the european union requires ukraine to change this law, why so? european commission expects that the ukrainian authorities will fully take into account the recommendations of the venice commission to the law on the constitutional court. about this in the comments the spokeswoman of the european commission, anna, told the public that the reform of the constitutional court is one of the seven points that ukraine must fulfill in order to join the eu, and this law was supposed to guarantee the independence of the constitutional court . what happened instead? on december 13, the people's deputies voted for a bill on improving the procedure for selecting candidates for the position of judges of the constitutional court even before this vote, experts in the field of judicial reform called on the deputies not to vote on the document in the version in which it was prepared, as experts had warned the wording does not envisage an independent constitutional court, rather the opposite, but the deputies did vote, less than a week has passed since the venice com

let's vote for the law. trends, but in the law itself, in the text, in a state place.ell, thank god, not everything, although practice now shows that it is possible to capture everything else, but at least it is with that television channel of the council , that is, again, it is still wonderful, the name is wonderful, the motivation is that we need to be eurographed, but uh, we push it inside what is what the authorities want. it seems to me that even at one time these demands when ukraine received membership, there were seven demands that were put forward if it should be turned off before the start of negotiations on membership. it was necessary to push through this law. it seems to me that this is exactly the approach, without even delving into the specific wording of the law, it is already flawed by itself. i can agree with mr. and one percent is such that it spoils everything. well, how about my anecdotes, if we add one spoonful of one aromatic substance to a three-liter jar, we will get not 3 liters of jam at the output, but even the opposite, well, the key questi

what are the risks for and for whom does this law represent ?ervant of the people good evening good evening well, first of all, i have to tell our viewers why we invited you to this broadcast, because you are, firstly, an architect with experience, and secondly, you represent the servant of the people faction in the parliament, what is the leadership of the faction and parties in particular support supported this draft law and voted for it, well, not so actively but nevertheless, many deputies voted and you did not vote and now, to begin with, i will ask you to explain your position. why you did not vote here, there are two reasons, firstly, this the very procedural points of the draft law were discussed for a year and a half, but this discussion was not very correct, rather voluntarism, not all parties to the urban planning process were invited, and in fact, the opinions expressed by professionals were not taken into account at all, for example, at the last committee, the proposals that were submitted to the final version were not considered at

law on animal welfare i would like to note the title of this project in full: the draft law on amendments to certain laws of ukraine on improving the requirements legislation on food products, feed , veterinary medicine and animal welfare, a number of people's deputies speak with the co-authors and initiators of this bill, but the authority on the human rights organization.ua notes that this is really a brutal story that returns to our legislation those things from which we just recently distanced themselves from one of these norms , it’s as if you know the return to the production of foie gras in ukraine, or the killing of animals before their hearts stop beating. all this is so sensitive stories, but again, it is important not to forget that sensitive stories can sometimes be successfully manipulated. we asked danylo pavlychenko , a legal expert, to help us understand this issue. danylo, we congratulate you. glory to ukraine glory to the heroes. what did the human rights defenders actually panic about? of course, as you rightly said, society is now very consolidated and very sensitive,

law initially used for disloyal special law initially used for disloyal special law initially used for disloyal human rights activists and journalists human rights activists and journalists human rights activists and journalists for example almost all my colleagues at for example almost all my colleagues at for example almost all my colleagues at tv rain have been labeled as foreign tv rain have been labeled as foreign tv rain have been labeled as foreign agents we have been put in the position agents we have been put in the position agents we have been put in the position of parais personally but when nobel of parais personally but when nobel of parais personally but when nobel laureate dmitri muratv asked putin about laureate dmitri muratv asked putin about laureate dmitri muratv asked putin about this law a year ago putin again said this law a year ago putin again said this law a year ago putin again said that it was being implemented just like that it was being implemented just like that it was being implemented just like in america it is simple he said money in america it is simpl

