let me just tell you why this really matters so... ll me why, if we agree to all that, we would still, in effect, have left the european union. andrew, you asked me about what other than a free—trade deal we're talking about here. let's remember why those nontariff and indeed tariff barriers really matter to our business, let's go back to 2001... no, mr farron, that's not what i'm asking you. well, let me finish this point... it's an important question, and i'd like you to address my question, which is that if we remain members of the single market, we'd be subject to the european court, we would need to agree to free movement of people, we would have no control over our borders, so therefore in what way... you're making lots of assumptions here. in what way would we have left the european union? let's answer that question, then i'll go back to your first one. well, that was my first one. the important thing is this. we are currently in a situation negotiating our exit and a new deal, absolutely essential that we have a new deal going

see your part let me just. let me jump in here jeff you've listen to the republican and the democrat as a libertarian please my friend. go ahead hey i like that crosstalk but look i'll tell you what we could save a few trillion dollars right off the top by just getting the hell out of a stand in iraq how about we start there ok and ask for obamacare look why does all this stuff have to be top down why can't different states have to provide it like california have single payer which by the way it can't seem to budget because it's going to cost forty billion dollars but let california try it and i hope i hope it works i don't think it will but why does california and montgomery alabama have to have the same rules for everything in this is this is this this is the story that the twentieth century and now twenty first everything is federalized folks we're not there's more deplorable is out there than the democrats thought ok their program their doctrine of inevitability is going to take a lot longer than they thoug

>> let me just comment. tax reform is a pass/fail exercise, okay? and we're going to get this passed for a plan that's good for the american public. so we are working closely with the house and the senate and we're goings to get a bill great for this economy, great for americans putting people back to work. [ overlapping speakers ] >> how is it possible -- funding source for the health care to lead to lower premiums and expanded coverage? >> again, i'm here primarily to talk about sanctions and tax reform, but i will comment again on health care although it's not my primary area. the health care that's been in place is a bad deal for the american public. that's why a lot of people aren't using it. okay. it was a giant tax hike to the american economy, and premiums have been going up a ton. so we're looking at making the system more competitive so people can actually afford it. >> sir, we heard from your counterpart at homeland security that airports all around the world have to step up aviation security because there's this threat. this is the produ

be clear of adults let me finish let go of the data and the layout of this is. probably the biggest mistake that the hillary clinton campaign made is that forgot about the the fly over states and that's what made the difference in the election here and i think what we see here this invention of russia gate here i mean it is a scandal without evidence there's we have no smoking gun i would submit if i go to line right now if there was something after all these months it would have been leaked by now because everything else has been leaked go ahead lionel. there is nothing let let let let let me rephrase something the reason why c.n.n. there's a problem let's go back step number one it was when anthony's kero mood she was involved in a story and c.n.n. went through great pains to to bring this down to strike this and to expurgated from its rolls fearing a suit why because of an eighty five billion dollar merger between time warner and eighty in t. were it not for that nothing would change on c.n.n. nothing this is not abou

currently enrolled in medicaid no one will be quote thrown off medicaid as bernie sanders was apparently let me ask you this little bit about process senate well the republican party criticize the democratic party for passing obamacare in secret party line vote without letting the other side participate in the process and now it appears they're doing the very same thing we'll ever see anyway to pass a bill that affects one sixth of the us economy tell you what's happening we have to pass a bill because obamacare is collapsing millions of people especially in states like iowa where all the insurers have pulled out face the prospect of not being able to buy coverage but is this the way you do in people explaining let me just explain give me a minute. so mitch mcconnell knows he's the senate majority leader that he has to get a bill to the floor but chuck schumer and the senate minority leader has sworn resistance obstruction right sabotage and so the senate republicans want to draft a bill they're going to release it in the next twenty four hours there will be as mitch mcconnell has promised unli

