we did inform the miss guidance we look forward to other examples at the federal, state and local levels to see how they're looking accident sea level adaptation and we're looking at the support from a couple of the coastal support to develop a detailed document that is adapted and in the process of being implemented as a result if you're into this guidance is if so a reminded for all the capitalized departments for the capital plans so, now i'm going to hand this off to tanya and she's going to describe the details of how this document works. >> president fong and members of the commission i'm tanya with the planning department and the environmental planning dwooigs division overwhelming i'm going to go over the main components first i'll talk about the science of the guidelines. >> the guidance draws on the best funds this is the research titled sea level for the california and oregon that was released in 2012, the energy report provides this projection for the sea level as well as the ranges that is the high and low conditions extreme conditions so as you can see the most likely proje

. >> commissioners that places you on item 13 sea level rise presentation. >> does the commission want a test. >> good afternoon and welcome to the for january 15, 2015 commissioners we left off under your regular calendar for the san francisco capital sea level rise presentation. >> good afternoon commissioner fong and commissioners chris i'm here are the environmental planning and colleagues going to give a a recent adapted guidance document for the sea level will adaptation into the plan for the city. >> so essentially our presentation is going to give a little bit of background and the purpose of the document the members of the committee that created this document then tanya is going to do go over the document in a little bit of detail for the planning process and the implementation and going to show you some sea level rise somewhere maps. >> so the guidance document was prepared at the direction of the mayor out of the larger sf adapt program and the objective to really incorporate sea level rise into the city's capital planning process as well as to improve the consistentcy acros

investment can you explain why level one level two. >> fossil fuels i should tell you my background i've spent a fair amount of time in the environmental area i've actually worked with conservation and traveled around the world drive a prius it's an important issue i've hit hot spots and gone into african to have micro loans i've been involved in that area the reason i actually study i sent the motion to go to level one on top of that i asked the staff to look into number one what the environmental foundations are doing that we have two of the top environmental foundations in the bay area the gordon foundation which my husband worked at and i'm sorry to interrupt we have minutes in the meeting you voted against supervisor cowen's motion to implement level one and two engagements you voted against that but you approved the motion to study why you choose to study versus the actual engagement. >> engagement because it's important as fossil fuels have many, many degrees of harmful areas than fossil files as you and i talk i talked about i'd like to take the steps like maybe coal and thi

environmental planning and colleagues going to give a a recent adapted guidance document for the sea level will adaptation into the plan for the city. >> so essentially our presentation is going to give a little bit of background and the purpose of the document the members of the committee that created this document then tanya is going to do go over the document in a little bit of detail for the planning process and the implementation and going to show you some sea level rise somewhere maps. >> so the guidance document was prepared at the direction of the mayor out of the larger sf adapt program and the objective to really incorporate sea level rise into the city's capital planning process as well as to improve the consistentcy across the departments how we think about and respond to sea level rise the committee was formed to include all the members of the capital planning committee and the agencies so puc and dpw and mta port and airport as well as the planning department and the capital department were on that committee and one of the initial tasks we did inform the miss guidance we look

so this floor plan is a plan of the second level on top of the podium building. and some some of the main items that i wanted to point out on this plan are the community room and the lapped the landscaped podium so we worked initially we had a smaller community room at the top of the podium and we worked with ocii to enlarge the community room and also kind of have it become more of a part of the landscaped court yard and so there will be some glass windows and when when i show you the rendering in a couple of slides you will see the visual connection being made between the community room and the court yard so it feels kind of more comprehensive and more of a common space rather than separated between spaces. on the on the left-hand side of the landscaped court yard you will see what looks like a little, you know, circle, that actually is where we're proposing to put some play equipment and just some community uses for the residents and additionally, right below the community space is where you will see some tables and chairs for eating so there's going to be a v

okay >> sue hester i didn't bring the maps about this sea level rise and based on on state and federal i've given them out it's important to look at it this map this map shows it's on page 8 at the bottom the big area south of market which is central selma is the marshy area you needed to look at the mashes the map you've seen is the three includes a lot of file downtown it ends just north of the bay bridge so i can because i've been digging into this is virtually the entire area east of 86 montgomery street down to market street is you'll file it's all file and you need to pay attention it's downtown area of the mashes includes the vast easier south of market and when you have an earthquake you see where the areas are mashes are no one was on the planning commission at the time of the one i don't know of anyone at the planning staff vast areas south of market had flooding filed with destruction and people died people died there as well as in the ronald reagan it got the news because if of the upper class people people that were homeless lost their lives i know there were there were fl

