this woke mumbo jumbo by harry and meghan . the jumbo by harry and meghan.means he is literally looking down the barrel , losing means he is literally looking down the barrel, losing his mainstream tv career. and that terrifies me . what it means is terrifies me. what it means is that all of those smaller tv presenters and columnists and journalist all around the world are going to start thinking, oh, you know what? i think about harry and meghan, i might take my friends about it in the whatsapp group, but i've never expressed publicly because expressed that publicly because i might be cancel hypocrite lot of as well. but look, let's of them as well. but look, let's i disagree with jeremy clarkson said i can't defend that but he wasn't it seriously either it wasn't it seriously either it was a joke it was it was in fact didn't actually mean he wanted it making it around the country it making it around the country it was in bad taste but do i want it cancelled now i don't i don't know who they think they are . i think they get in don't know who they think the

, harry and meghan are riding a riding high. and meghan, harry and meghan are riding a riding high .h the woke corporations if you know their popularity continues to decline obviously the book's been a massive seller the netflix interviews were massively so you know that's two wins. but, you know how much longer can they keep this up i mean how much more dirty washing have they got to wash and that they're prepared wash? but isn't they're prepared wash? but isn't the damage done by clarkson thing and i'll explain because look obviously were a brave look obviously you were a brave editor but most editors and most broadcasters most most tv presenters, right . they just presenters, right. they just want to stay in a job and so why now would any of them take the risk of doing either original journalism that criticises harry and meghan in some ways or commentary about harry and meghan when you think that there is a realistic threat that your bosses won't stand by you if harry and meghan complain. yes. and you know, for most editors , and you know, for most editors, the equipment that it i

, harry and meghan are riding a riding high. and meghan, harry and meghan are riding a riding high .h the woke corporations if you know their popularity continues to decline obviously the book's been a massive seller the netflix interviews were massively so you know that's two wins. but, you know how much longer can they keep this up i mean how much more dirty washing have they got to wash and that they're prepared wash? but isn't they're prepared wash? but isn't the damage done by clarkson thing and i'll explain because look obviously were a brave look obviously you were a brave editor but most editors and most broadcasters most most tv presenters, right . they just presenters, right. they just want to stay in a job and so why now would any of them take the risk of doing either original journalism that criticises harry and meghan in some ways or commentary about harry and meghan when you think that there is a realistic threat that your bosses won't stand by you if harry and meghan complain. yes. and you know, for most editors , and you know, for most editors, the equipment that it i

so meghan is meghan joins me.the tide turning against and meghan after what is really think the biggest own goal in publishing history actually when it comes to this book i think the answer to your question is yes and i think the reason is like you like me some others have been paying attention these two very closely , i mean, in two very closely, i mean, in detail for the past couple of years. and if you do that , grow years. and if you do that, grow to dislike them. and now they have insisted that everyone pay close attention to them over the couple of months between her podcast and the netflix docu , podcast and the netflix docu, quote unquote documentary. and this media tour around his book. and they're seeing exactly what you and i have seen. if you if you and i have seen. if you if you just pay attention, you see their pettiness their vindictiveness complete how completely out of touch they are. and you mentioned , the new are. and you mentioned, the new york times. this is by a reporter , the london reporte

prince harry him and meghan.ry says he's open reconciliation with both his and his father, but claims an olive branch has not been extended. well shown? absolutely no willingness to reconcile open to this point . reconcile open to this point. and i'm not sure how honesty is . building bridges of silence only allows the abuser to abuse . right. so i don't know how staying silent is ever going to make things better. that's genuinely what i believe believe . and finally, wales , gareth . and finally, wales, gareth bale has announced retirement from the club and international football at age of 33. bale is the club's most capped player with hundred and 11 appearances over 17 seasons. he he feels incredibly fortunate to have realised his dream of playing the sport he loves . you're up to the sport he loves. you're up to date on tv online and dab radio with gb news. now more from dan wootton tonight. i say let me be straight. prince harry is a liar , but he's one of harry is a liar, but he's one of those liars who has

prince harry him and meghan. harry says he's open reconciliation with both his and his father, but claims an olive branch has not been extended. well shown? absolutely no willingness to reconcile open to this point . reconcile open to this point. and i'm not sure how honesty is . building bridges of silence only allows the abuser to abuse . right. so i don't know how staying silent is ever going to make things better. that's genuinely what i believe believe . and finally, wales , gareth . and finally, wales, gareth bale has announced retirement from the club and international football at age of 33. bale is the club's most capped player with hundred and 11 appearances over 17 seasons. he he feels incredibly fortunate to have realised his dream of playing the sport he loves . you're up to the sport he loves. you're up to date on tv online and dab radio with gb news. now more from dan wootton tonight. i say let me be straight. prince harry is a liar , but he's one of harry is a liar, but he's one of those liars who

