we look at morality and religion. what that has done is left a big vacuum those supposed to reproductive rights to control women have been all too willing to fill that space and make the indictment of a woman taking care of herself as being immoral. think the only way to neutralize the is suppose a counter narrative in the same context. religious folk don't care what nonreligious folk don't think and vice versa. if there'll be a push back on the public space on morality it has to be people of faith understanding and critically dissecting the claim that abortion is immoral and pushing back in that regard. that's why am elated about the type of work that the pastor has done in making a case. >> i want to hear from the pastors to in terms of the same around good choice and moral argument. how does this translate into the work that you have done is pastors? >> we pastor in the area of washington, d.c. which supports -- so, when we talk about reproductive rights, when i think about so many of the women that we minister to

when it comes to morality and with regard to operating in the world so that morality within a profession with medical and legal ethics my personal moral ethics to govern by personal behavior and as a physician practicing medicine that dictates how i should be a practicing my craft and providing care to the people who have cared for me. where legally they are able to say to have health care that they need that requires me to ethically breach my duties to respect the autonomy of patients as well as my duty to do good. if morality is personal is personal for people so women's bodies of their lives that you cannot have laws that would govern how women or anyone makes a personal decision so without moral case for choice is the one stowe that is left unturned is that abortion is safe to protect the lives and no question that abortion represents safety. so when people make the argument so we pushed back on the morbidity with that claim it was dangerous and those that make decisions of reproduction it is within their agency as human beings to make those decisions. and avoiding questions of moral

language changed calling businessmen and women morally good. but that modern economic growth. with the greed and self-interest. when did that take off? if you look back with jesus or mosasaur confusion of and then you think it is helpful and it is neutral. but that is not intrinsically good. and this is probably reversible. with wall street or corruption and somebody that goes to work in the morning. and if that matters morally with the judeo-christian decision. and with 15 hours a day. if you don't do that as a moral pursue. and you will go into business. en to be in a positive way but now that moral living wages getting negative. with business and everybody is self interested i just want to highlight the book too weak a lot of speers. and she is just fun to read. that is important for the next generation take a look at this book with the of bibliography and they're all different others you can pursue but it is important to get the young generation motivated to get to work. and the kids coming now don't know what this is. the price for the cos

as i said, that is a moral failure. none of our religious leaders of any of the great religions would ever, ever accept. untreated nor will the american people. sayin second, i'm saying that i won't own it won't work politically. the president is the president. he's in charge. americans look to him for leadership and they note the republicans control both branches of congress and the white house. they know they are in charge. earlier this year, the kaiser founder foundation found that two thirds would blame president trump and congressional republicans for the future problems in our healthcare system. just as they blamed president obama when he was in charge, they will blame president trump when he was in charge. he's tweeting a way that someonn else is to blame when he's in charge won't work politically. especially when it comes to something as near and dear to americans as healthcare, god's great gift to us, life itself.th so, it just won't work saying that democrats are to blame. believe me, we won't stand idly by an

that's why morality matters. hillary went out and said oh, she did not talk about morality.ried to convince her to do so once but she did not do it. she talked about competence, i have experience and i know better and strong and i know how to work with the other side and all of those stuff and no morality. nothing. >> everything trump said was about morality, about right and wrong and it was his version of right and wrong. and in his tweets, his tweets have a structure. people think he's crazy and does crazy things at night, the opposit opposite is truth. he has four types of tweets, one of them is called preemptive framing. he tries to frame his issues first and he tries to get people to believe it his way before they got a chance with anything else. >> we saw that of comey and a lit a litany of things. preemptive framing. >> the second thing is diversion, the russian thing is getting closer to him so he had to attack somebody in the media, mikah and he creates a diversion and then there is attack of the messenger, somebody saying something of him being awful along and here

