then we have the fix with comey and the fix with loretta lynch on the tarmac. anything the clintons don't try to fix? >> the democrats have been pointed their fingerer at president trump that he had a fix in with russia. all of the evidence, sean, points to the democrats and russia. this is beyond partisan. the remove of the gross negligence, agents in the fbi, since last july, they were up in arms. they were so frustrated. they didn't understand what was going on here. one thing they did understand, there was some kind of fix. they wanted to figure out why did comey do this. now there is more evidence shedding light on this. >> sean: john, let's go back to your reporting. you updated your column earlier today. the latest news. >> it wasn't just a single time they mentioned this term. gross negligence, they said one of the things that strikes us is there were lots of secret information that passed through that pattern. putting that in emails concerned them as evidence of what was going wrong here. it was not an accidental term. it was thought through in may and

was he pressures by loretta lynch or others to absolve and clear hillary clinton.be obstruction of justice. judge jeanine: when you put that alongside the fact that this exoneration draft memo was written 6, 7 weeks before 17 witnesses before the target hillary was even interviewed. that's further corroborating circumstantial evidence that intent of james comey was to protect hillary clinton. i heard people on this channel say they do it all the time. it has never been done. i have done this for 32 years. i have been a prosecutor and a judge. i have never ever written an exoneration before most of of the witnesses are interviewed. this is corruption. i'm sorry, i can prove this to a jury. gregg: i have been a lawyer 37 years. i have never seen it or heard of it. not only do is comey misinterpret gross negligence. this another statute hillary clinton seems to have violated. willingly and knowingly seems to have mishandled classified documents. in this news conference james comey said she didn't intend to break the law. that's not the legal test. the test is did she

certainly we heard a lot of stories about what the attorney general, loretta lynch, was doing behind the scenes to tamp down any discussion of what hillary clinton had been up to and trying to spin things in a way that's atypical for an attorney general. the justice department is the gold standard for objectivity. and this undercuts the administration of justice. lou: do you think the department of justice is the gold standard after we looked at the fbi, ignoring the a pay-for-play sinister clinton foundation that was obviously working for the clintons, personal gain as well as against the national interest. >> we heard a lot about the justice department the last 8 years and not all of it is good. i'm hopeful people on the hill will lift you have the hood and look understood it to find out what happened. i think the vast majority of justice department employees are honest brokers doing their job every day. the fact that there may be some bad apples in there i don't think thud taint the overall -- should taint the overall good justice department tries to .every day. lou: i look at ben

we have the email thanks to judicial watch from loretta lynch threatening mr.ampbell, threatening this informant saying if you don't keep to your non-disclosure agreement, i will get you imprisoned. we have an acting a.g. threatening an american citizen to keep your mouth shut about what you know about the uranium deal. that's pretty damning evidence. david: thank you for being here. president trump says the chinese decision to send an envoy to north korea for talks is a big move. david: in our online poll last night we asked do you think the d.o.j. is reluctant to investigate children tomorrow corruption because it would ex goes corruption within its leadership and 93% of you said yes. china is sending an envoy to pyongyang. first from china to visit in two years. president trump on twitter called it a quote big move. joining me now is fred fleitz, former chief of staff to ambassador john bolton. will the envoy make any difference? >> this is a significant development and i think it stems from the president's successful trip to asia. north korea and china have

we have the email thanks to judicial watch from loretta lynch threatening mr. threatening this informant saying if you don't keep to your non-disclosure agreement, i will get you imprisoned. we have an acting a.g. threatening an american citizen to keep your mouth shut about what you know about the uranium deal. that's pretty damning evidence. david: thank you for being here. president trump says the chinese decision to send an envoy to north korea for talks is a big move. (group conversation) ♪wooooo oo waa ahhh ♪it's a beautiful mornin' thank you ♪ahhh, ah ahhh ♪each bird helping small businesses. damage your vehicle? we got you covered. [ glass shatters ] property damage? that's what general liability's for. what?! -injured employee? -ow. workers' comp helps you pay for a replacement. what's happening? this is carla. how's it going? and if anything comes up, our experts are standing by. ♪ boo! ♪ it's time for the sleep number semi-annual sale on the only bed that adjusts on both sides to your ideal comfort your sleep number setting. and snoring? does your be