meghan.t is out of control. it's on a different level. and it's i'm trying to figure out what the end goal is for destroying going after them for every single thing they say, every move they make . clearly, the move they make. clearly, the world you guys are making it sound like the us doesn't want them. that's not the case. one singular poll by newsweek is not representative of the us as a whole. i also think you have to look at who wrote that story. the guy, the reporter behind that story has done new articles bashing . the meghan and harry, bashing. the meghan and harry, over and over and over again . so over and over and over again. so am i going to believe a poll by someone who is clearly has a bias and is trying to push that bias and is trying to push that bias on the world? no i you know what? like i said what is the end goal? are are you wanting her to disappear or? you wanting her to disappear or? you wanting her to disappear or? you wanting her to end her life? like, what is it? are

this woke mumbo jumbo by harry and meghan . the jumbo by harry and meghan.means he is literally looking down the barrel , losing means he is literally looking down the barrel, losing his mainstream tv career. and that terrifies me . what it means is terrifies me. what it means is that all of those smaller tv presenters and columnists and journalist all around the world are going to start thinking, oh, you know what? i think about harry and meghan, i might take my friends about it in the whatsapp group, but i've never expressed publicly because expressed that publicly because i might be cancel hypocrite lot of as well. but look, let's of them as well. but look, let's i disagree with jeremy clarkson said i can't defend that but he wasn't it seriously either it wasn't it seriously either it was a joke it was it was in fact didn't actually mean he wanted it making it around the country it making it around the country it was in bad taste but do i want it cancelled now i don't i don't know who they think they are . i think they get in don't know who they think the

meghan.t is out of control. it's on a different level. and it's i'm trying to figure out what the end goal is for destroying going after them for every single thing they say, every move they make . clearly, the move they make. clearly, the world you guys are making it sound like the us doesn't want them. that's not the case. one singular poll by newsweek is not representative of the us as a whole. i also think you have to look at who wrote that story. the guy, the reporter behind that story has done new articles bashing . the meghan and harry, bashing. the meghan and harry, over and over and over again . so over and over and over again. so am i going to believe a poll by someone who is clearly has a bias and is trying to push that bias and is trying to push that bias on the world? no i you know what? like i said what is the end goal? are are you wanting her to disappear or? you wanting her to disappear or? you wanting her to disappear or? you wanting her to end her life? like, what is it? are

so meghan is meghan joins me.e tide turning against and meghan after what is really think the biggest own goal in publishing history actually when it comes to this book i think the answer to your question is yes and i think the reason is like you like me some others have been paying attention these two very closely , i mean, in two very closely, i mean, in detail for the past couple of years. and if you do that , grow years. and if you do that, grow to dislike them. and now they have insisted that everyone pay close attention to them over the couple of months between her podcast and the netflix docu , podcast and the netflix docu, quote unquote documentary. and this media tour around his book. and they're seeing exactly what you and i have seen. if you if you and i have seen. if you if you just pay attention, you see their pettiness their vindictiveness complete how completely out of touch they are. and you mentioned , the new are. and you mentioned, the new york times. this is by a reporter , the london reporter,

the story that ran on the papers was that meghan made kate cry, and meghan and harry had really emphasizedat way around. it was the other way around. the palace would not address that because it would be a more negative story for kate to make meghan cry, and that's the sort of thing that really frustrates harry and meghan. but, you know, my experience was, whenever i worked with williams inside of the palace, they were to talk, and often they were working with the sussexes as well, they would me talking about racism and sexism in the british tabloid media. and they weren't trying to stick up for them. i was weak in part in those conversations. and clearly, harry had the inside track, and he felt it was always working against him. >> everyone, stick around. more with my interview with prince harry when we come back. including what happened when he learned his grandmother, queen elizabeth, was near death. >> i lost my brother, i said, what are your plans? how are you and keep getting up there? and then, a couple of hours later, all of the family members in the windsor area we're jumping on a

i think my mother would realize the missed opportunity with meghan being part of the institution andt of the monarchy. and i think she is looking forward to the time when william and i see eye to eye and are joined at the hip again. >> some critics are saying well, you're taking private struggles and you're bringing them boo the public, and you're making money off of them.p>> for me, having y and the institution's part in constantly feeding the british press with lies, mistruths, misinformation, the way i can correct those mistruths is by writing something, the truth in one place without going through the same people that they chose to go through. >> harry reserves much of his frustration for the british press, claiming a member of the royal family refused to set the record straight on false reports, especially about his wife meghan, shifting a negative spotlight on to her in order to protect other royals. >> they pitched the waless, right, of which kate and william are now against the sussexes, me and my wife. they pitched kate and meghan against each other. >> harry says women who

the story got in the papers was that meghan made kate cry. and meghan and harry say it wasn't that way around. it was the other way around. but the palace wouldn't address that because it would be a more negative story for kate to make meghan cry. that is the sort of thing that really us fro really frustrated harry and meghan. when i worked with william's side of the palace, they would often, working with the sussexes as well, they were constantly talking about the racism and sexism in the british tabloid media. they were trying to stick up for them. but i didn't -- i wasn't party to the conversations between behind palace walls. harry had the insidetrack. he felt i was working against him and meghan. >> everyone stick around. more interview prince harry when we come back including what happened when he learned his grandmother queen elizabeth was near death. >> i asked my brother, what are your plans? how you are getting there? and then a couple hours later, you know, all of the family members that live within the windsor and ascot area were

