let me--let me-- let me preface that-- professor o'leary wants to know the answer.you clear of a valuation-- are you groveling and begging 'cause you know the answer is crazy? we want--he wants to know-- okay. connor, can i take it? what's crazy is to try to value a company that is pre-revenue. (connor) it makes no sense. we could do discounted cash flow-- well done. point well done. let me value it. you know what? but the problem is that--is-- (jillian) but i can talk discounted cash flows and intangible assets right now. one second. one second. (kevin) 'cause you know-- jillian, you know... bring it on. let's do it. you're gonna sell exactly how many in 12 months? you don't know. yes. well, i don't know exactly. (laughs) how much are you saying your company is worth? okay, 200--if we sell 200,000 units in the first year-- no, wait. no, no, no. you asked for-- the question is, when you impute a value on the company-- i give you $100,000, you give me 20% of the stock-- what are you telling me your company's worth today? i based 2 valuation methods off of 200,000 uni

. >> let me explain.try egypt. >> jon: you know it is in africa. >> very good jon, you're learning, so remember the muslim brotherhood. >> jon: yes, yes guns beards, sunni briefly in charge of egypt. >> yes, until the military threw them out with backing from the saudis. well now the saudis and the egyptian army are fighting shiite rebels together in yemen. guess who is fighting alongside them. >> jon: yes chuck norris. >> yes close the muslim brotherhood in yemen. >> jon: the muslim brotherhood in yemen are allies with the guys who threwÑi them out of egypt. they're buddies now. >> of course not they hate the [bleep] out of each other. they just happen to be pointing their guns at the same people right now. and guess who else is rooting for team saudi. >> jon: chuck norris? >> close. isis and al qaeda. those ass holes are so happy they are getting they are popping their halal champagne. >> jon: ed way to figure it is the sunni shia split sunni will always have a sunni brother's back. >> yes except in eur

let me say this. if we want to have influence in asia we're going to have to pass tpa. and we're going to have to get get tpa put together right. that will send messages we could never otherwise send. so without this bill we're never going to accomplish what both of you would like to do. let me say this. the tpa bill that senator wyden and i introduced already tackles the concern that this amendment seeks to address. our bill already requires that the president take into account all of the congressional negotiating objectives before commencing negotiations with any country. that will include china. if in the future china became interested in joining the tpp. and section 5a of our bill sets that detailed consultation and reporting requirements, that the president must follow before entering into negotiations with any country. the best thing we can do to counteract china is to pass tpa. so that our negotiators can conclude a tpp based on american standards. and if we can get japan into a tpp which we're

that's what i will do. >> let me answer these quest. first of all to ed miliband we've created 2 million jobs. when he sat in the cabinet, about half a million people lost their jobs. with ed there would be zero jobs. let me take on nigel on this. you want to leave the eu. it's a very clear position. but the only way that can happen is by having a referendum. stay in, fight get a better deal but hold the ref ren dpum. the irony for nigel's position is they vote for him and end up with miliband. >> i want to come back. >> thank you. nigel farage. thank you david cameron. >> second tame in this debate. >> i want to come back. >> thank you, david cameron. >> twice in this debate. >> thank you nigel farage. let's hear the point op syria. thank you. >> we have taken some people from syria, some of the most vulnerable people including elderly and disabled people. but the most important thing we can do in syria is maintain the fact that we're the second largest bilateral aid donor helping people in the refugee camps to be clothed and housed an

let me straight forward. i received a letter from the department of justice in regards key documentation between 1995 and 2015 with the san francisco police department. the one thing is clear, they are speaking about no racial profiling in san francisco. that is interesting because when we request documentation from the sfpd, a lot of times they send us to the sheriff department and say these documents don't exist: want to know how many murders happened in san francisco from 1984-2015 and say they can't provide t. they provide it from pressure from a attorney. my point is this, san francisco has got to be aware that this is a monster that is out of control. it is wise to bring in department of justice because pin other cities like cleveland and philadelphia where the chief at that time charles ramsy said we can't control this, it is too political so we need outside help. we shouldn't stress our resources and man power and woman power to disregard the fact that san francisco has a lot of issues that are happen

