i ithe sessions stance onon sotomayor, is it a autut h own agenda m morthth it is some anancef raising legitimate questions about her oror daiaing her nomiminaonon? >> first, i i veve n talked to the senanatoababouthis, so i'm nogogointo get into divining his intentntio.. i think republican, inin aouough plplac jeff sessision m mit mcconnell, leader of the partrt a andornyn head of ththe mmmmite, two basic reasons. one hahandththe se of the party nts a very strong case to o be mamadegainst sotomayor. they believe some e t the atements she made in t theasast, about t --rorothe legislating frfromhe bench, the wise latato remark we've made so m mucofof the are things that ndamentally disqualifyfy h. t thether hand, john cornynyn understands, it doeses n l lk good f foromomne who has as yoveveisted the ratings, verery alified ratings. hiananicoman for the republicananarartyo be out attataining. in the end, ththeye e ry likely not to w winhahaargument, excuse meme, cacae you've got 52 senate seats fofor momocrs, and it's gogointo alienate the hispanic vote f froththe publican party. >>veven