but that's logical. and of course, these people don't deal with the same kind of logic that you and i deal with. they love their guns more than they love human life. i mean, that's the bottom line. they love their guns more than they love human life. >> i mean, lonnie, that is the sad reality, it would seem, in many cases here. the argument is so visceral now on both sides, that both sides are so implaqcable. i try to respect the other view. but i find it very difficult when you hear people like the state senator being so glib about 100-round magazines which to me have no place in civilian hands. >> of course not. >> lonnie, how do we try to move forward? how do we try and get some movement to make america -- forget the word control -- to just make it safer, to have more gun safety? >> piers, there's already 300,000 guns out there. >> 300 million. >> i'm sorry, 300 million. so the horse is out of the barn. the only thing we can do at this point is the thing that brady is trying to do is get background ch

they use the laws of logic. i keep emphasizing that. i want bill to tell me and a view of the universe as a result of natural processes, explain then where the laws of logic came from. why should we trust the laws of nature? i mean are they going to be the same tomorrow as they were yesterday? in fact, some of the greatest scientists that ever lived isaac newton, james clerk maxwell, michael faraday, were creationists. and as one of them said, you know, thinking gods thought after him and that's really modern science really came out of. that thinking, that we can do experiments today and we can do the same tomorrow. we can trust the laws of logic. we can trust the laws of nature. and if we don't teach our children correctly about this, they're not going to be innovative. and they're not going to be able to come up with inventions to advance in our culture. and so i think that the person was trying to get out that see you know there are lots of secularists out there doing work and they don't believe in creation and they came up with grea

this is the same logic that if i catch a guy breaking into my house as a gracious host. i should offer him a pizza because it is home to. this is just a slap in the face the rule of law but also to the immigrants who do go for the bureaucracy and headaches to become us citizens the right way the legal way supplies you if you're going to provide these illegal immigrants was some sort of document it should be appointed to pack all with instructions on how to apply for green card legit proper away just like everyone else passed. just lacking. i am the books soon. having it's a bit. in many of these seats

. >> the only logical explanation for the verdict is that the jury hung on whether he acted in self-defense and firing the fatal shots into jordan davis, but remember, there was a second volley of shots direct ed ed to car, and those are the attempted murder counts that the jury convicted on and of course for firing into the car. so ironically, you have a hung jury on the main issue, and whether jordan davis' death was caused by his action and firing on the fleeing vehicle, and they convicted on that. >> well, it is very interesting that someone e-mailed me, and they said, how can he be found guilty of attempted murder and then not be found guilty of killing someone? >> because of paul's explanation, and the first things first. this is the process at work, don.

has to stay independent in the sense they regulate their immigration themselves that seems to be a logical so would you accept a return to visas quotas border. we want to return to controlling immigration again visa has to do something with people traveling across the borders free movement of persons is similar but free movement of persons says you have to rights to install yourself permanently in a country and no other independent country would do this the americans the russians the chinese to canadians nobody would agree we just open the borders for anybody who wants to come and live here to control on the borders is a different story also important. that's controlling the borders but my main point is immigration an independent country has to control itself but when you talk about cracking down on immigration or limiting immigration you automatically fail like you're talking about eyes english isolationist policies and then you can't help the figure that switzerland which is you know hard country it diplomatic center of the world how can it live isolationist policies in the world of glob

union do to me that seems to be normal if the ukraine for instance would say to themselves it is logical that we are a member of the european union and then you can start to discuss free movement of persons but if you want to stay outside in long terms you will never agree on free movement of persons because that is that is the substance substance of every individual country to have to control over immigration like united states canada japan china of course canada every country russia has to stay independent in the sense they regulate their immigration themselves that seems to be logical so would you accept a return to visas quotas border. we want to return to controlling immigration again visa has to do something with people traveling across the borders free movement of persons is similar but free movement of persons says you have to right to install yourself permanently in a country and no other independent country would do this the americans the russians the chinese to canadians nobody would agree we just open the borders for anybody who wants to come and live here the control of the

spot when they're looking at politicians on the news or in press conferences that among the many logical fallacies that bush was responsible for was red herring right otherwise known as changing the goalpost we talking about the real reason why we invaded iraq and then he goes full circle and brings about put what about what about not a label to force if we didn't do that and what could have been exactly my argument or something bad is going to happen and i have to say about this up it goes both ways journalist it's also the responsibility of journalists and people to decipher of these lies from politicians and report on them accurately it's not it's a two way street the lie doesn't work unless someone believes the lie right i mean you're watching you're watching politicians and if journalists aren't catching these logical fallacies aren't catching these signs then they're feeding into it because at the end of the day a lie is only good if the person that's being lied to accept that lie right so in a lot of ways it's almost a mutual understand and when it's as obvious as bush i mean real