you could have done so many things and you chose law. why did you choose law? elizabeth: i -- justice kagan: i am not sure the premise is right. i may have chose the only thing i am good at. i think i chose law for all of the wrong reasons. i just realized you were a history major. i was a history major at princeton and i was intending to go on and get a phd in history and then my senior thesis did me in. my senior thesis, as a history major, i spent a lot of time in a dusty archive. i thought, you know, this is a little too cloistered, not enough contact with the real world, with human beings. i didn't feel as though i would be happy doing it for my entire life, although i still read a lot of history. i'm probably went to law school for the wrong -- i probably went to law school for the wrong reasons. at that time, law school was somewhat less expensive than it is now. it was a common thing back in the 1980's for people to say things like, i'm going to law school to keep my options open, or i am going to law school because i don't quite know what else to do. i

not a single law can be analyzed.n’t know what exactly needs to be analyzed, as always in words, everything is simple as in practice, we will find out right now natalya anatolyevna hello hello natalya anatolyevna polishchuk head of the department of criminological monitoring of legislation and improvement of law enforcement practice of the scientific and practical center of the general prosecutor's office. you know that scientific research work is carried out at the center, taking into account the trends dictated by the time, which helps to track changes in general. is it possible to track changes in the framework of our activities, we regularly analyze various types of statistical data, that is, these are data from both criminal statistics and administrative and medical statistics. naturally, we analyze all kinds of materials, the prosecutor, skanadzorny practices, the results of various kinds of research criminological sociological demographic and the like, special attention, of course, we try to pay attention to th

i personally worked for the humanitarian committee on the law on media in this law.nion authorities depended on the fact that it was accepted by the new year, we worked a lot and for a long time on this project, which became a law, the work did not start until the convocation passed, but now it has finally reached the end of the document which came out. it is obviously much better than the one that was adopted in the first reading. we also managed to protect the ukrainian language in the mass media and prevent those people who violate the law or are a threat to our national security from the airwaves. the so-called black lists were also there, and sad norms are one of them this is what we actually brought back to life state television, we fought for denationalization for a very long time in order to fulfill again the norms of the rules of the council of europe convention, the documents of the european union well, the authorities still insisted on leaving the council as a state television channel, which should actually show the parliament, but in fact it does not. the

type law. there was no controversy about chaplain you the judge is making reference to the legislative and military chaplains. well, james madison say that they were unconstitutional. so, i mean that you're right, they weren't controversial, but everyone, the father of the constitution, they were a mistake. yeah, but but also the on the religious test office, the supreme court did strike them for states and mcdaniel v patty and picasso in the 1960s and federal constitution that the point is. yeah but if we relied on tradition alone and said whatever the founders did it would mean that religious test for office by incorporation that could have religious test for office. my only argument is tradition isn't enough. it's a it's a piece of evidence. but sometimes the founders actually their traditional practices were in conflict with underlying natural rights principles. and if you take a natural rights, then those traditional practices would be struck down. of course, there's a risk there, right, t

he was a constitutional law professor and it was fun to talk with him about law.he wanted to know a lot about my perceptions of the court. he turned me down for that and i went along with my business, an extraordinary job. the best job so that suggests when the second call came, living through the best job in america and not interested. would have been sg for 3 or 4 more years. the white house counsel called me again and said would like to consider you again. i went again for an interview, extremely bad because that morning as the bp oil spill happened, the president had other things to do, walked in and said to me i know you, we don't have to talk. okay. you are right, the bp oil spill. anyway. as the process went along, i could tell it felt differently than the first process. he offered me the job. was quite wonderful and i said yes. who was the first person i called? i called the person who i knew would have called me and that was one of the other finalists, was now attorney general garland and the 2 of us had known each other for quite a long time ever since i

type law. there was no controversy about chaplain you the judge is making reference to the legislative and military chaplains. well, james madison say that they were unconstitutional. so, i mean that you're right, they weren't controversial, but everyone, the father of the constitution, they were a mistake. yeah, but but also the on the religious test office, the supreme court did strike them for states and mcdaniel v patty and picasso in the 1960s and federal constitution that the point is. yeah but if we relied on tradition alone and said whatever the founders did it would mean that religious test for office by incorporation that could have religious test for office. my only argument is tradition isn't enough. it's a it's a piece of evidence. but sometimes the founders actually their traditional practices were in conflict with underlying natural rights principles. and if you take a natural rights, then those traditional practices would be struck down. of course, there's a risk there, right, t

