let me turn. i said in the house last week was me say a little bit more about the nonmilitary elements counterterrorism and extremism, the diplomatic process and the vital humanitarian work my honorable friend referred to. it gives britannica breeds of plan to prevent and foil the plot at home and address the ideology that is the root cause of the threats we face and as a part of this i can announce today we would establish a comprehensive review to root out any remaining funding of extremism in the uk. this would be the major scale including any overseas sources. it would report to myself and my honorable friends and i will make this point before giving way again there are some that suggests military action could undermine our extremism strategy by radicalizing the british muslims. so if we take this head on, they are appalled and these women raping monsters are hijacking the religion of islam and as the king of jordan said in the article today, these people are not muslims, they are from islam an

pull over and let me out. pick me up later. i'll walk. >> i'll walk to hollywood boulevard. it's fine, i'll walk there. >> jimmy: did you ever want to change your mind? i know a lot of the girls -- >> when i was in -- when i was in second grade and everybody was calling me smelly kelly with peanut butter and jelly in her belly. [ laughter ] i was like, maybe i'll change my name. but it's just -- i'm too lazy. i got distracted. >> jimmy: yeah, and it works. now look at who has smelly kelly with peanut butter and jelly in her belly. [ cheers and applause ] it's live -- live with smelly kelly with peanut butter and jelly in her belly. are you psyched for thanksgiving? what are you doing? >> jimmy: are you gonna see the parents again? >> the parents are coming. mark's parents, my parents. >> jimmy: both parents. >> the nieces are coming. all the additional, like, my sister-in-law is coming, our friends who don't have family in the city, they're coming. >> jimmy: that's fun. >> yeah, it's fun. we always play -- do you ever play the white elephant game where you put all the presen

and let me quote him some data about the nhs. let he jume just take an arm da today compared with five years ago when i became prime minister. on an average day, there are 4,400 more operations. 21,000 more outpatient appointments. yes, they are challenges in a&e, but 2,100 more people seen within four hours today than five years ago. and there is more data published in our nhs than there ever was under labor. >> mr. speaker, there are huge pressures on the nhs, and they are largely due to the pressures on the adult social care system, which is under enormous stress at the moment, it indeed has been huge cuts in adult social care because of cuts in local government funding. simon stevens has called for a radical upgrade in public health. so would the prime minister agree with me that cutting these services is a false economy? >> we're increasing the money that's able to go into social care by having the it 2% pre-set on the council tax so local councils can spend more. but i notice that the ripe old gentleman the mentions simon st

well let me say this.s president i don't care if baghdad doesn't want the sunnis on the ground to be able to fight isis and help us destroy their training camps, we will supply, support, train, finance and help them have safe areas where they can mount their attacks on the ground against isis. [ applause ] and, by the way, if that isn't enough, we should send in american troops. send american special operation force, destroy their training centers. destroy their planning hubs. destroy their social media capability centers and then get out. not so that we can stay there for ten years but so that we can send a clear and convincing message to the world that when we say we're going to destroy and degrade isis over time, over time isn't in the next century, over time is in the next year and isis will be destroyed and degraded. [ applause ] now i don't want to sound like a militaryist but i know how important this is and i know what it's like to have loved ones in harm's way. i have two sons. my older sons when

let me conclude. this is not 2003. we must not use past mistakes as an excuse for indifference or inaction. and let's be clear, mr. speaker, inaction does not amount to a strategy for our security or for the syrian people, but inaction is a choice. i believe it's the wrong choice. we face a clear threat. we've listened to our allies. we've taken legal advice. we have a unanimous united nations resolution. we've discussed our proposed action extensively at meetings of the national security council and cabinet. i've responded personally to the detailed report of the foreign affairs select committee. we have a proper motion before this house, and we're having a 10.5-hour debate today. in that spirit, i look forward to the rest of the debate. i look forward to listening to the contribution of members on all sides of this house, but i hope at the end of it all, the house will come together in large numbers for britain to play its part in defeating these evil extremists, and taking the action that is needed now to keep our co

