mr. mcdonnell: ok. >> 3 digits? >> i will clean up while we wait. mr. mcdonnell: hold on one second. we are being corrected. >> a want to make sure we're all on the same page. we will replace this list with what is prepared by the consultant and the task force will review those neighborhoods. mr. mcdonnell: that is correct. >> thank you. >> can i clarify something very quickly? mr. mcdonnell: there is no such thing as very quickly in this process. go ahead. >> west of twin peaks submission here, what we submitted was the planning neighborhood. it was not the council neighborhood boundaries. what is on here is actually correct. mr. mcdonnell: thank you. do you have an electronic document? ms. tidwell: it is a subset of what i included. maybe just for purposes of, we can move district by district. mr. mcdonnell: ok. we will get that information and insert that. can we move to section 6? anything else in section 5? we are going to insert -- we are going to insert the neighborhoods into this

mr. mcdonnell: thank you. mr. alonso: i am going to say yes, and real quick, it was a pleasure working with all of you, and hopefully i never have to work with you in this capacity again. [laughter] mr. alonso: but in the end, we pretty much brought the best out of the city as we could. thank you. >> i vote in support of the map. i also really want to thank everybody for working together on this, and it has been a pleasure to work with everybody. i personally feel like i learned a great deal about the city, which is what i will take the most value from a personal level forever, really. i want to thank, in that regard, the staff, the consultants, the district attorneys that have worked with us. they have been a tremendous resource to us. i also think everybody in the community. i am amazed summon people have spent so much time, whether in our meetings or submitting it public comment or facebook, or what have you, it has been a very rich and critical source of information for all of us. i admire the dedication of ev

mr. mcdonnell: thank you. mr. alonso: did we add clinton heights -- clarington heights? not the whole thing? park merced? mr. mcdonnell: ok. we are not attempting to create an exhaustive list. this is one that does not need as a vacation. district 8. -- need justification. district 8. >> i would combine diamond heights. mr. mcdonnell: you would combine? >> just diamond heights. mr. mcdonnell: ok. mr. leigh: i would strike open house and lgbt community center. mr. mcdonnell: removing them from this list. any additions? mr. pilpel: i am looking at it. it is changing. >> i withdraw the comment. mr. mcdonnell: ok. so, we have -- can -- >> can i suggest eureka valley? ms. tidwell: i just deleted eureka valley. some of those are encompassed with what the other neighborhoods are. mr. pilpel: i don't think i agree with that. i think eureka valley is in district 8. >> adding eureka valley. mr. mcdonnell: there is no need to create an exhaustive list. mr. pilpel: ok. all right. mr. mcdonnell: any other additions? moving the

mr. mcdonnell: ok. mr. alonso: we did miss one thing for section 4. on district 9, we did put it north of the park in district 9. mr. mcdonnell: that is a point of fact. >> you're talking about district considerations. >> it is in the 11 write-up. are we putting them in twice? >> across all of them, we had -- >> my point is there is a bunch of redundancy. everything should show up in five. if it is stated once, the point is captured. are you satisfied -- >> it even says mclaren park south. it would make sense for the reader that mclaren park north would be included in the section. mr. mcdonnell: ok. sure. >> the web would resolve that is to put the text in the district where it ended up. that is just the way i would do it. mr. mcdonnell: thank you. we are resolved. ok. with that intro the city attorney just offered, what follows is -- how would you say it in court? >> exhibit a. mr. mcdonnell: recognized neighborhoods. that goes tehre as -- there as a replacement. the intro to those secti

mr. camp: mr. speaker, i urge passage of this legislation to strengthen trade and investment ties with africa and support well-paying jobs in the united states. the legislation also extends the president's authority to impose the import ban on products from berma for an additional three years and -- burma for an additional three years. the legislation has broad bipartisan support and is supported by all stakeholders. we have strengthened ties with subsaharan africa. the apparel industry has been a major goal. jobs in the textile and apparel industry have more than doubled. growing from 19,000 to 45,000 because of agoa. this bill extends the third country fabric provisions which are vital to ensuring the continued success of the agoa program and ensures the new republic of south sudan is eligible to benefit from agoa. under the trade agreement, trade has grown substantially and since the implementation of this agreement, the trade deficit the united states previously had with these countries has tur

