turning it into a positive, bridging the gap between law -- between the law enforcement community at the state, local, or even federal level. the men and women i represent are doing a phenomenal job in assisting state and local partners bridging that gap. and that's what's important with faith & blue. and partnering with the reverend, you are doing an outstanding job with your team, and i'm happy and proud to be a part of that with my team, because we know that that is beneficial not only to the communities that we serve, but also beneficial to the people we represent, because it makes them much safer. it gives them the ability to know the communities they serve, the communities they patrol, the communities they are helping protect from violent crime in america. and that is an important message to send to the men and women we lead, that we have your backs. 100% of the general public is behind you. although there may be that 1% out there that turns around and tells you, the law enforcement guys are the bad guys, but that's not true, because when you need help, you called 911 -- when y

that is, it is already an effective law, and here are the norms of this law. they are in the law .here are other laws about television and radio broadcasting, but they are not included in the law on media . they don't improve these norms, you know, we don't know how to implement it. therefore, maybe we will do it there in the second reading, well, it's absurd, you understand, because in fact, if you want to change something in the second reading, it is logical to leave the norm of the current laws to leave the status quo and then try to improve it, it is obvious that the purpose of this is non-improvement, namely the demolition of this norm so that these singers can once again play here on our tv and radio the list of persons who threaten national security, you rightly mentioned the mechanism that has been in effect for 7 years in fact, after the revolution of dignity, it was introduced and it is very important, it not only prohibits concert tours, but in fact, a person who is included in this list of fascist artists cannot be shown a film or series with her participation, and not

that's what i understand from critics of the laws. what's gonna happen to those who refused to leave? so in danish law, you can contest an eviction, and you can go to court, and this is what some of the residents are doing. they go to court to fight against this. this eviction is stating that this is a discriminatory law until now we haven't had success in being sports. so residents are taking this higher and higher up hopefully going to the european human rights commission. mama, you know, there's another aspect to this story right now. the fact that the danish government decided to take in ukrainian refugees fleeing the war in ukraine and that a majority of denmark's parliament voted to amend the these, these ghetto laws to make exceptions, to exempt ukrainians from these housing restrictions. what does that say to you? because there are many critics that are saying that this proves that these housing laws are discriminatory. what do you say? this is the one more proof to done lowest? let me know, make us said making the law in denm

several important draft laws failed. were not enough votes for the law on the service in local self-government bodies was rejected, he was rejected , the draft law on changes to the fight against terrorism was rejected. although i think that it is very right that we rejected the nonsense that we wrote after that the chairman decided that it was necessary to gather at the homes of everyone, according to me, we had not already considered five bills. of course, this is an important appeal. my colleague correctly says that there were several appeals today, and it was not only about the nuclear plant, but at the end, we had a document regarding the violation of international humanitarian law by the russian federation. this is an absolutely key story, because we all hope that we have already memorized this thesis that it is important not only to defeat the russian federation physically on the territory of ukraine, it is important not only to defeat them it is important to expel from the territory of ukraine a foreigner of 1991

, what is included in this law, why did it arise because the first e-e project of the law was adoptedby the committee two years ago, then there was not a whole series of laws that we adopted further e for the e protection of the ukrainian media space e-e and there were other laws that were adopted e-e and in principle in the previous version this were regulated, but this version does not have it. well, i have not yet said that it will be possible, for example, to show films that glorify the nkvd and the kgb and the organs of the aggressor country, and many other such points . this law, because if they are not transferred, then this law will cancel those norms and they will not actually apply, and we will return to the situation that existed not only until the 19th year, but also somewhere possibly until the 17th year or not only until the 20th or on the 21st because there are many progressives we have adopted new laws now, therefore there are a number of such points that obviously bother me personally and this cannot be the case, and in addition there are points that actually return u

so the term has moved from the law now. and since the last election, but still the content of the law is the saying and the media still uses this word when talking about it. and the signal has already been sent out to people which kind of treatment they can expect, which kind of stigmatization and discrimination, or they're going to stay in this country based on their ethnicity. all right, well we have run out of time. we're going to have to leave the discussion there. thanks so much. all of our guests mohammed us long and full tma to see and thank you for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website, algebra dot com. and for further discussion, go to our facebook page. that's facebook dot com, forward slash ha, inside stuart. you can also during the conversation on twitter, handle that insights from emergent room and the whole team here. uh huh. bye for now. ah a there that is a region of wonder i'm joy tragedy and yes of violet. but it doesn't matter where you are. you have to be able to relate

