a failed logic. a logic where we supported mubarak because we thought the alternative was worse. as mr. sar cosey said in french it's better than the aljeerian taliban, better mubarak than the muslim brotherhood. i reject that not only on the basis of religious freedom issues, but also on the basis of democracy. the second question has to do with how i received it is slightly different than how you presented it a moment ago, your question was harder to answer. i'm going to tell you the question that i understood, was would a regime of liberal democracy including adherence to the principals of religious freedom moderate or unleash the liberal radicalism of some of these voices? the difference in emphasis is the emphasis on liberal democracy as opposed to a regime that highlighted religious freedom. that's a slight variation. my answer is i think this is somewhat similar to some of the excellent discussion that was in panel one this morning was -- i don't know. but i would hope. this is where i would hope to and defer to jillian and mohammed, i would hope that inclusion in the poli

so the logic would be that not only does an inclusive system take away the logic for moderates to have to ally with extremists against repressive system, it also takes away -- introduces more possibilities for the general public at large. so a public that wants to see something other than the incumbent regime now has a whole range of things to choose from. if you want to see a more religiously inspired, morally religiously inspired regime, you don't only have one poll to go to. you have a whole range of different groups to choose from. and here we see historically very significant differents between the muslim brotherhood and i hope you have more about this in the question and answer. it's really very instructive. so i think there are the twin lodge logics. more inclusive system takes away the support base for extremism. it will not eliminate them entirely, even the best functioning democracies we have we don't entirely eliminate extremists. you isolate them. they're fringe factors. they're seen as nut cases, if you will. but they're there. and so if the hope is to eliminate extremism

>> i think there's logic, but it's flawed logic. have been convinced for the past two or three years that the republican base was going to turn out in november of 2012. they have been motivated by hatred of of president obama, and i think that even though we have seen some poor turnout numbers in some of the republican primaries in caucus states, i think in the end, the republican base will turn out strictly on the grounds that they want to get barack obama out of office. and susan makes the correct point, which is that republicans did think at the beginning they could win this argument on religious freedom grounds and they thought they could extend the argument to make it looks like government was trying to tell what you to do, and a big government issue. >> and here is an interview the other day, and mitt romney was asked about the amendment that says if you have a moral objection, you don't have to provide birth control. and he says let's stay out of this one. >> rubio is being debated, i believe, later this week that deals with

>> well, i think there's logic to it although i think it's flawed logic. look, i have been convinced for the past two or three years that the republican base was going to turn out in november of 2012. they have been motivated by hatred of, animus toward president obama and i think that even though we've seen some poor turnout numbers in some of the primary republicans and caucus states, i think in the end the republicans will turn out. the white house believes the republican base will turn out strictly on the grounds they want barack obama out of office. susan makes the correct point, which is that republicans did think at the beginning they could win this argument on religious freedom grounds and they also thought they could extend the argument to try to make it look like president obama was trying to be too intrusive, government telling you what to do, a big government issue. >> here's the republican conundrum, hear an interview of jim heath of ohio news the other day, mitt romney was talked about the blunt amendment, the amendment that says if you have

the logic would be that not only does an inclusive system take away the logic for of moderates to have to ally with extremists against a repressive system, it introduces more possibilities for the general public at large. a public that wants to see something other than the incumbent regime now has a whole range of things to choose from. if you want to choose a more religiously inspired, you do not only have one place to go. you have a whole range of different groups to choose from. here we see very significant differences. we will have more about this and the question and answer because it is instructive. the logic and alliances among the elite -- a more inclusive system takes away the support system for extremism. it will not eliminate them entirely. even the best funds in the market these we have, we do not entirely eliminate extremists. we do isolate them. but they are there. a the hope is to eliminate extremism in an inclusive system entirely. that simply is not going to happen. >> the second side of what i want to talk about has to do with the expression of religion and religious

the bears are caught in the jaws of their own logic. today we left behind a whole bunch of hobbled and dazed kodiaks. wondering what the heck happened to their best arguments. bears, i got a message for you. look out, the bulls have your play book. they know your dens. they know where you hunt. they've got traps set just about everywhere you step. what can i say? right now the bulls, they're just plain smarter than the average bear. let's go to merrell in ohio. merrell! >> caller: hi, jim, how you doing? >> pretty good, sport. how you doing? >> caller: good. i was reading a czechoslovakian cookbook and i discovered where booyah came from. >> really? >> caller: it's a stew made with vegetables and rabbit and squirrel and stuff like that. >> i was reading a book and it turned out to be mad. >> caller: cisco, is that a buy or hold or sell? what do you think is going on there? >> i'm confused myself. i said, look, i got to tell you, i need some focus. then i was talking to deborah borger, doing a video at thestreet.com and i said i don't kn

