these are the results of the attack on the russian military airfield in morozivsk, rostov region. a number of ukrainian media, citing their own sources, write that this is the successful work of our specialists and defenders. in addition to equipment, about 20 russian terrorists were killed or wounded, and the local governor. reports that eight people who were escorted were injured there are investigative actions, an explosive was allegedly detonated in a drone that they were studying. i should note that su-24 and su-34 front-line bombers were based at the airport. it is from them that the occupiers drop cabs on our cities and villages. the reports also say that the airfields of iysk and engels were under fire. this is in two clicks. the next stage after digital summons will be smart mobilization, deputy minister of defense kateryna chornogorenko said in an interview with armiya inform. she emphasized that this will be a continuation of the recruiting approach. a person will have a choice and will understand his entire route in the army. the armed forces of ukraine is the largest

eisk, engels and morozivsk.l, in principle, i see. honey, that's a good thing, but for it to actually work, because we can't say if there were really as many planes damaged as we would like, because after all, a drone, well, that's the kind of thing, i would said, not very accurate, there they do not have the opportunity to adjust them at the last moment, how should these strikes on these airfields be so that they were real. effective and have resulted in fewer bombers in our skies, at least? the answer to your question is almost obvious: it is necessary to increase the number of drones that can attack these lithuanians, where russian bombers and fighters are stored, they correctly say that it is necessary to fight not with the consequences, but with the cause, that is, not with the bombs that are already flying, which were dropped by the plane, and with planes, and it is desirable... to do this even before they took off, what we produce longer range drones that can add 300 km distance, it's very good, it's most

the end of what was said about the strikes by these drones on three airfields, eisk, engels and morozivskl, in principle, of course, this is a good thing, but for it to really give a result, because we can't say whether there were really as many planes damaged as we would like. uh because after all, a drone, well, it’s such a thing, i would say, not very well-aimed, there they don’t have the opportunity to adjust them at the last moment, how should these strikes on these airfields be so that they are really effective and have given the result that there will be fewer bombers in our skies, at least, well, the answer is in your question, almost obviously, it is necessary to increase... the number of drones that can attack these airfields where russian bombers and fighters are stored, they rightly say that it is necessary to fight not with the effects, but with the cause, that is not with bombs that are already in flight, dropped by a plane, but with planes, and preferably before they're airborne, the fact that we 're making longer-range drones that can go 300 km is pretty good , this is mos

eisk, engels and morozivsk., in principle, of course, this is a good thing, but so be it really gave a result, because we cannot say whether there were really as many planes damaged as we would like. because after all, a drone, well, it’s such a thing, i would say, not very well-aimed, there they don’t have the opportunity to adjust them at the last moment, how should these strikes on these airfields be so that they are really effective and give the result is that there will be fewer bombers in our skies, at least, well , the answer is in your question, almost obviously, it must be increased. drones that can to attack these airfields where russian bombers and fighters are stored, they rightly say that it is necessary to fight not with the consequences, but with the cause, that is, not with the bombs that are already flying, dropped by the plane, but with the planes, and it is desirable to do this even before , how they got into the air, the fact that we are producing longer range drones that can add 300 km dista

, there are 300 km, and the veeysk ​​airfield is about a kilometer... 150 and when we talk about morozivskhose airfields that were attacked by ukrainian drones today, then i actually expected this attack, because in fact we understand that if we have increased the number of drones in our arsenal, then they must first of all be directed not only at the enemy's refineries, but also at those airfields where the enemy uses to base those planes that are carried out for kabama attacks on the territory of ukraine, on the territory of morozovsky there in... yesterday, according to satellite images, there were somewhere around 24 of these su-34 bombers, three su-35 fighters , which are covering these su-34s, which are carrying out drone attacks, and if this was really carried out, 403 60 drones were carried out strikes on this morozov airfield, we'll see, we'll wait for the pictures , we'll see what the results are, as i repeat , there was water on the engels airfield, it's 700 km, the enemy bases tu-95s, tu-160s and tu-22s there, which are used for strikes on ukraine , and that the airfield last y

eisk, engels and morozivsk.ple, immediately. honey, that's a good thing, but for it to really work, because we can't say if there were really as many planes damaged as we'd like, because after all, a drone, well, that's the thing, i'd say , not very well-aimed, there they do not have the opportunity to adjust them at the last moment, how should there be such and such strikes on these airfields so that they were really... effective and gave the result that there will be fewer bombers in our skies, at least the answer is in your question, almost obviously, it is necessary to increase the number of drones that can attack these airfields where russian bombers and fighter jets are stored, they correctly say that it is necessary to fight not with the consequences, but with the cause, that is , not with the bombs that are already flying, which were dropped by the plane, but with the planes, and it is desirable ... to do this even before they rose into the air. the fact that we produce longer-range drones that can add a

these are the results of the attack on the russian military airfield in morozivsk, rostov region.a number of ukrainian media, citing their own sources, write that this is the successful work of our special forces and defenders. besides that. the technicians of about 20 russian terrorists were killed or wounded, and the local governor reports that eight people were injured who were conducting investigative actions there, an explosive device allegedly detonated from a drone that they were studying, i note that front-line su-24 and su-34 bombers were based at the airfield , it is from them that the occupiers drop cabs on our cities and villages. rospablik writes that yeisk and engels airfields were under fire. espresso's volunteer kitchen continues to work for victory. for the second year in a row, we have been making our own vitamin mixtures for the armed forces. currently , the initiative is gaining momentum and in parcels to the front, in addition to vitamins, there are also other goodies that our defenders need: dried fruits, nuts, jerky, lozenges, dry soups and borschts, lard an

from the end of what was said about... will hit these ee drones on three airfields, eisk engelsy morozivsk in principle, of course, this is a good thing, but for it to really give a result, because we cannot say whether there were really as many planes damaged as we would like, because after all, a drone, well it such a thing, i would say, is not very well-aimed, there they... do not have the opportunity to adjust them at the last moment, how should these strikes on these airfields be so that they are really effective and give results, so that there is less in our sky, bombers, to say the least? well the answer is in your question almost obviously, it is necessary to increase the number of drones that can attack these airfields where the russian... and fighters are rightly said that it is necessary to fight not with the consequences, but with the cause, that is, not with the bombs that are already flying, that were dropped by the plane and with airplanes, and it is desirable to do this even before they are in the air, the fact that we are producing longer-range drones that can add a distan

from the end of what was said about these strikes, with drones on three airfields, eisk, engels and morozivsk principle, of course, this is a good thing, but for it to really give a result, because we cannot say whether there were really as many planes damaged as we would like i wanted to, because after all, a drone, well, it is... how should these strikes on these airfields be, so that they are really effective and give results, so that there are fewer bombers in our sky, at least? the answer is in your question, almost obviously: it is necessary to increase the number of drones that can attack these... the place where russian bombers and fighters are stored, rightly say that it is necessary to fight not with the consequences, but with the cause, that is, not with the bombs, which are already flying, which were dropped by the plane, and with planes, and it is desirable to do this even before they went up in the air, the fact that we are making longer range drones that can add 300 km distance is very good, this is most likely the oril 300, it is to... similar in appearance to the gray rail, t