i signed with him, macron, we -- macron and merkel, we signed a cease-fire. a cease-fire. all of them told me he will never go. we signed with him a gas contract. yes, but after that, he broke the cease-fire. he killed our people. he did not exchange prisoners. we signed the exchange of prisoners. but he didn't do it. what kind of diplomacy are you speaking about? what do you mean? vice pres. vance: i'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that will end the destruction of your country. mr. president, with respect, i think it is disrespectful for you to come into the oval office and try to litigate this in front of the american media. right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because your -- because you have manpower problems. you should be thanking the president for bringing an end to this conflict. pres. zelenskyy: you say what problems we have? vice pres. vance: i have actually watched and seen the stories and i know what happens is you bring people on a propaganda tour, mr. president. do you disagree you have had problems bringing peo

he has good relationships with president zelensky, president macron, the same, prime minister melonim italy, the same. so now we need support of these friends who will try to establish communication, maybe through them, maybe with their support between ukrainian and american president. we need this communication once again. it's too serious here. we are dying here every day. you've had very warm words from the european leaders, haven't you, since this exchange yesterday in the white house? but the question is, i suppose, what more can will you realistically expect them to do that they haven't already done? exactly. there are very warm words, and i want to thank all european leaders for all support. but the problem is you can't intercept russian missile with the statement by some european prime minister. in front of the cameras. when trump accused zelensky of being a dictator with only 4% support and so on. so it's not as if there was all sweetness and light before. this has always been a bit of a stormy relationship. well, yeah. and as stormy as it has been. was a deal that trump was

i signed with him, macron and merkel, we signed cease-fire. cease-fire. all of them told me that he will never go. we signed him with guest contracts -- guest contracts, yes, but after that, he broken the cease-fire. he killed our people. and he didn't exchange prisoners. we signed the exchange of prisoners. but he didn't do it. what kind of diplomacy, j.d., you speak about? what do you mean? >> i'm talk about the kind of diplomacy that's going tend destruction of your country. mr. president -- mr. president, with respect, i think it's disrespectful to try to litigate this in front of the u.s. media. you're forcing con scripts to the front line because you have man power problems you should be thanking the president for trying to brick into this conflict -- >> you say what problems we have? vice president vance: i've watched and seen the stories. and i know what happens is you bring people -- you bring them on a propaganda tour, mr. president -- do you disagree that you have problems bringing people into your military? and do you think it's respectful to

you saw what happened with macron, kier starmer.a. >> trace: chanley painter. >> i agree. i think the american people appreciate the transparency of the trump administration and maybe the white house could make available official oval office boxing gloves since so many jabs were landed today. >> trace: something. christina. >> i think it was great for the american people and world leaders, everyone to see their dynamic. it was so good to see the president be firm. he's always firm but it was much better than hearing biden say don't. >> trace: put it out there and let us decide. >> i love it and i think everybody who watched it loves it. there's no secret sauce, these are human beings that are negotiating. this was a negotiation. i think it should happen at every one of these meetings, win, lose or draw. >> trace: glenn says it had to be public or trump would have been blamed for the failure. christopher, all such meetings should be public. tammy says they should have been private, sometimes we just don't need to see how the sausage

i signed with him, macron and merkel. we signed cease-fire. all of them told me that he will never go. we signed him. just contract. yes. after that, he broke the cease-fire. he killed our people and he didn't exchange prisoners. we signed the exchange of prisoners but he didn't do it. what kind of diplomacy you are speaking about? what do you mean? >> i'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country. with respect i think it's disrespectful for you to come into the oval office and try to litigate this in front of the american media. you are forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. >> have you ever been to ukraine that you say what problems we have? >> i have actually watched and seeking the stories and i know what happens is you bring people on a propaganda tour. do you disagree that you have had problems bringing people into your military? and do you think it's respectful to come to the oval office of the united states of america and attacked the administration trying

