♪ ♪ don't let me die girl don't let me die girl don't let me die don't let me go ♪ ♪ don't let me die't let me die baby ♪ [ cheers and applause ] >> jay: bobby brown! nice job, man. >> how you doing, brother? >> jay: nice job. nice job. i want to thank my guests -- joel mchale, jarod miller. of course, bobby brown. tomorrow night, hugh laurie will be here. but jimmy fallon's happening right now. jimmy, take it. [ cheers and applause ] ♪ >> from studio 6b in rockefeller center, the national broadcasting company presents -- tonight's guests are -- and featuring the legendary roots crew. and here he is -- jimmy fallon! [ cheers and applause ] captions paid for by nbc-universal television -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com ♪ [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: ah, thank you, thank you very much. i feel the love! thank you so much. welcome to "late night with jimmy fallon," everybody. we have fun tonight. [ cheers ] hey, here's some 2012 election news. a new poll found that mitt romney is actually ahead of president obama among female voters. which explains obama's new slogan, "i'm barack

♪ don't let me die got nothing left ♪ ♪ don't let me die girl don't let me die girl don't let me die m holding on to these memories that's the only way that i'll survive ♪ ♪ my biggest fear got the best of me yeah ♪ ♪ 'cause i should have put down my pride oh oh oh oh ♪ ♪ oh oh oh oh oh oh ooh baby oh oh oh ♪ ♪ feels like i'm holding my breath don't let me die girl ♪ ♪ can't keep holding my breath don't let me die baby baby don't let me ♪ ♪ don't let me die girl don't let me die girl don't let me die ♪ ♪ don't let me die girl don't let me die girl don't let me die baby baby don't let me ♪ ♪ don't let me die girl don't let me die girl don't let me die whoo ♪ ♪ don't let me die girl don't let me die girl don't let me die don't let me go ♪ ♪ don't let me die girl don't let me die girl don't let me die don't let me die baby ♪ [ cheers and applause ] >> jay: bobby brown! nice job, man. >> how you doing, brother? >> jay: nice job. nice job. i want to thank my guests -- joel mchale, jarod miller. of course, bobby brown. tomorrow night, hugh laurie will be here. but jimmy fallon's happening r

let me go don't let me die girl don't let me die girl don't let me die ♪ ♪ don't let me die girl don'tt me die girl ♪ ♪ don't let me die girl don't let me die ♪ >> don't let me die ♪ baby. >> bobby brown. thank you. we will have one more song from bobby a little bit later. but first, your local news. >> live, local, latebreaking. this is wbal-tv 11 news in baltimore. >> good morning. i am lisa robinson. one man is dead while the woman recovers from her head injuries after her boyfriend reportedly attacked her and then held her captive in a northeast baltimore home. that happened sunday afternoon at fenwick ave. after a standoff, the suspect reportedly shot himself. police say he >> hot and humid weather to the holiday weekend and a possibility for shower or thunderstorm hit 80's for the next couple of days. >> we are back her

i'm so glad when they let me out of this lockup. give him the best life he can imagine. >> you don't want to be interviewed? >>> coming up -- marcus pleads with the warden to be let out of ad seg. >> why should i put you out in pop? >> please, i learned my lesson. >> i ain't convinced right now. h on our retirement savings, especially in this economy. but with three kids, being home more really helped. man: so we went to fidelity. we talked about where we were and what we could do. we changed our plan and did something about our economy. now we know where to go for help if things change again. call or come in today to take control of your personal economy. get free one-on-one help from america's retirement leader. i think we should see other people. in fact, i'm already seeing your best friend, justin. ♪ i would've appreciated a proactive update on the status of our relationship. who do you think i am, tim? quicken loans? at quicken loans, we provide you with proactive updates on the status of your home loan. and our innovative onli

