it's a law that requires that our law library is suitable space. right now the law library is in the memorial building. previously it was housed here in city hall and the memorial building is is going to be closed and all tenants have to be out by july. it's going to cost the city hundreds of dollars a month. this is suitable and sufficient and is going to a delegate the department to finalize the lease. they determined 22 thousand feet was sufficient and it includes compacting shelving for the law library. this passes unanimously. the controversies arose from the advocates they have thirty to 35 thousand square feet of space. this included a request that we house a volumes for the law library. and from my prospective were facing increased costs over $5,000 and not particle sure at this time this we should be paying to house additional rare books that the law library is requesting. the law library has raised zero fund on their own. this 20, 25 square feet we're signing the lease for although it has additional space they can rent additional space bu

and we need to update those laws. the last time the electronics communications privacy act was updated was in 1986, and a lot has changed since then. >> host: grover norquist, what kind of access do law enforcement officials, the government, have to our e-mails right now? >> guest: it's not traded as if it's regular snail mail. they can go into it if it's been parked with a third party, put in the cloud. what we need to do is just update the law to go alongside the changes in technology instead of sending each other letters, we send each other e-mail. instead of keeping your letter in your pocket or your home, you may store it in a cloud somewhere. and that needs to have the same privacy that your regular snail mail does when the post office delivers something, and we can do that. we've updated these from time to time as technology changings. they have to do this more often because technology's been changing quicker. but you send someone an e-mail, it's like sending them a relater. it's the -- letter. it's the same th

ironically, most law enforcement officers disagreed passage of this law.he reason is, we recognize that citizenship goes to the united states of america, not necessarily to the united states of alabama. >> christians feel that we have a responsibility to help those in need. theertainly demonstrated needs to the needy and alabama is a state with a lot of poverty. the neediest, those at the bottom were immigrants. we had eight or so congregations, hispanic congregations. all of these were just devastated overnight. >> there's also many misconceptions about illegal immigrants. many believe they don't pay taxes, take american jobs and reap american health benefits. >> a lot of people believe that illegal immigration is an issue because of the misinformation that is out there. you also hear that illegal immigrants take health care but when you fill out a form you have to prove your citizenship to acquire those types of benefits. theyso hear a lot about don't pay taxes. well, immigrants do pay taxes, when they rent a property, when they buy gas, when they pay fo

the law needs to catch up. of abuse, youlot need the law. if there's not much -- they are both arguments for reforming the process. is the president of the fbi agents association. he has been listening to the conversation. we invited him to listen to the conversation. [laughter] how are fbi agents and other law e-mailment folks using searches? how often are they doing it? is pretty broad. it covers the whole range of government. it is a fairly complicated answer. from the fbi point of view, we are conducting general criminal and national security investigations that followed are one type of legislation, but also civil inquiries that fall under different regulation. center asking about the fbi, for the most part, we are seeking content from service .roviders that is not necessarily true for every branch of the government. it has to be between criminal investigations and civil investigations. i'm afraid there is no one-size- fits-all answer really. there are different types of categories. >> are they valuable? >> the searches are valuable. it

kind of law? nobody says, well, why bother having laws against murder or robbery since murderers or robbers won't respect those laws. no one says that. but the go-to argument against gun reform is that gun laws should not exist because they might be broken. once they are broken, what good are they? now, though, now that some parts of the country are deciding that that's a dumb argument, now that some parts of the country are deciding you can make that argument but you're not going to win with that argument and we're going to enact new gun laws anyqueue, now the anti-gun reform argument is evolving. it's evolving beyond the criminals will break laws argument and they're getting now into the harry houdini competitive lock picking part of the argument. it started this week on fox news channel, of all places. >> his mother was a legal gun owner. how do you know this person that his mother would not have obeyed the law and limited the magazine clip and then adam ran today would have been limited to ten

law-ag citizens. we have seen the newtown parents here in washington bravely telling their stories. they deserve better than this body turning their backs on them. the families of aurora deserve better than this body turning their backs on them. the families of more than 30 people who die every single day at the hands of gun violence deserve more from this body. my friends, it is simply time to act. today is the day for this body to show the american people that their voices matter. that when 90% of americans demand us to expand background checks, that we can deliver. we should be able to agree today that we no longer need military-style weapons and ammunition clips on our streets. and we should be able to agree today that it's time to crack down on the illegal handguns being trafficked in our streets into the hands of criminals. four years ago, i met the parents of naisha pryor yard. naisha was a beautiful 17-year-old honor student killed in the prime of her life by an illegal handgun when she was ju