we have the email thanks to judicial watch from loretta lynch threatening mr.pbell, threatening this informant saying if you don't keep to your non-disclosure agreement, i will get you imprisoned. we have an acting a.g. threatening an american citizen to keep your mouth shut about what you know about the uranium deal. that's pretty damning evidence. david: thank you for being here. president trump says the chinese decision to send an envoy to north korea for talks is a big move. whoooo. looking for a hotel that fits... ...your budget? tripadvisor now searches over... ...200 sites to find you the... ...hotel you want at the lowest price. grazi, gino! find a price that fits. tripadvisor. show of hands. let's get started. who wants customizable options chains? ones that make it fast and easy to analyze and take action? how about some of the lowest options fees? are you raising your hand? good then it's time for power e*trade the platform, price and service that gives you the edge you need. alright one quick game of rock, paper, scissors. 1, 2, 3, go. e*trade. the

we have the email thanks to judicial watch from loretta lynch threatening mr.l, threatening this informant saying if you don't keep to your non-disclosure agreement, i will get you imprisoned. we have an acting a.g. threatening an american citizen to keep your mouth shut about what you know about the uranium deal. that's pretty damning evidence. david: thank you for being here. president trump says the chinese decision to send an envoy to north korea for talks is a big move. ♪ ♪ i can do more to lower my a1c. because my body can still make its own insulin. and i take trulicity once a week to activate my body to release it, like it's supposed to. trulicity is not insulin. it comes in a once-weekly, truly easy-to-use pen. the pen where you don't have to see or handle a needle. and it works 24/7. trulicity is a once-weekly injectable medicine to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. it should not be the first medicine to treat diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take trulicity

was he pressures by loretta lynch or others to absolve and clear hillary clinton.swer is yes, that would be obstruction of justice. judge jeanine: when you put that alongside the fact that this exoneration draft memo was written 6, 7 weeks before 17 witnesses before the target hillary was even interviewed. that's further corroborating circumstantial evidence that intent of james comey was to protect hillary clinton. i heard people on this channel say they do it all the time. it has never been done. i have done this for 32 years. i have been a prosecutor and a judge. i have never ever written an exoneration before most of of the witnesses are interviewed. this is corruption. i'm sorry, i can prove this to a jury. gregg: i have been a lawyer 37 years. i have never seen it or heard of it. not only do is comey misinterpret gross negligence. this another statute hillary clinton seems to have violated. willingly and knowingly seems to have mishandled classified documents. in this news conference james comey said she didn't intend to break the law. that's not the legal te

i'm thinking of her husband meeting with loretta lynch or loretta lynch targeting opponents of hers.> the clintons do whatever they want to do and they don't get in trouble. >> there are two more companies that are going bottom up and collapsing. why are they collapsing? maybe because hillary clinton is not president anymore. the clintons have lost a lot of friends in the last few months. the "new york times" this morning called a dozen different liberal groups and said who is willing to defend bill clinton, and they got nothing. but. they emailed their own staff list necessity would have gone the a bert response. kennedy: the claims of abuse of power, all she is doing is attacking the administration. but she is not really offering an excuse or explanation for hundreds of millions of dollars that went into the clinton foundation because the of the deals we are talking about here. >> this is the right-wing conspiracy or old news. it's usually one of those. now they are going with the whole left wing game in general. that's donald trump is a dictator. it doesn't explain anything. it ha

bill clinton met with loretta lynch for 40 minutes only days before comey's decision all they talked about was their grandkids. the fix was in. and the you you you are rang yue deal. and also the massive plot that the fbi uncovered one year before that deal was approved which includes bribery, extortion, money laundering, kickbacks, racketeering. key members of the obama administration knew this was happening. yet they decided to give 20% of america's uranium to russia and to putin. the fix was in. even lindsey graham is now calling for a special council. actually two special councils. all of these prove that the clintons believe they are above the law and they are protected by the democrats and a colliding media. but one is calling them out. donna brazil continues to expos this political machine on a level nobody ever knew existed. hillary, rigged, stole the democratic primary, stole the democratic nomination and donna brazil is continuing to tell her story. entitled inside hillary clinton's secret take over of the dnc and she found evidence, "hillary rigged the dnc." she also revea

during the course of the investigation, the attorney general, loretta lynch asked?ames comey, don't call this an investigation, call it a matter. take the clinton talking points and comey willfully comply. then one week before james comey announced the fbi's decision on whether or not to pursue charges against hillary clinton,be then-attorney general loretta lynch, who you can see right here, former president bill clinton, they had that meeting on the tarmac for private meeting lasting 40 minutes. when pressed about it, she said we were only talking innocent small talk about golf and our grandchildren. after a week, comey announced the fbi would not recommend charges for hillary clinton,ou even though he spent a good 13.5 minutes explaining how clinton had top-secret, special access program, classified information stored on that unsecured server that anyone could have hacked. and by the way, we believe five foreign intelligence agencies did, and we also have since found out that the original draft of comey's announcement described clinton's actions as grossly neglig