trump got a visit from french president emmanuel macron today, and ooh la la. [ laughter ] watch thistime these guys get together, they have a long and uncomfortable handshake. and they kind of won't let go of each other. they shake hands the way dogs get stuck together when they're mating. [ laughter ] macron was in washington on the third anniversary of russia's invasion of ukraine to try to convince trump not to bend over all the way for his kgbff vlad putin. trump last week blamed ukraine for the war with russia. which is, i mean, these ukrainians invaded themselves! it's quite an argument. today, after last week calling zelensky a dictator, he refused to call putin a dictator when asked. i get the idea that when trump watches "lord of the rings," he's rooting for gollum. there is something off there. speaking of gollum, rudy giuliani -- [ laughter ] [ applause ] had a rough moment at a walmart this weekend. he was at a walmart in secaucus, new jersey, and he was spotted shopping for hair dye. there he is, checking out the new colors. you know, there's sad and there's "shopping fo

french president emmanuel macron and the president of the european parliament.eantime republican senator lindsey graham rushed to president trump's defense. graham called the meeting an utter disaster and said zelenskyy needs to change his stance or resign. >> his take was a teaching moment, interesting take on all of this. obviously the conversation will continue, devin. coming up at 6:30 on the cbs evening news, we'll dive deep into the fallout from the explosive meeting, what this could mean for the future of military aid to ukraine. >>> california's so-called daylighting law went into effect the first of the year, but some cities are scaling back or saying they cannot enforce it right now. in san francisco the sfmta pulled back its initial enforcement plan and that decision is leaving some people feeling vulnerable. >> reporter: living with a disability, michael smith spends a lot of time at home. when he gets out, he has to use public transit. getting there requires a walk which routinely reveals how vulnerable he is as a pedestrian. >> if i'm in the crossw

mientras el presidente de francia, emmanuel macron, reiterÓ que rusia es el paÍs agresor. narcotraficante rafael caro quintero bajÓ de un aviÓn desde mÉxico, llegÓ al paÍs esposado con traje de presidiario. responderÁ asÍ ante la justicia por el secuestro, la tortura y el asesinato del agente de la dea, enrique kiki camarena, en 1985. hoy caro quintero se presentÓ en una corte de nueva york y se declarÓ no culpable. tambiÉn se presentÓ en corte vicente carrillo fuentes, otro de los trasladados desde mÉxico ayer junto a su hermano, conocido como el seÑor de los cielos, dirigiÓ el cÁrtel de juÁrez. estados unidos ha dicho busca la pena de muerte para ellos dos. aunque el acuerdo entre los dos paÍses impide la pena de muerte para los criminales mexicanos extraditados, karla amezola reporta. >> la justicia nunca olvidan dÍa histÓrico que esperaban hace 40 aÑos. con esas frases la fiscalÍa presentÓ ante un juez en nueva york al llamado narco de narcos, rafael caro quintero, presunto lÍder fundador del cÁrtel de guadalajara y quien es seÑalado como el responsable de la tortura y

and i think they were concerned about trump's weakness or softness with macron and starmer. that's why jd vance was there. i think jd vance came in to create this crisis and up to his interference, it was all more. again, trump. trump was trump. but but jd vance intentionally provoked the crisis. and then it was very easy. trump fired up. >> well, he got fired. >> because he was lying. i mean, he was pushing the same lies. you know, he was a straight face the same way he did it in munich, facing the europeans, saying, you're a bunch of suckers and losers. the same. he's you know, he knows how to deliver. and he knew exactly that. trump will jump. you know, when zelenskyy tried to actually to correct the facts. >> you know, on that moment when you see you see zelenskyy laying out the times the ceasefire has been broken and trump's annoyed at times, he jumps in and tries to make the point. well, i wasn't president then, but it is jd vance. i think it's disrespectful for you to come to the oval and then he and the whole thing turns, you know, sort of jumped in to come to the de

we then have macron from france. >> and keir starmer. >> from britain, bringing what i call bringing fruits to the volcano. essentially. essentially trying to pacify this sort of irrational force of nature. and they get they get a little bit, you know, when you when you abase yourself to trump for quite rational reasons. >> i'm not. >> criticizing macron or. >> starmer for. >> trying that. >> method first. but when you. >> base yourself to trump, you get a little bit of a reprieve. >> this was. >> an extremely short reprieve because the day after starmer left, we see, i think, the most infamous episode in modern us diplomatic history, the berating of the victim and that his presentation as the culprit, zelensky as the culprit. an extraordinary spectacle that trump allowed. >> to run. >> on and on and on. he wanted it. >> and he said. and he. >> said, there's a. >> reason i let this. >> drag on. >> yes. >> i wanted the american. people to see this. >> and it wasn't just because it was going to be. >> good tv. now, bear with me here. >> i don't think it's. >> an accident that we have s

