it's we, matthew matthew and he went to kind of like the demo so, but then okay, you bet that most not present to the speed. i mean, there's a lose in the next, the months i was going to my go to the, to what i meant to for us we, they have the zip. unplugged douglas, still made a weird noise to we must have record of them, you know, not only on when that kind of the they as soon as the sort us in an enormous spot. so you can totally, people could have people more than 10. so what do you, what are the little boy and put it on the good? okay. well, try to study a movie content. don't they have a home on color segment, the motor for c o equal most the most the guy, and it start, it can be now that going to be starving to die. so you've got time is particularly the so now that you know a little bit about this new production of tunnels, in egypt by mode side, i'm going to take you on stage with our director of catalyst by the visa, one of the founders of law for those vows and the vision that of this new production of images i actually heard about the left. whereas the balance for the very

matthew — being outlined. that's right, matthew. the _ being outlined. that's right, matthew. the most - being outlined. utlined. that's right, - matthew. the most difficult time of the year for the nhs. matthew. the most difficult time of the yearfor the nhs. around the uk, this dispute is very much in england, and how leaders are really very concerned, to put it frankly. the strike before christmas, three days, is going to be difficult enough, but the really busy challenging time for the health service, particularly in hospitals and for ambulance services is in the new year after people come back in the new year holiday with pent—up demand because gp services and social care during public holidays are often scaled back. so that's six days from january the 3rd is going to be incredibly difficult for health leaders, for patients and for those working on the front line of the nhs, and it is the longest single strike byjunior doctors so far in this dispute. now, they argued that they have been in talks since late october, that they were prepared to talk and the attitude was constructive from the new health

matthew stadler . lynn. now matthew stadler. lynn. now matthew stadler. lynn. you, i don't know to where turn on this one. >> yeah, all you know is we're going to disagree very strongly. i do, massively, but of course. >> but i, i just i cannot for the life of me understand why anyone would look at the eu and think comes to peace , think when it comes to peace, when it to security , we when it comes to security, we what we really need is the eu which can't even meet its 2% on its nato commitments with the united states. of course we need the united states when it comes to these matters. we need both. >> what's controversial? well, because this poll says that actually the british people are apparently so now in hock with the eu. >> and ursula von der leyen is the best thing we've ever seen. >> a grown up politics means engaging with our allies. the eu is a massive bloc on our doorstep . they are our allies. doorstep. they are our allies. they've plenty of problems. they've got plenty of problems. as we know, america is our ally. that's got plenty of problems . t

matthew labour adviser matthew matthewt appears that we are being lied to about this government's ability to stop the small boats crisis. absolutely >> if i hear sunak say once more, i will do whatever it takes about this or any other issue . i mean, i shall scream . issue. i mean, i shall scream. of course we're being lied to. it is absurd. and as you said, we're paying all this money to france. the head of the unit in france. the head of the unit in france who was responsible for controlling the migrants has been on extended working from home quotes for about 18 home in quotes for about 18 months, taking his full salary. he just swims and golf . et he just swims and golf. et cetera. et cetera. they don't take it seriously. the french. they just taking our money. and it's i mean, it is a complete joke. they've nothing about joke. they've done nothing about it. suella about it. suella talked about nightingale hospitals. why haven't they been building over the last five, 13 years? places for migrants to stay. so they're not

matthew labour adviser matthew matthewt appears that we are being lied to about this government's ability to stop the small boats crisis. absolutely >> if i hear sunak say once more, i will do whatever it takes about this or any other issue . i mean, i shall scream . issue. i mean, i shall scream. of course we're being lied to. it is absurd. and as you said, we're paying all this money to france. the head of the unit in france. the head of the unit in france who was responsible for controlling the migrants has been on extended working from home quotes for about 18 home in quotes for about 18 months, taking his full salary. he just swims and golf . et he just swims and golf. et cetera. et cetera. they don't take it seriously. the french. they just taking our money. and it's i mean, it is a complete joke. they've nothing about joke. they've done nothing about it. suella about it. suella talked about nightingale hospitals. why haven't they been building over the last five, 13 years? places for migrants to stay. so they're not

residents right in front has, present 1960 democrat convention bodie thing of the story mat matthew. matthew90s he did in the chaos the conviction of the events that your that ultimately led to more people in writing and instructing the convention i think in 2024, that is the same thing, because the chicago residents whether it is the tent the city being built by the mayor of the house that whethers just joe biden's policies that are filling in the citizens of chicago and on the southern border of horses policies they are driving low-wage workers that are granted and the ability to work because there often times fraudulent, southern flames and some quiz, this is chaos is been completely caused by this administration and so the voters in the citizens of chicago still have a depressed what is happening. >> "fox news" reports of the protest are continuing across chicago they are about to read you do is costing them and they say president biden in the democrat mayor there, prioritizing, illegal immigrants the voters repay pythagoras with them in office they believe it is a billions of taxpayer d

matthew. jake sullivan will _ this war? exactly, matthew. jake sullivan will be _ this war? exactly, matthew. ing prior- sullivan will be meeting prior minister— sullivan will be meeting prior minister netanyahu and members of the lsraeli _ minister netanyahu and members of the israeli war cabinet. and gaza will he _ the israeli war cabinet. and gaza will he the — the israeli war cabinet. and gaza will be the main topic to be discussed. i think there have will be the main topic to be discussed. ithink there have been some _ discussed. ithink there have been some suggestions that they could be talking _ some suggestions that they could be talking about a possible timeline for the _ talking about a possible timeline for the israeli offensive in gaza. and obviously this visit comes after a number_ and obviously this visit comes after a number of statements from senior american _ a number of statements from senior american officials about what is happening in gaza. yesterday there were comments, the strongest yet, by president _ were comments, the strongest yet, by president biden, saying that the

wolfe , and journalist emma wolfe, and former advisor matthew former labour advisor matthew laza . going to you laza. i'm going to come to you first. matthewmatthew, what do you make of. the special? of. have you seen the special? >> seen the whole >> i haven't seen the whole thing. i've the thing. i've. i've seen the clips. outraged. clips. i'm not outraged. i mean, first frankie boyle first of all, frankie boyle criticising anybody good criticising anybody over good over they're in over jokes, whether they're in good not is, you know. good taste or not is, you know. yeah, that's i mean, it's quite something mildly. something to put it mildly. i mean , i think that, you know, mean, i think that, you know, gervais was just, was, just gervais was just, was, was just the they were fine. the right side. they were fine. i'm massive his. i'm not a massive fan of his. they didn't they weren't they didn't wild. they weren't wildly . i mean, wildly offensive. i mean, goodness me, you know, i'm old enough to remember the days of bernard manning and etc. this really territory. really wasn't in that territory. >> to >> it's been very interesting to s

is it in idea that if it matthew in the idea that if you're to lob accusations it matthew in the idea that if you there to lob accusations it matthew if you there right, then ccusations it matthew in the idea that if you there right, then you ations it matthew in the idea that if you there right, then you should out there right, then you should be back it up? be able to back it up? >> you know, >> absolutely. you know, i defend a lot with the labour party but kate party does. but kate kate osborne, the labour mp, osborne, the mp, the labour mp, they have her they didn't seem to have her facts straight. to get facts straight. you need to get your because your facts straight because otherwise your otherwise you undermine your argument. a lot argument. i used to write a lot of for people like of questions for people like you, patrick, and, and know, you, patrick, and, and you know, we source every fact, we had to source every fact, every we wanted every accusation we wanted to be put politician, whoever the put to a politician, whoever the politician you know, politician was. so, you know, you facts straight first. >> yeah, i think it

is it in idea that if it matthew in the idea that if you're to lob accusations it matthew in the idea that if you there to lob accusations it matthewhere right, then ccusations it matthew in the idea that if you there right, then you ations it matthew in the idea that if you there right, then you should out there right, then you should be back it up? be able to back it up? >> you know, >> absolutely. you know, i defend a lot with the labour party but kate party does. but kate kate osborne, the labour mp, osborne, the mp, the labour mp, they have her they didn't seem to have her facts straight. to get facts straight. you need to get your because your facts straight because otherwise your otherwise you undermine your argument. a lot argument. i used to write a lot of for people like of questions for people like you, patrick, and, and know, you, patrick, and, and you know, we source every fact, we had to source every fact, every we wanted every accusation we wanted to be put politician, whoever the put to a politician, whoever the politician you know, politician was. so, you know, you facts straight first. >> yeah, i think it's done.