is meghan.us in many respects, yeah. kevin is , many respects, yeah. kevin is, is, is meghan still a pin up for lefties like you ? she was never lefties like you? she was never a pin up for lefties like me. i don't curtsy, bow, scrape took a forelock or . do any of that for forelock or. do any of that for any of them. but remember they , any of them. but remember they, were the fresh new face of the royal family and harry, who was incredibly popular. she came from the states . there was a from the states. there was a glamour around this. she was a woman, colour and all. when disaster wrong. and i suspect they went wrong because she didn't count us snobbery . maybe didn't count us snobbery. maybe some racism. although i know harry has since said there's no racism in the royal family, which probably means a lot to her, but that tries. they accept it in the states for exposing institute. i do that do that you could also could also be incredibly pushy and a ruthless social climber at the same time .

how meghan was label.itish people in this great country, also begin to look at this machine because it is not doing, i don't think so in the country in a good. it from attacks driver said he wanted the royal family to stay because of its continuity. >> max, it is interesting the palace -- privately and offering up people who will say things that they want to be said. i haven't had that, there's been a bit of in the paper. not sure what's coming from. not to say anything here, to allow harry to have it all out. and perhaps to rise above it. i don't really know. i'm a bit more hopeful than the other two, only because things are so bad that it can't getting worse. he's proven the cal middle rule he's really private moments. he's exposed. you, know moments of the phillips funeral. the queen's funeral, you would not talk about this by the family. he feels he has to do that. it is so bad and it will only get better. in the future, coming look at this and say. well, that this all out there now much will try to fi

and mark sincere can tell he's not thanking meghan. i'd like to say that i thanking meghan. say thati do thanking meghan. i'd like to say that i do actually sympathise with some of the stuff that you've been through, but just go away anyway. what's the answer to this stuff? what are we going to this stuff? what are we going to do? how do we return to world where you can apologise ? the where you can apologise? the apology is accepted and we respect and encourage people to apologise. go our kids. you have to grow up in country and culture and if we don't teach them that they're going to get an apology well meant is truthful. what do we do? well, i think the reason apologies even if. meant and know if. well meant and you know clarkson sounds sincere in his apology. says he it apology. he says that he it won't much difference. he's won't make much difference. he's probably lost amazon. amazon probably lost his amazon. amazon but he's going to apologise anyway . and he wrote a personal anyway. and he wrote a personal note to harry on christmas and the sincere the rest of it. he

without himself and meghan.f and meghan , i think that americans were split 50, 50, maybe a couple of months ago when it came to harry and meghan. but the problem is that they can't close mouths and they keep talking. it they just keep talking. and it more petty. i mean, more and more petty. i mean, i was early on this when meghan and harry were still in the royal family and living at frogmore. open frogmore. i wrote an open statement on twitter which if you back that she you go back and look that she was to end up back in the was going to end up back in the united and in los united states and in los angeles, because saw her angeles, because i just saw her coming through d—list coming through the d—list actress she's ever actress and all she's ever wanted do was be invited to wanted to do was be invited to a—list events. she's been a a—list events. and she's been a social from the social climber from the beginning. somebody beginning. she married somebody the socially the first time to socially climb. harry was

is meghan.us in many respects, yeah. kevin is , many respects, yeah. kevin is, is, is meghan still a pin up for lefties like you ? she was never lefties like you? she was never a pin up for lefties like me. i don't curtsy, bow, scrape took a forelock or . do any of that for forelock or. do any of that for any of them. but remember they , any of them. but remember they, were the fresh new face of the royal family and harry, who was incredibly popular. she came from the states . there was a from the states. there was a glamour around this. she was a woman, colour and all. when disaster wrong. and i suspect they went wrong because she didn't count us snobbery . maybe didn't count us snobbery. maybe some racism. although i know harry has since said there's no racism in the royal family, which probably means a lot to her, but that tries. they accept it in the states for exposing institute. i do that do that you could also could also be incredibly pushy and a ruthless social climber at the same time .

the story in the papers, was that meghan made kate cry.and harry are pretty -- saying, it wasn't that way. around it was the other way around. the palace one address. that because it would be -- and that sort of thing that's frustrates harry. but my experience was that whatever i worked with william side of the palace. they would often, work with the success -- the racism, the sexism in the british tabloid media. they were trying to stick up for them. but i didn't, i wasn't part -- behind palace walls. and clearly, harry had the inside track, and he felt they were always working against. time >> everyone stick around, more on me interview with prince harry when we come back including what happened when eli's grandmother queen elizabeth -- >> i asked my brother, how are you and keep getting up. they're in a couple hours later, all of the family members that live within the windsor area, we're jumping on a plane together. a plane with 12 or 14 seats. >> you weren't invited on that plane? >> not invited. -- didn't, i wasn't part -- behind abi