we would have to have double sets of doors at a low level and high-level. so that is the customization that would be different than the emu today. that is where we would have to look at trade-off maybe to have an internal lift, when you make the adjustment later on. so the difference is that we would have to be adding extra doors then to do that 50. you can't get a vehicle today that is just 50" and serve the platform today. or if you did, it would have to have -- i don't know -- but that would have a huge stairs that would be is very, very steep. so we're looking at the different car builders to figure out what we can do today. >> answer to the question comes to the platform transition. >> okay. the third question that i have and i think my colleaguess have questions as well. the question of the capacity. so i understand that caltrain wants to go to bilevel and sorry i'm asking so many questions, i'm trying to understand from an engineering perspectives a layperson, what the factors are in the decision? so at you have looked at the seat differential? >> ye

as the of previous levels, however more funding for the preparedness as well as the fund interested to see p how that plays out at the state level it turns out that public health preparedness is also under fund we're interested in supporting any efforts that addresses that as director comparingcy mentioned it could entitle resident to medi-cal the distinction it will be paid for state the governor will have a lot to say about 3 the previous executive action a president obama did a couple years ago did allow a new more young people undocumented young people to be on medi-cal by it took the department of public health almost a year to get that approved at the state level a bill offers full medical despite the documented folks the bill has been reintroduced and in general health care financing issues will be medi-cal reimbursement this year marks the end of the increased medi-cal provider payments under the ac a in the governors budget that will be something to watch the ada realignment it they may or may not revisit it based on the parents we'll be watching that and the state is plann

not the process but the step to getting united states to the process moving to the next level soliciting the comments as well as you going out to so many different groups to get their gutter is helpful but one of the things we're lucky enough to have part of the technology world that we have new opportunity for outreach and i know we'll be engaging those how to get more people a engaged in our processes and be more one of the themes or comments even from our critics was that traditionally the port has been essentially stronger in seeking the public comment in our promotions we'll continue to do so we've had a couple of projects but overall a reputation has already been very strong and i know we'll take advantage of the technology we have before us and want to participate and make sure that our commission stays involved in helping to develop the processes to we can be inclusive as a city as possible i really liked i made note one the comments i actually liked a line that came from one of the comments the word is out and i think this really sums it ulcer up the word is utility about our wa

those are the pipe columns up from the bus, from the cast node to the park level to the bus level so if you look at the proscwekt that's the finished height plus the park on top and that material but now you have a full bay completed of that steel and in the eastern form it's rebracing, lower concourse work, lift of walls. we placed the lower concourse pour into the eastern zone this month. as far as structural steel fabrication these pictures just give you a sample of what is still being fabricated. these columns are are made up here in vallejo. the group had success with the group in vahey low which is a small business and gave them more work so things are going well for the local workers as well as around the country as the executive director pointed out. the kaftd node -- the key is 209 have been delivered for use. there are other statistics about the number that relate to the like columns completion and the structural completion but everything is tracking to the end of the first quarter, second quarter completion of foundry work and the bug stops and the progress is the demoliti

>> to study level one. >> no. >> actually, we pulled up the notes you haven't read the notes correctly i've seen them verbatim and when it came to a vote on february 9th you weren't present at the meeting according to my notes and february 9th vote was on level one engagement which - >> colleagues. >> can the director speak. >> i have to make known we have folks from the retirement board so if folks have questions dork housing authority. >> there was a vote in october to study it and special meeting called in which the lady was present and seconded the motion if covered the carbon vote under the boards social policy one meeting in which not a successful vote of the board to engage and special meeting in february which she was he present and in fact seconded the motion and voted in favor of the motion. >> okay. thank you i have in my votes different from that but. >> i think on the main point the intent is that i've actually made extra efforts to attend and be involved in that it's an area that was per mixing i went with another person the kennedy are big advocates we were other n out i