, broadcaster and columnist lizzie adviser steve matthew>ur panel, broadcaster and columnist lizzie adviser steve matthew laza party adviser steve matthewh. >> hello. it's 535. i'm elizabeth callaghan in the gb newsroom , an idf official says newsroom, an idf official says israeli hostages mistakenly killed in gaza had been shirtless and holding up a white flag . israeli troops opened fire flag. israeli troops opened fire on yotam haim, samir talansky and alon shamriz after they were misidentified as a threat. they were killed in an area of intense fighting where hamas terrorists often wear civilian clothing and used deceptive tactics. a spokesperson for the idf called it a tragic event that happened due to the nature of the conflict . meanwhile the of the conflict. meanwhile the deaths of those hostages had have led to protests in israel and here in the uk , and here in the uk, pro—palestinian demonstrators gathered outside the israeli ambassador's house in london today. they called for an end to the bombardment of gaza and criticised the ambassador after she rejected a two state solution to the conflict . the uk solution to the confli

matthew? >> what is it, matthew? >> what is it, matthew? m too. you're just. you're the time. you're just lovely all the time. >> to blend into the >> i'm not to blend into the tree. >> ? worry- >> don't worry. >> don't worry. >> be gone. >> don't worry. >> i'm be gone. >> don't worry. >> i'm amazed gone. >> don't worry. >> i'm amazed gon(24% people >> i'm amazed that 24% of people think know, i think they're all, you know, i thought actually. thought the poll was actually. that's all polls we've that's of all the polls we've done that's the done together. nana. that's the one that's the result shock one that's the result of shock me, yeah one that's the result of shock me well, yeah one that's the result of shock me well, i'm yeah one that's the result of shock me well, i'm yea surprised >> well, i'm not surprised i wasn't viewers wasn't shocked. gb news viewers are quite fabulous. listen, i've got again , thank you so got to say again, thank you so much my brilliant panel. the much to my brilliant panel. the brilliant and also brilliant lo

matthew does? different view as matthew does? >> the house of lords >> probably the house of lords will much of that. will counteract much of that. the of lords cares about the house of lords cares about human rights. it cares about the rule . rule of law. >> care about human >> we all care about human rights the rule of law. rights and the rule of law. >> if i may, the >> well, if i if i may, the chairman of conservative chairman of the conservative party suggest a few party did seem to suggest a few weeks that the rule law weeks ago that the rule of law should is actually something that we you know, in this particular circumstance could actually get rid of. >> but this is all about the house of commons determining what the laws should be, and what the new laws should be, and we're to change our own we're entitled to change our own laws. absolutely. >> but as i said earlier, even if passes , as it has passed if this passes, as it has passed the even if it passes the the house, even if it passes the lords and we will see how that goes , it will then be challenged goes, it will then be challenged by the courts and again said even if it goes through the courts, be challenged by courts, it will be challenged by the european of human the european court of human rights. and even if it goes through that, it's not going to work. of this just to say work. so all of this just to say this is a massive distraction andifs this is a massive distraction and it's not going to. bring and it's not going to. so bring us anywhere. >> summary, everybody >> i guess in summary, everybody with this noise all this with all this noise and all this confusion grandstanding, confusion and grandstanding, i think all my guests, not a single one of you think that anybody's going to be sent to rwanda soon. do you rwanda anytime soon. do you think any before the general election? >> oh, definitely not. >> oh, definitely not. >> definitely not. they're from omar matthewaybe a few more home secretaries, maybe a few more home secretaries, a few more home secretaries might visit rwanda, but i don't think an asylum seeker is going to be sent meantime, the sent there. in the meantime, the cases and the things cases pile up and the things that should be done to stop the boats are not happening. so folks, it. folks, there we have it. >> won that >> the government has won that vote. and as matthew has just reminded me, we have sent three home to rwanda with home secretaries to rwanda with almost almost almost £300 million. it's almost 100 million per year. home secretary . i 100 million per year. home secretary. i mean, 100 million per year. home secretary . i mean, that in secretary. i mean, that in itself feels like a what the farage. but i have got a couple of amongst this of others amongst all this chaos and need little and madness. we need a little bit of levity, a little bit of humour . here bit of levity, a little bit of humour. here we go. so in wale

matthew, where you on it? >> matthew, where are you on it? >> matthew, where are you on it? ng >> well, that's a very good point, itacause we're thinking >> well, that's a very good point, it initiallyre're thinking >> well, that's a very good point, it initially ase thinking >> well, that's a very good point, it initially as far1inking >> well, that's a very good point, it initially as far as> a woman. >> if you were a woman. >> if you were a woman. >> michelle, you still would be you're still attractive me. you're

matthew whitaker. matthew, i want to start with you, in the united states, the fact says have to match the law. that's why jack smith didn't try trump on the charges. you look at precedent. this has been used a handful of times to practice confederates to disqualify someone like president trump. >> yeah, kaylie, good to be with you. i thought you did a great job outlining this. this is a very undemocratic unconstitutional move. this is a close call for them. it was a 4-3 decision. when you take someone off the ballot and disqualify a candidate, it should be with unbelievable evidence. the facts are very thin. one of the main facts is the january 6th commission report as we all know was a hyper partisan never trump type thing, and it was done by nancy pelosi, adam schiff and others. the other thing we need to do, the historical context is very important. the people that wrote the 14th amendment in section three of that knew what an insurrection was. they have seen hundreds of thousands of their fellow citizens killed in a war between the states. they knew what an insurrection was. there was a riot at the capital and those have been held accountable. president trump said go peacefully and have your voices heard. this court ignores anything that's evidence that helps president trump and the supreme court will have the final say and i expect will reverse the ruling. >> so we hope that's the case. a lot of people say, can't we write in trump's name in colorado? the opinion in colorado says, the secretary may not list president trump's name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot nor may she count any write-in ballots cast for him. literally taking the away the will of the people. >> this is election rigging, kaylie, it was a narrow 4-3 decision. it will be reversed by the supreme court. the insurrection clause in the 14th amendment was designed to go against confederates who took up arms in the war. you fast forward and donald trump isn't accused for insurrection. certainly jack smith, the special council would have charged him with it. to remove trump from an ballot for an offense he hasn't been tried or convicted of, what is that? that's violating his right to due process which just happens to be guaranteed by the very amendment, the 14th and elsewhere in the constitution. there's another factor here, kaylie, you know this is a lawyer under past supreme court rulings the language used in the insurrection clause doesn't apply to the office of president or anybody running for it. colorado officials here have i think brazenly manipulated the clause for purely political reasons, another example of election interference by trump oppo opponents. this is an effort, make no mistake to deprive american voters of their right to make the decision as to who should be president. it is anti-democratic, it's the equivalent of rigging the ballot box. and it will surely be seen that way only inflaming voters and i think boosting support for the former president. >> matthew, greg makes a really important point. there's been peer-reviewed articles. josh blackman down in texas made the point greg made. this is not intended to be applied to section three. you're confident the supreme court overturns this? >> i am. to that point, this talks about officers but lists of many, senate, congress, many offices that could be held and specifically excludes the office of the president. the supreme court of colorado says officer includes the president. there have been other state supreme courts that have looked at this. there have been other courts that looked at this issues and no one has been willing to go out as far as this supreme court of colorado has. the left is celebrating this today, but just remember, you know you have seven democrats that were appointed by democratic governors. i just see this as a completely partisan attempt. if you think about what the left is trying to do, they know that joe biden is very weak, the polls are not good for him. his policie

matthew stadlen and broadcaster mike parry. good morning to you both. this verdict then expected any second. it's quite a moment for prince harry, isn't it, matthew? he'll he'll be listening watching from from california even though there's quite a time difference . difference. >> he will and he'll be absolutely desperate for vindication. it's really vindication. but it's really difficult isn't it, to talk about this until we actually know what the result of the case is. i think the mirror group, right at the start of this process, apologised to prince harry. so we'll see what the judgement holds in store. i mean, let's remember the news of the world and you all know this. that was shut down, wasn't it, because of because of hacking. so not going to speculate, so i'm not going to speculate, but it's big moment. yeah. but it's a big moment. yeah. >> news of the world obviously went down because of the milly dowler okay. and that's went down because of the milly dowl> the newspapers do sometimes tend to club together on the harry story, because you've got the right leaning daily mail, perhaps almost sending out a sort of smoke signal of sympathy to the mirror because they've got harry dressed up here by his employer , later by the actor in employer, later by the actor in the crown with a swastika on his arm up a little bit. >> matthewean, do we want to see it? >> well, well, it's just if you're describing it, it helps just to quickly say it. okay >> i mean, just the point i'm making that on the day of making is that on the day of this huge judgement, you've got prince harry wearing a swastika because what do because that's what he did. do you remember? yeah. when you remember? yeah. when he when he the news he dressed up, that was the news of the world story as he of the world story as well. he dressed up a nazi. so there's dressed up as a nazi. so there's a sense in which if you take on the tabloids, you you take on one you're on one tabloid, you're taking on all them. is no all of them. there is no politics in this. >> i understand exactly what you're but all the you're saying, but all the newspapers, particularly in the tabloid world, are saying we have a code behaviour which have a code of behaviour which we we don't we feel is acceptable. we don't think needs to be taken apart think it needs to be taken apart