prosecutors enforce the laws. they prosecute people for violating the laws. legislatures make laws. your representatives are elected by you to write into law the rules that you support. you get to create the parameters of your own society. that's called democracy. but when a prosecutor decides which laws are valid and which laws are not, that is the most basic subversion of democracy. andrew warren has done that for six years. the list that the governor just read is just partial. andrew warren also decided that he would not force hb1, the law that increased penalties for rioters. warren refused to prosecute 67blm rioters in the summer of 2020. he said there had been no breach of the peace in tampa when there most certainly had been, but he decided to ignore because he agreed with their politics. most recently warren declined to prosecute a gang member accused of shooting into a house with children inside after shooting somebody else. turns out the gang member was likely a biden voter. so he got a pass. people who aren't biden voters have had a much tougher time in andrew warren's ju

i ended up going into law. law became my passion. it still is my passion. susan: you tell the story about the phone call that changed your life. the suggestion that you can -- you might serve as a judge for one day. could you tell that to our audience? ladoris: i would love to. there are some things that some states have that is called a judge pro tem program. it means in latin, for the time. it means judge for a day. it is a way at least in my court, where lawyers would get phone calls. i got a phone call from a judge who said we have a judge pro tem program and i'm trying to make it more diverse and have people of color participate. would you like to be a judge for a day? can i put you on a list? my answer was sure. i had never thought about being a judge. i never thought i could wear the black robe. these cases were small claims cases. people were suing each other and at the time, the maximum limit was $5,000. in california, you can suits -- sue somebody in small claims court for up to $10,000. one day, a few months later, i get the phone call. your name

he's a professor of law at ucla school of law, the author of numerous articles and volumes. he's also an author of [inaudible] post racial america. he lives in los angeles. he will be in conversation with paul butler, a former federal prosecutor who provides legal [inaudible] for msnbc and npr and has been featured in 60 minutes and profiled in the washington post. a law professor at georgetown university, he's the author of let's get free, a hip-hop theory of justice. winner of a media award and [inaudible]. he has published numerous op eds and book reviews including the new york times, the washington post, the boston globe, and the los angeles times. so please let's welcome them. thank you for being here. [applause] >> good evening, everyone. thank you very much for coming out. it is my pleasure to have the opportunity to engage you in this way. i'm looking forward to your comments, your reactions, your questions. before we get to all of that, i would of course like to thank you for hosting this event and thank paul for agreeing to be a moderator. thank you very much, paul

of law. we're here because rick is written a terrific new book cheap speech how disinformation poisons are politics and how to cure it. you want to ask rick number of questions about the book and talk with them about it. and then what very much to get your questions, so please be sure to send them in to the youtube chat. rick i find the title of the book quite provocative when you call it cheap speech. what do you mean by cheap? speech? well first let me thank the commonwealth club for putting this form together. i would have hope we could by this time be doing it in person, but hopefully next time that we're together having conversation. we'll be able to do it face to face and thank you erwin as always for agreeing to be the interlocutor here. so the term cheap speech is not mine. it's a term that originates with a professor at ucla law school in eugene. volik. he wrote an article in the yale law journal back in 1995 where he was talking about the coming information revolution as in many way

major proof under laws that -- which groups are you going to attack with your law.was myself in the confluence that i came with this proposal, that maybe they can think about this law once again. then we can still live in our homes in the future. but they really changed the proposal of the law. this is major proof of how things are going on in denmark. this decade and last decade. >> i want to ask you about this development. i have read that residents in these areas that have been designated as ghettos, that some of them are suing the danish government for racial discrimination. from your perspective, how strong of a case do they have, especially considering this exemption to the ghetto laws that was made for ukrainian refugees. >> we have heard from experts in discrimination and danish law, saying residents have a very strong case. so we are very hopeful. however, the danish courts don't have a good track record of challenging the parliament. we are hoping for the best, but we think that we might have to take the case higher up in order to challenge these laws. esp

into law. -- and be signed into law. feel, quite honestly -- i don't know what the chair feels about this -- we have a sense of urgency here. as soon as we turned the corner into january or into another lengthy two-year presidential election, my personal feeling is we need to button this up before the end of the year. that will set the clarity to move forward for this next election. so i know i might get the answer that none of you think that you can tell congress on they should and how they should pass things but since you are here in your personal capacities i would like to know if you have an opinion on the urgency to get this wrapped up by the end of the year. mr. gore, i'll start with you. mr. gore: thank you, senator. i presume to tell congress but i certainly agree now is the time to act. it is a beneficial piece of legislation. it's pending before the congress now and the moment is here for congress to act. >> i would like to say it's a personal privilege i enjoyed visiting you when you were the ambassador. inc.

