. >> i've been trying to work out a language to -- the logic of the war and the logic of peace and right now we're in the logic of war and there was president obama explaining to the american people why we have to go to war in iraq again. although he doesn't like to call it war. but that's essentially what we're being asking to go. and in the logic of war what he's proposing is perfectly reasonable. as long as you're fighting against this kind of military force, then, you know, military force seems to be called for. but if you notice, the one thing that's succeeded is the peace between israel and egypt and we don't talk about making peace. we're talking about making war. and so what -- how could we resolve this? we're essentially talking about several areas of conflict that could be peacefully resolved. one is the israelis and palestinians. that's not an impossible problem. in my lifetime, growing up in the segregated south. i grew up in the cold war and the soviet union was dissolved. anything this possible. >> history changes and people -- you get the sense, sometimes, that the partici

we know who the enemy is, i mean in general we do, idea logically we know who the enemy is, but in order to get the soft targets that are set of you've got to be specific here, i don't think you can just you know blankly idea logically say that these are bad people, you've got to identify them. we need better intel to do that, better intelligence we've got to get inside of these things. >> just this week late this week, we heard high school a new york, upstate new york pine bush high school where they were told to recite the pledge of allegiance in arabic. maybe that's causing some of the problems. >> absolutely that's part of the problem. lone wolf attacks are difficult to prevent, but begin the amount of threats that have been made, western the thousands of westerners that have chosen to join the ranks of isis we need to be more vigilant than ever. but it isn't just these lone wolf attackers, the fight is is a brord and what we need is more commitment, a stronger commitment and stronger resolve from the president obama to rooting out isis from their strong holds in the middle east to n

signatures and speaking with berkeley city staff to see if something can be donel but they say the logical solution is to just eliminate the stop altogether. >> like you can see one bus stop to the next. you probably could throw a ball that far. >> reporter: but sometimes when you're trying to move a bureaucracy, even short distances can seem like forever. in berkeley john ramos, kpix 5. >> the business owners say they are encouraged by berkeley's response to their complaints. the city has recommended a meeting with ac transit and the businesses to work out a solution. >>> san francisco woman's desperate to track down a priceless object stolen from her home. an urn was taken when burglars

that is he logical -- illogical. charlie: with the new reality of isis, what changes do you see an attitude toward you in staying in the syrian government? president assad: regarding the west? i think the west has changed their regulations after the rise of isis. that didn't mean they change their approach to conflict in syria and iraq. i don't they have learned the lesson. the very beginning of the problem, from the western perspective, is to change the system or the president or the government they do not like. they are still moving in the same direction. that is why nothing concrete has changed. their priority is to fight isis but that does not mean their priority is to get writ of isis. charlie: how can you see the u.s. cooperating with syria? president assad: there is no direct cooperation. in the future, there must be direct dialogue to fight terrorism because it is on our ground, in our soil. they cannot defeat it without our cooperation. we know the reality. charlie: most people believe there is unofficial co

how could, according to this logic how could that be the best thing happened to me? in what logic. to lose? to destroy the country? to kill your supporters, and to kill others and to kill civilians, in what sense could that be the best thing that happened to me and to the government? that's illogical. that's unpolitical. >> how now would the new reality of isis what new changes do you see in attitude towards you and staying and the syrian government? >> regarding the west. >> yes. >> i think the west has changed its calculations after the rise of isis. but that doesn't mean they changed their approach to the conflict in syria and in iraq and in our region. i don't think they have learned the lison-- lesson well. and as a result that will not change the course of the events. because the very beginning of the problem from the western perspective is to change the system or the president or the government that they don't like and they're still moving in the same direction. that's why nothing concrete has changed it. only the experience and the priorities. their priority is to fight isi

there is no real logic to it. there is a lot of randomness. but we are trying to do design where we put in a cassette vs methane catabolism. you plug in this cassette and have energy production for the cell. we are trying to reorganize. the genome that is more complicated than it might seem. the point is to get to where we can do design from known components to build new things for the future. these are the early baby steps that would allow us -- >> let me run through some of those purposes. >>you are talking about pollution eating bugs. toxin eating bugs, medicine producing bugs, you would then put them in the air and water and land. the first question comes to my mind -- how hungry are we about to be, or how energy needy, or how anxious for freshwatera are we, where politicians would back it? >> let me correct your earlier statement. are claims not to add them back to the environment. i think that would be a mistake to do. as you know, we have sailed around the globe taking samples every 200 miles in the ocean sequencing the organisms there.