you see a level of $12 and run up to the 2008 level of $140. you draw your lines on the february retracement levels, you come up with $42. that matches up pretty much where mike is talking about. that's where you readjust and take a look. >> thanks a lot for that, mike. check out the 5:30 "options action" on friday. tomorrow night, we're very excited about this. we have a very special show. it is "fast money's" eighth anniversary on the air. >> get out of here! >> come on. >> ringing the closing bell here at the nasdaq market site. and we'll have all eight traders on the show for the very first time ever. each will give their best trading idea right now. if that's not enough, we also have carl icahn and vice chair michael burns. both will join us for live interviews. it all starts tomorrow at 5:00 here on "fast money." very special day. >> have we been together longer than "friends"? >> are we still friends? >> we've got your first read tomorrow when we come back. stay tuned. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 [ male announcer ] your love for trading never st

we are talking about long-term exposure, low-level accumulative affect. thank you again. >> i do think this is the nature of the directors report. it is not a regulatory hearing where regulatory body. but i would like to get information back from the department of public health, third-party monitor and what are the responsibilities of those agencies and entities to get a sense of debate, do they become a partner or can we enlist their support in cementing a dialogue kinda bridging the gaps between the community and lennar. i'm interested in what they can do. does that make sense? >> yes. the representative could not be here today to participate in this discussion but we would be glad to facilitate the discussion with lennar dph in the community constituents to make sure the dust control measures are in place. and certainly the communication, if there is room for improvement. >> if i may, we are already working on setting up that meeting with the public health department, lennar and members of the community set up through golden gate university. >> thank y

on the issue the plan is provided to the lobbyist so they know what to work at the state or federal level the plans are developed with entity from the experts throughout the year we track the issues we gather the information and in december 2014 we held a policy forum where policy experts from the department could provide input from the draft plans as well as highlight the emerging issue from the perspective action their covering a board range of issues and that are drafted by the lawmakers at various levels in your packet you have the draft plans so i won't go over the plans in detail but highlight some of the major themes as well as hot topic issues we'll be following throughout the year into state and federal legislators have reconvened some bills will take white to get through some issues we track and support fall within the basic themes at the state and federal level we want to support the affordable health care act and sustain the safety net systems and we are interested in maintaining or funding for communicable disease control and perspectives we are land use & economic developmen

this is an example of how the rolling, rising sea levels problems into the building code, the planning code before these buildings are bit, if they're necessary, is very important. it saves money and livability for the people that will be living there. also in the response initially the city has repeatedly said that ceqa authorizes the city to mitigate and adapt, but it never says they actually do that and i was wondering if anybody knows of any projects in the city where the authority to mitigate for rising see levels has actually been used because i don't know of any. the warrior stadium is going to be in michigan bay, which is a flood zone. will the permits be released and signed or whatever without these mitigations. it seems a shame it's very short term thinking. also i noticed that fema met with city officials for rising sea level workshop in september and i was wondering what those results were. also one more thing, mr. chiu was representative from the city to bcbc and i was wondering, since he's now gone if there will be a replacement for the bcbc. i wanted to remind you they h

and you can see the goals and at least, 50 percent of the new entry level positions. and we have met that, and the goal, with cpmc and we have actually done quite well there. a couple came through the office as internships and were placed there and very strong candidate and we have done quite well there. and then the next is for the apprentice program, which is how we with the city bill worked to get a lot of new folks in the pipeline there. and at least, 50 percent of the new entry level, apprentice ships which was our goal and we have met that and we have filled all eight in that, and apprentice ship role and so when you go out on the sight, you can see our city bill efforts there and really paying off. and the, other thing that i would like to say, on the construction side that has been important, is that the staffing for the construction to make this happen, on cpmc side, on their contractor's side, was exceptional and that is how we have been able to exceed the goals and one of the staff that is working on this project, actually used to run our city bill academy

that's what i have been saying at the staff level because that's what i am referring to. we provided staff level comments on the report and i summarized those on the report to my commission on tuesday. >> okay. great. just sort of moving on are there -- i always talk about going forward. are there plans to bring back kim malcolm now that we have some sort of forward looking documents? >> so kim malcolm took leave. it was at her request. we granted it and it expires on january 31. >> okay great. and then if either ms. malcolm or someone else was engaged or some preliminary weights can be set as -- you know, a suggestion to the commission to the puc that they can start to begin to think how these would compare in these areas for cleanpowersf so that we can just start moving forward. i mean it sounds like the enernex report is a path forward and i want to see we're not stalling things with waiting on a meeting. i think on the staff side creating some of the suggested rates or preliminary rates could be a way that we could move the ball. >> so the enernex report provides good

