and yet the estimated cost for the program, which would be the line, as i understand it, to connect madeira to bakersfield, cost from $33 million when it was put before the voters in california in 2007 to at least $100 million in 2012. so therefore the cost of building it have tripled three times of what it was estimated when this issue was put to the voters of california. and i would just point out that there's serious questions that have been raised by california by independent individuals who have looked at it, including the state auditor who said the california bullet train project has become increasingly risky because of fiscal issues with it, even the first phase they are concerned about it. and with respect to california, the california high-speed rail peer review group, an expert body mandated by state law, not a federal group expressed serious doubts about it and concluded it could not at this time recommend that the california legislature approve appropriation for the bonds of it because the project, quote, represents an immense financial risk. why would we designate additional fe