>> i think it's the next most logical way for terrorists to enter the country is come over the southern border. airports are the first most obvious. we are doing what we can to the best of our ability to tackle that through tsa and everything else we have in the airways. whether you are watching movies in hollywood or reading books or looking at evidence this is the next most logical way for us to get attacked. we need to pay attention to it. >> last word. thanks, guys. cavuto on business 20 minutes from now. >> turns out jihad john in all those isis beheading videos comes from a very well-to-do family, college degree. time for the administration to think that jobs for jihadists idea. and governor scott walker yet again. whoever wins this fight could decide if workers across america struggle again themselves. see you at the bottom of the hour. >>> thanks neil, we can't wait. >>> first nancy pelosi saying members of congress are just like average americans living paycheck to paycheck? have you seen the size of their checks? maybe it's time for a reality involvement in the rebellion. back

back in these talks. >> you say it's logical, everything was logical until the point at which primeister benjamin netanyahu failed to mention any alternative proposal for trying to limit the iranian nuclear program. >> is he part of the p5+1? >> no, he is not. i understand him trying to negotiate everything. but when he says we can go at it alone, that's not true, they know that. and that is why we give them the $3 billion a year in military aid. so this is the only way that we were able to get them to the table right now because many impose sanctions or enforce sanctions and they cannot avoid these economic pressures. so we have created a right environment that will limit nuclear potential and i think that is really important. those of us that didn't agree with the prime minister, let's let these negotiations play out and see if we can reach an agreement. we may not be able to. kennedy: why are we so hot on the idea of creating nuclear energy for ronald were not even doing that in our country. why are we bending over backwards to make this deal happen? >> i'm not going to render ju

there are a lot of atheists i know who are logical thinkers.eists are ultra rationalists and that wouldn't be the worst thing in the world having someone in the white house who took a logical approach to everything. am i wrong about that? >> no i don't think you are wrong about it. >> that was a really good point. >> it is too good of a point. you want a logical person to be president? of course. >> is that possible? >> no. anybody who needs people's votes that they need to run for president is a sociopath. in the history of the world every world leader was a sociopath for all time. you can't need -- i need you guys to think i am the best and write it down. write it down that i am the best. i am better than you. >> andy you say you love ted cruz. >> i think it is clear that's what i am saying. i think most americans think atheists have no moral values. i don't agree with that, but it is not my opinion. it is america's opinion. >> we have so much more good stuff coming up. >> mum's the word. >> are leonardo dicaprio and justin bieber becoming be

the entitlement we think that while we will prefer to see it onsite the option is perfectly norma logical reason under the housing ordinance we question and can't understand how somehow paying a fee to the mayor's office of housing is a legitimate way of getting funds they do a great job this is underfunded and they put it to good use and they the evidence will then show it 2 to 1 although it didn't result in being built at the same time as affordable housing it was a good project when then and it should be approved in the way it was presented thank you. >> sue hester the last one drove me around a bit we spent years doing planning market octavia plan was adapted i know the personal calendar i carry it around adapted 4 slash 172008 and eastern was adapted before the adoption years of serious work from people in market octavia and people in south of market people in the mission district about how to address the housing needs of the city when they said 40 percent 2 bedrooms in market octavia it didn't come out of the air but years of struggle market octavia plan is in the context of the gen

merchant were interviewed i've been to the meetings on church and the out reaches but polk street logically in size is narrowed becau