they use the laws of logic. i keep emphasizing that. i want bill to tell me and a view of the universe as a result of natural processes, explain then where the laws of logic came from. why should we trust the laws of nature? i mean are they going to be the same tomorrow as they were yesterday? in fact, some of the greatest scientists that ever lived, isaac newton, james clerk maxwell, michael faraday, were creationists. and as one of them said, you know, thinking god's thought after him and that's really modern science really came out of. that thinking, that we can do experiments today and we can do the same tomorrow. we can trust the laws of logic. we can trust the laws of nature. and if we don't teach our children correctly about this, they're not going to be innovative. and they're not going to be able to come up with inventions to advance in our culture. and so, i think that the person was trying to get out that see , you know there are lots of , secularists out there doing work and they don't believe in creation and they came up wi

and not accepting the logic that position would lead them to. it's the logic that federal judges in six states now have accepted that there is no constitutional justification for states to discrimination against same sex couples who want to marry. these republicans have been caught in a bit of a tolerant theater trap of their own making. joining me now, the executive director of log cabin republicans. greg, do you think there's a mismatch between coming out against this legislation, and still adhering to the view that you don't support marriage equality? >> not at all, chris. i'm fond of saying that liberals are never happy even when they win. and tonight is a perfect example of that the fact that you have all of these republicans that have come out in support of a discriminatory bill. the fact that you had a republican governor come out and veto that bill is not enough. i have enough difficulty on the hill right now trying to make sure when we're advocating for things like the unemployment discrimination act, to let republicans know you should

they use the laws of logic. i keep emphasizing that. i want bill to tell me and a view of the universe as a result of natural processes, explain then where the laws of logic came from. why should we trust the laws of nature? i mean are they going to be the same tomorrow as they were yesterday? in fact, some of the greatest scientists that ever lived, isaac newton, james clerk maxwell, michael faraday, were creationists. and as one of them said, you know, thinking gods thought after him and that's really modern science really came out of. that thinking, that we can do experiments today and we can do the same tomorrow. we can trust the laws of logic. we can trust the laws of nature. and if we don't teach our children correctly about this, they're not going to be innovative. and they're not going to be able to come up with inventions to advance in our culture. and so i think that the person was trying to get out that see you know there are lots of secularists out there doing work and they don't believe in creation and they came up with gre

so they let common perceptions outweigh logic and science.ase. >> paul spent ten months in jail, facing a possible death sentence for a crime that never happened. >> there are days i can't bear to look at pictures of my mother and father. because i -- i just remember the fire. >> he spent ten months in jail. that was liberty that was taken away from him that he'll never get back. it was a time he should have been grieving for the loss of his parents, and instead he was fighting for his own life. >> when asked how it felt to be right all along, not surprisingly, steve avato had no comment. but his colleagues spoke for him. >> his courage was later recognized by his fellow fire investigators when the international association of arson investigators named him investigator of the year for standing up to the enormous peer pressure that came down on him when he said wait a minute, guys, i don't think we've really got an arson here. >>> the mother of two young children went missing from her suburban home. a few days later her close friend and co-wor

when it's a murder so off the wall and no real logic behind why it had to happen why, you know? >> the most logical suspect was 31-year-old michael bryant, haynes' co-worker at the medical company. he brought her home as an investment. >> she agreed to sell him this house where she had spent 20 years, you know, her whole adult life. the deal was he would pay the mortgage on it which was not much left. and he would pay her $25,000 cash and help her out a little bit with her new place. >> when questioned by police, bryant said he gave ms. haynes a $25,000 check and she signed over the deed to the house. but investigators found no evidence that haynes cashed the check and no trace of it was found in the rubble. shockingly, bryant was unwilling to issue another $25,000 check to ms. haynes' estate. >> we did have to sue him to get the $25,000. he wasn't going to pay that until we came up and did that. >> bryant denied having anything to do with the arson and murder. and he had a solid alibi. >> at the time of the fire, michael bryant did have an alibi. he was 20 miles away at a grill

and if the -- if the kind of logic nazis have their way that divide will only grow and they will constantly be harping on those who want to bridge it by saying you're popularizing, you're simplifying. >> you are the big easy popularizer around -- >> i am. i plead guilty. >> the book people kept around their house to look like they read it. and yet you had people on side with that. you did it with blink, you did it with outliers. why is that different here? >> i always get the criticism. >> that's not -- no? >> there's always been some push back, from people when would prefer my books to be -- to have less life to them. and to take fewer chances. >> let's talk about this. in the book you often, in some cases you refer to people's upbringings and experiences and how they framed them, including with dyslexia. what about your upbringing shaped who you are and how you think? >> yeah, i don't know. you know, you and i are both canadian. so we know there was something pecular and interesting and wonderful about canada. my mother's jamaican and my father's english. if your parents are that rebellio