or something we would describe today perhaps -- we would use no.er logical terms? this phenomenon you talked about happens of course with people today. are you saying that the demons of yesteryear are the same as the demons of today. they are spiritual in mate and can be exstore -- exor siesed as jesus did. >> some of the complaints we associate with compulsive disorders, obsessions or addictions are exactly what we are seeing as bng caused by demons in the ancient world. i also believe there is an important element of wisdom in the ancient teaching, namely, that not all of our mall adjustments are caused by physical problems. sometimes those are interior matters of the state of the soul. as a matter of fact, learning how to deal with the evil that afflicts our own hearts is one of the functions of growing up in to becoming a full human being. exorism unfortunately today has a reputation of being some kind of bizarre event. in the ancient world, it was the way in which you address evil where it began, namely, in the human heart. >> after jesus ebbor siesed here, sh

what would be the logic, then in making the lead organization the department of homeland security? >> senator, i think the issue, if i could, i want to break this out into three areas to make sure my responses -- >> make it brief. i have additional questions. >> yes, sir. i see three major things. we want dhs to take the lead on resilience and working with civilian agencies in critical infrastructure. we want d.o.d. to take the lead on defending the nation under cyberattack, fbi under law enforcement, and intelligence. and i think all three of us are need to work together as a joint team to move this forward. if we don't work as a team, then the nation suffers. so inside the united states, that's where i think dhs has the lead. they don't in terms of the foreign and the things coming in, that's where you'd want us to have the lead. >> how many people are under your command? >> in cybercommand, counting our service components, a little under 13,000. >> so we now have 13,000 in cybercommand recently formed up, so now we need other agencies. why shouldn't the responsibility lay with -

a failed logic of the past.a logic in which we supported mubarak because we thought the alternative was worse, or as mr. sarkozy said in france, it's better to have -- better to have mubarak than the muslim brotherhood. i reject that not only on the basis of religious freedom issues but on the basis of my commitment to democracy. the second question has to do with, and i think how i received it was slightly different than how you presented it, a moment ago in your question was hard to answer, some going to tell you the question that i understood, was would a regime of liberal democracy, including adherence to the principles of religious freedom, moderate or unleash the liberal radicalism, somebody's voice? the difference is the emphasis upon liberal democracy as opposed to a regime that highlighted religious freedom. that's a slight variation. and my answer is, and i think this is somewhat similar to some of the excellent discussion that was in panel one this morning, was i don't know, but i would hope, i would

not to mention threes point out some of the problems with paul's logic here the tax breaks that the oil industry enjoys our corporate welfare so by asking them to actually pay their fair share of taxes instead of getting to use loopholes that amount to welfare something that someone of paul's ideology normally would be opposed to well that's not punishment it's bringing things back to where they're supposed to be but now a big part of paul's argument is that we shouldn't be penalizing the job creators. your company employs nine point two million people we don't need to heap punishment on them we need to give them encourage men to employ more people. fortunately for paul the oil companies don't exactly employed nine point two million people the entire industry including minimum wage workers only adds up to two point two million jobs nine point he was a huge expansion that includes ripple effects which are not truly part of the industry a look and it's not just the fact that paul is wrong about he also fails to mention that between two thousand and five and twenty ten p.p. chevron shell a

are made on the decisions, and then the logic comes in of why that is making sense to do it, and thenhe arguments of back filled logic is a mistake. >> and now they currently work with 20 retailers across the country, but in addition to their own shop which they man in new york, only four stores are selling their dresses in s significant numbers. >> you have to look at what is working and patterns of success that you pursue. so no leverage. every 90 days, you sit down, what is working and what is not working. whatever is not working, you have to quickly as possible, get rid of it. whatever is working, quickly as possible, expand on it. mike summed up the meeting with a couple of thoughts. we have a lot of fixes coming your way, and the good news is that it is about doing less. the stuff that you are doing now, you have to have the courage to stop doing. we will show you how to focus in on the few things, and your business will turn, i promise you. >> and then we brought in the owner of s3 communications. while the brothers were out of town the week before, denise and i snuck into the