merchant were interviewed i've been to the meetings on church and the out reaches but polk street logically in size is narrowed because it's an older street i'm not anti bike or pro car or pro bike and anti car i want to look at an

larkin's that is a logical comment the policy derivative was a lane the 25 foot sidewalk is not one we initiated. >> maybe mr. sanchez can explain. >> thank you connor to rehereby the department's recommendation to add text to section one hundred 61 to codify in any with a reduction by the zoning administrator through 7 h we on the advice of the sfmta we're proposing a change bicycle pathway to bike lanes not just bike pathway like golden gate park and mr. johnson referred the current nexus study do not take into account g f a with off-street parking to change the basis of oozing how those fees are calculated would facility a new nixon nexus study to effected parties this ordinance didn't mention the impact fees will again be another conversation we talked it will be the time of the publication i received public comments and have e-mailed copies in reference to the exemption for projects in the van ness su d and if i may conclude to answer commissioner moore's question about the 25 foot parking this is actually in place under planning code section 1 61 b an exemption for off street loa

. >> it is a grim assessment, but it's a logical and realistic one.e have had confirmation from the french transport minister that that is the case. when you bear in mind that the flight, the aircraft was traveling 38,000 feet at the time of the incident, as we're hearing now the kind of official evidence that has emerged, images indicate that the plane started to fall very sharply and when you bear in mind the kind of region that it landed in, we're talking about a mountainous region. >> tell us a bit more for those of us who don't know the area in outern france about the area and toptopography. it is a very mountainous region, there are ski resorts nearby, very sparsely populated and very remote areas. in terms of this kind of mobilization, all the emergency services, it's not as though this has happened in a big city where there are fire stations and ambulances and police at hand people have had to be mobilized from the surrounding region. even emergency service to say get to the scene will be very difficult. we're looking at this now it's no longe

minimize response times, natural boundaries and adjust for possible consideration and provide more logical alignment >> it led to a particular service incident. it will be considered very strong when looking at the data in terms of district and how they mean that. all of these others are considered along the way. a little bit on this selection process a number of changes which are then built into a great number of map options. those map options were combined, presented by the consultant to the working group of command staff members who then ranked the order and talked through it and came up with a group of final recommendations which they presented to the steering committee who selected the map which is in front of you today. what we see here is the final citywide map proposed and we are here today at this public meeting as well as the one in the future to hear what the public has to say about these ideas before the districting changes. with that we'll be here if there are any questions from the commissioners or the public to answer those. >>> we have some vip's that have arrived. dr. mars

the beating boat and it helps to fill the boat on its own it is easy you can't purchase time it is logic. >> so the timing of when you need to add more boats. >> this is when the service what about sustainableable as a maritime entity we're not going to flood the bay with a course of logistics to save it meaning the partnership we've engaged including the port we educate once i see sustainable ridership i'll add another vessel it's hand in hand we're doing the best to fill the boat to facilitate the needed of the transportation demands if this psyches our goal to add a sister it is important to us. >> maritime to represent the clean and safety environment so hopefully by string our goal. >> to the other commissioners. >> so those are great questions there what percentage would you say commuters would be the percentage of passengers. >> our commuter service we have to dance the dedicate so it's for the corporate aspect that is 6 months of daily usage as a high demand the company we're working with and the service because of our lack of assets we did if the facilities if our vessel now we

you justify so much. >> there's no logical explanation other than faith. >> going clear.son of belief is the chilling documentary from an oscar winning director on the belief system and secretive inner workings the church of scientology based on the book by lawrence wright, producer and one of the people interviewed in the film. the documentary unfolds mainly from the perspective of several former members of the church who each recount their journeys into and out of scientology. one says she was john travolta's main liaison to the church early in his career. she plotted her escape while pregnant what she describes a prison camp within the church after she discovered her infant daughter neglected in a children's ward. >> i told them i was having problems with my pregnancy and i needed to use the phone. i called one of the few nonscientologists i knew who worked for john travolta. i said meet me at this address. i go up to my daughter's room and i wrapped her up. and there is a bodyguard with me. i said my sister-in-law is in that car and she's going to take the baby to the