there continues to be an escalation in incidents of law enforcement tragedies where law enforcement are hurt. there continues to be an increase on our law enforcement professionals. police officers are leaving the profession more than before. officer suicides are up, scrime is skyrocketing. we have been marching in the wrong direction. that is why i am committed to marching with law enforcement, because together is our only path forward. i want to thank our national partner organizations who are here. i am going to ask the leaders of the national association to join me on stage. this is why we are doing it. the american people are watching. when i was growing up, there were two things i was taught to preach about. there was one, hope, the other, faith. hope suggests that we hope crime will decrease. hope says we hope officer incidents will decrease. hope says we hope that our communities will be less aggressive. hope says that little boys and girls and communities of color will not be judged by the color of their skin, but the content of their character. hope says that, i hope and wish

took place today, the developers hope that the deputies will vote the law is in the first reading in fall, and already in december after the final approval, the president will sign it, olga chayko with details, ukrainian mass media are preparing for new legislative realities already in the fall, deputies must vote on a new law on media after the eu gave us a clear perspective on membership, ukrainian laws must correspond to european ones in addition, there is a war going on in ukraine, so the media law developed a few dozen years ago is hopelessly out of date . modern approaches to the regulation of the media market are no longer television, they are no longer print media, and the legislation must be modern. the law is being developed again in partnership with eu experts, who especially emphasize the independence of the national regulator of the ukrainian national council for television and radio broadcasting and emphasizes that the independence of the change this is primarily protection and support for the subjects of information activities, not those of possible censorship. olga ge

any state law that prevents hospital from fulfilling its obligations violates federal law. the justice department will also be filing a motion to dismiss the texas lawsuit challenging hhs's guidance. the law could not be clearer, and we are going to vigorously litigate this suit to ensure women get the emergency care to which they are entitled under federal law. led by the associate attorney general the department's reproductive rights task force will build on efforts to protect reproductive freedom. it's work includes monitoring state laws that infringe on federal constitutional protections, evaluating appropriate actions in response to those laws including filing lawsuits and statements of interest and coordinating technical assistance to both congress and the states on the federal constitution and statutory considerations. five weeks ago i promised that the justice department would work tirelessly to protect reproductive freedom and we would not waiver from our founding responsibility to protect the civil rights of all americans. that is what we have done, and that is wh

this is a draft law on amendments to the law of ukraine on the collection and accounting of a singleontribution to mandatory state social insurance and some other laws of ukraine on the protection of the rights of individuals under during martial law and simplifying the accounting of workplaces for persons with disabilities, i put proposal 74-33 to include this issue in the agenda of the session of people's deputies simply to vote for 256 decisions were made and supported the construction of electronic communications in general, it is simpler the procedure for obtaining land for the placement of mobile towers with energy companies with lace companies with osbbs houses i urge you for good stop pressing stop pressing let's find a compromise so that all the subjects of this chain are satisfied and so that our residents received all services at normal prices, i hope that it associations and deputies lobbying for their interests are glad to hear from me. thank you for your attention. i propose to accept in the second reading and in general with the necessary technical and legal amendments

as long as the country is under martial law, it is not possible to change the basic law, but how willhave time to reform here? the constitutional court without changing the constitution. and this is all related to the fact that we have to meet deadlines that are self-imposed. well, in fact, none of the laws that include all the points change the constitution, so it is absolutely realistic to vote them all in the verkhovna rada, so when some politicians there will say no, we don't want it, they just don't want to vote for some other reasons regarding the constitutional court, it's a draft law already registered, i think we'll even be able to pass it in the coming weeks to the first read to vote, in fact, all draft laws are registered except for national minorities or communities, as they used to be called. there really is still an end to the discussions in the form. i think it is also a little secret, because there is a question: how should russia act during the war? did not take advantage, well, in fact, it did not start influencing from the inside, telling that we will protect the ru

