of people in the community that we introduce legislation to close this loophole sx, the legislation that we introduced was a very simple reasonable piece of legislation that said that when the health and security ordinance says that you have to spend money on health care, the word spend or expenditure means spend expenditure, means making an expenditure, not collecti

current law requires the v.a. to ensure that those receiving grants under the per diem program meet safety codes. however v.a. lacks the rules to make certain that their per diem grants are subject to the same rules. we must make sure that the services they need in a safe and secure environment this would allow us to do so in a more comprehensive, effective, and efficient manner this was introduced by my good friend, david mckinley, and i thank him for his advocacy on behalf of the homeless veterans trying to rebuild their life. it would require an open pit registry to be mane taped this provision would also require the v.a. to develop a public information campaign to inform eligible veterans of the registry and periodically notify them of significant developments in the study and treatment of the conditions that may be associated with burn pit exposure. it would direct the v.a. to contract with an independent scientific organization to develop a report on the actions take ton collect and maintain information on t

we do law enforcement and issue reports but at the end of the day i think the law would provide clearer rules of the road for everybody which would benefit the business as well as consumers. i also think there is a particular law of the contras who could pass with respect to the data brokers and the transparency and around the the the broker practices that we discussed a few minutes ago. >> how does the ftc work with congress etc. when it comes to privacy? who takes the lead? >> we do with the congress tells us how to do. they have givery expensive law dealing with privacy. it is an unfair practice law in the the general not be enforced. we also have the laws in particular areas that we enforce involving children's privacy, financial privacy. some medical information to read and when i said financial, it is in some context, medical inflation in some contexts. so, we are very much involved in the privacy and we of the federal trade commission or leading privacy law enforcement entities. the fcc has a very important role when it comes to the carriers and when it comes to other entities in

like the emergency manager law for several years.he original law goes back decades to 1990, to give it a scope of the economic crisis in this state. politicians have been trying to position themselves as reformers and rescuers of the economic situation for decades. so it is not a new idea in the state, although when the republicans took over the legislature in 2010 and the governor snyder took over the governor's mansion the same year, we sought an intensified push the out-we saw an intensified push of an earlier law which basically gave the governor, as you said, the power to elect one person, a financial tsar to essentially shred collective bargaining agreements and the city level. the origins of the law and those pushing for it are sort of connected to a nationwide network of free-market think tanks including the mackinac center. five years before the law was passed, the mackinac center released an editorial calling for improvements to the regional emergency law including the power to assure a collective bargaining agreements. all

law. very strict laws protect our free speech rights in the united states and making a controversial film even if it attacks a certain religion can't be prosecuted under free speech u.s. laws an not a hate crime. >>> you just brought up there are laws against someone running into a theater and yelling fire, to incite something. this man had to have known if you put out this type of video that that would incite a melee, attacks, something. could it be attacked up der that provision? >> you raise a good point. it goes that point directly. i'm sure when he made the film, he was trying to be provocative and trying to anger those over 1 billion muslims worldwide. however, yelling fire in a theater, that's a crime but not's not an expression of a political view or of an art form. on the other hand, making this vicious film, an attack on a religion is a form of artistic expression. we may hate it, we may disagree with it. what makes us americans under the first amendment, we can express ourselves

are the laws shortchange indiana have had laws since before barack obama every came into office and you know what's funny about george in indiana was minority norty voting is actually went up since they had the voter i.d. laws whether it was clear of the person right or we seen would almost almost thirty eight states i mean this year rolling this kind of legislation out i mean we've seen a movement of sorts but even more so that you know every great gain in this country has been about including people in democracy the civil rights movement women's lib these movements have been movements that have included people into the democratic process now all of a sudden it's very strange that we have a movement to exclude people from the democratic process i find it amazing but you know obviously there's a difference of opinion here we'll come back with more conversation more of tonight's extended edition of the big picture rumble right after this break. you know how sometimes you see a story and it seems so for lengthly you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else and you h

two dozen corporate law firms and lobbying firms. and some 1000 state legislators, a few democrats, the majority or republican. >> alec is a corporate service for legislators and corporate special interests that eventually the relationship culminates with some special interest legislation and hopefully, that lives happily ever after as the alec model. unfortunately, what is excluded from that is the public. >> in the wisconsin state house, mark mccann is trying to expose alec's fingerprints whenever he can. by one count, over one-third of fellow wisconsin lawmakers are alec members. >> when you look around, and lot of members of alec print front row, alec. when you start going down to the chair of finance and other members, are all alec members. row by row, you can point out people who have been members of alec over the years. one category is how to reduce the fact of government in the other is, this model legislation in the corporate good. profit driven legislation, in other words. how can you open a new market or private has someth