so i felt i was like let me explain you know. ut it is it's your way of processing that information. >> yes. >> jon: and what you have done. >> very much so. like me going me doing let me explain that was my way to give directly and contact with the people that support me. you hear things there's blogs there is the media there is critics that say all this stuff. well thing about doing stand-up we have a direct connection. i have a microphone i have an audience that sees me, i will beat everybody else to it by explaining it myself. >> jon: dow ofever worry by making better choices for yourself by your life you are taking away good material for your act? >> yeah. that has been a concern. >> jon: i wonder about that. >> it has been a concern. >> jon: right. >> that's why you have to throw some dumb [bleep] in there once in a while. (applause) >> jon: it's so true. i say no man you just got to clean it all up man you got to straighten out. >> jon: you have to do some dumb [bleep] every now and again. >> the reason i call this what now

let me answer it just directly. our original suggestions to our partner was that we sit down and we specify three or four or five bills that need to be introduced particularly reforms and indeed we settle them. build trust. this is the only way we know how to do it. let's agree on three measures that need to be taken and you watch us take them and watch the limitations and pass judgment on us depending on -- we didn't get anywhere because we were told that if you -- everything has to be discussed. my fear is when you discuss everything you're not discussing about much. let me share another source of frustration with you. we enter these negotiations and constantly asking for nar rowing down the focus, the specificity that you're referring to and we present proposals 10 page, 20 pages, 100 pages, particular proposals which are not discussed. instead we have the comprehensive review which is effectively an avalanche of questions and questionnaires about this and that and the other and that's nopt the same thing as talk

let me take them very quickly one after the other. let's look at productivity growth. reversing that decline in advanced economies requires lowering barriers to entry in product and services market. our research shows, for instance, that improving the allocation of labor and capital across sectors can significantly increase total factor productivity, tfp, as it's call. another example is the potential benefit from improving access to finance for smaller businesses. you know everybody talks about smes. we have to encourage smes. well, of course. of course. because they generally -- most countries, certainly the advanced economies but also now to a much larger extent in emerging market economies -- they represent most of the employment and they represent the largest number of companies. well unfortunately if we look at europe, for instance they also hold a share of non-performing loans that is 50% higher, on average than larger corporations. so clearly putting the small business sector on firmer footer would yield a big payoff. this is same story in china. where small bu

let me solve the problem. uh hu.ve everyone that calls and helps us advertise it by telling their friends about it. i'm going to throw in four more steak knives. that will give you eight steak knives. twenty-five pieces. right. twenty-five pieces for just three payments of thirteen thirty-three. right. and amazing. that's about a dollar and a half each. can you imagine getting one of these for a buck and a half? impossible. if you call within the next 18 minutes we'll send you two complete sets of showtime cutlery for the price of one. that's a complete 25 piece set absolutely free. the second set makes a great gift or use it in a second home or rv. but you must call now to take advantage of this incredible free offer. if you help us advertise this fabulous showtime knife package you'll also receive my latest invention free. it's the showtime solid flavor injector. come on over here and i'll show you how it works. now, this is my new solid flavor injector. over here i have some garlic and i'm gonna put the garlic clo

i had maybe two also. >> let me start with you, howard, my fellow pink-diapered baby. case. let's start with this. it seems to me that the country has held this philosophy that we don't want to end up with latin america, with 17 families running a country, or europe or the germans or the brits with a few families owning all the land and all the money, because it just kept accumulating over generations. we basically say you can leave a ton of money to your kids but only a ton, and then it's got to stop. so the republicans don't think a ton is enough. $10 plus million is not enough to give to your kids so how can they win that case and why did 11 democrats join them today? >> that's a mystery to me. i don't think they can win the case. if you look at the polling numbers generally, let's concede two points. number one rich people are paying a greater and greater share of the taxes, but the reason they are is that they're making more and more of the money as compared to everyone else. number two, americans do like tax cuts, but they don't i think, like this kind. they're no