mr. mcdonnell: that is correct. >> thank you. >> can i clarify something very quickly? mr. mcdonnell: there is no such thing as very quickly in this process. go ahead. >> west of twin peaks submission here, what we submitted was the planning neighborhood. it was not the council neighborhood boundaries. what is on here is actually correct. mr. mcdonnell: thank you. do you have an electronic document? ms. tidwell: it is a subset of what i included. maybe just for purposes of, we can move district by district. mr. mcdonnell: ok. we will get that information and insert that. can we move to section 6? anything else in section 5? we are going to insert -- we are going to insert the neighborhoods into this section of section 5 under each district with the deviation. comment? discussion? >> in section 5, that will only include those seven districts that are -- >> we decided to do the mall. >> ok. the header will appropriately reflect where districts deviate more than 1%, but we will list all 11 o

>> yes. >> mr. league? >> yes. -- mr. leeg -- leigh. >> yes. >> no. >> i will look at the deviations. >> thank you. >> can i make a comment while at the look at the numbers? >> sure. i think the pop lore initially had either ben the four blocks between two and five as a way to clean the lines. so since those are not submitted as part of a neighborhood, i would suggest we look there to the extent we still have a population issue. >> ok. >> mr. chair, we have the deviation. it is negative 4.997%. >> are you comfortable? >> i'm comfortable. >> thank you. thanks for that exercise. let's visit now the less again attempting to move fairly swiftly through each of these considerations. let's go to the question of d-60 border, at the same time we will secondarly visit the maria manner. >> i don't know where they are continue may affect it. if you can tell us where they are. >> sure. give us the other two. so we will look out -- so the next -- the next one is between districts 10 and 9. bart line we would align to. this is an area

mr. mcdonnell: thank you. mr. leigh: yes. mr. alonso: no. ms. tidwell: yes. >> i was going to make the same observation. parts of this are already there. it is augmenting it a little bit to get what is not there included. mr. pilpel: if we are not able to edit, i would not include it in this way. mr. mcdonnell: ok. thank you. ms. mondejar: included in the body of the report. maybe at the last sentence. -- edit the last sentence. mr. mcdonnell: your response but the break for editing. ok. thank you. on mr. pilpel's? everyone take a moment to read this suggestion. >> the question you're going to call is all or nothing? mr. mcdonnell: that is correct. mr. pilpel: -- mr. schreiber: no. ms. mondejar: the question is to include it all or not? um -- yes. ms. lam: no. ms. melara: no, because most of it is already included in the report and some of the things that were not, i think we did not vote on them. mr. leigh: i am going to say yes. on the whole, i think it is fine. i appreciate member pilpel's attempts to respond to the issues we had. ms. tidwell

mr. camp: mr. speaker, i rise today in support of h.r. 6169, the pathway to job creation through a simpler, fairer tax code. republicans and democrats voted to extend tax cuts until the end of next year. it provides congress a time to enact and pass comprehensive tax reform. without risking further damage to a fragile economy. the failure to stop the tax hike looming at the end of the year could push us over a jobs cliff. i know many democrats want to raise taxes but an independent study by ernst & young said it would eliminate over 700,000 jobs. we can't afford to lose more jobs in the united states and that is why we voted to extend current tax policy. instead of raising taxes on small businesses and making it harder to create jobs, as the democrat plan did, republicans are focused on creating jobs, reforming the tax code to make it simpler and fairer for all americans and strengthening our economy. the bill before us today provides a pathway to that goal. this bill forces congress to do its job.

