out alive, she was but you warned it defending key if against russian troops. muslim resistor melissa melissa, we discovered them in a forest. now we immediately began fighting a lot though we were lucky that day because our unit left the battle with only 2 wounded. his muffled me and another lad had wobbled on it. so yeah, boy is sheldon florence who jenko received 2 bullet wounds and the shrapnel wound to his legs. he's one of the 1st ukrainian soldiers to be treated in germany says the russian attack began a low no final to medical care. the patient received and ukraine was excellent, but he needed further operations. so of course, to do that, we needed a large team and the appropriate infrastructure, which is practically nonexistent in ukraine at the moment, minute finally, no actual guns breaking in 6 soldiers are being treated at the louisa hospital in austin. maxim cut of inc. a was shot at by a russian tank into don bus at piece of shrapnel. hit him in the arm. oh yeah, me. oh mina, my media nerve is damaged virginia. should i am still. i can move my hand in this direction but not in

melissa: yeah. brandon: but it's kind of awesome that you're gonna make one that is actually very delicious, too. melissa: yeah. brandon: that's exciting. ooh. melissa: the mooncakes signify sort of the autumn harvest, and the moon is a ry important symbol in chinese culture, so it celebres the moon, basically, and the moon is the biggest and the brightest on this day. brandon: ooh. melissa: i mean, this is the really fun stuff... brandon: kind of crunchy bits. melissa: because there are not that many associations that we have with these things. it's not that hard for us to come up with, like, weird stuff and stuff that we ke and-- brandon: it's not like we're trying to offend anyone. we do want to kind of continue this tradition. we're also trying to figure out how to make things delicious. i think when we're able to kind of find something that culturally discovered, it becomes a little more meaningful... melissa: yeah. brandon: i'd say. melissa: ooh, look at that. ha ha ha! yeah. cool. david: well, san francisco's chinatown is the oldest chinese settlement in the americas. this was downtown san francisco in the 1850s, and the chinese were on sacra

also have melissa melissa naulin, lucy associate curator of decorative art to the white house just across the street. where she has served since 2003 in the presidency of george w. bush. melissa naulin previously held territorial post at washington's mount vernon, the winter ford museum in delaware and the drum museum of new york. she was the master of arts degree from the winter third program in early american culture at the university of delaware as well as a bachelors degree from smith college. last but not least, we have pushed susan p. schoelwer the executive director of historic preservation and collections and the robert h. smith senior curator at george washington's mount vernon. where she directs the architectural preservation, furnishings and interpretation of george and martha washington's home, the surrounding plantations, structures, as well as the landscapes. a ph. d. graduate of yale and an m a graduate from the winterthur program at the university of delaware. she also has a bachelors degree from the university of notre dame. and exhibit that ran from 2016 to 2021, created by dr. susan p. schoelwer and her colleagues, led to the creation of an award-winning ex

oh, fast melissa of defense, melissa brass as well. governed by the generals, the military allocated 25 percent of the parliamentary seems to itself. and if you want to change the constitution to remove the military band, you need more than some 75 percent of the books. you cannot get logging 75 percent of the roads because the military has been 5000 feet. and that includes is the big juice, but still formidable. the mo, greasier the oma in 2010 the military. i how elections. but nobody believed that the military was really going to change. so they went ahead and held the elections. and do you know, surely they won the lens slide and they were in power. and then 10 days later on santucci was relieved. they were allowed her to run in the bi election so that one was home from the prisoner. she is now wonderful and beautiful. we hope that this will be the beginning of the you here, where there will be full emphasis on the rule. all the every apology country, the military was completely shocked that the n o, the party remain extremely popular. as the country started to change within the

the miniature, jose as melissa of defense, melissa brought up as well. governed by the generals, the military allocated 25 percent of the parliamentary scenes to itself. and if you want to change the constitution to remove the military band, you needed more than sam 75 percent of the goals. you cannot get logan 75 percent of the roads because the military has been 5000 feet. and the i elicit big it use, but still formidable democracy in the oma in 2010 the military. i how elections. but nobody believed that the military was really going to change. so they went ahead and held the elections. and do you know, surely they won the lens slide and they were in power. and then 10 days later on santucci was relieved. they were allowed to run in the bi election so that and whoa, whoa, whoa, from prisoner. she is now wonderful. another community, and we hope that the beginning all that you yeah, well the whole emphasis on the rule of the people, the everyday politics of the country. the military was completely shocked that the n o, the party remain extremely popular. as the country started to c

