let me conclude. this is not 2003. we must not use past mistakes as an excuse for indifference or inaction. and let's be clear, mr. speaker, inaction does not amount to a strategy for our security or for the syrian people, but inaction is a choice. i believe it's the wrong choice. we face a clear threat. we've listened to our allies. we've taken legal advice. we have a unanimous united nations resolution. we've discussed our proposed action extensively at meetings of the national security council and cabinet. i've responded personally to the detailed report of the foreign affairs select committee. we have a proper motion before this house, and we're having a 10.5-hour debate today. in that spirit, i look forward to the rest of the debate. i look forward to listening to the contribution of members on all sides of this house, but i hope at the end of it all, the house will come together in large numbers for britain to play its part in defeating these evil extremists, and taking the action that is needed now to keep our co

let me turn. i said in the house last week was me say a little bit more about the nonmilitary elements counterterrorism and extremism, the diplomatic process and the vital humanitarian work my honorable friend referred to. it gives britannica breeds of plan to prevent and foil the plot at home and address the ideology that is the root cause of the threats we face and as a part of this i can announce today we would establish a comprehensive review to root out any remaining funding of extremism in the uk. this would be the major scale including any overseas sources. it would report to myself and my honorable friends and i will make this point before giving way again there are some that suggests military action could undermine our extremism strategy by radicalizing the british muslims. so if we take this head on, they are appalled and these women raping monsters are hijacking the religion of islam and as the king of jordan said in the article today, these people are not muslims, they are from islam an

speaker, let me be clear. people will not return to syria if part of it is under the control of an organization that people, throws gay people off buildings, beheads aid workers, and forces children to marry before they are even 10 years old. so we cannot separate the humanitarian work and the reconstruction work from dealing with daesch itself. >> i think the prime minister for giving way. welcome his views about terminology. i asked the prime minister a question as a new memory of this house. given that the language being used would be considered , and for the benefit of new members, with the prime minister withdraw his remarks? david cameron: i think everyone is now focused on the main issues in front of us. the plan for to pro -- for post-conflict reconstruction. oneid we should commit to billion pounds for reconstruction. it would be for security, stabilization, and confidence building measures, including basic you military and needs, and helping the refugees to return. over time, the focus would shift to

[shouting] >> let me quote some data about the nhs. let me take an average day today compared with five years ago when he became prime minister, on an average there are 4,400 more operations, there are 21,000 more outpatient appointments. yes, there are challenges in a&e but there are 2 thousands 00 more people seen within four hours today than five years ago and there is more data published in nhs than there was in labor. >> mr. speaker, they are largely due to the precious on the adult social care system which is under enormous stress at the moment. indeed, huge cuts in adult social care because of cuts in local government funding. nhs has called for radical upgrade. would the prime minister agree with me that cutting crucial services is a faulty economy? [shouting] >> so that locals can spend more. i notice that the honorable gentleman mentions simon stevens, nhs for the first time got together and wrote their plan. they asked us for a billion pounds. they asked for the money up front and we committed to that plan unlike labour and

chuck, let me just say this. let's be clear. >> okay. >> as a result of a breach caused by the dnc vendor, not by us, information came into our campaign about the clinton campaign. >> magically? wait? magically came there or you had a staffer that got it? >> yes, that's what -- >> you believe it accidentally came in. >> that's not disputed. there was a breach caused by the incompetence of the dnc vendor. that information came into our campaign. first time it came in our staff did the right thing. they said "we have information from the clinton campaign, we don't want this." and they went to the dnc. the second time a staffer or more, we don't know yet, we're doing that investigation, screwed up and we have fired that person. point is the dnc then proposed because of the initial screwup on their part to take away our access to our own information which significantly hampers our campaign. fortunately that has been resolved. >> all right, senator sanders i'll leave it there. i know it was a late night, early morning.