disstressing to people hadn't step forwarded in the pension like new york and areas like that and gone to level two or three so i feel we need to find out why that's the case but i would vac advocate that i think it's a good idea and again, you don't move forward rationally you need to have beneficial results you can take little steps and move forward and we couldn't be at the for front of that. >> i'm hearing from staff you were not present at the february 19th meeting to be able to second the level one you may have seconded the vote for studying that's my original question and my staff is bringing the notes i want to make sure we're accurate about what happened i'm trying to work on the original notes that came from the minutes from the sf meeting so i feel like what i've been told put before me is accurate. >> there was one special meeting yes, we're 56 that with the commission secretary a special meeting at the health commission. >> i actually didn't attend that meeting i was out of town i wanted to attend that meeting. >> so we'll confirm that with a confirmation. >> i wanted to attend tha

risk some difficulties that hud -- for example, hud requires that our co-ops maintain at a certain level and when those maintenance needs are not met then hud find them in default, we run into some difficulties and the city gets involved to try to resolve those particular issues, but eventually it costs the city money. i know that's part of the mayor's portfolio, but as well build null it is important that we make sure that there is some clear maintenance component that's a part of maintaining these properties so we build them and because we know we're going to -- just like a house or places where we are building other properties they're maintained. there's usually an hoa and money invested in maintenance so we're not experiencing some of the situations that we are experiencing now with some of our dilapidated units and some of our public housing developments. i think it's important as we build new and as we look at ways to be creative that we think about long term maintenance because that will save us more money in the long run. secondly, it is important to think outside the box, which

population that needs to make trips to downtown or assess south bay that was our focus in the high-level analysis to engage in the fdr we hope after that report as marie said building upon a lot of work that has the forward initiate not trying to reinvent the wheel but backing take a birds eye approach as we we can further want to take public transit to the various locations i think this will be insightful for us we hope to gain a set of recommendations after this so it is not just study it is put aside but actual items to approve our transportation system thank you. >> thank you. i'm glad you went down that path it was hopeful helpful this was a bridged document taking the things we've done down sunset the transit unreliability calm as a concern and the works we've done through our san francisco transportation plan we have the goez graphic disparities and you have to keep in mind that people make rational choices and those are the occupant automobile trips reflect the liability and the quality of the caltrain transportation available to them so the way the san francisco board of directo

polarization is very strong at the state level as well as the federal level, but there's some interestings. there's much more unified government at the state level. you have 30 states now which are entirely governed by one party and those unified governments are overwhelmingly republican right? so the 30 after the recent election, 23 are republican, and this means that what you're seeing is the obama administration, if it's going to get the states to do something at the state level is going to have to be negotiating and compromising with republican-led administrations, republican-led governments which are often quite ideologically opposed to these initiatives. and which, in addition i was getting some studies of documents at the state level, republicans have been getting a lot of pressure from the national level toeep the vertical ideological line and stick to it and not compromise. so you get a lot of big impact with poe or lahrization at the state level and implementation. but there are also interestingly, more occasions of compromise and bipartisanship than we're seeingt the federal or

that is done at the federal level and we're talking about possibly doing that at the state level as well. >> commissioner. >> thank you very much. it was a very comprehensive report and ambitious agenda. one observation and one question, i was very happy for you to raise the use of elder financial abuse and one thing that is important to notice it covers all socioeconomic levels. yesterday's new york times carried an obituary, who was convicted of elder abuse concerning his philanthropic mother. he and the lawyer were convicted of physically abusing her, as well as financially abusing her. and they were at the most prestigious levels of new york society. so it crosses all lines and it's very important for people to remember that. secondly i have a question regarding the california death with dignity. is this in lay terms along the lines of physician-assisted suicide. >> yes, that is the initiative, exploring something similar to what the state of oregon does. >> thank you. >> i have one comment, is that commissioner roy is now on serving on that legislative committee. so be sure to make