let me make progress. et me turn to the question of whether there will be grand forces to make this a success. aren't as ay there many ground troops as they like and they aren't in as many places are correct. we aren't dealing with an ideal situation. let me make a series of important points first. we should be clear what air strikes alone can achieve. to supply ed troops oil that funds terrorism. e don't need to hit the infrastructure and supply routes, their training facility, weapons supplies. it's clear, they can have an effect with the issue of kohn hussein. r.e.f. can do serious damage to aesh's ability right now to bring terror, and we should give them that report. >> thank you, prime minister. how would the prime minister that daesh he point since its attack on its ffensive of baghdad was blunted, has actually changed its tactics, dispersed its forces, and particularly, 600,000 people, at best its operations, all throughout that city, into small units, which to catch pervious impersonators given the

prime minister: let me answer both of ese, my honorable friend. the second question is perhaps answered by something perhaps the whole house would join me, which is wishing the honorable member good health, given his recent illness, who normally is always at the foreign affairs select committee and always voting on a non-party basis on the basis of the arguments he believes in. where my honorable friend and i disagree is that i believe there is a strategy of which military action is only one part, and the clear answer to his question is that we want to see a new syrian transitional government whose troops will then be our allies in squeezing out and destroying the so-called caliphate altogether. we cannot wait for that to happen. the threat is now. isil daesh are planning the attacks now. we can't act in syria as we act in iraq, and in doing so, we can enhance the long-term security and safety of our country and that is why we should act. let me give way to the honorable member raymond. >> thank you for that change in terminology, prime minister, a

chuck, let me just say this. let's be clear. >> okay. >> as a result of a breach caused by the dnc vendor, not by us, information came into our campaign about the clinton campaign. >> magically? wait? magically came there or you had a staffer that got it? >>yes, that's what -- >> you believe it accidentally came in. >> that's not disputed. there was a breach caused by the incompetence of the dnc vendor. that information came into our campaign. first titi it came in our staff did the right thing. they said "we have information from the clinton campaign, we don't want this." and they went to the dnc. the second time a staffer or more, we don't know yet, we're doing that investigation, screwed up and we have fired that person. point is the dnc then proposed because of the initial screwup on their part to take away our access to our own information which significantly hampers our campaign. resolved. >> all right, senator sanderss i'll leave it there. i know it was a late night, early morning. appreciate you coming on

thin air. >> but let me ask you this. if you knew your words were being used in recruitment videos -- because i've had intelligence officials worry about this, you're right, there's no evidence yet. if you knew your words were being used, would you change your language? >> no, because i think my words present toughness and strength. hillary's not strength. hillary's weak, frankly, she's got no stamina, she's got nothing. >> let me stop you there. >> she couldn't even get back on the stage. nobody even knows what happened to her. it's like she went home and went to sleep. >> why do you keep going on this? >> she couldn't get back on the stage last night i'll tell you why. because we need a president with great strength and stamina and hillary doesn't have that. president like we have right now. we need a president with tremendous intelligence, smarts, cunning, strength, and stamina. >> there's a lot of things i've heard about hillary clinton, the idea, though, she did travel more than any secretary of state, it's a gruelli

>> i think the answer is i'll know it -- and by the way, let me say, coming here to texas, the response has been extraordinary. we have had huge meetings and i want to thank the people of texas. and that tells me there is a lot of support for the agenda we're bringing forward. >> but you don't want to be specific about a timetable? >> not right now. >> all right, good. senator sanders, thank you very much. good luck whatever you decide, sir. >> thank you. >> thank you so much. [cheering and applause]. >> we'd love to have you join us in the studio. visit our website at klru.org/overheard to find invitations to interviews, q&as with our audience and guests, and an archive of past episodes. >> what is really disturbing, and i think an international embarrassment is the degree that virtually all republicans still refuse to acknowledge that climate change is real and caused by human activity and causing devastating problems. >>> funding for "overhead" with evan smith is provided in part by m.f.i. foundation, improving the quality of life within our community. and from the texas board of leg