. >> is out what the logic was? -- that what the logic was? >> somehow it came up like that. i just do not know where it came to. >> the numbers do not work if you have 38 our ships. somebody is not working an eight hour shift -- 3 8 hour shifts. somebody is not working and eight hour shift. -- an eight hour shift. >> i work for 600 franchisees. the fast food business is competitive. the margin is small. approximately 8%. these hours are important because of the clientele, the young folks coming from the movie house. the guy who is hungry. >> i do not know any movie houses that close at 2:00. maybe when they are showing "rocky horro." r." >> you mentioned you need that to stay open and be viable but there are only 50 people. on friday and saturday, d you have those numbers? >> 50 transactions per hour. >> that is every day? is the weekend fire. >> less on week days. >> and you operate other locations that have 24-hour? >> yes. commissioner hillis: to those other locations do as well? or is this a better location? >> other locations do better than this location. >> i need a li

so in theory it plays to romney's strength ideal logically. >> we know in these primaries, if there haseen a lot of early voting that romney has done well. what does the early vote look like? >> it has been significantly up for the republicans compared to recent years. no surprise. actually republican early votes is up where around 40%, and at least in the suburbs of cook county compared to four years ago, and i think that has something to do with folks having a sense of well maybe we could have a little bit of impact on the presidential race. this is really the big item except for a few somewhat interesting local legislative races and a couple of fairly interesting congressional primaries. so i would suspect that romney east organization has played a part in voting early, and in theory those should be romney votes. >> the momentum that he has coming off of other significant states, the money, the message, obviously the amount of money he is spending on the air, and his ability to organize should mean that he takes it well. now, in your opinion, what would he have to win by in the end i

it says it is almost a logical because they have to be -- there has to be safeguards. it may seem the fact that safeguards are needed that number 3 should be given some weight. without the safeguards, the problem exists but the only way to mitigate that is with safeguards. once those people are a block away from that the establishment, we're going to assume that not everyone can park there. these problems would arise. >> that makes sense to a certain extent but if we used to that across the board, anybody coming to us with a plan that might and board -- invite more people than any building might handle, we would have to deny based on your reasoning. what we do is suggest they will mitigate those problems with this security plan and then they will demonstrate how they can manage more people at any one time. >> it seems analogous to the problem that developed with the individual who was one -- runover is not to be laid at the feet of the restaurant because it happened away from the restaurant as though there is no nexus between us to review zero events. -- those two even

after all, every country needs logical, curious young minds, not just armenia.hat hundreds of thousands of people in many european countries rallying against austerity measures. another effect of the debt crisis. people across europe are united in their anger and frustration, well beyond the borders of the eurozone. when romania's prime minister step down earlier this year, he was just the latest victim of protests. many governments have tumbled since the crisis began. many romanians blamed him for making them tighten their belts so much that it became impossible to breathe. one romanian who launched the protest movement with a spectacular act. >> when he turns on his television, old feelings come flooding back. is there, fear of death, pain, but also pride and relief. he sees the crowds protesting in his city against the romanian government's budget cuts to bring the country's debt under control. is the first person to protest, and it almost cost him his life. his lone action took place on december 23, 2010, during iranian parliamentary session. he threw himsel

he is completely image logical. just faith in bill maher but abandoned reason, too. they have absolutely nothing to offer this country. yet they are too vitriole who argue about these faith and reason. i look forward to debating in the senate all the folks on the left. you saw them. barbara boxer, we would be end debate, she wouldn't want to debate with us because he were the party of reason. the left is bunch of emotion and trying to insight people and we're going stand up for people that made this country great, that is science, reason and faith have a roll in the public square. >> sean: are you prepared to take this to the convention? >> we need to nominate a conservative. if we don't noey nominate a conservative, we nominated mccain, gerald ford. we lost every one of those races. i understand why the media wants romney because they know obama can beat him. we need a reagan conservative. that is why we're going to stick this out and we're going to win it. >> sean: senator santorum, we appreciate you being with us