governor dean, let me quote you something from peggy noonan. she wrote in the "wall street journal--" and i'm quoting now-- she's talking about the president. she said the president has not only has nothing to say. he's actually become boring. how as a democrat would you respond to that? >> i think that's just silly. the fact of the matter is the united states is much better positioned in terms of our foreign security than we have been in a long time. osama bin laden is dead. we have our troops out of iraq. our troops are coming out of afghanistan. these are things that are important to the united states. secondly, there have been four million new jobs added since barack obama took over the presidency. now there's been some loss in the public sector, so the tea party people ought to be happy. in fact, government is shrinking. i think we've made some real progress. we have two thoughtful, sensible justices on the supreme court, no more right wing extreme people. we have a medical system, while more complex than i think would have been desirable,

let me go back end up in let me go over to london let me go back to one here well what is the risk factor of making a mistake miscalculation here because you keep reading for months on end now you know what's the window of opportunity to attack iran i mean it's all over the place ok what is the level of miscalculation here when we were moving away from these talks in baghdad. no i just i described just a couple of points of want to show them so there is the there is a debate over the whole issue of resupply and i think both sides haven't really create what that means and i think iran has one basically conception of what theresa prosody is and obviously the p five plus one particular united states has another idea of what resources there as far as i can see cathy ashton has sort of gone leaps and bounds to actually accommodate the iranians i saw like just in recent baggage she was all but wearing a basically a montoya like a long coat so there will be no offense to islamic sensibilities and as far as i know from what i hear from european devices or they are being extremely extremely

let me just make--let me just make two further points. he says this is an issue of judgment about what steps to take. let us examine briefly what the deputy leader of the labour party's judgment was. she was asked very specifically, you call for the secretary of state's resignation. within 23 minutes of the evidence being provided to the leveson inquiry. she was asked, did you read that evidence? she said no, i didn't need to. why didn't you need to she was asked? because i heard the evidence of james murdoch. that's it. he is not the arbitor of standards in the ministerial code. it is a serious issue, but it is not as serious as the jobs, the debt that we have to deal with. it is time that we focused on that. let me say this to the right honorable gentlemen endlessly questioning the integrity of someone when you don't have the evidence is bad judgment, rotten politics, and plain wrong. we have learned something about the labor leaders today, and i think it's something that we'll hughes " --ghes " order. order, order. i hope the prime mini

let me start off and let's do this informally. let me start off with an ethical question. and i noticed, doctor, you deal with ethics. i think the average american would be extremely upset to know that people are dying not because we don't know how to treat those people -- that's one sad aspect of life -- but that they can't afford what is, in fact, a minimal cost in terms of the real production of the product to save their lives. riots like somebody over there dying and nobody is going out and reaching them a hand and bringing their in. what are the ethical implications of that? >> of course, i agree that there's a significant ethical question raised by the problem you described as somebody not stepping forth and saving a drowning child. but i think this problem is actually worse because, as jamie was just emphasizing, the government is intervening in this market already. it's intervention is in the form of an exclusive right called a patent. the consequence of that intervention is to produce a market where only a tiny slice of those who are affected by the disease can ac

she said, well, let me tell you, when she was mad, she'd call me edward. when she wasn't mad, it was babe. so i knew she was in a good mood because she called me babe. so she said, babe, let me tell you something. your father wasn't in the first world war, but let me tellou, that son of a bitch is gassed. i said, well, i didn know. and not knowing, i'm 9 years old. i said did he work for the gas company? "you're like your father." i'm like, well, the one day -- this is true, what i'm tlling you. my father was out at the republican club all night. he come home about 4:00 ie morning. and we had all just come back from mass. i was sitting at the breakfast table, and we're almost finished, and my dad come downstairs, and my mother's in the kitchen. and he said, ann. myother said, yeah, joe. this fish is cold. he always ate sea bass in the morning. this fis is cold so my youngest brother said to him, dad, you were out at the cl till 3:00 or 4:00 this morning. we heard you come in. my mother didn't say nothing. he said, ann. she said joe, i'lle right in. and she