let me show you this.ing to simmons research, here are the top ten places where conservatives shop. most stores are located in the south. here are the stores where liberals shop, mostly in urban areas. you'll notice not one store in the conservative list appears on the liberal list, nor one store on the liberal list appearing on the conservative list. a lot of this is geography but it shows you how we have totally sorted ourselves out. >>> we'll be back in a moment with the speaker of the house paul ryan on what he thinks he and the president can actually get done. (donkey noise) (elephant noise) (mic screech) there's a big difference between making noise... (mic tap) ...and making sense. (elephant noise) (donkey noise) when it comes to social security, we need more than lip service. our next president needs a real plan to keep social security strong. (elephant noise) hey candidates! enough talk. give us a plan. his day of coaching begins with knee pain, when... this is brad. hey brad, wanna trade the all

let me get that quickly. let me follow up with my other question, which is, when the prime minister was here, there was certainly an impression given, pakistan, that he was attempting to continue to build on democratic principles, focus on economic development, education, issues that we would be concerned about. and certainly existence, if you will, with india. so i'm wondering what your assessment is. if you would start with the status of the doctor, and then lastly, if you could give me just a little bit about afghanistan. i'm concerned in terms of whether or not the frontier land or the areas are even embraced by the central government, whether or not we actually have a functioning, tranquil, growing government in afghanistan. >> thank you, congresswoman. with regard to dr. afridi, we do believe there is no reason for his continued detention. we've been assured by the pakistanis that he is in good health. but we continue to press his case, absolutely, at the highest levels of our government and seek his re

let me ask, why not? why not just arrest anybody who is misusing drugs and put them where they belong and call it a day? isn't that a more effective more effective strategy. >> no, unfortunately that is not the case. >> .. and so law enforcement across the land has had a paradigm shift and understand for that very reason it is a clichÉ now. can't arrest our way out of the problem, nor do they want to. addiction is a disease and needs to be treated however those that capitalizing benefit of the ones we are after. >> final question, you talked about budget reductions. can you expand on that and what the impact has been? >> the program has historically been very valuable and using the funding appropriated. we have in the past provided a very substantial return on investment. to reduce the program would put us back many years in the progress we have made. the language in the authorization -- >> have we reduced the program? >> no comeau we have not. >> you talked about a budget reduction. >> while he is checki

let me come all the way to you. reporter: can you explain the rationale behind the feds taking over the case? i understand you're still look at a lot of things, there are still things you don't know, but what's the thought process of the f.b.i. being the lead agency? ms. lynch: we don't know the motivation. we don't know whether it was a terrorist act. we don't know whether it was a workplace rage act. because we can't rule anything out, the f.b.i.'s taking a leadership role. but i do want to stress that this is in conjunction with the local authorities. and with their cooperation. and they've been truly outstanding in this. we simply don't know. i will also note that, as is often the case in these investigative matters, we do not know where any charges may lie. these two individuals who were the shooters are deceased. we don't know if any others were involved. right now we're focusing on those two individuals. so at this point it is still an investigation, to determine -- although we know what happened, but why did

let me make some progress. let me turn to the question whether there will be ground forces a success. those who say there aren't as many ground troops that we would like, they are correct. we are not dealing with an ideal situation. let me make important points. first, we should be clear what air strikes can do. we don't need ground troops to hit isis health health headquar. it's clear air strikes can have an effect with the issue of khan and hussein. it can do serious damage to daesh and we should give them that support. >> i think the -- i thank the prime minister. how would the prime minister respond to the point that daesh since offensive against baghdad has actually changed tactics, dispersed courses and particularly raqaa600000 people all through that city into small units which make it attacks from tornadoes given the small number of tornadoes we have. >> that's not an argument for not doing something. it's an argument for using air strikes where you can but having a longer-term strategy to deliver groun

speaker, let me be clear. people will not return to syria if part of it is under the control of an organization that people, throws gay people off buildings, beheads aid workers, and forces children to marry before they are even 10 years old. so we cannot separate the humanitarian work and the reconstruction work from dealing with daesch itself. >> i think the prime minister for giving way. welcome his views about terminology. i asked the prime minister a question as a new memory of this house. given that the language being used would be considered , and for the benefit of new members, with the prime minister withdraw his remarks? david cameron: i think everyone is now focused on the main issues in front of us. the plan for to pro -- for post-conflict reconstruction. oneid we should commit to billion pounds for reconstruction. it would be for security, stabilization, and confidence building measures, including basic you military and needs, and helping the refugees to return. over time, the focus would shift to