kennedy along a moral path to understanding that civil rights was a moral issue. that successfully? >> well he did it by a lot of persistence. he did it by never letting up. he cemespent a lot of time writ about it. he spent a lot of time in jail. he, you know, met with kennedy several times. and -- just, just used the force of his, of his character, really, to, to awacen the conscience i think of john kennedy and make him think more about -- the -- the, problem of -- of civil right and discrimination in our country. >> why? bobby is a character in this book to some extent, obviously. even though it is about jfk and mlk. why did bobby get that so much more easily than his brother. bobby didn't start in the right place either. he had a transformation as well. seems, you can disagree with me. my read is that bobby was a better student than his brother was? >> yeah, he was a better student for sure. he was also a more passion that person. and i think that's what sort of what drove bobby. bobby is the kind of guy who wore his emotions on his sleeves. on his sleeve. an

not he does agreement, you are a moral authority.ou are casting moral aspersions. >> save your sarcasm okay. >> tucker: it's not sarcasm. it's contempt for your nonargument. >> the conservative movement -- when i grew up, ronald reagan warned about the evil empire and you are young get up at the evil empire. >> tucker: it's a different empire, max. >> not very different. vladimir putin is a former kgb man and you are applauding what he's doing. >> tucker: since you have -- honesty policy. let me ask you a question. if we were to follow the course of action you are suggesting, you are demanding we follow on moral ground. having as we set -- >> a course of action is that, tucker? >> tucker: you fear assad's -- who would run that? do you think the kurds would run syria once we dispose of them? >> i don't. i think would be very difficult to do in any case. i think it should have been done in 2011, 2012. >> tucker: what you think we should do now? >> should we collaborate with russia and committing war crimes in syria, is that your advice

one is the moral argument and one is a practical argument. the moral argument is this. america is an idea appeared in this life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are universal and are good for us and it can't be good for us and not for them. so we are at our best when they leave from power and principles. the principle that no man, woman or child should have to live in the direst of poverty and worst of circumstances because we are also a compassionate nation that actually believes as many problems as we have, we have been given an extraordinary bounty. if you go to some of the places in the world, i don't care how bad it looks in the united states of america. it is much, much worse. how do you turn a blind eye to those children playing in the dirt in haiti and how do you turn a blind eye to an ebola pandemic in liberia? we are too good to be that way. and so, the moral argument is, you know, i am christian and i have been told that what you do for the least of my brothers come you do for me. whatever your tradition in an endeavor that influence comes from compassio

that alone will improve morality. if you allow bad apples to infect the organization, that's exactly what ends up happening. mr. glawe, we had a hearing about a month or two ago an transnational criminal organizations. focused on ms 14, with your background, priorities on the homeland security side of this committee, protecting critical infrastructure, combatting islamic terrorists and other violent actors. it's become so apparent that primary root cause for unsecure border is insatiable demand for drugs. led to the creation of the drug cartels. as i traveled around wisconsin on a national security tour talking to local, state, federal law enforcement. biggest problem? drugs. speak a little bit about that as your priority in terms of getting intelligence and analyzing that to attack it effectively. >> thank you for the question and meeting with me too. i'm extremely passionate about it. i would argue that i'm sure our friends and family, everyone has been impacted by narcotics or substance abuse addition. threats are

that is the moral question. we can take it off into a back alley and say that is not what we're trying to do but that is what we are try to do. host: do you see this as an ?nron -- an end run guest: they knew the ineffectiveness and cost of the central government collecting power to itself would have to be neutralized. what wasbout restoring originally in our constitution in terms of the state having the ability to make decisions. we $100 billion we waste every year in the military, who is working on that? i have documented it. who was working on that? nobody. the question is, do we have representative's and the government are we going to continue to waste money? they just came out yesterday and payments,ropriate $145 billion. that is enough to run the state of a, 20 years. why would we continue to allow -- state of oklahoma, 20 years. why will we continue to allow that? host: using article five to restore freedom. joining us to talk about the concepts, ed from michigan. republican line, you are next. caller: i