that's what i want to do. >> you've had your -- >> let me take this point. people know with me if we fall short, i'll do the right thing for the country. i did last time. i would again. i would still plead with people with seven dayses to go particularly particularly when you're faced with an alternative of a labor government. people don't want our country to succeed or even exist. when that's your alternative, put your trust in 23 more seats for the can rveonservatives and we'll have a strong government. >> david cameron. >> thank you very much. [ applause ] >> so our next -- our next party leader is from the labor party. would you welcome ed miliband, please? [ applause ] >> thank you very much. thank you. >> the first question is from elizabeth moody, please. elizabeth moody. >> good evening, mr. miliband. >> hello, elizabeth. >> five years ago the outgoing labor treasury minister left a message, there's no money left. how can we trust the labor party with the uk economy? >> we just saw it by the way, because -- >> david cameron had it in his pocket. >> it

and i just want to say, let me be there in your sate morning, let me be there in your city night. let me change those [inaudible] and make it right. make it right. let me wonder for this district wonder land that we certainly do share, all i ask you is let me be there. all i ask you also too do, i sure hope you care. >> thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon. my name is [inaudible] i'm 83 years old. [inaudible] who is 1 and a half year on the street out of my house. i'm homeless. i ask you so many times for help to bring me back to my home because 83 years old person should have a home, not anything else. but you are dealing like the board of supervisors and mayor yang is president. are you not afraid god will punish you like it punished kennedy family for the same thing. 500 women and children to gas chamber in [inaudible] >> thank you, next speaker, please >> first of all i would like to say you are [inaudible] hardest workers in the city is the fire department. i'm [inaudible] a native of san francisco and graduated in 1983. i remembered [inaudible] finest

jason, let me finish with you.oing back to this question of iran there is some talk at the white house perhaps you make a deal with iran and this begins to open up a new chapter there's more engagement less isolation, it will change iran's behavior. the flip side we'll give them billions of dollars more which boosts their economy and their ability to be a bad actor. >> well i think one way to look at this in terms of whether we conceded too much is to look at who is chairing the agreement and who is not. why are our adversaries more excited about this deal than our strategic allies, like france and saudi arabia and the rest of the sunnis and the arab states as well as israel. >> all right. >>> we have to take a break here. but when we come back, the fire storm of a religious freedom bill in indiana and arkansas raises questions over who is really being intolerant. our sunday group debates that. >>> plus a dismal jobs report has experts wondering how strong is an economic recovery. >>> this is a bill that an ordinar

and that's it. >> jon: let me ask a question. >> tell me. >> jon: did you really see my movie? movies. >> jon: son of a bitch. >> yeah sorry. >> jon: no i meant you. >> yes, i know. >> jon: i'm being you i'm you you're me. >> i don't want to. >> jon: all right let's switch it around. you know what is sad? >> huh? >> jon: physically. >> yes. >> jon: we could pull this off. >> are we related we're cousins. >> jon: give me your face here get a little close. look at this. (applause) at some point in a biblical land my great great great great great gand father and your great great great great grandfather, whatever said i'm going to go this way you go that way. >> whatever. >> jon: how are you doing? >> i'm great. >> jon: you know i love you. >> i like you, a lot. >> jon: really, not-- i mean -- >> i don't know you. i mean-- you know. >> jon: we've never met. >> you are funny and you tell the stuff the show. >> jon: do you still-- dow still enjoy going to the record stores an going in and browsing. >> i don't. it's more of a-- it's too deep. it's too much. i can't do it right now. >>