mr. mcdonnell: ok. all right. that takes us to section 5. and the -- yes? >> can i propose some introductory language for the very beginning, to make clear what the findings are? i would propose something along the lines of, seven districts-1, 3, 5, 8, 9, and 11. mr. mcdonnell: ok. >> have population deviations between 1% and 5% of the statistical mean. these deviations were necessary to keep recognize neighborhoods intact in those districts and surrounding areas. >> [inaudible] [laughter] >> i can believe -- delete. mr. mcdonnell: ok. mr. alonso: we did miss one thing for section 4. on district 9, we did put it north of the park in district 9. mr. mcdonnell: that is a point of fact. >> you're talking about district considerations. >> it is in the 11 write-up. are we putting them in twice? >> across all of them, we had -- >> my point is there is a bunch of redundancy. everything should show up in five. if it is stated once, the point is captured. are you satisfied -- >> it even says mclar

mr. camp: mr. speaker, pursuant to house resolution 747, i call up the bill h.r. 8, the job prevention and recession prevention act of 2012, and ask for its immediate consideration. the speaker pro tempore: the clerk will report the title of the bill. the clerk: h.r. 8, a bill to extend certain tax relief provisions enacted in 2001 and 2002, and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to house resolution 747, the bill is considered as read. after one hour of debate on the bill it shall be in order to consider the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part b of house report 112- 641 if offered by the gentleman from michigan, mr. levin, or his designee, which shall be considered as read and shall be separately debatable, minutes controlled by the proponent and an opponent. the gentleman from michigan, mr. camp, and the gentleman from michigan, mr. levin, each will control 30 minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from michigan, mr. camp. mr. camp: mr. speaker, i ask un

mr. barton? >> mr.barton, i'm sorry. >> it's a friendly motion ordered do we need to take care of the other motion? >> is the secondary in order now in. >> yes. >> i would suggest activeactive pch it's no an erosion of. it's an attack on the constitution. >> i would agree to that terminology as well. [inaudible] and now rein the posture of resulted in an attack on the our constitution. so we actually have -- let's see mr. apartmenttarian we would need to do it as an amendment which would be and resulted in an attack on the constitution by requiring that all u.s. citizens purchase health insurance. that would be the elimination of your originaloriginnal mission of a "further erosion of our constitution." >> yes, madam chair. >> okay. let's go to the second degree amendment. the language is offered by mr. barton. is there a second to his language? >> second. >> okay. all in favor of accepting mr. barton's lang wog to amendment mrs. kennedy's amendment? say aye. >> aye. all opposed? we are now in the postu

mr. alanso, in or out? >> out. >> mr. leigh? >> out with the possibility -- i think this is the suggestion i would make just based on what madam clerk has said is that we have two sentences tend of this, one referring to the public file and one referring to the website and in the second sentence referring to the website, explicitly mention working map drafts as well as maps submitted by the public will be available 10 years on the website with the url. >> is it accurate then to infur that maybe you or others would like to see almost a table of contents-ish. why call the entirety of our proceedings will be on the website. is there a particular reason why you want to call out either the maps submitted by the public or draft maps as opposed to anything else, minutes, the agendas, the -- everything else that will be available. >> well, i think -- i guess where i would like to include reference to the public maps is just out of respect for the time that people spent in developing those maps and acknowledging that. >> ok. miss melara?

mr. mccain: mr. president, before we turn to my friend from illinois for his i'm sure convincing explanation as to why these -- a special counsel is not required, even though it was in the opinion of his side in previous situations, i want to just again, and the senator from georgia and the senator from south carolina will also corroborate the fact that we have been working and working, meeting after meeting after meeting on the issue of cybersecurity. we believe that we have narrowed it down to three or four differences that could be worked out over time. among them are liability, another one is information sharing. but i think it's also important for us to recognize in this debate the people who are most directly affected in many respects is the business community. and it's important that we have the input and the -- satisfy at least to a significant degree, those concerns. there are those who allege that a piece of legislation is better than no legislation. i've been around this town for a long ti

>> mr. kobach, would you be kind enough to repeat it? >> mr. kobach has been recognized to state his amendment. >> the word voting should be struck and replaced with delivery of ballots. >> okay. so on your sheet, and it's on the screen, strike voting and insert after electronic delivery of balance. >> there's been a second to the. secondary amendment. any discussion? on that clarifying amendment. hearing none, all in favor say aye ago. all of those? that amendment is adopted. we are now back to the main amendment it as amended i mr. kobach. any discussion on that amendment? all right. it's already been seconded. all in favor of the amendment as amended by mr. kobach they aye. all oppose say no. that amendment is agreed to. and i believe that's it for the voters. is there anything else in the voter section? okay, we are going to leave that section open. >> mr. chairman, if i can enter a? >> we will leave that section open up until -- you haven't worked out? >> i believe so, sir. i just wonde