broadcasting, this law on treason, this law on the press, and so on.here is a sufficient number of them, and it really is. - the second problem is that we are trying in wartime, now we have a war going on. we are trying to work out a law that would work in peacetime, it is very difficult to do , because we all live in the matrix now and we want it as much as possible protect uh the information space of ukraine from russian propaganda and so on and so it is very difficult to maintain a balance between the interests of the state there, for example, freedom of speech during the war and to maintain this balance in this draft law so far, everything looks like it will be possible to do it, but you have to keep a close watch and it is very difficult to do it because a large number of legal norms . the beginning of a full-scale the invasion of the russian federation into ukraine and appeared on the airwaves, the telethon appeared, the only news, it was on the airwaves of several ukrainian tv channels at the same time, and the minister of culture and informatio

laws, that's when you're going to _ and laws, that's when you're going to he _ and laws, that's whenc news. our top stories: the usjustice department is ordered to release a redacted version of the evidence that prompted the fbi to search donald trump's mar—a—lago home. safety concerns at the zaporizhzhia nuclear plant in ukraine, after the russian—occupied site is temporarily disconnected from the national power grid. russia should agree to demilitarised zone around the plant — demilitarised zone around the plant and agreed to allow an international atomic energy agency— international atomic energy agency visit as soon as possible. drought and record temperatures in china threaten rivers and crops, putting several provinces on a national red alert. and — back from the brink. the large blue butterfly has its best summer in 150 years.

federal law invalidates state laws that are in direct contradiction. this has really nothing to do with anything that the supreme court said, and certainly nothing to do with going around the supreme court. >> thank you all. >> thank you. >> appreciate it. ♪ announcer: c-span now free mobile app. keep up with floor proceedings from the u.s. congress, white house events, campaigns and more from the world of politics all at your fingertips. you can also stay current with the latest episodes of washington journal and find scheduling information for c-span's tv networks and c-span radio, plus a variety of compelling podcasts. c-span now is available in the apple store and google play. download it free today. c-span now, your front row seat to washington anytime, anywhere. ♪ announcer: c-span's the weekly podcast brings you over 40 years of audio recordings from our video library. comparing the events of the past to today. >> in this episode of the weekly, we remember katharine graham by learning from her, specifically her leadership secrets, her skills, gr

a veteran's health care law.undbreaking chips and size laws so that the future is made in america. -- science laws so the future is made in america. determined to get the job done for the american people, and they can look their children their children in the eye, we make sure that democracy delivers for your generation. now, i know that there are those here today who hold a dark and despairing view of this country. i am not one of them. i believe in the promise of america. i believe in the future of this country. i believe in the very soul of this nation. i believe in you, the american people. i believe to my core that there is not a single thing this country cannot do when we put our mind to it. remember who we are. we are the united states of america. there is nothing beyond our capacity. that is why so many foreign countries decide to make chips in america. billions of dollars, we are the best. we have to believe in ourselves again. i am going to take action that i have been looking forward to doing for 18 mo

the reason it was not worse is because law enforcement officials did what they do. they showed amazing courage by running toward gunfire for the seng lar purpose of trying to save lives. it is a fact that because of their quick response getting on the scene, being able to respond to the gunman, and eliminate the gunman, they were able to save lives. >> the governor's description of the police response turned out to be false. days later, he would say he'd been misled by his briefers. here is what we know. at 11:28 a.m. on may 24th, the speeding ford pickup truck crashes into a ditch outside the grounds of robb elementary school. the surveillance video camera overlooking the parking lot of the hillcrest funeral home across the street shows two witnesses to the crash approach the pickup. the driver fires at them and they run. they then call 911. the 18-year-old gunman, now out of the truck walks toward the school. a teacher inside calls 911. >> he's shooting. the kids are running. oh my god. get in, get in your room! get in your room! get in your room! get in your room

federal law invalidates state laws that are in direct contradiction. this has really nothing to do with anything that the supreme court said, and certainly nothing to do with going around the supreme court. >> thank you all. >> thank you. >> appreciate it. and low income housing for renters. this is just under two hours.