you know if they use that logic in the past why wouldn't have i here because you have a supreme court attention majority that is very skittish to say that someone who murders another person. shouldn't get life without parole they look more at the crime as opposed to the person now the lawyer for the two teenagers who were at the court today is bryan stevenson he's with the equal justice initiative and he's a big juvenile justice reformer he went forward with this is that with the statistics you cited and said these are these kids they're not capable of fully understanding the ramifications of what they're doing and we have lots of this is there's lots of social science about this and if you commit these murders we should be we should not hold them accountable for the rest of their lives and ruin all chances of growth or redemption or rehabilitation. yeah i mean i guess i'd always have to say that i you know i agree with him here but you know it's interesting we mentioned that we have the supreme court justice there skittish about this stuff because if you think about it on a global sc

that have been sentenced this way despite their logical science psychological evidence that proves that young people have more capacity to change are not fully developed so which way that sound like the court was going today we're discussing with me is mike sacks supreme court correspondent for the huffington post i thank so much for joining us tonight quickly can you just give us a few details about these two cases today right so the cases emerge out of the courts of alabama and arkansas both of which have mandatory life without parole sentence and schemes for any capital murder for those below the age of majority so with with the miller case we had a boy who did a pretty. it's a crime he and a friend with a baseball bat a neighbor a fifty two year old neighbor in his trailer and then set the trailer on fire and left the guy to die the other case the jackson case coming out of coming out of arkansas concerns a boy who was just accessory to an attempted robbery and in that robbery the video clerk did not have the money that they wanted so one of the boys who was during the robbery shot

i don't know logically what in the world they're talking about. if the american people or each of you need another demonstration what it is then you're all brain dead. >> you take up the house bill. last week you said -- what's changed? >> well, i think a vote of 390 to 93 was fairly significant in my thought process. >> senator harry reid on capitol hill earlier today. in a moment we'll hear from mitch mcconnell. pat leahy weighing in on this as well saying that the president is being held to a different standard. you may elect him but we're going to hold him to a different standard, senator leahy saying that's wrong in regards to these 17 judicial nominations. senator mitch mcconnell saying that the jobs bill should be next. >> on judicial nominations. on the judicial nominations, you called it a manufactured crisis. if you want to move on to jobs and many of the judges, the nominations are pretty noncontroversial why not drop the filibusters on the judges so you can move to jobs. >> i think the best way to put it's a solution in search of a pro

or something we would describe today perhaps -- we would use no.er logical terms? this phenomenon you talked about happens of course with people today. are you saying that the demons of yesteryear are the same as the demons of today. they are spiritual in mate and can be exstore -- exor siesed as jesus did. >> some of the complaints we associate with compulsive disorders, obsessions or addictions are exactly what we are seeing as being caused by demons in the ancient world. i also believe there is an important element of wisdom in the ancient teaching, namely, that not all of our mall adjustments are caused by physical problems. sometimes those are interior matters of the state of the soul. as a matter of fact, learning how to deal with the evil that afflicts our own hearts is one of the functions of growing up in to becoming a full human being. exorism unfortunately today has a reputation of being some kind of bizarre event. in the ancient world, it was the way in which you address evil where it began, namely, in the human heart. >> after jesus ebbor siesed here,

that is why single payer becomes the logical -- >> is the mandate that tax? they talked about that. >> nobody questions, clement or any of the libertarian scholars, whether congress has the power to levy a tax. i think a single pair becomes an act just as the logical, but the inevitable next stop. >> is a mandate a tax? >> according to the president of the united states, absolutely not. he kept saying over and over again -- >> he said it it is not a tax increase. >> he had to pretend it is not a tax because the americans to like taxes. he had to pretend that there would be no tax increases, etc. what happened this week is beyond health care. hinge a constitutional chang point in history. colby spoke about the new deal. for six to seven years it has been assumed that we can expand the power of government. the reason liberals were so shocked by what happened in the court today -- remember nancy pelosi dismissed questions about constitutionality, saying all but of course ideas constitutional." it was dismissed when the first objections were raised -- >> excuse m

text to study or to think about the urban crisis and also again we use the wire for the sober owe logical presentation it gives us of post war american cities and also to ask questions of it because it gives us this window into the post war city through the police procedural, right, through fighting crime or through police and criminals which allows us to see a great many things, but it also occludss and side so we use it for what it does and what it doesn't do. today's lecture is more or less a historical overview of the origins of the urban crisis and that comes from the title of a book 1995 book by thomas sigrew and you read an excerpt. it is the origins of the urban crisis and he concentrated on detroit, and that is where i am using the title of the lecture. what will this lecture do? it does about five things. one, it will give an overview of the concept of the post war urban crisis. what does that term mean? two, we will do some historical contrasts between what arnold hish referred to as the black enclaves or black communities or maybe you call it the first ghetto and what he label