[shouting] >> let me quote some data about the nhs. let me take an average day today compared with five years ago when he became prime minister, on an average there are 4,400 more operations, there are 21,000 more outpatient appointments. yes, there are challenges in a&e but there are 2 thousands 00 more people seen within four hours today than five years ago and there is more data published in nhs than there was in labor. >> mr. speaker, they are largely due to the precious on the adult social care system which is under enormous stress at the moment. indeed, huge cuts in adult social care because of cuts in local government funding. nhs has called for radical upgrade. would the prime minister agree with me that cutting crucial services is a faulty economy? [shouting] >> so that locals can spend more. i notice that the honorable gentleman mentions simon stevens, nhs for the first time got together and wrote their plan. they asked us for a billion pounds. they asked for the money up front and we committed to that plan unlike labour and

let me say this. as a member of the health education committee that helped write the affordable care act, much of what secretary clinton said about what we have done, among other things, ending the obscenity of this pre-existing situation is a step forward. this seventeen more million more people have health care. it is a step forward. a step forward. but this is what we also have to say. not only are deductibles rising, 29 million americans still have no health insurance and millions of people can't afford to go to the doctor. major crisis and primary health care. here is the bottom line. why is it that the united states of america today is the only major country on earth that does not guarantee health care to all people as a right? why is it -- [applause] mr. sanders: why is it that we are -- why is it that we spend almost three times per capita as to what they spend in the u.k., 50% more than what they pay in france, countries that guarantee health care to all of their people and in many cases, hav

let me down gently don't pretend that you don't want me our love ain't water under the bridge oh oh say it ain't so say it ain't so say it ain't so say it ain't so say that our love ain't water under the bridge oh say it ain't so say it ain't so say that our love ain't water under the bridge say that our love ain't water under the bridge [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: oh, come on! that's what i'm talkin' about! hehe "water under the b bdge." adele! "25" is on itunes now. and cds and vinyl. [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: my thanks to kelly ripa! [ cheers and applause ] adele! and the roots right there, ladies and gentlemen, , om philadelphia, pennsylvania. [ cheers and applause ] stay tuned for "late night with seth meyers." thank u for watching. have a great night. i hope to see you tomorrow. bye-bye, everybody.

let me get that quickly.let me follow up with my other question, which is, when the prime minister was here, there was certainly an impression given, pakistan, that he was attempting to continue to build on democratic principles, focus on economic development, education, issues that we would be concerned about. and certainly existence, if you will, with india. so i'm wondering what your assessment is. if you would start with the status of the doctor, and then lastly, if you could give me just a little bit about afghanistan. i'm concerned in terms of whether or not the frontier land or the areas are even embraced by the central government, whether or not we actually have a functioning, tranquil, growing government in afghanistan. >> thank you, congresswoman. with regard to dr. afridi, we do believe there is no reason for his continued detention. we've been assured by the pakistanis that he is in good health. but we continue to press his case, absolutely, at the highest levels of our government and seek his rel

>> [indiscernible] >> let me begin by asking, your comments about speaker paul ryan. a divided government, you do not get everything you want. you disagree? billcruz: today's omnibus wasn't the trail. for