she is a professor of law at the chicago-kent college of law. she is the founder and codirector of chicago-kent -- from 2014 through 2016, she served as illinois solicitor general while on leave from the law school and is a former law clerk to justice stephen breyer. her scholarship is focused largely on the supreme court, its relationship to other courts , institutions and its role in our constitutional democracy. she teaches classes, constitutional law, employment law and policy. council with the brennan center for justice where she focuses on voting rights and elections. she recently co-authored an article examining the history and original intent of the constitution's elections clause. she was a litigation associate in private practice and served as a law clerk to the honorable christina snyder of the u.s. district court of the central district of california. she received her j.d. from harvard law. you are now recognized for five minutes for your testimony. >> thank you. for the opportunity to testify. >> i will address two issues in my open

opponents who love those labor laws and oppose the e.r.a. as a threat to those labor laws. and you also have conservative minded individuals who do not like labor laws, but they are still opposing the e.r.a.. so both conservative and liberal protectionists believe that women required special protection. they just deferred and where that protection should come from. so, for conservative protection this women's protection to primarily come from the male head of the household. they thought that government reform efforts, like those special labor laws, undermined has been governing authority in the household. now, liberal protectionist believe that government reform efforts could also serve as affective instruments of protection for women. even with those differences though, you still have, like i said before, liberal and conservative protectionist believing that women needed special consideration and special protection because of their roles as mothers and caretakers of the home. a shared desire to preserve the possibility to treat many women differently on the count of psych

you agree work all of the laws.cases came before him, put in place a prosecutor who upheld the law, governor could do it today, in new york city in network state. it has not happened. it must happen. trey: you have proven it can be didn't winning 3 times, i think you beat a guy by the name of cuomo. thank you for your service and joining us on i sunday night. >> great being on with you, thank you. trey: up next. more nominated primaries were held this week as november elections about 70 days away, adam laxalt trying to remove chuck schumer, he is joining us next on "sunday night in america," righ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ all-electric with room for up to seven. it's the suv electric has been waiting for. the all-new eqb from mercedes-benz. ♪ ♪ vo: hi. we're zerowater. and we believe everyone deserves the purest tasting water. that's why we strive for zero. you see, to some it means nothing. but to us, it means everything. here, take a look. this meter showing triple zeros means our five-stage filter did its job. and that virtually al

well, some laws have been repealed, some laws - been repealed, some laws haven't.etained these laws, partly because other colonial powers did not impose this law, they did not criminalise homosexuality, for example the french empire did not do so. and so it was primarily x british colonies who retained these laws, like section 377. who retained these laws, like section 377-— who retained these laws, like section 377. and when you look at why this _ section 377. and when you look at why this is — section 377. and when you look at why this is happening - section 377. and when you look at why this is happening now, l at why this is happening now, one of the most famous examples a few years ago was india, now we have got singapore, is there something specific about the time we are living in that is now galvanised momentum around this issue? ~ ., , this issue? well, there has been a global— this issue? well, there has been a global shift - this issue? well, there has been a global shift in - been a global shift in attitudes towards lgbt rights over the last few decades.

incredibly important job, to help local law enforcement, federal law enforcement. identify the ballistics. a whole range of things. for seven years, we finally got it passed this time, barely. seven years because they didn't want anybody in that job. my plan gives the bureau the funding to hire more agents, to stop gun trafficking, and by the way, there's a lot of states that don't allow you to purchase certain weapons in the state. you just cross the state line and buy it next door. bring it across the state line. keep guns -- you know what the mexicans -- mexico, which has real problems, causing us real problems, you know what their biggest complaint it? can't we stop gun trafficking across the southern border into mexico? there are certain gun dealers that are basically, not gun dealers, they're wholesalers, providing the weapons to anybody who has the money. folks, look, we can help local law enforcement, we can solve more gun crimes if we have someone heading up, which we finally do, this organization that's designed to track this kind of behavior. finally, my

that enforces the law. the way to interpret the laws to resolve the dispute in a specific case. he didn't like particularly federalism because it would serve as an impediment for him to be the savior of the american people during the great depression. you've got to interpret the commerce clause to give calmer -- to regulate anything. pretty much everything affects this. it's like the butterfly effect the concept that a butterfly or swarm flapping wings and the amazon summer in brazil will affect wind currents and weather patterns. the supreme court thankfully had alreadyy rejected the argument presented during woodrow wilson's time in office. culminating in a case called -- that dealt with a specific type of child labor. when fdr came along they stay close to that precedent and they pushed back on it and they invalidated a lot of fdr's legislative agenda. this happened in slow motion over the course the next four years they got tired of losing by the time he won re-election in the fall of 1936 he said that'