let me simplify them. one is instead of building your own data center which companies would do 10 years ago and build your own computer room at generators and air conditioning, you use an outsourced professional data center. that is one move to the court, which is one move to the crowd. the second model, which you have actually used to set up a mass of private club, where you can now provision servers on demand for your constituents within the city. in the context of a government with the compliance issues and security issues and mission critical services which you overlay, that is quite an achievement. so that is the second model which you have embarked on. the third model is clearly the public crown. he made a decision to move some of your data to a public cloud -- e-mail. if you talk about the decision process which led to selecting each of them, your concerns, your challenges, and the economics behind each of those models, i think it would be very beneficial. >> a cake, well, our decision to leverage s

it's just, you know, let me rephrase it, bill. people would perceive you as coming from a law and order perspective. robin, they look at you as coming it from the faith and the human rights perspective. here you are, two people, that, you know, with that different viewpoint wind up at a very similar place. given that -- i don't know if you guys ever met before or had ever heard each other's views before. it's one of the things i kind of hope, because when i decided to bring you to the panel, i was hoping i was going to get this kind of different perspective at winding up the at the same place. does hearing each other's perspectives encourage you or give you a little -- maybe for lack of a better word hope that there are practical solutions that people on both sides of the political spectrum could bring together and solve this rather than just having this persistent, continuing argument are you for or against sb1070? is securing the border -- must we secure the border first? >> i think that by having this conversation in this forum

let me tell you why i'm bringing this up, chip. because i think it speaks it a wider strategy of trying to make the president unamerican, maybe wasn't born here. i think this leads it this whole subliminal message that the republicans are trying to sell, that there is something unamerican about this president. and i'll tell you why, because when you you had people this your own primary, saying the same things about romney, vulture capitalists and all, no one said they were anti-capitalist or anti-free enterprise. why does the president have to be anti-free enterprise, anti-free capitalism. you didn't see that about grinning rich or huntsman or about mr. romney -- yes, mr. romney liking it fire people. there is a subliminal message here, are we really trying to sell the american people. >> i certainly hope not. i disagree with president obama a lot. but i do think he is an american and i disagree with the path he is trying to take. i think he is a person that believes more in government than the private sector. i couldn't disagree w

let me go back to the original point, mark, when you talk about when he said that mr. gingrich should just embrace mr. romney, eventually he will have to get there. when he does, he will have a problem cause of all of the things he said through the primary. let me remind you and our viewers about what he will have to overcome before he does that embrace out of his own mouth. >> the romney machine can drive downturnout, run over opponents with negative adds, it doesn't seem capable of inspiring positive turnout, and the result is worrisome if you're thinking about the fall campaign. >> is he still the most anti-immigrant candidate? >> i think of the four of us, yes. >> are you calling mitt romney a liar? >> yes. >> this is an ad released by the obama campaign. so clearly the obama campaign is going to use this, and clearly as newt tries to do his moonwalk toward embracing romney, he will be facing the fact that the public and the voter wills be reminded by his own words and tape of what he said about willard mitt romney. >> that's right, and team obama will be reminding

let me characterize those views for you. on the one side, we have a very vocal, organized, well funded advocates who insist that drug legalization is a silver bullet for addressing our nation's drug problems. on the other side of the debate are those who insist that a law enforcement war on drugs approach the one that was just mentioned is the way to create a drug-free society. you know, if only we could spend more money on prisons and enforcement and increase arrests and seizures of drugs that logic goes, the drug problem would at some point just go away. the obama administration strongly believes that neither of these approaches is human, they're not compassionate, not realistic, probably most importantly they are not grounded in science. the approach is also do not acknowledge the complexity of our nation's drug problem will reflect what science has shown us over the past two decades. whenever you can put the answer on a complex problem on a bumper sticker, you know you probably don't have much of and answer. that's why t

