suggested to patrick that uh by some people on social media that his experience working with madeline albright actually is what radicalized him, radicalized him into you know these sort of appalling racist views, i don't whether you would agree with that, no, it doesn't surprise me at all, madeline albright held some very uh racist views against lots of people, including serbs, she's been caught on camera uh showing those views, perhaps uh, this is just a tip of the iceberg if you will, that's the secretary of state. the top diplomat in the us at the time, so it's pretty shocking. yeah, no, but david, do you think there's a more general problem in the foreign policy establishment um of zinist infiltration? absolutely, i mean, this is a question, yes, it's a question of of us imperial interests, as as some people would say, that that's you, an important part of the the analysis, but we've got also got to understand that designers have spent a long, long time trying to infiltrate the foreign policy establishment in the us, and indeed other countries. too, and so you if you look at the, i mean wh

the thing to me that was most pertinent in this is to see that he was a uh head staffer from madeline albright of all people, the former us secretary of state, who showed no remorse in her part in the genicide of iraqi children uh during the 1990s and beyond, she said that was a price worth paying for some reason to uh rid the world of the regime in baghdad, so she had no remorse, but that just shows you the general ad that's pervasive, we don't see this, but among the staff of people in washington and for instance people support israel and zionists within the us government structure, these are the... pervasive attitudes, they're absolutely caustic, these are people that uh are very much low empathy individuals um who have no, no problem at all espousing their views in private, it's only this time they were caught on camera because he thought he was talking to nobody uh you a pholawful vendor or what have you uh in in new york city and i think it's telling there's other people hold the same views as shell do it, some of them are very vocal about it on ex twitter and facebook and other. platfor

it suggested to patrick that by some people on social media that his experience working with madeline albright actually is what radicalized him, radicalized him into you know these sort of appalling racist views, i don't whether you would agree with that. no, it doesn't surprise me at all, madeline albriight held some very uh racist views against lots of people, including serbs, she's been caught on camera uh showing those views, perhaps uh, this is just a tip of the iceberg if you will, that's the secretary of state, the top diplomat in the us at the top. so it's pretty shocking, yeah, do you think there's a more general problem in the foreign policy establishment of zint infiltration? absolutely, i mean, this is a question, yes, it's a question of of us imperial interests, as as some people would say, that that's you, an important part of the the analysis, but we've got also got to understand that designers have spent a long, long time trying to infiltrate the foreign policy establishment in the us and indeed other countries too, and so you if you look at the, i mean, people say about why wh

in power, a mass murderer, a gross, a violator of international human rights laws, etc, etc. madeline albright, when asked about iraqi children, you know, she said it was something worth the, you know, but they accepted. i mean, but my point is, you can, you can say a lot of things about henry kissinger, but, you know, a, he didn't take the job because he was a st. okay. he was a, a very talented and geopolitical thinker. now we can disagree with some of the things that he did, but to put him in mass murder category like that without and being standing alone. come on, go ahead, mark us. yeah, i think i think it was quite hold on the other to keep necessary. did the growling so good? i mean, i can't think of any states from them since the end of the 2nd level. that still helps the importance on the credos on the, on the, on the gravitas that he had. i'm used to visiting all sorts of the world leaders. you know that in the last time it's in martin. he worked very hard at it. okay. i mean, it is what it, it was interesting things that he called debated the, the midst of about himself. no, but bet

you know the, you know, madeline albright, in 1996 the half a 1000000 children dying and iraq was an acceptable casualty in order to make sure that our interest were served and united states that was long before the, you know, 911. and so they, are they talking rhetoric, there's people that are sitting behind a curtain that are making decisions for the american people that do not serve any nation. and they don't respect the sovereignty of those nations. so i don't think that there is a number, i don't think you can actually satisfy the blood verse of the american machine. and it's of the institutional right that we have going on in our country and look, i'm not, i'm not anti america. i am proud to be an american, but my enemy is not rushing. my enemy is not a rack landing me is not afghanistan, nor is it the palestinian people. but you have an apparatus of our government that literally says it's more complicated than is and a says firewood stop, people from dine. and that's ultimately what we should use as a, as a measuring stick for humanity. but not washington. it has to be now spo

in power, a mass murderer, a gross, a violator of international human rights laws, etc, etc. madeline albright, when asked about iraqi children, you know, she said it was something worth the, you know, but they accepted. i mean, but my point is, you can, you can say a lot of things about henry kissinger, but, you know, a, he didn't take the job because he was a st. okay. he was a, a very talented and geopolitical thinker. now we can disagree with some of the things that he did, but to put him in mass murder category like that without and being standing alone. come on. go ahead, mark. yeah, i think i think joe was quite hold on him. i don't think he necessary it. did the growling so good? i mean, i can't think of any states from them is since the end of the 2nd level that still held the importance on the credos on the, on the under gravitas that he had. i'm used to visiting all sorts of the world leaders. you know that in the last time it's in martin. he worked very hard at it. okay. i mean, it is. what does it was interesting things that he called debated the the midst of about himself. no, bu

madeline al-brit. does that -- madeleine albright, does that name ring a bell? the list goes on and on and on. the hard, undeniable reality is this -- our nation's prosperity, power, and greatness are inextricably intertwined with our identity of a nation of striving, hardworkingism grants. no wonder our systems have received overwhelming support over the decades. they're an essential source of our strength. let's be perfectly clear about something else -- welcoming asylum seekers, paroleeses and refugees is far from just an act of compassion. these systems directly support our national security and strategic economic interests at home and abroad. imagine a world where the united states and other countries did not have systems to provide refugee to dissidents, journalists, lawyers, and others taking on tyrants and defending liberties in their countries. would they have the same level of courage to enact change in their country if they did not think they could protect themselves and their families if they gamed liv-and-death persecution? to my republican friends, i say this, it's time to free y