the loretta lynch meeting and changing the language and making decisions ahead of time, and i am toldmy sourcess tonight this is only going to get worse, the fix was in, as i've beence saying. what about the republican house and senate investigators today launching their effort to secure the evidence from federal agencies about this uranium one deal, the corruption case, as they prepare to interview the fbi informant connect this informant was telling the fbi a year and a half for four uranium one that there was a network inn the united states. he had his own experience, he had emails, he had documents. he had tapes where he knew bribery, extortion, money laundering, racketeering was all happening. >> not only that, sean. you drew up, your slides yesterday were magnificent. those should be used in the court of law to prosecute everybody involved with uranium one who undermined the american national security. the fact here is we have a very, very serious issue of not only is the law being done, but is it seemed to be done as well? is justice blind, or is there special preferential trea

one of them is we sent loretta lynch a letter related to sober homes and a predicament and the predix sment is fairly straightforward. if -- and her answer to be honest to chairman goodlatte and the rest of us was not sfaerry and we've given your staff a copy of it. sober living homes are nothing but boarding houses, they're required to provide no care whatsoever to the alcoholic or recovering drug abuser because that has to be done somewhere else or they don't qualify as sober homes. and yet, currently, there is in the ninth circuit decisions that cause cities to be unable to regulate them in a way that would prevent people from simply buying houses in a row in a very prestigious neighborhood and turning them into these, if you will, sober living homes, again boarding houses with 15 or more people. will you agree to work with us to try to find an appropriate way to align your enforcement of the americans with disability act and your enforcement of the fair housing act, with the necessity for cities to be able to essentially regulate how many people live in a home? >> yes. i would be

before he ever did an investigation.wh the fix was in on the tarmac when bill clinton met with loretta lynchere's a lot of fixing the clinton is involved in. your reaction after the fact? >> gai, and organization i was a chairman of , we did the clinton cash book and drill down on uranium one to find all the nefarious activities around that that we hope that the judiciary committee and eventually the attorney general sessions -- i hope he appoints a special counsel, a special prosecutor to go after that. what you are seeing in the democratic party, the corruption of it, is we started a triple war in europe and part of this for the last eight or nine years. that's how eric cantor got blown out as a republican leader. that is how so many seats were won of the congressional level in the house and congress by conservatives. so the conservative movement has really been at war with the republican establishment, this kind of internal civil war, for many, many years. the democrats haven't done it. i said from day one that bernie sanders, the campaign against hillary clinton, the thing was rigged. yo

have the authority and the duty and the responsibility to make that decision. >> as it relates to loretta lynch using pseudonym are you recused on that matter? >> i don't think so. >> fusion gps matter? >> i am not able to comment about that. i would say in defense of attorney general lynch i use the same -- i have a pseudonym, also. i understand all officials do. probably have been following the advice of the department of justice. >> so i just want to be clear that as it relates to the matter you do believe you have the authority to appoint a special counsel and do not believe that that authority that you have is subject to any recusal at this time? >> i cannot say that. >> the chair recognizes the gentleman from california. >> hello, mr. sessions. >> yes. >> donald trump has asked various individuals to pledge an oath of loyalty to him. did donald trump ever ask you to pledge an oath of loyalty to him? >> no. >> if donald trump were to ask you to pledge loyalty to him would you do so? >> well, i don't want to pledge loyalty oath -- we all owe loyalty to our supervisors. i have always done th

is loretta lynch wrong? wasn't wrong, the meeting on the tarmac? >> the answer is no.lked about grandchildren. >> sean: according to you. do you believe that? i don't. >> that's what both of them said. >> sean: i did not have sex with that woman, not one time. known for lying. >> you asked me about james comey, let's talk about that. now we can all agree, james comey acted unethically to offer opinion on hillary clinton as the head of the fbi. what he did was a firing offense. he had no right to offer -- >> sean: fair answer. we agree. next question, counselor. >> james comey's lack of judgment and exit nomadic ethic. >> why do you believe the guy that said i did not with her a single time, lied to her face, hillary as light for a year about the dossier. why should we believe the clintons, why do you believe the clintons with their history of lies? if they lie a lot, and they have been caught a lot. >> compared to the president of the united states, who i think we are up to over 1,000 currently. the inauguration -- in the history of america. the answer is that the clin