pull over and let me out. pick me up later. i'll walk. >> i'll walk to hollywood boulevard. it's fine, i'll walk there. >> jimmy: did you ever want to change your mind? i know a lot of the girls -- >> when i was in -- when i was in second grade and everybody was calling me smelly kelly with peanut butter and jelly in her belly. [ laughter ] i was like, maybe i'll change my name. but it's just -- i'm too lazy. i got distracted. >> jimmy: yeah, and it works. now look at who has smelly kelly with peanut butter and jelly in her belly. [ cheers and applause ] kelly with peanut butter and jelly in her belly. are you psyched for thanksgiving? what are you doing? >> i'm psyched, yeah, yeah. >> jimmy: are you gonna see the parents again? >> the parents are coming. mark's parents, my parents. >> jimmy: both parents. >> the nieces are coming. all the additional, like, my sister-in-law is coming, our friends who don't have family in the city, they're coming. >> jimmy: that's fun. >> yeah, it's fun. we always play -- do you ever play the white elephant game where you put all the presents

let me through , please! let me through! mayor: oh, my! those are the most beautiful boots i've ever seen! that is the gift, papa! that is what i want for christmas! the red boots! uh, yes, of course, dear. then you shall have them. (bell dings) shoemaker? yes, mayor? how may i help you this fine christmas eve? oh, ho, ho. you are a sly one, shoemaker. christmas eve indeed. i do not understand, mr. mayor. "i have not made a new pair of shoes for quite some time, mr. mayor." (chuckles) you knew i would not find a gift as magnificent as these boots anywhere in friedensdorf, so you waited until christmas eve to get the price up. so, what is your price? i am sorry, mayor, but these boots are not for sale. they are a gift. a gift for my adelaide! now name your price. no! the boots are not for sale, not at any price! (gasping, mumbling) grrr... time to go! yes, i have lots of shopping to do myself. i think i left a teapot boiling. this is not over, shoemaker! i mean to have those boots! (door slams) i could not give up the red boots, aldo. they

>> i think the answer is i'll know it -- and by the way, let me say, coming here to texas, the response has been extraordinary. we have had huge meetings and i want to thank the people of texas. and that tells me there is a lot of support for the agenda we're bringing forward. >> but you don't want to be specific about a timetable? >> not right now. >> all right, good. senator sanders, thank you very much. good luck whatever you decide, sir. >> thank you. >> thank you so much. [cheering and applause]. >> we'd love to have you join us in the studio. visit our website at klru.org/overheard to find invitations to interviews, q&as with our audience and guests, and an archive of past episodes. >> what is really disturbing, and i think an international embarrassment is the degree that virtually all republicans still refuse to acknowledge that climate change is real and caused by human activity and causing devastating problems. >>> funding for "overhead" with evan smith is provided in part by m.f.i. foundation, improving the quality of life within our community. and from the texas board of leg

and let me quote him some data about the nhs. let he jume just take an arm da today compared with five years ago when i became prime minister. on an average day, there are 4,400 more operations. 21,000 more outpatient appointments. yes, they are challenges in a&e, but 2,100 more people seen within four hours today than five years ago. and there is more data published in our nhs than there ever was under labor. >> mr. speaker, there are huge pressures on the nhs, and they are largely due to the pressures on the adult social care system, which is under enormous stress at the moment, it indeed has been huge cuts in adult social care because of cuts in local government funding. simon stevens has called for a radical upgrade in public health. so would the prime minister agree with me that cutting these services is a false economy? >> we're increasing the money that's able to go into social care by having the it 2% pre-set on the council tax so local councils can spend more. but i notice that the ripe old gentleman the mentions simon st

let me show you this.ing to simmons research, here are the top ten places where conservatives shop. most stores are located in the south. here are the stores where liberals shop, mostly in urban areas. you'll notice not one store in the conservative list appears on the liberal list, nor one store on the liberal list appearing on the conservative list. a lot of this is geography but it shows you how we have totally sorted ourselves out. >>> we'll be back in a moment with the speaker of the house paul ryan on what he thinks he and the president can actually get done. (donkey noise) (elephant noise) (mic screech) there's a big difference between making noise... (mic tap) ...and making sense. (elephant noise) (donkey noise) when it comes to social security, we need more than lip service. our next president needs a real plan to keep social security strong. (elephant noise) hey candidates! enough talk. give us a plan. his day of coaching begins with knee pain, when... this is brad. hey brad, wanna trade the all

