and from a libertarian or free-market perspective, perhaps toing, expanding capitalism transform theorld on a trans political level. that was certainly the hope that wriston had. and in some ways this resonated me -- resonated with me deeply when i was starting paypal, and had a vision that we argan to lead -- that we are going to revolution, a libertarian revolution from central banks and go to control, to this trans political level to transform things. there are qualifiers on this. [indiscernible] all right, i will slow down a little bit. i have a lot to say, though. [laughter] there are times when this sort of transformation does not work in a libertarian direction, and the global scale can be different. think of margaret's biggest mistake. she thought in the late 1970's that embracing the eu would be a way to crush the unions in the u.k.. so you went to a trans political scale to bring about more free markets in the u.k., and a decade later she thought of this as her worst decision ever, where the free trade of the eu brussels that regulates everything from the size of bananas on

those are all libertarian issues.e your yes or no questions but the reason i am running, the reason i am involved in public. [inaudible] kennedy: i want to make this clear because i love libertarian i'm a libertarian but i'm not a member of the libertarian party. i will say this i feel the libertarian party for a lot of politicians it is a barfly. so you have gone to various clubs and restaurants and you haven't settled on anyone, and so the libertarian party is like a two. in the sea of sixes and juergen settle for the two because she couldn't make it with the democrats or the republican seven. >> 2020 is a different year we have donald trump, he is the most controversial president ever. the democrats have a field they can't seem to settle on any one candidate there's a lot of different issues with the progress is going it's the moderates can be very different year. [inaudible] >> it's the war with iran. kennedy: so what differentiation bernie sanders who voted against for the iraq war in 2002? >> we will see if he w

matter crosstalk in the trump report card i'm joined by my guest soraya foss in austin she is a us libertarian presidential candidate in new york who crossed the line and he is a legal and media analyst also in new york we have in williams he is a journalist and author as well as a senior analyst at foreign policy in focus all right cross talk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate it lionel let me go to you 1st here in a nutshell give donald trump his report card because the primary season is upon us here i must say his opponents are not something that i would be too worried about but an incumbent president always does run in this case his record so judge that record given a grade a plus plus plus and also if i could curve if i could weigh in the fact that he has been absolutely or they have attempted to stop him to do you rail him to indict him do impeach him to to to interrupt everything he has done from the moment he announced in view of all of that and the aforementioned he is in my lifetime greatest president i have seen he will win in their w

whether that is libertarian economics against more libertarian social form, the defense of the individual freedom especially in personal life, sexual life and so forth so that we really divided the world a tween two kinds of liberalism. one is a special place to the market. one is to the state. in many ways, what this debate has ledie us to believe is this spans the possible views of what should constitute normal politics. since i publish the book, it seems that all of those bets are off. we are seeing a frame of reference outside of that. what had been the settled debate within the frame. now what is being debated as the frame itself. i am spending this semester in london. the debates taking place in europe with the rise of populism. trump here inni the united stats all indicates that within the liberal democracies there is a question of whether or not the liberal assumptions are themselves viable. >> self-government is ailing. >> you could say that. one of the things that liberalism did not support was the conception of self-government. the freedom of individuals from each other. that m

libertarian party, we're going to be talking to the head of the libertarian party in a bit.oleimani, but they don't think the president should be an imperial president and just assassinate people whenever he feels like it when there's not an imminent threat. also, the american conservative magazine, also, they're not mourning the loss of soleimani, but they're very concerned that an imperial president is going around assassinating the number two person and not the government who, yes, is a terrorist. i think he's a terrorist. the majority leader is just sounding stupid. i never thought we would get to a point where somebody defended a terrorist. gumby, why are they defended the terrorist? how stupid are you? don't be that dumb in public, okay? save that for the cloak room, all right? that's just stupid. most disgusting one -- by the way, nikki haley, how shameful. >> i agree. >> how disgusting, nikki haley. nobody is mourning the loss of soleimani. and the democratic party that i've seen. if they are, shame on them, but certainly not nancy pelosi. but collins, the fast talki