law ruling struck down such laws as the child labor laws minimum wage laws and laws that require safe working conditions they held that the natural law freedom of contract in the natural law right to property created rights for businesses and corporations that rose above the efforts of the government to prevent the ills that they created. they put the so-called economic rights into a zone of protection so high that even reasonable laws aimed at curbing corporate excesses were struck down. again known to propose going all the way back to this lochner area but there are those who wish to employ the same reasoning that was used in that era. today natural law proponents, but they term new economic rights and new property rights have called into question many of the most important laws enacted during this century. laws protecting the environment, our water and our air. laws regulating childcare and senior citizen facilities. even called into question the constitutionality of the social security system. george thomas, you have made it abundantly clear that you do not subscribe to the most e

if we go back to the uniform law of commission, do we develop a model of law? good idea but it would take 30 to 40 years. we met a talented physician and lawyer during our duke visit. we came up with an idea. how about a one sentence amendment to the state medical practice act were smart they all existed in every state at all. nothing in that language shall prevent a physician from delegating into a specially trained nurse or physician assistant that they are qualified to carry out certain tasks. as long as they are carried out under the supervision control and responsibility of the license physician. we completed our hundred page report to the director of health manpower in hew and got the endorsement. with that, we rallied health care leader starting with the presence of the ama and the aha, federation of state medical board to encourage state legislators to act immediately. they did. by 1973, within three years, states had amended their medical practice act to a qualified assistance to work in collaboration with and under the supervision of physicians. the l

if we are still having this kind of raise this no laws in denmark, i thought my in these laws that, that were pastor, there is also a requirement. the children are from the age of one half to spend at least 25 hours a week. and child care in order to receive mandatory training in, quote, unquote danish values. do we know how many children are undergoing this and, and also what kind of an impact is it having on them? i mean, is, is having a traumatizing effect on the children. actually, we don't know how many children are being subjected to this, and we don't have any numbers on this issue because nobody is collecting any numbers. this is the thing with the so called get to laws at some big experiments. it, but nobody is collecting any data, nobody is actually looking at what's happening in with the people who are affected by these laws. and this is a big problem that people's and that the government is intervening in people's lives without talking to them or looking at how this is affecting them. if ultimately let me just ask you my last question here. i want to talk for a moment about t

law.n the day roe and casey were overturned, we promised that the justice department would work tirelessly to protect and advance reproductive freedom. that is what we are doing, and that is what we will continue to do. we will use every tool at our disposal to ensure that pregnant women get the emergency medical treatment to which they are entitled under federal law, and we will closely scrutinize state abortion laws to ensure that they comply with federal law. i would now like to welcome associate attorney general vinita gupta, who is the head of our reproductive rights task force, to the podium to share more details from our complaint. >> thank you, attorney general garland. the complaint alleges that idaho's law is contrary to emtala because it presumptively criminalizes all abortions, making it a felony for doctors to provide emergency treatment required by federal law, even where a denial of care will likely result in the death of the pregnant patient. the idaho law flatly prohibits

the law currently _ they could do. the law currently offers - they could do. online. collector culture is a term used to because many of the men collect these images in large repositories.- these images in large re ositories. , ., , , repositories. the problem is the law only _ repositories. the problem is the law only focuses - repositories. the problem is the law only focuses on i repositories. the problem is the law only focuses on the | the law only focuses on the kind of malicious ex—partner sharing an image, the kind of revenge porn. and this only covers a small number of cases of intimate image abuse. back on the same — of intimate image abuse. back on the same reddit _ of intimate image abuse. back on the same reddit group, our investigation also found explicit images of at least 150 different women as well as thousands of nonconsensual images and videos. reddit told us it safety teams regularly take action against communities and uses for this behaviour. mr; and uses for this behaviour. my messaue and uses for this behaviour. iji message out and uses