well let me say this.s president i don't care if baghdad doesn't want the sunnis on the ground to be able to fight isis and help us destroy their training camps, we will supply, support, train, finance and help them have safe areas where they can mount their attacks on the ground against isis. [ applause ] and, by the way, if that isn't enough, we should send in american troops. send american special operation force, destroy their training centers. destroy their planning hubs. destroy their social media capability centers and then get out. not so that we can stay there for ten years but so that we can send a clear and convincing message to the world that when we say we're going to destroy and degrade isis over time, over time isn't in the next century, over time is in the next year and isis will be destroyed and degraded. [ applause ] now i don't want to sound like a militaryist but i know how important this is and i know what it's like to have loved ones in harm's way. i have two sons. my older sons when

let me say this. as a member of the health education committee that helped write the affordable care act, much of what secretary clinton said about what we have done, among other things, ending the obscenity of this pre-existing situation is a step forward. this seventeen more million more people have health care. it is a step forward. a step forward. but this is what we also have to say. not only are deductibles rising, 29 million americans still have no health insurance and millions of people can't afford to go to the doctor. major crisis and primary health care. here is the bottom line. why is it that the united states of america today is the only major country on earth that does not guarantee health care to all people as a right? why is it -- [applause] mr. sanders: why is it that we are -- why is it that we spend almost three times per capita as to what they spend in the u.k., 50% more than what they pay in france, countries that guarantee health care to all of their people and in many cases, hav

let me bring back the panel. robert, let me start with you.z was smart enough to know there may have been a recording, so he clearly didn't fall into the trap of denying what he said. what do you make of it? >> he's just waiting for the inevitable. trump's waiting for this fight to happen with cruz. and it seems to be on the rise. >> let me check twitter right now. can we do that? >> you better check real donald trump. >> perry, this was inevitable at some point. they're both trying to win in iowa. >> even is already questioning donald trump's credentials. i don't know if he'll say it immediately, because we're seeing the cruz versus rubio fight right now. >> it is interesting how rubio wants to frame this argument going back to rubio here. but i go back, and anna, i can't -- we were talking about this a little more, but rubio looks like sometimes he's ce d'ing edceding iowa to cruz and i question that. >> you look at the difference on the democratic side, and hillary and bernie both are going there just about every week. certainly iowans know

let me down gently don't pretend that you don't want me our love ain't water under the bridge oh oh say it ain't so say it ain't so say it ain't so say it ain't so say that our love ain't water under the bridge oh say it ain't so say it ain't so say that our love ain't water under the bridge say that our love ain't water under the bridge [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: oh, come on! that's what i'm talkin' about! hehe "water under the b bdge." adele! "25" is on itunes now. and cds and vinyl. [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: my thanks to kelly ripa! [ cheers and applause ] adele! and the roots right there, ladies and gentlemen, , om philadelphia, pennsylvania. [ cheers and applause ] stay tuned for "late night with seth meyers." thank u for watching. have a great night. i hope to see you tomorrow. bye-bye, everybody.

prime minister: let me answer both of ese, my honorable friend. the second question is perhaps answered by something perhaps the whole house would join me, which is wishing the honorable member good health, given his recent illness, who normally is always at the foreign affairs select committee and always voting on a non-party basis on the basis of the arguments he believes in. where my honorable friend and i disagree is that i believe there is a strategy of which military action is only one part, and the clear answer to his question is that we want to see a new syrian transitional government whose troops will then be our allies in squeezing out and destroying the so-called caliphate altogether. we cannot wait for that to happen. the threat is now. isil daesh are planning the attacks now. we can't act in syria as we act in iraq, and in doing so, we can enhance the long-term security and safety of our country and that is why we should act. let me give way to the honorable member raymond. >> thank you for that change in terminology, prime minister, a