that is the moral question. we can take it off into a back alley and say that is not what we're trying to do but that is what we are try to do. host: do you see this as an ?nron -- an end run guest: they knew the ineffectiveness and cost of the central government collecting power to itself would have to be neutralized. what wasbout restoring originally in our constitution in terms of the state having the ability to make decisions. we $100 billion we waste every year in the military, who is working on that? i have documented it. who was working on that? nobody. the question is, do we have representative's and the government are we going to continue to waste money? they just came out yesterday and payments,ropriate $145 billion. that is enough to run the state of a, 20 years. why would we continue to allow -- state of oklahoma, 20 years. why will we continue to allow that? host: using article five to restore freedom. joining us to talk about the concepts, ed from michigan. republican line, you are next. caller: i

that will dramatically improve morale. in the administration if you allow bad apples to continue to infect the organization that is exactly what ends up happening. mr. glawe, we had a hearing about a month or two ago on transnational criminal organizations. we focused on ms-13. with your background, local law enforcement, the priorities of this on the homeland security side of this security has been border security, cybersecurity, combating islamic terrorists and any other extreme violent actor. it has become so apparent -- i will say the primary root cause of our unsecured border is our insat yabble demand for drugs and that has led to the creation of the drug cartels, these transnational criminal organizations. as i traveled around wisconsin on a national security tour, talking to local, state, federal law enforcement, asked them what's the biggest problem you're dealing with, without exception it was drugs. the crime it creates, the broken families. speak a little bit about that as your priority in terms of getting the

the chief knew that moral power was fragile and must be nurtured. you would be alarmed to know that there has been an erosion of the vital capital he worked public's and that the phase in the judiciary, and even in this court itself, has declined. a gallup poll taken a few months for -- months before bush v. gor e indicated 62% of our people thought the court was doing a good job. today the number is 45%. some suggest the possibility that this decreased public admiration for the court is attributable at least in part to the much lower views the public now has of government as a whole. if they are right, and the court is primarily a victim of the in and dysfunction contempt for government in general, it only connects or intimately the trends -- connects more intimately the trends i have noted. one thing i am sure, chief justice burger would be alarmed. and here is how, in my view, what i have said so far comes gather, and would come together for the chief justice. against the backdrop of a growing allergy to nuance and complexity, and the emergence o

of war strategic expressions of morals. it is a reference to the early grounding in the work of -- the interesting thing, too, about the rise of lawyers is vietnam andto military lawyers. in the 1977 protocols one of the frustrations western states have with third world delegates as they were not trained in the laws of war. that hampered them dramatically when they were attempted to participate in the development of the laws of war. they were good advocates and it figured out how to use the u.n. general assembly on their own behalf, but when they switch to a different form, the laws of war, they were outmaneuvered. george aldrich, a representative of the united states, basically said his frustration if you read through his notes, his frustration with third delegates has to do with their misunderstanding of the law. they can't figure out the difference between unavoidable suffering and unnecessary suffering. then i was going through how law is made now. it seems that one of the interesting things in michael smith talks about

one of the things that i rarely hear about is, in addition to the moral, physical, mental degradation of the human being of color, was the sexual abuse as well. that seems to get pushed to the back of the story. way, there were -- mber of rapes, ogletree rapes, adultry. children born that were never recognized, shall i say? and counted as members of the society. that is huge to be left at the bottom. i wish it would come up further. prof. polgar: i certainly don't mean to imply -- >> oh, not you. prof. polgar: but in general, i totally agree with you. this effect was a factor that abolitionists were beginning to point to and would especially .2 by the 1830's -- especially from to by the 1830's white northerners as it promotes sexual abuse of female slaves that were disempowered. those arguments are beginning in their infant stages. by the 1830's, absolutely, this is a key argument abolitionists are making in the way that it degrades and dehumanizes sexuallywhen, -- women, and adds to the slave population for the master. there is an economic interest in masters sexually violating their