. >> thank you it's a pleasure to be back terry hill vice president at hill physicians let me start with commitment can i do that and here with me are people from both uc and dignity health dr. kevin if you can stand up from ucsf and others and one from dignity health they've authorized me short lease to say their one hundred percent committed to continuing this effort i would remind the group katherine mentioned a few minutes is it fair to say several years ago it was birth analytic in july 4th years and i can't commend this board enough for its long term commitment to this it takes time for the efforts to mature we're happy to being on all cylinder and the benefit of the entire population i have to say personally that is a real personal commitment i went to school at ucsf it was a city and county employee for a number of years i would like to see san francisco on the cutting-edge of the policy in the country that's the commitment piece we're in that for the longs haul we've invested a lot of open the brown and toland and ucsf side and will continue to make the investments as to what le

let me just begin by asking a question. how much does our torture domestic politics shape international perceptions of america's power? >> well it's a good question and i think too much is the short answer. we often damage ourselves by making us look weaker or dumber than we are. that's hard, but if you take this asian international investment bank where we decided that people shouldn't join this chinese bank, there were headlines in asia saying this was a sign of american decline. i said no its just a sign of american stupidity. we have done stupid things for centuries. what we should have said is let this bank go forward but make sure that it's a transparent international institutions so that if the british and the germans and others join it there's a much more likelihood that it will be held to a certain accounting standards that there would be less chinese corruption in it and the idea that we would spend political capital to try to stop it is just. now i'm behind that was the fact that when we read in 2010 to increase

but let me say this. that although we -- you had people who in 1964 and '65, they were protesting and that they were they were challenging whatever was happening. they had a goal. and i'm not so sure that today, these kids have any goals, other than to burn the cvs, or to burn the -- >> reverend if i can -- >> and that's problematic, because it's one thing when you have a goal and you have a righteous goal but i do not believe the kids out there have any kind of goal. and i was out there too, just to see what was going on and it was clear to me there's no goal, and there is no -- >> mark claxton, you wanted to respond to that? >> i want to say, i agree on those comments. i think what's important here is that not necessarily these young people out here engaged in this crazy behavior on the streets and destruction and stealing and fires, et cetera but there are goals that are set from other individuals that have been expressed, and there's a desperate need on a national level, whether it be through legislat

let me bp size -- absolutely not. let me be precise.we mentioned or you alluded to a great gap between the policies that are being pursued by our government and the policies that would be acceptable to our partners. i don't think of it that way. remember what i, the key word i use, pluralism. we used to live in societies where we tolerated differences of opinion and different mixes of public and private virtues. so you recall in the '70s and even in the early '80s we used to take great pride of the fact we live in a mixed economy where we had a public sector playing an important role, when we had conventions and norms of the collective bargaining that created a safety net in the workplace, where we had the social welfare net that also played the same role in guarding humanitarian issues. we have public enterprise, public-private enterprises. i remember one of the great arguments in favor of capitalism back in the old cold war days was precisely this pluralism. now what we are bringing to the table there is a notion that the monoculture

not in the republican primary but in a general election. >> let me bring in benjamin hardy, associatees." he was with us at the top of the show before the governor's comments. let's talk about how this will play out politically with the more conservative in the party there. >> sure. well, as i was saying before this really does represent a huge divide within the party here. the governor is in a position right now where notice he did not actually say at any point he would veto the bill. he's asking the legislature to make changes, but the fact is in arkansas, a simple majority can override a gubernatorial veto. if governor hutchinson were to veto the bill the republican-controlled legislature could send it right back to his desk and override his veto. >> but he discussed executive order, something he said is not often used in the state but something he's considering. >> yeah and that's really interesting because he's talking there about directly addressing this question of discrimination. so it would be quite an irony if through this discussion with hb-1228 he were to sign an executive