macron and merkel. we signed cease-fire. he broken the ceasefire. he killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners. we signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn't do it. what kind of diplomacy? g-d, you are speaking about? what what what do you what do you mean? >> i'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country. >> yes, but if you. >> are not president, with respect, i think it's disrespectful for you to come into the oval office and try to litigate this in front of the american media. at first, president trump said very little during that exchange, but that soon changed. >> the war. during the war, everybody has problems, even you, but you have nice ocean and don't feel now, but you will feel it in the future. >> god bless you. >> god bless you. god bless you. >> don't tell us what we're going to feel. we're trying to solve a problem. don't tell us what we're going to feel. >> i'm not telling you. >> because you're in no position to dictate that. remember that you're in no position to dictate w

and this is what president emmanuel macron said after that drama, pointing out that this was not started ukraine. >> we all know the situation. there is an aggressor and that is russia. there are people attacked who are from ukraine. we were all right to help ukraine and sanction russia three years ago, and to continue to do so. and when i say we, i'm talking about the united states of america, the europeans, the canadians, the japanese and many others. and that's it. therefore, we must thank everyone who has helped, and we must help those who from the beginning have been fighting because they fight for their dignity, for their independence, for their children, and for the security of europe. these are important things that we must remember in these moments. >> that is the sentiment across the region. the leaders of the european union commission, council and parliament sent out a joint statement telling president zelenskyy he is not alone. they said that your dignity honors the bravery of the ukrainian people. be brave, be strong, be fearless. kim. >> looking forward now, there's a meeti

macron and merkel. we signed a ceasefire. yes, but after that, he broken the ceasefire. he killed our people and he didn't exchange prisoners. we signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn't do it. what kind of diplomacy jd you are speaking about? what what what do you mean? >> i'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country. >> yes. >> mr. president. mr. president, with respect, i think it's disrespectful for you to come into the oval office and try to litigate this in front of the american media right now. you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. you should be thanking the president. >> so that was it about thanking them. and zelenskyy was called out for laying out all of those times that putin has broken the ceasefire. and then trump said this. >> you're gambling with world war iii and what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country. this country that's backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have. >> have you said thank you once this

you know, listen, i talked to french president macron earlier in the week. he said he's trying to get europe to do more, including france. they're at just over 2% as far as defense spending and nato. i talked to the uk prime minister. they want to do more. said they'll do peacekeepers there at about 2.5%. you know, these are numbers where they they're they're low as far as what they're contributing individually, not only to nato but into ukraine comparatively now as europe, they've they've put in about $140 billion. that said, it's not enough if the us steps aside, if the weapons stop, if the us stops its support, you're right. europe probably can't do it alone. despite their encouraging words that they tweeted out today. and that's why today was so detrimental to the entire picture. the all of the leaders macron, sturmer, zelensky even acknowledged that this would not happen without president trump. he is the only person with this catalyst to change the paradigm that maybe, maybe there could be peace. and that's why it was so screwed up. what happened in th

by president macron and. >> and. >> and others just this week. so trump has been lying, as he so frequently does from the. oval office. and many of us have had to fact check him in the past. i had an. >> experience to do. >> that myself. >> and he. >> does not like. >> that. >> the minerals deal. maybe. maybe, i don't know. i was just a comms person. okay, but i thought that the minerals deal that wasn't a minerals person. i don't fancy myself as an economist like the chairman here. i was just a commerce person and my comms person understanding of what is going on here, that the minerals deal was literally ukraine and the united states basically signing an mou so that american companies can mine these minerals in their country. i would know where the minerals are. i'm told. >> some of. >> them are. some of them are in territories currently controlled by russia. it does nothing for ukraine. so it feels to me like a like a little bit of an extortion. but you tell me. >> well, so. >> i think where it went off. >> the rails was. the trump. administra