other logic's of development with superior rationality. you expound on that and also, you talked a lot about the impact of imperialism capitalism on africa's agricultural population. >> yes, i think -- i think it only have a few minutes now. [indiscernible] this virus, enforcement, many people have been contaminated by it. and not just the leaders of the political system, but the people themselves. anyway what is needed today is precisely to construct [indiscernible] we start with nations. the war has never been changed by the top, by changing the global order. it is changing at the bottom, which is starting to change the balance of forces. that creates the condition for eventually changing also the global order from unipolar system of domination to a negotiated multipolar globalization. that is what we mean by sovereign project. we should be national in that sense. but in the sense of getting the truth and the peoples of the various nations. [indiscernible] which would ensure the whole of the nation, 100%, since nothing is perfect, let's

so they let common perceptions outweigh logic and science. and luckily, logic and science prevailed in this case. >> paul spent ten months in jail, facing a possible death sentence for a crime that never happened. >> there are days i can't bear to look at pictures of my mother and father. because i -- i just remember the fire. >> he spent ten months in jail. that was liberty that was taken away from him that he'll never get back. it was a time that he should have been grieving for the loss of his parents, and instead, he was fighting for his own life. >> when asked how it felt to be right all along, not surprisingly, steve avato had no comment. but his colleagues spoke for him. >> his courage was later recognized by his fellow fire investigators when the international association of arson investigators named him investigator of the year for standing up to the enormous peer pressure that came down on him when he said, wait a minute, guys, i don't think we've really got an arson here >>> the mother of two young children went missing from her su

." >> logical.n, spock possessed rigidly logical mind and distinctive ears. those ears upset some viewers at first. sunday morning interview in 2005 nimoy recalled one what network executives had to say about those viewers' concerns. >> they were not accept in their homes a character who looks devilish. get rid of the ears or the character. >> fan mail in favor of mr. spock turned the tide. >> give us more of that guy they love that guy. >> commander spock with you? >> this is spock. >> assuring three-season run. as well as three emmy nominations. >> 50 years longest job i ever had was two weeks. when i arrived on the star trek set had dressing room with my name on it with something other than john, wow. found a home. jim, your name is jim. >> yes. >> nimoy went on to play spock again in series of films. two of which he directed. and he carried the star trek banner at countless conventions of so-called trekkie iss. the size of the first one he said caught him enfirely off guard. >> there were 3,000

i don't know if logical proof is enough to deal with senior management.e has any logical proof that isn't already out there because the older other stuff is out there. -- all the other stuff is out there. hsbc like the other european banks is just digging itself out right now. between public perception of the real things they have done that have damaged the banks and the broader banking systems, hsbc have to take out an ad in the paper talking about the allegations of this whistleblower addressing them and saying we are trying to move past on this. alix: ceo saying -- offering sincerest apologies apologizing, it was a different era. it continues to drag them back to just when we get out, they drag us back in. like that from "godfather" there. the dollar is surging and the yuan fell to two-year lows. bloomberg news -- excuse me, the economist here at bloomberg had a great article on this over the weekend, saying that there is a distinction between cutting rates annex already growth versus providing a floor for decelerating growth. that is an important dist

so, there was a very -- very logical way we did this here. our tiller back there would yell " tip yip yaw." >> tee yip yaw! >> that was our saying we used. all that means our mule stopped. what is going to happen is we are going to turn our boat around. back then, you would not be able to do this because your boats were longer. we are cutting it close. so like i said, these were very family oriented boats. we wouuld hld the father would be on the front of the boat in charge of looking out for any dangers making sure the otetow line was safe. on the back of the boat, you would have the mother. the mother would be in charge of steering along with doing tours mostly sewing. so the men can no longer say women were no good at driving. the children, if they were of a certain age, nine years old, we would actually get the right to work. we'd go ahead and have been walking with our mules. at the age of nine, they would go ahead and start working. i promise it was not child labor. if they were any younger we had to do something with them. they could n