let me tell you, sir. there are in this latest letter dated yesterday 218 letters, we refer to them, five investigations noted. the records they wish to receive that are being delayed involved e-mail. we have turned over 35,000 e-mails to them. 215 e-mails out of 35,000 that we're working with them to go through. we believe in the rule of law. we have a real disagreement with the inspecter general. >> mr. horowitz. >> can i be clear? they're not working with us to get us to 200 e-mails. they haven't given us the 200 e-mails. our understanding is it's because they believe they have a legal review to conduct. that's why what our understanding is is to why we're not getting them. for several of these matters these are multi months we have been waiting for them. there is no reason why we should not be getting the materials immediately. none whatsoever. i understand they have a legal position. it is different. frankly, the easiest way to resolve this, and i think on this we're in complete agreement, is that the

so let me suggest this. first of all, i appreciate if this was a clerk thing or whatever but we need to have these things resofd before we go to committee hearing. i don't want to start dleeth things if it's the last time you come before the committee. i don't appreciate this is going on right now. let me suggest this, i would like to have a motion to continue this item and we'll go on recess until 1:00. so when we gafl down for our full board meeting, we can solve it this. this seems to be a little bit less subs then et but i don't want to trip any wires here. we'll come back and really regret it. so let me suggest that as a course of action and we can work on that in the next few hours. okay. with that being said, we will have to open this up to public comment firt. anybody want to comment on item 9? i already took public comment. thank you very much. so do we have a motion to continue number 9? >> so moved to 1:00. >> so how are we going to do this? we're going to make our 10:00 meeting go into recess the

let me just say this. i appreciate your concern, senator scott. what you expressed in relation to this amendment. but i believe these concerns can be addressed without the need for an amendment. the tpa bill has extensive requirements they must meet during, before and after negotiating an agreement. each consultation addresses the amendment and your amendment as i understand mentions regulatory harmonization. i have a note that regulatory harmineonization is forcing anyone to change their standards. it means where our trading partners have the same standards as we do our governments will look for way do is make those regulations more efficient. if the standards are the same there is no reason for our businesses to have to fill out one form for doing business at home and another set when they sell their products in europe. i pledge to work with you senator scott, to try to resolve these in a manner that pleases you and others that support that but i would ask you to withdraw the amendment. >> thank you. i w

, let me know. thank you -- not. >> thank you both. i don't want to get on the wrong side of you, and i never have. thanks, michael steele. >> you've got it. >>> up next, what do colin powell, al pacino and regis philbin have in common? they're all from the bronx. alan alda, and his wife arlene, she's the author, she's got a new book about growing up in the bronx. they're coming here next. >>> welcome back to "hardball." frank sinatra famously sang about new york, if you can make it there, you can make it anywhere. in the new book, arlene alda tells the story of 60 americans who grew up in the bronx, including colin powell, actor al pacino and regis philbin. the stories show how it was part of the quint essentially american expense. in his praise for the book, president bill clinton said, no matter where you grew up, you'll find this a down to earth inspiring book about the american promise fulfilled. i'm joined by arlene alda and alan alda, known for his role in m.a.s.h., but also in the losing pre

now, let me share a thought with you. nothing would be easier for me personally, nothing would be easier for my prime minister nothing would be easier than design on the bottom line of the existed memorandum of understanding. of the existing program, nothing would be easier than pledging to do what it says. like previous governments, always pledged everything that was asked of them. in that way to collect several billion very quickly and immediately answer the questions that the good people of the financial press are posting full of angst for us regarding our liquidity situatn. except that it would be the wrong thing to do -- that it would be the wrong thing to do by our creditors, wrong by our partners, wrong but our people. when i say our people and he nudges the people of greece but equally every citizen of every member state of the eurozone. we are one people. why would it have been wrong to have our signature to the logic of the philosophy of the existing pre-existing problem? because ladies and gentlemen this problem