the chief knew that moral power must be nurtured. he would be along to know that there is erosion in the building he worked to build. and that the public ice faith in the judiciary and in the court itself has declined. a gallop poll taken a few months before bush versus gore ended and today the number is 45%. some suggest with plausibility that this decreased public admiration for the court is a tribu attributable in part of the government views that the government has as a whole. if you're right, the government has and can contend in general that it can connect more intimately the trends i've noted. but one thing i'm sure, chief justice burger would be alarmed. and here is how in my view what i've said so far comes together. and would come together for the chief justice. against the backdrop of a growing nuance in complexity and the coliseum of society, he would argue that the court, especially the court, must stand even stronger as a testament to the power of thought and reason. and make no mistake about it, he would everyone size

but podcast host jesse meyerson says that's exactly what a moral government ought to do.ead, jesse, you first. >> there is no such thing as a market free of government intervention. in order to have an economy, commerce, finance, complex trade, debt resolution -- john: some governments enforce fairness. >> a massive government, the largest government programs are contract enforcement, property rights and resolution of debt. without those -- [laughter] john: the biggest programs are entitlements. >> the biggest program are entitlements, the regulatory agencies that actually reject contracts, they tell us that we cannot contract. [laughter] unless we abide by some guidelines or some bunch of bureaucrats have determined. i can't take whatever drug i want, i have to get permission from the fda. i can't, i can't build whatever automobile i want, ask google, you have to get permission -- john: all right. let's go back to this, the moral thing -- and i think most people agree with jesse on this -- is that life's unfair, government should step in and make it better. and you, the

it is a morally bankrupt regime. we must have a clear moral orientation.ponsibility does the international community have to try to make that engagement more meaningful, to bring about the change you want to see inside china? human rights, that is the integral pa rt human rights, that is the integral part of the engagement with china. china is a big country, with rising economic and political power. it is the elephant in the room that we cannot ignore. this is every shame thatis cannot ignore. this is every shame that is morally corrupt, it is a dictatorship, it is controlling its people, deceiving people of other countries. when we deal with this country, we must take human rights issues into consideration. we cannot just play one policy field against another. we have to abandon the idea that ——. our democratic life has been affected. our condolences for the loss of your friend liu xiaobo, and thank you for talking to us about him. if you have taken a cheque to the natural history museum, you will have been greeted by dippy the dipper dopers, but now anot

problems, it is just there are real workload and morale problems, it isjust not realistic.blems, it isjust not realistic. a key part of the government's plan is to encourage psychiatrists and mental health nurses who have left the nhs to return. whether that can be achieved is far from clear. and hugh is here now. — how realistic is this target? there are many uncertainties over it. a number of nhs trusts in england have said it is difficult to recruit staff right now. so this policy is extremely ambitious. it has also been pointed out that in england, new nurse trainees from september will have to start paying their own tuition fees and they will have to borrow the money, and there has been a decline in application forms for that position. there is a public sector pay cap, 1% pay which many would argue has deterred people from going intojobs like this many would argue has deterred people from going into jobs like this and which has led to some people rethink, a big debate going on about that in government. whether that is changed or not. so a number in the health world say

virtue or moral value.se or a policewoman, orafire a nurse or a policewoman, or a fire officer is not worth more by way of moral value than they stand in the economic hierarchy and you have to take that to one side and look at it asa side and look at it as a market—based calculation. once you get to that, and strip out the notion that these people are intrinsically more virtuous, then the figures make more sense. but people think, the bbc isa but people think, the bbc is a public organization and in the end there is no organisation and there's no need for a news reader to be paid that much? the problem with that, if other people are paid a great deal more and i'm afraid the bbc has to operate by trying to get the best talent, and to get it for a price thatis talent, and to get it for a price that is always likely to be discounted to what everybody else is paying but it has to be reasonable enough to get people in theirjob and recruit new people and it is not a lwa ys and recruit new people and it is not alw