let me make two points. first, i think what happens as you describe it is offensive. those that know that for me to use those words it means something. it is offensive. we have scoured the law for auctions internally on how to address situations like those. unfortunately our hands, our ability is limited. there is in addition to the larger bill that i'm aware of, there are some very simple fixes. that's $60,000 threshold in the area. you know, it's interesting because congress talks about and i talked about and responded to questions with respect to overtime and others. i said life gets more expensive. when you have $1 threshold it should be updated over time. congress has not update that had threshold over time. if congress were to update that simply for inflation it would bring it up to well over $80,000. many if not most of the situations like that you have identified would be eliminated because they would not be below that $60,000 threshold. and so perhaps when it was enacted way back when it was an appropriate threshold. i would encourage them because i can't imag

i think we can do better. >> let me assure you again, our objective is more trade, okay. as i like to say i wen to my first g 20, it was 19-18 against me over this trade issue. as i like to explain to people we are the most open market, the largest trading market, anybody could investigate here. anybody who wants to have reciprocal trade on the same terms as us, we're all for that, bring it on. as it relates to your mandatory spending, the president has made it clear that on social security that's not something he's addressing now, but if congress wants to review that, obviously that's within your prerogative. >> okay. of course we need a partner in the white house who'll work with us on those, we understand that might not be the priority right now, i actually support that that prioritizing is not something i'd disagree with. strategically long-term that's got to be something we can take that on. we've got to push 'administration for working with us maybe not now but later on. thank you mr. secretary. >> i yield back. >> it's important that we have some nba finallies here

let me ask you another question. president trump campaigned on the fact that he was going to take on wall street, he supported a 21st century glass seeing it he will act, that's what he said during the campaign put just recently introduced a report on wall street reform. you can tell me where i could find the establishment of a 21st century glass steegel act? what page might i find that at? >> first of all, let me comment that i think, as you know, i had the pleasure of traveling the country with the president during the campaign. i met with hundreds an hundreds of small and medium-size businesses. during the campaign we specifically said that we believed in a 21st century glass steegel. that was differentiated from what was the republican party view of glass -- >> well, let me get this right. >> i don't mean to interrupt. >> you are interrupting me you're not let egg me finish my dment. >> but i have very limited time and what you're saying is the language that trump put into the republican platform is not really th

let me go to spread and let me go to see if steve you know it seems to me the media is looking they want him to have a goal they want him impeached and removed so they're looking they're searching for it they're doing it everything upside down ok that's not defending donald trump it's defending the presidency and the constitution and the democratic process that apparently russia is is roading i mean it's complete fantasy it's they're doing it to themselves go ahead steve. they're absolutely doing it to themselves and the fact of the matter is unified was anybody know in this country or in this world based on the reporting from c.n.n. and the others that bernie sanders and his wife are under f.b.i. are under investigation criminal investigation does anybody care about any other story also c.n.n. is twenty four hours donald trump now look this as i said has started their goal their goal and i predicted this on the air many many times if the democrats take the house donald trump will be impeached and he won't be convicted in the senate it'll go the way clinton i had to jump in here guy

let me say something here, you're asking me if i had a conversation, which i have not had, about robert mueller with the president of the united states, i could not and would not discuss that with you. unlike james comey, who leaks information to the press, i actually respect the attorney/client privilege. apparently, he did not. chris: well, you're speaking for

that was differentiated from the republican party view of -- >> let me get this right. i don't mean to interrupt you. >> but you are interrupting me and you are not letting me finish my comment. >> the language that mr. trump putting in is not the language that he believed in. >> the president did not put everything in the republican platform. there was the republican platform and there was the trump's position which i was involved in and i had the pleasure of speaking to senator warren about this when i testified several weeks ago and i followed up with her in her office and had a personal meeting with her and i ex mplaid to her of the difference of what we had thought of the 21st century of glass eagle and made it clear of my last testimony in fr front of the senate that the president did not support breaking up the banks. we think that'll hurt the economy and ruin the liquidity of the market and what we are focused on is safe and imprudence -- >> the trump campaign reinstated -- >> no, it did not. we differentiated and we were clear as i have said to senator warren.