in fact congressman ed markey a democrat from massachusetts a decade ago now got a bill passed into law got it in acted it's the law of the land calling for potassium iodide distribution out to twenty miles away from us atomic reactors a brilliant thing to do very wise just because mary stopped to have the potassium iodide in place in case a nuclear catastrophe unfolds in the united states they don't happen slowly they happen very quickly as we saw at fukushima the the pills have to be close by i should hasten to add that the pills would only protect the thyroid against radioactive iodine one thirty one it will not protect you against dozens of other radioactive poison so it's really to protect your thyroid during the evacuation and then for some weeks and months after you've evacuated to protect you against radioactive iodine contamination of food and water but the bush administration and the obama administration have both dragged their feet they have not implemented this law it's hard to tell if it's been carried out anywhere certainly not adequately covered in the next question for y

retailers know this law and well informed that it is illegal to sell to minors, virtually know this law that i encounter. the san francisco department of public health provides a mailing every single year for the last seven years to all 1100 retailers, with all of these items in your packet you will see a copy of it in these four different languages. in fact we just sent ours out this year, at the first week of march. so just so you know, all retailers right now have just received the informational packet talking about sales to minors, and in addition when they applied to the state and the board of equalization to the tobacco sort of handling license and they received the education and there is an agency that some of it comes from which is an enforcement agency that does inspections locally as well. there is a lot of opportunities to be educated about this and we at the department of public health try to do a great deal of prevention to be sure that everyone knows about the law. why is the city actively enforces? there is reasons related to health and addiction, and the stores that brea

we need to update those laws. the last time the electronics communications privacy act was updated was in 1986 and a lot has changed since then. >> host: grover norquist what kind of access to law enforcement officials in the government have to our e-mails today? >> guest: right now it's not treated as if it's regular mail, snail mail. they can go into it as a third-party and put it up on the cloud. what we need to do is update the law to go alongside the changes in technologies that are sending each other letters. we send each other e-mails instead of keeping europe letter in your pocket you may stored in the cloud somewhere and that's should have the same privacy that you regular snail mail does in the post office delivering something and if we can do that. we have updated this from time to time, the technology changes. the technology has been changing quicker but to send someone an e-mail is like sending them a letter. it's the same thing. the fourth amendment is still there. >> host: also joining our roundtabl

kind of law? nobody says, well, why bother having laws against murderer robbery since murderers and robbery ris won't respect the laws. once they are broken, what good are they? now, though, that some part of the country are deciding that ats dumb argument. now that some parts of the country can make the argument but you won't win with that argument and we will enact new gun laws anyway and the anti-gun argument is evolving. evolving among the criminals will break laws argument and they are getting into hair harry li harry houdini argument. >> his mother was a legal gun owner. how do you know this person would not have obeyed the law, and then adam lanza, would have been limited to ten rounds instead of 30. >> there is no evidence that anything would have changed. >> what the nra guy is arguing there, from t.o. a very good question from a host on fox news, is not that we should not put limits. because reloading magazines is no problem. it makes no difference if you have 10 round or 30 rounds becau

enforcement -- we don't have a lot of laws in place. i say all the time "it's not illegal to be mean to each other" and i tell that to adults and i can't tell you government officials "i have free speech. i can say what i want" and they have good arguments. i will give them that but you need to show them -- and law enforcement needs to show them it's not okay and we take it seriously and i do counseling for issues that originate at school and social media, whatever it is but as part the solution and we are standing up together and saying it's not okay. >> and holly this is no longer a local program, correct? >> it's amazing the response and law enforcement and everybody is looking for tools and answers to get some solutions and so we took it to washington dc earlier in the summer, so we have been working with maryland and virginia and all over california and hopefully washington soon and really excited to get everybody interested with the information. >> somebody asked how do you implement a restorative justice program? do you have that