without himself and meghan.f and meghan , i think that americans were split 50, 50, maybe a couple of months ago when it came to harry and meghan. but the problem is that they can't close mouths and they keep talking. it they just keep talking. and it more petty. i mean, more and more petty. i mean, i was early on this when meghan and harry were still in the royal family and living at frogmore. open frogmore. i wrote an open statement on twitter which if you back that she you go back and look that she was to end up back in the was going to end up back in the united and in los united states and in los angeles, because saw her angeles, because i just saw her coming through d—list coming through the d—list actress she's ever actress and all she's ever wanted do was be invited to wanted to do was be invited to a—list events. she's been a a—list events. and she's been a social from the social climber from the beginning. somebody beginning. she married somebody the socially the first time to socially climb. harry was

and mark sincere can tell he's not thanking meghan. i'd like to say that i thanking meghan. say thati do thanking meghan. i'd like to say that i do actually sympathise with some of the stuff that you've been through, but just go away anyway. what's the answer to this stuff? what are we going to this stuff? what are we going to do? how do we return to world where you can apologise ? the where you can apologise? the apology is accepted and we respect and encourage people to apologise. go our kids. you have to grow up in country and culture and if we don't teach them that they're going to get an apology well meant is truthful. what do we do? well, i think the reason apologies even if. meant and know if. well meant and you know clarkson sounds sincere in his apology. says he it apology. he says that he it won't much difference. he's won't make much difference. he's probably lost amazon. amazon probably lost his amazon. amazon but he's going to apologise anyway . and he wrote a personal anyway. and he wrote a personal note to harry on christmas and the sincere the rest of it. he

meghan.whether or not you agree not. they were agree with or not. they were racially meghan racially articles about meghan like straight out of rubbish. rubbish they were not racially an american journalist . yeah, an american journalist. yeah, but that's what's racially charged thanks to white people in common. and black people live in common. and black people live in compton . in common. and black people live in compton. i'm sorry. i'm sick of this. i'm of this. there is no evidence racism against meghan . and you can keep meghan. and you can keep perpetuating this lie that there was not. but there is no racism against white panel. was not. but there is no racism against white panel . well, that against white panel. well, that structural racism and accusations of racism towards the royal family because of the empire and colonial history existed long before meghan and harry commented on commenting on the colour of their baby. i know what referring to, though, is an article that appeared with

i -- >> did meghan never mention they were racist?re were troubling comments -- >> there was concern about his skin color. >> right. wouldn't you describe that as essentially racist? >> i wouldn't, not having lived within that family. >> reporter: harry's revelations vont won many fans here in britain. >> you've got harry and meghan, who are making tens of millions of pounds washing their dirty laundry. >> i don't think you use the word diss your family in a public way as he has done. >> reporter: and yet prince harry insists he is hoping for reconciliation, which still may be a possibility within the family, says cbs royal contributor tina brown. >> the lack of trust is going to be the issue because they can't really believe that everything that these private conversations are not going to wind up in a documentary or an interview or tv interview. >> reporter: the palace is staying silent. prince harry says he doesn't expect his father or brother to read his book, officially leased to h.azon.a, thank noyo topt sporrn >>> thousandsurse

hi, meghan. >> meghan: hey. >> ainsley: what's the first item. >> steve: upscale gift. >> meghan: funnynot just your body weight but lean muscle mass. body water, body fat, and bone mass. so i know you were on a weight loss program in january. >> steve: i was: >> meghan: one of them is a goal tracking scale. goal weight and tell you how you are doing. >> brian: do it with an app. >> you stand on it. and get right on there. and there is two styles. tempered glass and then there is the gold tracking one. >> steve: got to be a couple hundred bucks. >> $21. it is 72% off today. great for your new year weight loss goals. >> ainsley: this is good for the moms. >> meghan: moms love the handheld vacuums. >> my son had a party over the weekend with a bunch of teenagers. i ran downstairs with one of these. handheld vacuum. we charge it, portable charger so it's wireless no cords, right? use it in a car plug it into the light tore charge it up. >> ainsley: this comes down in the seat belt area. >> comes with two attachment, hard to reach crevasses the cheerios. >> steve: we actually run it over th

meghan.whether or not you agree not. they were agree with or not. they were racially meghan racially articles about meghan like straight out of rubbish. rubbish they were not racially an american journalist . yeah, an american journalist. yeah, but that's what's racially charged thanks to white people in common. and black people live in common. and black people live in compton . in common. and black people live in compton. i'm sorry. i'm sick of this. i'm of this. there is no evidence racism against meghan . and you can keep meghan. and you can keep perpetuating this lie that there was not. but there is no racism against white panel. was not. but there is no racism against white panel . well, that against white panel. well, that structural racism and accusations of racism towards the royal family because of the empire and colonial history existed long before meghan and harry commented on commenting on the colour of their baby. i know what referring to, though, is an article that appeared with

