>> yes. >> commissioner melgar? >> yes. >> commissioner mccarthy. >> yes. >> commissioner mar. >> yes. >> commissioner lee? >> yes. >> commissioner mccray? >> yes. >> commissioner walker? >> yes. >> and the motion carries and congratulations. >> congratulations. >> and go on to item d, continue to appeal, the orders of abatement. case number 6783, 1450 green street. owner of the record, anne hector. attorney for the appellant, adam clammer, the action reverse the order of abatement and just one moment. >> i just want to clarify, if you are going to hear the two appeals together, i just want to make sure that everyone is clear that that is what is happening. is that your intention then? >> that is fine with me, if we did it that way last month. >> so. >> the department's presentation and the appellant's presentation regards both matters. okay. >> members of the board, good morning, chief housing inspector and i have little to add from last month and the hearing on these two particular appeals and i think that these v

. >> commissioner melgar. >> yes. >> commissioner mccray. >> yes. >> commissioner walker. >> yes. >> that motion carries. >> thank you, commissioners, have a good day. >> thank you. >> we will go to a break and we will go into the abait and come back, if that works, and just trying to be efficient and if that works, okay, we are going to temporarily adjourn the commission meeting and we will have a five minute recess and we will reconvene as the abatement appeals board and department. >> i don't know i mean. >> we're going to item six the discussion are inform the joint building inspection and the potential items are the turn around time from the planning department and the discussion of public housing and this item was from the february 9th meeting. >> thank you, commissioner so the commissioners will update you, you we had originally from commissioner walker who had those with the planning department and how that went so just to update it went very well and there was a lot of discussion we went with an open minded not a clear agenda we're cognizant of the fact we have a lot of issu

. >> the motion and a second considered by melgar and lee. >> we have a motion by commissioner walker and a second by commissioner lee. and i will do a roll call vote and a motion to up hold the order of abatement, and it will hold in abeyance for two weeks and include the assessment of costs. >> go ahead. >> sorry, i have one question and if the property owner does get the work done in the two-week period and the order then will not be issued or in forced but the assessment of cost still would be incurred? >> correct, thank you. >> i just wanted to clarify. >> roll call vote on this motion. >> president clinch. >> yes. >> melgar. >> yes. >> mccarthy. >> yes. >> mar. >> yes. >> commissioner lee. >> yes. >> commissioner mccray. >> no. >> commissioner walker? >> yes. >> a motion carries six to one. >> item e, new appeal and order of abatement, case number 6785, 505, 26th avenue, order of record and appellant, wo ng, banker realty, and owner of record, yick, on wo ng reverse the order of on baitment request 60 days to obtain front door key from tenant. >> the unit which had a notice of v

commissioner melgar. commissioner lee. commissioner mccray. (laughter) commissioner walker. okay 9 motion carries unanimously. >> item f general public comment it there general public comment for any items not on the agenda. is there a second for adjournment >> yes. are we're now adjourned pastadjourned. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ hello and welcome to this presentation. i'm san francisco purrs since that time we've helped people clean up their criminal records. we created this to help you understand how this worked. we'll plan or explain all the steps. after watching this program you'll know what to expect after completing the process. hi, there are i'm deputy and i'm part of the clean slate team. the first thing we will need to know whether your despicable to have our convictions dismissed can't be on parole or currently charged with a crime or serving a sentence and it must be from san francisco. while your colleagues will get to know your circumstances there are 3 steps. getting the clean slate process started it simple you can get them done in the same day. first fill out an application an

commissioner melgar. commissioner lee. commissioner mccray. (laughter) commissioner walker. okay 9 motion carries unanimously. >> item f general public comment it there general public comment for any items not on the agenda. is there a second for adjournment >> yes. are we're now adjourned past >> hi. welcome to san francisco. stay safe and exploring how you can stay in your home safely after an earthquake. let's look at common earthquake myths. >> we are here at the urban center on mission street in san francisco. we have 3 guest today. we have david constructional engineer and bill harvey. i want to talk about urban myths. what do you think about earthquakes, can you tell if they are coming in advance? >> he's sleeping during those earthquakes? >> have you noticed him take any special? >> no. he sleeps right through them. there is no truth that i'm aware of with harvey that dogs are aware of an impending earthquake. >> you hear the myth all the time. suppose the dog helps you get up, is it going to help you do something >> i hear they are aware of small vibrations. but yes

. >> melgar is expected. >> we have a quorum and the next item is two. president's announcements >> good morning and welcome to the commission, congratulations for director huey for last month on the board. we will start again, congratulations to the director for last week's six month follow up with the board's government audit and oversight committee, on last year's civil grand jury report and recommendations the committee agreed with the director that dbi working with gsa, which offered to assist and well managed implementation program and update of the bpr and rather than issuing an rfp for the outside consultant to do this work, once the director has developed his plan and he will brief the commissioner on the details and thanks for the direct for following up on the administration, gsa and implementing immediately the specific policies and procedural changes to insure that any dbi errors are oversight and tied to the 125 incident prevent us again in the future and congratulations to chief, building inspector, for an comments to mctear and ross and t

>> i would also like to acknowledge, commissioner melgar, present. >> thank you. >> on to agenda item five, discussion and information, regarding addressing heat complaints of the department. >> members of the commission we have a couple of handouts, one is a heat, or a notice of heat policies that was established back in november of 2011 that was distributed to the petition and subsequent to that late in 2011. and this was a response to, concerns about the alleged heat violations, and what we could do with the existing process, to, tighten the time frames of compliance, and so we basically shortened those time frames quite considerably and so what i am here to do today, is to report to you what has happened since those policies changed. and so, what i have before you, is the fact that from january first of 2012, through december of 2013, we received 551 alleged heat violations, and of those, 94 percent are closed and the peak violations have been abaited and that is about 36 open cases of 551, and so, now, that means that these cases are getting abaited. and but how are they getting