one of them is we sent loretta lynch a letter related to sober homes. and a predicament. it is fairly straightforward. and her answer to be honest to chairman goodlatte and the rest of us, was not satisfactory. and we've given your staff a copy of it. sober living homes are boarding house. they don't provide anything. that has to be done somewhere else. and yet currently there is circuit decisions that cause cities to be unable to regulate them in a way that would prevent people from simply buying houses in a row in a very prestigious neighborhood and turning them into these, if you will, sober living homes which are boarding houses with 15 or more people. would you agree with us to try to find an appropriate way to align your enforcement of the americans with disability act and your enforcement of the fair housing act with the necessity for cities to be able to essentially regulate how many people live in a home? >> yes. i would be pleased to do that. these are important issues because a lot of money is being spent and some of it not wisely in these areas. >> a lot of it

we know loretta lynch one day before the benghazi report came out five days before secretary clinton was scheduled to be interviewed by the fbi met with former president bill clinton on the tarmac in phoenix. we know after that meeting when he was corresponding with public relations people, he was using the name elizabeth carlisle. as i've said before, seems to me you just talking golf and grandkids, you can use your real name. we know that mr. comey publicize the investigation and we know he made the final decision on whether prosecutor or not. and then when he gets fired, he leaks a government document through a friend to "the new york times" and what was his goal? to create momentum for a special counsel and it can't just be any special counsel, of it's got te robert mueller, the same who is now involved we now learn in ths whole investigation with the informant regarding russian businesses wanted to do business in the uranium business in the united states regarding the uranium one deal. i guess my main question is what is it going to take, not to mention the dossier information,

we know loretta lynch, one day before the benghazi report came out. five days before clinton was setskeledled to be interviewed with the f.b.i. met with former president christianton in phoenix. we know at that meeting the justice department, she was using the name elizabeth carlyle. as i said before seems to me if you are talking golf and grandkids, you can probably use your real name. we know that mr. comey publicized the investigation and we know he made the final decision on whether to prosecute or not. and then when he gets fired, he leaks a government document through a friend to the "new york times." what was his goal? to create momentum for a special counsel. it can't just be any special counsel, it's got to be bob mueller, his best friend, predecessor. same bob mueller involved in this whole investigation with the informant regarding russian businesses wanting to do business here in the united states regarding the iranian deal. i guess my main question is what's it going to take if all that, not to mention the dossier information, what's it g

charged in civilian criminal court not as enemy combatants you said in reaction to that it is this loretta lynch obama's attorney general never left, is this president and his administration are they too soft on trer cases. >> i think the president has got the right attitude about fighting the war on terror i completed him for taking gloves off when it comes to military but clearly the trump administration doing exactly what obama administration did hard to catch a terrorist alive, chris can when you do should try to gather intelligence i don't mind trying this guy in new york court you new york terrorist i wanted to hold him a long erode of time let military cia interrogate him many about what he knows about terrorism how he got radicalized he said a soldier of the cat faith, we taxed to him for one day in the hospital -- reed miranda rights throw him in court can't get intelligence going forward because now he has been lawyered up, and that is us exactly what obama did so when it comes to trump policy, they are using k obama's playbook got a lot of obama people held over, and i want to see tha

finally, jim comey and how loretta lynch and all that crew handled the hillary clinton investigation. the letter that you just mentioned sessions says there is an i.g. investigation. that has been going on for almost a year. i think the american people want answers because that was one of the most high-profile cases the justice department has done in the last quarter century and yet i don't think they did it in a way that inspires much confidence from anybody. >> sandra: a lot of what you just detailed we're going to hear republicans bringing that up in that room this morning. democrats are probably going to bring up george papadopoulos. the former trump advisor who pled guilty to lying to the f.b.i. about offering to arrange for this meeting between donald trump and vladimir putin. what do you expect to hear from democrats on this this morning? >> i think they will probably try to focus on sessions whether he met with the ambassador, all his previous testimony. they may bring up papadopoulos. there needs to be said. there was no underlying misconduct with papadopoulos. he said he had