two dozen corporate law firms and lobbying firms. state legislators a few of them democrats, the majority of them republican. >> alec is a corporate dating service for lonely legislators and corporate special interests that eventually the relationship culminates with some special interest legislation and hopefully that lives happily ever after as the alec model. unfortunately what's excluded from that equation is the public. >> in the wisconsin statehouse, democratic representative mark pocan is trying to expose alec's fingerprints whenever he can. by one count, over a third of pocan's fellow wisconsin lawmakers are alec members. >> when you look around especially on the republican side of the aisle, a lot of members of alec, front row, alec, when you start going down to the chair of finance and some of the other members are all alec members, in fact the alec co-chair of the state, row by row you can point out people who have been members of alec over the years. there's two main categories they have. one is how to reduce the size of

i thought federal law would crump sta trump state law. >> it can especially if it's a school gettings from federal government or state government. you have to be in compliance with both laws. >>> let's read another statement. the school's superintendent in cranston rhode island. we will move forward and do what we are supposed to do. hopefully the law americas will listen to what the public has to say. we are expecting some sort of public hearings on this. there's a real out cry. a lot of people are upset about this. >> it's an election year. this has become a hot local issue. there's a guy running for senate there he has made it a center piece of his campaign. if you get me elected i will make the law. one of the providence papers were running an on-line poll 97 percent in opposition. >> that one girl can stay home if she doesn't like it but gis people get offended. giving us the breakdown of this one. >> or take your grandfather or take another man in the neighborhood that you are close with. >> thank you, heather. it is now 48 after the hour. still ahead, frightening new numbers a

laws are very popular and make sense to people. the people who support these laws say they're needed to avoid voter fraud, but in previous elections and the primaries this year, we've not seen a significant number of people charged with voter fraud. democrats who are fighting these laws state to state say it doesn't have anything to do with fraud, it's just a plan to keep minority voters, including blacks and latinos, away from the polls on election day. as you might imagine, some of the biggest balttles over these laws are being waged in some of the most important battleground states like ohio, pennsylvania and florida where the election could be decided if it's a close race. they appeal to the secretary of state as to whether all voters will be allowed to go to the polls on saturday, sunday and monday before the election. the state stream court told him he had to make sure there is enough time for voters to get i.d.s. and in florida, it's been a bruising battle over voting rights for the better part of the year. democrats won a f

laws? because i don't know much about them. >> i know there is this new change going on. >> i know you having to have the date on the i.d. >> didn't know if it actually passed. >> students have to have an expair ration date on their. d.s. this is brock's, not barack's student i.d. can i see your i.d.? do you have it? >> there is no expiration date on it. >> no expirate date on it. >> i need an expiration date on it? >> why? >> that's part of the new voter i.d. laws. what do you think? >> that's ridiculous. >> we are 18, we should be able to vote. >> it's makes it less convenient to vote. >> it's a hassle, people might not know about getting the extra sticker. >> this new vote every i.d. law has never been around in pennsylvania. what do you think the purpose of the is? >> to detract a large population from being able to vote, and a lot of kids will not -- a lot of kids will not know exactly what is going on when they go to try and vote. >> pennsylvania could be swayed by a number of student

we are just talking about rule of law meaning to say rule of just laws citizen laws, laws of to do with crimes. it all started with a crime. because the way in which the parties handled it was seen as inadequate. everything became worse. >> we have time for one more question. this actually came from an email and the question is, what can members of the pro- democracy movement known as the 88 generation, many of whom have been imprisoned in the past, as well as other activists, including exiles, do to contribute to burma's peaceful transition? what is their role? >> i don't think that all those who belong to those activist groups have to do just one thing. each person has his own strengths and weaknesses. each person has his own talents. i think they have to choose. some may be best taking part in humanitarian activities. some may be best going into politics. some may do best in other directions such as literature, arts, etc. so i don't think that just because there has been activists in the past, they all have to be lumped together and they should all be expected to do just one thing. t

- enforcement -- a law enforcement officers should never run afoul of the law or commit anything thatuld be charged as a crime and the law enforcement officers should never be convicted. the key witness said you get convicted, you should be fired immediately. that is not the case in san francisco. there have been many law enforcement officers that have been conducted reaching have been convicted of misdemeanors and have remained on the force honorably. there is a two-part process. you determine whether thereó' is official misconduct, and then you decide whether or not this was a correct use of the mayor's discretion. i would maybe add something to that, as suggested in the brief. and i think if you did find some level of official misconduct, you could make the recommendation that it does not warrant removal. the mayor has argued -- law enforcement has a special duty because they are required to investigate, required to do certain things. you could look at what happens with judges who can be found to uphold the law and apply it fairly. i personally know several judges who have been con

a law that not only requires photo i.d. polling places but did not allow student i.d.'s to be used concealed carry i.d.'s however were just fine here's part of his celebre tory speech. to our duty to ensure that it watches are fair. reproach accurately reflecting the will be. that's what voter id is all about. we're fucked in the will of the people in the room with governor perry and those who look like them may have in fact been to more accurately what the law is all about now perhaps that's why a few weeks ago three federal judges voted unanimously to block that texas law finding it intentionally discriminatory but there are many more still in the works i'm talking about states like ohio and pennsylvania in traditionally democratic districts in ohio hours at polling places that were decreased later brought back after a lawsuit by the obama administration that law still may head to the supreme court and later this week in pennsylvania the state supreme court there is scheduled to hear arguments on the voter id law you may