harry and meghan . a decision for harry and meghan. for the palace which perhaps caused some controversy. what do you think were the reasons behind that? i think the decision that? well, i think the decision it be just walking royals on it to be just walking royals on that balcony was was the right decision. think it was decision. i think it was reflective of the direction that the monarchy has been moving in and is certainly moving now under the reign of charles. and it was way of neatly sidestepping two particularly difficult issues , the sussexes difficult issues, the sussexes and the rift at the heart of the house of windsor, and of course , prince andrew. i mean, it would have been absolutely awful for to been up on that for andrew to been up on that balcony and would have detracted from the star the show who from the star of the show who was absolute glee, rightly was an absolute glee, rightly so.the was an absolute glee, rightly so. the queen. do you think there was any sense of charles wanting to portray a slimmed down monarchy

before the relationship with meghan. >> you think you were bigoted before the relationship with meghan don't know. put this way. i didn't see what i now see. >> they were married in may 2018 in a ceremony that seemed to promise a more modern and inclusive royal family and given the titles duke and duchess of sussex. but behind the scenes, according to harry, william's mistrust of meghan only worsened. did you ever try to meet with william and kate to try to diffuse the tension? >> yep. >> how did that meeting go? >> not particularly well. >> in early 2019, harry writes the rancor between william and him exploded at harry's cottage on the grounds of kensington palace. your arguments with your brother became physical? >> it was a buildup of frustration i think on his part. it was at a time where he was being told certain things by people within his office, and the same time, he was consuming a lot of the tabloid press, a lot of the stories. and he had a few issues which were based not on reality. and i was defending my wife, and he was coming for my wife. she wasn't there at the time, bu

in a moment, we with meghan.ment, we will have a look at what's happening in the united states of america. you thought our parliament was a circus last yeah parliament was a circus last year. they're trying to rival us in congress as we speak. and of course , the most important course, the most important speech day . but it's been speech of the day. but it's been knocked off the headlines by prince harry. was starmer's speech earlier. well analyse it i'll ask is this the return of the fact of tony blair that lays on gb news from 930. it's camilla tominey for a politics show with personality. then at 11, michael portillo for topical discussion debate . some ethical discussion debate. some ethical dilemmas and sometimes even a sense the ridiculous. and at 1 pm. me i was there. stuart every sunday on gb news is the people's channel. britain's news . channel what? i've expressed my doubts about the veracity of what was said by prince . what do you said by prince. what do you think one viewer says ? it's think one vie

meghan palace investigation was. meghan markle. me any evidence markle.nce that jeremy clarkson has ever bullied anyone . he attacked a bullied anyone. he attacked a colleague and he was sacked. he's made repeated offences. the man is nearly a pensioner and he repeatedly is vile and made a sexual violent speech about meghan markle, which i don't agree with. meghan markle this is an attack on all women . that is an attack on all women. that man should never be given platform. this isn't counselling that much and never have been work. we need to get rid of him because he's dangerous . du pont because he's dangerous. du pont saying this because . but it is saying this because. but it is kind of silly. do you want to see him and jeremy clarkson? an attack on women. he is vile. okay. but can i just clarify ? okay. but can i just clarify? you do want to cancel him? i think he should never have a platform . he so you want to kind platform. he so you want to kind of stay. okay. he was . what do of stay. okay. he was. what do you think that his sexual, violent hat

and another us network ruestions meghan. and another us network questions him _ meghan.ons him on _ meghan. and another us network questions him on how— meghan. and another us network questions him on how his - meghan. and another us network questions him on how his mother| questions him on how his mother would feel. i questions him on how his mother would feel-— would feel. i think she would be sad, i think— would feel. i think she would be sad, i think she _ would feel. i think she would be sad, i think she would _ would feel. i think she would be sad, i think she would be - would feel. i think she would be | sad, i think she would be looking would feel. i think she would be - sad, i think she would be looking at it long—term to know there are certain— it long—term to know there are certain things we need to go through to be able _ certain things we need to go through to be able to heal the relationship. this would — to be able to heal the relationship. this would be familiar territory for diani in many ways. she cooperated on her own book filled with revelations. almo

meghan palace investigation was. meghan markle. me any evidence markle.nce that jeremy clarkson has ever bullied anyone . he attacked a bullied anyone. he attacked a colleague and he was sacked. he's made repeated offences. the man is nearly a pensioner and he repeatedly is vile and made a sexual violent speech about meghan markle, which i don't agree with. meghan markle this is an attack on all women . that is an attack on all women. that man should never be given platform. this isn't counselling that much and never have been work. we need to get rid of him because he's dangerous . du pont because he's dangerous. du pont saying this because . but it is saying this because. but it is kind of silly. do you want to see him and jeremy clarkson? an attack on women. he is vile. okay. but can i just clarify ? okay. but can i just clarify? you do want to cancel him? i think he should never have a platform . he so you want to kind platform. he so you want to kind of stay. okay. he was . what do of stay. okay. he was. what do you think that his sexual, violent hat