melissa murray. m melissa, i go to you first. everyone has the right to be represented, including with all kinds of arguments at least out of court they could say a lot. but walk us through. did we just hear a legitimate argument from that trump lawyer or is that more of a general, hey, this could be messy, take that for what you will argument. >> it's hard to say. i think she was speaking as a reporter or commentator at that point, not necessarily on behalf of of any particular client, but you're right. under the sixth amendment all individuals who are involved in a criminal investigation or defendants in a criminal investigation or prosecution are entitled to a vigorous defense. the difficulty before the former president is he has a reputation for not paying his lawyers. that make it is very hard to retain counsel. but more importantly, as his legal exposure expands, i think there are a lot of questions among those in the professional community about whether this is a gamble worth taking. we already saw that there were lawyers who advised him to return in the documents that had been kept. ask he resisted. that's difficult as an attorney. if you're representing someone that doesn't want to follow your advice, it can leave you open to professional liability, maybe even criminal liability if your client presses you to take stances that are either ethically or legally problematic. so i think there are just a lot of questions for anyone thinking about representing donald trump at this point. >> before i go to katty, just to finish up on the defense. i mentioned to viewers this came can up earlier in other points in his life. it came up around the mueller probe. there were times people commented on the shear absurdity that someone who was the sitting president, nuclear codes, the power he has to say nothing of a fortune that even if he's kpaj rauted his fortune, there's a lot of evidence he has more money than most people who live in this country. someone in that position was having so much trouble getting one good law firm on the team and it's for the reasons you state. and so i'm cuious. we have spoken to some of his lawyers on the "the beat," so people might remember that. i have spoken to some of his lawyers off the record. so according to that agreement, i cannot convey the substance of what they say under that agreement, although i tried to encourage them to come back on. but i will say as a general matter, there are some lawyers out there working for him and who generally said it's not as bad or as tough as it may seem in public and they attack media coverage. i encourage them to come on for that counterpoint. but what do you say to those who say it's not that fair. sooner or later had he gets the lawyers he needs. >> he does manage to get lawyers that he needs. although i would say in this particular case he needs someone with considerable experience and multiprong federal investigations. that doesn't seem to be the full scope of those who are currently on his legal team and there are a lot of different matters being mand theed. but i think it's worth noting maga is not just make america great again. it's also making attorneys get attorneys. and that has to weigh heavily on anyone who is thinking about representing him. there's also the ancillary reputational costs of being associated with someone who has so much legal jeopardy at this point in time and who also has this other background with inciting an insurrection. there are a lot of costs that have to be weighed. >> that goes to the conflicts between the lawyer and the client. was it not a trump ally kanye west who said i have a lawyer to keep what's in my safe safe. and donald trump has vepted a lot of frustration that they didn't keep the material in his safe. he didn't seem to understand who he was up against. and that brings us not to so much the law, but the shear attitude standoff between trump and merrick garland, someone who trump underestimated. take a listen. >> people are like, well, but let's wait and see a little bit. and this is like the top of the first inning. i mean, remember merrick garland is like a pit viper. he prosecuted the oklahoma city bomber case, the olympic bomber case. and i think these guys are really methodical. >> when trump says or reportedly says about the documents, it's mine, not their, he's exposing some kind of confession. it might be the reason why he's having a problem getting lawyers to defend him at the moment because he has this habit of kind of saying the truth in some weird way. saying exactly what he's thinking. and he's not reckoning against merrick garland who is being methodical. there was frustration. i have heard democrats tell me there was frustration early on in the january 6th investigation hearings that the doj wasn't moving faster. but boy, could things not have moved faster this week. every time i feel that i have dwot mutt hands around donald trump's legal problems, he has yet another one. he's up against really serious opposition when it comes to the department of justice and merrick garland. and he needs an a-class legal team behind him. at the moment, he opportunity have a a-class legal team behind him. for the kinds of problems he's facing and the adverse ri he's up against on multiple fronts. >> that goes to his most visible lawyer in the 2020 efforts, which turned into an attempted coup. do you feel just in the out of court public we're seeing a a kind of different version of rudy? >> i watched that video. we don't know how he got there. i suspect he flew in the end. his first reaction getting out of the car is that kind of slugtly sort of snide chuckle. like this is all kind of a joke almost. and the guy goes in for six hours. with us he had that sort of bravado about him. there's something about the way all of this is happening that points to something within the trump administration, within donald trump and those around him, which is a sort of disdain for government and the organs of government itself. whether it's hanging on to all of those documents, whether it's the process that he went through in georgia. but there's something about -- trump just didn't believe the way that he packed up in the last few chaotic days of the white house. it reminds me of my kid missing a deadline when he meant to pack up from college because he didn't really want to be leaving. and everything got thrown into the dumpster bags. and on trump side, there's this disdain. we know this for the organs of government and for all the instruments of government. and you wonder whether some of that is what is behind the problems that trump now finds himself in and the way that giuliani got out of that surks v today and kind of almost shrugging and laughing at the whole process. they just don't respect the organs of government. that seems to have got them into trouble particularly around these documents at mar-a-lago. >> ewe put that really well. they certainly have sometimes with low odds gotten the out of jams. it's kind of question of whether you keep betting against the house, but what are the long-term odds on that. particular for people not the former president, which we're following. so katty and melissa, thank you. i want to tell everyone what i'm doing next. it's one of our special reports. we work hard on a lot of different projects around here. when we come back after our shortest break, we're going to go through the breakdown of why trump is not only wrong and dangerous in his approach to this search and on going probe, but why the history of the republican party's call for people to just comply and why america's white supremacy is wrapped up in something that needs to change now. when i'm back in one minute. blaz . >>> turning to right now. the rule of law the fbi searched trump's florida home because they said trump was illegally holding top secret property and it violated lawful orders to return it. and a judge agreed. and then as everyone now knows, that search earthed some of that property which he said he was illegally holding and ul legally refusing to provide pack under subpoena. so that's bad for trump. his actions, though, are separate legally from when weather he commi

first, let's go to melissa bell in france . melissayou have been covering these fires across europe now, we learned that eu is on track to see its worst wildfire destruction in more than 15 years. what is the latest on this? >> reporter: well, this is at the very heart, rosemary, of the wildfire that began last tuesday. there have been several reports over the course of july and august here, in southwestern france, where these are parts of europe that have been particularly impacted. this is a fire that's not been officially contained. but that does not mean that it's out. as you said, weather conditions, improving slightly. i'm going to explain to you why this is so dangerous, and why the vigilance of the firefighters, you can see the trucks out here, remaining high. you can see how dry everything is. the fact, also, that there are still leaves here. the flames burned so fast and so suddenly from last tuesday for this particular wildfire that part of the vegetation remains intact. it just spread at a speed that was quite extraordinary