go to jeff i think we got jim can i just jump in and say let me go to let me go to jeff because we haven't heard from him and we have some problems of the connection here jeff i don't know how much of you heard there but i mean what what michael just said made sense what david said makes sense but what we heard for the last six months last ten months russia russia russia russia will turn on c.n.n. right now i mean there they have they're totally red faced right now right now with this revelation that they're producer talk to. baritones so ok but i bet you anything in their first five minutes i could be talking about russia so they're not listening to david they're not listening to michael go ahead jeff. well i agree it's not a left and right thing it's really a populist versus elite thing and the thing about trump's victory is that it really shook up progressives in a way that they weren't ready for it psychologically damaged them and so they've been lashing out ever since trying to find the issue of the day that's going to bring trump down in flames and now that the russia issue d

hold on let me let me stop you there and why would this harm our ability to fight isis as an isis also an enemy of saudi arabia it is and yet at the same time we need to have g.c.c. gulf cooperation council unity in order to effectively prosecute that and our primary base in the goal for the united states is in our day the air base in qatar and right now that's been essentially cut off by saudi arabia and so when scotter and saudi arabia and united arab emirates are at loggerheads and they don't have the unity we can't fully rely on our gulf partners to execute a war that's not just military but it's going to require significant efforts to combat terror financing to deal with isis propaganda but we can't have them fighting with each other we need them to be on the same page so do you think that m.b. asked as he's known and he's only thirty one years old i believe he was educated in saudi arabia never in the west surprisingly a lot of the royals are educated in the west do you think that he'll be moving saudi arabia into the twenty first century when it comes to women homosexuals you kn

tourist dollars at work and i'll be calling you on july seventeenth about what we did with that dead let me appreciate it thank you so much for joining us thank you very thank you for joining me on this edition of politicking and think you are to larry king for letting me sit in this chair it's an honor remember we love hearing from you join the conversation on larry's facebook page and as always you can share your thoughts on twitter by tweeting at kings things and using the politicking hash tag i also got you to join me on twitter at real amy holmes that's all for this edition of politicking. about your sudden passing i've only just learned you worry yourself and taken your last wrong turn. you're out caught up to us we all knew it would i tell you i'm sorry i could so i write these last words in hopes to put to rest these things that i never got off my chest. i remember when we first met my life turned on each breath. but then my feeling started to change you talked about war like it was again still some are fond of you those that didn't like to question our ark and i secretly promised t

let me make two final points. as the senator acknowledged at the beginning, this is a discussion congress has from year to year. and it's something that i'd be committed to working with the committee's staff on because it is important. and i do recognize from my visits with so many members of the committee, the importance of these centers. and so i don't thing this should be a unilateral, but i do think it needs to be part of a more fulsome discussion. >> well, thank you, mr. secretary. thank you for your and your team that has been here today. the record will stay open for one week for additional questions. and the subcommittee stands at recess. >>> c-span's washington journal live every day with news and policy issues that impact you. coming up wednesday morning discussing the latest on the postponed senate health care law replacement bill. be sure to watch c-span's washington journal live at 7:00 a.m. eastern. >>> u.s. ambassador to the united nations nikki haley testifies. she expected to discuss issues such a

let me just ask some clarification. you brought up about this $1 billion increase in title i funds dedicated to furthering options for children to unlock success. the question came out and you alluded to it earlier how is , this different than race to the top? and there was concern from this dais that when president barack obama was putting in race to the top, it was really a requirement from the federal government -- if you want these dollars, you have do our curriculum, do it our way. and if you don't do it our way, you can't get the dollars that came out of your state to come back to your state. how is this different than race to the top? betsy devos: so the proposal is very much voluntary on the part of states. it is only if states want to and local education agencies and authorities want to attempt a, an experiment really to allow students to attend other public schools in their region. it is in no way going to be mandated from the top that this has to happen. in order to do so, there has to be money to follow the

capitol welcome senator congressman thanks for joining us i appreciate it nice to be with you so let me pose that question to you as a former congress person sitting on those committees do you believe that we are striking the right balance between security and civil rights well i think we have to be conscious of the balance but let's just remember we had three airplanes that had passenger in it and it used as missiles to to attack the united states brought down six buildings in new york city it was a crime that was committed that we could have it was a terrorist act that was committed that we could have prevented had we done a better job in and keeping track of potential terrorists and what the patriot act does and what other acts do is to try to bring a balance. let's remember these individuals by their were not american citizens and i believe most if not all were here illegally yes they were they were actually eventually deported on immigration violations you bring up the patriot act of course there's a lot of debate about it particular when it comes to an essay surveillance do you th