let me shut this off. nope. it's my wife. she'll have to wait. it seems to me after 3 1/2 years it would seem he could at least recommend somebody so the vet progress says could start. but to wait for 3 1/2 years, and to know the costs that were involved and an awful lot of people said there's ban lot of waste, fraud, and abuse in iraq and afghanistan. it just seems they would have had somebody all over that instead of asking for money and spending the money without proper oversight. go ahead. >> i think we can all agree that acting i.g.s do a very, very good job, these positions should be filled as speedily as possible. i think that absolutely goes without saying. >> if you were talking to the president, i always frame my comments on the floor like this, because we can't talk to the president, but if i were talking to the president, you would say you ought to listen to mrs. fong, because this should be done and should be done very quickly. mr. miller, anybody else have any comments? listen, i'm awfully glad you folks got to see me. it's been a bi

let me go to evan.here are three ways to do this, the states could rule it's a right, the supreme court could make the decision, or voters could make the decision. what do you think should be done, evan? >> well, ted is exactly right, that the constitution affords every american the freedom to marry, and that's the same freedom gay people are invoking, the same as marriage in the past invoked it. but the president is right, that the way we get through is through a patchwork of struggles. some states get there faster, other states fight it, they debate, and it takes the court to encourage it. >> what do you think it will take for this country to vote on equality? >> if we do our work in the next 10 to 20 to 50 years ago. ted, who spoke passionately as a president and an american, and thanks to president obama. >> let me ask you about the politics of this. if this becomes a partisan, romney voted against it. if this goes into the ballot box in november, will that advance the cause of state-by-state action

not even his laugh is real. >> let me confess, i was walking into the studio so i didn't see it. >> leta personal powell. do you think this guy is a visceral personal powell? >> i think romney is a genuine person but he doesn't connect with people like bill clinton, he doesn't connect with people like ronald reagan. >> or you. >> he doesn't have those candidate skills. but he is a very capable guy who is for the right things, and we talk about $2 trillion sitting on the sideline and obama can't do anything about it because of this congress. well, the $2 trillion is sitting on the sidelines because of the democrat can congress he controlled when he wanted to give them the highest tax increase in the country fell primarily on employers. it was a plan where you put every budget he proposed -- >> bush is living under a tax program right now. george w. bush's tax regime is what we're under right now. all the tax cuts that bush wanted are still in place. we're living in a world designed fiscally by george w. bush and obama hasn't been able to change it an inch. >> just a quick point. obama ge

let me play a little bit of what mr. romney had to say and we'll talk about this stunt. >> this building, this half a billion dollar taxpayer investment represents a serious conflict of interest on the part of the president and his team. it is also a symbol of how the president thinks about free enterprise. free enterprise to the president means taking money from the taxpayers and giving it freely to his friends. >> there you have it. romney at solyndra. david axelrod and supporters of the president in massachusetts trying to focus on his record. what do we make of this? >> let me talk about solyndra first. this is the lowest, cheapest blow. solyndra and the failed loan that it represents is 1% of the energy department's loan portfolio. a lot of people would argue we need more support for alternative energy. one of the reasons it went under is because the chinese own the manufacturing sector because they give it a lot of support. >> republicans seem to believe, and oxley because romney is there, they believe there's some

mitt romney says things are bad, you're in charge, and you are to blame for the badness. >> let me askother question. just interesting to me. whenever you talk to people, they say watch what happens overseas. we now have this election going on in france. it looks as though the socialist who has promised a 75% rate on anyone making -- tax rate on anyone making $1.3 million or over, and they say the marginal rate is actually closer to 90% and who wants to put back in place the cuts in government service. if that should happen and if he should win, what does that do, if anything, to the u.s. economy? >> well, first place you have two elections. you have another one in greece next week, and it seems likely that both of them are a referendum on austerity, on the bad things that have been imposed, on the economies of both countries, but especially greece, in getting out of this dilemma, and the voters are not happy with having austerity. economists shouldn't be happy with it either, and it ought to be a lesson for us. if you cut spending drastically, it's not going to be good for your econom

