because although you were mixing with celebrities, with mick jagger and all the most famous musicians the fashion models in paris and milano and london, you seem to have had a sensibility that wasn't seduced just by celebrity and fame. you wanted something else. yeah, you know, itell you, i was telling you that for me, photography is a media. it's not that i am a photographer because i like black and white picture. you know, i'm not an artist. i think photography is a media, is a sociopolitical action. and that's the way i always try to use it. also, when i did pictures of, you know, fashion or advertising, every picture has got a political message. every one, even a postcard. see, what interests me about you is that i think from a young age, you were very political. and i think it's fair to say you were of the left. you know, you had strong opinions. and yet you entered the world of advertising, which is the most capitalistic form of communication. advertising is... it doesn't really touch me. i never actually did advertising — that's the point. but you were paid a lot of money by so

different about you because although you were mixing with celebrities, mickjagger and all the most mick jaggerost famous mickjagger and all the most famous musicians, all of the fashion models in paris and london, you seemed to have had a sensibility that was not seduced just by celebrity and fame. you want to do something else? —— wanted something else. for me, photography and media, it is not because i like black and white pictures, i am not an artist. i see photography as a media for political action. that's how i started to use it. also pictures of fashion and advertising. every picture is not political. everyone, even a postcard ——is political. i think at a young age were very political and i think it is fated that your of the left. you strong opinions. and yet you entered the world of advertising, the most capitalistic form of communication. you are paid a lot of money by some of the biggest brands and businesses in the world.— in the world. never advertised the products. _ in the world. never advertised the products, i— in the world. never advertised the products, i refused. - in the wo

what was mick jagger and everyone else taking because this new genre of older guys like motley crew,ibberish. >> greg: i think it's something called drugs. >> or is it not doing drugs anymore? >> greg: maybe, but perry was definitely on something, big bottles of whine. that's the problem with me being a star. it's good your remain obscure, jamie. because if you happen to embarrass or bottom out it's not going to be in public. if that was just in a bar maybe 20 people would have seen him, would have ended up on maybe surveillance video on instagram. but here it's on a highly rated show called "gutfeld!". >> good point. this happens to me every week and no one nose. it's more complicated with me because people are like we can't ask for our money back because the tickets were free. is there any way you could refund us our time? [ laughter ] [ applause ] >> you bring up a good point though, which is that we want our rock stars to drink and do drugs but not that much. where they can't perform. you want them to be crazy but then like what are you doing? people sent shots to the stage for m

. ♪ dancing in chicago, down in new orleans ♪ ashley: dancing in the street, david bow with by, mick jaggere, as you look down sixth avenue. kind of busy on the street but the sidewalks, not so much. good morning, everyone, it's 11 a.m. on this thursday, september the 12th. i'm ashley webster in for stu varney today. let's take a look at the markets for you. the dow has been down, tried to come back, and now it's heading down again, only a third of a percent. the s&p essentially flat, and the nasdaq, too, just up a enth or two to of a percent. let's take a look at big tech names. we like, of course, to keep an eye on those, they carry a lot of weight. alphabet, nvidia moving hire, but amazon, apple and microsoft are all down, microsoft off about half a percent. let's take a look at the 10-year treasury as well. the treasury has been, uh, it's moving slightly higher, up 3.3 basis points at 3.68%. we're also, by the way, keeping an eye on the fallout of a 4.7-magnitude earthquake in southern california reportedly centered in the malibu area, also a 2.if 8-mag magma tuesday aftersome but no --

know if robert plant, paul. know if robert plant, paul mccartney and mickjagger are mccartney and mick jagger it. and those who don't need it shouldn't get it, simple. means test it. i don't see the problem.— simple. means test it. i don't see the problem. peter, means testin: , see the problem. peter, means testing. in _ see the problem. peter, means testing, in wellingborough? - testing, in wellingborough? hello, nicky. i'm a 69. i've had — hello, nicky. i'm a 69. i've had this— hello, nicky. i'm a 69. i've had this winter fuel allowance two years running and when i first— two years running and when i first received it, i said to my wife — first received it, i said to my wife, "whatever is the government doing paying me this money— government doing paying me this money without any knowledge of whether— money without any knowledge of whether i— money without any knowledge of whether i need it or not?" and for the — whether i need it or not?" and for the last— whether i need it or not?" and for the last two years i've gone _ for the last two years i've gone straight down the local supermarket

what was mick jagger and everyone else saying?ew genre of these older guys like motley crue hate when the lead singer hi, m when he sings it's like, emily, come in. >> i think it's something called drugs or is it not doing >>ugs anymore? maybe. but definitely perry farrell was on somethingbe. s of w he was drinking big bottles of wine. that's the problem with being a star's theit jamie.your >> it's good that you remain obscure. yeah, because if jamie. you happen to embarrass or bottom out, it's not going to be in public. like, ift it's that was just in a peopl bar. >> maybe 20 people would have seen hin him with would end up on like maybe surveillance video on instagram. >> but here it's on a highly rated show called gutfeld and takeover. >> it's a very good point. this happens to me every week and no one knows. you knowan, it's more complicatd with me because people people are, you know, are like wey can't ask for our money back because take it for free. is there any wayauseckets you'e to refund us our time? but you work you brin

you know, i heard mick jagger mention this morning.t need the payment nehhen doesn't need the payment neither. neither does sir jim ratcliffe. but in to order get the payment away from them, the government is actually talking about removing it from millions of older people who definitely rely on that payment to pay their energy bills during the winter . actually, silver voices winter. actually, silver voices has suggested, an alternative and that is if there has to be a cut off point, which we don't agree with, but if there has to be one, it should be at the level of the higher rate of tax. so that would remove all these arguments about, you know, billionaires and millionaires and so on. getting it. and it would mean that those on modest incomes, because they've got a small work pension or something like that, or they've got savings and that those people would not lose their winter fuel payment. >> now, that is a really interesting point there because it sounds like there might be some negotiation, there might be some negotiation, ther

. >> one, one of which is that i think people understand that it is a bit weird that mick jagger or other a year payout every, every winter. >> but the problem is, if you means test it, it's something that's very expensive and difficult for the government to do. so they've gone for this blanket approach, which removes it from the huge majority of pensioners, and the charities have said that this will hit quite a few people below the poverty line. that's the first problem with this policy. i think the second one, as well is that it was announced in july , that it was announced in july, kind of separately from the budget, which is happening at the end of october. there's been a big delay in between the two. so there are a lot of union leaders here saying, you know, the government shouldn't be doing this. they should be taxing the rich. now, i happen to think and all the clues are there from what ministers say, that this government will be taxing the rich more or the well—off when it comes to the budget. on october 30th. so why didn't they do those decisions? those announcements , at the sam