. >> wasn't a fan of macron. >> and then.acron came with the whatever and now he. >> likes him again. >> so i. >> think. >> there's two. >> things for now. let's watch this moment. >> from earlier. >> i don't wear a suit. >> you're the highest level in this country's office and you. >> refuse to wear a suit. just want to see if you do. >> own a suit. >> yeah, yeah. problems. >> i a lot of americans have problems with. >> you not. >> respecting the dignity. >> of this office. >> i will wear costume after this war. will finish. >> this is a wartime president. much like winston churchill, who came to the white house during a war. did not come in a suit. two days ago, elon musk and a cabinet meeting wearing a baseball hat and a black t shirt and a jacket. that same reporter, i didn't i didn't catch him asking elon musk, why are you disrespecting our white house? what's the point of that? >> i want to make one language point. >> the word costume is suit in russian. so when he says i'm not wearing a costume, he's. not mocking the t

european leaders chimed in in support of zelenskyy after this exchange, like french president emmanuel macron, who emphasized that ukraine is the victim. the ukrainians we spoke with say they're encouraged to see that support and worried about what will come next from russia. i don't see how it makes sense for the us to abandon ukraine. that could lead to some pretty catastrophic consequences if russia is not stopped. now the consequences could be very sad and unpredictable. alyssa goard, nbc bay area news. okay, let's switch gears for a moment. a live look out at san francisco. we are tracking rain coming in for the forecast this weekend. let's get straight to chief meteorologist jeff ranieri to tell us when it's going to get here and how much it's going to be. well, we do expect that rain to start getting here as we head through tomorrow's forecast. and this is going to be quite the turn after all that warm weather we had today. up as high as 80 in stanford, danville at 79, current storm ranger scan and the other radar showing a little bit of green. we're seeing some drizzle develop, but th

minister of the united kingdom, ready to put boots on the ground, the president of france, emmanuel macrondy to put boots on the ground, the nato secretary-general, about broader security guarantees, this could have been and should have been a positive moment for ukraine. then we go to further negotiating with the russians, bring this war to a end, move the world forward and stop the death and destruction, what became clear and what has the president so frustrated and angry is that it is not clear that zelenskyy truly wants to stop the fighting. he came and even though he was warned not to determine to litigate all that in front of the entire world and the vice president said enough is enough, the president said enough is enough and i got to tell you this was the wrong approach, wrong time in history and the wrong president to try to do this kind of thing, this is not joe biden, this is donald trump in the entire world saw that crystal clear. peter:when you explained to zelenskyy he was leaving the white house without lunch are that important signing did he look surprised? did he seem to r

. >> president macron with a small group of senators led. >> by senator thune. >> and what i kept thinking. >> is to a t. >> the republican. >> senators that have met with these foreign. leaders have been very. >> clear that they. >> are supportive. >> of ukraine. >> at. >> least ones that go to the meeting. >> and. >> that they. >> believe that. >> vladimir putin is. >> the. dictator and that he started. >> this war. >> so we. >> start with that. >> so i thought that. >> president zelensky, this. >> couldn't have gone better. >> this morning. he was actually looking forward. >> to going over to the white house. >> he was in good spirits. >> so when i watched that video, there is one aggressor. there is one. side showing. >> disrespect, and that is when j.d. vance berates. >> a president of a foreign. >> country that is. our ally. zelensky has. stood up to a dictator. >> he they have lost. >> hundreds of thousands of people. >> he did it with. three simple words. >> the first day of the. >> invasion. >> when he went down to the. >> street corner. >> when everyone. >> had counted him out an

but we saw when president macron was at the white house when with president trump, he corrected him when he said that europe was going to be repaid. we saw that the uk prime minister corrected the president when he said that europe was getting its money back. when vice president vance said that this is diplomacy and and president zelenskyy said rightfully we had a deal on a cease fire. he didn't keep it. we had a deal on exchange for prisoners. he didn't keep it. you say that was out of line, even considering the context of what we've seen this week from other european leaders who were allowed to correct the president when he was wrong. >> mhm. victor. >> what he. >> said was correct. but it's when you say. >> it. >> um, you say it in private. you don't embarrass or even attempt to embarrass. >> the president. >> or vice president like that. um, again, it he was just responding to it. the person who was wrong here was vice president vance. in my mind. however, president zelenskyy could rise above that and make his points in private. >> um, terrell, let me come to you one last thing. you