you know i think it's let me let me just make this point when you're on an airplane you pray for the pilot i don't want him to fail i want our government to do well i would like him to succeed doing constructive things but you know when he flies a plane to the right and to the left and up and straight down you get a little nervous and i'm nervous yet so in order for him to do the right things as you're saying he also needs a cooperative congress and so far we've seen the democratic party being very obstructionist when it comes to trying to work with republicans on obamacare for good assholes trying to reform that so you know what needs to happen there are you surprised when he goes to a convention and he encourages people to you know walk or up block or up i mean people are going to start to say about half have to put on their big boy pants too and get to the you know but let me. make my point my point is he can't complain about this when he was so active in doing the very things that democrats were doing so he's he's a misguided voice when he complains about it because he set the to

let me make two points. first, i think what happened as you describe it is offensive. and those are strong words and those senators that heard me speak for me to use those words it means something. and it is offensive. we have scoured the law for options internally on how to address situations like those. and unfortunately our hands are -- our ability is limited, but there is, in addition to the larger bill that i'm aware of, there are some very simple fixes. there's a $60,000 threshold in the h-1-b area and it's interesting because congress talks about and i talked about and responded to questions with respect to overtime and others and i've said, life gets more expensive. and so when you have a dollar threshold that should be updated over time, but congress has not updated that $60,000 threshold over time. if congress were to update that simply for inflation it would bring it up to well over $80,000. and many, if not most, of the situations you identified would be eliminated because they would not be within that -- they would be below that $60,000 threshold. and so pe

c that's a good thing. >> let me ask you this. id not occur to me initially when i checked out the film of the new project of kamil. but it occurs to me -- >> do you know kamil? >> i don't know him. >> i love the story though. >> the story that you guys tell me are beautiful. i did not think about this initially when i first saw this. let me just ask, there maybe nothing here but let me ask anyway. this film as i said moment ago is about a man and a woman who he more than she trying to navigate this cultural difference of relationship. he knows what's expected from him and his parents is in an arranged marriage and his mom and dad would not be feeding this white girl that he's dating so he's trying to figure it out. that's the story. that story can be sit waituated this moment politically and certainly, there is push back by the president on muslims. when you are reading this and filming this, did any of this feel like -- >> no. >> this was before trump. >> yeah >> none of that was in play. of course, there is prejudice in this cou

let me ask you another question. president trump campaigned on the fact that he was going to take on wall street, he supported a 21st century glass seeing it he will act, that's what he said during the campaign put just recently introduced a report on wall street reform. you can tell me where i could find the establishment of a 21st century glass steegel act? what page might i find that at? >> first of all, let me comment that i think, as you know, i had the pleasure of traveling the country with the president during the campaign. i met with hundreds an hundreds of small and medium-size businesses. during the campaign we specifically said that we believed in a 21st century glass steegel. that was differentiated from what was the republican party view of glass -- >> well, let me get this right. >> i don't mean to interrupt. >> you are interrupting me you're not let egg me finish my dment. >> but i have very limited time and what you're saying is the language that trump put into the republican platform is not really th

love you ♪let me give my life to you ♪let me drown in your laughter♪ ♪let me die in your arms ♪letet me love you ♪come love me again i'm alejandro escovedo. you may not know there's a link between certain viruses and cancer. i found out when i was diagnosed with hepatitis c. i learned that up to 65% of all liver cancers are caused by hepatitis b or c. that's why i've partnered with the prevent cancer foundation. getting screened, vaccinated, and treated isn't scary. but cancer is. think about the link between viruses and cancer. to learn more, visit thinkaboutthelink.org. . lou: in our online poll last night, we asked you does your week seem all the better because the dems, the globalists and the enviro left are having a lousy week? 95% of you say yes, it does, which means we're being, well, petty together, and we thank you. joining me now, founder and coo of american majority ned ryun, republican times columnist fox news contributor tammy bruce. good to have you both here. tammy, start with the president and the withdrawal from the paris accord. tammy: yeah. lou: how nice is it to