melissa daimler is an expert on corporate culture. she just wrote a book called "reculturing." and i thought i would bring her on to talk about twitter and just sort of corporate culture in general. melissa welcome. if musk is forced to buy twitter, what sort of corporate culture is he going to run into at that company? >> uh, wow. you never know with musk. i can say that i was at twitter in what i would call the glory days. i was there between 2012 and 2016 prior to it even going public. so, at that time i think we were very strong in terms of having a clear strategy and making sure their culture aligned with that. i think musk is a wild card, as we all know, and i hope that if he does end up taking over the company that he keeps a lot of the good foundational components of what twitter has built both strategically and culturally. >> i suppose it would really help us to define what culture is. i've heard it called the things that employees do when the boss is not around. >> yeah, that is not how i define culture. [ laughter ] in fact, it's one of the reasons i wrote the book. i think there's been a lot of definitions out there. culture is a concept that has been around for over 70 years, which i did not realize. but we've had a hard time defining it. i've heard it's the organization's personality, it's what makes people happy, it's what motivates people. and i think that we can design and operationalize culture in a way that gives us all an opportunity to contribute to that. so, i believe that it is three things. it goes beyond values. it's our behaviors, how we work with each other. it's integrating those behaviors into some of those core people processes that we have. so how we interview, how we give feedback. and it's also just our daily practices, you know, how we have meetings, how we connect like this. >> you're still affected by company culture even when you're working at home. >> i think that is the big ah-hah that a lot of people have had in the last couple of years, that we connected and even conflated culture with ping pong tables and donuts and free food and perks. and while all of that is great, i love a good free sandwich, that is not culture. so, while we've been at home these last couple of years, we've still done culture. i think culture is a more active word. i say it's a verb. when we all think about culture and we're all working from home, that's where i think the behaviors and how we work together shows up even more than being in an office. >> so, if you have a good company culture, if somebody shows up who's not a good cultural fit, who goes against the grain of what it is that, you know, maybe your company's been around 20 years, 20 years of this is the way we've done it and we like it this way, that person tends to then move on. you can get rid of a cancerous person, a person who's cancerous to your culture. but what can derail culture? what is company culture -- and i'm talking about a positive company culture here. what is its biggest enemy? >> i think the biggest enemy of culture is relegating it to hr as a one-off initiative and not being able to see it as a strategic lever to help drive your business. >> so, that was good culture. let's talk about bad culture. you were at we work for a while. you seem to understand almost right away, you couldn't fix the corporate culture there. >> yeah. one of the things i talk about in the book is this idea of looking at an organization and culture as a system. so there are so many different parts, as we know. so when we're shifting our strategy, there's an opportunity to also look at our culture and our behaviors. and i think there's been a lot of good stories. there's the hulu docu-series. there are a few movies and books on we work so you can read all the juicy stuff there. but all of it pointed to adam newman as the ceo. and while he definitely had his faults, i think it's more about the cracks in the system. so you not only had adam as the ceo, but you had a very junior leadership team that wasn't diverse, they didn't have a lot of diverse thinking that was brought to the table. >> in your book, you mentioned two of my favorite people. chip created the hotel chain, and patty ran hr at netflix. she invented hr at netflix. what did you learn from them? >> i just have so much respect for both of them. and side note, i think they're both just fun to be around. patty, i interviewed her for the book, i had a pain in my side because i was laughing so much. but netflix, you know, she spearheaded that whole culture deck with what a lot of us are familiar with especially in silicon valley. and i think she inspired me to think beyond values and go to more of that behavioral concept. so netflix, you know, over ten years ago, identified what are those kind of 15 to 20 core behaviors that we expect from everybody in the organization is our playbook. and then embedded those into their hiring process and how they give feedback. i just have a lot of respect. and i think what i also appreciate about patty is she is provocative. she kind of pokes at the typical components that we think about when we think about hr. she believes that hr has a very big role to play and a strategic place at the table. and she did just that at netflix. i think chip is, you know, he was reculturing before i defined it as reculturing. and every company, even what he's doing now, he has this amazing retreat center in baja, mexico. and he continues to not just be a good thought leader, like he was when he ran the hotel chain, but he is always looking at how best to bring people along, how to strengthen a culture. and i appreciated my time with chip. he's always -- i think i ended the book with a question that he often asks people. and he's asked people his entire career, how can i help you do your best work. and i think ultimately that's what we all want. that's what we're trying to strive for when we think about culture. >> well, chip and patty are friends of mine. melissa, thank you for being with us this morning. melissa is currently chief learning officer. in the past she's helped netflix, adobe, amazon, pixar with their organization and culture. well, up next on "press: here," we'll continue our look at life inside the office with a major manufacturer of office furniture. "press: here" will be right back. for years, california's non-gaming tribes have been left in the dust. wealthy tribes with big casinos make billions, while small tribes struggle in poverty. prop 27 is a game changer. 27 taxes and regulates online sports betting to fund permanent solution to homelessness. while helping every tribe in california. so who's attacking prop 27? wealthy casino tribes who want all the money for themselves support small tribes, address homelessness. vote yes on 27. >>> welcome back to "press: here." if you're just joining us, we were talking about company culture just before the break. now i want to bring in jonathan webb, he is an executive at the office

melissa. >> he sort of gets up in the morning, yawns, picks out, "i think i will send myself $17,383." >> narrator: but for years, melissa does not even notice. she has her own issues. >> melissa melissa. would you like to smoke some opium?" >> narrator: and in this family, money is no object. >> there was talk about chartering private jets for their pets. >> narrator: and $90,000 goes to

melissa, and take a short cut to japan. the navy wanted for melissa, particular learning king wanted for melissa. mcarthur of course felt it was incumbent upon the united states to live up to its pledge to redeem his promise to return to the philippines. now, this could have been done through cables. and in the event it finally was, but roosevelt who had been nominated for a fourth term just two weeks before this photograph, wanted to be photographed with his two pacific commanders, as the commander-in-chief deciding the route to victory in the pacific. so it to you, to a certain degree is staged. and mccarthy needed and he didn't want to come. so when he was invited to the congress and says i'm too busy i can't make. it's admiral leahy reworded the invitation of this is a direct order. you welcome and of course he did and there he is. -- >> so let's put ourselves in the room and one of the flowerpots nearby. i can't imagine that lincoln's meeting with mclelland was anything but awkward or insubordinate even. because mcclellan is no doubt telling him the army is not going to fight to enforce that