law and reworked in a new way. by the way, the scientific expert department of the verkhovna rada made a lot of comments about the formal side of this law. when we talk about valery zaluzhnyi, i listened to his address many times. listen to him and pay attention. by freely leaving a part and it is not in the law, although in the comparative tables to the law and this is a constituent part of the draft law, it is described how it looked two- 402 disobedience before and what it looks like as of today, and in the text of the law , did someone specially lose this number 402, e.e., it fell out of law-making evaluation in general, article 409, which is massively presented to military personnel today, therefore i believe that this law will be returned as it should be rewritten taking into account reality it is not possible to punish a person for an action by unconditional imprisonment when it did not result in serious consequences, in some crimes there are, for example , in the failure to comply with an order, the occurre

iryna chiye some real mechanism, yes, because the draft law has already become law, signed by the president, i don’t want to, i don’t even want to be ironic, maybe there is a chance to send it to the constitutional court for consideration, because the law on the constitutional court would have a possibility to pass the check in the constitutional court as well. this is indeed unian, very serious, because today we have, for the first time, a serious threat to have an absolutely uh pocket constitutional court, this is very dangerous, because the constitutional court is a model for the entire judicial branch of government, which should be independent. i want to remind that now when we have such a story that in essence, with violations of the law, one of the judges of the constitutional court was appointed a penis in the weight - she is an associate of zelenskyi, she is one of the representatives of the servant of the people faction. only after that began to make general changes to the law, now they forced several members of the constitutional court to write statements of dismissal and we have

of the basic law of our country for a while.

have you read the law?nyone from those who are currently in the studio name the number of articles in this law? victor, let's now put the dots on and if i had read this law, i would have done these examinations, i would definitely have worked a little in another place and would have had more time for it, because i work here, for example, for six hours of direct ethene every day and my task, you asked if we, for example, raised the issue of those two years ago pickets literally a month ago, i showed these photos, reminded the work of the story and would tell the gram we are doing our work, our work is now, including a little forcing well, no all the viewers must now take that draft law , read it and figure it out, that's why we turn to you and ask for your expertise as a member of the national union of journalists of ukraine, in addition to being a member of the national union of architects, he specifically raised this issue in order to bring the degree of creative naming to the level of the article consider

those laws. for those who sell guns, those who distribute guns, those who traffic in guns and those who use guns illegally. for violent purposes. and what the chairman filled with notes is a fact that nearly a quarter of the children and the united states liveni with oy one parent. that is also more than any other country on the planet. and as a direct correlation to all the violence in our society, including gun violence. it is now time for us to proceed with this hearing. i'm looking forward to the compelling testimony of all those who are here today. what is also something, if you're going to come if you're going to look at this testimony it's important to look at root causes for this violence, and not focus solely on taking away second amendment constitutionally protected right. with that, mr. chairman, ion yid back. >> thank you. -- for his opening statement. >> thank you troubled jackson lee for anything this hearing. i think the witnesses for being here to inform this committee about of th

>> the law that we've written? yes. i've learned not to make about what the supreme court is going to do. but i believe that this clears a number of legislative intent, federal law. it would be upheld. i would also mention that in justice thomas's comment, no other ... [inaudible] raising concerns about the basis for the obergefeld decision but this provides an extra layer of protection. the act that was signed into law by democratic president remains on the is something we needed to remedy. >> a lot has changed in almost 30 years i guess. senator collins, you've been part of many working groups that have led to a bipartisan legislation. there's the chips act, a whole list of things. is this how congress should work moving forward or is it a symptom of congress? >> groups of senators coming together across the aisle can get things done. we've shown that with the infrastructure bill and the respect for marriage act, asian-american crimes bill is another example. the december 2020 covid bill and the work that joe manchin

