course, there are both exclusively complementary reviews and extremely negative ones, and you, marat sergeevich , very correctly said that this product, written by a direct participant eyewitnesses of the events. it should be considered precisely as a holistic product, because if you wish, you can pull quotes there, and these quotes are already pulling separate extremist portals, both in favor of one version and in favor of another, so a holistic picture is very important. as a result of reading this book, and there there are no options anymore, if at the initial stage, uh, i spoke out. uh, my assumptions are doubts about work, let’s say representatives of the e-law enforcement agencies at that period yes, and then at the end , it certainly becomes clear to me and the reader that sometimes it is better to use, let's say, unpopular methods to save the country from disaster, but it does not mean that my opinion expressed in the book is some kind of axiom. no. that's absolutely right. they say that those who saw in the writing of this book a desire to cause a public discussion to summarize the ava

marat sergeevich, you know, i would not argue so deeply that they were not ready for this issue.'m pretty sure there have been certain studies of their thought factories that have looked at these questions as an option. i admit, as an option, but here it is the second part of the question on the main one and it is in the following. why the west didn't want to see it, but didn't want to. he sees this because of his arrogance and habit of treating everyone else like a jungle. that's exactly the correct one. they believed in their impunity, they believed in their hmm loftiness, or probably, pick up such a word. in my permissiveness, i called it like this and a new iteration of western politicians who have not seen it. e relics of the soviet union who have forgotten what is great patriotic war. they were brought up, disdain for all other states, it was before it was a system. slavery, which was many years ago , it is at the heart of all this, but these people, forgetting that you can get an answer, as normal people say, decided that everything was permissible for them. and what happe

hmm, marat sergeevich that there is no added value for the president. this is human life.ed there. yes, he what he said, that nothing will change, except that put e zagu. hundreds, maybe thousands of human lives and no one cares, but the worst thing is that the current ukrainian authorities do not care about this. and here it is very important for us to see what the line that our president is pursuing and the policy of. it is, in principle, not only from the age of 14, it was determined much earlier and this line is aimed at saving the maximum number of human lives. and the most important thing is not to break the fraternal and friendly ties between the east slavic peoples, then, in principle, what the main policy of the anglo-saxons in our region is aimed at, therefore, he announced life, when a long time ago in the eighties , in my opinion, yes, he also announced this to book. yes, big, well, there the name is a little bit longer, but in principle, yes, uh, that's it. we are also discussing the issue of security, because it seems to me that he remembered such the most re

course, there are both exclusively complementary reviews and extremely negative ones, and you, marat sergeevichrectly said that this product, written by a direct participant to eyewitnesses of the events. it should be considered precisely as a holistic product, because if you wish, you can pull quotes there, and these quotes are already pulling, separate extremist portals, both in favor of one version and in favor of another, so a holistic picture is very important. as a result of reading this book , and there are no options there, if at the initial stage, uh, i expressed my doubts regarding the work, let's say representatives of the law enforcement agencies. at that time yes, and then at the end it certainly becomes clear to me and the reader that sometimes it is better to use, let's say , unpopular methods in order to save the country from disaster, but this does not mean that my opinion expressed in the book. it's kind of an axiom. no. that's absolutely right. they say that those who saw in the writing of this book a desire to cause a public discussion to summarize the available plast of inf

i faced a fierce reaction with persecution with hatred, probably, like you marat sergeevich and all state journalists who then took the path of saving the preservation of the country and manageability in the country, of course, it was it is not easy to survive and survive and those who watched from the side, they decided not to repeat this case. although then then. i needed their help, and together we could localize the situation, and it would not have grown to international sanctions . nearby, including because of cowardice. here is the totality of all factors led to the fact that the repetition of this case. no, not because they think it's wrong. no quietly in conversations. they all agree with me and now they are writing from abroad, how right you were, but publicly your knees trembled to stand next to the president, but i did not tremble. that is the question. we live really well. isn't it true that the world of public statements of justice goes along different vectors. all this, of course, is also important and very important, but in my system of coordinates there is sincere and moti

marat sergeevich, you know, i would not argue so deeply that they are not thoughts in which these issuesadmit as an option, as an option, but here it is the second part of the question on the main and she's next. why the west didn't want to see it, but didn't want to. he sees this because of his arrogance and habit of treating everyone else like a jungle. this is exactly the right word, which for decades uh, has been cultivated in western politics. they believed in their impunity, they believed in their hmm loftiness, or probably, pick up such a word. all permissiveness i called it like this and the new iteration of pouring in them was brought up contempt for all other states, it was before this system. slavery, which was many years ago, it is at the heart of all this , but these people, forgetting that you can get an answer, as normal people say, they decided that they are permissive because among the analytical community there is enough, but strong and there are people who look far enough, including life. no matter how hater he was of both russia and belarus and an extremely right pers

marat sergeevich, you know, i would not argue so deeply that they were not ready for this issue.ure there was some research into their factories thoughts in which these questions were considered, i admit as an option, as an option, but here it is the second part of the question on the main one and it is in the following. why the west didn't want to see it, but didn't want to. he sees this because of his arrogance and habit of treating everyone else like a jungle. this is exactly the right word, which for decades, uh, has been cultivated in western politics. they believed in their impunity, they believed in their hmm sublimity or perhaps that is the word pick up. in its permissiveness i would call it that and a new iteration of western politicians who have not seen it. e relics of the soviet union who have forgotten what is the great patriotic war. they were brought up contempt for all other states, it was before this system. slavery, which was many years ago, it is at the heart of all this , but these people, forgetting that you can get an answer, as normal people say, decided th

marat sergeevich, you know, i would not argue so deeply that they were not ready for this issue.hat there were certain studies of their factories of thought, in which these questions were considered, as an option, i admit, as an option, but here it is the second part of the question that is the main one and it is in the following. why the west did not want - to see it, but didn't want to. he sees this because of his arrogance and habit of treating everyone else like a jungle. this is exactly the right word, which for decades, uh, has been cultivated in western politics. they believed in their impunity, they believed in their hmm sublimity or probably, pick up such a word. in its permissiveness i would call it like this and a new iteration of western politicians who have not seen it. e relics of the soviet union who have forgotten what is the great patriotic war. they had brought up, disregard for all other states, it was before this system. slavery, which was many years ago , it is at the heart of all this, but these people, forgetting that you can get an answer, as normal people

course, there are both exclusively complementary reviews and extremely negative ones, and you, marat sergeevichvery correctly said that this product was written by a direct participant to eyewitnesses of the events. it must be considered precisely as a complete product, because if you wish, you can pull quotes there, and these quotes are already pulling, separate extremist portals, both in favor of one version, and in the benefit of the other, so a holistic picture is very important. as a result of reading this book, and there are already no options, if at the initial stage, er, i expressed it. uh, your assumptions of doubt regarding the work, let's say representatives of the law enforcement agencies. at that time, yes, and then at the end, it certainly becomes clear to me and the reader that sometimes it’s better to use, let’s say, unpopular methods to save the country from disaster, but it doesn’t mean that my opinion expressed in the book is some kind of axiom . no. that's absolutely right. they say those who saw writing this book, the desire to cause a public discussion to summarize, the av