, at one time lynsey graham was remembered for a number of completely wild anti-russian, russophobic his odious speech was the words he said during last year ’s visit to zelensky, when he said at a meeting with zelensky that american money is not wasted, because it is spent on killing russians... in any case, lincegrem was not far from such positions what is happening to him now , an amazing transformation is happening to him, firstly, he did not vote in the senate for the very defense law that involves the allocation of 61 billion dollars to ukraine, he focused on the fact that first of all... the american administration must deal with the situation at the border, that is, repeating exactly the same thoughts that donald trump voices. moreover, lince grem is already saying that if ukraine is given money, it should be given on credit, and these loans will be secured maybe, well, for example, ukrainian lands or minerals, ukraine has something to pay for military assistance, this, of course, is an absolute change of rhetoric, an absolute change of approaches, it does not suit the white

american money was not wasted because that... they are wasted on killing russians, after which lynsey grahamthat his words were edited, that the ukrainians did it, and so on, but the fact remains that lynsey graham, in any case, was not far from such positions , what is happening to him now , an amazing transformation is happening to him, firstly, he did not vote in the senate for that same defense law, which involves the allocation of 61 billion dollars to ukraine, he focused on... an absolute change in approaches, it is completely arranges the white house and she destroys it in general that idea that joe biden is still trying to grab hold of as solomenka. joe biden is trying to sell military aid to ukraine to his voters under the premise that all this money will remain within the united states. although this money is intended for ukraine, it will be spent here in the usa, in arizona, where it produces. ohio and texas, where artillery shells are fired. biden hoped that these words would help him gather a support group in the form of people like lincegram, but lincegram chose a side donald t

here myself of course, the eloquent figure is that of senator lynsey graham.graham was remembered for a number of completely wild anti-russian, russophobic statements. perhaps his most odious speech was the words he said during last year ’s visit to zelensky, when he said at a meeting with zelensky that american money was not being wasted, because it was being spent on killing russians, after which linsey graham himself began to say that his words were edited, that the ukrainians did it, and so on further, but the fact remains that lince graham was in any case not far from such positions, what is happening to him now, an amazing transformation is happening to him, firstly, he did not vote in the senate for... grab joe biden. joe biden , for whom, like solomenka, is still trying to sell military aid to ukraine, is trying to sell it to his voters under the premise that all this money will remain inside. u.s.a. although this money is intended for ukraine, it will be spent here in the united states. in arizona, where patriot missiles are produced, in alabama, wher

elections even in conditions of war, however, and this, this fact provoked only two statements: lynsey graham, senator and tinnie cox, president of para, this caused an appropriate reaction and put, well, the ukrainian authorities in front of the temptation to hold elections and win them, quickly, as in the soviet song: little blood with one blow, but... it didn't happen, because i think sociology said other things, and obviously sociology in favor of valery zaluzhnyi said other things, so... i want to go back to the other, i want to go back to basically talking about how it was possible b to communicate this issue. first of all, it was necessary to say that the legislation does not provide for presidential elections in wartime and to explain this, because the presidential election in wartime is actually the election of a new one. the supreme commander-in-chief, and to announce these elections is to put the country on the line at the risk of a huge number of candidates, who may be completely disposable in nature, register for the sole purpose of criticizing the sitting commander-in-chief, i.e

and this, this fact was provoked by only two statements: lynsey graham, the senator and tinney cox, thedent of par. it caused an appropriate reaction and put the ukrainian authorities in front of the temptation to hold elections and win them quickly, as in the soviet song, it bled with a single blow, but this did not happen, because i think that sociology said other things, and obviously sociology in favor of valery zaluzhnyi said other things, so i want to return to the other, i want... what to return to, in principle, to talk about how this issue could be communicated? first of all, it was necessary to say that the legislation does not provide for presidential elections in wartime, and to explain this, because presidential elections in wartime are in fact the election of a new supreme commander, and if these elections are announced. then it is to put the country at risk of the appearance of a huge number candidates, which may be completely disposable in nature, register for the sole purpose of criticizing the current commander-in-chief, i.e. the president. it's a simple enough scenari

according to the main enthusiast of support for kiev, senator lynsey graham, square has a sufficientor military supplies. if kiev does not have money, it will pay with natural resources. with the land, it seems that a similar operation has already been carried out, according to statistics published recently by corporations the united states, the netherlands, luxembourg and other countries took possession of millions of hectares of ukrainian black soil after zelensky pushed through a law on the free sale of farmland, while the weapons appetite of the country’s authorities is only growing. in the european union, square is still not expected. negotiations on ukraine's accession to the eu have been frozen in brussels, at least until the summer. the head stated this. european commission ursula fondern. summer, by the way, is not a very random period. in june , elections to the european parliament will be held, at which a sharp strengthening of the position of eurosceptics is expected. they can get up to third places. and a deputy of one of these parties, alternative for germany, harold we

interesting and even ironic that some republicans, in particular one of the leading republicans , lynsey graham, who was usually usually known for support, stable support of the country, now declares that the legislation on border security should be added to this package of assistance to partners, even though the previous bill, which actually... had border security measures and was and was directly a bill on a bipartisan border agreement, was actually blocked by the republicans, but nevertheless, now one of the references that are being heard about the need to add to this package of assistance to partners is, in particular, also border security. in general, today i was able to talk with senators, both from the republican and democratic parties, and all of them say that aid to partners should be approved, some of them, although ... some republicans say that aid to ukraine should be stopped, and others say that even if aid to partners should be continued, it is not known how this vote will end in the senate, what they say, even they do not know... how this vote will end and what amendments will b

ukrainian issue, they will most likely return to their past rhetoric, which was first voiced by lynsey graham in kyiv, he said, that there is something wrong with our democracy, because there were no elections a long time ago, and then mike johnson, at the end of last year, he said that... he also drew attention to the problems with democracy, talked about corruption, and that the ban on churches in ukraine also prevents him from giving his vote in order to help ukraine. we are actually in such a rather difficult situation in the sense that each party will insist on its version of the corresponding vision of the document, and the consequences may actually be for their election campaigns, so whether one or the other camp will be ready to concede and essentially recognize s... his defeat at the start of the race in a sensitive issue, which has already been pumped up in the media, unfortunately, well, we will see, but there are still high hopes for the fact that, both among republican voters and among democratic voters, the majority is still in favor of ukraine, they wish us victory, and that is

29 senators, most of the republican senators, and of course there were such frostbitten scum as lynsey grahamough i’m sure that something similar could be being prepared, but in the end, well, i didn’t go, i didn’t go, the second is september 11, 2021, 2001, but tell us that this is possible, someone on september 10, september 10, 2001, someone would believe in it, someone would believe that he would be shot down, someone could believe it, that is, they can do the most terrible things, they killed their own president, i mean the americans, and they killed their own president more than once, kennedy was not the first, and so some someone else's president, even some allied country, but that's all little things, the same with congressmen, they are congressmen on... strikes by russian aviation, i see a week ago 66 strikes by russian aviation on ukrainian armed forces facilities, what does this mean: intensification, the same on multiple launch rocket systems, the same on artillery and the same for offensive actions , and absolutely in all directions, it means there is still an offensive, it means