how is the president working on their morale? >> i think the same way he works with all of us. he empowers us to do our jobs, and i don't think it matters whether you're a cabinet secretary, a low level staffer, we're here to do a job. he's asked us to do it and he expects us to get it done and i've spent a good bit of time with quite a few cabinet secretaries over the last couple days and morale is high. >> one more point about transgender service members. not here in this country but overseas and there are 18 countries where transgender members are allowed to serve openly. the uk is one. australia is another. israel is third. the president referred to disruptions. what does he mean, and is he concerned that there are disruptions in our allies' militaries and should we worry about that from a military standpoint? >> as i said earlier, this decision was made after extensive discussions with his national security team and the president decided it was in the best interest of the military to end this obama policy. i can't speak to anything about another country. pretty focused on

never before in history had there been such a triumph of moral leadership. few days after the armistice president wilson let it be known that he proposed to go to paris as the head of the american peace delegation. many of his associates, including myself, advised him not to go. we argued that he would be involved in secret committee meetings where his the most powerful voice in the world would be still. we believed that from the white house it could be thunder and lightning to the whole world, but that in paris he would be trapped in intrigue and in greed. our armed services fought for the ideals of our country, it is now my duty to play my full part and making good what -- to obtain. >> however, from the nature of the man, from his knowledge of centuries of failure in world attempts to prevent war and preserve lasting peace, it was inevitable that woodrow wilson would leave for europe. he boarded the steamship george washington accompanied by his wife, his physician admiral grayson and a number of aides. ♪ president wilson arrived in france late in 1918. >

virtue or moral value.lice woman or a fire officer isn't worth more by way of moral value than they stand in the economic hierarchy. you have to take that to one side and look at it as a market base calculation. and once you get to that and strip out the notion that these people are intrinsically more virtuous, then the figures make some more sense. people still thinking the bbc is a public organisation and, in the end, there is no justification for a newsreader to be paid £500,000 a year. the problem with that is, if other people are paying a great deal more, i'm afraid the bbc has to operate by trying to get the best talent that they can for a price that is always likely to be discounted to what everybody else is paying. but it has to be reasonable enough to get people into those jobs, keep them and recruit new people. and it isn't always happy and this is difficult and embarrassing, but i think the bbc is right to have a policy that says — we need talent and we're going to have to pay. a lot of viewers a

talking about our moral case forfree trade in washington talking about our moral case for free tradef liberalisation. he also talked about the special working group set up to forge a new trading the international monetary fund has lowered its growth forecast for the uk warning that activity has been weaker than expected in the first part of the year. the imf said the economy would grow by 1.7%, instead of the 2% it initially forecast. it lowered its prediction for the uk and the united states, but upgraded the outlook for several eurozone countries. the world's leading oil producing countries are meeting in russia today. ministers from the organisation of petroleum exporting countries — opec — as well as other oil producers are discussing plans they've put in place to deal with the current oversupply of oil. earlier this year, they cut production in an effort to stop crude prices from falling. budget airline ryanair has announced a 55% rise in profits for the three months to june. it said the figures were boosted by this year's early easter. however its share price has dropped 5%, af

it is a mentioned any longer but it is all about morality. certainly about the civil-rights movement and the disruption in the hierarchy of society when society was becoming chaotic . so those ahead of the first baptist church in to be a major segregationist end began to talk about integration and people that day had to worry about. and even part of this disruption like those on the campus so these parallels raid in without ever having to say a. in with this segregationists' schools. but what the operative said the rise of the christian right with the u.s. taxes regulations and with that certain extent. >> i was raised in the evangelical church and at a crossroads moment so with this moment and then these splits it if feels like that to mean evangelicalism and an overwhelmingly voted for donald trump you have this faction of these evangelicals in and then just working my way out but that feels like very like a reformation and there was no way we could agree. >> and as far is you are concerned. we did not mention this. but with that christian