matthew. thanks, edwina. thanks, lisa. th'this. athe thanks, matthew. thanks, edwina. thanks, lisa. th'this. athe festive ;, matthewanks, lisa. th'this. athe festive treat,:hew. so this is the festive treat, not just but for you at not just for me, but for you at home where get to home as well, where i get to turn tables on leigh and his turn the tables on leigh and his infamous yes no quiz. >> he's the one who's going to be doing the answering. and i'm not left in the corner for once. so leigh. so remember the rules, leigh. five yes. no answers five questions. yes. no answers and you're only able qualify and you're only able to qualify one answers. let's one of your answers. so let's kick with think the kick off with do you think the gap too big between rich and gap is too big between rich and poor? no i was gonna say if i was that slow, you'd kill me. um, do you think mrs. thatcher is a heroine? yes. do you support keir starmer's plan to use terror legislation to stop the small boats gangs to smash the small boats gangs to smash the small boats gangs? yes and will parliament only be truly representative of the co

matthew does? different view as matthew does? >> the house of lords >> probably the house of lords will much of that. will counteract much of that. the of lords cares about the house of lords cares about human rights. it cares about the rule . rule of law. >> care about human >> we all care about human rights the rule of law. rights and the rule of law. >> if i may, the >> well, if i if i may, the chairman of conservative chairman of the conservative party suggest a few party did seem to suggest a few weeks that the rule law weeks ago that the rule of law should is actually something that we you know, in this particular circumstance could actually get rid of. >> but this is all about the house of commons determining what the laws should be, and what the new laws should be, and we're to change our own we're entitled to change our own laws. absolutely. >> but as i said earlier, even if passes , as it has passed if this passes, as it has passed the even if it passes the the house, even if it passes the lords and we will see how that goes , it will then be challenged goes, it will then be challenged by the courts and again said even if it goes through the courts, be challenged by courts, it will be challenged by the european of human the european court of human rights. and even if it goes through that, it's not going to work. of this just to say work. so all of this just to say this is a massive distraction andifs this is a massive distraction and it's not going to. bring and it's not going to. so bring us anywhere. >> summary, everybody >> i guess in summary, everybody with this noise all this with all this noise and all this confusion grandstanding, confusion and grandstanding, i think all my guests, not a single one of you think that anybody's going to be sent to rwanda soon. do you rwanda anytime soon. do you think any before the general election? >> oh, definitely not. >> oh, definitely not. >> definitely not. they're from omar matthew more home secretaries, maybe a few more home secretaries, a few more home secretaries might visit rwanda, but i don't think an asylum seeker is going to be sent meantime, the sent there. in the meantime, the cases and the things cases pile up and the things that should be done to stop the boats are not happening. so folks, it. folks, there we have it. >> won that >> the government has won that vote. and as matthew has just reminded me, we have sent three home to rwanda with home secretaries to rwanda with almost almost almost £300 million. it's almost 100 million per year. home secretary . i 100 million per year. home secretary. i mean, 100 million per year. home secretary . i mean, that in secretary. i mean, that in itself feels like a what the farage. but i have got a couple of amongst this of others amongst all this chaos and need little and madness. we need a little bit of levity, a little bit of humour . here bit of levity, a little bit of humour. here we go. so in wales, where t

wolfe , and journalist emma wolfe, and former advisor matthew former labour advisor matthew laza . going to you laza. i'm going to come to you first. matthewew, what do you make of. first. matthew, what do you make of the first. matthew, what do you make of. the special? of. have you seen the special? >> seen the whole >> i haven't seen the whole thing. i've the thing. i've. i've seen the clips. outraged. clips. i'm not outraged. i mean, first frankie boyle first of all, frankie boyle criticising anybody good criticising anybody over good over they're in over jokes, whether they're in good not is, you know. good taste or not is, you know. yeah, that's i mean, it's quite something mildly. something to put it mildly. i mean , i think that, you know, mean, i think that, you know, gervais was just, was, just gervais was just, was, was just the they were fine. the right side. they were fine. i'm massive his. i'm not a massive fan of his. they didn't they weren't they didn't wild. they weren't wildly . i mean, wildly offensive. i mean, goodness me, you know, i'm old enough to remember the days of bernard manning and etc. this really territory. r

this is matthew kacsmaryk. matthewaryk is an appointee of donald trump and he is a staunch opponent of abortion rights. everyone knows that. so it's no surprise when judge kacsmaryk ruled in the plaintiffs favor. he suspended the food and drug administration's longtime approval of mifepristone audaciously trying to pull the drug from shelves nationwide the supreme court stepped in to put that ruling on pause keeping the drug on the market while the appeal moved forward. but in august, the right-wing judges on the right-wing fifth circuit upheld part of the ruling. they said that the fda's decision years ago to allow mifepristone to be taken later in pregnancy email directly to patients and be prescribed by a medical professional other than the doctor were not lawful. they didn't like the way that the fda did it back in 2016 or whatever. that, of course, what dramatically limit access to the medication and the availability to get safe abortions. and now, the supreme court says that they will take up this case. this is t

matthew they won't. they just they. no. matthew they won't. they justwell, they. no. matthew they won't. they justwell, we ey. no. cond day of this biggest nhs history, it nhs strike in history, and it really is junior doctors really is the junior doctors who are the most are proving the most intransigent to intransigent when it comes to agreeing pay pay agreeing to a pay rise or pay offer from the government . offer from the government. labour sort of being quite labour are sort of being quite vague which course, you vague, which of course, you know, their privileged know, that is their privileged position. can be bit position. they can be a bit vague position, but they are saying, you know, if we were in government, we'd be able to hash out deal far better than the out a deal far better than the conservatives can. so obviously they're not going to put a number on i think there has number on it. i think there has been a breakdown of been is a huge breakdown of trust between the junior doctors and think there is >> and so i think there is actually that it's not just baloney labour baloney to say that that labour w

matthew, on. uh let's be matthew, come on. uh let's be honest . the matthew, come on. uh let's be honest. ausing all sorts of trouble. but are all these issues going away these issues going to go away if there's a labour government elected with a reasonable majority? let's very strongly hope that they will go away. >> i mean, ijoked yesterday hope that they will go away. >> i mean, i joked yesterday on twitter that under a labour government var, the var system might improve. it's not going to be it can't get any worse. it's not going to be nirvana under keir starmer and actually that's a point that vince cable made to me in same podcast me in this same podcast i interviewed for recently. interviewed you for recently. his worry that when and his worry is that when and i think he said when, not if, keir starmer deliver after think he said when, not if, keir staryears, deliver after think he said when, not if, keir staryears, there 'er after think he said when, not if, keir staryears, there coulder think he said when, not if, keir staryears, there could be a two years, that there could be a s

matthew, what matthew, have you and what happened ? happened? >> not yet. but i don't >> not yet. not yet. but i don't know whether we've got a picture of it, but been carrying of it, but i've been carrying on, bragging today, aren't i? >> you are bragging, matthewcause it feels like a sort of tradition. >> are we allowed to say blue jobs well sure. jobs anymore? well i'm not sure. my wife, wife . what does that mean? >> i'm not that job for man. >> job for a man. blue, my man. >> job for a man . blue, my wife >> job for a man. blue, my wife insists. so is not insists. so this is not something ever bought something that i ever bought into. now. i have into. but now. now i have certain that are blue certain jobs that are blue jobs. i mean, to do otherjobs i mean, i have to do otherjobs as well. >> like taking the bins. >> like taking out the bins. >> like taking out the bins. >> yeah. anyway we digress. basically, lots of are basically, lots of us are getting injured. i've never got injured. interested injured. i'd be interested to know you 5% of know whether you have 5% of people surveyed had hurt people have surveyed had hurt themselves tree. themselves lifting the tree. hence tree. hence my mentioning of the tree. another 5. that's nearly 2.7

what about matthew mcconaughey? no matthew mcconaughey. [laughs] what about beyonce?back into bed with celebrity candidate, we got to be honest about how effective they would really be. just because you know how to run a company, it doesn't mean you don't want to run country. just because you can play a politician, it doesn't mean you know how to legislate. just because you can stop bullets with your hand... that might be helpful actually. it would've helped kennedy. [audience reacts] i'm not saying celebrities can't become politicians, but maybe we don't let them start at president. because you can't squeeze years of political experience into a training montage. and besides, if celebrities want to run the country, they already have a place for that in our society. and that place is the illuminati. all right, when we come back, jelly roll will be joining me on the show. so don't you go anywhere. [cheers and applause] shred it. mix it. add a little kick to it. make tacos. more tacos. now we're talking. the kitchenaid bowl-lift stand mixer has the capacity to get you st

