manalo, jonathan saying the same thing.ked like he got his butt beat and staggering to the ground. we caught up spd ayala the hands under the body. if that is a concern of yours that my client dared to testify in a statement that tee his hands out out of fear for a weapon and that that is contraindicated because trayvon martin's hands, look at the picture, by the way. one hand is not under but the other hand seems to be that that is in inconsistency for which you should impute ill will or hatred or spite, that is absurd. and dr. di maio said it was. 10 to 15 seconds of talking of movement or whatever. not only is it possible, it's probable. stacy livingston, the emt who was there and you heard about the injuries and what she did. tij thi timothy smith is important. he was the one george zimmerman talked to twice before screaming for help before he knew there was any 911 call suggesting it. lindsey fulgate she was the first one to mention mma style. you know about this witness. can't help you. don't do it. don't even try. fo

manalo took that photograph. why is the blood still on there and why would the blood not be on the victim's hands? it's interesting too the direction of the blood. and we'll talk a little bit about that. in terms of what happened. state's exhibit 77. mr. manalo before the police got out there. where the victim's hands? under his body. what did the defendant claim to you? he used police jargon in terms of suspect and, well, the police, of course, they always spread out the arms and hands to make sure there's no weapon there. because he's trying to tell the police that what happens is he was scared and he at wasn't point said, i thought he had something in his hands, i was checking for that weapon, that's what i was doing. well, that's inconsistent with the physical evidence out there. now, defense may argue, hold on, didn't dr. demayo says the person can kind of walk and do all this other stuff for 15 seconds. so then the defendant kind of moves him and spreads out his hands and taking more blood pumping out and t

the manalos, mr. and mrs. manalo talked to you about what they observed. what they really didn't observe. my recollection is ms. manalo said the bigger person was on top. they made a big issue the defense in cross examining her, hold on. you did see photographs on tv. photographs of trayvon martin showed him playing football, in a football uniform. yeah, that's true. but i still think the person on top was the bigger person. now, she didn't see the shooting. my point is that there was a fight there. there was a struggle. at some points, it appears, based on the evidence, that the defendant was on top. and at some points the victim was on top. wrestling, struggling, whatever you want to call it. but why did it occur? why did it occur? if you believe he's an innocent man, then you believe that the victim just decided to come up and just smack him. smack the defendant. the defendant fell to the ground. the victim just started beating him up for -- oh, we don't know. but for some reason. and that the defendant really wasn't following him. the defendant really

manalo, please call my wife, and then apparently mr.s taking too long or something and he said just tell her i killed him, just matter of fact. those acts, those actions speak volumes of what occurred that evening, sunday evening and they speak volumes of this defendant's actions. sunday february 27th, sorry, february 26th, 2012, at 7:09 p.m., at the retreat at twin lakes town homes, now, are you obviously aware that the shooting actually happened minutes later. i think because of the recording that was made we were actually able to precisely determine when that fatal shot occurred. it occurred at 7:16 and 55 seconds. i would submit that the events leading up to this murder actually occurred not just earlier that sunday evening, but months before. why do i say that? even though trayvon martin wasn't there months before, why do i say that the events leading up to this occurred months before? you recall the testimony of several people, but most importantly, the evidence you heard from this defendant's mouth when he was being interviewed b

manalo took that photograph. why was the blood still on there and why would the blood not be on the victim's hands? interesting, too, the direction of the blood. we'll talk a little bit about that. in terms of what happened. state's exhibit 77, mr. manalo, before the police got out there. where are the victim's hands? but under his body? what did the defendant claim to you? he used police jargon in terms of suspect and the police, of course, they always spread out the arms, hands, to make sure there's no weapon there. he's trying to tell police what happened is he was squared at one point i thought he had something in his hands and i was checking for that weapon. that's what i was doing. seems consistent with the physical evidence out there. the defense may argue, hold on, didn't dr. di maio say you could take out a person's heart and could live for 15 seconds and the person could walk and do all this stuff? you take out his heart and the moves them and spreads out his hand and taking more blood pumping out. the

manalo, please call my wife.too long or something, and he said just tell her i killed him. just kind of matter of fact. those acts -- those actions speak volumes of what occurred that evening, sunday evening, and they speak volumes of this defendant's actions. sunday, february 27th -- sorry. february 26, 2012, at 7:09 p.m., at the retreat at twin lakes town homes. now you're obviously aware that the shooting actually happened minutes later. in fact, i think because of the recording that was made we were actually able to precisely determine when that fatal shot occurred and it occurred at 7 6 7:16:55. but i would submit that the events leading up to this murder actually occurred not just earlier that sunday evening, but months before and why do i say that even though trayvon martin wasn't there months before. why do i stha the events leading up to this occurred months before? you recall the testimony of several people, but most importantly the evidence you heard from this defendant's mouth when he was being interv