in a moment, we with meghan.ment, we will have a look at what's happening in the united states of america. you thought our parliament was a circus last yeah parliament was a circus last year. they're trying to rival us in congress as we speak. and of course , the most important course, the most important speech day . but it's been speech of the day. but it's been knocked off the headlines by prince harry. was starmer's speech earlier. well analyse it i'll ask is this the return of the fact of tony blair that lays on gb news from 930. it's camilla tominey for a politics show with personality. then at 11, michael portillo for topical discussion debate . some ethical discussion debate. some ethical dilemmas and sometimes even a sense the ridiculous. and at 1 pm. me i was there. stuart every sunday on gb news is the people's channel. britain's news . channel what? i've expressed my doubts about the veracity of what was said by prince . what do you said by prince. what do you think one viewer says ? it's think one vie

nfl games, even your local starbucks, meghan. all you really need is that one clip that one moment and there's something about that doll dancing, doing a weird dance and if not even the funniest part of the movie, either. in fact, hashtag megan with the three lone on twitter, millionentionn they're obsessed. what a demented joy to not be disappointed by hype for once i snort, laughed three times and said, i love her at least a dozen she served. she slayed she is mother. and for all of its success as a meme critics can't get enough of megan. either the film scaring up 94% on rotten tomatoes. i think the most important thing, and it's crazy can get this deep about megan is that it doesn't talk down to the people who were there to see it . it's a movie geared towards younger people and talks about younger things. technology, social media all that stuff. and it treats the viewer like they're actually smart. avatar the way of water was still number one in the box office this past weekend, but no one expected there to be any competitio

it's not about harry and meghan, it's not about harry and meghan, it's not about harry and meghan, it'sople that aren't good enough , not good enough, good enough, not good enough, want to do all themselves, you say. which fine if they want to. but if they get it wrong and they haven't got it right, probably blame the people they're employing and, you can see. and also samantha , who? the see. and also samantha, who? the queen at work for the queen. the late queen, the 17 years she gave her to meghan to spend six months or a year with to her her, she couldn't stand it. she so, you know, all that is piling up. so she's miss nice. she really and anybody who falls thatis really and anybody who falls that is actually, you know, not harry did is in a difficult position because i think she bnngs position because i think she brings out the worst in him. so, you know if that's what you you'll get surprise if you want it to be sweet and nice and charming she can be . but she's charming she can be. but she's also got another which is really scary well, let's just say the sussex survivors club . i

harry, harry and meghan.arry, harry and meghan . i can tell you harry and meghan. i can tell you thrilled by so i mean what's what do we make of what test suicide? the front page headunes suicide? the front page headlines today harry wants his dad , his brother back. i mean, dad, his brother back. i mean, the munster outcome. so you can go on to say so with what tassal was saying. i was cringing a bit ihave was saying. i was cringing a bit i have to say, listening to her because she was saying, oh, he he's in pain , you know, and all he's in pain, you know, and all of this i mean, for goodness sake, you know , he's an sake, you know, he's an extremely wealthy young man who's made a decision right. he now says, i, i want a family, not an institution. you are part of an institution and you were brought up to be part of institution. if you don't like it, just simply renounce your it's simple right. just go away . you know, it can can it's happened before logic windsor did but take you know take take the initiati

it's not about harry and meghan, it's not about harry and meghan, it's not about harry and meghan, it'sople that aren't good enough , not good enough, good enough, not good enough, want to do all themselves, you say. which fine if they want to. but if they get it wrong and they haven't got it right, probably blame the people they're employing and, you can see. and also samantha , who? the see. and also samantha, who? the queen at work for the queen. the late queen, the 17 years she gave her to meghan to spend six months or a year with to her her, she couldn't stand it. she so, you know, all that is piling up. so she's miss nice. she really and anybody who falls thatis really and anybody who falls that is actually, you know, not harry did is in a difficult position because i think she bnngs position because i think she brings out the worst in him. so, you know if that's what you you'll get surprise if you want it to be sweet and nice and charming she can be . but she's charming she can be. but she's also got another which is really scary well, let's just say the sussex survivors club . i

so william saying, oh, so you've william saying, oh, meghan , that meghan, she's meghan, that meghan, rude. so harry probably said something about catherine. then we get the catherine. and then we get the fisticuffs. it's so immature . fisticuffs. it's so immature. yeah, it's something you want to heat yeah, it's something you want to hear. just a quick one. do you think despite the fact that you know, this doesn't paint a nice picture of william if we believe everything harry's though everything that harry's though it know, as a bit out of it is, you know, as a bit out of context in the sense does he actually doing that any long harm because he's popular , she harm because he's popular, she seems to be as high as ever. yeah william did not come out of this. well, we know he's hot tempered as his father. this. well, we know he's hot tempered as his father . we saw tempered as his father. we saw that with the leaking pens. didn't a temper didn't they? both got a temper and. clearly, william's temper got the better of him. he doesn't come it well. and doesn't come out of it well. and i