excuse me, mr.-- so, mr. brashov-- what i was trying to-- i was going to ask-- i can cook many excellent desserts, but this is one of my specialties. - would you like to try some ? - that will not be necessary. i need a cook, not someone who can start fires. i ay y despues de tanto trabajo ! i este tipo no sabe nada ! i nada de cocina y despues me culpa a mi ! can everybody please get back to work ? thank you ! so, mr. brashov, what i was trying to tell you-- wait ! - i like it. - you do ? - yes, it's delicious ! - thank you. - it was my favorite when i was growing up. - can you cook anything else ? yes ! i can cook dishes from all over the world. sweet and sour meat balls-- if you can cook without burning down the restaurant, you can cook for brashov ! thank you, mr. brashov ! you won't be sorry. excuse me. - i hope you have fire insurance. - i hope i have a chef. did i mention that i worked at mario's italian restaurant ? ohh ! terrific spaghetti there. - yes ! absolutely ! - it's too bad they closed down t

>> mr. chairman? >> mr. kobach. >> mr. chairman, may i offer what may be considered a technical change? i think what the gentlelady from washington means is not vote by mail because that would encompass absentee ballots, i think she means all hyphen length mail. it's terminology, but it's important because not all ballots cast by mail are problem problematic. i think that's what she means if she could indicate so. >> yes, that's exactly what i mean, the states that are completely vote by mail. where they have adopted no physical casting of ballots. >> the change is being made on the screen. please, make sure it reflects what you wanted, ms. dye. >> all right. is there a second of that clarifying amendment? >> second. >> it's moved and seconded that that clarifying amendment of mr. kobach be adopted. all in favor, aye. >> are aye. >> all opposed, no? we're back to the amended amendment of ms. dye on vote by mail for, essentially, only those states that are all-mail elections -- how many are there, do we know, counsel? two?

so mr. curren was angry. yes, very angr you'd seen mr. rren angry before hadn't you, mrs. greeneld? yes, i have. i didn like it then, either. when theursing home moved his mother to another room he was sometimes late paying her bill. he got very gry at the director, didn't he? i remember. did he kill the director? no. of course no thank you. how did mr. curren sound during his phone calls to mr. kopinsky thday of the murder? he was definitely upset. did he raise his voice? he said my bos was a crook and i was to why were you a crook? i don't know. he was upset. what else did he say? he said he wted to know what stop we were on the broadway r.t. ( clearing thrt ) did you receiv any other angry phone calls for mr. kopinsky that day? therwas always somebody upset about something. you'd heard other clients call mr.opinsky a crook, hadn't you? he cut some corns. in aeek, how many angry phone calls would mr. kopinsky recve? maybe a dozen. two or three ary phone calls a day. oh, yeahat least that. miss huntley, your compa empire gifts, was being sued by arthur kopinsky? yes, on behalf of a

mr. olson: mr. speaker, i ask unanimous consent that all members have five legislative days to revise and extend their rashes and insert extraneous materials into the record on h.r. 4273. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. mr. olson: i yield myself such time as i may consume. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. olson: mr. speaker, i rise today in support of h.r. 4273, resolving liability conflicts act of 2012. my colleagues and i carefully drafted this bill to resolve a con nict between the federal power act and environmental laws and regulations that if left unresolved could create serious problems for liability in our nation's electric grid. every year, as the heat of summer settles in across our country and demand surnls for electricity, the potential for dangerous power outages grows. some states such as california and my home state of texas, are being warned by electricity regulators that reserve margins could dip dangerously low. texas is expecting a 2 50rks0 meg

mr. dold: mr. speaker, i rise today to recognize roselyn franklin school of medicine for 100 years of educating and training physicians and health care providers. since they opened their doors in 1912, roselyn franklin has had a nondiscrimination policy in place and has embraced the diverse student body. these students have gone on to treat patients throughout the world and contribute to vital research. at roselyn franklin university of medicine and science they focus on education where students are encouraged to learn and share experiences with members of the health care team outside of their chosen profession. this provides a strong foundation for graduates of the program and enriches their clinical practice. the president, dr. michael welch, has received numerous accolades for his leadership, including winning the 10th district congressional leadership award for education this year. i want to congratulate roselyn franklin university of medicine and science for an impressive 100 years of educatin