i chair the law enforcement meeting. the reason comes together on a regular basis not just for hate crimes but to talk about instances of hate, whether hate speaks or acts that don't amount to a crime but are indicators that walk right up to the line in many instances and cross that line to get into actual hate crimes. investigating criminal acts and aggressively prosecuting them is something here in los angeles i enjoy great support for. the attorney would initially not file an enhancement when he first arrived here and we quickly found this was not an environment in los angeles that allowed for that. this has changed his posture as well. i am thank you for that. our u.s. attorney's office has been aggressive in identifying those involved in hate crimes and actually prosecuting them. i think the challenge we have in los angeles most recently has been with extremist groups such as the gdl that has come out and done a series of flyer dumps and neighborhoods on the west side. these are activities that given the state of ou

uh, keep a close eye on those laws.umber of laws were adopted on the initiative of members of the federation council, so i want to say that this year is perhaps a record year. uh, according to how many laws were passed, uh initiated by members of the federation council, moreover, in various spheres, both in the social sphere and in the economic sphere, in the financial sphere, concerning e, a special military operation to protect its participants, and so on. eh, well, in general, it's to say, in my opinion, about such a maturity of our society, when we are already talking about the need to pass laws that improve the quality of life. uh, certain categories of citizens for the next session. we also have a comprehensive plan, including initiative laws. we will certainly continue this work. and most importantly, i would like to emphasize that the budget for three years, which, as you understand, was formed very poorly

when we talk about alienation, the law actually in the law returns us in soviet times, when we had state uh, ut-1, or central television, which broadcast from moscow until unfortunately, we were a colony, so the retinas of our eyes, there are terrible norms, there is a norm that we are betrayed will monitor the internet... well, i can't fully imagine how it will work on the one hand. i understand that it is often necessary to do this, but to close sites... there to come with inspections when the ministry of justice did not approve the method of conducting these inspections and in general, all the documents that will be prepared for treason. no one controls them or approves them. they can come home to any editor of the site and say that he is doing something wrong and then close it. i am not saying that it will do like that in our country, there is a normal composition in our country advice but there is such an executive possibility. if suddenly someone in power wants to close any comedy , they will do it. they will be able to close even the youtube blog of a woman who will one day launch

and a belief that's the best way to do it is for the senate law and the bill to become law in the house bill, would not be improved over here in the senate and so let's take a short thing that is widespread bipartisan support and get it signed into law before the presidential cycle starts in earnest next year. >> have you gotten any commitment from leaders that it will be attached to funding will that will be signed into law before the end of the year. >> i've certainly talking leaders on both sides of the aisle of the spill and about the importance of becoming law and i'm agnostic as to whether is included in the rent funding bill, the bill that i hope we both so again or whether it goes across the floor as a separate bill but we've got to get this done and we do not have much time to do it. >> senator baldwin, next to the democrats will be - the senate and republicans are controlling the house and is there any sort of legislation and you think other than government funding if that's even able to reach the president's desk with that will be able to pass the house both houses of congres

it is in that same law . and what was actually being compel their so the lgbtq groups wanted to put up a banner with just their name and while other groups were putting the names of their groups so you can see an immediate parallel to the hypotheticals thatwere floating around about well, what if we just changed the name, it's no big deal, no harm, no foul . just thenames were changed in early and the supreme court in a 9 to 0 decision said you can't do that . i think there are really some strong parallels to that case that we relied on in our briefing and oral argument. >> what's at stake in this case, how would you distill it down to sort of its critical elements that are audience members will hear. >> you pick the broader forces at play. there is the underlying question of is this the same as race. public accommodations law when you think about it and by civil rights law is applied to it is because of racism, the civil rights struggle and water fountains and bus stations and all of . so a little asks color

i do think that when you talk about law enforcement there has to be a place where our law enforcement has the resources they need to really look for these cases. it's sad that we have so many cases that i think long forsman doesn't always take as seriously, but i think that if you have special domestic violence training where these law enforcement agents are spending time and understanding what's going on in the household, there is evidence to suggest that that kind of training is helpful in getting some sort of help to victims and ensuring that they don't continue to be victimized. >> thank you, our time is up. i yield back. >> thank you, i'd like to recognize that the chair of the full committee, chair woman maloney. >> thank you so much, robin, kelly. before we can grapple with the epidemic of missing and women murdered women of color, we have to get our arms around the scope of the problem. that is currently impossible because of gaps in federal data collection. as i've noted in opening statements, existing federal data excludes missing a latino latino women. those groups fall tog