melissa. let's go over to melissa. >> that was a great question. our requirements for getting crew is two hours. i will tell you that our estimates think we can beat that pretty significantly. we think we're looking at about 80 minutes. i will tell you the capsule you saw in the picture that we showed you does not have any interior, and the trainer we're using to refine those egress procedures with the dod and timing is almost finished. it's going to final stages of verification and validation. as soon as artemis i is over the first test we will embark on with the navy will have that new capsule that has a hatch and seeds in it and we will start refining how quickly we can get to the capsule, open hatch, get the crew out and get into med ban on the shipper estimate is 80 minutes at the center we think we can refine those procedures. >> let's go back in the room. abc news. i think this is for you, rick. if you launch at 8:33 a.m., a 42 day mission. if you launch slips in that window how does a mission duration change and why? >> actually the mission duration doesn't change at all. it will force our team to do a lot of replanning but for the most part the mission is identical. that's at the beautiful thing about allowing for a two-hour launch window, gives us flexibility for the launch teams to successfully launch, and we can still execute the same mission. things, the burns, primary burns may slide on order of minutes but pretty much the mission will be exact, the exact same spot i will add onto that, so the reason, it's at the same duration is every launch a day we are targeting the same point in space for tli, and so when we move through that window we are just changing the angle at which the rocket is approaching that tli and actually the tli is moving westward lee throughout that window. so we're changing the angle at which we are approaching. >> at the risk of being way out of my skis come with relaunch steps. we got the 29th i think the the second and the fifth. i think this is an important point. we are flying this vehicle as a test flight. we do not know everything. we have modeled everything. we defiled it everything and tested everything we can test on the ground but it's a whole different ballgame when you roll to the bad and you go to get off that path. so there's a very solid chance we will, go for the 29th and we don't make the 29th. there's a chance we chance we don't make the second and the fifth and a neck is would roll back, we set a few systems and go back out. the next set we do go to the shorter class 22 i think day mission. so just keep in mind there was a lot of unknowns still out there. >> just clear, the 29th, the second and the fifth are all long class can all be 40+ to emissions. but if we roll back and go into the next launch period then we start off, generally the first part of the launch window which is several weeks as a short class and then we transition to a long class. >> bill harvey, cbs news. i want to follow up on the last ones. we have all been told 29, second and fifth. charlie blackwell thompson said last week or earlier this week if you roll out on the 18th she said get two attempts. [inaudible] >> i don't understand -- [inaudible] when does a 20 day clock starts ticking? [inaudible] >> if i'm standing in my driveway looking -- [inaudible] look at the orientation. [inaudible] what is paul ryan doing? -- what is orion doing? >> we didn't capture the effort tv such as a quick reiteration and then answer. >> the first question bill had was what is the actual constraint on a flight termination system and what is a 20 days charlie blackwell thompson talked about come from? and where does o'clock start. the clock starts during the processing in the vab that that window starts when they install the batteries. they charge them up. that's when the certification period or starts at 20 days, i believe and are not exactly sure the day they're planning to do that but that will be around like the 16th or 17th come something like that. 20 days later the range has told them that the batteries are only certified for 20 days and so i think puts you right after the second console like the third or fourth, right there, not quite to the fifth. so that's where, why she quoted two days because the 20 day certification in the right on the edge of being able to pick up the fifth. i do know that they are in talks with range, the eastern range to try to extend that certification to a little bit longer than 20 days. hopefully to bring in a third attempt but those negotiations are still in works. as far as your second question, rick, you want to take it? >> sure. your reference am standing on earth watching december to what the apollo trajectories looked like in that it is in the earth moon playing. as we fly by the moon and to the outbound how flyby it will be on the backside and we will lose communication and will stay in that and it is doing and make orbit around. when we do that big orbit, the first six days, where going have a loss of, on the order of three hours because the moon is blocking the pathway to the earth. so it is -- they would go in lunar orbit and we will be, just -- [inaudible] >> yeah, , it all depends but jt probably. >> tom with nbc news. take you for a terrific briefing. a couple follow-up jerks you mentioned are two blackout periods on reentry and blackout for comm. countries when it is. shuttle did not have any blackout periods so what has changed. is it the reentry position? is that the? >> y two blackout periods on reentry? the second one is if there were to be a reason to abort a liftoff, any chance at all of aborting to the space station, or is that not possible at all? >> thanks, good questions. as far as the blackout period the orientation of the antenna, that all has to do with why the shuttle didn't have the blackout. originally early on in the shuttle program that were blackout periods until they were able to get antennas on top of the shuttle to look up at the satellites. as far as the double blackout, it is an tenia orientation and there's lots of plasma coming around, you know, i believe the soyuz is the same, same issue. there is a time where this blackout due to the plasma field. as far as your second question,, no, it's not a possibility to abort to the space station, not anywhere near the same orbit. >> okay. so -- polish public television. the question will be for reid. to the astronauts from artemis mission need different training than other astronauts who are assigned for the issa something like that? and how old are they? >> so the way i look at it is right now we have 42 active nasa astronauts here. artemis is an international program and will be flying the colleagues from around earth on this vehicle as we move forward. right now everyone of our astronauts is eligible for an artemis mission. so if you get assigned to a space station mission, you go into space at the space station track if you are signed artemis done when you go into specific artemis training track. while we are not assigned to those missions, i personally what our astronauts to be as well-rounded as possible. even though you may not walk on the moon, studying geology and pangaea helps you when you're on the space station looking down at her earth, looking at the geologic processes you get to see for six months or year when you're looking down. the thing you never get with robotic missions by these eyes and this brain, and we can think up some crazy things and we're left on board. it's crazy what you see how it changes. i say we are all the same as they get assigned a mission and the new going to a specific training track. and for age, we have anywhere from late \20{l1}s{l0}\'20{l1}s{l0} all the way up to mid 60s, and as long as you are healthy there is a tiny bit of medical testing on as as long as you are healthy then were going to load two and a rocket and shoot you off the planet. and we walk on the moon. and then on to mars. >> good morning. jeff with space news. artemis i is flying the orbit which is not an orbiter planning to use for future artemis missions. when you talk about the benefits and trade-offs flying vro versus halo that you'll be using for artemis iii and beyond? and also the difference between short and long class missions, either mission objectives that you would be able to achieve in the long class mission that you would not be able to achieve with a short class mission because of less time? >> i am very focused on artemis i missions i don't have a lot of knowledge about the other artemis missions but i think the knowledge we will gain from getting to the moon and getting back, how we're going to build trajectories and burn plans to do that, and that's exactly what we're going to use once we get to the moon in order to get into these specific orbits around the moon. artemis i albeit it's a different as you alluded to, we'll still gain all the notes row this vehicle is going to operate as far as the burn plans and targeting these special burns that put us in the different orbits once we get to the moon. for your second question regarding the difference between the short class and long class, actually we will be able to accompany all of our mission objectives on a short class mission. they will be closer together but we will be able to accomplish all of them even on a 26-28 day mission. the challenges where to deal with is with thermal constraints where they can go out of attitude to do some of these activities but once you go out of attitude of your limited to three hours and then want to come back into attitude you have two tailed assigned for ten hours to get the thermal recovery before you go up into another one. so to plan all these activities, these events to ensure we can meet all the objectives it's a very tightly choreographed timeline to ensure we meet all the thermal constraints. we built a timeline for the short class mission and we can meet all our objectives. >> because of the moon earth gravity interaction with the orbit we can state and a stable, takes very little -- to stay in orbit. that's an advantage, we can get along mission, bring up the systems with a short class a long class it