i would certainly defer to law enforcement folks on that. and there is a press conference coming up shortly. >> in terms of -- >> right, and -- in terms of people in the region, police and law enforcement officials going door to door, looking for this individual. what can you tell us in terms of the process of police going to everyone's homes looking for this person? >> well, again, we put out, right at the beginning, to make sure that everyone would lock their doors and then we had s.w.a.t. teams and we're very thankful for all of the assistance that all the law enforcement agencies provided to the men and women of the watertown police department, which we're all very proud of. they would go to each one of the houses, hundreds of houses. >> bill? >> i'm sorry, mr. driscoll, i'm standing here in watertown and my question is, maybe this is -- comes back to the law enforcement officials themselves making this call, but is your sense that once they had completed the door to door, even if they have not found this 19-year-old suspect, will the lo

in your law practice,ing?practice, something, and so you come there with some experience that is shared with the man who's done the same thing, so i don't think you come in with some preset at -- attitude or experience something vastly different from that or the other stuff. i really don't. now, it could be at some stage of the proceeding that as a former wife and mother, i might look at some domestic relations case with somewhat different views than maybe a justice who was never been married or had children. that's possible, but i don't think by and large that you'd find many with totally different approaches. >> do you think cameras should be allowed in the court while cases are being argued? >> that question is posed about once a year to members of the supreme court, i guess largely by media people who accustomed to events, and so far, the supreme court has not permitted cameras to come into the supreme court chamber. it probably doesn't matter much as a practical matter because by nighttime, every day that

initially when alabama passed its immigration law, the immigration law was very tough. it was going to place a lot of requirements on law enforcement and a lot of things that we were going to have to do procedurally in order to enforce this law. ironically, most law enforcement officers disagreed with the legislature in the passage of this law. and the reason is we recognized that citizenship goes to the united states of america, not necessarily to the state of alabama. >> so christians feel we have a responsibility, and we certainly have demonstrated the neediest of the needy and alabama is a state with a lot of poverty and all, the neediest, those at the bottom, were the immigrants. had had eight or so con gre congratulations that we were versing, hispanic congregations. all of these were con gre congratulations were just devastated overnight. >> there are also many misconceptions about illegal immigrants. for instance, many believe illegals don't pay taxes. reap erican jobs, and american health benefits. >> i think a lot of people believe illegal immigrants because o

law enforcement going door-to-door. they are making sure that there are no other devices, not only looking for him, but they want to make sure that there are no other devices that are out there that could potentially injure anyone. this is really moving very, very quickly on many different levels. but once again, just to reiterate the older brother, he didn't drink, didn't smoke, said quote i don't have a single american friend, i don't understand them. he was a college student at bunker hill community college, with aspirations to be an engineer. that's what we know so far. jake, john? >> deb, that's some great reporting. just to recap what you said. the older brother, suspect that that's the one who has been killed. suspect number one with the black hat, went to bunker hill community college. he and his younger brother, who is suspect number two in the white hat, who is on the loose in watertown, or the surrounding area, those two and their families fled chechnya, then the family went to kazakhstan. and of course then

i'm worried we are under utilizesings our law library with staffing. happy to address those questions. first with respect to the partisanship with the mayor's office and a variety of others to explore opportunity with the - the director was involved with those discussions and other you institutions like other collaborations. it does not have any fruit >> with whom did you explore those locations. >> whether it was herrera or those discussions were had at the highest levels of the institutions involved. this was no not a location found by the city staff. it was a deal struck by the library and their brokers who presented it to the city for the city's approval and review as an adequate location it was outside the original search. that is admittedly far from the court location and served by transit and it's proximate in that respect but in response this is a law library location selection when i think helped foster a positive agreement as to location. and lastly menace the issue of providing services in different ways so the current footprint as suggested

scholars do not make laws. states make laws.o do in the vacuum in the vacuum what we were trying to do is create a tool that many of the folks could use use in their private practice. the problem was that the task was vast. the law of war and conflict, international humanitarian law. a number of other experts said we need to do more what states are interested in when they are victim of cyberattack. they're not interested on what can happen on the battle field. they are interested when ease estonia experienced in 2007. they are interested in situations which they are suffering massive cyberattacks. what can they do in response? we broadened to another area. the international law that governors the resort to force by states. when can state lawfully resort to face. we started off it and became apparent we were going to have to deal with a number of other related topics if we were going to understand the two body of law. so for example if you look at the manual today you'll find captions on sovereignty and just diction you'll find s

my skepticism about gun laws is criminals don't follow the law. they don't care what the law is, you can pass any -- >> senator, are you still there, senator? you know, criminals don't follow the laws on burglary and on murder and on auto theft. but those laws still-- >> and we prosecute them. >> schieffer: i think most people would say those law are fairly effective. let me ask you this questions. you have you have a concealed weapons permit, do you carry a weapon? >> i do not. but i have a concealed weapon permit, and i don't quite frankly because you spend most of my time in airports and the capitol where you're not necessarily allowed to carry them around. all the americans have a second-american right to buy a firearm to carry one for self-defense and sport. if someone has an effective way to protect that right and prevent criminals from getting access toes, with certainly i think everyone is open to that. >> schieffer: let me ask you quickly before you go about north korea, what-- shawe be doing there? are we following the right policieses?