let me clarify. i haven't been investment banking in over 15 years. i've been focused on regional banking. i know the mortgage and so we are a 100% committed and i can assure you in my job, we are 100% commit today make sure that americans have access to mortgage capital but that they can afford those mortgages. and as it relates to the voeker rule, people don't do proprietary trading within the bank but outside the bank but withholding companies. our objective to fix the voekert rule and that's what we are working on.ou'll .. mortgages back into the marketplace. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> mr. chairman, thank you for being here. i think i may be the only thing between you and lunch so i'll be direct. i want to go back to your earlier comments today talking about growth because i know the administration has talked about that. and the purpose of the growth, we have a $20 trillion debt. you refer to that earlier. >> yes. >> what we aren't talking about is unless we do something now to this baseline

love you ♪let me give my life to you ♪let me drown in your laughter♪ ♪let me die in your arms ♪letth you ♪come let me love you ♪come love me again lou: a few thoughts on what has been a topic for president trump. department of homeland security secretary john kelly offered strong words today for opponents of the president's policies and priorities. general kelly slammed lawmakers for choosing politics over public safety. >> dhs does not make the laws, congress does. we'll enforce the laws passed by congress. i'm offended when members of this institution threaten me and my officers to ignore the laws they make and i'm sworn to uphold. lou: did you notice speaker ryan standing behind general kelly? house republicans have been slow to act on immigration reform. despite passing kate's law and no sanctuary for criminal act today. there is zero chance it will be passed in the senate. make no mistake about it, the republican majority leader in the senate can change that rule to a simple majority with the snap of his fingers. but democratic obstructionists are blocking a vote in the senate

let me be clear. thank you for that question. >> the republicans and democrats can fix it. >> absolutely. that's what we had hoped president trump would want to do from the start instead of sabotaging it. some of the ills of it are because of the republicans when they took power not renewing some of the things that were in there. and any bill that is passed, you see implementation and you know how you can improve it. but these bills systemically, structur structurally, they're very harmful to the benefits. i have annage tax. if you're 50 -- nobody here, of course, under 64, they'll undermine medicare. they'll throw millions of people. tens of millions of people off of it -- >> is there anything in the republican bill that you think you all can work with sth. >> no. >> nothing. >> structurally, no. >> willingly -- >> it's not a question of willing. structurally its undermines medicare in the long run. >> if this bill passes and goes back to the house, can it pass in the house in. >> it depends. right n

let me be clear. president trump supports trade. he supports free and fair trade. but free and fair trade is reciprocal. free trade is not, i don't charge you a tariff, and you charge me 25%. that is not free trade. we are working very hard. we want to grow exports, not shrink imports. secretary ross and i are leading a comprehensive economic dialogue with the chinese. we had a very good discussion at mar-a-lago. we have had several discussions since then. i think you may have seen the announcement that we opened up our markets to beef, although that will much change the trade deficit alone. it is a significant start to something that is important to our farmers. so, let me just say we are very focused on these issues and we appreciate your comments. >> thank you, mr. secretary. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. secretary, a fact sheet from the president's budget discusses improper payments stating, "while the majority of government payments are proper, any waste of taxpayer money is unacceptable." i agree with that. the special inspector general recently found a cont

in british politics let me go should be the choice in going to go to stephen here stephen let's say corbin became prime minister would what we now is popularly called the deep state let him rule would he be just undercut left and right like what's happening across the pond in washington d.c. you know what i'm getting at go ahead stephen. i do yeah well it's unlikely that he will become prime minister certainly without another general election the has to be no the general election that labor just doesn't have enough seats there aren't enough seats to put together to form a coalition so that's not going to help without another election. and with another election i think some of the paradoxes of the contradictions within germany called his appeal may become may on rival if the concert is get a new leader with a different approach. but yes it's always the fear amongst the left when tony benn of the one nine hundred eighty s. was riding hard there was always the fear that things would go roy if there was ever a left labor government we don't know that i would have happened because that h