we, as a country, have not enforced the law. because of that we're at the situation we're at today. >> reporter: hernandez is ineligible for a driver's license in arizona. on this day, she's going to have her photo taken for her deford action application, essentially breaking the law to become legal. she worries mitt romney would end the deferred action program leaving her ineligible for the job she wants in alternative energy when she finishes grad school. president obama will legalize more undocumented immigrants and keep his deputies busy chasing smugglers. >>> so, just how different do you think the two candidates are when it comes to gun laws and gun control? well, i'll tell you exactly where they stand, next. >>> florida officials under fire after going back on a pledge to ease up on purging voter rolles. >>> this is new movie scene, a dramatic jewelry heist, right there, caught on tape. ♪ [ male announcer ] every car we build must make adrenaline pump and pulses quicken. ♪ to help you not just to stay alive... but feel al

it's, um, an unfair and deceptive acts and practices law is the general, um, law that we enforce. we also have laws in particular areas that we enforce involving children's privacy, financial privacy, some medical information, and when i said financial, it's in some context. some medical information in some context. so, um, we are very much in privacy and in many ways we at the federal trade commission are the nation's leading privacy law enforcement entity. the fcc has a very important role when it comes to the carriers. and when it comes to other entities in the mobile space. so we work with our sister agency on these issues. >> host: and would it be possible to have a dual system where, okay, if you want this app, you can pay a buck a month for it, and we won't track you, or you can get it for free, and we get your information? is that in our current world? >> guest: i think it exists in our current world. i mean, i, you know, amazon's kindle to begin with, there are lots of other, um, entities that say we will target you with advertising, you know, for one price, maybe free or

, and the case law in california supreme court, you have heard similar provisions under state law and the evidence presented to this commission, under the common sense and wisdom of the commissioners and for what is right, not for the share suburban and for our city, -- for the shares department and for our city, we ask you to sustain these charges. the commission has received a great deal of evidence in this case. most of it has come from the mayor and has been unchallenged. the mayor presented nine witnesses to witness and britain have to marry. the sheriff -- through written testimony and witnesses. the sheriff has only chosen to cross-examine two of them. the facts are not difficult to understand in this case. i will go over them in a moment. but first, i want to address the law that the commission is going to have to apply and address specific questions that the commission has asked the parties to address in interpreting the charter. the legal basis for removal is met. the sheriff seems to argue that even if i acted wrongfully and terribly under the law, a technicality permits me

they have given us a very expensive law dealing with privacy. it is a general law that we in force. we also have laws in particular areas that we in force involving children's privacy, financial privacy, some medical information, so we are very much involved in privacy in many ways. we are leading privacy law enforcement. the fcc has a very important role when it comes to carriers and other entities in the mobile space. >> would it be possible to have a dual system? if you want this app, you can pay $1 and we will not attract you? or you can get it for free and we get your information. is that in our current world? >> i do think it is in our current world. there are many entities that say we will target you with advertising or for one price or maybe free or a lower price, if you do not want to be advertised to come here is what the product will cost you. i think we might move into a world that is more along those lines and that does develop into that kind of business model. as long as the disclosure is clear to consumers and it is up front and as long as the type of data collection

not just through laws need to be passed in certain countries like inheritance laws and property rights. >> antisex trafficking. >> yes,. >> global human bonding. >> and insuring there is enforcement not just passing the laws but criminal enforcement of the laws. but there are other things that can be done that should be done in the community not necessarily through government. it's done through churches. it's done through ngo's. so we need to recognize that not all the work needs to be done by government. we should look to the communities because especially because in many of the countries they are not countries that have the individualistic mindset that we have they are countries -- >> this is what we are seeing through the state department through u.s.a. id. the funds are being filtered into the middle east countries and areas with huge transition and the money is going to train and arm these ngo's and organizations on the ground to work within the communities. what we do see is it is a far more effective channel than us going in as americans and telling us here is how you should imp

and having my when i wrote the law i believe in it >>> now wants to repeal the law. he backs proposition 34 to eliminate the death penalty proponents say the issue is not one of morality also about money. in cases cost the state an extra $100 million a year much of that in lawyer fees for appeals >>> california spent $4 billion trying to enforce capital punishment for billion dollars for 13 people makes no sense economically. >>> polls indicate the vote will be closed mark klass hopes voters defeated >>> if proposition 34 passes and richard allen davis taken on death row then he wins and we lose. for paul is memory may be pauly did die in vain >>> i feel for mark what he has gone through personally life without parole does not mean richard allen davis has won. in voting on the death penalty californians white economics against the motion as an anguished father is white for justice touches on. john blackstone cbs news >>> to oakland raiders fans were is sad by high-voltage line at the tailgate party police were called to oakland coliseum it looked like the fans were t