that's law. i think, you know, it's bad law, but it's law.nd so then you ask the question, okay, well, how do we insure that we have appropriate respect for the, you know, what is the role of law and politics in a given institution. it think -- i think it varies, but if you're, like, on the judicial side, like within sort of the idea of stripping courts of their authority, two options with my to co-author, one is to to sort of, like, take the case away from the court entirely, right? slip their jurisdiction. there's no law here, so you can't decide it. we're just going to happened it to a political entity that gets to decide what do we want equal protection to mean, right? but suppose no. there's some legal content will. there's some politics but there's some law there. we offer a supermajority requirement for judicial intervention, ask that is practically a voting rule implementation of something like clear error review. sort of the old theory of restrained judicial review, sort of made famous by james bradley thayer. flagrant constitutional

i was able to pass my billing to law. this law helps tribes implement their own amber alert systems. and with education and training. hopefully this progress will move forward again. the dynamics of violence contributing against indigenous people is immensely difficult and challenging to understand. it is important to bring awareness to the challenges that indigenous people face on a daily basis. to bring attention to the obstacles that can only be fixed by lawmakers like you. i had a platform to share my story because there are thousands of stories that you got have media coverage. they have been silenced by fall into the cracks of the judicial system. i hope we can make changes that we desperately need. thank you for my testimony. >> thank you so much. thank you for sharing. you are now recognized for your testimony. >> i serve as the executive director for violence against native women. i want to speak with you about an impact on indigenous people. our goal is to build healthy families and communities. we do this by en

trial, it is a certain process, it must take place in accordance with the principle of the rule of law, that is why the prosecutor must work, the prosecutors must work to follow up, the collection of evidence, it is clear that this process must be launched before the victory, that is, as soon as possible, so that the victory is as soon as possible the time has come for the armed forces of ukraine to be able to choose it, we definitely need even more help from the armed forces, and germany still cannot decide whether to transfer leopard 2 tanks to ukraine or not, what is the reason for the hesitation psychology, how to change it, we are actively working on it, we are conducting therapy . this is a question of some kind of rational e-e explanation, that's why we are grateful germany really handed over to us the very important samples of weapons that i have already mentioned, these are really important things for us, we are grateful but we don't see any a rational argument against the fact that these tanks were handed over to us, which means that this is a question in the field of psychol

by the law because we are going to change the law. they're going to make it a weapon we go after. tell you this. the the miles per hour people continue to lose faith, trust, and confidence in a system that cherry picks what it decides to go after and go after in a way that is detrimental to the very form of government that we have. to be here today talking about this in the last hours of this session has nothing to do with what's good for the american people. it's a political hit job. it's sad, especially in this -- the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. mr. kelly: in this for the ways and means to do this at the end of the year, horrible. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from texas reserves. the gentleman from massachusetts is recognized. mr. neal: thank you, madam speaker. we were not granted this information until the supreme court ruled on november 23. we did not pursue this legislation at the last minute. we went through the regular order here. indeed with the gentlelady from california who did a great j

it is about the draft law 56-55.evening, an appeal to the president to impose a veto on it received the necessary 25,000 votes in record time and continues to collect supporters eh the public actually architects eh hmm other market participants note that this bill can be approved eh and only takes into account the interests of otak developers this is ms. solomiya's assessment tell a little more in general about how this bill was passed, what it changes and whether it is necessary for the president to think about his petting, first of all, i think it is worth noting that such a record, records, time for signing such a petition is already clearly evident , the attention of the office of the president, in particular, the president should be drawn to it if we report on such things, we will definitely put all the participants at the table who are related to cities, local self- government bodies, developers, etc. they insisted on a vote, they put the last item on the agenda and waited and kept it sick so that it would be v