would be quite a lot longer than the first crewed flight which is targeted 10-12 days or something like this. we are getting this long orbit when we can bring of the systems. >> and looking forward for artemis ii and beyond, the advantage of that orbit is that it's always facing the earth. so you have something is always facing the earth and it will allow several different types of vehicle whether it be orion or the lander to rendezvous with the gateway and then go to the moon surface. [inaudible] >> dan shafer in huntsville. this is a follow-up for reid. you called 40 astronauts down to about ten want to fly on these first couple of crewed missions. how did you do that? >> we have deathly not done that. we have 40 to active astronauts and earlier this year some of you folks were here, we announced our latest class of asked the candidates with ten americans from across our country all walks of life to join our core and there in their initial training right now. when you graduate in about 18 months then they will come in to the 42 42 active astronauts h us. right now we have not made any flight assignments. we have not gotten down who is going to do what missions at this point in time. we want to watch artemis i and there we want to make the right smart decision when we assigned to make and eventually three and beyond. >> thank you so much, rose roseanne. thank you so much for taking time for us. two questions. the first is for reid. we know the apollo generation is watching this been so much today. today. what is your message to those who worked on the apollo program and how their expertise contributed to what you're working on today? >> what i i would say to thems thank you. that apollo generation land achievement on the moon at a time were truly look back and think it was impossible. and then that technology, barry johnson space center we we're sitting at now is a legacy of the apollo era. i don't think about that when i think about apollo. when i think about apollo i think about every kid i watched that landing and wanted to work in mission control the wanted to be an astronaut that want to be a doctor that wanted to be a schoolteacher, like the effect of what apollo did was not putting the alarms on buzz armstrong. it was -- there is nothing that motivates someone more than doing, that is what apollo did and that is what artemis is going to do. we are going out there and we're going to do this, and that way you really energize everyone. >> my second question is more of a technical question. i see a lot of big mission objectives here testing, the guidance and navigation control, seeing how the orbital maneuvering system does, , makig sure you nail the return power flyby. what is your margin of error especially considering some of these things have never been done to this capacity at all, what is your margin of error and what does success look like if not all of your objectives is met? >> -- ? the margin of error is small but those trajectory correction maneuvers on talking about, they are going to ensure when we fly by the moon were at the right altitude and we don't run into it, and i talked about the burns. burns. we assign a criticality to them. a noncritical burn is one if we didn't execute, no harm, no foul. we can pick it up, make it up later. then we have mandatory burns where if you don't execute that burn then you lose a mission objective. a good example be the outbound power flyby. if we didn't do that and we would be able to get to do the dro mission get we will save the bring orion back but we won't be able to college all our mission objectives. the last category is the critical burn. that's the return power flyby and that's what if we don't execute it and it's a loss of the vehicle. so the margin of error is small but we have opportunity to make sure that we correct, make all the right corrections to make sure we target our flybys. so confident we will be able to execute the trajectories as necessary as long as a vehicle performed the way it is designed, we are going to get the mission accomplished. >> i would add to that this is a test flight. we we're also finding where the margins are, right, finding where the conservatism in the analysis that we have previously done. so in many respects we are continuing to learn. so we will find where those margins are. >> i'm cooper. apollo had the camera on the moon and an curious to know does artemis have a camera? >> action artemis has a lot of cameras. debbie probably can talk better about the interim ones but on each wing we had a go pro that is wires come has a wireless link to the crew module and will be taking imagery a lot throughout the entire mission and will be transferring the imagery on the go pro camera down to come with camera controls and they will be bringing those down to the earth. earth. there's internal cameras also, i don't know the make up of those. >> i don't know the make. there are several cameras inside the crew module and actually does a technology demonstration payload, you can read about if you haven't already. it's a collaboration with alexa and actions so you'll have i came on board, you will be seen from the vantage point of the crewmen were sitting in a seat and purchase this can interact with that if you have a like set on you can ask questions, where is artemis today, where is orion today? there are cameras both externally so things performed away what are did that lock into place? definitely helping the nation if we start seeing david a looks like an anomaly but then a whole bunch video inside as well for just see what's going on. [inaudible] >> good question. i wouldn't be able to give the answer day. i'm sure gary can teach information what's happening on that. >> danielle from the and the. people ask questions about members and the want to talk about the human aspect this is the very first time that we see an african-american, a woman going to the moon. columbia being the flight director, astronauts from ecuador, from salvador, from puerto rico. how important was for nasa to send that message out there, that this was like driving into diversity and inclusion, all of you guys? >> absolutely a priority. it's something we think about every day. this nation professionally i'm very excited and proud but also personally, i have three kids, two dollars and when i talk to them about we're going to send a woman to the moon, like there hasn't been one? they go up and in the private what things are so much more diverse and inclusive. so absolutely to me from a professional but also from a very personal standpoint i think it is a huge, huge deal that we've made this a very big focus of this mission for both women and people of color. >> absolutely. our job at nasa is to do the things that are difficult and to do the things that are right and to motivate our base, which is our youth and right now our country is a diverse and extremely rich country and we want our astronaut corps to look, we want every kid in america to look at our poster and say oh, i see myself in that. i grew up poor, or i grew up in this state, or i grew up with this type of family. i can do that someday. and it's really important for all of us to stand together as we go into this. the neatest part about getting to work at johnson space center is a team you get to work with everyday you get to work the stories you can tell, the flight director class we decide that is truly from all over our country and the world, it is amazingly rich place to work. it's reflected every year. it's the best government agency to work in and there's a reason for that because where progressive and we love what we do. >> i'm going to go into the phone for a second or they have been very patient someone to give them an opportunity as well. margaret marshall with a nighttime news, go ahead. >> caller: my name is -- appreciative guys having a sadr today. my question kind of is on the camera question, i was one how much public engagement will be for live streaming for orbit, pictures are worth 1000 words but they do us a much more. will it be an emphasis on providing the public with live streams after the launch live stream on orbit, the initial live stream and like artemis i or even artemis ii? thank you for taking our question. >> i'll try to answer that. if i heard correctly and if i didn't you can ask again when i finished but yes threat the mission will be having live stream imagery coming down but it's in competition with all the data we need to get down as well. we are limited on her data range that will be transmitting information down from orion throughout the mission. there's times will we go to a high resume what we can do imagery and then also maintain our telemetry. but for a lot of these events will also be recording the high resolution imagery and then those would be downlink after the event. we have a priority list of how we're going to bring files off of orion. it's going to take a matter time because there's a lot of dated we will be bringing down on a continuous basis. it will be somewhat after the event to get the real high-res but the intent is that some streaming imagery during these events as well. >> let's go to melissal quick. she wants to add a little bit about what happens at the recovery stage for imagery. go ahead. >> we have about 17 cameras all over the ship in helicopters, an open water. several of those are connected to basically a satellite system with onboard that we will be able to stream near real-time live video back to johnson to be sent over nasa tv. you will be able to see recovery operations real-time. >> very good. let's also go to the phone, last one on the phone. associated press. >> yes, for reid us hoping you could provide details on what special traits or skills you are looking for for the first two crews, and will the first two crews come from the 18 artemis team astronauts announced the company back? today using the indicating any of the 40 to active astronauts could be in the running at this point for artemis ii and three. thanks so much. >> you bet. i'll start with the second half, which is the way i look at any one of our 42 active astronauts is eligible for artemis missi