but at least his scheme logically holds together. i am not sure that rogan really cares so much about making it all logically hold together. in that sense, the book is in a way not so much a blueprint or a schematic. it's an expose. and when you're doing an expose since basically what you're doing is attacking something. you don't have to be consistent. you can attack it anyway you want to. you can attack it with what ever tools, rhetorical tools come to mind. does this make sense? >> we had a similar conversation about this book earlier. you know, the difference between the way schlesinger fits it in and he has the last little mary -- very precise bit of evidence that he can work in print. it shows that the jacksonian democrats were -- professor feller: it may be wrong but he does say it. >> he takes the evidence that fits in. rogan, the impression we got, he is going through andrew jackson 's life, and instead of getting things to work, it he goes, how can i fit this in and do a psychoanalytic and marxist theory? that was why we we

logic. now, king versus burwell before the supreme court, challenge to the obamacare law, the second biggest one, on whether states can pay subsidies to people on the exchanges if they did not make their own exchanges themselves. now, here's the thing, like bush v. gore, if the conservative justices on the court follow their own logic, the things they've been saying forever, this never should have come within 100 miles of the supreme court. this entire case was reverse engineered by people who hate the law in an act of tremendous and historical bad faith to destroy it over a slightly ambiguous provision of the statute. and yet here we are in front of the court. and so the question is, does the court basically say, yes, we hate obamacare, and we're going to knock it down, or gut it because we don't like it, or do they stick to the law. i mean, this piece was written. basically saying, to reject the government's defense of the law, the justices would have to suspend their own settled approach

firstnet plans to deploy on top of existing infrastructure first and that makes complete logic, makes perfect logical sense to me except for the fact that states like montana have very limited 4g lte coverage and in fact in tribal lands is virtually nonexistent. what sort of contingency plans do we have for these types of areas like for example the northern cheyenne reservation that doesn't even have 3g service let alone 4g lte and perhaps secretary maybe you can take the first shot at that. >> yeah with your permission senator i would like to allow suit to take this. >> she is smiling. >> first of all i think it's important senator that you know that the public notice that we issued on monday takes a bold step about rural and making sure that rural is taken care of in this total plan. so we know how important it is for states like yourself and so we are spending a lot of time on that particular topic. we also in her first public notice senator asked for public comment on what rural meant because in the legislation it could have different interpretations we want to make sure we have c

the political logic will prevail over the economic logic. >> interesting. >> we will be staying in your going 12 what a question of the day -- going to our twitter question of the day. ♪ >> good morning, everyone. "bloomberg surveillance." time for our morning must read. as we speak to joseph nye we go to one of his former students. netanyahu wrong for 25 years? joseph nye with us. you will appear with him later in the day. let's get out front of doctors a car area -- dr. zakaria. this interesting relationship with israel. i remember 1967 u.s. and academic lived with this for years. what is the new american-israel relationship? >> the american commitment to israel is unchanged. it will be there and is very solid. what is new is the pad relations developing between netanyahu and obama. -- bad relations. that has allowed a degree of political difficulty to enter into the relationship. netanyahu has played this for his political advantage. >> one of my high points in davi os this year was a conversation with the president of egypt. >> i don't think they have adapted very well. there is an

condition lubitz had but we do know that germanwings pilots are apparently only evaluated psych logically once upon hiring as i understand it. how does that compare to other airlines and is there an industry standard? >> that's pretty standard. at least as it relates to the united states. in the united states pilots are only required to go through psychological testing as they are hire and trained and then when they go through their normal physical which depending on their age, either once every six months or once every year. the doctor is expected to ask general questions about how are you feeling are you feeling good and happy, are you depressed? there's no in depth psychological analysis what so much. we should put this this the broader context in the united states we always have rule about you must have two people in the cockpit and in europe up until yesterday, it was no we can live with one person in the cockpit. in other words if one pilot goes to the restroom you don't need a flight attendant to keep watch. that is changing effective immediately at many airlines around the world,