new hampshire is third-party libertarians. libertarians love this stuff.e win iowa, we win new hampshire. i become president a year from now. the democrats and aggressors are so thrilled to have beaten -- progressives are so thrilled to have beaten president trump, let's pass his bills. what will republicans say to the dividend? the state that passed the dividend, alaska, was passed by a republican governor. most conservatives do not mind economic freedom in people's hands. they detest a giant bureaucracy making decisions for people. you can imagine people who represent rural states that got blasted by automation like wait a minute, do i not like the dividend? we pass it. this unfamiliar feeling of the government doing something you actually love. [applause] is doable. if you go through the numbers, ia m -- i am the heaviest favorite to go against donald trump on betting odds. one survey said 18% of college republicans would choose me over trump. you know who has figured this out? trump and his team. trump tweeted about every candidate except for me, becau

greg: cat you are libertarian. i don't know if this is a violation of libertarianism. i think it's moving towards a different phase of how we deal with adversaries. >> i have concerns about this obviously this was a bad dude. he was a terrorist and he deserved to be killed. obviously that's true at the same time it concerns on it based on what happened when we took on gaddafi and there were additional problems but the difference i think that's what i always think when something like this happens where his people on the left obama/hillary did the exact same sort of thing and they didn't have an issue now but they have an issue now because it's from. if trump would have done this they could have easily turned around and said look at trump telling around the terrace. no matter what they did they would have a problem. he deserved to die but i'm concerned about potential vocations because i'm a very antiwar person but i'm consistently so and i feel like a lot of people are against it because of something the trump did. obama did the same kind of thing. greg: tyrus close it

after 1991, what is holding a libertarian and a social conservative together? there is not much. i think conservatives consciously use the reagan legacy and they did it the wealth to bring these disparate conservatives, or people on the right to gather to keep them in the party. i think it was largely successful until around 2016. do you have a question in the back? sounds great. thank you guys so much. [applause] schiff this -- >> this is american history tv. exploring our nation' pass every week -- every weekend on c-span three. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2020] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] railamerica, we feature photos of the soviet union in the 1950's shot by martin man half while he was stationed at the u.s. embassy in moscow. historian douglas smith explains. here is a preview. 1950's majorly mark man half was stationed in the soviet union. everett -- an avid photographer, taking hundreds of color slides. in the sovietfe union including the onl

it actually is exploiting things like libertarian philosophy and religious philosophy to actually changey people think about punishment and undermine the punishment bureaucracy. seeing mostly ploys to reinforce the punishment bureaucracy c. at the end of the day we have to be very careful with the kinds of coalitions you're talking about. make no mistake, most of the conservative criminal justice reformers may have been persuaded somewhere along the way that especially if there libertarian that the criminal legal system is out of control. and completely ineffective and something to be reckoned with. at the end of the day most democrats and republicans supplies to mainstream democrats and more standard libertarians and republicans used to those people are fairly happy with our society it looks. if there was a choice between radically dismantling and abolishing the system and keeping our society mostly the way it looks they will choose the latter every time. if you are theory as we need a radically more just society that looks really different from its in terms of who owns things and then

brian and i were classmates in law school they are more libertarian. to write a book in support of class-action complaints. [laughter] thank you for that kind introduction. the reason i think conservatives should support class actions is because we have to ask ourselves what the alternative is. the alternative was told to us in an amicus brief filed by the united states chamber of commerce in 2010 and amicus brief which inspired me to write a book you have in front of you today. the case went before the supreme court called at&t the conception. i suspect many of you know about this case. the question was our class-action waivers embedded in arbitration. the supreme court said yes. justice scalia wrote the opinion of the court says so long as you do it in an arbitration clause. it was appearing to everybody in 2010 that if you got rid of the class-action and enforced it these class action waivers people that have been injured small amounts by corporations, small fraud, small breach of contract, small injuries, people would have a very hard time holding

it was a libertarian socialist of critical violations of civil liberties. i talked to a lot of people because i interviewed the members now but for the research i'm doing pretty when they started applying terms to socialist to themselves. i was about 2015, but a lot of people try 16 and 2017, because bernie sanders just made it. that was a really useful words to rally under. i used to be a little skeptical. probably postcollege enjoyed myself as an anarchist grunt now i embrace the term. and i am persuaded by using it. it helps to explain something useful. >> brings us to our second question. i asked nathan before he started what would you like me to do with q&a. any boundaries or request pretty nice and whatever you do, do not have you question me was socialism. soil have it make my second question. start by defining it. what is socialism. >> one of the reasons i think it is a frustrating question is that the history of socialism is a history of argument about what socialism means. socialist throughout the ages have all said i am a socialist. all these oth

you're a libertarian. . right. >> i don't know if this is -- a violation of libertarianism i think it is moving towards a different phase of how we deal with adversary. >> well i have concerns about it so, obviously, this was a bad us dude he was a trrg and deserved to be killed, obviously, that's true. i have concerns about what states what happened when we took out gadhafi there was additional problems but difference i think is that that's what had i always think when something like this m what happens whereas people on left obama/hillary did exact same sort of thing and didn't have an issue then but they have an issue now because it is trump and i think if trump wouldn't have done this it could have been like look at trump around with his terrorists. so noter what he did they were going to have a problem. so he deserves to die -- about i'm concerned about potential implication because i'm a very antiwar person but consistently so. i felt people are against it because trump did. >> i feel like obama did th