let me see that. hey, it's there. are you surprised? it's just that... scoot knows me as chang. skeet. whatever. whatever. check out the rock. laurie, about the rock. the ring mechanic called... and it needs to be realigned. the ring is perfect. you know what i see when i look into this ring? i see our future. i see our kids, i-- the man of my dreams. you see all that in there? don't you? let me take a look. oh, wow. look, there i am. i have no hair. so, stuart, how'd you get us into that party? i amaze you, don't i? stuart, i got us into that party, and, yes, you do amaze me. hey, how'd you do it? a friend of mine was helping throw the party, and he told me that you weren't on the list. wow. wow. busted. listen, stuart... you knew you could not get us into that party, and you knew you were gonna make an absolute fool of yourself trying to, and that's really sweet. yeah. so are we gonna sleep together, or what? that is definitely not a poodle named tiffany. that is a black lab named rex. look at us. i see us fighting over which dog to get. oh, i see me winning. no, i see me lett

let me say that publicly. it was a very bad optic and looked horrible, and no way justifiab justifiable, and most americans looking at the that video would say that, but chicago has a much larger prob em l and systleprob problem, and for the mayor to let go of the police chief there he had to make a decision, and i'm sure that he had to think deeply on it, and it goes beyond superintendent mccarthy, because if fact that it took 400 days for this information to be exposed with a court order, and in addition to that, at the course of this investigation, and in chicago, if i'm not mistaken, they have independent civilian investigators who do police shootings, and so who all saw this video, and at what point did the state attorney there see it and had to say, wait, hold on a minute, will is something wrong in this video. that doesn't take 400 days to do. and that doesn't take that type of investigation, and so the questions that are being raised by the public are very fair questions, because the mayor is going to

let me through , please! let me through! mayor: oh, my! those are the most beautiful boots i've ever seen! that is the gift, papa! that is what i want for christmas! the red boots! uh, yes, of course, dear. then you shall have them. (bell dings) shoemaker? yes, mayor? how may i help you this fine christmas eve? oh, ho, ho. you are a sly one, shoemaker. christmas eve indeed. i do not understand, mr. mayor. "i have not made a new pair of shoes for quite some time, mr. mayor." (chuckles) you knew i would not find a gift as magnificent as these boots anywhere in friedensdorf, so you waited until christmas eve to get the price up. so, what is your price? i am sorry, mayor, but these boots are not for sale. they are a gift. a gift for my adelaide! now name your price. no! the boots are not for sale, not at any price! (gasping, mumbling) grrr... time to go! yes, i have lots of shopping to do myself. i think i left a teapot boiling. this is not over, shoemaker! i mean to have those boots! (door slams) i could not give up the red boots, aldo. they

let me finish. >> let me tell you where you're right and where you're wrong. >> do i get to actually speak now? >> larry: and it really doesn't matter what they're arguing. they just get paid to argue. so here at "the nightly show," we're jumping onboard the mindless argument bandwagon in a segment we call "pardon the integration." yeah. all right! yeah! ( cheers and applause ) please welcome our debaters, "nightly show" contributors. mike yard and rory albanese. okay. boys, you know the rules. you're both going to argue one side of an issue, and when the bell rings, you switch sides, proving that if you're having an argument on cable television, whatever side you're on is completely irrelevant. we ready to do this? now, rory, you're jewish. and, mike, obviously, you're black. ( laughter ) so let's start with a nice seasonal racial question: hannukah or kwanzaa, which is better? >> rory: as a jew, i'll admit hanukkah is kind of lame compared to christmas. if christmas is disney world, if christmas is disney world, hanukkah is definitely epcot center. >> same thing. but kwanzaa's like

>> first of all let me say this. i have a lot of support and confidence in the work and results that he has done. but our goal as i would say to you is to build the trust and confidence with the public. and at this point in this juncture for the city, given what we're working on, he has become an issue, rather than dealing with the issue, and it's a distraction. now i support, and i said it, and noted, the results of his work, 34% reduction bill in over the last four and a half years in crime. but we must get to that confidence and trust to build what i think is necessary, which is as i said towards a solution. >> reporter: mayor -- >> just a minute. sorry. i have a lot of loyalty to what he has done in him. but i have a bigger loyalty to the city of chicago, its future and the strength of that future, and no one person trumps my responsibility to the city of chicago and its future. i thanked him for his service, but we now need to make a move in both leadership, the commission, the body camries are all a piece of st