and francis, let me begin with you. i once when you were in the middle of this on thein the desert on the ground you thought that you were going to die? >> i did. >> tell me what happened. tell me how many times you were kicked and beaten. do you recall? >> it felt like an eeternity. i thought it was never going to end. >> do i still see a bruised left eye here some of your injuries from that incident last week? >> yeah. a lot of my injuries are underneath but you can see a few bruises on my head or lacerations on the head and my eye. >> francis, have you actually -- >> if i could just add -- >> have you seen it yourself? >> a few times i've seen edited versions of it. >> and your thoughts watching yourself in this video? >> completely unnecessary. even without watching the video, completely unnecessary. >> jim, i want to talk to you in just a second but francis, let me stay with you. i understand this all began after deputies were trying to serve a search warrant in this identity theft investigation. you hopped in a car

let me answer a question.ou asked a question and said how have your views changed saying my views of change. instead of editorializing and saying my views of change. >> rand paul went on to give on some reporting advice to another journalist, this one from the ap, who asked him to clarify his position on abortion. >> i would reported exactly the way i said it. i gave you a five-minute answer. >> in your office pool of how long it would take for the thinness of rand paul's skin to reveal itself, if you picked one day, congratulations. mark? my question to you is is already it already clear just 24 hours that his prickliness prove to be his fatal flaw? >> the man's skin is thinner than that on a peking duck what if kmart. greetings from chicago, where rahm emanuel was at this community center. i was talking with some kids. we'll talk about that later. this is like nostradamus or cassandra for this one. this is a guy who knows that being thin-skinned is a problem. we did not give all the examples today. he was de

and let me begin with you. >> thank you for having me. i would like to thank the organizers of this event for convening this timely event. and i would like to emphasis i am not in the position and other i mean people or group of people and just for a member of the parliament. i think we are very close to a histor historic moment and achievement in solving the big international crisis peacefully and diplomatically. i evan imagine i could see this such rate of progress. i remember two years ago, we sent a letter with former members of parliament two or three letters, president obama and all of them, proposed it in january 7th 2013. we had a lot of difficulties to even initiative and talk about and convince people in washington, d.c. i remember that there would have been some colleagues and i sat in such a panel discussion to propose and convene spectics in washington to even know there. this great administration is coming we said. but we just heard something from rumors that intentions are going on between talking and behind the scenes betw

jason fichtner: let me just -- david burton: let me just mention one quick thing. if -- you want to send -- $100 spend $100 in walmart tomorrow -- if you want to spent $100 in walmart tomorrow, how much is earned? the income tax is, in effect, a consumption tax. it just also taxes savings and investments again. it is not as if consumption is somehow off the hook in income tax. jason fichtner: it is very important that people generally understand -- david burton: it is important that people understand it. their definition is consumption is change in net worth. according to think about is how much do you have to earn pretax to spend money today -- and if we have a 50% tax, the tax is consumption. then if it is a -- if you want to consume in the future, they also tax that consumption plus whatever you earn by deferring it. that is really different. -- difference. it is a tax treatment of future consumption. jason fichtner: there are two sort of principles that economists try to apply when thinking about what the fair tax code -- and of course, fairness is in the eye o

me a lot. but i'm trying to get over it and let him talk to me.'ll deal with these issues together. because that's what you want. and we're delivering. [ applause ] >> the folks from new england, you can tell. [ applause ] >> let me quickly address the issue about lowering costs. because it's actually embedded in title 1 of our grow america act. it's a very important initiative that we've worked with epa and our other partners in the administration who are responsible for the environmental review process. and that is the whole series of statutory provisions all to allow us to speed up the environmental review process on our infrastructure projects, while getting better results for the environment. and it's not all that hard, but some of it does take statutory change. areas where we could do our reviews coincidentally or at the same time, rather than concurrently, where someone is going through the file for many months only to hand it to the next agency who hands it to the next agency. we're making progress on that. we think we can make a lot more