>> well, it's interesting >> aaron well, it's interesting that matthew's that matthew, i know matthew'sig critic of the tories, but not the same country ten, 20 not the same country i ten, 20 years well, the tories have years ago. well, the tories have been governing country for been governing the country for the years. agree in the last 13 years. agree in 2011, cameron, think, 2011, david cameron, i think, and his government the and his government withdrew the nursing instance, an nursing bursary for instance, an appalling nursing bursary for instance, an app'national self destruction and national self destruction and national self destruction and on infrastructure, on training people, on housing, on issue after issue after issue . issue after issue after issue. the status quo isn't functioning . and at the forefront of that failure have been the conservatives since 2010. >> yes . >> yes. >> yes. >> yeah. and i can tell you now lots of people i mean, susan said cameron , oh, no, no, no. said cameron, oh, no, no, no. that was your suggestion. i don't want whether whether or not cameron

matthew stadlen. matthew, thank you very much for your time as ever. i mean, come on, matthewu know as well as i do that this is just it ain't going to go anywhere, is it? this is just going to be another it's 2.0 and we're going it's rwanda 2.0 and we're going to be talking about offshoring . to be talking about offshoring. that happen . that ain't going to happen. >> first of all darren happy christmas. happy boxing day. >> and to you i'm really curious about these labour plans . about these labour plans. >> keir starmer knows that he has to have some sort of plausible answer to the taunts that he receives across the floor of the house of commons when rishi sunak responds to starmer's understandable criticism about rwanda criticism about the rwanda fiasco with questions such as well , what fiasco with questions such as well, what are you guys going to do? and statement such as you haven't got a clue , labour haven't got a clue, labour hasn't got a clue to what do. so labour have been out of power now for 13 years. years. they've had a lot of time, even under keir starmer's l

matthew stadlen. matthew thank you coming in. it does seem you for coming in. it does seem as if the inquiry just wants to look at whether we should have locked down sooner and harder rather looking at whether rather than looking at whether lockdown principle. lockdown was right in principle. >> jacob, you wouldn't be seeking to undermine a public inquiry, would you? before whether it's come anywhere near its findings , surely we its findings, surely not. we have them do their job have to let them do their job first. as you know , it's first. as you know, it's a barrister's job to be adversarial, barrister's job to be adversarial , to ask difficult adversarial, to ask difficult questions . it sounds to get his questions. it sounds to get his facts right , though. facts right, though. >> shouldn't get this line on the uk having worse figures than than italy is something that was thought early on but has thought very early on but has more sophisticated figures have come . that's well come available. that's well known not to be accurate . known not to be accurate. >> i'm not overly worried by the performance of a sort of random kc i'm not being i don't mean to be impolite to this particular barrister . barrister. >> i think you said the rudest thing about impossible. a random kc he'll be appalled his or prop will be thoroughly dented. i'm sure he'll survive. >> but i wonder whether you might be prejudging the findings of this inquiry because you introduced this segment by talking about how we had already a wonderful prime minister in the shape of boris johnson. that's not my view and it's not the view of a lot of people, including those who lost including many of those who lost loved this deadly disease. >> i understand that. let me get to your first point on challenging the inquiry. i think you challenge inquiries you should challenge inquiries as going through because as they're going through because sometimes operate in their sometimes they operate in their ivory towers and they come out with reports. so the with absurd reports. so the leveson report, which was very long but not actually very good, the hutton inquiry, which by the time it came out, looked deeply foolish and that it's almost one's job as a politician and yours as a commentator writer to be trying to say to them, look, are you sure you're not going down a blind alley? >> didn't you do this, though, with the sort of partygate invest allegation into boris johnson to prejudge, johnson trying to prejudge, judge public judge and undermine public confidence something was confidence in something that was very important ? and as far as very important? and as far as i understood it, not a single mp objected the idea of that objected to the idea of that investigation before happened investigation before it happened on that you asked on the question that you asked me reasonably , should me reasonably, should this inquiry at the question of inquiry look at the question of whether or not we should actually have looked down at all? i do that it is all? i do think that it is absolutely essential that the inquiry does its very to best answer that question. whether or not it will be able to do that. i don't know, because i think that's very important. >> you see, i think i think that we shouldn't have done, but i accept that that may be wrong and that we need to look at the evidence, particularly comparing our experience with sweden and really interestingly, i mentioned the lockdown over christmas when a micron was at the forefront. the behavioural changes that people adopted for themselves when trusted themselves. when you trusted people to lead their own lives. well, it's very interesting you bnng well, it's very interesting you bring that up because i was sort of locking myself down towards the end of february, early march of 2020, i was a prisoner on a different channel, a channel you were once a presenter on on lbc, and i got immensely anxious by this virus, not because i thought i was going to die from it or be severely unwell from it, but because i worried that i might be a vehicle by which someone else might die, die from it. >> and so i it.— >> and so i was very, it. >> and so i was very, very cautious at a great cost to my personal mental health. i've written a long piece, a long read in the new statesman, about the which my mental read in the new statesman, about the suffered.|ich my mental read in the new statesman, about the suffered. of my mental read in the new statesman, about the suffered. of course,�*ntal health suffered. of course, that's a drop the ocean that's a drop in the ocean compared to people who actually lost and lost loved lost their lives and lost loved ones. finish the ones. and just to finish the point, seemed blindingly point, it seemed blindingly obvious me , and i'm an obvious to me, and i'm an amateur. scientist , amateur. i'm not a scientist, i'm not politician. i'm not an i'm not a politician. i'm not an expert on infectious diseases, but at the but just standing back at the time, seemed obvious to me time, it seemed obvious to me that we were to have to that we were going to have to lock and lock down. and also extraordinarily me, i think extraordinarily to me, i think that boris johnson until that boris johnson took until was 23rd march to do so? >> i was in the cabinet at the time and we were absolutely being told by the government scientists that if you lock down too early, people would get bored of lockdown and you would simply have a peak that simply have a second peak that was than the first peak. was worse than the first peak. i mean, i sat in meetings where we were that. so what were we mean, i sat in meetings where we we politicianst. so what were we mean, i sat in meetings where we we politicians supposed were we mean, i sat in meetings where we we politicians supposed to are we mean, i sat in meetings where we we politicians supposed to be we mean, i sat in meetings where we we politicians supposed to be to as politicians supposed to be to do when people who were supposed to about telling us to know about it were telling us to know about it were telling us to something different? to do something different? >> person who >> ultimately, the person who has responsibility has to take responsibility is the prime minister because they were his advisors, both political and scientific . we political and scientific. we were witnessing just let me finish question, finish answering the question, if we witnessing the if i may. we were witnessing the horrors of what was going on in northern lots of british northern italy. lots of british tourists were pouring back into britain from their ski holidays. we had had the paradigm of italy to work from. and the point here, i think it's a crucial one, whether like me, you broadly supported lockdowns at the time but are still curious to know whether it was the right answer or you desperately opposed them. the one thing we can all agree on is if you are going lock down, please god, going to lock down, please god, lockdown time so lockdown at the right time so that you at least save tens of thousands lives. thousands of lives. >> supported them at the time, >> i supported them at the time, but what i think is really notable is that of people notable is that lots of people did did. and if you did what you did. and if you look the peak of infections, look at the peak of infections, it's before we lock it's been passed before we lock down in and that's where i think it's so sensible to trust people to make their decisions. to make their own decisions. >> at boris johnson's >> let's look at boris johnson's own he says he own words today. he says he should twigged sooner than should have twigged sooner than he did about the seriousness of this disease . this disease. >> is certainly true , but >> that is certainly true, but we'd better move on. sadly but thank you, matthewou, matthew. coming up, just before robert jenrick shot resignation, suella braverman declared the tory party is facing electoral oblivion . ian facing electoral oblivion. ian if the new rwanda plan fails us and we'll be discussing that after these from your after these messages from your sponsors . >> you're listening to gb news radio . radio. >> welcome back. although subsequently overshadowed by robert jenrick resignation, it was a highly anticipated moment today in the house of commons when the former home secretary, suella braverman , addressed the suella braverman, addressed the house in her first speech since being sacked the prime being sacked by the prime minister. backdrop of minister. amidst the backdrop of the new rwanda treaty being signed yesterday mps signed yesterday with mps anxiously the promised anxiously awaiting the promised emergency legislation. heard emergency legislation. we heard some bold words from her, but i might let her do the talking herself comes down t

matthew stadlen, political commentator. i'm going commentator matthew stadlen, po startl commentator. i'm going commentator matthewh you, tator. i'm going commentator matthew stadlen, po start with you, conor.�*m going commentator matthew stadlen, po start with you, conor. what ng to start with you, conor. what are thoughts this ? are your thoughts on this? conon are your thoughts on this? conor, we're starting with you . conor, we're starting with you. conor, we're starting with you. conoris conor, we're starting with you. conor is he frozen that cold? conon conor is he frozen that cold? conor, can you hear me ? okay, conor, can you hear me? okay, let me let me go with i'm going to start with suzanne because she's nice and close next to me. go on. >> suzanne, i don't think there's any debate about this, really. we've from really. we've known from as early 2015 people are early as 2015 that people are coming are coming coming over. jihadis are coming overin coming over. jihadis are coming over in boats. um, nigel farage warned about this at that time, i remember, and he was slammed down for it. but at the same tim

matthew? aren't you, matthew? >> have any family. aren't you, matthew? >> and have any family. aren't you, matthew? >> and absolutely. but ly. >> no. and absolutely. but that's because spend that's great because i spend christmas uh, christmas with with, uh, you know, same of know, with the same group of friends for five years. yeah, but, know, it but, you know, look, i it growing it was just me and growing up, it was just me and my of my family were my mum. most of my family were in australia. you, sometimes in australia. and you, sometimes you you'd think, in australia. and you, sometimes youwell, you'd think, in australia. and you, sometimes youwell, know, you'd think, in australia. and you, sometimes youwell, know, people think, in australia. and you, sometimes youwell, know, people have. oh, well, you know, people have got table, got 50 people around the table, you christmas you know, for christmas dinner or not 50, but 15 maybe. and then think and i used then you think and i used to think, having think, oh, why aren't we having christmas then christmas like that? and then you a very you think