me? okay, good. now -- let's cut. i need you to be -- talk to me. talk to me; listen to me. the top. even higher. talk to me; talk to me. then "okay, listen to me" would be the same -- probably inflection, the same energy. and then, in fact, yeah, yeah, yeah. "yes, let me remind you of the upside here." you know it's funny. i won't even look at you until then; okay? let's do it one more time. scene 7, shot 7, take 5. action. they didn't say anything to you? no. howard. howard, talk to me. talk to me! you talk to me! okay. you listen to me. now let me remind you of the upside here. you put in a million dollars, a year and a half, two years, three years at the outside -- you're looking at taking out four million dollars! lenny, i know the math. good! i just want to rethink things. howard, howard, howard. howard, listen to me. we have been working on this deal for a year. you knew every single inch of this property. you knew every page in the design. you know all the numbers. what could possibly go wrong? you're worried about putting your mother in a nursing home. you got to fi

it's very simple. >> well, let me give you the last word, chad. >> let me just say that what president obama did today is consistent with where the majority of american people are. >> no, it's not. >> we're a growing number of democrats and republicans from dick cheney to ted olson to laura bush. it is consistent. it's where the country is headed and i expect in not the too distant future, people like the activists here against me today will soon regret these words. i believe too will evolve to the side, the most american of all views, and that is equality and freedom. president obama put us one step closer to that today. >> chad griffin, bill donahue, thank you both very much. >> thank you. >>> just yesterday clay aiken said he wished president obama would, quote, hurry up and evolve faster. clay, you must be pretty happy that he reacted so quickly? >> i am. i feel so empowered. >> i mean a big day for every -- you know, every gay american. a big day for every american in many ways, whatever reaction you had to it. how did you feel when you heard the news? >> you know, it is a little

so let me go back to reality. >> let's go back to auschwitz. >> you asked me whether i can tell what it was like in auschwitz. >> can you convey it? >> number one, how much time have i got? >> we're going to keep it short. so you have to do the condensed auschwitz version which isn't easy i know. >> the reason i'm asking, it's very difficult or practically impossible to tell you in the few minutes what auschwitz was like. let me just say in general, i don't know how many you people saw movies about the holocaust, how many books you were reading, what you know about the holocaust and what you know about auschwitz. in general, the former chancellor of germany, hell amount cole on the 50th an verse i have of the liberation of auschwitz says auschwitz is the darkest chapter in german history. even for me, for one that was living in auschwitz, living in auschwitz, existing in aush witsz, it's impossible to describe even if you'll give me the rest of the evening of what a death camp -- you must remember auschwitz was not only a concentration camp. it was a death camp. auschwitz was one of

let me just suggest i'm also an accountant so ok interest is in helping governments be wiser managers what i call a well being balance sheet right now we are operating the economies without a balance sheet we use an income statement called the g.d.p. but really there's no kind of accounting for the assets the human the social and natural capital that actually underpin wellbeing so that's what i'm arguing for and working with governments particularly local governments and showing how the chief financial officer can start to look at investment in wellbeing assets we know that we know the detractors to well being we know the things that create better conditions for all being so let us invest in the asset classes that actually give the best opportunity for wellbeing and the fair distribution of wellbeing across the community the idea of you know the issue of subjective happiness and my perception of happiness which changes day to day. you know i'm not i'm not totally convinced that particular relevance to policymakers i mean it's interesting to maybe have the conversation cross your cross

allusion to that is why they are rational decision to let me let me finish this particular point which is important nobody's saying that they want to move away from the welfare state but the one for state of the existing greece is not effective that's why there is real poverty in greece so i took my argument is basically people do change and that's expected what graeme jumping graeme jump in i was going to say this is one of the contradictions you have people in greece saying according to the opinion polls sixty percent of them saying they want to stay in the euro but at the same time sixty percent of them vote for parties which are policies that will make it impossible for them. to stay in the euro and and when you when other europeans look at the greece the view that's taken is well look you know we've either had to go through some very difficult years of getting the public finances back on track or we're having to do it no why shouldn't the greeks have to do it too you know the greek government must start to learn to collect its taxes the greek government must start to look at how m