you know likely at the end of the year. >> let me close and let people stay in their seats because i know you have to get to another meeting right outside here. this was a great terrific conversation. wonderful speech. i am going to hold you to what was on the podium. we'll get you back a year from now. we'll see how we've done. and i really look forward to having you back at atlantic council. >> i'm absolutely coming back if we can celebrate the tpp the ttip and the imf reform. [ applause ] >>> we were experiencing some audio difficulties with this hearing with samantha power. we have fixed that and bring you live coverage now here on c-span3. >> -- no one nation should can address today's global challenges alone. that is why we must continue to work together with the world community using every tool at our disposal. unilateral action should be the last option, not the first. those who view the u.n. negatively or advocate for reducing its resources undermine the u.n.'s effectiveness and limit our ability to influence international decisions. simply put, we cannot expect the u.n. to

let me just say. i've legislation actually that i've introduced for several years now: for congress to go on record supporting as two state solution and the peace process. having said that, i want to make sure that we are clear that is important that both sides agree that a two state solution is the ultimate outcome and achievable and what they are seeking. i know the last few months that we have had some dialogue back and forth with regard to whether or not mr. netanyahu wanted a two state solution and this process to move forward. i hope that this chain of events that is taken funds -- taken place since then that we are now back to agreeing that the palestinians and israelis deserve a two state solution and we are going to encourage that to continue. i think that the yuan is let's be very important in your role in that. i do know that we have a little bit of history of what took place as it relates to concern about whether or not the two state solution was still a viable option in both parties. poli

. >> let me give you -- exactly. let me give you a perfect example. the drug you're talking about -- my sister-in-law is a pharmaceutical rep, and i was blessed because i was trying to do everything that i could to not only get out of pain, but i still do a lot of training. and every person that i train is living in pain. as we get older, everybody has knee pain, joint pain, back pain. i don't care what it is -- everybody that i talk to has pain. and my sister-in-law was a rep that was selling one of these nsaids, one of these pharmaceutical drugs. she happened to have called us about a month before they pulled them from the market, and i had really seriously thought about taking these nsaids because i was in serious pain. nothing was working. and i know that there's people out there watching right now that have tried everything. nothing was working. >> right. >> and mary says, "jim, don't take it. they're about to pull it off the market because that product has been proven to kill thousands and cause hundreds of millions of people very severe side ef

it's probably for the sake of sem plisty, let me re -- simplicity let me remind the audience, we are not just talking about the emerging world. if you have driven a car, you brim. >> we lost a bridge in the past week. >> you are talking about electry fixation fixation. the subject a worldwide. it is about the question of making an investment case, and they are only three sources of money, three ts. it's taxes terrace or transfer of private money. these are the three sources we are talking about. we are not doing a good job as the industries that are involved in infrastructure construction engineering is providing certainty with regard to the revenue streams which are coming outs of infrastructure assets, and providing certainty with the cost of construction, and in these two case, if they are made in a thorough way, i agree with peter, money is not the issue, but to make the connection, and make it as the minister said, in a way that not only at the beginning, the feasibility study is done in a thorough fashion, but during the construction, constantly during the implementation of inf

let me add my thanks. i don't think i need to tell anyone who has read the paper in the last couple weeks the importance of the negotiations with iran, but also the importance of the timing right now. we seem to be at a turning point. there may be a foundation from which to move forward. something that will last for quite some time. or, conversely, we might look back at these two days and say this was the moment when negotiations collapsed, when things that had seemed so promising no longer look that way. making this more complex, in contrast to many negotiations, not everyone believes the deal is the best outcome. in both iran and the united states, there are many serious critical voices that believe that a negotiated agreement is a much worse outcome than no agreement. i am delighted to say that even by brookings standards, we have a pretty superb panel for you. we have three people up here who have long been looking at government aspects of the questions they are going to address today. our first speake