and by the way, through the week, we had meetings with president macron with a small group of senators led by senator thune. and what i kept thinking is to a. t. the republican senators that have met with these foreign leaders have been very clear that they are supportive of ukraine, at least the ones that go to the meeting and that they believe that vladimir putin is the dictator and that he. started this war. so we start with that. so i thought that president. >> zelensky, this. >> couldn't have gone better this morning. he was actually looking forward to going over to the white house. he was in. >> good spirits. >> so when i watched that video, there is one aggressor. there is one side showing disrespect, and that is when j.d. vance berates a president of a foreign country that is our ally. >> zelensky has. stood up to. >> a dictator. he they have lost hundreds of. thousands of people. he did it with three simple words. the first day of the invasion, when he went down to the street corner, when everyone had counted him out and said three words we are here. and that has never changed

macron has set the table. duda of poland has already met with with president trump. is there any strategy that's clear that could bring president trump back onside into the coalition with with europe to offer these security guarantees? they're hoping for? >> they weren't. >> getting those. security guarantees before the blow up. so, i mean, it's been consistently trump saying that the europeans have to do a lot more now. i think it is conceivable that if the europeans are able to put a lot more money on the table for the ukrainians, if they're able and willing to send a lot of troops on the ground in the event of an agreed to ceasefire, it's always possible that trump can say, look, uh, biden couldn't get that done. i'm i'm the one that got european leadership done, and now i'm prepared, um, to get back in the room with my european allies. but that is not close to where we are right now. trump has shown much greater interest in getting a deal with putin, who, according to trump, has the cards that zelenskyy does not have. and and engaging in that deal over the heads

yeah, he was on the phone with macron and some other folks, and he showed up at fox news. he pulled right up here outside. i was trying to pull out. i was like, oh, recording it like a tourist. i said, is this the he had a fire truck. let me tell you, president zelensky had a fire truck with him and an ambulance. they were ready. he pulls up, he comes upstairs and brett baer, and this is what he had to say about his soldiers. >> i think that's very important to understand what's going on. but i. i respect my soldiers and our people, our civilians who work and support our warriors. i can't say just stop. nobody will stop because everybody afraid that putin will come back tomorrow. we want a just and lasting peace. it's true. we want security guarantees. >> these people know the enemy they're dealing with. they have history here. they were once part of the soviet satellite system. they understand how this. so if the people on the ground who are living through this war are saying, don't cut a deal with this guy because he's not going to honor it, they know. so listening to do

but i also think when you're looking at all the world leaders that have come through from macron to netanyahu to starmer, there's always been a way that they've approached you. you're deferential. you don't challenge. zelenskyy showed up wearing what he wanted to wear. he showed up challenging toe to toe trump. that's not a style they're used to in the oval office, let alone with donald trump. what's happened after this? abbey tonight in real time, yesterday or tomorrow? there are supposed to be a lot of leaders from around europe gathering together in london to talk about once there was some sort of a peace deal in with ukraine. how do we counter and support? do we send troops from our country? how do we help fund ukraine and the global security pact in europe? i am hearing from one source that there are more leaders showing up to this meeting than were actually expected to show up. people have watched this. they really understand it and they've taken note. >> there was one european official who said it. now it's time for a new leader of the free world. but my question to you is what's wrong

prime minister, keir starmer, has called for this summit of european leaders tomorrow, of course, macron will be there. president of france, zelenskyy will be there as well. they've already made the pilgrimage to the u.s. they've come to the white house. starmer brought the letter from the king calling for another state visit. i mean, they've done all of the diplomacy. what can they accomplish? what can they do now to try to get or keep the president, president trump on side? >> that's a very good question. i think that the british government is trying to do their best both to do what works best with trump, with open flattery, for example, while at the same time trying to maintain their principled support of ukraine. i think they will try to bring the united states back in. they will try to revive the minerals deal, because that is the one thing that is the greatest incentive for the united states to become involved and remain involved. whether they can do so remains to be seen, but that is our hope that they can bring the u.s. and ukraine back together. >> and if they they get them on s