host: melissa in chicago, what do you feel about it? melissa in chicago? good morning to you.uest: -- caller: yes, high. thanks for taking my call. i think this is ridiculous. ukraine is a very corrupt country, and it belongs to russia. dragging us into this -- i think china is just laughing. the u.s. dollar will be worth $.30 in the next couple of years, and they are going to be knocking for their money. they are going to take over. the dollar is no longer going to be the universal commerce anymore. it is not going to be the dollar. that is all i have to say. i think biden is the worst, the very worst, we have had. he is going to take this country down. host: vanessa in princeton junction, new jersey. caller: i want to remind all of you that this so-called war, american dreams came true. biden said he wanted ignorant and stupid men. thinking that russia can succumb to their own dreams, that is not going to happen. ukraine is the most corrupted country. it is part of russian history. america will continue giving -- initiated although continued, giving my -- all the continued,

melissa lee joe and becky and andrew are out today. melissa, good to quote see you >> i know. it's been a while, brian this will be a fun three hours ahead. >> either that or destroy our careers in an instant. one of two things will happen. >> yeah. >> we can choose >> it's in our power >> i do miss you, melissa. it's been 22 years >> yeah. tv brother and sister, i think the best analogy. >> peter and jan or greg and marsha let's get to t

melissa, i bet in this case, the stakes are so high that everyone is happy to have that assessment. harry and melissaso much. next, warfare on reproductive rights playing out in yet another state. this time, and nebraska. we're gonna speak to someone working to help people get the care they need, no matter what. later, what the cdc is saying about covid and schools with kids getting back to classes across this country. ask for advice? stick with us. stick with us. taken with a statin, leqvio can lower bad cholesterol and keep it low with two doses a year. side effects were injection site reaction, joint pain, urinary tract infection, diarrhea, chest cold, pain in legs or arms, and shortness of breath. with leqvio, lowering cholesterol becomes just one more thing life throws your way. ask your doctor about leqvio. lower. longer. leqvio. >> two states, given the okay to further restrict reproductive rights. this week, judges and both idaho and louisiana, allowing near total abortion bans to take effect. in idaho, and you'll also lets people sue abortion providers, if a pregnancy in their family's termi

melissa bell live with the story this morning. good morning, melissa. >> reporter: good morning, john. this was a video published, made public much to the regret of the finnish prime minister who said they were filmed in private, the intention was that they would remain public. this was a private public in which she danced boisterously but there was nothing else anyone else should have worried about. when it first became public a great deal of outrage, criticism, so much so that sanna marin went and took a drug test that we will get the result of next week insisting she had never taken drugs in her life. this was her response on friday. >> i didn't have any work meetings planned for that weekend, they are confirmed usually beforehand and i didn't have any meetings, for example, saturday or sunday. i had work meetings on monday, but i of course handled -- we didn't have any government meetings during that weekend. i had time off and spent it with my friends and did nothing illegal. >> but after that criticism and that defense and the drugs test a great deal of support as you say from women all around the world posting pictures of themselves, videos of themselves, doctors, lawyers, all kinds of professionals saying the message even though they are women and professionals the idea that they should be dancing in their living room or in a nightclub or at a party shouldn't present any problem to anyone. that is very much the finnish prime minister's defense, i'm going to keep doing what i do which is what a normal 36-year-old woman would to enjoy time off for themselves. the prime minister retains the support of her party as well. >> melissa these countries learned anything from kevin bacon? what's wrong with dancing. >> i have a strong opinion on this. i think it's ridiculous, the criticism. she's 36 years old, it's not a criticism of her doing anything in her job, she's is having to defend herself and say there weren't any meetings and she was not doing any illegal. are people not allowed to have a work/life balance. >> if kevin bacon has taught me anything it's dancing can be therapeutic. >> are you a good dancer? >> i happen to be a good dancer. that's not an invitation to publish any video of it. it's an unfair criticism. >> in all seriousness i don't think a man who was doing that would get the same criticism and i also think if you look at scandals happening here in the united states and other places it seems like such a small issue. >> as far as joe biden is concerned as long as they are dancing in the nate in nato he's happy. >>> an update on russia's investigation into a car bombing that killed a prominent putin

melissa borja is an assistant professor in american culture and core faculty member in the asian pacific islander american studies program at the university of michigan. melissa works on religion migration race, ethnicity and politics in the united states and the pacific world her book follow the new way among refugee resettlement policy and hmong religious change is forthcoming from harvard university, press melissa an active public scholar serving a senior advisor to the religion and resettlement project at princeton university and this lead investigator of the virulent hate project. which studies auntie asian racism and asian american activism during the covid-19 pandemic. her paper today is religious body politics religious pluralism and regulation in healthcare settings. and finally william schultz is a historian of american religion and assistant professor at the university of chicago divinity school will works on the intersection of religion politics and capitalism, and it's currently finishing up his first book jesus in the rockies how colorado springs became the capital of american evangelicalism, which explains how the confluence of evangelical christianity and free-market capitalism transformed the city of colorado springs into an epicenter of american conservatism. his next project is the wages of sin faith fraud and religious freedom in modern america, and he's speaking today out of t

melissa bell is joining us with all the latest developments from the ukrainian capital. so melissaing they have already taken back four villages from russian forces. what more can you tell us? >> this is also a counteroffensive acknowledged by moscow, speaking of the fact it was failing miserably, but acknowledging it was happening. also, a counteroffensive that has been anticipating. the ukrainian military has been preparing for it for weeks, with strikes on ammunition depots and the bridges that allow forces to cross the denip row river. the town on the other side of the river has been knocked out by shelling. that gives you an idea of what ukrainians are trying to achieve, trying to recapture the only regional capital that has been captured and remains in russian hands. a lot of attention on the zaporizhzhia power plant and the visit the is supposed to take place later this week by the iaea. for many, it's a nightmare scenario. shells landing just miles from europe's largest nuclear plant. zaporizhzhia's become a flash point in the war in ukraine, with both sides blaming the oth

host: melissa in chicago, what do you feel about it? melissa in chicago?aller: yes, thank you for taking my call. i think this is ridiculous. ukraine is a very corrupt country and it belongs to russia. dragging us into this -- i think china is just laughing. the u.s. dollar will be worth $.30 the next couple of years and they are going to be knocking for their money. they are going to take over. the dollar is no longer going to be the universal commerce anymore. it is not going to be the dollar. that is all i have to say. i think biden is the worst, the very worst, we have had. he is going to take this country down. host: vanessa in princeton junction, new jersey. caller: i want to remind all of you that this so-called war, american dreams came true. biden said he wanted ignorant and stupid men. thinking that russia can succumb to their own dreams, that is not going to happen. ukraine is the most corrupted country. it is part of russian history. america will continue giving money but the american people should ask themselves, does that money really go to u

melissa lee joe and becky and andrew are out today. melissa, good to quote see you >> i know. it's been a while, brian this will be a fun three hours ahead. >> either that or destroy our careers in an instant. one of two things will happen. >> yeah. >> we can choose >> it's in our power >> i do miss you, melissa. it's been 22 years >> yeah. tv brother and sister, i think the best analogy. >> peter and jan or greg and marsha let's get to the channel and fast money dow futures are looking fine on this friday morning. up 170 points. incredible rally, melissa. knocking the bears out of the way as the bulls come in oddly, bonds continue to get bought 10-year treasury remaining at the 2.8% mark. bond market and stock market are in different directions. we will add fast money with carter braxton coming up, melissa. we will ask him about the bond market and stock market. we will do segments about gasoline under $4 a gallon nationwide enjoy it i think it will be above that today because the price of oil is $94.50. oil gained $6 a barrel in three sessions >>> among the top corporate stories we are watching is rivian a smaller than expected loss better than forecast revenues in the latest quarter investors are focusing on guidance trimming the financeial outlook. investors should expect a wider loss riv