so let me engage the three of you.one, i'm going to go to you to make it clear that issues dealing with terrorism and any elements thereof are specifically and appropriately excluded under this legislation. are you comfortable with that? >> very much so. if indeed that's part of the ground from at least my personal view that this legislation is appropriate, given the post-9/11 changes that have empowered our national security apparatus to protect us in ways that i think are appropriate, it's important to exclude from the coverage of this bill those issues. and i think that's something we can agree on. and rather the construction provision that is in section six of the bill is perfectly appropriate to that end. >> i think it is important to make note of that. i'm on homeland security as well. america is obviously on alert. but we've always said since 9/11 that we would not allow fear to instruct and guide our interpretation of the constitution. mr. calabrese, there was a law school yale with the same name. do you have a

let me get that quickly.let me follow up with my other question, which is, when the prime minister was here, there was certainly an impression given, pakistan, that he was attempting to continue to build on democratic principles, focus on economic development, education, issues that we would be concerned about. and certainly existence, if you will, with india. so i'm wondering what your assessment is. if you would start with the status of the doctor, and then lastly, if you could give me just a little bit about afghanistan. i'm concerned in terms of whether or not the frontier land or the areas are even embraced by the central government, whether or not we actually have a functioning, tranquil, growing government in afghanistan. >> thank you, congresswoman. with regard to dr. afridi, we do believe there is no reason for his continued detention. we've been assured by the pakistanis that he is in good health. but we continue to press his case, absolutely, at the highest levels of our government and seek his rel

let me get that quickly. let me follow up with my other question, which is, when the prime minister was here, there was certainly an impression given, pakistan, that he was attempting to continue to build on democratic principles, focus on economic development, education, issues that we would be concerned about. and certainly existence, if you will, with india. so i'm wondering what your assessment is. if you would start with the status of the doctor, and then lastly, if you could give me just a little bit about afghanistan. i'm concerned in terms of whether or not the frontier land or the areas are even embraced by the central government, whether or not we actually have a functioning, tranquil, growing government in afghanistan. >> thank you, congresswoman. with regard to dr. afridi, we do believe there is no reason for his continued detention. we've been assured by the pakistanis that he is in good health. but we continue to press his case, absolutely, at the highest levels of our government and seek his re

let me come all the way to you. reporter: can you explain the rationale behind the feds taking over the case? i understand you're still look at a lot of things, there are still things you don't know, but what's the thought process of the f.b.i. being the lead agency? ms. lynch: we don't know the motivation. we don't know whether it was a terrorist act. we don't know whether it was a workplace rage act. because we can't rule anything out, the f.b.i.'s taking a leadership role. but i do want to stress that this is in conjunction with the local authorities. and with their cooperation. and they've been truly outstanding in this. we simply don't know. i will also note that, as is often the case in these investigative matters, we do not know where any charges may lie. these two individuals who were the shooters are deceased. we don't know if any others were involved. right now we're focusing on those two individuals. so at this point it is still an investigation, to determine -- although we know what happened, but why did

let me just ask you -- >> let me respond -- >> we did -- secretary clinton, let me just ask you -- >> let me respond very quickly. number one -- >> and in particular -- >> number one, there are currently two hedge fund billionaires running ads against me here in new hampshire. they started in iowa. now, you'd have to ask yourself me? and the answer is because they know i will go right after them, that i will not let their agenda be america's agenda. secondly, i think it's important to point out that about 3% of my donations come from people in the finance and investment world. you can go to opensecrets.org and check that. i have more donations from students and teachers than i do from people associated with wall street. [ applause ] now, number three, and let me say this. heading the democratic governors association, he had no trouble at all going to wall street to raise money to run campaigns for democratic governors. and he also had no trouble appointing an investment banker to be in charge of his consumer protection bureau when he was governor. so you know, again, the difference be

let me ask, why not? why not just arrest anybody who is misusing drugs and put them where they belong and call it a day? isn't that a more effective more effective strategy. >> no, unfortunately that is not the case. >> .. and so law enforcement across the land has had a paradigm shift and understand for that very reason it is a clichÉ now. can't arrest our way out of the problem, nor do they want to. addiction is a disease and needs to be treated however those that capitalizing benefit of the ones we are after. >> final question, you talked about budget reductions. can you expand on that and what the impact has been? >> the program has historically been very valuable and using the funding appropriated. we have in the past provided a very substantial return on investment. to reduce the program would put us back many years in the progress we have made. the language in the authorization -- >> have we reduced the program? >> no comeau we have not. >> you talked about a budget reduction. >> while he is checki