. >> if the logic that's driving you is the logic of racial insensitivity and as ms.but an important social critic, she's argued the principles and practices and procedures of those of us trying to make arguments on either side of the aisle whether you're democrat or republican, liberal or conservative, when we talk about these issue, we're speak about human beings here. to assault and suggest they are somehow less than worthy of consideration because they don't happen to agree with you is really crass and indifferent to the protocols of logic of those of us in the academy and media abide by. rush limbaugh is being called on on his madness and mess. those of us standing out here have to be willing to take whatever assault he give to us. you cannot dpo around beating up on people of color. you can't beat up on women. you can't beat up on people that don't agree with you. white men shoultd speak up. not just women and people of color. white men should speak up. >> here is the other thing. what limbaugh does is so dangerous. what we're trying to do is have a conversation

but it defies logic what was recorded on those tapes. you need to be about psychiatrist to figure it all out. he was under investigation for at least 18 months prior to his arrest. and he knew this as well. perhaps he did not think he was doing or saying anything wrong or he had a very long lapse of judgment. the last picture we saw of him leaning against the car is a sad picture because he knows he is going away with a loss of freedom. his family is all he has and there is some much uncertainty new li it may well be that he remains in prison for the full 14 years. >>weak kick we cannot we cannot forget that comment about what he had been "f-ing golden!" ... as a politician he was a good one ... however ... we go to the newsroom ... >>if you didn't know any better you think that former gov. rod blagojevich was going on vacation today. but he had no luggage and he had a one-way ticket he will not return for quite some time. before his car could pilaf he was greeted by supporters at o'hare airport this morning he stopped to sign books and

excitement and energy that's turning their platform into a content rich ecosystem and with the recent logic and its latest version of ice cream sandwich it's likely only going to grow. but despite what it looks like it's more than just money games for those committed to the further development of enjoy all the apps and other developments are useless if your mobile device is corrupted by malware or even worse stolen as a platform grows in popularity the threats to android based products are on the rise as well just last december security firms build an explosion in the number of programs targeting androids open operating systems to guard against those increasing risks there's one russian company that announced their response to these would be bad guys. with a long time now we've had a product a small fire which protects users of such devices. security and this year we've expanded our product range to cover topics by introducing kaspersky tablet security now this program is a one stop shop for protecting your device as you might expect because of the powerful antivirus program upon which cons

out of the crisis and developing a fascination with these five settlement very well balanced and logical who would speak against ending about it on all sides of the conflict whereas it had been previously said that the syrian government had to stop its aggression as if it was the only one guilty of it that special envoy kofi annan proposal also mentioned the pilots association by science demonstrates a well balanced approach to the issue of having. stop violence not only on the part of the state but other sides of the conflict as well. is there an inflow of refugees from syria to lebanon today. there is a lot of this reporting on this issue tonight some allege there are twenty thousand thirty thousand or even forty thousand refugees but those are dramatically inflated figures refugees come to lebanon from neighboring areas in syria where there is fighting at the moment this can happen in any country people are trying to stay alive they are seeking shelter with relatives or friends who live across the border officially there are a few hundred refugees maybe some two thousand or three thou

. >> do you think they did so logically? >> i don't think there's any logic to the government's position to begin with. >> do you think it's all right to argue both sides of this? >> no, i do not. >> any other justices -- [ inaudible ]. >> well, i'm hesitant to go ahead and predict which way the justices are going to go. i know that all of them yesterday had concerns about the definition of the tax and the anti-injunction act. i know justice kennedy made several comments that fundamentally changes the relationship between individuals, american, and their government. and that is very telling. because that's the whole thing we've been trying to say. this is a game changer. this has never happened before, and justice roberts reinforced that when he said it doesn't matter if congress chooses to force people to buy karen insurance, burial insurance or engage in some other commodity. he said once we allow them the power to regulate the health insurance industry, and health care insurance, rather,stinnish. it's a slippery slope. th