let me go back to toure. i'm sorry, let me go to chris hayes. chris hayes has an interesting guest, a bishop from philadelphia. >> i'm here were the bishop from philadelphia today. where do you breech in -- do you preach in fill? >> you can see behind us there's a youth march, and a huge youth march coming down of folks saying we want peace! we want peace! >> what brought you down here today? how did you make the decision? you came down with a few fellow clergy. >> well, we realized that there were some communications problems here in philadelphia and that people were hurting, and where there are hurting people, that's where you'll find myself and my staff so we came down and there will be a voice for people in the community as well as for the government. >> were there a bunch of clergy was there sort of a lot of communication from the clergy from around the surrounding area to come down here and try to create a situation of what's going to lead to a repeat of last night? >> that's correct. there are a number of different denominations that have

well, let me say. to those who would write to those premature obituaries, the american dream is not dead. the american train will not die because you and i are going to fight for it and make it true again. our economy is the product of the choices we make and the choices we fail to make. do you mean to tell me we can concentrate wealth at the top as it never has been before, but we cannot create good jobs and good wages to support a family? do you mean to tell me that we can pay record bonuses on wall street, but we cannot eradicate childhood hunger? i do not buy it, and neither should you. we are better than this. we are better than this. we are americans. we make our own destiny, and it is going to be up to the democratic party to finish the work that we have begun together, and what is that work? that work is to make the economy work for all of us again, to restore the american dream. give me a favor here. close your eyes if it is helpful. and i want you to think of your parents and your grandparent

it hurts a little bit -- >> let me cut you off. let me cut you off. want you to be okay and grab some water to you and your crew. we'll pull away. let's go to the conference in baltimore. >> local and state partners, right now we're having partners from washington, d.c. we're incredibly thankful for the support of our partners to help us. we're deploying to critical infrastructure sites, locations that have experienced previous incidents of lawlessness and areas where investigative efforts tell us we need to be. we will respond quickly and efficiently to incidents that take place, but again, we are hoping that we don't see any of those today. right now we know that a minimum of 20 officers have been injured during the course of the lawlessness that took place. we expect that number might be a little bit higher. we've had reports that our officers have sustained minor injuries do not want to come off the line, did not want to seek medical treatment. they wanted to stay with their other law enforcement officers and help protect the city of baltimore. we

carolyn ryan, let me start with you. the "new york times" story today does describe a canadian-- a wealthy canadian businessman. he's the chairman of this company that owns significant uranium mining interests in the united states. he also happens to be making huge-- large donations to the foundations. and then it turns to the move by the russian atoo atomic energy to buy interest in that country. fill us in there. >> the nub, essentially, the ethical issue here is that this panel, u.s. government panel was overseeing and had to sign off on this deal, and the donations that you speak of were not disclosed by the clintons as they agreed to do as part of the agreement that they set up with the obama administration when mrs. clinton became secretary of state. so it was multi-million-dollar contributions that were not disclosed, leading up to this key vote on whether this deal could go through. >> woodruff: and what is the clinton campaign-- what is the clinton foundation saying? we do have one statement that i guess they pu

and if they would have been finished, they would have told me, you know, let me search you. praying nothing goes wrong. i'm in her line. she is about to search me. everything is good. so i walk up to her, and i put my arms out. she is being actually pretty rough. she was, you know, tapping me real hard and grabbing me. i was looking at her like, okay, but then as i saw how the other security guards, they all kind of were a little aggressive. so i'm thinking maybe they have to be this way. she comes down towards my breasts, she stops. she is like, what is that? and i was like, nothing. >> nadie. nada. >> she was, like, come with me. and i give her the look like, you got to be kidding me right now. the pills didn't wear off yet. i'm trying to be positive on every level. okay. maybe she has to do this. maybe this is part of the whole routine. the first thing she does is she goes into the bra. and she pulls out the package. i'm thinking like, okay, maybe she has to do this, maybe she is supposed to do this. i'm just kind of confused. at the moment, i guess the pills were like a