um, it'll be led by macron and starmer. france and britain. look for the poles to play an important role here. look for the baltics, who are small countries but mighty in their fear and detesting russia. look for the swedes, the swedes and the finns who have long bad history with russia. i think there's plenty of will to go with that capacity. i think the euros are going to step up here. >> okay. if if the united states collapses its support for ukraine, if it greatly diminishes what its heretofore been doing for ukraine, and if the europeans don't fill the void, for how much longer can ukraine hold out on the battlefield against russia? how long can they go it alone? >> they can't go it alone for any reasonable amount of time. but assuming the europeans even continue their current level of aid. and let's do the numbers for a minute here. um, the u.s. thus far in three years has provided about 120 billion. call it 40 billion a year. the europeans have provided in total all forms of aid. well, well, more than that. 160 to 180 billion. so there

and that is why president macron of france, the prime minister of great britain, have made the pointsweek in washington that we need to have a tight security plan with any agreement that's made. and that means troops from both great britain and france have offered up troops. once there is an agreement to work with the ukrainians to enforce it. so all president zelenskyy was saying is that we need to make sure that the agreement is firm, or vladimir putin, as he has in the past, will violate it. >> yeah, and that was the question that i had for for president trump before this imploded today, which was about those security guarantees. that's been the key question these leaders have had. but the question is how do they get back to those those talks? for trump, diplomacy is personal. he takes these things incredibly personal. not that any president really doesn't. but i mean, do you see this getting back to a path where they are, where ukraine still has real leverage at the negotiating table. >> for the sake of united states leadership? we must. and so i would start with the mineral agree

and do you think trump likes macron? no he doesn't. d0 trump likes macron? no he doesn't.is an amazing situation. shouting match in the oval office. >> raging trump raging trump. >> raging trump raging trump. >> humiliates zelenskyy on live tv. i don�*t know how they decide. >> whether zelenskyy. >> whether zelenskyy. >> has one eye, one. >> has one eye, one. >> y or. two ys. >> y or. two ys. >> it doesn't matter. it's just >> it doesn't matter. it�*s just the spelling. >> it�*s just the spelling. >> it�*s just the spelling. >> s0 >> it�*s just the spelling. >> so they he was basically i think donald trump. >> wanted to hear him say. >> wanted to hear him say. >> zelenskyy, say, listen, thank. >> you for giving. >> you for giving. >> us $350 billion. >> us $350 billion. >> well. >> well. >> this is the thing. i mean, trump bandies this figure around $350 billion. but essentially, essentially america has has given ukraine a bunch of decommissioned military equipment and then said, that's worth, you know, x number of billion dollars. but, i mean, i could give you my old niss

and, i mean, i thought, did you not suspect that something was happening in a way when he hosted macronide chat in front of the world's press and, you know, it could have gone delicately, even with macron. and then, you know, to watch starmer suddenly pull out the envelope. >> that was. >> that was. >> a golden envelope. >> a golden envelope. >> stroke of genius that i thought was do clunky. >> i thought. >> i thought. >> it was no. >> it was no. >> it was no. >> i thought it was pretty good. you might you might as well. trump likes talking about playing cards doesn't doesn't he? >> and starmer. >> and starmer. >> starmer had a card so why not play it early. >> he looked he looked clunky in the sense that, you know he's not got a great personality i don't think. keir starmer he's don�*t think. keir starmer he's never going to appear well in that situation. but just the act of pulling out that he knew that trump trump was gonna be impressed by it. i think it worked. and you compare it to what happened yesterday and it's chalk and cheese. >> what's your hairiest negotiation. >> for you? >

president in 2019, i signed with him the deal i signed with him, him the deal i signed with him, macron all of ceasefire, ceasefire. all of them told me that he will never go. we signed him gas contract. go. we signed him. gas contract. gas contract. yes. but after that, he broken the ceasefire. he killed our people and he he killed our people and he didn't exchange prisoners. we signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn't do it. what kind of diplomacy? jd you are speaking about? what do you. what do you. what do you mean? >> i�*m talking about the kind of >> i'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to end the destruction of your country. >> yes, but if you, mr president. >> mr president, with respect, i think it's disrespectful for you think it�*s disrespectful for you to come into the oval office and try to litigate this in front of the american media. right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. you should be thanking the president for. >> who you. >> who you. >> bring into this. >> bring into this.