the logic of citizens united in other decisions that are framed around that certainly our judicial branch has failed to value the idea of one man, one vote. you don't count more because you run a corporation and you can heave money in favor of your political fiphilosophy on to th project. >> free speech. >> you know what, everyone reacted the wrong way when they heard that decision. the chant from the left became corporations are people? corporations are not people. well, no, actually under the law, that's the reason for corporations. you know, they are, indeed, given the rights of individuals and that's why you form corporations and that's how the law streets them. they're sociopaths as people. that's who they are. but if all you care about is your profit to the shareholders and nothing else in human terms you're probably a sociopath but okay they get to exist as -- no. it was speech is money. when you start equating speech with money and you see them as being comparable -- money is fundamentally the opposite of speech in many ways. speech, i mean, or it's a speech so foul it shouldn't b

if you subscribe to perkins logic and believe the i rich should get more votes for federal elections, everybody else should get more votes at the state and local level. we've been asking tom perkins says there is a war on the rich. tell us why he's right or wrong. tds said it's not a war on the rich. it's a war on their unfair practices that are bleeding people and our country dry. and jeremiah writes if there is, their enemy is under funded outgunned and lacks funding. >>> mr. johnston, what is your reaction to mr. perkins' statements? >> i'm grad he' glad he's sayine things. we need to understand that we're a democracy, we are not a corporation. the ideas he has been proposing have been examined by philosophers and economists for more than 2,000 years, and every classic worldly philosopher and by the way george w. bush believes in progressive taxation. the idea of it is that we're all equal as people. the greater the gain you manage to attain, in a society as mr. perkins has done very well, the greater the burden you should bear to put back into society that made it possible for you

know what you look at let's use logic. what is there to do if money is not involved why fight for an idea ok so there may be about a thousand people here friday a logical reasons. but what's a thousand. nothing to be spoiled people were used like a condom and tossed away. that's an independent ukraine for you. come here journalist. how was it today. with the many people. i poured more than two thousand cups of tea for the more than two thousand cups of tea. i would hear a doctor but you are neutral or do you support one side over the other i'll tell you something is burning gas hits a barrack a member and he's in flames and i happen to be nearby i won't stop for a second to think about who it is it's a human being burning that's all that matters of course i'm trying to help him. with the tolerance and loyalty of always being characteristics of ukraine but now i don't know where this road will lead to go. the problem it was a problem very hard to take the plunge again there was a plug hat that had sex with the target where

this is the logic of the addict. sure.ct is going to be the project that does us in. just like no single drink is what does the drunk in. sure. it doesn't matter if we quit today or tomorrow, but if we say we're going to quit today and then push it off until tomorrow, we are not quitting, so let us not fool ourselves. if we spend billions of dollars to tap an entire new keg, a dirty keg at that, we are not quitting. we are sinking further into our dependence and self-destruction and dissolution. now, this fight is far from over. john kerry ultimately still has to sign off on the recommendation to allow the pipeline to be built, and the president will have the ultimate say and he has set the standard very recently in his own state of the union. >> the shift to a cleaner energy economy won't happen overnight. and it will require some tough choices along the way. but the debate is settled. climate change is a fact, and when our children's children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more s

. >> there was certainly no logical explanation as to why miss medlin left her vehicle. the first thing we attempted to do was to determine if, in fact, a crime had occurred. >> the next day, a search team found kim's body a mile and a half from her car, hidden under some debris. >> we watched the news, and my wife looked at me and she says, i've seen enough. it's her. so we turned off the tv and unplugged both the phones and just went to bed. >> this was not a robbery. her wedding band, wedding ring, there was a necklace still in place around her neck, those items that would have potential value were still present on her. >> the autopsy revealed kim had been beaten, kicked and strangled, but there were no signs of sexual assault. >> there were several blows on the back of her head and neck and her back area that would have been consistent with blunt-force trauma. our theory is that she was knocked down from behind, she was stomped on her back and she was -- had something pressed up against the front of her neck. >> and there was evidence that kim's wrists had been bound

i said we had the rules of logic, the uniformity of nature. that makes sense within a biblical worldview anyway. we can go to experimental silent -- science because we assume those laws are true and they will be tomorrow. i do want to say this. you said a few times his -- ken ham's view or model. i had video quotes from some scientists. it is dr. -- there are a lot of creation scientists who agree with what we're saying concerning the bible and the account of creation. it is not just my model in that sense. there is so much i could say. as i listened to you i believe you are confusing terms and regard to species and times. we are not saying god created species, he created kind. we are not saying species got on the ark, we are saying kind. there is a number of papers on our website with dogs and this one breach with this one and you can look at the papers around the world and connect them and said -- say that represents one kind. they have predicted probably less than 1000 kinds were on noah's ark. under 2000 animals. there was plenty of room o