when we spoke with jason matthews of matthews financial and insurance solutions, he said that shoppersd stick to a budget plan and think long term to avoid a holiday or financial hangover. >> some of my clients have to work overtime. um, and when that comes wrong, they might have to get a second job or they might have to look for a tax, wait for their tax refund to come. but those are the drawbacks of it. if not, you're just killing yourself with a thousand swords where you just killing yourself, paying out, paying out, paying out and can never catch up. >> according to a gallup survey, americans estimate they'll spend an average of $975 on christmas and other holiday gifts this year. it's a 100% jump from a year ago to the highest level since gallup started tracking holiday spending back in 1999. >> all right. the de young museum in san francisco celebrating bay area artists with a special exhibit. it's called de young open, right? >> cctv's amber li takes us inside the exhibit to see and hear the stories behind the artwork. >> you see this incredible image of a city that's been parti

matthew. party adviser matthew. it's time for the part of for the quick quiz. the part of the my panel the show where i test my panel on other stories on some of the other stories that hitting the headlines that are hitting the headlines right matthew. okay. question play along question one, please play along at reason did bbc at home. what reason did bbc presenter marion moshi give for flicking the bird ? here it comes flicking the bird? here it comes . i love that . . i love that. >> what do you think? it's the eyes. >> what did she say? what was the answer? she said she was counting down to five to the gallery. what do you think? >> she was joking. >> she was joking. >> it was. was just a joke to >> it was. it was just a joke to the cameraman. >> it was. it was just a joke to the cafact,man. >> it was. it was just a joke to the cafact, she. >> it was. it was just a joke to the cafact, she was joking >> it was. it was just a joke to the cafthe she was joking >> it was. it was just a joke to the cafthe team,as joking >> it was. it was just a joke to the cafthe team, pretending to around the team, pretending to count down. both that. count down. we both got that. no, you didn't. no, you didn't. you didn't. >> it says counting down.

matthew whitakerit. matthew, i want to start with you, because in thefact s united states, the facts have to match the law. that's why to jack smith didn't charge trump on these charges. alsok smit, you at precedent, ts has been used, from what i can tell, a handful of times, to prosecuteed. was this intended the 14th amendment, section three, to disqualify someone like president trum p? e with >> yeah. caleb, good to be with you. and i thought you did a great job outlininthought eag. i mean, this is a very undemocratic, unconstitutional attempt that it really election interference by the colorado supreme court. ui this is a close call for them. it was a43 decision. y >> and when you take someone off the ballotou and disqualifyu a candidate, it should be withaf on believable evidence. >> and the facts are very thin . you know, one of the main facts they try to use pieces of evidence is the the january commission report, as we all know, was a hyper partisan nevertrump type thingrr that was donume, nancy pelosi, adam schiff and others. and they use those that factuali finding. but you're right. you know, jack smith, who investigated this did not charge insurrection. and i think the other thins.g that we need to do is theportan historical context is very important to thet.ople that wron the 14th amendment and section three of that new what anwas. insurrection was they had just seen hundreds of thousands of their felloe seen hw citizenl in a war betweenlo the states. >> and so they knew what an insurrection was. and in this casestates, you knot there was a riot at the capitol. those people that participated wereinsu held accountable and he been prosecuted for that. an now, at the end of the day president, trump said go peacefully and patriotically and have your voicesd e have b. and this court just ignores any anything that is evidence that helps president trump and the supreme court of the united statething s will clearl the final say on this. and i expect they will reverse this rulinthsupreme e finag. >> so so we hope that's the case. the supreme e reversing this, greg, because i had a lot of folks say to me, well han't can't we just write in trump's name in colorado? but i have a lininrump'se fromo the opinion here. the opinion in colorado says the secretaro y may not list president trump's name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, nor may she count an y write in votes cast for him literally taking away the will of thee people. >> yes, this is election , g, kelly. it was a narrow 4 toylie, it 3 decision. >> it will almost certainly, in my judgment, overturned by the u.s. supreme court deeause the insurrection claus is in the 14th amendment, as you point out, don't apply to the facts surrecti. >> it was intended to prevent confederates who literally took up14th arms against the governmt during the civil war from go. ing office >> you fast forward now 150 years roughly, and donald trump is not even accused of insurrection underd the federal statute. and if evidence reported that,cl surely jack smith, a special counsel, would have charged him with. >> so to remove trump from the ballot for an offenst.eied r that he hasn't even been tried or convicted of, what isonvicte? >> well, that's violating his right to due process, which just happens to be guaranteed el the very amendmen ht, the 14h and elsewhere in the constitution. thebut you know, there's anothr factor here, kelly. >> you know, this is a lawyer kar past supreme courtlawyer u rulings. >> the languagnder pase would bd in the insurrection clause does not apply to the office of president or anybody running for it. coloradounning f officials here i think, brazenly manipulatedel the clause for purely political reasons. another example of electionntere interference by trump opponents. >> thireby trumps is an effort,o mistake, to deprivevoters american voters of their right to make the decision o as to who should be president. it is anti-democrati c. it's the equivalent of rigginge the ballot boxba and. it will surely be seen that way, only inflaming voters and i think boosting support for the former president.rmer >> and matthew, greg makes a really important point right there. and there's been peer reviewed articles writtenrtant there' onh josh blackman, a professor down in texas, has made the point. greg, just made, which is this is not intended to apply to the president, section three, another argument in the president's corner. but you're confidento behree the supreme court overturns this. you're con yeah, i am. >> and to that point, you know, this talks about officer but -- but this many you know senate congress many offices that could be held but specifically the office of the president and now the supreme court of colorado's says officer includes the president. but, you know, there have been othee ve been r state supreme ce that have looked at this. >> there have been other courts that have looked at this issuerr . >> and nobody's been willing to go out as far as this suprems isno onee court of colo. >> and, you know, i mean, the left is celebrating this today. >> but, you know, just remember, you know

i'll get some more insight by welcoming back to tonight jason matthews from matthews financial and insuranceutions. thanks for being with us, jason. >> thank you for having me. >> we used to call this layaway back when we were kids. now it's called buy now pay later. how was it different than just putting things on a credit card? >> it's a little bit different in a couple of ways. usually when people do buy now, pay later. now you usually now you have to have usually like every two weeks to make you have a payment. and now we're seeing more buy now pay later actually charge you interest and that interest. and if you miss that payment, which 40% of americans have done, it could possibly be on your credit report as well. so it's not just that simple. layaway where you just put it there. your parents went every friday, made a payment when they got paid and there was no interest. now, there you're seeing a more and more charged interest, up to 30, which is 30. >> i was going to ask, which is more expensive buying those boots i want on layaway or buying them on my credit card? >> layaway. but not

matthew. because anti —semitism? matthew. because it anti—semitism? matthew. re of growing up . i grew ever aware of growing up. i grew up in a very jewish area of manchester, and i didn't i we of course, we know about hitler. we knew about the war that was of a different era, a different time. people didn't think like that anymore. >> people thought it was over, didn't they? i mean, so, yeah, i mean, pretty every school mean, pretty much every school kid holocaust, mean, pretty much every school kid rightly holocaust, mean, pretty much every school kid rightly at holocaust, mean, pretty much every school kid rightly at school. caust, mean, pretty much every school kid rightly at school. andt, mean, pretty much every school kid rightly at school. and i quite rightly at school. and i hope is every every school hope that is every every school kid. i think government must kid. i think the government must be congratulated it's be congratulated because it's announced you know, announced. i don't, you know, often the often congratulate the government, but it's announ

matthew _ himself. certainly a memorable legacy of matthew perry. - himself. certainly a memorable legacy of matthewury in the united states has ordered donald trump's former lawyer, rudy giuliani, to pay $148 million in damages to two election workers he falsely accused of vote tampering. mr giuliani had already been found liable for defaming the mother and daughter during the twenty—twenty election in georgia. after the ruling, mr giuliani slammed the order in comments to reporters. the absurdity of the number merely underscores the absurdity of the entire proceeding. so i am quite confident when this case gets before a fair tribunal, it will be reversed so quickly it will make your head spin. our north america correspondent nomia iqbal has been covering the story. a judge had already decided rudy giuliani had spread false information about these two women. ruby freeman and shaye moss, mother and daughter. during the civil trial, they both described how their lives had almost been destroyed after december three 2020 when rudy giuliani suggested both women, election workers, they were counting ball

i will tell you if your portfolio is diversified let's start with matthew in georgia. matthewwhat you got? >> good evening. my five stocks are airbnb, uber, axon enterprises, and even though it is like the rest of my group i have why ou to work out the butt spirit >> airbnb is hospitality. uber is travel, palantir that cyber security. clear, that is tough is like airport security and axon. we like axon. it is a platform for police. we have government work, government work, travel and travel and we have security government work. we have a real problem. i want to keep airbnb, i like uber, i can justify those two. i don't think i could justify these two together i think axon is better than palantir. i would like to see healthcare, i think maybe you mhr humana, i just do not like the signal talk. clear, there is no room in this game. that's why you're going to buy caterpillar. roberts in illinois. >> jim this is robert from i have autozone berkshire, twerking holdings, nvidia and nvr. >> i havsome work to do. autozone, they announced that they are buying back stock. stock is at 70