>> he brings a libertarian perspective. he's a democrat but he says maybe we don't need to be so politically correct. if you libersten to a yang appearance, he's not. there are a lot of f bombs thrown around. not your typical democratic candidate. he attracts people who are comfortable with that more libertarian. >> just today they pushed the #yang will win. they pushed oprah meet yang. >> another icon. >> this machine of keeping him visible and out there. >> he doesn't have the money that we're seeing from bernie sanders, from tom steyer, michael bloomberg and probably from biden and everybody else. he goes with the internet. he doesn't even have the money for that but his volunteers can sit and they can push that out. and it is interesting to note. if he does well in iowa, iowa is the land of upsets. not necessarily the land of the nomination but it is where do you better than expectations, you're a winner. if do you less than expected, you're not. he has young people. they can stay up all night pushing the cause and that

i guarantee if we win iowa, we win new hampshire because they're third party libertarians and libertarianse this stuff. we win iowa, we win new hampshire. people realize wow, we can do this for ourselves? i become president a year from now. now, the democrats and progressives are so thrilled to have beaten donald trump, they're like let's pass his flag ship proposal, put money into family's hands. it'll make people stronger, healthier, mentally healthier. but here's the kicker. what are republicans going to say to the dividend? the state that passed the dividend, alaska, is a deep red conservative state and was passed by a republican governor. many conservatives do not mind economic freedom in peoples' hands. what do conservatives detest? a giant bureaucracy making everyone's decisions for them or us taking money away from people. so, you can imagine many people who represent rural areas in red state that is have gotten blasted by automation looking up like do i not like the dividend? this is a goodwin and it's traditionally bipartisan. i don't need 80% of republicans. i just need 20%. the

exploiting things like libertarian philosophy and religious sort of philosophy to change the way people think about punishment undermines the punishment bureaucracy. other efforts seen mostly like ploys to reinforce the punishment bureaucracy. they can take a train i to figure out what -- so i think at the end of the day went to be very, very careful with the kind of coalitions are talking about. make no mistake, most of the conservative criminal justice reformers may have been persuaded some along the way that, especially if they are libertarian, that the criminal legal system is out of control and completely ineffective for its stated aims and something to be really reckoned with. but at the end of the day most democrats and republicans, so supplies to mainstream democrats of our standard libertarians and republicans, most of those people are very happy with how our society works. if, for example, there's a choice between radically dismantling and abolishing the criminal justice system and by keeping our society, most to what looks people choose the latter every single time. if your t

[laughter] brian more libertarian but he is very sterling conservative credentials.nd stall work of the federal society. this is a very long way of asking him how does a member of the right wing conspiracy write a book in support of class actions? [laughter] thank you for that kind introduction. the reason i think conservatives support class actions is because we have to ask ourselves what the alternative is. the alternative was told to us in an amicus brief filed by the united states chamber of commerce in 2010. this amicus brief really is what inspired me to write the book that you have in front of you today. the case with the supreme court is called at&t the conception. i suspect many of you know about this case the question was,. the u.s. supreme court said yes. my old boss justice scalia wrote the opinion and the court says you can ask someone to waive their right doing it class-action. if you enforce these class-action waivers then people had been injured small amounts by corporations small frogs, small breach of contract, small price-fixing injuries, people wi

so that there is no such thing as free floating libertarian out in the ether.everybody lives somewhere and everyone has to be governed and there has to be rules even for the market for trade to work. >> is that an acceptable answer? [laughter] >> exactly just a neutral observer. so that is the end of the discussion. lets think rich lowery very much. [applause] he will be outside signing book books. thank you for being here. [inaudible conversations]

but you know they are libertarians.ppy rand paul fired back that was against the constitution of our family fathers and making light of it. mike lee reiterated the white house refused to answer questions about the eminent attack they say is about to take place. so do iran and mike have a point? they usually do. joining me tonight constitutional studies and cato supreme court review elite's shapiro's back. to be back. so you can go ahead and split the difference. i think eminent do that i am with what i what you describe is the kentucky bourbon night tom massey. i think the problem fundamentally is with these open ended authorizations that are going into two decades now and that's the be-all and end-all of it. this strike was not an expansion of the military theater theater or launching missiles or anything like that. this was attacking an enemy commander who has american blood on his hand in the theater of war where there is authorized use of force. so out the grand strategist figure all of that out implode back and all