against that serious international law and he said that that must stop. and it's the complete picture of what else president putin had to mention just log on to. you'll find the full transcript of his interview. on u.s. secretary of state john kerry is due in israel hoping to restart stalled peace talks between. this follows renewed turbulence between israel and palestine or the death of a former hamas member and it's already custody as. you have a high tensions in the middle east have spilled over into a full on propaganda war in america as the international community continue searching for the best path to a middle east peace agreement the issue has sparked a contentious war in new york are proposed to mean group recently unveiled an ad campaign that calls on the u.s. to stop sending three billion dollars in aid to israel every year the poster compares israel's policies to the south african apartheid and also includes a quote from doesn't who led the fight against the apartheid now this campaign is being sponsored by the american muslims for palestine n

but the third-party doctrine is so ensconsed in our framework of laws, in our privacy laws, that we already have a situation where electronic information, the government has to meet meet a higher standard. it made sense, though, for you to know that the government can send a subpoena to your bank and find out any financial transition you have ingauged in in the last years, but they can't -- if you aren't committing tax fraud, you probably aren't worried about that. but it may surprise you to know that that information is obtainable by a third party. let me get back to the pablet ability to -- the ability to investigate crimes. we commune cage indicate where we are and where we go and how we do it from the moment we leave our house to when we return home. i agree that the electronic information from our phones is more inadvicive and should be subject to a higher standard, they are still not cob content. content deserves the higher degree of protection. this is absolutely deserving of higher protection than the credit card transaction at starbucks this morning but it is not deserving of the s

we are saying it is your job to enforce the law, if is congress' job to enact the law and so presidentyou have overstepped your boundaries and we are hopeful that the judge will rule in our favor on this. it is extremely important to our country and our way of government that we get things back on track and put everyone back in their perspective places and let our law enforcement officers do their jobs. >> chris, can you tell me, there is it a difference between border patrol agent and an ice agent. 20 seconds or less. make sure we understand the difference between the two. >> border patrol agents stand on the border and keep people out of the country and protect us at the border. once they cross in the united states, they are the responsibility much ice agents. they work the interior enforcement and enforce immigration laws in 50 states and guam and puerto rico and quickly we do that with 5000 officers and agents nationwide and compare that to the los angeles police department with 10,000 officers and we are set up for failure from the beginning. >> you know, it is it a remarkable sto

our debra faric is getting more information from her law enforcement sources, federal law enforcement sources saying now they, the federal law enforcement agencies, have been placed on what's called level-one mobilization, this according to government sources. that's equivalent, according to these officials, all hands on deck. another senior federal official tells cnn that teams are on stand by to search flights leaving the united states. that the information coming in from debra faric. fran townsend, maybe you can explain what this means, federal law enforcement placed on level-one mobilization, equivalent of all hands on deck. what does that mean? >> basically, wolf, that means people who are in the office are no remain, they are going to work -- they are not going to go home, right? your shift is over, you're not going home. people who are at home, once they know they are on a level-one alert, there is a protocol for who comes back into the office and in what order so that they can work every available lead. it's not unusual, it's interesting, wolf, that they are talking about targ

this law could set off the other laws. left wing towns will out right ban guns. >> that would not be acceptable. >> how about in your left wing neighborhood with communist coffee shops? >> don't knock it until you have had the espresso. i recommend a side of marx. it is comi for foam. this a trend. i like to call it the in your face ordinance. it is like when a town like nelson or a state like mississippi enacts an anti- anti-bloomburg law to protect them from anybody infringing on their big gull be drinking. -- big gulp drinking. it is a chance for them to get out there and chest up against the people and a way that is far away from them. the subtext is look at as you. we are nelson and we exist. we are talking about them. we know this is a town. >> isn't that what bumper stickers are for? laws are laws and lessons are lessons. my dog maybe and my wife sometimes. >> my dog is my wife? >> my dog maybe, my gun never and my wife sometimes. i don't know. >> i have never seen that. >> you guys have to get out on the heartland.