that the draft law on the liquidation of this is an urgent draft law submitted by the president of ukrainet true that the urgency has been lost or the urgency has already been going on for a year, we see some urgent draft laws that are needed by the majority for some economically questionable things they keep it very quickly for several thousands. and this urgent bill, do you remember how well the wine stood for more than a year, well, urgent, well , the term is very urgent, the plant is urgent for more than a year and i finally got around to simply reminding and reading the stations just for him, and only after that there was a production of the order of activity of the fall. for sure, i want to believe that there is some better explanation . i know someone who cleaned something on the tables. oh, by the way, we are looking for a year. i can finally vote. well, i ’m kidding, of course. hey, if you want to add something, let’s talk. what about other bills, in particular, about such a rather scandalous one the draft law that everyone is already discussing as well, somehow it was pushed forw

become law. the house bill would not be approved over here in the senate. so let's take a short thing that has widespread bipartisan support and get it signed into law before the presidential cycle starts in earnest next year. >> have you gotten any commitment from leaders that it will be attached to the funding bill, that it will be signed into law before the end of the year? >> i have certainly talked to leaders on both sides of the aisle about this bill and about the importance of its becoming law. i meant -- as to whether it is included in it that year end funding bill, the omnivorous bill i hope we both still get or whether it goes across the floor as a separate bill. but we have to get this done and we do not have much time to do it. >> senator baldwin, next year democrats are going to control the senate, republicans are controlling the house. is there any sort of legislation you think other than government funding, that will be able to pass both houses of congress? >> we were just talking

what is wrong with this law?rcumstances, people can not say, but this is the reaction, and i, as an employee and a person who, in the nature of his service activities, are faced precisely with questions regarding the observance of the rights and duties of military personnel during implementation of er their er responsibilities er this confirms if briefly about what causes concern well, firstly it is on the doctrinal level er this draft law is a continuation of the very negative practice of the verkhovna rada of ukraine legislative body regarding thoughtless interference er eh in eh regulation of criminal law relations and eh criminal protest is also eh an ongoing process, we repeatedly talked about these eh cases in your studio for one or another reasons eh from various bills or changes to legislation and now just the one case, but if in general, as i understand it , there was a certain problem with the connection. now we will restore it. well, i want to remind you that now the situation in ukraine in principle i

, electronic surveillance law, wiretap law. but outside of the domain of law, in the domain of policy, in the domain of culture, and the domain of technology, that story hadn't really been told. and i had to be the one to tell it. >> sticking to the domain of culture, how is wiretapping, how is bugging, eavesdropping, how has it been portrayed in our media specifically cinema, throughout the decades? >> this was a very important story for me to follow. contrary to our understanding of electronic, surveillance particularly government, surveillance pointing here at the capitol building behind you. contrary to that image of wiretapping as the province merely as a shadowy surveillance tape it goes on behind closed doors, in the realm of shadowy government secrets, wiretapping has been a perennial point of cultural fascination. dating back to the 19th century. one of the cultural documents that i was thrilled to uncover as i was working through the sources was a kind of spate of pulp novels, tremendously popular thrillers produced i

k-9 handlers all trained as federal law complexity. fps relies on the team thousand contract guard staff will protective service officers are pso's conduct security screenings at more than 9000 federal buildings across the country. they are the backbone of the fps operation without the help of his guard that this would make real the transmission perfection of her federal buildings and properties about of utmost importance. violence against federal government buildings property and personnel is not in the norman has become more prevent in recently years and it's disheartening that we must worry about things and we must and therefore conversation today is added importance and relevance. we need to ensure that he is has the tools and authority to operate as effectively as possible. if not it ps in jail the government accountability high-risk list since 2003 j. ellis found it's not assessing risk at federal buildings consist with standards under the protection plant recommended in the free market yes plan. this is worrisome because failure