[laughter] brian was actually more of a libertarian. but verily sterling conservative credentials he clerked for justice glia works for senator jon cornyn of texas and is a stalwart of the federal society. so this is a very long way of asking him how does a member of the vast right-wing conspiracy write a book in support of class actions. [laughter] >> thank you for that kind introduction. [laughter] the reason i think conservatives should support class actions is because we have to ask ourselves what the alternative is. and the alternative is told to us in an amicus brief, filed by the united states chamber of commerce in 2010. in this amicus brief is really what inspired me to it write the book you have in front of you today. the case with the supreme court is called at&t d conceptually on. i suspect many of you know about this case. the quest was our class action waivers that are embedded in arbitration agreements enforceable? in the u.s. supreme court said yes. my old boss justice glia wrote the opinion in the court said you can ask

a lot of libertarians very skeptical about the usmca.ery restriction us and if there are a few inconsistencies here. we want free trade, we want economic proliferation, but the requirements that all the auto parts estimate in the united states with north american steel is stringent. >> i was definitely against free-trade and the globalized sense. it's great for the u.s., it's a net win for the u.s. it's definitely political win for the president. in terms of is that actually going to create 80000 new manufacturing jobs in the auto industry? they said 500,000 plus jobs overall. nobody knows that nobody has a clue. all the jobs are coming back. i think we did a lot here to protect and move forward with getting the possibility for better manufacturing jobs. but whether that is actually good long terms and term of globalization and having an economy that says we want to work with competitions and things like that. it kinda goes against things like that. kennedy: what about smaller companies that cannot afford north american steel. what if it

or libertarians, when he does the muslim ban or puts up the wall, an anathema to the libertarians positionsition on marriage and his lifestyle. that's the point. you believe -- you start saying and believing the opposite of what you think. or the opposite of what your authentic self feels. steven hassan said, i will follow moon, even if he's hitler, i will follow him to the end, he said, he felt like a sick, almost tingling in his spine of kind of nausea. just a time that you've said something in lockstep with something that you don't believe. it's inauthentic. and, you know, as people around the country fight with trump with relatives or try to show compassion with them, they seem divided to the person themselves. and just even watching people make -- think of reasons for the soleimani assassination, think of reasons retroactively, it's like scrambling around to make excuses for someone who's controlling you or someone who's domineering. >> it's quite a conversation to think about it. and it's a great piece. in the "l.a. times" today. virginia, thank you so much for coming on. your podcas

but the libertarian, american independent, and democratic parties allow non partisan voters to participate if they request a ballot. >>> time is 4:38. tickets go on sale this morning for the 2020-bottle rock festival starting at 10:00. the annual lineup was just announced and the headliners include red hot chili peppers, the dave matthews band and stevie knicks. the festival prides itself on great music, wine, and beer. >> they do a great job of that. yeah and last time the red hot chili peppers came around they put on a great show. >> sorry >> you are our gadget guy. what are your gadgets telling us about traffic today? >> well the gadgets are saying we're off to a decent start. and i was just listening to see if the chp clean up a couple of minor wrecks. nothing major and the computer's telling us a 16- minute drive and there have been no major problems here at the bay bridge toll plaza. looking at interstate 880 it looks all right here and no problems on 580 at the dublin interchange. >> sal i'm going to tell my red hot chili peppers show. long time ago i said okay. the catalyst. >> wow

for >> cully: well, my libertarian friends, that, to libertarians, like you, and others, are botherede is still, we don't have the evidence of an imminent threat, we may get it on wednesday. >> cully: we don't need one, as a legal matter we don't need when. >> that's why disagree. >> harris: big reaction over the weekend from the 2020 democrats under the situation in iran. how the candidates are differentiating themselves with a new focus on foreign policy. what does help for heart failure look like? ♪the beat goes on it looks like emily cooking dinner for ten. ♪the beat goes on it looks like jonathan on a date with his wife. ♪la-di-la-di-di entresto is a heart failure medicine that helps your heart, so you can keep on doing what you love. entresto helped people stay alive and out of the hospital. heart failure can change the structure of your heart, so it may not work as well. entresto helps improve your heart's ability to pump blood to the body. don't take entresto if pregnant; it can cause harm or death to an unborn baby. don't take entresto with an ace inhibitor or aliskiren, or i