matthew, what do think ? >> matthew, what do you think? >> matthew, what do you think? well, i think that, you know, political is always political theatre is always entertaining, but it's not necessarily very important valuable. >> mean , it's, you know, >> i mean, it's, you know, seeing rishi squirm , i think you seeing rishi squirm, i think you say there'll be the row about who knew about out to who knew what about help out to eat out eat out to out, you who knew what about help out to eat orbutat out to out, you who knew what about help out to eat orbut actually out, you who knew what about help out to eat orbut actually what out, you who knew what about help out to eat orbut actually what worriesr know but actually what worries me is that the whole inquiry is coming from perspective, coming from one perspective, which the closing down. why which is the closing down. why didn't we close down more? why didn't we close down more? why didn't we close down more? why didn't we lock down sooner and deeper rather than asking, should we have locked down at all should we have

matthew perry, sharing the wish matthew once found with him. all that and tonight on "access hollywood." back to you. >> thank you. >>> here's what's coming up in primetime on nbc. at 8:00 an encore presentation of barry manilow's very barry christmas special. nine, "christmas at the opry." then live and local our 11:00 news. that's it for us here at 7:00. for everyone at nbc bay area, including our associate director, thank you for joining us. we hope you enjoy your evening. hope to see you back at 11:00. stay warm. ♪♪ ♪♪ >>> tonight on "access hollywood" -- brad celebrates turning 60 with girlfriend eye the nets. did they take their relationship to the next level in the city of love? >>> friends for nearly four decades, george clooney reveals a "friend" bombshell about matthewr huntley means two in a row for coach niall. how will they take the party to the next level? >> what can we talk about on

matthew perry. an autopsy shows matthew perry died from the acute effects of ketamine. >> it's very dangerous when you're so sedated. >> byron: perry was found unresponsive in his hot tub. the actor had a ang struggled with addiction, detailed in a memoir. jennifer aniston revealing she had spoken to perry the day he died saying, "he was happy." that's "nightline" for tonight. catch full episodes on hulu. we'll see you right back here monday. thanks for the company, america. have a good and safe weekend.

matthew. got to get some positivity in there. matthew. got to get some positivity in there- it's — matthew. got to get some positivity in there. bumpy. oh, i really appreciate you coming back out, honest. hayden is walking with emma today. she was brodie morgan. my daughter was bronwyn morgan. you know, a little link between the two of them. his daughter bronwyn was training to be a mental—health nurse when she took her life five months after brodie. it's the last thing you think about before you go to sleep, and it's the first thing you think about with the start of the day. i think you've just got to be strong. what emma's doing is an amazing thing and we've become good pals ever since. a cup of tea? a brew? oh, wow, i�*d love it. would you like to stop for a cup of tea, anybody? and after five miles, a spontaneous bit of local hospitality en route. ah, wow. oh, you�*re kind. look at that. just what we need! really emotional. imean, these... she's so brave and haydn's so brave, just... _ i cannot bear to think what they're going through every day. - i didn't think it would be - as emotional, but i've learnt so much in the sho

matthew, how did you get that success? it was _ 100. .. matthew, how did you get that success? it was because _ 100. .. matthewas - 100. .. matthew, how did you get that success? it was because hamas was l success? it was because hamas was facing massive pressure from the israeli defence forces, and they were desperate for a ceasefire. they understood the only way to have a pause in the fighting was to release hostages. by beefing up our pressure on them today, it is the best way to ensure the release or rescue of hostages favoured down the line. they won't release them because they've suddenly become humanitarians.— they've suddenly become humanitarians. . . ., humanitarians. that has to be clear. in terms humanitarians. that has to be clear. in terms of— humanitarians. that has to be clear. in terms of beefing _ humanitarians. that has to be clear. in terms of beefing up _ humanitarians. that has to be clear. in terms of beefing up your- in terms of beefing up your operations, what is the timeframe you are talking about? behind—the—scenes, all the reports suggest the americans are urging you to say you've go

. >> what about, um, matthew said this conversation that john has with matthew said, think with matthewnteresting. he talks about country's about becoming the country's best pong player. oh, no, best ping pong player. oh, no, he call it ping he said, don't call it ping pong. table tennis, table tennis player. >> give it a little bit of classiness. >> yeah, but he realised >> yeah, but then he realised when done it that there's when he'd done it that there's no there's no point. well, there's no legacy there. but it's been all this time. feel like that this time. do you feel like that sometimes your career, sometimes with your career, you know, you've spent all know, because you've spent all this cultivating this time cultivating your comedy think comedy career? um, do you think at you're older, at one point when you're older, you'll didn't i, you you'll think, why didn't i, you know, shoemaker? know, become a shoemaker? >> yes. but for a different >> uh, yes. but for a different reason matthew said he was. reason than matthew said he was. he was upset because he had, like, two little bi