what is your view of the logic of sitting down with iran to begin with? and negotiating to try to prevent the development of nuclear weaponry. i would like to bring your discussion back on shores and ask you to relate to us about the propriety of congress meddling in diplomacy. i'm 61. i may kennedy democrat. i have never seen anything like this. i would like your viewpoint on this. the logic of dealing with iran and of the political propriety of the separation of powers. thank you both. hope you have a great day. guest: two very good and on the point questions conveyed in michigan city. with regard to negotiations with iran, i'm all for resolving these through diplomacy. they she was whether you only have diplomacy or you have war. the question is what sort of diplomacy you have. the united states simply has not used its leverage. by giving the iranians sanctions relief just to keep them at the table come the analogy i would make is like giving a five-year-old dessert first and then asking her to come to the table to eat her spinach. it does make me unea

you think about it more logically and tell us why they chose this.uest: symbolism makes it an obvious target. the coincidence is the current turmoil in greece and the fact that the ecb is intimately involved in what happens there. it makes it appropriate for this kind of dispute to come together. so, you know, people i have spoken to this morning and i mentioned the ecb and putting political pressure on the free government to conform to the austerity regime. it seems logical that this is happening here today. francine: who is rioting? what kind of people are protesting? guy: -- jeff: you have people representing left-wing groups and groups that are part of legitimate unions. i saw a young man in black and a kind of permanent feature of political feature -- protest in this country is ripping up cobblestone's and setting cars on fire. that has been going on in the city and the police spokesman described to me a cat and mouse game with the gangs of these kinds of demonstrators in the city and several different places with the police hunting them. it see

if you accept that as the premise for being pro-life in the first place in the logic will take you to the need for that human being to enjoy the same equal protection as any other cuban being. if you don't accept that premise, if you think there's nothing wrong with abortion because it is not taking a life or you think it is taking a life but not a human life or you think it is taking a human life but not the life of a human person because you distinguish human being from person, not all human beings are persons only some human beings are persons, human beings are persons of they have achieved a certain age or something like that. if you take that view then you have a logically sound reason for your believe that abortion should be legal and even publicly funded but that is not his feeling. governor cuomo's view was he had good reasons for being personally pro-life but those reasons were not sufficient to warrant him supporting the use of public law to protect the right to life of the unborn child and there i think was the fallacy. >> host: why are you conservative? >> guest: i grew up

but now that social logic has changed, and in a way social logic, cultural logic had to change beforeal logic could prevail and courts could actually see the words in front of them. so last piece because i want to leave time for questions. let me conclude with this. 50 years ago congress passed titletitle vii of the sub rights act of 1964, and set us off on a journey in which sex would not be taken into account in the workplace, just as race religion, national origin color would not be permitted to be taken into account. the journey has not been a simple one, and it is not over yet. but, over time, allies increasingly be understood cover many forms of discrimination that the 1964 congress could not have anticipated. it has generated policies and practice on the ground that have advanced gender equity and the law has both shaped and then shaped by social norms. we all need to remain part of this great journey and to do our bit in bringing complete equity to our workplaces. thank you so much for your attention. your engagement, and your scholarship. all of it makes a huge difference. th

. >> senior >> we're holding the belief that they would be considered logical canned candidates and gain residents in in the newly apartments and our city government is being run by an administration comprised by a majority asian american panel few african-americans hold management positions in city government and permitted the lottery system for new housing within district ten. i believe we must play on an even playing field. give everyone access. there must not be a biased agenda in giving seniors of other districts preferential status. >> san francisco has some -- seniors of all races residing in hunters point and bayview a fair shot. >> thank you next speaker, please. >> my name is nancy cross and i was inspired by the presentation by supervisor kim particularly in relations to apartments and apartment fires i've been very apprehensive in brand new buildings there's a failure to observe the the fire code for low income tenants and you will be looking into more because you need so much housing in the low income the advertisements of the apartments say that their modifications on reque