who has got that moral right?y, a lot of christians are going to disagree with me on this. i would say when people are in harm's way, this mother was born in guatemala. it was too dangerous for her there. so she fled. this is not just one person. these are lots of stories. she flees, she's an indigenous person. she's not mexican. she is mayan. she stands out like a sore thumb. the mob starts going after her. she has got to choose herself between throwing herself on the mercy of the united states or possibly having her child kidnapped or killed. there are millions of stories like that. i realize this is a complicated issue. i understand. i'm not trying to vilify somebody who disagrees. i was in a crisis of conscience. >> tucker: but it doesn't seem like that. i understand that and i am much more sympathetic to you than i thought i would be. you do seem to be moved by compassion but you are also attacking a system that was decided by the united states congress, they voted this into law. you are saying all of these l

the moral of this um, i'm not sure. [laughter] >> but i think one of the morals is that accountability takes many forms and it is certainly structured and shaped by the law, but that's a -- you know, feel good about that story or bad? depends on your point of view. the law shape did the way that family, that neighborhood responded? absolutely. will he go to jail? no. but was the law irrelevant? i don't think so. [laughter] >> i'll add on that very example. i'm not sure this is implicit in your question, but i want to build on what you said, because so many discussions about accountability assume that if someone doesn't go to jail, if someone doesn't end up in court, then there's no accountability. i just think that is a large mistake. accountability in general is when a government, in the when annt context, is actor's behavior is known to another entity with authority to judge that behavior. and punish that person, if they think -- or sanction or something -- if they think that person has acted inappropriately unjustifi

morale is important in the epa.important in the state department, every place else, but it's very important for people who are taking those risks. >> sure. >> ultimately at the end of the day, a president can only make good decisions if he has good information and cares about that information. you know, trump is undercutting that whole premise, and that could lead us into even deeper and darker trouble. >> evan, you get the last word of this segment, and also is any of this going to potentially change based on the results of bob mueller's investigation? >> look, i would say this. what david corn just said is correct, but i think the issue that i'm very concerned about is not what the rank and file think or feel with regard to morale. that's an issue, but it's really about how this administration is going to direct law enforcement and counterintelligence resources. recent reporting has indicated that the russians have stepped up espionage activities even since the election. so forget about morale for a second. where

ethics of immigration enforcement, we do so guided by the same moral compass and with the same moral compassion for today's immigrants, many of whom are escaping the same kinds of tragic circumstances as those who we welcomed in the past. how can we not take into consideration our impact on real people? who by different policies or of the past or a different drawing of a border could be you or me? let me reiterate how much i appreciate the way our subcommittee does its business. even when we disagree, we do it with respect for one another and we are honored to serve. i hope we will continue to work together so by the end of this appropriations process we have a final bill. enclosing, i would be remiss if i did not -- not acknowledge my outstanding staff. again, thank you, mr. chairman, and i yield back. ranking members as well as chairman carter for their remarks. our father served together and i'm so proud to be serving with you. we live in the greatest country on the face of the earth. it's good to know the ties that i does armstrong strong. thank you so much for your remarks. will

and favorable or even observing this moralization of greed this greed is good mentality this culture absolutely selects for psychopaths thinkers you know people who literally have no empathy whatsoever because once you have successfully cleaved off ethical considerations you're incredibly efficient i think there's nothing wrong with aspiring to be comparable i don't even know that there's anything wrong with aspiring to be rich but the aspiration of wall street is how you money and your money is the amount of money so vast that you could pick up the phone or save you to whoever you wanted without repercussion. one of the necessary illusions for the general public is that we live in a capitalist economy but the rich don't believe for a minute of the insist on a powerful state to protect them from market the supply so it's cold and sacks makes a risky transaction. they're basically protected if it crashes they can run through the nanny state with their trap and the builder good morning this is a pivotal moment for america's economy. problems that originated in the credit markets and fi