. >> let me bring jeremy bash into the conversation because he was shooting me notes about the piece before my eyes were open. jeremy let me ask you process the cyberbombs ov also approved a the covert measure thorsoned wanting weapon in bz snnz the russia as infrastructure process digital equivalent of bombs that could be detonated if the united states found itself in a escalating exchange with mosque. moscow. the prajts which obama proufrd was still in planning stages when osh left office. it would be up to president trump to decide whether to use the capability. what's your hunch on where those conversations about this tool might stand in this administration? >> no where. i mean my sense nicole is that this dprgs is not taking tough action against russia. they are letting russia have their way with regards to their ambitions vis-a-vis ukraine, threatening nato. the administration did not invoke article 5 in brussels recently. we've effectively loutd russia to have a no fly zone in the person part of syria. of course we've invited lavrov and kizlyak into the oval office and told th

let me give you a little excerpt from his article here. the natives of this characterized of the frame, so here he's saying he's focusing on the mountain people himself. now he's starting to say they're different. in this case they're different from other americans. the elongation of the bones. the contour of the facial angle. the relative proportion or disproportion of extremities. the loose muscle and harsh features were exemplified in the late president lincoln. like the individual appeals in their idiom which is prekul yar to the mountains. a couple of important things here. first he is saying that these people are somehow different, in this case, physical different than other americans. but he also compares them to who, abraham lincoln. so here he's comparing them to a hardy frontier, what he's saying is these people are different, in the end they're good old honest abe. they're frontiers. they do live like our contemporary ancestors. but they have -- they're a noble race of people that's going to be able to achieve civilization. so a

let me step back a minute. of course, when the fbi seeks electronic surveillance collection on a u.s. person, we go to the fisa court and get a title i fisa order to do so. if we have an open, full investigation on a foreign person in a foreign place, and the collection is for the purpose of collecting foreign intelligence, we can nominate that person or that, as we refer to it internally, the selector, whether an e-mail address or that sort of thing, we can nominate that for 702 coverage. we convey the nomination to the nsa and they pursue the coverage under their authority. >> you'd be the person who would pursue coverage for a u.s. person hereto here on outside of the united states? >> that is correct, senator. >> you or the fbi. >> we are the u.s. person agency. that's right. >> admiral rogers, senator feinstein mentioned that last year, 1,139 u.s. persons were -- the phrase we're using now -- unmasked for some purpose. is that a number you agree with? >> it's in the 2016 odni-generated transparency report.

let me have some clarification. you brought up about this $1 billion increase in title i funding dedicated to furthering options for children to unlock success. the question came up earlier. excuse me. how is this different than a "race to the top"? there was a concern from this that when president obama was putting in "race to the top," it was a federal requirement. if you want these dollars, you have to do this curriculum, our way, and if you do not do it our way, you cannot get the dollars that came out of your state back to your state. how is this different from "race to the top?" sec. devos: this proposal is very much voluntary on the part of the states. it is only if they want to attempt an experiment, really, to allow students to attend other public schools in their region. and it is in no way going to be mandated from the top that this has to happen or how it has to happen. other than that, in order to do so there has to be money to , follow the child to the other school. answer, that is really the framework

let me make sure i jotted them down. the first issue on the tax gap, i can assure you that i am very concerned about the tax gap. the best way to address that is to simplify our tax system, which is way too complicated. we are -- the overriding feature of our tax reform, i refer to it as not just a tax cut, but a tax reform, is broadening the base and simple find it so that the irs administer the code. believeust say that we in a business tax, not just a corporate tax. our engine of driving growth in this country with the benefit of a tax -- share tax rate. i share your concern. one of the things we are hard at work, we have over 100 people working in the text department on this to make sure that we set so that pastors cannot be used for the wealthy to dodge means of are not a somebody who should be paying 30 percent -- 30% paying 15%. on filling positions, i can assure you that we have filled almost every single position. the fbi background checks are what have -- the last part, we are researching and spending time disc

let me speak up. i had a great list but i hope we start making headway into a lot of these difficult problems we have, especially as we get into the summer. in the summer, garbage get stinky. we worked really hard to d conflict our remarks. i wanted to briefly share my personal opinion about three things to stimulate discussion and q&a. first i wanted to talk about russia's concept in their improving capabilities at the theater level. second i wanted to talk about how it's viewed in russia and third i wanted to talk about the importance of arms-control and i know that's an issue that is near and dear to a lot of you here. first, russian military thinkers have been working for over a decade on the cost of strategic deterrence, i think we've seen a lot of writing calling this thing coercion and a lot of other things, but i believe personally using russian terminology for this is very interesting because it's also not what we think of as strategic deterrence. this idea is essentially a blend of deterrenc