it's the same failed logic on war on drugs.ple in the system, that if the prohibition was removed, maybe they would have more choices. what do you say about that enact. >> wow, you even brought tinder into it. it is like a hookup deal, but nobody is doing a cash transaction for that. kennedy: that is why the application isn't making any money. kennedy: if you have a problem with the act of sexuality -- >> i think people need to do whatever they need to do. you can do whatever you want in your bedroom, you can do that with whoever you want to. but when you make it easy for these people who participate in prostitution, that is where the problem lies. i think that a lot of people are libertarians, i think maybe you have taken it one step too far. kennedy: i don't think of this freedom can never be taken too far and that is the problem. what if this is a choice that you're making in her bedroom with your money? i don't condone it. i've never made folly with the prostitutes, but i hear the would have outlived until you've been with

donald verrilli: that is fair -- they are argument, but the point of the logic of the epa's positionou make the listing decision and then you regulate under section 7412. these are provisions in section 7412 that gives epa the authority. justice alito: are there regulations that set out the categories #--? that without them we don't know. donald verrilli: i do think -- it is going to be based on differences in technology and operation from which you might be able to infer costs. but that is hypothetical because this is not a case in which epa needed to confront the question except with respect to natural gas fired power plants. because it did not have a kind of problem that justice breyer's hypothetical raised. you didn't had that can of problem. you did not need to face this issue in these cases. if i could just make this point it is quite critical. given that 70 4/12 regulatory logic provides for listing based on health, and mission standard-setting based on costs including consideration of costs. and paste on -- given that is exactly the same logic under one program and the motor

which wealth is the means and so he really challenges people to see that again the virtue might be logically the more fundamental thing they need to value and care about living an ethical life more fundamentally than pursuing power and wealth. >> that is a taste of the birth of politics eight greek and roman political ideas and why they matter. there's the cover. you've been watching book tv on c-span2 from princeton university. >> is there an author or book you would like to see featured? the rarely see politicians on the left that have contributed to this impact you see them as champions. but at the time the congress was charging full steam ahead with this law and order approach, then the senator joe biden hoped them along. some of you are old enough to remember the ad. everybody looked at that handset and said that is so incredibly racially charged. it's a scare tactic and a very subtle way and that's pretty much to take on the take on that ad but the fact is in 1988 joe biden got on that boat and picked up the same thing and said it is to lock him up in jail. if you heard what he did eve

what is the logic behind it?the allegations of disappearances by security forces have continued into pena nieto's administration. and not just in tamaulipas but around the country. we were told that there are people who have been released after being held by security forces - but that they rarely speak about the experience...out of fear. but we finally found someone willing to tell us their story. so we had to change cars twice to be able to get here. so we gonna go and talk to this woman who was detained allegedly by the police and taken to a detention center that was run by the police. so this is very important - because it shows in a way. the complicity that exists between security forces and criminal organizations. and how difficult the corruption situation here in this country. she agreed to speak with us if we protected her identity. two months before we met her she was with her son in the car, driving home after work when they were stopped by armed men and thrown into a van. she says she and her son were b

up here and tell you that if we prevail in our interpretation of 36b, they would be obliged by the logic of that opinion to empty out hhs exchanges. so we all agree that there's no connection between 36b and the qualified individual. that's point one. point two is, if you want anomalies, their interpretation of the statute requires 34 states today to lose all medicaid coverage. why is that? because of the provisions on 64a through 66a of the government's brief, there are various requirements that the state, on pain of losing all of its medicaid funds, must coordinate between the state-established exchange, the state agency for chip, and the state agency for medicaid in terms of secure interface and enrollment. now that makes perfect sense if "exchange established by the state" means what it says, but they think it encompasses hhs exchanges. well, the state cannot ensure coordination between hhs exchanges and the state agencies, and none of the 34 are doing it today. so under their atextual reading of the statute, 34 states will suffer the penalty that this court found in nfib as unconsti