you speak to anyone who knew harry, he was meghan. he was he was with meghan.sually you know. and we've seen this. there's lots proof of it. little bit racy is the p word, that sort of thing. a little bit homophobic , little bit sexist. homophobic, little bit sexist. and actually, you could see it seeping through in parts of the book, even though it was heavily edited. both the ghost—writer and i'm told meghan herself, who made copious quantities of notes. but you could sort see the real harry, see through. and not only is he not compassionate , but he's also not woke . no. in , but he's also not woke. no. in fact , i'm , but he's also not woke. no. in fact, i'm astonished that with his circle of sort of gatekeepers, nobody did edit this , really. i mean, things this, really. i mean, things like the taliban is just an extraordinary thing. and ironically , had he been still ironically, had he been still a of the institution he loathed that. absolutely they would have protected him from making an error. that's that . and error. that's that. and incredibly dangero

you speak to anyone who knew harry, he was meghan. he was he was with meghan.sually you know. and we've seen this. there's lots proof of it. little bit racy is the p word, that sort of thing. a little bit homophobic , little bit sexist. homophobic, little bit sexist. and actually, you could see it seeping through in parts of the book, even though it was heavily edited. both the ghost—writer and i'm told meghan herself, who made copious quantities of notes. but you could sort see the real harry, see through. and not only is he not compassionate , but he's also not woke . no. in , but he's also not woke. no. in fact , i'm , but he's also not woke. no. in fact, i'm astonished that with his circle of sort of gatekeepers, nobody did edit this , really. i mean, things this, really. i mean, things like the taliban is just an extraordinary thing. and ironically , had he been still ironically, had he been still a of the institution he loathed that. absolutely they would have protected him from making an error. that's that . and error. that's that. and incredibly dangero

i think meghan's wonderful i think meghan's wonderful i think meghan's wonderful i think meghan's wonderful through so much, harry and, meghan have been fed to wolves by that family and they have been telling their story secretly , plotting stories secretly, plotting stories against and telling lies against them and telling lies basically , you've told william , basically, you've told william, not defended harry at all. well, that's not quite true. actually, there have been quite a few statements have come out from the have defended both harry and meghan and i've counted about 17 so what do you make of so people what do you make of this i mean , should this i mean, should he be stripped of titles? i mean, stripped of his titles? i mean, i go as far as to even i would go as far as to even strip his birthright title, not call what do call him a prince? but what do you think. yeah, no, that's why i mean, i think do i think we should go that far? i mean, he's embarrassed himself. he's embarrassed himself. he's embarrassed and he's embarrassed his family and he's embarrassing country for multipl

and the problem that meghan did have , even at a human meghan did have, even at a human level, is oneral identity to be assimilated , a buddhist assimilated, a buddhist heritage, which she feels understand. but had she been given enough time . she could given enough time. she could have learned to look after the queen. did go out of her way to make meghan really welcome into the royal family prince william and catherine and many other senior royals, indeed his prince charles. he their charles, now the king. but another way to facilitate the marriage and also to preserve the their transition back into california . so it back into california. so it would be quite unfair him to just get the royal family any negative terms because . both of negative terms because. both of the princes really were very, very people. their targets for the personality traits are very different . but i have seen different. but i have seen a very subtle change in prince harry three or four or five months after they got married. he's not a very different guy from the mischievous fun loving young prince that i do

and meghan, shouldn't make meghan, why shouldn't they make their got bills their money? bills they're from italy they're not spending from italy morally. make morally. not morally. make him money your family. money slugging your own family. well, slagging a well, no, because i'm slagging a country king george country i know king george slagging own children, slagging off her own children, prince or doing prince william, or doing underhand story of underhand. this is a story of betrayal prince oh, absolutely. he runs away . he has been very he runs away. he has been very naughty. the betrayal is from prince william. the betrayal was that harry walked away . he was that harry walked away. he was born to a life of privilege , but born to a life of privilege, but a life of duty as well . he was a life of duty as well. he was and he did. he walked away from hate because he walked away from that. tell why he walked away because it took marriage, a biracial woman for him to realise how racist the institution was. and thought institution was. and he thought , “0, institution was

think that harry and meghan are . i think that they meghan are. have a definitely made the situation difficult . but i also situation difficult. but i also think that the family has to and i think we as the public , we as i think we as the public, we as the press should have a moment, grace to say let them work that out but that simply out. but i think that simply banning is not going to make the family get any. i don't think they're going to be anywhere nice . nice chance to give them a nice. nice chance to give them a chance. nice. nice chance to give them a chance . if you don't want to chance. if you don't want to give them a chance, do that. on the coronation . you can't do the coronation. you can't do that. this is a first coronation since 1953. you can't let you carry the weight again because you will be the number. no, no, no, no . this is king charles. no, no. this is king charles. and this queen camilla's. this is not he's the one who has to put an amazing decision. so unless you think charles will actually give in and he will say, i'll

and meghan, shouldn't make meghan, why shouldn't they make their got bills their money? bills they're from italy they're not spending from italy morally. make morally. not morally. make him money your family. money slugging your own family. well, slagging a well, no, because i'm slagging a country king george country i know king george slagging own children, slagging off her own children, prince or doing prince william, or doing underhand story of underhand. this is a story of betrayal prince oh, absolutely. he runs away . he has been very he runs away. he has been very naughty. the betrayal is from prince william. the betrayal was that harry walked away . he was that harry walked away. he was born to a life of privilege , but born to a life of privilege, but a life of duty as well . he was a life of duty as well. he was and he did. he walked away from hate because he walked away from that. tell why he walked away because it took marriage, a biracial woman for him to realise how racist the institution was. and thought institution was. and he thought , “0, institution was