demanded in a letter to attorney general jeff sessions to appoint a special counsel to investigate loretta lynchjames comey and hillary clinton. lou: you don't know which way the wind is blowing with jeff sessions. who is lindsey graham? he has no committee standing? he's a favorite on sunday talk shows. but beyond that not much else. where do we go the get justice? we found out according to the most of recent reporting of sarah carter that jeff sessions the attorney general has not recused himself on the matter of uranium one. gregg: even though he said so three times in his confirmation hearing. i take it as good news there is a continuing investigation of hillary clinton and corrupt pay-to-play in the uranium one deal. there is plenty of evidence there. but they also ought to add the goes fusion dossier as well as the rigging of the nomination. all of those things. lou: i wish i had great confidence in congressional investigations of anything. emily, and gregg jarrett, thank you for being with us tonight. chris farrell will joioioioioi >> virginia, we have witnessed yet another democratic swe

there is evidence james comey and loretta lynch were protecting hillary clinton.ou: you get that in the testimony of the fired fbi director himself. >> both of those are clear violations of the espionage act. lou: we have the situation where we have a second special counsel investigating the first special counsel. gregg: to the extent robert mueller covered it up, the uranium one, it should be investigated. lou: we are talking about a farce cube. and it's clear because of the conflicts that exist in the appointment of this first special counsel, that the justice department itself is so conflicted you can't rely on the justice department to investigate the clinton foundation, the clinton emails, and the cover-up if it indeed is that by these conflict officials at the top of the justice department. gregg: sessions cannot ably perform his job because he has too many conflicts. gregg: alex acosta, labor secretary. fine lawyer. clerked for sam alito. under the vacancies reform act, the president can appoints him as the new attorney general. he can step in day one and c

why wasn't it so critical and so important that loretta lynch use her real name. why was it so important we have special counsel and it be bob mueller. the government document. why was this all so important? all we're asking for is to name a special couple to look into this. we asked for this. 0 members of the judiciary committee laying out all these questions and saying, name a special counsel to look into it. the american people would like the answers. i know the people in the th zreck of ohio would like to know. and asking about the july 2 letter and would they a.a special counsel. to date, we have no answer, no response. and i appreciate my good friend from florida and the gentleman from north carolina and the gentleman from pennsylvania, the gentleman from pennsylvania. it is time for a special counsel to be named to get the answers on these fundamental questions. there are lots of other questions. but these are the fundamental ones. it is time we have to get to the bottom of this. and we hope it does and the ooner, the better. mr. biggs: i yield to mr. meado

he has to rely on a group of bureaucrats in the justice department who were helping holder and loretta lynchaucracy who will be working with the crusader such as the person we are talking about would still be imbued with that spirit that held up investigation of democrats. >> i would rather rely on the judgment of attorney general sessions than abdicate and turn it over to a mueller. do you want another out-of-control independent witch hunt chieftan like mueller doing whatever he wants whenever he wants, answerable to no one, or do you want the normal process that worked for 200 years to take place and have that prosecutor answer to attorney general jeff sessions? i would prefer the regular chain of command and trust in the attorney general than have another mueller mini me running around doing whatever he wants. we have a horrible track record historically with special counsels. horrible. and i don't want to go there again. david: we don't know whether mueller is looking into the hillary scandals whether it's uranium one or the fusion gps story. as far as we can tell he's not because the pe

reexamine the e-mail scandal because it appears as though there is some evidence that james comey and loretta lynch were protecting hillary clinton and deliberately perhaps -- she did engaged in intentional acts which violated the law. in engaging gross negligence in the mishandling of classified documents? >> how do you get to it. >> by special counsel. >> so we have a situation where we have a second special counsel investigating the first special counsel. >> to some extent that robert mueller covered it up. it sounds crazy. >> it's such a farce now. but it is also clear because of the conflicts that exist in the a pointment this first special counsel if we may refer to rob mueller the first special counsel. the justice department is so-con conflicted you cannot rely on the justice department to investigate the clinton foundation, the clinton e-mails and the cover up by these conflicted officials at the top of the justice department. >> sessions cannot ablebly perform his job because he has too many conflicts of interests. >> who the hell can? >> alex accost that. a fine lawyer. under the vacancy

one is we sent loretta lynch, general lynch, a letter related to sober homes. a predicament. the predicament is straightforward. if -- her answer, to be honest, to chairman goodlatte and the rest of us, was not satisfactory. we have given your staff a copy of it. essentially sober living homes are nothing but boarding houses. they are required to provide no care whatsoever to the alcoholic or recovering drug abuser because that has to be done somewhere else. they don't qualify as sober homes. and yet currently there is in the ninth circuit decision that cause cities to be unable to regulate them in a way that would prevent people from simply buying houses in a row in a very prestigious neighborhood and turning them into these, if you will, sober living homes, which are again boarding houses with 15 or more people. would you agree to work with us to try to find and appropriate way to align your enforcement of the americans with disability act, and your enforcement of the fair housing act with the necessity for cities to be able to, essentially, regulate how many people live in