manalo showed up, i think it's consistent with the facts that trayvon martin brought his hands back in. even john guy suggested that trayvon martin was clutching his hands. it makes much more sense that it happened that trayvon martin clutched his hands back. >> it seems that the trial is moving fairly quickly. is the time line going faster than what you expected? >> a bit faster than i expected. i think the state may be done tomorrow or friday. that means we start friday or monday. we'll probably take most of next week, hard to say, maybe not. there are still some decisions that the court has to make about the add missability of evidence. he's very worried, he's very stressed. he's glad he finally has his day in court. this is very real to everyone, most importantly, george zimmerman, we have the state of florida trying to suggest that he killed trayvon martin of some ill-will and hatred. >> now, because of audio tapes talking to police, he's been able to give his version of the events without being cross-examined. you cannot see at this point putting george zimmerman on the stand, ca

manalo. again, lying about that. he is trying to justify to the police he was searching because, of course, the victim had to have something in his hand, mean something kind of weapon that would have caused him to resort to the shooting. [inaudible] >> like this and i shot him, and i didn't think i hit him. he said, you got me. you got it-got me, something like that. so i -- [inaudible] >> assumed he hadn't shot him but then he had to push him off him. does that make sense? i guess when he said -- kind of fell into him, when he had been shot. and again, this is just in written form, some of the stuff you have already heard. just to kind of remind you. you've also got -- i'm not going to play it for you but a clubhouse video. very short. there's clips of it. by coincidence it appears there's a vehicle you might see a person, not a full figure, but a car where the mail boxes are. by coincidence, what rachel jan jeantel told you where he was, under the shaded part. where he described the defendant looking at him. >> he

manalo and the officer.as undeniable injuries that evidence nothing other than a violent attack by trayvon martin. there's no other reasonable hypothesis that could come from that undisputed evidence other than my client was attacked by trayvon martin, some form or fashion. is it determined quite yet how and what precise moment? maybe not. i would suggest that there's absolutely no evidence to contraindicate what my client now has before you and before the jury, which is that he was at the t intersection when he was attack -- approached and then attacked by trayvon so there's no evidence to contraindicate that. and he was hit in the face. and there's no evidence to contraindicate that. and what it did to his nose. that violent act in and of itself i would suggest to you is sufficient for immediate response with great -- with deadly force. but he didn't. what we have is 40 seconds of somebody screaming. of course you know my client through his statements that it was him screaming. and receiving additional inj

manalo showed up is consistent with the fact and the medical examiner can talk about it, martin could have put his hands back in. trayvon martin was clutching his hands. why would george make something like that up in the second that he had to do it, unless it actually happened? makes much more sense that it happened, trayvon martin clutched his hands back. >> seems the trial is moving fairly quickly. is the timeline going faster than you expected or about what you expected it to be? >> a bit faster than i expected. i think the state may be done tomorrow or friday and that means we'll start friday or mean and we'll probably take most of next week,i it's hard to say, maybe not there are still decisions the court has to make about admissibility of evidence. if that's allowed, that could extend the testimony by a couple of three days. >> how does your client feel about the trial? can you say? >> he's very afraid. the state of florida trying to take away his liberty. he's had to live in hiding for a year. he's worried and stressed. he's glad he finally has his day in court and this is ver

manalo, tim smith, wagner. everybody else who saw those injuri injuries. okay. you don't need a graphic but you do still get me going over some of the instructions with you. reasonable doubt. what is it? can't tell you any more than we have. the judge read it to you a couple times already and you'll get it again. reasonable doubt, don't start with the premise. presumption of innocence sticks and stays until it is taken away by evidence that convinces you beyond a reasonable doubt that it is no longer appropriate to consider mr. zimmerman innocent. then and only then do you get to convict my client of anything. reasonable doubt is not a mere possible doubt. if you got to make it up, it's not a reasonable doubt. we talked about me proving my case as though i had to. it's not a -- speculative doubt or forced doubt. if you have a gout and you say i'm going to force myself to believe it, that would be a forced doubt. a reasonable doubt is not a mere possible doubt or speculative or imagery or forcive. such a doubt would not influence you to return a verdict of not gu

manalo. again, lying about that. because he's trying to justify to the police that he was searching because, of course, the victim had to have something in his hand, meaning some kind of weapon that would've caused him to resort to the shooting him. >> he sat up -- yes, sir, he was on top of me like this and i shot him. and i didn't think i hit him because he sat up and said, oh, you got me. you got it, you got me, something like that. so i thought he was just saying i knew you had a gun now, i heard it, i'm giving up. i don't know if i pushed him off me or he fell off me or either way. >> first he says he assumed he hadn't shot him but he had to push him off of him. does that make sense? i guess when he said you got me he kind of fell into him when he hadn't been shot. and, again, this is just in written form some of the stuff you've already heard. just trying to remind you of some important stuff. you've also got and i'm not going to play it for you, you've got a clubhouse video that's very short. there's clips of