mr. mcdonnell: thank you. mr. alonso: or perhaps we could have john did a press conference on his own, provided he has time, since he is not an official member of the task force. mr. mcdonnell: okay, and obviously we would have to explore that with him. we cannot commit him at this moment. atmr. lee: i do think it is important, in whatever way, to get the word out quickly, based on the same issues that member pilpel reyes, there are a number of implications that will move quis in our interest and the city's interest for people to know what they're voting, when they did not expect to be voting, and vice versa, not to mention all of the other political activity. i think a press conference would be good. i am find myself with not attending the press conference, but i think we need to do whatever we can to spread the word quickly and widely. ms. mondejar: i'm not really sure bridget ms. melara: i agree this information has to get out to the media and as many people as possible, as soon as possible. by tomorrow, this w

mr. scott: mr. speaker, i yield myself such time as i may consume. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. scott: thank you, mr. speaker. i rise today to encourage all my colleagues to vote in favor of h.r. 2446, the respa home warranty clarification act. but before i explain exactly why this legislation is so important and vital, let me first take a moment to thank my friend and colleague and my fellow financial service committee member and the sponsor of this legislation, mrs. biggert, for her hard work on this bill. the fact that this bill passed both subcommittee and full committee by voice vote is a testament to not only the issues important -- issue's importance but also to mrs. biggert's dedication and openness in alleviating members' concerns. regarding the bill itself, mr. speaker, this legislation will help small businesses. it will help real estate professionals. and most importantly, it will help homeowners by clarifying the law on the sale of home warranties. congress

mr. akin, he took to the air waves trying mightily to apologize. >> let me be clear. r rape is never legitimate. it's an evil act committed by violent predators, i used the wrong words in the wrong way. >> but listen further as mr. akin struggles to say just what he meant by those ridiculous words. >> what did you mean by legitimate rape? were you attempting to say forcible rape? >> yeah, i was talking about forcible rape and it was absolutely the wrong word. yeah. >> and regarding mr. akin's scientifically challenged remarks, that's where the rubber meets the road because last year, akin joined with none other than paul ryan to sponsor anti-choice legislation that introduced the bizarre term, forcible rape, an effort to narrow the definition and limit funding for victims seeking an abortion. so while mitt romney was agast today saying -- we haven't heard much from mr. ryan, have we? that's because he and mr. akin have been partners in their effort to exclude acts of rape that involve the

so mr. leigh, would you like to have considered your rather lessons learned considered to become no longer a single submission of your own but to be blended into the larger body of the report? >> i think basically the answer -- my answer is yes. to the extent the task force agrees with this, i would actually love to have it be supported or this notion be supported by the task force of the hole. i have one small concern which i can hold on to. if at the end of the discussion we only have three, i guess we're going to have four with member tidwell. but let's say depending how this discussion concludes, if we have only one or two, it wouldn't bother me as much. but if we only had one member that was captured in sort of in the context of individual members, recommendations and lessons learned, i think it could be awkward for the report. it doesn't bother me a whole lot. i could live with it. but it could little a little odd . >> so the answer is yes, and in a moment we'll go back to the top on t

mr. reid: mr. president? the presiding officer: the majority leader. mr. reid: i ask unanimous consent the call of the quorum be terminated. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. reid: i believe we are now on a motion to proceed to s. 3457, is that correct? the presiding officer: that's correct. mr. reid: i have a cloture motion at the desk i ask to have reported. the presiding officer: the clerk will report. the clerk: we the undersigned senators in accordance with the provisions of rule 22 of the standing rules of the senate hereby move to bring to a close the debate on the motion to proceed to calendar number 3476, a bill to require the secretary of veterans affairs to establish a veterans job corps, and for other purposes. signed by 17 senators as follows -- reid of nevada, kerry, sanders, conrad, franken, udall of new mexico, coons, begich, murray, nelson of florida, klobuchar, carper, menendez, webb, gillibrand, merkley and reed of rie. mr. reid: mr. president, i ask unanimous consent