let me show you this. some of these officers are still going on as we speak let me also show you some video if we have time. earlier, these are arrests that were made in total, nine people have been are arrested. all and all in different parts of town. you can see that and these portions of this video. back out here, live you can see these officers. some of these. even hundreds and peace plaza. keeping a close eye on this and keeping you updated. in this- plaza outside of this in city hall. the banf >>pamm: some of these protesters to be taken into custody >>reporter: this was taken into custody and just in a few moments ago. frankland and turk was open but now it looks like these items have been thrown from the roof. now, police have shut down this intersection. they have asked us to move out of the way. barricades outside the building but it seems like these police officers have also taken this away. these officers have requested that we cannot stand here. the protesters are here. it appears that there i

let me give you an example. if i put numbers in like this, 87% the speed of light, i put in there 0.87c and do that, it turns out my time will be twice. i'll observe things take twice as long a time, okay? now let's suppose, i travel relative to you guys at 87% the speed of light. and if you guys watch my watch undergo its second-hand thing, you guys will see my watch taking twice as long to make one complete turn. you hear what i'm saying? you'll see it stretched out by 2. now travel with me. and we'll watch. now we're going at 87% the speed of light, you and i together. you look at my watch. you see any funny business? what's v? - zero - zero. because the observed, the watch. the observer, there is no relative speed between the observer and the observed. get it? so you in the rocket ship notice nothing unusual if you travel along with the watch. then v is zero in this equation. and if v is zero, then this term is zero. what's 1 take away zero? 1. what's the square root of 1? 1. and how do your times compare? t

we, from the ig -- >> let me just interrupt real quickly. the president has had three years to make a recommendation, over three years, almost four. and it just seems to me that even with -- it must be the president call ing me right now. let me shut this off. nope, it's my wife. she'll have to wait. it just seems to me after 3 1/2 years, it would seem to me that he could have at least recommended somebody so that the vetting process could start, but to wait for 3 1/2 years and to know the costs that were involved and an awful lot of people said there's been a lot of waste, fraud and abuse in iraq and afghanistan and it just seems they would have had somebody all over that, instead of asking for money and spending the money without proper oversight. go ahead. >> i think we can all agree that while acting igs do a very, very good job. these positions should be filled as speededly as possible. i think that absolutely goes without saying. >> if i were talking to the president, i always frame my comments on the floor like this because we can't ta

steve, let me start with you. every primary battle is bruising, but this one seems especially brutal. does anyone believe these endorse wants are heart felt? >> no, i think you have two things going on. one is what romney represents to the conservative base is a guy that they suspect is secretly not one of them. they have not really believed he is a conservative. that is reflected in a lot of an mosty. there is something else too. we saw this in 2008 and this time too. he rubs the people that run against him the wrong way personally. whether it was mccain, juliaou . getting away with more than he should. it rubs them wrong. >> when you look at the surrogates, those speaking on his behalf, they don't seem completely on board, listen to this. >> i think a lot of people, senator rob portman would be phenomenal for vice president. >> this reminds me of going to a surgeon, right, if i have a terrible cancer operated on, i didn't go to the nicest doctor, i went to the best doctor. >> we need an alternative voice out the

let me ask you this. when we spoke yesterday, as i heard his story i asked him, how did you survive death row? the mechanics of this. i asked about how much time in the yard that he got. i wonder if you could share with members of -- in the auditorium where your daily life was like on death row. >> i cannot handle i was watching. this was death row in louisiana. you have three televisions on the wall, you were in your cell 23 hours per day, you get out for the shower or exercise, -- >> let me interrupt you to make this clear. you are completely alone, and the televisions are outside of the cell, or multiple inmates can be watching them? and they all may be on different channels? and you have to hear this even if you are not watching television? >> this is crazy. you have sought -- you have for televisions and four different channels, 15 people tried to talk at the same time. i was there was a mentally disturbed people and they actually had to have shot to calm them down, whatever kinds of drugs that they