manalo had there. >> it was part of his house. >> there was no evidence that it was used as a tool orm jim or anything like that? >> none whatsoever. >> and you would agree that an expert, or if he's qualified as an expert. medical examiner, or assistant medical kpeupber would be better qualified as to the findings he made versus you saying what he said? >> yes, sir. >> you would defer to a medical examiner would you not? >> absolutely. >> mr. mahr asked you a question about the burglaries that were being committed at twin peak lakes, and you determined that there were some. >> yes, sir. >> and the defendant had made calls about them, right? >> yes. >> are and i think referred to it as a black male, right? at least one of them he referred to. do you know whether the other individuals he had called on were black males or not. >> from what i call researching, then, yes, they were. >> would you say that that is a rerog torrey term -- bill: very compelling testimony. chris serino has been on the stand for an hour and a half already this morning. we are going to take a very quick break. we

mize manalo saying it was off to the right. she said it started sort of outside her window. so, we know that the altercation and certainly seems to have started and that somehow it got dragged down to the area where trayvon martin was actually shot. i am going to show you what mr. de la rionda mentioned. this is an animation. this is not evidence. does not go back there with you. it is just an overview of some of the evidence and how it may look in the context of it. so, if it works, we're going to spend a moment to just look at it. it only runs about a minute, minute and a half. it does have a 911 call on it because it is used to sort of set the scene a little bit as far as timing. and then i'm going to come back and sort of explain some of why what is in there is in there. only if it works, though. what is the chance of that. if we disconnect one item and put on another. you don't know or it shouldn't? great. may i have a moment, your honor? >> you may. >> okay. a couple assumptions and a couple problems with this. you'll see where they started. i have mr. martin sort of a

manalo, jonathan, same thing. looked like he got his butt beat and staggering to the ground. ricardo ayala, spd, the hands under the body. you know, if that is a concern of yours that my client dared to testify in his statement that he took his hands out out of fear for a weapon and that that is contraindicated because trayvon martin's hands -- look at the picture, by the way. one hand's not really under him, but the other seems to be. that that is an inconsistency for which you should impute ill will or hatred or spite be, that's absurd. andty mayo, dr.ty mayo said it was. ten or fifteen seconds of talking or moving not only is it possible, it's probable. stair shah livington, the emt who was there, you heard about the injuries, what she did. timothy smith important because, you remember him, he was the first one on the scene. took george zimmerman into custody for his own protection. he was the one george zimmerman talked to twice about screaming for help before he knew there was any 911 call suggesting it. lindsay folgate, she was the first one who mentioned mma style. nak

manalo, tim smith, wagner, everybody else who saw those injuries. okay. you don't get graphic, but you do still get me going over some of the instructions with you. reasonable doubt. what is it? can't tell anyone. judge has read it to you a couple of times, you're going to get it again. reasonable doubt, don't start with the premise, presumption of innocence sticks and stays until it is taken away by evidence that convinces you beyond a reasonable doubt that it is no longer appropriate to consider mr. zimmerman innocent. then and only then do you get to convict my client anything. a reasonable doubt is not a mere possible doubt because you've got to make it up. that's not a reasonable doubt. we talked about me proving my case as though i had to. it's not a speculative doubt or a imaginary doubt or a forced doubt. if you have a doubt and you say to yourself, you know, i don't buy this doubt, i'm going to force myself to believe it, that would be a forced doubt that isn't reasonable. but a reasonable doubt not a near possible doubt, speculative, imaginary o

the first -- in fact the first person that actually came out before the officer was a person named manalo>> yes, jonathan. >> >> we've got to take a break. we'll be right back. uh-oguess what day it is!is?? huh...anybody? julie! hey...guess what day it is?? ah come on, i know you can hear me. mike mike mike mike mike... what day is it mike? ha ha ha ha ha ha! leslie, guess what today is? it's hump day. whoot whoot! ronny, how happy are folks who save hundreds of dollars switching to geico? i'd say happier than a camel on wednesday. hump day!!! yay!! get happy. get geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. we know it's your videoconference of the day. hi! hi, buddy! that's why the free wifi and hot breakfast are something to smile about. book a great getaway now and feel the hamptonality >>> fascinating part of the trial,serino is being questioned by the prosecution about inconsistencies. he's specifically talking about exaggerations that he felt george zimmerman was making during his interview. in particular, the extent of his injuries that zimmerman says he suffered

. >> do you recall, sir, the first person to came out before the officer, joe manalo. >> jonathan.o you recall he took some photographs out there? >> yes, i remember those. >> and one of them was state's exhibit 77. >> yes, sir. >> may i approach directly. and you recall in that photograph the victim's hands being underneath his body? >> yes, sir. yes, sir. >> could someone say that was inconsistent with the defendant's statements that his hands were straight out, that he put his hands out? >> that positioning, yes. >> i'm sorry? >> that position as seen there, yes, it is. >> reporter: an attempt to show another inconsistency with zimmerman saying he had the arms outstretched but the arms of trayvon martin were folded under his body. >> dramatic testimony, indeed. don't go too far away. i want to bring in our legal analysts sonny hostin, mark najim, and jeffrey toobin. sonny, i want you to weigh in on what we just heard. what did you think of day seven in this dramatic testimony? >> in my view, wolf, day seven was a win for the prosecution. i mean, they came out of the box swinging