he's also facing pressure from certain republicans, including libertarian leaning republicans like randaul, who was on fox news earlier today, to criticize the president's use of foreign policy. make,l point i would secretary of state earlier today at the state department, was incredibly clear that the u.s. would continue to strike an act should tehran continue with expansionary foreign policy. that has developed as a nonstarter for president trump and his administration. vonnie: he also mocked in the assertion that general soleimani was on a diplomatic mission. has anyone identified the potential 13 nightmare scenarios? should tehran continue withthat is a direct quote frome iranians. some: there has been conflicting messages at since been reported, in terms of the president himself and personal comments he made aboard air ,orce one in the last 48 hours as well as public comments that he posted on twitter, saying some cultural sites in iran would potentially be on the list of potential military strikes. defense secretary mark esper said that that is not the case and that the u.s. would

ij's donation's largest libertarian law firm. it means that vs -- we are philosophically libertarian. for present clients from all different backgrounds. we see republicans just about as much as democrats. it turns out violating the constitution is a bipartisan endeavor. roeare in phil constitutional restraints on government. ij is the largest form of its type in the nation. will up to over 130 employees spread out among seven offices. one reason why ij has become so large is that ij has been tremendously successful. in january, we will be arguing our eighth united states supreme court case. in the previous seven, we have won six. overall, we win 70% of our cases although we typically seek out cases people say can't be won. one reason we are to be so successful is because we are not trying to cover alfieri of constitutional law. we focus on four key areas. property rights, educational choice, free-speech and economic liberty. alone who to talk about america -- economic liberty. when i say economic liberty are to the natural light

thank you for being here. >> i more libertarian. i have a lot of friends.onsider running for another party? [indiscernible] >> you have my vote. >> i appreciate it. what is your name? >> dave. >> you. -- thank you. thank you for all of your support. working hard. thank you. i appreciate your support. thank you. how are you? nice to see you. good seeing you again. thank you. i am grateful. have a great night. where did you come from? i appreciate you making the track. he is a good friend. what a small world. give him a hug for me. thank you. have a good night. nice to meet you. thank you so much. how i you? thank you for your service. -- how are you? thank you for your service. thank you for being here tonight. have a good night. how are you? so i could not get to your question. what is your name? >> my name is mark. -- nice to meet you. you are a remarkable inspiration for me. think you are going to win. you have this. >> is a tough road. >> sometimes you have to get through hell to get to heaven. >> thank you. >> i appreciate it. >> i am good. [indiscernib

we have neoconservatives, those who celebrate american greatness, we have libertarians, classical liberals, we have local lists, we have evangelicals, and in the current political climate, they are not as united as they were under the reagan presidency. and a of that has to do with the cold war. so here to talk to us today about the cold war, reagan conservatives, and the end of the cold war, is dr. marcus richard. itcher.c he is at the university of arkansas. he specializes in political, economic, and intellectual history from 1922 the present. modern american conservatism, and his book on reagan comes out soon. he received his phd from the university of alabama. this is what all of the album fans in the room do. tedious classes on the cold war, the conservative movement, the american presidency, the history of economic thought and u.s. economic development. he is published in a lot of places, including the white house journal, it is co-author of a three-volume anthology entitled "public choice analysis of american economic history." he is currently researching for his next book, "filling

if we win iowa, we win new hampshire because new hampshire is third party libertarians and they love this stuff. we win iowa, new hampshire. people realize we can do this for ourselves. this is better than anyone else is talking about. i become president a year from now. the democrats and progressives are so thrilled to have beaten donald trump, they're like let's pass this flag shship proposal. it will make people stronger, healthy year but here's the kicker. what are republicans going to say to the dividend. the state that passed the dividend, alaska is a deep red conservative state and it was passed by a republican governor. many conservatives do not mind economic freedom in people's hands. what do conservatives detest? a giant bureaucracy making every one's decision for them or us taking money away from people. you can imagine many people who represent rule areas and red states that have gotten blasted, are like wait a minute, do i not like the dividend. this is really good win and it's traditionally bipartisan. i don't need 80% of republicans and conservatives. i just need 20%.