so, law of the day always applies across the board and the projects need to pay the fees of the law of the day, correct? so i don't know if you have this answered today, can you tell me what happens to these when they come into the department. i'm assuming it's the same process for all fees and others maybe more familiar when they are dealing with this. >> my sense is the code is relatively clear on what point in the project implementation fees are due. typically they are either due at permit issuance or for certificate of occupancy but what that particular specified time place is, it appears in the code and applies to projects, again across the board as to the law of the day or the lack of this policy. >> so there would be no change in terms of how these are collected under the policy that is proposed here. >> okay. i may follow-up with you to understand the fee structure generally, not particular to this policy. >> commissioners? >> yes, mr. cider, just to understand something here. under the existing policy, once we issue let's say the approval in 3 years, it lapses and it effective

, teaches courses on criminal laws, criminal justice, law and consulted culture and law risk and studies. his book includes parole and the social control of the under class 1890-1990 how the war on crime transformed american democracy and created fear. welcome our panelist. [ applause ] >> i'm going to start with catherine mccrack in, the organization on juvenile and criminal justice has done extensive reach on the bail system and pretrial detention. is the system currently working would you say and what reforms would you support? >> thank you for having m

nobody needs to comply with this law.cheme, on a grander scale, there's going to be a problem with enforceability of any law mandating gun ownership because we all have an expectation and a constitutional right to privacy in our own homes. how are they going to enforce this? >> how would they? they say they don't even plan to really go door to door. judge hatchet, what about the other town that's been doing this for a long time? did it have an effect, the desired effect, crime's down? like having the adt sign in your window? >> i think it's all political posturing. i think it's craziness. how can -- i read the ordinance this morning actually. i figure thursday must be some fine print -- figured there must be some fine print i'm missing. there is nothing this allows them enforcement, and in fact the city council people are saying we don't even plan to enforce it. i think it's posturing. i don't see any value of this law at all. you can exempt out and all exceptions you talked about, and there are no penalties, very importa

it is not just about enforcing the laws that make it clear how the laws apply. it is, though, as we said, you can't get at this through enforcement alone. this is a culture that tolerates this and in too many ways promotes it. as tom mentioned we have an unprecedented partnership not just between our agencies but agencies across the federal government that the president has convened to bring our best resources and minds to bear to do something about it. there is now a web site, stopbullying.gov where a tool kit is being developed and these kinds of best practices are being promoted. the center for disease control, the division of violence prevention, an effort to use good data in research, they have released a come pend yum of common bullying tools. that's also available online. we are doing these conversations with community and the president has convened now two bullying summits where we bring the best practices to bear and learn locally. we've been doing webinar series across the country, you can find the dates for those on the web site. tom also mentioned ab

then international law. if no one's going to be held accountable well yes it well i think it would help the problem that you have with the international criminal court isn't a situation in of sadat conflict is if these if these dictators think that they're going to be thrown in. before the court and thrown in jail for the rest of their lives are going to fight more so there are downsides to the international court but i think there are also upsides but of course you know i mean here is what happened britain in the us invaded iraq and even killing rebels what we would call some terrorists that was unnecessary so anyone who died in that war. died unnecessarily because it was aggression right so bush and blair killed probably hundreds of thousands of people we don't know that they didn't bother to keep track of how many civilians were killed or rocky's were killed in that war and so you know you call it a war crime you call it aggression whatever you call it you know you have milosevic in the dock for. killing

the laws in this area are strict compliance laws, and they are very specific. the federal law since 1990 indicates issues from 1998. all businesses, such as a grocery store, a dentist's office, restaurants, a doctor's office, virtually anything that a member of the public comes into the -- comes into needs to be a barrier-free. we will go over what barriers are. every public accommodation needs to be wheelchair-accessible. there are also other other forf disability. most of the issues we are hearing about are wheelchair accessibility issues. there is a small group of private individuals who are wheelchair-down that go around the city and they look at small businesses. and i dare say anybody in small restaurants have some accessibility issues. it is another attempt at making your building wheelchair accessible. i am not sure which of you may be merchants and which it may be landlords. the law applies to both. and that means you were 100% liable for any barriers to access and any damages that may be associated with those barriers. there are ways you can defend yo

