attorney joyce vance and former civil prosecutor maya wiley. joyce, what are they asking jeffrey clark today? >> well, i suspect they want a full accounting for what went on at the justice department in final days of the trump administration, particularly now that we've learned that the former attorney general bill barr stepped down just as these proposed orders that would have had d ofrmtsd or doj or dhs seizing voting machines, just as those were going into circulation. so a wide range of questions for clark who is, of course, a lawyer, who appreciates the fact that he can't just exert a blanket privilege and must show up and answer questions individually, the big outstanding question is whether this was a cooperative session and he's decided to share the truth with investigators or whether this amounted to a lot of i don't remember and i'm taking the fifth amendment. >> maya, the panel alleges clark stoked fear and election misinformation. if he doesn't talk -- that is a possibility -- what happens then? >> of course, the committee has to ta

joining me now, maya wiley, and former rnc chair michael steele. this is getting weirder and weirder. it is illegal to secret document from the white house. you're not supposed to flush them down the toilet of the residence. you're not supposed to eat them. but it seems that president trump did them all. put them in burn bags. it's almost like a comical mob movie. but as funny as it is, it makes you wonder if he's obsessed how they flushed because he's flushing things down the toilet. your thoughts? >> i don't know what to say about this one. i don't know what to say about this one. here's what i'll say -- look, number one, not only is this potentially a crime because of his obligation to send historically important material over to the archives, and that is what this says. 15 boxes, it becomes very difficult to believe it was not intentional when, if the reporting is true, that lawyers told him he had this obligation under the act, right? because one defense would be he didn't know. if he didn't know of his legal obligations, guilty of violating t

maya wiley is a civil rights attorney, former assistant u.s. attorney and lucky for us, they're both msnbc legal analysts. welcome, ladies. >> thank you. >> so, maya, let's begin with you. talk to us about where the committee stands right now. what its game plan looks like. talk us through what that plan looks like in their releasing the texts that we have seen so far publicly. >> yeah, i think what we're seeing, michael, is a continuation of what has been a very intentional strategy of queueing up for the public the story that has been unfolding in the over 500 witnesses and all the documents that they have pulled together to this point. we know that's a lot. we also know that they were also getting closer and closer directly to donald trump himself because they have subpoenaed folks like mark meadows and have actually had to move to compel that testimony. but, you know, i think what they're really gearing up for is the fact they need to have public hearings about what they're finding and what this is a way of continuingly showing the american

joining me now, maya wiley. it's so good to see you. let's talk about this.kson will be the only supreme court justice to have worked as a public defender. how important do you think is that experience? >> you know, that experience is critical. i just have to say, alex, it is impossible for me to have heard that call and not tear up because -- because it's not just an historic moment. to your point about both having a black woman but a black woman who has served in many different roles in her career and has many different vantage points around the legal questions that will come to her on the supreme court and come to all the justices on be the supreme court. in our history ultimately about 7% of all federal judges have any public defender background experience. only 1% on appellate courts and zero on the supreme court. really what that means is there is a leaning towards belief in government getting it right and it is critically important to have the experience of knowing when and how government gets it wrong so that there's a balance of perspective that make

joining me now is maya wiley, former assistant u.s.legal analyst and juania toliver. so people don't think i'm going after merrick garland, this is what he promised to do. this is him one month ago. >> the justice department remains committed to holding all january 6th perpetrators at any level accountable under law whether they were present that day or were otherwise criminally responsible for the assault on our democracy. >> and maya, i guess that depends on what all means and what any level means. right? i mean, that seems to mean all or any level if we take him at his word. >> yeah, and i think what was important about him making that statement is that after he did, we did see seditious conspiracy against the oath keepers. what we don't know is whether or not that is part of a strategy that also might flip folks if there is information that they were having conversations, which i suspect they may have with roger stone and other captains in the army of donald trump, particularly in that war room the day before january 6th. so we don