learn, ♪ ♪ and laugh and cry and love, ♪ ♪ and it's okay. ♪ you give me all the love i need. ♪ ♪ you let me you, always on my side. ♪ and after all this time, i still know you will be. ♪ ♪ and now, you're still my best friend. ♪ ♪ you, you showed me how to believe in me. ♪ ♪ you showed me that it's possible to live and learn, ♪ ♪ and laugh and cry and love, ♪ ♪ and it's okay. ♪ you give me all the love i need. ♪ ♪ you let me know you're there for me. ♪ ♪ and i can see it's true. ♪ feel like i could touch the sky. ♪ ♪ like the wind, i'm flying high. ♪ ♪ no one's gonna bring me down, ♪ ♪ no one's taking what i found. ♪ ♪ i got so much more in me, yeah, yeah. ♪ ♪ come on, you, ♪ you showed me how to believe in me. ♪ ♪ you showed me that it's possible to live and learn, ♪ ♪ and laugh and cry and love, ♪ ♪ and it's okay. ♪ you give me all the love i need. ♪ ♪ you let me know you're there for me. ♪ ♪ and anyone can see who i am is you. ♪ ♪ oh yeah, is you. ♪ da-da-da-da-da-da, da-da-da-da. ♪ ♪ who i am is you. robert: tim atlas and maddie b. be sure to check out their latest projects. now, when w

jake, let me go back to you. of the issues that we now know, the president was never under investigation. there is no collusion whatsoever as it relates to russia. and then it the question, why are we even in this situation, where there is no collusion? >> we are in the situation because, unfortunately, and i think this is a real travesty, we are acting like this started when robert mueller was appointed a special counselor. this is been going on for ten months. all of these witnesses have come forward, including democratic senators, intelligence officials, who say we see no evidence of collusion. james mueller said that. no collusion that he could tell. then he leaked the memo. i go back to that memo leak. here's what you got to think about this. he has a private conversation with the president of united states. his capacity is the director of the fbi. he then goes to his car, which is an fbi vehicle, goes to his fbi computer, and types out a memorandum which he puts on his fbi desk. he then gets terminated and

love you ♪let me give my life to you ♪let me drown in your laughter♪ ♪let me die in your arms ♪letcome love me again charles: house minority leader nancy pelosi warning that hundreds of thousands of people will die if this republican healthcare bill passes. so much for cooler heads prevailing on capitol hill. we discuss it now. amy, on friday hillary clinton put out a tweet about maybe 20,000 dying, is that number exploded over week to hundreds of thousands of people. this sort of hyperbolic stuff that we've become accustom to but not helping. >> hyperbolic and apocalyptic. warren saying they are paying for the cuts with blood money, because so many people are going to die, they are trafficking this language they used before donald trump was elected. it is the end of the world if donald trump is elected. it is still turning and he is president. it is ridiculous, they are not purposely kills thousands of americans. charles: people don't understand that obamacare is in trouble. premiums have gone through the roof, it so hard to find good insurance for employees. but they broke out th

let me bring in the panel. let me put up something you wrote today. is it embargoed? we'll break the embargo. >> so sensitive. >> but you basically call out republicans for their hypocrisy. the big attack against obamacare, no one had read the bill and now they're in a position that they harshly criticized. republicans rush to vote on obamacare, they have come under criticism for exactly what they decried and hurrying toward a bill that hasn't been read. you go on to detail how little they know about it. >> yeah. i think they'd be better off taking their time. let's have a debate. maybe they can improve the notion -- right now they have let donald trump define the house bill as mean. >> theirs is not enough heart. >> and it's a bad debate to have. i think you're better off letting it go for a while. maybe a case for the -- make a case for the bill. but on the previous reporting. a zero chance that mitch mcconnell was surprised by the four conservative senators coming out. i mean, mitch mcconnell is very savvy. by noon, mitch mcconnell is -- it's not dead but it's wobb