matthew bryza and valery chaly. matthew bryza, ex-adviser of the united states secretary of state, former director of european and eurasian affairs at the us national security council, will be on the espresso tv channel. glory to ukraine, mr. ambassador, i congratulate you. glory to the heroes. what is happening in the world, what is happening in washington. we simply do not have time to react to extremely different and sometimes contradictory signals. on the other hand, we feel that the kremlin is celebrating. yes, they are preparing. to prolong the war, and they feel a certain weakness in decisions on the part of the so-called collective action, and we in ukraine are extremely worried, in particular, it is not only about the supply of weapons, but also about money, the ukrainian budget depends on american aid too much. the situation in washington is something completely unexpected for me, and based on our you previous conversations, which i really always love and appreciate, it's ... something completely unexpected even for the washington political elite, because the support, the continuation of military and financial aid to ukraine is very strong in the congress, so what happened is that a small group of extreme republicans , trump's supporters, the so-called maga group, were able to politically blackmail president biden, saying: "okay, we know you want this help for ukraine, maybe we do too, but we won't give it." her green light until you agree to what we we want, namely the protection of america's southern border. we are talking about the borders of ukraine and we want to protect them? yes, but let's secure the us borders first. i think it's ridiculous, irresponsible, and damaging to america's reputation in the world, but that's our reality. dear mr. ambassador, what signals are sent from the kremlin to washington, and who, for example, does putin signal to in washington besides trump, and how strongly does this generally affect american aid to ukraine? putin is very happy, he said about it the other day during his big press conference, which he missed last year because russia was not performing well on the battlefield. this year he held a big conference and said that he is sure that russia will win the war because the united states will lose patience with supporting ukraine. i think he's wrong, and the republicans who are causing this political mess about aid to ukraine will suffer politically, but ukraine is not better off, so this big political mess in washington is a big gift to putin, firstly, because he harms ukraine's ability to continue its offensive, and secondly, because it also undermines the united states' leadership in the world and our ability. to be the so-called leader of the free world. and this is the most shameful moment for american foreign policy that i can recall in my entire adult life. mr. ambassador, i take your forecasts and your assessments of the situation extremely seriously, and accordingly i would like to ask you now to answer honestly, what do you think ukraine should expect in the next couple of months from side of the united states. does mr. biden have a plan b? biden doesn't have a plan b, what he needs to do, and i hope he does, is to agree to what the country wants. republicans, namely to change their administration's immigration policy on the southern border of the united states with mexico and allocate more money for the southern border. i am not pessimistic about whether aid will come to ukraine or not. i am concerned about the timing, as the negotiations will continue for several weeks. knowing president biden, i think so in the end he will accept such political blackmail and give it to the republicans. what they are demanding for the protection of the us border with mexico in order to get this help for ukraine. this is a terrible precedent in american domestic and foreign policy. but i think that biden will eventually give in and ukraine will receive this money. the only question is when it will happen. yes, mr. ambassador, quite alarming signals are also coming from the other side, in particular, it is about various military-political-expert environments that say that ukraine should prepare for what to a deep, deeply echeloned defense, this means that perhaps we will not receive extremely important offensive types of weapons, additional, yes, for which we very much hoped, well, and accordingly, we also understand from the other side that the united states, well, perhaps they do not want to raise the degree of escalation, maybe certain consultations took place in third countries, maybe with the help of viktor orbán, maybe with the help of chinese comrades, yes... well, where was it said, for example, that a quick allocation for ukraine, the f-16 can fundamentally change the situation. i don't think the biden administration cares at all about what the chinese or viktor orbán say. orban is generally disliked in washington because what he is doing is clearly pro-russian. who knows what kind of corrupt connections are behind this, but he is definitely not trusted in washington. in a way, even worse for my country, what is happening is simply a sophisticated political case of blackmail by the extreme wing of the republican party of president trump, who, frankly, destroyed the political party i once loved. this is not about strategy, but about a terrible example of the internal political dysfunctionality of the united states. but i'm ... sure that ukraine will get f-16s and longer-range missiles, and it's a shame that the biden administration is taking so long to ask ukraine to provide these weapons. if they had secured it at the beginning, the situation on the battlefield would have been completely different, and of course, in favor of ukraine. well, literally this thursday, putin told his russian fellow citizens for several hours in a row about how cool he is, how he... manages to implement all this, in particular, russian aggression against ukraine, and he has not given any adequate signals that he is ready, so to speak, to enter into a different level of negotiation, at least in the public part about it it was not possible what is your overall vision of a possible major diplomatic connection? at the moment i don't think so, xinjin pin is trying to strengthen his partnership with president putin. to weaken the united states at the world level, and what is happening between shinjinping and putin, similar to what is happening in the united states congress with the republicans, precisely because biden wants this support for ukraine. the extreme republicans are opposed, so is xi jinping, who would welcome an end to the war, wants to undermine the leadership of the united states and biden's leadership in the world, so he is going to stay with putin. having said that, i believe sindpin, like erdogan here in turkey, would like the war to end, but for now he is more than happy to work with putin rather than push him to negotiations instead, he is ready to push ukraine into negotiations so that it gives up its sovereign territory, while simultaneously weakening the united states, unfortunately, it is so. antony blinken says about steadfast. today, president biden talks about resolute steadfastness, but who will pay the necessary amount of money into our budget, so we understand that it is not only about the support of our army, and in general also... about the macroeconomic stability of our state, and i see several problems, well and accordingly, if a great debate begins in the united states, which may end, for example, with a decrease in funding for ukraine, in your opinion, how actively will paris and berlin be ready to work to support us, that is, at what level 100%, 120% or 60%. the council of europe is currently debating money. for ukraine, which is blocked by viktor orban, it is about 51 billion euros, or thereabouts. i think he will give in eventually. orbán always behaves unstrategically in relation to the transatlantic community and selfishly, i.e. only for himself, only for hungary. so he will either give his consent together with other eu members to provide financial assistance to ukraine, or he will have no choice, if separate. member states will decide to do so, but it is quite obvious that many eu member states are going to provide aid to ukraine, regardless of what viktor orbán says. as you have already mentioned, among them are germany, france, great britain, although it is not a member of the eu, but will provide assistance, as well as the countries of northern europe. president zelenskyi visited oslo the other day, and the leaders of the countries of northern europe declared that they would provide ukraine with the necessary assistance. i believe that conjunction. the states will also provide it, it's just not politically possible for the united states to end its support for ukraine, they're delaying it because of this pointless internal political debate that i've already mentioned. i don't want to play a big conspiracy theory, but if there are forces in the west who want to hear, so to speak, putin's idea to stop financing ukraine, and then, they say, the war will end, it makes me feel creepy, so i 'm afraid that certain... environment is, and exactly on them, putin broadcasts his false signals and his propaganda, if we talk about the general stability of the west in the ukrainian issue and in the issue of russian aggression. as i said, there are extreme republicans in the united states who support trump and who support anything against biden, and they will never change. in addition, throughout the transatlantic family, both in the united states and... in europe , there are unknown political figures who receive bribes from russian services in exchange for defending pro-russian positions, and we all we often hear about such cases. i'm not saying that any american politicians are taking money from putin, but it's definitely happening in europe, and maybe it's happening in the united states as well. what i am trying to say is that in the end, not only the morality, the rightness and the strength of ukraine's struggle, which lies in its survival... will ultimately unite all of us in the transatlantic community to give ukraine the help it needs, but the strategic imperative will also drive us to do so. directly there are people who claim that by destroying such a number of russian military capability, ukraine is clearly not only doing a difficult, horrific and deadly job of increasing security for all of us, but also making it less likely that russia will ... go after ukraine and attack nato territory. smart people realize this, and we just need some time to sort out this ridiculous campaign politics in the us. what is being said in washington about general zaluzhnyi, and what, for example, could president zelenskyi and president biden discuss among themselves? as the scandal is enough for me, the use of the term "deadlock" by general zulzhnym is not only a situation in washington. but also fueling the debate in ukraine about whether president zelensky is not voicing an unrealistically positive assessment of the situation on the battlefield, really good sources of information about ukrainians for the us and allies are social networks, and it is clear that now the counteroffensive is not advancing on land, although it is in the black sea. the creativity of ukraine, its sea and air drones really caused great damage to the russian black sea fleet. forcing to relocate it away from ukrainian territory to novorossiya. the media is not talking about this story loudly enough. but in reality, the russians managed to dig in their defensive positions, making it much easier to dislodge them. at the end of the day, we in the west are not helping ukraine properly, because we still haven't given ukraine what it has been asking for for so long, namely f-16 fighter jets and longer-range missile systems, which are absolutely necessary for ukraine's success, so i believe that president zelenskyi it is important to be as honest as possible with the ukrainian people, with the united states and our allies. according to nato is that ukraine fights bravely and effectively, and no nato military would even dare to do what ukraine is doing without air superiority, which means that ukraine should get f-16s and longer-range missiles. prospects for the introduction of lendlease as a certain insurance mechanism. i hope that the american legislation has already taken all the necessary steps to start giving us weapons in case of something. in debt, i think that's possible, that's how the political situation in the us was developing a year ago, but now that we're in the crazy circus of the us presidential race, everything becomes unpredictable and depends on negotiations like the ones we talked about, about biden changing his policy on the protection of the southern border of the united states, in exchange for the agreement of extreme republicans to help ukraine. so at this point, god only knows what will happen. you remember we talked to you a few months ago, sir borkovsky, and i said that the fate of aid to ukraine largely depends on who will be elected as the next speaker of the house of representatives of the us congress. then it was about two candidates and neither of them was elected. and the speaker of the house of representatives is mike johnson, an ardent supporter of president trump, who ... is determined to force biden to take such a politically humiliating step and change his policy on immigration to the united states in exchange for support for ukraine, and this struggle will unfortunately continue for the next few months thank you very much, mr. ambassador bryza for this honest and extremely informative conversation on the air of the tv channel, i want to remind our tv viewers that matthewa, ex-adviser of the state secretary of spolucha, was currently working for them on spresso. states, former director of european and eurasian affairs at the us national security council, god bless america. glory to ukraine and the hero. glory. valery chaly, former extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine to the united states, former deputy director, will be working on the espresso tv channel. of the presidential administration on international cooperation. glory to ukraine. mr. ambassador, i congratulate you. glory to the heroes, congratulations, we want to summarize the dry results of president zelensky's visit, and this is not a story about a formal visit to our president, it is about very specific decisions that were made or postponed by the american administration. well, first of all, the dates that were in the request of the ukrainian side were not initially accepted by the partners, joseph biden did not have time for a meeting at that time, well, it happens, but there