also with us, maya wiley, a civil rights attorney and a former u.s.and an msnbc legal analyst. jeff, what more can you tell us about the mental that americans can expect from the president tomorrow? >> well, i can tell you, jose, that the speech is being currently rewritten to incorporate what's happening on the ground in ukraine and to also take into account the domestic message that president biden wants to impart to americans, to include just the news this past weekend, his historic choice for the supreme court. the day after president biden will deliver that speech, judge jackson will meet with chuck schumer and so begins the supreme court charm offensive, where judge jackson will have what are known as those courtesy calls. those 35 to 40-minute get-to-know-you selections. where they'll talk about her judicial philosophies. and oftentimes those provide the basis for questions that a nominee is asked during a confirmation hearing. interestingly enough, the judiciary committee, but we do know that democrats are looking at as a precedent the really

maya wiley is a civil rights attorney and legal analyst. with this particular pick, this is a rare moment where a member of the supreme court could be taken to the bench with experience in criminal defense. how does that shape what she might bring to the court? >> let's start by saying that it will demonstrate the diversity that we need to add to the bench. only about 7% of federal judges have that public defender as a background. and it is extremely useful background to have in understanding from all sides the cases that can come before the court that engage in questions of search and seizure. and understand from all the perspectives, the way the criminal justice system is working. she really and very intentionally, we also support it with president biden's remarks about judge jackson. she has experienced it all. even at a personal level. that she's had a family member caught up in the criminal justice system. she has family members who have served as employees in the criminal justice system as police officers. that's a very strong signal

joining me now is maya wiley, former assistant u.s.y and msnbc legal analyst and former detroit police chief who is currently running for congress in michigan. thank you both for being here. tonight the mayor jacob frey announced he's halting no knock warrants saying he'll work with national experts to review and suggestion revisions to the department's policy. want to throw that out there. maya, the reason i wanted to start by reading the fourth amendment, it feels the fourth amendment might be a thing on pipe there sounds really good when i read it on television. i don't understand how we have a fourth amendment if police can do what we saw on that video when a man is asleep on the couch, bust in and shoot him in nine seconds. is the amendment a dead letter at this point? >> it's not a dead letter but constitutional provision that had the supreme court create many, many exceptions to it and depending on your point of view, shooting a lot of holes in it. because essentially, what the supreme court said is well, you know, yes, there is

with a lie on the line, we bring in experts, former sdny civil prosecutor maya wiley and talking points editor josh marshall. welcome to both of you. josh, the tape sells the story. we deal with the evidence around here. i'm curious of what you think of what seems like an escalation. yes, it's familiar, but boy is it pretty pointed with what's come out. >> i think the best way to see this, there's a three-part sort some signs that some . people in the republican party, they're not trying to denounce trump, but they want to move on a little. you see ron desantis down in florida, stuff like that. in response to that, donald trump has been upping the ante recently. it's not enough just not to denounce the insurrection, you've got to be for it. that's what the statement from the rnc a few days ago was about. at the same time you've got a lot of elected republicans who, they don't want to say they're for it because that's still pretty toxic in our political discourse, and then you have the jan 6th community and they keep pushing facts out there which is making that dance between elected repu

. >> joining us is maya wiley, a former chair of new york city civilian complaint review board and nbc news legal analyst, what do you make of this sentencing? >> well, first and foremost let's start with the fact that, yes, this is a tragedy, this is horrible. it's also why prosecutors charged kim potter with second degree manslaughter. in other words they made a choice about whether to indict her and charge her but also what they would indict and charge her for that took into account the facts and circumstances around her killing of daunte and here's the thing, part of why it was manslaughter was because of all the mistakes that she made that led up to his being shot in the first place, from pulling him over on having an air freshener hanging in his -- on his rear view window and having a registration that he had -- license plates he had not -- which everyone said was common during the pandemic, normally wouldn't get someone necessarily pulled over to all the ways in which he had a trainee and handled that trainee so even before you get to the fact thee pulled the gun and not the tas