>> as ste law mike -- as a state law matter, i think it is hard to gi a answer. more selectivity a me individualized review is less likely to ba blic accommodation. i know i can't give you a bright line. but i think this is a familiar problem. tre's so much demand for our services tha we have to be selective who we choose. wouldhat, with this case come out differently then? >> i don't think so. i think a business that is open the public but has more business than it can handle so it has to be selec is still a public accommodation. >> mr. fletcher, when i read your brief, i h t sense that you and general olson parted wa on some matters. my hypothetical, i thought that you might find that more difficult thanenal off general olson and i'm wondering if i'm right authat. if i am right, why and what that says about yourrgent generally. >> i would start with the same observation is that this is a eech case. i think what that pushes on his kin the person who is providing services privately say i am not denying service because of status. i am denying that service because

that is law. i think it's bad law but it is law. and then okay, so what do we do?o we ensure we have appropriate respect one of the respective roles of law and politics in different institutions? i think it varies. if you are like on the judicial side with the courts and their authority. two options one is the sort of take the cases away from courts entirely restrict the jurisdiction but sorry there's no law here, you cannot decided one hand this to political entity who gets to decide when to be one equal protection to that is one version. suppose you think there's legal content there. there is some while there. another option we offer is a super majority requirement for judicial intervention for that is practically voting rule implementation is of that clear air review. again don't intervene in flagrant constitutional violation. famously courts do not self-restraint. one way to try to get at that as a proxy for is there really law? okay to get seven of nine injustices across the range of a bright oddly logical and methodology ranges we all agree it prohibits that

mykhailo that this draft law can get in hall a, except through the conciliation council, this draft law can enter the hall in the event of collecting 150 signatures of a-a regarding its submission to an extraordinary meeting, and despite the fact that we are in a state of war, we are not completely deprived of this right of people's deputies we can do it, at the same time, a similar initiative has already been initiated by the representative of the majority, oleh dunda, and as far as i know, several dozen signatures have already been collected, and in principle, part of the majority , despite the fact that the leadership really does not support the introduction of this bill in the hall or here i agree with mr. mykhailo, he very often finds the necessary votes for strange draft laws, a-a-m-m, about increasing criminal liability for the military or for a debatable draft law regarding the new rules on the construction market, it is among the members of the former opzz well , there are former members of it for life, this is prohibited by the russian party, and we really need to find a mecha

the law. if we are truly a country of laws and not men and no one is above the law, then the returns have to be exposed. i think that the public has a right to know what is in the returns, and the public has a right to know that there president is not a crook. and i think doing this will give the public some understanding of what type of person we are dealing with. after all we have to remember that president trump, when he was president, had many business deals going on. he was dealing with foreign countries, and there was a need to ascertain whether or not there might be a conflict of interest and to determine this we have a program that is mandatory for a president. a president has to be audited as well as the vice president, annually while in office. president trump was not in compliance and i think the cause of this not being in compliance we have to expose those turns. and i want the public to know that this is a time of great concern and i believe that we have an opportunity to demonstr

had no interest in teaching law. so i went to the dean of students it to be transferred. so there i was, i was stuck. and i went to the class. by the way, the big section of law was taught by someone who is just switching over from antitrust. moving from antitrust to constitutional law, so that was robert bork, who was not known at the time. he left too, he left he became solicitor general. so i am there with charles reisch, and he begins by going around the room and asking each student why did you go to law school? and he shouldn't be given he would say, no, that is a better answer. he debated each of us about why we went to law school to convince us that we should not be there, and the moral there is that there are no livable lives to be lived in the law. then he moved on and when he was finished with this, egot of volume -- he got a volume and david open up to a particular part and tell us a story. one partner was terribly irascible, he would call he gets into the office and he would berate them and he would yell

of state, but this law is signed of the constitutional court of ukraine, well, in particular, the law on developers caused complaints. and by the way, an interesting story happened during the continuation of the topic of the law on e. the authors of this law and it is interesting that they supported and helped the majority of the verkhovna rada, which is made up of representatives of the servants of the people. well, they have more people's deputies than all the others. they were helped in this vote by the former those who will continue to work with the e-e mandates of people's deputies in the verkhovna rada of ukraine well, this is one story so that they did not help, there was a certain cover regarding this law and it has not yet been signed especially since there was a petition on the website of the office of the president of ukraine in which i urged the president of ukraine not to sign this law, she gained 25,000 votes in less than a day, the required 25,000 votes well, in principle , the president has not signed this law so far . a people's deputy who before that came to a servic