i'll give you an example of an atrocity and what we can learn about -- from it about the moral dilemmas involved. the sense of the book is a scene of a nighttime surprise attack by several hundred british forces on 104 continentals, american dragoons who are sleeping. it's an attack with bayonets only, to reduce the friendly fire risk to maintain the element of surprise and play on the psychology of those beside to be attacked. american forces are less accustomed to bayonet warfare that european professional arms. they have an intense terror of that weapon. the surprise works. the british forces surround the six ponds. the americans very quickly, when yanked out of their sleep realize they have no chance of resisting and seek to surrender but this is an instance where the british forces continue and club and bayonet their way through that grisly scene. what we learned from the statements of some of the american survivors is that they observe some of their assailants to be hesitating. they seemed to have doubts. was it right to attack their fellow subjects who were begging for quarter, f

in particular, the family of morales speaking out. they had an emotional plea asking for the asylum of their father, they say that he's a good man, just here in the u.s. trying to make ends meet. here's more on the plea. >> my father never demonstrated selfish actions. his actions have shown only honesty and courage. to give a better life to my mother and my brother and sisters. >> reporter: that was morales's daughter you just heard previously. she telling the crowd today that her father, criminal history, and essentially is a fabric in annapolis community creating chicken statues across the area. other advocates spoke out not only rallying behind morales but in supporter of other immigrants who have been terrorized by the government >> our nation's capitol has been infected with chickens. chickens who hide behind pens and paper. chicken whose hide behind security. chickens who hide behind fists. instead of getting out with the people. chickens who hide behind toxic. >> reporter: now, in the video, you see here, you can see that ther

>> i say i accept your moral authority.e make the decisions, the courts rule on what is in the constitution and we live by that. that's what i say. >> you don't live by it. because you don't accept it. you can't accept it. you can't accept it. >> let me go back to matters of the law and running for president because matter of the law, and that's what i'm talking about and this is the difficult position you have placed yourself in. by saying you are pro life you want to ban abortion. how do you ban abortion without some kind of sanction? then you get into a tricky question about sanction. a fine on human life, what you call murder, a fine for a woman who finds herself pregnant. >> it will have to be determined. >> how about a guy that gets a woman pregnant, is he responsible for an abortion under the law? or he is not? >> it has different feelings, different people. i would say no. >> all right. well, you know, they're usually involved. >> when we return, let me finish with trump watch. you're watching "hardball, a special e

according to a survey of federal agencies, ina is 304 305 enteral agencies and their employee morale. tsa is only slightly better, right 303 out of 305. strong leadership will be necessary to strengthen the workforce at these offices and ensure that these components are recruiting and retaining the most qualified talent. the culture and sentiment in an office and honestly contribute to hiring and keeping the best personnel who in turn are working hard to keep us safe.mister pekoske, with threats to our transportation system tsa as an essential role in protecting our homeland. i've made clear several times my concerns about the presence proposed cuts to the budget particularly when it comes to funds for counterterrorism programs. once you are confirmed i expect you to make clear to the administration what you need to do your job and you should not back down until the administration proposes a budget that works for you. mister glawe, i expect you to ensure that the work of your office remains apolitical and informed decisions at the highest level of the department and intelligence commu

book on people because people from the say yes but in the book in a moral sense of. my. own i'm a bit of nothing left off allowed me. something to watch. on long enough something. a little to hospitals look not that i would like to now maybe maybe a magic bullet after the. present growing backlash against social media and actually the smarts the most independents the most interesting people particularly young people are actually giving up social media and i think over the next few years we're going to see is that only losers will be left on social media with. credit as one of the basic instruments to drive an economy but it can also lead to tragedy i didn't i took the whole gist i came back up and that that the debt steichen dinka and it was spiraling out of control on. many lives have been broken really excessive that the banks got you into trouble and all the big bankers got big. and they're going to go. the banks but i just didn't think of. people see you know the future. you know you become ill. your relationship breaks down you become a country. more secure. with mo