and the problem that meghan did have , even at a human meghan did have, even at a human level, is oneral identity to be assimilated , a buddhist assimilated, a buddhist heritage, which she feels understand. but had she been given enough time . she could given enough time. she could have learned to look after the queen. did go out of her way to make meghan really welcome into the royal family prince william and catherine and many other senior royals, indeed his prince charles. he their charles, now the king. but another way to facilitate the marriage and also to preserve the their transition back into california . so it back into california. so it would be quite unfair him to just get the royal family any negative terms because . both of negative terms because. both of the princes really were very, very people. their targets for the personality traits are very different . but i have seen different. but i have seen a very subtle change in prince harry three or four or five months after they got married. he's not a very different guy from the mischievous fun loving young prince that i do

think that harry and meghan are . i think that they meghan are. have a definitely made the situation difficult . but i also situation difficult. but i also think that the family has to and i think we as the public , we as i think we as the public, we as the press should have a moment, grace to say let them work that out but that simply out. but i think that simply banning is not going to make the family get any. i don't think they're going to be anywhere nice . nice chance to give them a nice. nice chance to give them a chance. nice. nice chance to give them a chance . if you don't want to chance. if you don't want to give them a chance, do that. on the coronation . you can't do the coronation. you can't do that. this is a first coronation since 1953. you can't let you carry the weight again because you will be the number. no, no, no, no . this is king charles. no, no. this is king charles. and this queen camilla's. this is not he's the one who has to put an amazing decision. so unless you think charles will actually give in and he will say, i'll

i've said that's an meghan.'ve said that's an instant discredit and he's done that on this brilliant show. we've done what he has about. i've not appreciated it . now i i've not appreciated it. now i feel prince harry is doing exactly that because i want to reconcile . he doesn't want he reconcile. he doesn't want he doesn't want to reconcile. i think we've got a problem, which is prince harry has lost the support. amy nicholl told front page. it's over. show he wants to inflict pain and he's the thing. everybody keeps talking about. meghan leading harry straight. that isn't true for me. what's happened is he's picked someone will support him in a plan he's always had. she may have encouraged to do it, but i really do believe a grown man and he's made decisions. when you look at the interviews in the documentary he didn't look like he was having to rehearse or figure out what to say. he's wanting to say this stuff years that he's stuff for years now that he's made bed he'll have lie made his bed he'll have to li

i've said that's an meghan.'ve said that's an instant discredit and he's done that on this brilliant show. we've done what he has about. i've not appreciated it . now i i've not appreciated it. now i feel prince harry is doing exactly that because i want to reconcile . he doesn't want he reconcile. he doesn't want he doesn't want to reconcile. i think we've got a problem, which is prince harry has lost the support. amy nicholl told front page. it's over. show he wants to inflict pain and he's the thing. everybody keeps talking about. meghan leading harry straight. that isn't true for me. what's happened is he's picked someone will support him in a plan he's always had. she may have encouraged to do it, but i really do believe a grown man and he's made decisions. when you look at the interviews in the documentary he didn't look like he was having to rehearse or figure out what to say. he's wanting to say this stuff years that he's stuff for years now that he's made bed he'll have lie made his bed he'll have to li

meghan and perhaps with into. meghan and perhaps with queen camilla , who knows? families by may sixth. i think that's a rather tall order. i mean the first thing is, of course, how prince william and the king have any trust in harry and meghan that they're sincere , first and that they're sincere, first and foremost. and secondly that they won't divulge these private discussions and mediation ehhen discussions and mediation either. in a tv interview or with with with the in book. you can't go off and start on that sort of a basis. can't go off and start on that sort of a basis . and then again, sort of a basis. and then again, when harry and meghan live in an alternative reality where you know, which where black is widen up as down with this completely distorted of the truth as we've seen from the falsehoods and the inaccuracies , the distortions of inaccuracies, the distortions of truth in their book, how can you even begin to actually engage in meaningful discussion with people who don't actually reality in the way that you ? and reality in the way that you? an

the meghan. do you think that's likely to change?— likely to change?royal experts know better - likely to change? the royal experts know better but i likely to change? the royal experts know better but it| experts know better but it doesn't seem like they're offering a lot of support to the sussexes at the moment. and harry is going to i think struggle to get the family to rally around him on this occasion. rally around him on this occasion-— rally around him on this occasion. ., ~ , ., , . occasion. thank you very much forjoining _ occasion. thank you very much forjoining us- _ occasion. thank you very much forjoining us. appreciate - occasion. thank you very much forjoining us. appreciate it. i it's the second day of the australian open in melbourne, and the day that fans of some of tennis's biggest stars have been eagerly awaiting, none more so than fans of novak djokovic who's returning to the competition for the first time since being deported from australia because he wasn't vaccinated against covid—19. our correspondent shaimaa khalil is in melb