six states and those eight laws. that is all the president wants to talk about, he flies each one, seems. he went to denver yesterday heading out to hartford, connecticut, monday all the publicist comes with the presidential office is a skier in what is really happening in the country. more states have actually used gun regulations that have strengthened them. in fact 10 states, 10 states have passed 17 loss at ease the restrictions on guns including arkansas, kentucky, maine, mississippi, south dakota, tennessee, michigan, montana, utah and virginia. for example, arkansas eliminating a ban on carrying firearms, south dakota is now on the school boards for our teachers and tennessee passed a law allowing workers to bring the guns to work and store them in their car. i bet you did not hear about those lost in the national mainstream media. we may soon be able to add indiana to this list, lawmakers are deciding whether to make thursdathestate the first in tho require every school to have an armed employee. and indiana

to uphold the law?on of the united states and constitution of the united states. colorado law does not say i have to pull over everything in the wall. we set priorities. we have discretion in law enforcement. my discretion is not to enforce these laws that are going to make law abiding citizens criminals. >> gregg: best of luck to you. >> arthel: coming up the history the music, the hair, love it or hate it, the '80s were pretty iconic. the fall of the berlin wall. coming up next, inside look at matt's new mini series, the '80s decade that made us. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ using supercomputing and mobile technology over our secure network, verizon innovators are building a world of medical treatment data in the cloud. so doctors can make a more informed diagnosis from anywhere, in seconds rather than months. because the world's biggest challenges deserve even bigger solutions. powerful answers. verizon. [ chainsaw buzzing ] humans. sometimes, life trips us up. sometimes, we trip ourselves up. and a

we did a survey of all the international law, human rights law, there is no human rights law in the worldires a country to take people who are there illegally and make them into citizens. it's a policy decision, but again, as you said, very dangerous because it casts those of us who question this administration because of these statements any kind of change in the legal system and how to deal with the people here, it makes us all question we're going to be demonized in this process. we're the anti-civil rights people now? this is so unfortunate coming not just from a member of the president's cabinet, but by the attorney general of the united states. wrong by law and it's wrong to do in the country. >> monica: francisco, let me ask you about this because eric holder is the nation's chief law enforcement officer. he's supposed to be enforcing the laws as is the president of the united states. yet, to invoke civil rights, which is a very serious concept, in this kind of way seems incredibly rebless, irresponsible, destructive, and in the same way, it's cheapening the term, civil rights, bec

certainly that could be misleading if you think that means law school, law related jobs.issa: some form of employment after nine months that could be mcdonald's. working to pay for food. >> right, exactly. the devil will be in the details what specific wording did they use when they told perspective law students this? is there intentional fraud there or say it would lead to employment and people thought it meant law-related jobs? it could be unethical. that doesn't mean it is a fraud. that is based on intentionally misleading data. melissa: i'm not a lawyer. i'm doing my best to go through all the details. i understand in the past these types of cases were more successful when you're talking about vocational school, technical school like culinary school. >> right. melissa: is it different when it comes to law schools? >> know, part of it is people going to the law school, what information they have and with a law school versus a trade school more of a feeling people know about the market. people can look into different details what will happen after graduation. melissa: w

and by law they have to keep the record. and by law, they cannot use that as a registration. cannot by law, even in our bill we even make sure that you cannot use any type of information for registration. and we said if you try to do it, if your government agency or a person that works for a government and you use any of these records, it's a felony with 15 years of imprisonment. that's how much this bill protects my rights as a law-abiding gun owner. we think it's reasonable to provide mandatory instant criminal background checks for every gun sold at a gun show. we've talked about this before. the law today says that if i go to a gun show and i go and there's a dealer, a licensed dealer, that dealer still has to do a background check on me and keep the proper report. but i could go to a table over or go outside in the parking lot, and nothing is required of me. nothing. and all we're doing is taking current law and making it uniform so everybody plays by the same set of rules. we think it helps tremendously. we talk about the criminals and people who have been adjudicated t

they were exempted from civil rights law. rights law.t know what he' suddenly, she does something unexpected and you see the woman you fell in love with. she's everything to you. but your erectile dysfunction - that could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sexual activity. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or if you