melissa i don't really have an answer for you. but right now we're looking at bitcoin down about $21,540 >> maybe it's just risk off across the board, across assets today. we'll see. >> we'll see thank you, melissa you next week >>> have a great weekend, everybody, hope you join us on monday "squawk on the street" begins right now. >>> good friday morning, welcome to "squawk on the street." i'm carl quinn an -- la with mike santoli and dave faber. investors consider whether this bear market rally has run its course for now dollar is headed for the best weekly rally since june. bed bath shares plunging after it was confirmed investor ryan

melissa bell, thanks very much. >>> and let's turn now to cnn's fred pleitgen who is live for us in moscow. fred, you were hearing from melissa there reports that the counteroffensive has got under way. russia have already been responding. what are they saying? >> reporter: ukrainians said that they had taken four towns on the ground but russians claim that the offensive as they put it as so far failed miserably, but it also did take the russians a long time to acknowledge that there was a counter offensive going on. so the russians at least acknowledging now that there is heavy fighting going on, that this is a counteroffensive by the ukrainians. one of the other things that the russians have said, that overnight there was pretty heavy shelling going on in a town that is in that general area, a pretty long frontline actually if you look at the counteroffensive where the ukrainians are trying to make head way. again right now the russians say that they are holding on but they acknowledge the heavy firing going on from the ukrainians as well. it was quite interesting because there was a local russian installed official in the kherson area earlier today who said that no one was threatening the town of kherson and that the russians are well dug in. of course whether or not that is the case is impossible to independently verify. but the russians do acknowledge that right now there are heavy battles going on, but so far they have not acknowledged that they have lost any sort of territory or that they are having any sort of problems resupplying ting troops on the ground. but we have seen that the ukrainians continue to hit a lot of the bridges making it very difficult for the russians to keep their logistics upright. >> and just turning to zaporizhzhia, we know that obviously russia agreed for the iaea to visit or it wouldn't be happening. what else are they saying about the impending visit? >> reporter: well, the russians claim that the ukrainians continue to shell that area where ukrainians keep saying it is the russians and that this is all a provocation. one of the things that happened overnight or in the early morning hours of today is that the russians claim that there was a building in the vicinity that has spent nuclear fuel in it that apparently close to there may have been some hits. it was a statement of put out by the energy provider saying that there were two ruptures in the area near a building that has stored nuclear fuel in it. unclear whether or not that means explosions or whether there was any sort of more serious damage that was done. but it is something that we've been hearing from the russians really over the past week increasingly as this iaea mission draws closer, they claim that the ukrainians are trying to disrupt the mission. obviously ukrainians are denying that and of course the mission itself right now is in kyiv and as melissa said, there will be a press conference by them today. the russians did say that they will provide for safety for that mission, however they also say of course that they can only do that in the areas that they control. >> fred pleitgen in moscow, appreciate your reporting. thank you. >>> russia could soon have new military hardware on the battlefield in ukraine. u.s. officials tell cnn that they believe moscow has acquired weapons capaable drones from iran. many believe that the dreens have technical problems when the russians were testing them. >>> today marks one year since the u.s. withdrew from afghanistan. and the last american troops departed the country. in the days leading up t chaos as afghans attempted to flee the country and the taliban. the u.s. says that it was able to move about 124,000 people to safety. clarissa ward will have more on "early start" in the next hour. >>> and we're keeping a close eye on the situation in baghdad where at least ten people have been killed i

melissa bell kicking off the team from the international atomic agency has arrived ahead of the planned visit to the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. melissa. >> reporter: brianna, that's right, we're just outside the hotel where a press conference had been due by this inspection team. their vehicles are parked outside. we have not shown them. that's been cancelled. we are hoping to get more details on when exactly this team hopes to get to zaporizhzhia to carry out that inspection after so many day of shelling around the plant and counterclaims about what damage may or may not have been done. so we're keeping an eye on that. but it is also the real story from ukraine this morning, that counteroffensive that has brought so much hope to ukrainians. this morning, we're hearing from regional commanders that day two has seen regional fighting along that front line. there is a great deal of hope, as i say, that this will manage to make some progress. we're hearing again from ukraine cran authorities that all of the crossing points, across the dnipro river that has now been destroyed and it is that fight on the infrastructure for which they have been so useful. those longer range high mobility artillery rocket systems have hemmed the ukrainians over the course of the last couple of weeks, really set the stage for this, prepared the ground for this long-awaited offensive. we're hearing a great deal of determination as well in the voice of president zelenskyy who spoke in his nightly address last night with the need to push the russians back to the border and suggesting this was going to happen and yet words of caution or patience from a senior presidential adviser this morning saying, look, this is going to be a long grind. and ukrainians need to be patient. even as i say, the early successes, the physical villages taken yesterday have led to a great deal of hope, brianna. >> melissaell in baghdad, thank you. >> joining us, reena ninan, a veteran affairs correspondent. i want to talk about the counteroffensive which they say has more or less begun. it's centered around kherson. why is that city so important? first town taken by the russians. they want to push the russians back to their borders, meaning this area right here, crimea. what you're seeing the military strategy is to create the land bridge from kherson to crime mc. john, we don't know they wanted to push for a offense, but we don't know with the fog of war who is telling the story or who is true. >> and the towns here in kherson and the town up here, we've been seeing counteroffensive operations for months and months. the question is, what's different about this? >> what's different about this, we've seen the himars military system giving them a tactic along advantage. that has helped significantly, we've heard in many instances. if you also look down here, the black sea, kherson is so important as far

melissa well, incredibly important reporting tonight. >>> general mark hertling, thanks very much for being here. let's start with the counteroffensive in the south. is this the momentum, as melissa reported, that may be needed to turn the page? could this be a crucial turning point for ukraine? >> it's the potential start of it, poppy. i'm not going to call it a counteroffensive yet. i've said for a couple of weeks that we should expect small-scale counterattacks, drib rat attacks on the part of ukrainians. and they are doing that. they are doing a good job in terms of liberating several cities. but when we think counteroffensive, many people think that there's a large front line and ukrainians are attacking along the entire frontage of a very large area, couple hundred meters. that's not what's happening. they are attacking relatively small areas, but they're achieving some success. and it could give an indicator of a potential for changing the momentum of the war. >> okay. so, wait and see on that front. but what about melissa'sing up for iodine pills, huge concerns about a nuclear accident. the ukrainian foreign minister warning russian attacks near the plant are putting the entire continent at risk. we heard national security council spokesman john kirby saying the u.s. is, quote, deeply concerned about the situation. how dangerous is it right now? >> we should all be deeply concerned because it is dangerous. if something were to happen at that plant that would release radiation in any form, it would hurt the surrounding areas. it could certainly affect areas beyond just that small area where the plant is. but truthfully, again, this is russia conducting criminal activities in combat. this is a war crime. and the people in the area certainly should take precautions, as they are doing. and the iaea should have someone on the ground soon. but it seems like russia continues to stand in the way. and that's extremely troubling. >> sounds like the iaea will get in there on friday, hopefully if all goes as planned

