why going to the loya jirga, and why on this issue of jurisdiction for dealing with u.s. soldiers who may commit crimes in afghanistan? >> he has been claiming for a while that he's going to convene a jirga. it's a controversial people. many people in afghanistan believe there's no need for a jirga to be convened for this. he may go ahead with it anyway. he's going to put it in front of the parliament as well, so this issue is not going to be just addressed by the jirga, but the afghan parliament, which is a good sign. why the jurisdiction issue? the jurisdiction issue, in my opinion, and from what i hear from kabul, is to a large extent resolved, but president karzai would like to put his stamp of legitimacy on this whole affair. and with the other two contentious issues having been resolved during secretary kerry's trip to kabul over the last 48 hours or so, one being the sovereignty issue and the other one being a definition of aggression towards afghanistan and what the u.s. might do to help the afghans, this remains the smallest item on the agenda. i think that presid

they expelled me from the loya jirga and not allow me to come back.y said if i apologize, i could come back. i never said apology. they must say an apology to all of the oppressed people of afghanistan, especially [indiscernible] ofmit crimes under the name women's rights, human rights, and democracy. move into the 12th anniversary of the war in afghanistan, what has happened to your country. first of all, what are you doing there today? you're no longer a member of parliament. >> i am there underground. i have close contact with quite what you mean, underground? >> we have bodyguards. it is not safe moving from one place to another place. 10, terrorist attack my house and 12 of my bodyguards were brutally injured. that is why i have to be underground. house.ave an office or for security reasons, not only me -- there are many other activists that are struggling but have to be underground. in regards to your question about consequences of the 12 years of occupation of u.s. and crimesnfortunately, war violations, looting of our resource and changing of

they will consider what president oprah to the loya jirga, about the conditions for approval of bilateral security agreement. they'll recommend back to him whether afghanistan should should go or not. now, and as with the outcome will be. my guess is after the outcomes have seemed improvement over the last several years across many of the measures of societal improvement whether its life expectancy or child mortality are proven economically, none of that could have happened without the role of the united states and isaf and the coalitions in providing support specifically over the long-term. my guess is the iphone's will look at this closely and what their options are. if they don't approve it, the united states will not be for us there. the president has been clear without jurisdictional protections of forces and the aftermath, he will not leave our forces in afghanistan. afghanistan's need to see this video. you need to ask yourselves the question, what are your options that united states elects not to late forces because i very strong suspicion is our coalition part nurse won't either,