my name's stephanie levey, by question was originally intended for greg, but feel free to jump in the if you have anything. how do you build standards that are realistic for unmanned systems and law enforcement to current law enforcement and technology? we've had a lot of talk this week about the difference between human error acceptance and the idea being if you're going to have an unmanned system doing the same job, there needs to be zero room for, um, error. do you think that that, um, disparity's fair for what you guys are trying to do in if law- in law enforcement? >> you still directing it at me? [laughter] okay. to answer your question, yes. is there room for error? and i'll just take an example, and i'm not going to mention manufacture. we had a demonstration probably a month ago. they came out to our location and flew their unmanned system, great system, everybody was very impressed. um, i was actually talking to my uav coordinators telling 'em, hey, i want redundant systems, i want safety, safety, safety. right at that time we looked up, the two company operators that were f