the terror alert level in that region has been raised to the highest level. level was in and around paris. now to the north, to the region where this is going on. atika shubert is standing by near there and will alert us. >> she mentioned there's a wooded forest area obviously of great concern to authorities on the ground. so the killers in paris have done more than just murder cartoonists, they've managed to galvanize a nation. about 30 marches are planned tonight across paris, a sign of support for the people of "charlie hebdo" magazine. large, large crowds gathered in the rain to pay their respects at times all you could hear were the bells of notre dame. >> what was particularly moving to all of us here in the studio as we watched this happen as the silence ended, that crowd broke into thunderous applause very moving moment. our cnn international correspondent jim bittermann is in paris. we've been seeing the resilience of the parisian people also exhibiting online and in newspapers around the world powerful expressions, support and certainly the resilien

sometimes in a district or corridor level this is an opportunity to stand back and look at the long-term future of san francisco through the lens we've developed i want to begin by acknowledging a capable program management staff in the citywide division their seat behind me ask them to stand a moment to be acknowledged i've been really, really fortunate to inherit this bright dedicated group of planners in the distribution i want so is we've k4r5ubd as a groip group we've having had to think about the work we do and be aware of the voices in the community that are not represent in the planning discussion and find a place in the long term as well as invoke that resident response in anyone we talk to what we believe ♪ their hearts in the future of the city it's through that lens we've duplicate that we've engaged the entire citywide staff through the series i myself have had a number of the conversations throughout the community justify and embellish the work program with that in mind you have materials in our packet we've amended those slithering i'll point out the changes i have extra c

so, we have to reduce them to some level. frankly, we'll also reduce the readiness of our units conducting these missions. i >> thank you p.m. some of your testimony you discuss the importance of sustained investment and cy technological infrastructure w and as we know that cyber warfare is very much upon us.hrea so, for what you can see in this forum, with the increase threat ut of cyber warfare cue address the potential impacts to our cyber security capabilities should sequestration come into play in 2016?is, bu >>t if i could -- we've increasedfr spending in cyber, but we have a lot of infrastructure kind of ou things we have to do in order toa better protect our networks thatng better protects our nation. and that's going to be pro owned. last year at the end of the year we were hoping for about $800 million. we werecr hoping to improve our ot infrastructure particularly aimed at increasing cyber security. unfortunately, it wasn't do approved. because of thatr that puts more strain on the dollars we'll havepl available ov

for that transition period acknowledging that the transition to level boarding at a higher level at each station will take many years to accomplish. it's not going to be a one year or five year effort. it's going to be a 15, 20 year effort to accomplish that so we need a fleet that can accommodate that transition and we believe this base vehicle gives us that opportunity and what we're having the conversation with the industry about and we're confident based on the initial conversation with one of the manufacturers and follow up conversations with the industry to land on a successful outcome. that's really all i have to add. i am happy to answer any questions. >> director reiskin. >> yeah, thank you for the presentations. i am glad to hear there are meetings happening. hopefully they're leading toward the outcome that's going to get us to platforms and that can be shared platforms because at the risk of reiterating how essential that is particularly for this facility, the utility of the facility would be significantly degraded if we don't achieve that so i am glad to hear we're movi

whether or not it was seconded by the lady if she was not at the meeting it wasn't to engage at a level one so the information we're having that verified she was not in attendance. >> again, i actually there was an original meeting at our board it was a while ago i remembered standing up and saying i'd like to go to level one but really like to move a step forward and find out the environmental foundations are doing if they're not doing it we need to understand why if we have a $17 billion foundation the biggest in the world we need to know why a that's why i advocate to understand why it didn't maple we demanded take a step forward but i'm not against doing the process and moving forward in the process. >> i appreciate that i do want to make sure that the work that the sf has already done towards deinvestment can continue and you're able to take some leadership to a greater stent so folks on the commission have taken as far especially with your expertise that you have and the relationship i have in the that the firms are looking for investments as well. >> that's something you can - >>

to test this level. think what shocks the market most about it at the same time is a retest of the 200 day. i think we're heading to the 1965 level. now if we test it and break it to the same magnitude we did in october that brings us to this level right here. 1877. that's where you check your score cards and check and readjust to see is this market breaking trend or is it going to be another four-day event like we saw in october? i think we're going to break trend so be careful here. >> jim, is that -- does that mean that you better prepare yourself for a correction? >> let's talk about -- >> beyond anything that we've seen in recent memory of the 3, of the 4, of the 5% variety. >> right. so let's put this all into context. what we've seen so far in the last couple years, 3, 4, 5% corrections if you want to call it that. a 10% correction is not bad. that means buckle your seat belts. that means if you like your stocks and i agree with you 100% on old line technology, but maybe and steve to your comment