law enforcement in the u.s.r than pakistan. >> i was talking to the fbi agent who started boston's first join the terrorism task force. among the things he was amazed to really talk about is that back in the '80s and '90s, you simply didn't have everyone walking around with a miniaturized and exceptionally powerful surveillance tool that could then be called upon to turn a fleeting moment of existence and a memory that might fade into data that can be harvested and analyzed. that was quite an amazing thing from his perspective about u ultimately knowing what that gets you. >> the existence of that data, the existence of the data in the public sphere, the data being sent to police and the way in which the kind of crowd sourcing amateur investigation was intersecting with, sometimes derailing the official investigation, the way that things that were spotted on an internet thread would end up in an official's e-mail which would then end up back reported out. >> we have lessons about how this might look going forwar

your take on this i have friends who are law enforcement officers who generally are rather concerned. that there are weapons of war on our streets. the biggest concern isn't the weapon itself as much as having the wrong person in possession of firearms and for us it's not about gun control it is about the crime control it's about reducing crime to reducing violence on our streets and the argument before this congress right now in the senate will close loopholes that are resulting in the list death of americans it has nothing to do with limiting the rights over law abiding americans of sound mind it's all about keeping guns out of the hands of criminals ninety percent of americans support universal background checks so a four percent of n.r.a. members and more in our members supported it is something that there is no excuse to passion and thank thank thank you john mccain and the others are coming out saying we need to vote on it the american people has spoken and it's time for the senate to act on behalf of the will of the people of this nation but it is almost a certain. lot of the

did i want to go to seminary or law school? for family reasons my husband wanted to relocate roundup them on school rather than seminary and was delighted and then i go to divinity school at yale and thought i was trading off one interest against the other and discovered with the interdisciplinary training i could combine my interest so i started around 1982 i am in my 30th year working in this field and find myself still fascinated and intrigue dedicated to sinking deeply about the relationship between law and religion. >>host: where is this pitcher from? >> outside the united states supreme court. it was taken on the day that a challenge to the pledge of allegiance, not the requirement to say it that the insertion of the words under guide that have been in 1950's with the cold war pushed back against communism and this is a bishop of the small the nomination from poughkeepsie new york. they are praying for their protection or public acknowledgement of god outside the supreme court on the day the case was argued and behind her

law enforcement sources. john is here, julia is here, our law enforcement analyst. and, john, i want you to recap for our viewers exactly what we know. we're awaiting a news conference we believe will happen around 5:00 p.m. eastern with the fbi, local police, the governor, the mayor and others. they'll tell us what they can at that time. in the meantime, your breaking news. >> i was told by one source this morning a boston law enforcement source that they believe they had a breakthrough of significant progress in the investigation. this source declined to be much more specific just said as the analysis continued, and we know the analysis was centered on video analysis, all the camera stuff turned in by local television stations, individuals, video and still photos. i was told there was a much better mood this morning and what they believe to be significant progress in the investigation, a turning point. that's how a boston law enforcement source described it to me. i spoke to a second source briefed on and based on my ranks with that source, i can't identify that s

she claims the camps indefinite detention of prisoners without charge or trial violates international law more of these developments later in the show i. suppose monday april eighth four pm in washington d.c. i'm margaret how well you're watching our t.v. and starting this hour the latest from wiki leaks earlier today the whistle blowing web site released one point seven million diplomatic cables ranging from nine hundred seventy three to nine hundred seventy six and these cables reflect the united states department interaction with other countries and these cables shed some light on the u.s. political goals of that time now this country of documents also includes communications between the top official of the time henry kissinger and other governments wiki leaks founder julian assange was on hand somewhat joining the proceedings remotely from inside the ecuadorian embassy. famously said that he who controls the president controls cost and he controls the post controls the future and that is because of the vital role that history plays in deciding our interpretation of what is happening i

that law has been adjoined since 2001, and we do not have a court date for that law at this time.es, the legislation with our governor brownback in the governor's mansion, i am positive they will try to pass more rules, laws to drive us out of business. >> michael: you have been getting a lot of pushback from people like troy newman. he said quote . . . what have they been doing? >> well, they have filed complaints -- well, when we were under construction with the city inspector's office here in wichita. so we had multiple visits by city inspectors. we have had our final signoff for the clinic. so they tried to stop us there. they were unable to. they also filed some complains with the board of healing arts. we have answered those complaints. so that is another obstacle that they seek to put in our way. frankly what they do is bury us in legal fees paperwork, and harass us out of business but -- but that certainly will not happen. >> and julie in thinking about what he said you are not opening a clinic like this because of economic feasibility. this is not about money at all, and