let me, general, let me go to you. you know where i am going. i want to talk to you about the air force base. as the you know, there is an effort to relocate that. we have had conversation. and my big concern is based on the volume of movement of civilian force. these are my word. i see this as kind of a back door brac, without all the public process and the need. here is the real question. what i ask every one, every meeting i have. if you are the air force and wearing anything that indicates such you get these questions and i look for the answers. did the air force conduct a comprehensive analysis and assessment tole v lle validate cost savings. five years it is $169 million. when i say comprehensive, not just for the fiscal year '13. but for the spread. and then other services that may be affected? example a is joint training. and mobility center that the army uses to move people, the striker force. they use it. it is on air force base. air force base personnel participate in that effort. when you reduce down the force. the army is going to h

let me get back to robert reich and this question of populism.ou're a populist, i know you believe in it, and i just wonder why we're seeing this fight. it looked to me like a couple things happened last sunday. cory booker obviously wanted to differentiate himself from the president. he did so effectively. but he did so by undermining the president's main campaign argument. i want to ask you if you think it's a smart argument on the democratic side, that fairness cuts with voters? >> i think it does. again, chris, if it is linked up with growth, as it must be. because the only reason and the only way we can get growth back in this country is if we have a fair distribution of income and wealth in this country. and most people looking at the why we have such a sluggish recovery now understand the problem is on the demand side. it's not the supply side. it's not because of corporations don't have tax cuts and it's not because the wealthy don't have the tax cuts. it's because the middle class doesn't have the income they need to provide adequate dem

let me put it this way. what is in a fair question mark to ask mitt romney regarding his history at bain? >> well, they're saying a lot more than it was just an attack on the jobs that he created. they're taking specific deals and pointing them out and saying these deals didn't work and therefore people will make the assumption that there is a broader attack. i'm saying strategically, i think they're walking a very fine line. i think a lot of centrist democrats will say wait a minute. you're talking about it is not just the jobs they did or didn't create. >> i want to play a little clip from morning joe to lighten the mood a little bit. they actually brought in a little fun at cory booker's expense referring to the second video as a hostage video saying they needed proof of life. >> that is a hostage video. >> that is the definition of a hostage video. >> does the fbi field office know that they've got those guys loose in newark? >> there you have it. cory booker's video -- they even chopped off the top. he

let me get your take on the jobs act. let see if you have any regrets. >> give him a couple of years. >> i have some regret. that is absolutely not one of the regrets i've had in my term in congress. when you mention members of congress who are shirking their responsibility with regard to reform, i assume you're talking about the senate who basically has not had a meeting over there in the last 14 months to deal with any of the forms that both sides of the aisle says we should be doing -- >> no, i'm talking about the house. >> i'm mistook that. they cut their budget by 30% -- >> that's not quite the way. there's -- a way things could have been different is if there was some degree of certainty in the marketplace today. we came to the edge of the cliff i was going to say, he was one of the leaders, even though it was our own party, he was one of the leaders that led to the uncertainty in the first place. why did we have the situation back then? it's because wall street, the businesses across the country just up to '08 sayin

let me give you an example. if i put numbers in like this, 87% the speed of light, i put in there 0.87c and do that, it turns out my time will be twice. i'll observe things take twice as long a time, okay? now let's suppose, i travel relative to you guys at 87% the speed of light. and if you guys watch my watch undergo its second-hand thing, you guys will see my watch taking twice as long to make one complete turn. you hear what i'm saying? you'll see it stretched out by 2. now travel with me. and we'll watch. now we're going at 87% the speed of light, you and i together. you look at my watch. you see any funny business? what's v? - zero - zero. because the observed, the watch. the observer, there is no relative speed between the observer and the observed. get it? so you in the rocket ship notice nothing unusual if you travel along with the watch. then v is zero in this equation. and if v is zero, then this term is zero. what's 1 take away zero? 1. what's the square root of 1? 1. and how do your times compare? t