the talent level is phenomenal. or we start to lose them as when they become disconnected in her duties when i get to the midcareer with what the rest of the air force is doing. they don't feel they are critically important to the big air force. they feel they are critically important to the program and not having that connection is a big problem in my view. we have a number of general acquisition officers so there is a path for them if we can make them want to stay long enough to enjoy. it's tough work and you have to be very talented to do it well. .. >> is that fair to say? >> yes. >> capacity is small. >> yes sir and what percentage of gdp will we spend on defense. >> i believe it is about 3%. >> i think it is 2.3. can you do me a favor and check amongst your selves? finally a number that the military abuse that this is relative to the gdp? and also add into that letter the average that the nation has been spending on defense, let's say since vietnam. i think that that would be very instructive to the committee

on the sate level, if you can't even find negligence, how do you get to the level of intent. lot could come out of it by way of perhaps reform. i think it's a matter of trust. if you have independent investigators it's fine. remember that the federal investigation is quite different in terms of the standard that you have to show, intentional deprivation and beyond a reasonable doubt. very high. >> i hear you. that standard is critical that wilson would have had to have intention to violate brown's civil rights. paul, is there anything in this case that the feds might have found that would suggest that wilson is a bad man and did the wrong thing and that michael brown was innocent in all of this and yet they couldn't go ahead with any kind of -- >> well, no. i and would have to disagree with joey jackson's analysis about the difficulty for the feds. they had two ways to go. one, could they show the officer was a racist. had he said racist things. there was no evidence of that. obviously, they couldn't go on that grounds. addressing what joey had to say about intentional depriv

it could change significantly but when it was done we looked at at a simple level zero means average and the subway alignment of columbus and pals us by the one we looptd going all the way around to different streets and going lower with the surface alignments a couple of ways it was elevated we looking long term versus paying a little bit less up front but you have a issues of traffic and impact to the neighborhoods that's how we did that and lower lettering level the two lines are the cost in the report that come out creating came out 83 and at the bottom the higher the number the more or easier it is to constrict it is feasible but if it scored a 5 it looked like an easier job so this is our concept alignments to so you can see what we've been talking about xhumz u columbus on the left and powell on the right and over in the one way loop so what are the next steps on the project okay. we're the blue arrow that slits off we're going to put out a final in january of next year and it is feeding into the transportation plan led by the transportation authority and feeding into a projec

. >>> we begin with breaking news, high levels of carbon monoxide force residents from their montgomery county apartment building. just few doors down, similar problem will force several businesses to close today. we're live with details. >> first, though, we are tracking some snow, and a bitter blast. live look right here at storm scan3, showing the system that's bringing flurries this morning. and it is what's behind this that's going to bring a blast of arctic air. it could make for messy morning monday. >> today is friday, january 20th 30th, good morning, i'm ukee washington. >> right over to katie for the forecast for today and the week end. >> good morning, ended up with certainly a system that was coming through as advertised last night it, brought some very very modest snow, did i actually hear you say so did it actually snow last night err dismay. >> i saw it. >> it was so, so minor what ended upcoming through our area. actually want to take you out to a camera, too and show you our shore shot, not a lot of anything happening. that's what we expected so we did sort of dodge the

the bank of england looked through the higher level of oil. will it look through the lower level? >> oil prices very difficult to predict. it will be the biggest game changer for airlines and companies around the world. in an exclusive interview ahead of greece's general elections the country's finance minister tells bloomberg that an exit from the euro is not impossible. he was speaking with our reporter, elliott gotkine who joins us from athens. >> good morning to you, francine. he didn't seem particularly worried about many things, the finance minister. he seemed quite relaxed when we spoke to him in his office in athens. whatever wins these elections, he may be doing less stressful things than being financester. he didn't seem perturbed about the possibility of a greek exit from the eurozone. he thinks that even if they were to win, they would not do anything too crazy. >> responsibility transforms whoever runs the country. so i assume that rationality will eventually prevail. the question is how quickly. and greece doesn't have much time. there is a deadline of february 28. o