let me see. i'm coming out with my hands up i'm coming out with my hands up all of the trials it's only a test of being renewed >> i need y'all to get your hands up. let me see. how many of you really know? i'm coming up i'm coming up i'm coming out i'm coming out i'm coming out with my hands up >> come on. get them hands in the air. i'm coming out i'm coming out i'm coming out with my hands up i'm coming out i'm coming out i'm coming out with my hands up i'm coming out i'm coming out i'm coming out with my hands up i'm coming out i'm coming out five, four, three, two >> all right. come on, y'all. everybody, put your hands together. know you're coming out. don't let the level make you feel like you ain't coming out. come on, yes, you are. all of the trials that i've been through it's only a test of being renewed nobody knows the story i've got a right to praise him and i kick up my heels and i shout i'm coming up >> there's a saying that goes, the person who can bring the spirit of laughter into

let me -- let me give you a couple examples. a family in eagle river, alaska, $1,200-a-month premium with a $10,000 deductible for affordable care. a couple in anchorage will be paying $3,131 a month in premiums, almost $38,000 a year. here's an excerpt from a former constituent letter -- quote -- "the renewal paperwork that i just received estimated that our new payment to be just over $1,000 a month, doubling our monthly expense. what is a young family to do?" here's another constituent -- quote -- "there is nothing affordable about the affordable health care act." another constituent -- quote -- "insurance rates are killing my small business. we have tried to keep our employees and their families covered but we don't see how we can do it and continue to be in business." here's another constituent of mine. quote "please, please help us us." begging for help. teachers, construction workers, small business owners, self-sufficient alaskans, so many of them asking for help because of what this federal government did to them. madam

>> [indiscernible] >> let me begin by asking, your comments about speaker paul ryan. a divided government, you do not get everything you want. you disagree? billcruz: today's omnibus wasn't the trail. for

let. >> let me just check, i'm traveling somewhere and have a -- how am i doing? >>> i'm sorry, mr. hairman, there's another thing i need do. >> that's why i'm asking. >> but let's keep going. if i need to leave chairman dunford just indicate head would be willing to stay longer. >> that's taking one for the team. ms. gab board? >> thank you, mr. chairman, since our policy to overthrow the syrian government of assad has brought us really into a potential direct head-to-head military conflict with russia i have some important questions along this line. approximately how many nuclear warheads does russia have aimed at the u.s. and the u.s. have aimed at russia? >> congresswoman, i will give you those precise numbers as best we know them. i'm confident we have a strong, safe, secure and reliable deyou are the rent but it's true that russia, like the soviet union that precedes it has a massive nuclear arsenal. >> and it would be accurate to say both of our countries have the capacity to launch these nuclear weapons within minutes? >> we do. >> i've seen pictures, films and images from na

so let me ask you this. if the s.e.c. wants a box of documents sitting in a target's home, can you use an a administrative subpoena to bring a locksmith to their home to open the door, walk in and take documents? >> we cannot. >> so then please explain to us why you think we should give you the ability to do exactly that with the digital equivalent, how that could possibly come port with expectations of privacy and due process. and without a shred of meaningful evidence from you so far or anyone else that this -- that the lack of this authority will have any impact on your ability to carry out investigations whatsoever. >> we view the isp as a third party storage provider like an iron mountain provider would be for hard copy documents that are kept in a storage facility and if in the circumstance where hard copy are kept in a storage facility we could go to that storage facility with notice to the person who uses that storage facility and try to obtain the documents by a subpoena and that, i think, is the analogy that we

let me make some progress. let me turn to the question whether there will be ground forces a success. those who say there aren't as many ground troops that we would like, they are correct. we are not dealing with an ideal situation. let me make important points. first, we should be clear what air strikes can do. we don't need ground troops to hit isis health health headquar. it's clear air strikes can have an effect with the issue of khan and hussein. it can do serious damage to daesh and we should give them that support. >> i think the -- i thank the prime minister. how would the prime minister respond to the point that daesh since offensive against baghdad has actually changed tactics, dispersed courses and particularly raqaa600000 people all through that city into small units which make it attacks from tornadoes given the small number of tornadoes we have. >> that's not an argument for not doing something. it's an argument for using air strikes where you can but having a longer-term strategy to deliver groun