matthew bryza and valery chaly. matthew bryza, ex-adviser of the united states secretary of state, former director of european and eurasian affairs at the us national security council, will be working on the tv channel. glory to ukraine, mr. ambassador, i congratulate you. glory. what is happening in the world. what is happening in washington, we do not have time to simply react to extremely different and sometimes conflicting signals, on the other hand , we feel that the kremlin is triumphant, yes, they are preparing to prolong the war, and they feel a certain weakness in decisions on the part of the so-called collective action, and we in ukraine are extremely worried, in particular, it is not only about supplies weapons, but also about money, the ukrainian budget depends on american aid. too much the situation in washington is something completely unexpected for me, and based on our previous conversations with you, which i really always love and appreciate, this is something completely unexpected even for the washington political elite, because support for the continuation of military and financial aid to ukraine is very strong in congress. so what happened is that a small group of extreme republicans, supporters of trump, the so-called mag group. was able to politically blackmail president biden, saying: "ok, we know you want this aid for ukraine, maybe we do too, but we won't give it the green light until you agree to what we want, which is to protect the southern border of america. we are talking about the borders of ukraine, and we want to protect them, yes, but let's protect the borders of the united states first. i think it's funny without. responsible and damaging to america's reputation in the world, but this is our reality. dear mr. ambassador, what signals are sent from the kremlin to washington, and to whom, for example, does putin signal in washington besides trump , and how strongly does this affect american aid to ukraine in general? putin is very happy, he said it the other day during his big press conference, which he missed last year because russia was showing itself on the battlefield, this year he held a big conference and said that he was sure that russia would win the war because the united states would lose patience with supporting ukraine. i think he's wrong, and the republicans who are causing this political mess about aid to ukraine will suffer politically. however, it is not easier for ukraine. so this big political mess in washington is a big gift for putin. firstly, because it harms ukraine's ability to continue its offensive, and secondly, because it also undermines the leadership of the united states in the world and our ability to be the so-called leader of the free world, and it is the most shameful moment for american foreign policy that i can recall in my entire adult life. mr. ambassador, i take your predictions and... your assessments of the situation very seriously, and accordingly, i would like to ask you to answer honestly now, what do you think ukraine should expect in the next couple of months from the united states, does mr. biden? biden has no plan b. what to him needs to do, and i hope he does, is to agree to what the far-right republicans want, which is to change his administration's immigration policy. on the southern border of the united states with mexico and allocate more money for the southern border. i am not pessimistic about whether aid will come to ukraine or not. i am concerned about the timing, as the negotiations will continue for several weeks. knowing president biden, i think he'll eventually fall for this kind of political blackmail and give the republicans what they want. what they are demanding in terms of protecting the us border with mexico in order to get this one. aid for ukraine. this is a terrible precedent in american domestic and foreign policy. but i think that biden will eventually give in and ukraine will receive this money. the only question is when it will happen. yes, mr. ambassador, quite alarming signals are also coming from the other side, in particular, it is about various military-political-expert environments, which say that ukraine should prepare for what? to a deep, deeply echeloned defense. it means that it is possible. we will not receive extremely important offensive types of weapons, additional, yes , for which we very much hoped, and accordingly, we also understand from the other side that the united states... well, maybe they do not want to raise the degree of escalation, maybe certain consultations took place in third countries, perhaps with the help of viktor orban, perhaps with the help of chinese comrades, so where was it said, for example, that the quick allocation of f-16 to ukraine could fundamentally change the situation. as far as i'm concerned, the biden administration does not care at all what the chinese or viktor orbán say. orban in general very much. disliked in washington because what he is doing is clearly pro-russian. who knows what kind of corrupt connections are behind this, but he clearly does not enjoy the trust of washington. in a sense, even worse for my country, what is happening is simply a sophisticated political case of blackmail by the extreme wing of the republican party of president trump, who, quite frankly, has ruined it. the political party that i once loved this is not about strategy, but about a terrible example of the internal political dysfunctionality of the united states. but i am sure that ukraine will get f-16 and longer-range missiles. and it is a pity that the biden administration is delaying for so long the request of ukraine to provide these weapons. if they had secured it at the beginning, the situation on the battlefield would have been completely different. and of course, in favor of ukraine. well, just this thursday, putin told his russian fellow citizens for several hours in a row about how cool he is, how he likes it all manages to implement, in particular, russian aggression against ukraine, and he has not given any adequate signals that he is ready, so to speak, to enter into negotiations of a different level, at least in the public part it was not discussed. your vision is generally possible. a large diplomatic connection. i don't think so at the moment. pin is trying to strengthen his partnership with president putin to weaken the united states on the world stage. and what is happening between xi jinping and putin is similar to what is happening in the united states congress with the republicans. precisely because biden wants this support for ukraine. extreme republicans oppose. likewise, xi jinping, who would welcome an end to the war, wants to undermine the leadership of the united states and biden's leadership in the world, so he is going to stay with putin. having said that, i believe that sindpin, like erdogan here in turkey, would like to see the war end, but for now he is more than happy to work with putin rather than push him to negotiate. instead, he is ready to push ukraine into negotiations. so that gave up its sovereign territory while weakening the united states. unfortunately, it is. anthony blinken talks about unwavering determination. president biden says he is resolute, but who will pay the necessary amount of money into our budget. yes, we understand that it is not only about the support of our army, and in general it is about the macroeconomic stability of our state, and i see several problems. well, accordingly, if a big debate begins in the united states, which may end, for example, in a reduction financing for ukraine, in your opinion, how actively paris and berlin will be ready to work to support us, that is, at what level, 100%, 120% or 60%. currently, the council of europe is debating money for ukraine, which is blocked by viktor orban, and it is about 51 billion yen. or so, i think he'll give in eventually. orbán always behaves unstrategically in relation to the transatlantic community and selfishly, i.e. only for himself, only for hungary. so he will either give his consent along with other eu members to grant financial aid to ukraine, or he will have no choice if individual member states decide to do so. however, it is quite obvious that many eu member states... are going to provide aid to ukraine, regardless of what viktor orban says. as you have already mentioned, among them are germany, france, great britain, although it is not a member of the eu, but will provide assistance, as well as the countries of northern europe. president zelensky recently visited oslo. and the leaders of the countries of northern europe declared that they would provide ukraine with the necessary assistance. i believe, that the united states will also provide it. it is simply politically impossible for the united states to accept... or its support for ukraine, they are delaying it because of these pointless internal political debates, which i have already mentioned. i do not want to play in a big conspiracy, but if in the west. there are forces that want to hear, so to speak, putin's idea, to stop financing ukraine, and then , they say, the war will end, i feel creepy, yes, i am afraid that there are certain circles, and it is to them that putin broadcasts his false signals and its propaganda, if we talk about in general, the stability of the west in the ukrainian issue and in the issue of russian aggression. as i said, there are extreme republicans in the united states. who support trump, and who support anything anti-biden, and they will never change. in addition, throughout the transatlantic family, both in the us and in europe, there are unknown political figures who receive bribes from russian services in exchange for defending pro-russian positions, and we are increasingly hearing about such cases. i do not claim that any of the american politicians take money from putin, but in europe it's... definitely happening and possibly happening in the united states as well. what i am trying to say is that in the end, not only the morality, the rightness and the strength of ukraine's struggle, which is its survival, will ultimately unite all of us in the transatlantic community to give ukraine the help it needs, but the strategic imperative will also drive us to do so. directly there are people who argue that by destroying so many russian military... everyone, but also reduces the likelihood that russia will go further after ukraine and attack nato territory. smart people realize this, and we just need some time to sort out this ridiculous campaign politics in the us. what is being said in washington about general zaluzhnyi and what, for example, president zelenskyi and president biden are discussing among themselves. in my opinion, the scandal surrounding general zuluzhnym's use of the term " stalemate", not only in washington, but also in ukraine, fuels the debate about whether voiced by president zelensky, an unrealistically positive assessment of the situation on the battlefield. social networks are really good sources of information about ukrainians for the us and its allies. and it is clear that now... the offensive is not advancing on land, although it is in the black sea. ukraine's creativity, its sea and air drones really caused a lot of damage to the russian black sea fleet, forcing it to relocate away from ukrainian territory to novorossiysk. the media is not talking about this story loudly enough. but on the dry russians managed to dig in their defensive positions, making it much more difficult to dislodge them. after all, me. we are not helping ukraine properly because we still have not given ukraine what it has been asking for for so long, namely f-16 fighter jets and longer-range missile systems, which are absolutely necessary for ukraine's success. therefore, i believe that it is important for president zelenskyi to be as honest as possible with the ukrainian people, with the united states, and with our nato allies, that ukraine is fighting bravely and effectively, and no military personnel on... not even would dare to do what ukraine is doing without air superiority, which means ukraine should get f-16s and longer-range missiles. prospects for the introduction of lendlease as a certain insurance mechanism. i hope that the american legislation has already taken all the necessary steps to start lending us weapons in case of something. i think it is possible. this is how the political s... situation in the usa developed a year ago, but now, as we enter the crazy circus of the presidential election race in the usa, everything becomes unpredictable and depends on negotiations like the ones we talked about, about biden changing his policy on protecting the southern border of the united states, in exchange for the agreement of the extreme republicans to help ukraine. so at the moment only god knows what will happen, you can think of a few. that's why we talked to you, mr. borkovsky, and i said that the fate of aid to ukraine largely depends on who will be elected as the next speaker of the us house of representatives. then it was about two candidates, and none of them were elected. and the speaker of the house of representatives became mike johnson, an ardent supporter of president trump, who is determined to force biden to take such a politically humiliating step. and change their us immigration policies in exchange for supporting ukraine, and this fight will unfortunately continue for the next few months. thank you very much, mr. ambassador bryza, for this honest and extremely informative conversation on the air of the tv channel, i want to remind our tv viewers that now matthewking for them on the air bryza, former adviser to the secretary of state of the united states, former director of european and eurasian affairs at the us national security council. glory to ukraine and heroes. glory. oh, there are no potatoes, you will bring them, but my son has caught something, i remind you, apply dr. tys’s comfrey ointment and you get up to work again, comfrey ointment, german ointment for joint and muscle pain, comfrey restores movement, from pain in joints and muscles, dr. tice natural comfrey ointment, try also dr. tice comfrey warming cream, a proven remedy. every day, every hour, every minute we receive a large amount of information. the most anticipated event of the year, which is actually happening on the front. what are the losses of personnel and equipment on the battlefield? how does the international community evaluate our successes and about what? bresha moscow. from the stream of news coming from all over the world, we single out the most important ones

matthew perry's death . matthew perry, of course, death. matthewin a hot tub just a couple of months ago. we've on months ago. we've got more on that . kinsey. that very shortly. kinsey. listen, i'm just touched there on matthew perry , one of the on matthew perry, one of the biggest comedy stars in the world, a very talented guy who died months in died a couple of months ago in his . and we've got his own hot tub. and we've got more about how he more information about how he died . died. >> i mean, very little mark, this is, they say, a result of ketamine and now the question is, what? because some of his close friends have said that he was going through a specific ketamine therapy, although no others argue that it was a week and a half ago, before his death. so it shouldn't have still been in his system. so now death. so it shouldn't have stilimystery his system. so now death. so it shouldn't have stilimystery surrounding so now death. so it shouldn't have stilimystery surrounding hisnow the mystery surrounding his death aside from ketamine and d