the former civil prosecutor maya wiley. she knows a lot about how this works, and someone who is known for more than one thing, claire mccaskill, yes, a former senator, but a former prosecutor as well. i want to begin with the humpty dumpty, maya, but you don't always see this in cases. looking at what the judge said because i was poring over the new ruling. they go out of their way to say trump's lawyers submitted, quote, serious substantive and sophisticated legal arguments. that there have been some valid claims made even if they lost. and then the judge says, that makes this humpty dumpty esque claim all the more offensive to the court, that losing your accounting firm means you're actually truthful. what did you think of the humpty dumpty here? >> i have to say that the judge was right because there's just no argument that an accounting firm that has been your accounting firm for over a decade actually says not only are we no longer going to be your accounting firm, we're not even going to finish your current taxes. th

maya wiley, basil smikle, thank you so much. >>> the next hour of "deadline white house" starts aftert break. r of "deadline white house" starts afr tea very short break. who's on it with jardiance? we're 25 million prescriptions strong. we're managing type 2 diabetes... ...and heart risk. we're working up a sweat before coffee. and saying, “no thanks...” ...to a boston cream. jardiance is a once-daily pill that can reduce the risk of cardiovascular death for adults who also have known heart disease. so, it could help save your life from a heart attack or stroke. and jardiance lowers a1c. jardiance can cause serious side effects including... ...dehydration, genital yeast or urinary tract infections, and sudden kidney problems. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal. a rare, but life-threatening bacterial infection in the skin of the perineum could occur. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away... ...if you have symptoms of this bacterial infection, ...ketoacidosis, or an allergic reaction, ...and don't take it if you're on dialysis. taking jardiance with

attorney maya wiley, nbc news correspondent chad brewster joins us from milwaukee and former u.s.gain. joyce, i'll start with you. i'm putting up a graphic here for you and our viewers to see, a map that the supreme court allowed to stand, speaking to -- speak to us a little bit, if you will, about the impact of this ruling on alabama voters, a state you know very well, and how this decision by the supreme court could affect redistricting efforts elsewhere. >> so, let me make it clear that i'm not an expert on redrawing maps based on new census data, but i don't think that you have to be an expert to look at that map and see how oddly it's drawn. the two arms that reach off the body of the one remaining district that gives black voters a chance to elect a representative of their choice, those two arms that fall off of it, they grab birmingham in one claw and montgomery in the other claw, and those are the two majority black cities in alabama, so you can see how easy it would be to have districts that better represented the population. about 25% of the state is black, but this dist

now, capitol hill correspondent alley vitali, also former republican strategist steve shmidt and maya wileye news, it's been a couple bad news for donald trump and family but in this particular case this wasut one he was hopi to have dismissed the idea they could sue him for inciting the insurrection. >> yeah he was hoping to have this dismissed and the judge in this case saying the former president cannot be shielded from the civil suits brought against him for actions he took while still president.k that's a pretty stunning precedent this judgett is now attempting to set by saying this series of cases can go forward so on that front, not the news the former president wanted to get and on the other front, regarding the national archives i'm glad you pointed out the irony of this moment, because i went to hundreds of trump rallies from 2015 to 2016, where continuously, we heard the drumbeat of hillary clinton's emails and now you hear continuous stories about the ways the trump white house mishandled information, potentially tore up documents, stopped them being archived in a way in accorda

maya. and when does that? a sam la la la la la salt wiley, america back on a motel and were and may be of her. shitty can issue my shoe kit this 2nd bid for this the new year. year. my address it. oh my son now. we're good now and it died left here. the hon. this should get this shit, dentist. right. dentist. me it's then i'm better. yeah. that the oh good should he shouldn't, did jam and you had left my should better. julia still ship it. no, no, no, i shouldn't say ah, other palestinian companies were set up to import modern luxury products. 7 but as he was one of the best known, it had branches in several cities and imported electrical appliances, bicycles and a new musical device for playing music at home using disks or records as they were called them about the earth. la harold is grandma for not. danny did she has the smell august, 1 op be and t shirt i la mija tumor bill in p shot ferman took a gamble, told him, and i will cause illness though. what i do a method. hey, it is easy, but daily or the only, but the lab and wellness command, a cornfield and her an email let is they like at the store? not whe