let me go on. look, between what the director said even yesterday-- look, if you talk to the folks in our national security community, the islamic state is using social media as a main recruiting tool. this is their game. this is their world. they are doing this all the globe and yet if we look at what homeland security is doing, we don't have a regular widespread requirement that our people review the social media of people coming from trouble areas where you have a lot of terrorists, places like pakistan, afghanistan, syria, iraq, tunisia, parts of north africa where you have got a lot of support for radical jihad, violent jihad and we are not reviewing the social media even though that is the world in which they operate and we don't regularly review that and that's major problem. so, look, i think if someone is applying for citizenship to the united states, is entirely reasonable that we ask for their social media contacts, their information. these people don't radicalize overnight. a lot of the

but with those articles let me ask you this. some the have commented the cfpb is vulnerable to hackers because of their heavy reliance on cloud based computing. cad you tell me how you feel about that? water better practices from the experience that would be better? >> if you talk to people at the pentagon. >> in your opinion. >> want to hear from you. you have shared you have this experience and you have been the most critical if i want to discern and separate if this is pre-disposed of articles i have kept out with ideas against the organization so keep this in the context to give me specifics that you have city year today not that they may call in the future. >> briefings. if you aggregate this kind of data you always have the potential to identify individuals and i can give you technical experts who would explain that. >> is a you don't have any that you can give me? if you are the real expert taking up my time. thank you very much. can you answer that question? >> our testimony focuses on the policy-making process without a

let me see that. hey, it's there. are you surprised? it's just that... scoot knows me as chang. skeet. whatever. whatever. check out the rock. laurie, about the rock. the ring mechanic called... and it needs to be realigned. the ring is perfect. you know what i see when i look into this ring? i see our future. i see our kids, i-- the man of my dreams. you see all that in there? don't you? let me take a look. oh, wow. look, there i am. i have no hair. so, stuart, how'd you get us into that party? i amaze you, don't i? stuart, i got us into that party, and, yes, you do amaze me. hey, how'd you do it? a friend of mine was helping throw the party, and he told me that you weren't on the list. wow. wow. busted. listen, stuart... you knew you could not get us into that party, and you knew you were gonna make an absolute fool of yourself trying to, and that's really sweet. yeah. so are we gonna sleep together, or what? that is definitely not a poodle named tiffany. that is a black lab named rex. look at us. i see us fighting over which dog to get. oh, i see me winning. no, i see me lett

let me give you another example. et us assume for the moment that i am inarticulate, i cannot -- stop laughing that's my son making faces back there. let's assume that i'm inarticulate, i can't get up before crowds, i don't really like crowds but i have very strong opinions. mark here however, is running for office and it turns out every one of the ideas i hold mark supports. now, i want to help him. anything wrong with that? if i give mark a lot of money, that's my speech. i am using my money to essentially get my ideas out. first amendment protects that. now the question you raise and one which i do not have a good answer for is when we get into these mega- quantities. and what to do about that. but, in terms of -- the book i wrote was money and speech. in politics it's the same thing, without without money there is no speech. >> just a quick question, you mentioned the current court is what did you say? a nasty court, can you elaborate on that and what effect that could have? >> up until fairly recently the court,

let me -- let me just explain. we knew of four or more individuals who our security people had been watching. the couple in san bernardino, it appears, were communicating with those people. but yet because of strong encryption, we didn't detect it. let me also say in the case of san bernardino, there were some red flags. people building an arsenal. neighbors who might have suspected something. we need to watch. we need to report. but encryption technology when people can hide in a playstation 4 or when they can use the encryption on our own phones to avoid detection has to be solved. but it isn't easy. because the minute you begin to solve the encryption problem by giving our security officials an ability to get in a back door, it opens the possibility for criminals to be able to use that same back door or those who want to harm us to use that same back door to exploit access to the n encrypted technology. so, what do you do? you sit down with people in the technology community, in the intelligence community, in th