. >> loretta lynch is the one who had to specially approve the russian agents coming into this countryshe didn't have a visa so she could have a meeting with don trump, jr. setting him up so they can say don trump, jr. is meeting with this russian agent so we the need wiretaps. this stinks to high heaven. when push comes to shove, we'll see it was rod rosenstein and bob mueller who got those records sealed about the full russian investigation. if those records were out there where they could be viewed, it would put hillary clinton i don't know how she'll look in stripes. but that's the kinds of thing we are look at once we get our hands on that case file. lou: as you take note, gps fusion meeting with the russian attorney both before and after a debrief afterwards with that meeting with donald trump, jr. it stinks to high heaven. we'll continue our -- our conversation with these gentlemen in just a moment. why we are not learning more about what happened with the dnc with the folks who put together the uranium one deal and put all of that money, $143 million to work at the clinton foun

. >> two days before she gets interviewed, bill clinton and loretta lynch meeting on the tarmac in phoenixteful for you. happy thanksgiving to you and your family. come back soon. >> thank you so much. happy thanksgiving to you and everybody else. >> we come back straight ahead, are you dreading discussing politics around the thanksgiving table tomorrow. i want time out on politics tomorrow. some of my fox colleagues they're going to offer some helpful hints and how to avoid it. >> welcome back. this is "the ingraham angle" special gratitude in the age of trump. for better and sometimes for worse. let's face it. talking politics at the thanksgiving table is practically as much of tradition as the turkey and pumpkin pie and gravy. it's giving many us serious heart burn. according to a new poll, 58% of americans stay they are positively dreading the prospect discussing politics. that's up five points from last year during the aftermath of the election. 31% say they're eager to do so tomorrow. that's a 12 point plunge from last year. joining us now to analyze two of my favorite people here at

. >> and loretta lynch threatened him with prosecution. >> and gagged him saying don't you dare talk. >> and why did jeff sessions wait so long to lift the gag order and why has jeff sessions been peddling the lie that in fact there is no correlation between the sale of uranium and the racketeering team. either he is ignorant of the law or gullible. >> that took the plea that they took quietly. >> -- the department of justice. he is manipulating jeff sessions and sessions has no clue. >> andnd this informant has six years of information on the russian effort to get our uranium. documents and videotapes something like 5,000 different records so he has lots to sing about and i hope he begins to sing soon. >> and i hope he gets to go public soon. >> and they promised us that the uranium would never leave this country. >> another lie. >> and it left the country and the amazing part of it is that they used the secure root. theyey did an amendment. a trucking company sent it to canada and at the same time obama was doing the uranium deal and sent the $115 billion in cash to iran said you ca

circumstances where everything from loretta lynch going on the tarmac meeting with bill clinton to theion gps dossier by the democratic party and potentially reimbursed by the fbi and the uranium one deal fox covered with great vigor and a circumstance where uranium assets in the united states being used and owned by the russians and hillary clinton silent, with all the smoke we there is fire in the attorney general out to use the authority he said he has because we should not apply different standards as secretary clinton than donald trump just because she lost the election. losing an election is not an immunity deal, you have to be accountable for crimes and other bad acts of the prior administration. jillian: a lot of people are frustrated with the lack of answers and i'm sure you are as well. how frustrating is it when you go up there trying to get these questions answered and for a lot of them -- >> the chairman of the house judiciary committee and 20 members of the judiciary committee have been calling for a special counsel because so many people at the fbi and department of just

they see loretta lynch meeting with bill clinton on the tarmac.y see jim comey going outside the chain of command and absolving hillary clinton. so there is a place, though, that this can get done and it's called congress and they've been doing a very good job for the legwork of investigations on this. the problem is, in fact, the f.b.i. and justice department will not submit to the oversight that under the constitution they're bound by and not turning over the documents and making things available. and by the way, it's a special counsel, mueller, getting in the waive that because they keep saying, we can't interfere with his investigation. >> that's where sessions and rod ros ros rosensteen can step in. prosecutions, okay, few people in jail, big deal. the country needs to know what happened. that's what i want to know. i want to know what happened. >> and that's not the job of prosecutors. they don't issue reports on what happened. they indict people. we need congress to tell us what happened. >> and what about the political fallout if there's a