but bill clinton, let me show you this. le perfectly willing to let his wife run, although he thinks she's sincere. let me show you what he said. >> and i believe that she's being absolutely honest with you when she says she doesn't think she'll go back into politics. whether she does or not, who knows what will happen. if she comes home and we do this foundation stuff the rest of our lives, i'll be happy. he changes her mind and decides to run, i'll be happy. >> so she is sincere. i think that she means it. come home and rest and we'll talk about it, hillary. that's how i read that one. what do you think, david? >> well, i think four years is a long time. hillary clinton is not likely to serve in a second obama administration. so either way, whether romney is elected or obama is re-elected she'll have a good four years off to miss politics. her stature has only increased during these past few years. she's much more popular across the board now than when she first ran for president. so for her, i think it's a real possibilit

let me do one more thing. one more thing, throw it to chris matthews, "hardball" is up right now. >>> not enough jobs, let's play "hardball." >>> good evening, i'm chris matthews in washington leading off tont. the economy added 115,000 jobs last month while the unemployment rate did drop to 8.1%. republicans couldn't wait to cheer the bad news. but the "new york times" columnist and nobel-prize winning economist paul krugman argues that things would be better if the republicans get out of the way. he joins us at the top of the show. also dirty angry money. montana's governor doesn't like much this pac money and politics that is, he's helping to start a prairie fire out west to ban corporate money from politics. the governor joins us here. >>> plus, why do gay republicans want to be in a political party that won't defend them? isn't that a fundamental question? if people don't like you, why are you there? we're going to ask former congressman mark foley. >>> and the secret service agent that protected jacquelin

let me, let me. forgive me, sir. let me bring in congressman ryan. >> guest: chris, the promise to cut the definite in half over the first term is a big promise break he made. the congressional office looked at the president's budget and it has 40 billion of actual reductions in the president's budget . that is according to cbo. and only to be outdone by tax increases for four billion and doesn't come close to if i caning our problem. and more to the point, chris. the president had four years to deal with this . four trillion deficits and four times did nothing about the debt crisis to get debt under control. he did disavow bowles-simpson. the reason i didn't vote for it was health care reform. and i put out a plan. here's what i would do to fix the crisis. the president is yet to propose. the senate hasn't voted three years on anything. >> guest: that is factually not the case. >> guest: according to the cbo. >> guest: to the congressional bottoming website to look at it for themselves. b, the fundmental choice here

. >> bob, let me start with you. you know john edwards well, what a day. >> i don't know him well for the last eight years and i decided not to work with him for president in 2003 because i thought he wasn't ready, but when i met him in '98, i thought he had enormous potential. there is another verdict that's been rendered here. the self-inflicting downfall is a tragedy. he will never dream again, maybe he is, about being on that mountain top that he almost reached. if he dreams about that, it's a foolish and false dream. he said god is not finished with him yet, but the voters are. >> david, do you think the jurors were the last people to vote in favor of him? >> it might have been the last elect electorate he got on his side. he is 58 years old. which doesn't seem that old, he has a lot of intelligence, america is a place of second, third, and fourth acts, but it's incredibly hard to see how he gets to any place from outside of this valley that bob accurately describes. somebody asked me to give an evaluation of wh

let me try to get further in that. because some of the argument from senator toomey and others, a notion that somehow this is going to interfere with the freedom to create new apps and so on and so forth. i just don't see that. you know, consumers choosing how their information is going to be managed is not going to affect what people are going to offer. they're going to offer it with protections. i would assume. but let me ask specifically the other two witnesses. what other privacy principles, other than just this idea of transparency and choice? there are other privacy principles at stake here, like data retention limits, for instance. or, you know, purpose specification, et cetera. can you talk about the -- either of you, sort of what the breadth of interests are here that go beyond just the transparency choice? >> i'm -- well, i -- senator kerry, as i said in my remarks to senator toomey, we can't depend just on notice and choice. you know, that is part of the problem with the existing system. the principles that