the republican national committee, some of you are going to go up and see them on friday, or the libertarian party or the socialist party or green party in the united states which are all much smaller, but what do they do and how do they operate? so i want you to sort of be thinking about that as well. but then we also sort of, again, i gave you a couple more readings in terms of thinking about the republican party in particular. and we had the piece on the shifting inside the republican party, right? and he sketch out the original, as he would say it, the reagan coalition of supply siders, social conservatives and internationalists and that bringing these groupings of ideologies and adherence into one party, that they all influenced each other inside the party, but that the party is shifting, particularly under the leadership of president trump and that trump coalition, to one that is a little bit different than that reagan coalition. that's also where you see some of the tension and fissures that i think some of what mr. waner will be talking about today in terms of his own place in the re

but after 1991, what is holding a libertarian and a political -- a social conservative together? there's not much. i think conservatives consciously used the reagan legacy and they did it really well to try and bring all of these disparate conservatives or people on the right broadly together into -- to keep them in the party, if you will. i think it was largely successful until around 2016. so. do you have a question in the back still? >> i'll catch you up. dr. witcher: sounds great. thank you guys so much. [applause] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2020] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org]

energy but that's not the majority of democrats who got like the last presidential candidate for the libertarian party and involved believes that the problem for the democrats is that there are they are on every side of the issue. most people who are democrats for the last several decades are not socialists they're not willing to become socialists or not persuadable to become socialists so so cortez's position is is not something that most democrats can really identify with so in a large sense she's right the the party that she's in charge should not be the same party that biden is and they do have different positions to what both the democratic and republican party have been doing is they've been going out of their way to try to make it harder for new parties to even get on the ballot there have been multiple court case on the democratic and republican parties have lost multiple court cases all of this and they keep doing this because they are getting worried they're getting a little bit desperate they're realizing that yes their position absolutely is being threatened great well and so they're

have a good night. >> i am more of a libertarian.from montana and i have a lot of friends that support your campaign. would you consider running third-party? rep. gabbard: i'm not really [indiscernible] ♪ >> you have got my vote. rep. gabbard: thank you, i appreciate that. thank you for coming. thank you for all of your support. out working hard, thank you. hi, how are you doing? >> [inaudible] rep. gabbard: thank you i appreciate your support. how are you? nice to see you. >> [indiscernible] rep. gabbard: thank you, i appreciate it. good to see you again. appreciate your support. have a good night. how are you? where did you come from? >> massachusetts. rep. gabbard: i appreciate you making the trek. thank you. have a good night. how are you? nice to meet you. >> 1, 2, 3. rep. gabbard: thank you so much. how are you. thank you for your service. >> can we take a photo? rep. gabbard: thank you for being here tonight. >> 1, 2, 3. rep. gabbard: thank you, have a good night. how are you? >> nice to meet you. my name is mark. i have a lot

at that time you know removing troops is what we want as a libertarian but. nobody should be paying switching parties or at least at this time of year because it's all politicized you have to separate the 2 groups of people who think the united states has an eye has an empire to fan and that they are morally justified to do it versus those of us who believe that we should be noninterventionist and follow the constitution and follow international law and the extra 3 fellows into u.s. troops are actually being deployed to the region growing tension was not on the table from the start do you think what what this washington's strategy for the reason for the region as it's. well i think it's been very clear this is one thing that deserves credit for he's been consistent in his campaign and everything is going on he always wants to escalate you know the antagonism toward iran other places it's up and down and back and forth and i sort of i'm always hopeful that he really doesn't want to another war and i think pompei when he gets up there and says all these really

club for a bit more analysis on this we can now cross to sariah fast she's a libertarian 2020 u.s. presidential candidate thanks so much for joining us on this look we were hearing earlier that netanyahu sung the praises of trump still perhaps not surprising to some given their relationship but the palestinians don't seem as keen why not. all of course not because it's a one sided deal that's all they think it is and it's kind of interesting how the time frame of this for a veil happens right at the same time where and that's when ya whole. turned down his unity and he's being indicted on charges of bribery and corruption so i feel like this is trump's way like he does in the united states of having a deterrence you know something to throw people off on the real issue he's doing the same thing with israel to help him where you've got obviously both presidents going through some of the most trumps impeachment trial ongoing as you said you know who has his own sort of political turmoil that he's grappling with but let's talk about how the peace plan is put in place you know the detai