and watching the long arm of the law for long enough, well, most people do find out the law catches up. and the law is not supposed to care how long you been running, how long you got away with it, how long you made the long arm of the law maybe stretch. and during that time you may have felt like a powerful, furtive, effective criminal outrunning the law. the law doesn't kerr about that, and it doesn't care who you are. that's the whole point. we turn now to a very special guest here to join me one-on-one, andrew weissman. has much experience as a prosecutor, fbi general counsel, senior prosecutor of the mueller probe and someone who does care about the independent prosecution of the law in america. thanks for being here on this big news night. >> you're welcome. glad to be here. >> your view of this news, what the search entails, and that final point that some people do damage to outrun the law for a long time but not necessarily forever. >> so, i'll do the last point at the end. but i had sort of two reactions to what happened. the first is i was really struck by the fact that this

that law should be. and i can talk about that later. i don't think we should underaccount the ways in which the ways a rich business vow against loyalty to their country has a sort of a political relations effect. one of the things that i talk about what happens in the charter. they are chartered by the states and incorporated by the states and the states give them charters so they can be legal corporations and that is, in itself, a deal that the u.s., that the state governments are making with groups of merchants. the deal is that the insurers get their corporation, which allows them to accumulate capital in a variety of convenient ways and pass bylaws that affect its members and what they're getting from the united states government is sort of this, what's the word? this endorsement from the government that says they are safe and secure and so then the insurers are doing all of these good things on behalf of the american merchant fleet in a way they're sort of repaying this bet that state governments h

enforcement exceptions in every one of those laws if law if there is a belief that law from from law enforcement based on information they receive that there could be a threat to life. privacy goes out the window if there could be a threat to life and it should i mean, you know, i'm i'm gonna go through a door because i'd rather as an agent as an fbi agent. i'd rather have you sue me than me have somebody behind the door get killed. sure. can you think of any sort of examples of the school or business who's really implemented a reporting system that is incredibly effective everyone sort of bought in. have you seen that kind of happen or is no one really quite there yet? that's a good question. okay. so here's what i would say. there are since columbine. there's no question that safe to tell out in, colorado. has stepped up and been the the center of attention for how to do that. you can look at say it's safe. sa fe with the number two. tell t e l l safe to tell it's an anonymous reporting system, but there are anonymous reporting systems all over the united states now that you can th

so congress stops making the law and delegating to the unaccountable bureaucrats.hat in a nutshell is why we are $31 trillion in debt today. all these things came about as a result of the plan that failed legislatively. >> i have other questions. if you have a question raise your hand and one of my colleagues will come to you with the microphone. we will start down here. the microphone is coming your way. i happen to be a graduate of woodrow wilson senior high school washington, d.c. which they just changed the name by the way. in the event that the current president of the united stateses does not. in the social conservatives, whatever label due to what can we do or should we do legally speaking to prevent harris from making the next supreme court appointment? >> your question if president biden c doesn't complete this tm of office, what can we do to prevent her from being elected. >> by operation of law she r wod be president. >> what can we do to stop her from putting a new one on the court? >> from making the next supreme court justice appointment. we have an e

with its repeal, we are one step closer to equality before the law. ., ., ., , .,, the law.ve people in singapore — the law. how long have people in singapore been _ the law. how long have people in singapore been fighting - the law. how long have people in singapore been fighting to l in singapore been fighting to get this law off the books? the first challenge _ get this law off the books? tue: first challenge was get this law off the books? tte: first challenge was mounted get this law off the books? "tte: first challenge was mounted in parliament in 2007, by way of a parliamentary petition. there were two sets of court challenges in 2010, and 2013, and three sets of court challenges starting in 2019. so what happens now, legally speaking? what is the process? a bill will have to be tabled in parliament and the law formally repealed. t5 in parliament and the law formally repealed.- in parliament and the law formally repealed. is this the end of the — formally repealed. is this the end of the battle _ formally repealed. is this the end of the battle for- formally repealed.

. >> upholding the rule of law means applying the law evenly without fear or favor. under my watch, that is precisely what the justice department is doing. >> there you have it. it may sound like general terms, and that's very deliberate. this attorney general so attacked and maligned by the former president is going out of his way not to reveal anything that would not be legally proper, while also defending, as he has every right to do, what the department is doing as well as explaining at a level that's legally valid what they're doing. but there is way more news. garland announcing that this justice department sees a legal and valid path to providing even more facts about that search of mar-a-lago, and that is why today, and this is big news, in some ways this is the biggest news of the week, and i know that sounds like a lot. but this justice department is going to now ask a judge to unseal the trump search warrant and the list of property taken by that legal force out of the possession of donald trump's compounding. . >> the department filed the motion to make p