so let me engage the three of you.one, i'm going to go to you to make it clear that issues dealing with terrorism and any elements thereof are specifically and appropriately excluded under this legislation. are you comfortable with that? >> very much so. if indeed that's part of the ground from at least my personal view that this legislation is appropriate, given the post-9/11 changes that have empowered our national security apparatus to protect us in ways that i think are appropriate, it's important to exclude from the coverage of this bill those issues. and i think that's something we can agree on. and rather the construction provision that is in section six of the bill is perfectly appropriate to that end. >> i think it is important to make note of that. i'm on homeland security as well. america is obviously on alert. but we've always said since 9/11 that we would not allow fear to instruct and guide our interpretation of the constitution. mr. calabrese, there was a law school yale with the same name. do you have a

let me bring in mr.oolsey here because bret is right and we is should properly think of isis now paris and other attacks it seems to be right as a global threat and not a regional threat. how does that effect the way we fight them? >> we have to fight them everywhere and take them out in their homeland, that's crucial. the homeland of the caliphate in syria and iraq. and they also have to be fought here and in paris and wherever they show up. we can't just kind of rock back and leave them alone. i think the caliphate in mohammed's time expanded very, very rapidly, within 100 years of his death it reached from france to today's pakistan. and that's what they want. they think they should rule everything that was once ruled by muslims. d right away. >> let's talk some specifics. the pentagon announced this week that they are going to add 200 special ops forces. special operators to raid in both iraq and in syria as opposed to zero. i suppose that's a good number. is it anywhere close to what you think need?

great to see you. >> let me play the media. explain to me why people like me don't understand donald trump. what is it the media doesn't get? >> this is just human beingings. not eve not every interesting person is liked. you have the media whining because he isn't playing by their rules. these don't apply to democrats.s >> what's example? >> we didn't see coverage on cnn wall to wall when the administration came out saying they wanted to add biometrics to the vetting process. we did hear from for two weeks that donald trump wants a database for these refugees and it was insanity. we don't hear back to back on cnn about hillary clinton lying. she blamed an american citizen who made a video. we talked about a head count when muslim celebrated 9/11. i think that goes to show the dishonesty in media. >> you said muslims celebrated 9/11. don't you mean a small number. >> i mean radical muslims celebrating in america. >> how many? >> that video you were talking about in iowa. msnbc said that donald trump rou abruptly left the stage.

let me just ask you -- >> let me respond -- >> we did -- secretary clinton, let me just ask you -- >> let me respond very quickly. number one -- >> and in particular -- >> number one, there are currently two hedge fund billionaires running ads against memeere in new hampshire. they started in iowa. now, you'd have to ask yoursel why are they running ads against me? and the answer is because they know i will go right after them, that i will not let their agenda be america's agenda. to point out that about 3% of my donations come from people in the finance and investment world. you can go to opensecrets.org and check that. i have more donations from students and teachers than i do from people associated with wall street. [ applause ] now, number three, and let me say this. when governor o'malley was heading the democratic governors association, he had no trouble at all going to wall street to raise money to run campaigns for democratic governors. and he also h h no trouble appointing an investment banker to be in charge of his consumer protection bureau when he was governor. so you know

let. >> let me just check, i'm traveling somewhere and have a -- how am i doing? >>> i'm sorry, mr. hairman, there's another thing i need do. >> that's why i'm asking. >> but let's keep going. if i need to leave chairman dunford just indicate head would be willing to stay longer. >> that's taking one for the team. ms. gab board? >> thank you, mr. chairman, since our policy to overthrow the syrian government of assad has brought us really into a potential direct head-to-head military conflict with russia i have some important questions along this line. approximately how many nuclear warheads does russia have aimed at the u.s. and the u.s. have aimed at russia? >> congresswoman, i will give you those precise numbers as best we know them. i'm confident we have a strong, safe, secure and reliable deyou are the rent but it's true that russia, like the soviet union that precedes it has a massive nuclear arsenal. >> and it would be accurate to say both of our countries have the capacity to launch these nuclear weapons within minutes? >> we do. >> i've seen pictures, films and images from na