fine, i'm hands off, i'm not going to own it, because it's happening on your watch and you have a moral and political obligation to try to fix it and help people's lives. >> that's why this business move doesn't work in this particular context, because this is a business, to use the analogy, that is on his balance sheet. so he can't walk away from this. he has set responsibilities. and if he were to walk away, as he suggested he would, which means, how do you walk away? how do you let it fail? you don't provide the federal subsidies. you don't let insurance companies know whether or not the insurance mandate, that creates a healthier and wider pool, exists. if you do that, people will lose care. it is mostly on his watch. >> he's provided everything

morale his high and i'm thrilled to see. that with respect to the president, i talk about the fact i'm with him almost every day in the oval office, delivering him both things that are really current, trying to prepare him for the things right in front of him and also working hard to ensure we're building a baseline of knowledge in the same way i'm working to build my baseline of knowledge. it's hard work. the president is a tough customer. he asks hard questions and we hope if we don't have the answer today we'll get back to him and make sure we deliver it to him. i've read the story, too. i can only tell you my experience, and the experience of the officers -- my officers who have been with the president as well. he not only values and appreciates the people but is counting on to us deliver for him, and i'm counting on my team to deliver for him as well. >> that's great. one thing near thes me as an intelligence officer is what we seem to be occurring across government, including capitol hill, is a sort of culture of leaka

everyone had said -- on the morale of the cabinet. anthony scar muchi this morning on new day, said the secretary has tough skin. how is the president working with the cabinet secretaries right now. how is the president working with the morale. >> he empowers us to do our jobs. i don't think it matters whether you're a cabinet secretary or a low-level staffer. we're here to do a job and he asked to us do it and he expects us to get it done. i've spent a good bit of time with quite a few cabinet secretaries over the last couple of days and morale is high. >> service members not here in this country, but overseas. there are 18 countries where transgender service members are allowed to serve openly. the uk is one. australia is another. israel is a third. the president in his tweet this morning referred to disruptions. what does he mean? and is he concerned that there are disruptions in our allies' militaries in australia, uk and israel? and should we worry about that from a military standpoint? >> this decision was made after extensive d

. >> tengo moral para decirlo porque yo soy un presidente de moral, Ética.chavismo al que frecuentemente llaman el monstruo en relaciÓn a la cÁrcel, donde estaba preso el opositor. >> no comparto esa decisiÓn pero la acato pero no estoy de acuerdo. reportero: el dirigente facilista es el que mÁs atacaba a lÓpez, incluso solicitan una revisiÓn para que le dieron mÁs aÑos de condena. >> estÁ ya en su cueva metido por los prÓximos 13 aÑos y los que vengan despuÉs por asesino. >>no implicarÍa ningÚn tipo de compromiso de lÓpez que exhortaba a seguir con las protestas. >>reitero mi compromiso de luchar, hasta conquistar la libertad. protestas que el gobierno quiere acabar pero no consigue la fÓrmula,, buscarÍa darle un giro esta situaciÓn que estÁ en cuenta regresiva, impulsando plebiscito y convocando una asamblea. presentador: siguiendo con esta noticia el secretario de estados americanos, reaccionÓ a la reclusiÓn domiciliaria de leopoldo lÓpez. desde washington las duras palabras de almagro contra el rÉgimen de maduro en los prÓximos pasos de la oea, frente a

who has a moral right to come to the united states? >> we are a sanctuary church. people from guatemala. do you remember the colin powell's pottery barn rule? this young mother and her son were born into a country that had been destabilized and as an american, i feel like i'm partially responsible for that. to give her sanctuary. >> tucker: guatemala had a crew backed by the united state united states, probably what you are referring to. germany and japan, in effect, we orchestrated crew is in those country. they don't have sky hybrid rates. i don't understand -- u.s. was much more involved in germany and japan. those are not a mess. how do you prove guatemala's foreign policies are a result of u.s. foreign policy? >> i'm just a presbyterian minister. in austin, texas. i had a family come and ask her sanctuary. our church is a democracy. we all voted on that. because i knew the story down there, i didn't feel her story started when she got to our boundary. i'm not a political scientist. i did not feel like, as a christian, that i could close the door under those te