it seems like a logical motive for what subsequently occurred. and that's a powerful narrative that makes sense that is going to have to be countered. >> thank you, gene robinson. what a day to spend friday. friday seems to be the night they put out all this stuff and they're trying to cover it up. thank you, eugene robinson. thank you, jonathan capehart. >>> coming up, more on the man at the center of this scandal, david wildstein. he is the guy christie has been criticizing, or somebody in his office. he is also christie's worst nightmare. that's why he is going after him. >>> it's been done again. rand paul tries to smear hillary clinton by going after bill clinton. he called him a predator again. this guy just trying to curry favor with those on the right or does he think this stuff will actually work in a primary situation? we'll see. >>> and look. who sees no obvious reason why he shouldn't run for president, joe biden. well one obvious reason is hillary clinton. is he ready to run against hillary clinton? that's my issue. i know it seems s

so i will say the logical foundation doesn't exist.money,. so i will say the logical foundation doesn't exist.bill g george soros money. so i will say the logical foundation doesn't exist. >> no secret there is tension between you and the speaker. he reportedly referred to you by a word we cannot use on the air. how is that relationship now, will it be patched up, can you work together on other issues? >> the speaker has had a number of opportunities to clear that up and he's declined it every opportunity. so is that essentially a public confession that what he said on the house floor to a couple of liberal democrats was true, it was not denied. it isn't up to me to demand an apology. instead, i will go forward maintaining the decorum necessary to be effective in this job. it's interesting, though, that i and others have been lectured about having verb allege discipline when we see that that doesn't exist within our own speaker.allege discipline when we see that that doesn't exist within our own speaker. >> clearly he's upset with comments yo

felons love this logic. studies show they're less likely to rob you if they think you're armed. any idiot knows this, almost any. >> what are you laughing at? >> the last part. >> i get it. i got it. >> bob, i'm coming at you because alarming fact for you. china, 2.2 million troops. we're going to go down to, what, 440,000? >> yeah. >> that's got to alarm you. >> not particularly. >> you sit here and yell and scream. >> i think that the chinese, first, the chinese are going to attack russia, first. >> they are. if i were the russians, i would be careful about that. i said this over and over again. the chinese are the biggest threat to this country but it's not because they have 2 million troops. they don't have 2 million bathrooms in the country. >> certainly no bathroom dividers. >> what they are getting, they're getting drones which they steal from us, the blueprints for it. flat top carriers from the russians. they're growing a naval presence that has the pacific in its sights. that worries me, but we don't need to have as big an army as we had. >> that's what the chinese tel

by the way towards other countries do these dana to show feel for democracy you do so with the old logic countries this once more undermines the whole cream of transparency and democracy building and but to do building of political institutions these are all ideological efforts to into ones politics in other countries and also by the way shows how casual these people can talk about the do politics of another country so loss to come for you here on the program on r.t. international including on the corruption truly eating away at the e.u. our new reporter appeals the huge levels of money being lost leaving some to wonder why the wrongdoings in europe's own financial institutions are not being made public more on that story in just a moment. is the media leave us so we leave that maybe. by the same motions to the. way the party years ago. says that no one is asking with the guests that you deserve answers from it's all on politicking only of our team. speak your language. programs and documentaries in arabic it's all here on. reporting from the world talks syfy ip interviews intriguing sto

wants some troops to remain in the country by the pentagon's logic the pursuit of terrorists is best based in the region same goes for u.s. drones and without american help the afghan army could collapse but the u.s. first needs the afghan president to sign off on a key security pact something he has been refusing to do so far. now our position continues to be that if we cannot conclude a bilateral security agreement promptly then we will be forced to initiate planning for a post twenty fourteen future in which there would be no u.s. or nato troop presence in afghanistan there's also the issue of talking with the enemy the consensus seems to be that the afghan war could only end in a negotiated settlement with the taliban not a military victory but that's proven elusive the taliban are internally divided and the rift between kabul and washington has reportedly empowered hardline commanders who want to keep on fighting at the expense of those who support peace talks the u.s. war has succeeded in toppling the taliban regime and many afghans have seen their lives and prove but those gai

between england on the one hand in scotland the other england is increasingly being absorbed by the logic of perch real estate eighty for the masses and socialism for the bankers and with a selected few. you have. a kind of. new a new form of for you the skepticism there's going to be if that end which is very likely is going to push or england or the whole of britain the city remains unified out of the european union whereas north of the border north of haiti as well you have the majority of the scots who are very seriously questioning the logic of perpetual stay the course completely now they're really committed to staying within the in the european union and who was not taken over by the frenzy of as you know phobia which is so evidence out of the border especially with their eyes of you keep and the general attitude towards the so called of invasion of the british isles by foreigners romanians bulgarians and so on ok now i'm grad that you kind of bring up greece because in greece retail sales are up car sales are up industrial production is up and great deals there are down the questi