melissa repko is back with the story on all three names today and we have our trades, managing director at bk asset management and cnbc contributor. welcome to both of you melissa, let's start with target and some pretty high expectations now >> yes investors will expect a proper support on target inventory kind of like we heard today from walmart. target cut its profit outlook, so investors want to hear is it selling through that with markdowns and will it be in a better position back to school and the holiday season target toends have a slightly higher income consumer than walmart which may help inflate it on the other hand it sells a lot more discretionary merchandise like apparel and electronics that could make it more vulnerable as people spend more on groceries and essentials. >> what do you do, buy the stock here you like it? >> i think it is rallying into the earnings and could be ripe for a very minimum survey in line surprise. they've been warning consistently because i think they are really trying to manage their inventory. their weakness in many ways is their strength, the fact they are so strong in discretionary they are really outstanding, their shopping experience far superior to walmart. walmart, you saw its earnings really coming from all those areas. i don't think target is anywhere near there they are trying to struggle there with the inventory at this point. it may be another quarter before they stabilize the shift to me stock rallying into the earnings, really have to go to the upside hard for the stock to go further we could have a sell-off that having been said, on a long-term basis great company and stocks so any sharp dip here could be a good opportunity to buy. >> that was our little tease you've answered it in terms of trading target to lowe's now a similar story, already up into the report why? because home depot posted a strong beat this morning but lowe's only gets about one-quarter of the business from the pro segment while it is about half for home depot. you think that will be a head wind >> that is definitely a different dynamic between the two companies. on the one hand we heard today from home depot that people are still willing to spend on home improvement projects which is something going strong quarter after quarter. but with lowe's it does rely much more heavily on the do it yourself consumer and that kind of customer may skip the landscaping project or repairing the sink as they are able to travel again, dine out again and decide to relax as they enjoy the summer time. lowe's has been trying to grow its home professional business and will be interesting to hear if it is having success to make the business a little more stable if do it yourself customers decide to take a quarter or two off >> boris, i think it is all pros because no one else can navigate the store. you should see me. i go in there and i pull out my phone and look up the item and say here is where i am where in the store is it i try to follow, okay. aisle a-38 whatever it is. >> the trick is to always corral a sales person and have them walk you to it that is the only way but lowe's is actually supposed to miss both sequentially and in a year-to-year basis and that is probably right especially everybody of course talks about the pro versus dui that is true that only 25% is pro. if you look at the sub components like sherwin williams, miracle grow, all of the suppliers to lowe's they all have it lower. that to me could be a sign that the stock is going to miss as far as expectationings go. to me, right now, relatively wary of the stock. kind of up now over enthusiasm over home depot and it could be misplaced. i would stay away at this point. >> what are your thoughts about home depot itself given some of the headwinds you mentioned? >> yeah. you know, housing clearly is starting to slow down. for the first time you are able to get a contractor to pay attention to you the big, cyclical winds are definitely having an impact. that having been said there is still a tremendous amount of consumer demand going forward. both of the companies are actually on a long term basis but the next couple quarters especially with so much housing supply coming on board and slowdown in projects could have a weighty impact >> i will report back when we have a glut of people vying for that business. finally, let's turn our attention to tjx today the parent company of tj max and home goods down about 12% this year which makes it the relative out performer this group but will they guide down i guess that is one of the big questions. >> two of its categories, the home category and the apparel category have been showing some signs of softness and also a lot of markdowns at target and walmart and a lot of other places so is it able to keep the sales going even as demand shows signs of pulling back? on the other hand it could benefit from the excess inventory we're hearing about because it may have an abundance of high quality merchandise in the coming months and could also benefit from a more value mindedness of consumers as they go into back-to-school and the holiday season which is when a lot of people are looking for gifts and perhaps looking for new outfits, too. >> boris, a perennial out performer last decade. more of a troubled stock lately. what do you do with it >> i think melissaright that targets and walmart's woes are tjx's blessings in a way because they'll get interesting inventory going forward. there is also a big problem in terms of transportational labor costs going up so the margins are starting to get squeezed that is the big thing. no doubt consumers going down market at this point the question is how much consumer demand is going to overcome the cost factor going forward. and the other thing is, how much of consumer demand they see sustained through the christmas season that will be the big, open question on top of all that as you said the stock is very favorably valued some would say it is pretty much over valued at this point. there is a lot of risk here coming into these prices especially if they just guide to expectation. for the stock to really perform well they have to beat expectation. that is a tall order going in. >> there you have it that's the layout of a fun morning to see how they do thank you. we appreciate it >>> quick market alert t

melissa murray, judith browne dianis, except the director of the advancement project national office, and olivia julianna, political strategist corridor for gen z for change. it is good to see you all. melissa, i want to some of you. walk kansas was the first state to put the issue directly before voters, it will not be the last. november, kentucky will vote on a similar measure that rejects the right to abortion, and two blue states, california and vermont, will vote on amendments to shrine the right to abortion in their state constitutions. melissallot initiatives, as states start to follow indiana's lead by passing new abortion restrictions? thanks >> for having me, alicia. i think it's critically important that we have these voter initiatives, voter referendums that bring the prospect of direct democracy to this issue. because as we see an indiana, when these issues are put to representative democracy, the state legislature that have become republican controlled by design, three decades of partisan gerrymandering. you see very different outcomes. what we saw in kansas is even though individuals in that red state may differ on the question of abortion and morality, they have real skepticism about the prospect of the state making such an important decision -- and consigning children to there -- that's a major distinction here. when we have representative government, we have draconian bands like this, in part because of the way democracy has been hobbled by gerrymandering, voter suppression. -- we may have very different outcomes

melissa i don't really have an answer for you. but right now we're looking at bitcoin down about $21,540 >> maybe it's just risk off across the board, across assets today. we'll see. >> we'll see thank you, melissa, for hanging out. >> pleasure. >> hope to see you next week >>> have a great weekend, everybody, hope you join us on monday "squawk on the street" begins right now. >>> good friday morning, welcome to "squawk on the street." i'm carl quinn an -- la with mike santoli and dave faber. investors consider whether this bear market rally has run its course for now dollar is headed for the best weekly rally since june. bed bath shares plunging after it was confirmed investor ryan cohen sold his entire stake in the company. >> fed's comments weighing down the futures. >> and more fallout from weaker consumer demand weighing down a retailer, wayfair down this morning. ryan cohen exited his position in bed bath & beyond, amid stories about the company. >> their fundamentals have only worsened, something you only see in names we call the meme stocks, in terms of short squeeze that occurred in terms of some of the actions actions of mr. cohen sources of mine are really enraged about this, feeling