>> mr. chairman? >> mr. chairman? >> let me get to folks i haven't heard from yet. >> guy short from colorado? >> mr. short. >> would you change the word "clips" to magazines? >> that was my -- >> all right, mr. kobach. >> that's fine. or we could use clips or magazines. the gun officionados in the room may disagree as to what those terms refer to, but i would say clips or magazines. >> okay. are you saying the amendment to strike clip and insert magazine? >> he's wanted to add it. >> mr. kobach? >> i was suggesting to replace, but mr. kobach suggested that we just do clips or magazines which is acceptable to me. >> mr. kobach, state your amendment. >> i've agreed to the friendly amendment that changes the phrase "capacity of clips" to "capacity of clips or magazines." >> and is there a second to that amendment? >> second. >> so moved and seconded. that amendment be agreed to. any discussion on that amendment? all this favor of that amendment say aye. >> aye. >> all opposed? that amendment is agreed to and i

mrs. murray: mr. president? the presiding officer: the senator from washington. mrs. murray: i object, mr. president. the presiding officer: objection is heard. mrs. murray: mr. president? the presiding officer: the senator from washington. mrs. murray: mr. president, i have listeninged carefully to the passion from the senator from ohio -- iowa on behalf of the republican majority and sparke speaker boehner, and frankly i have to say that it is offensive to say that the issue of violence against women is about politics. this is about women who are abused, women who are powerless to fight back, women being able to get the protections that they need in this country that has provided protection for a very long time to make sure that women who are immigrants, women who live on a -- in a tribe, women who are gay and lesbian, women who are on college campuses get the protections they support. this is not about politics. this is about violence, and this country stand -- to stand up and say we're going to pr

mr. coons: mr. president, i rise today to speak both in favor of passage of the bill and to speak against the coburn amendment. i first want to thank leaders reid and mcconnell, senator mcconnelmcconnell, as well as ss for find weighing to work together and this bill. i say with some regret that i stand to speak against the coburn amendment because i respect and recognize senator coburn's determination to hold this body accountable, to find pathways forward to deal with our record deficit and debt. and in that broader objective, i look forward to working with him on finding responsible pay-fors in future bills and in finding ways that we can steadily partner to reduce the deficit and to find and root out waste and abuse in federal spending. but i have to say that in this particular case on this amendment on this day, if we change the pay-for, we kill the bill. we have heard clearly from republican chairman of the house ways and means committee camp and from his rank minority, congressman levin, that

mr. collier represents the clinic at this point in time, and other than requesting after these many, many years we finally move on and allow my client to continue to run his hotel and to seek a conditional- use authorization to extend the operation of the hotel as is stipulated to an agreed to, i would ask that you adopt the stipulated decision, and if you have any questions for me, i am happy to answer any questions you have. president hwang: mr. collier, would you like to speak? >> good evening, members of the board. my name is steve collier, tenderloin housing clinic staff attorney. yes, we have agreed and stipulated to the findings and determination that are presently before you. the matter should be decided by the planning commission to see if they will approve a conditional use. i think that is where the issue is better set, and that is why we agreed to the stipulation. president hwang: thank you. director goldstein: mr. sanchez? >> thank you. good afternoon, president hwang, commis

mr. denim. >> thank you. certainly it's frustrating to have yet one more hearing on some of the frauds and waste that's happening in gsa. the agency that is supposed to be tasked with setting an example, setting the standard for every other agency. after the las vegas celebration that they had, you would have thought that things would have changed. yet we see conference after conference and not just conferences, we found out now that rather than call them as conferences, they call them as celebrations so they can get around the executive order of calling it a conference. we see the outrageous bonuses that aren't just performance bonuses which are bad enough which under an executive order were supposed to be stopped and we find out there's not only performances bonuses but tier bonus bonuses. there are special act bonuses. there are huge overtime payments, employees department heads receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional pay. this was supposed to be hearing focused on yet

mr. tangerlini and he had a family issue. we requested the administrator and she was involved in the question that's under investigation. so she is not coming. we invited the chief of staff. he's not coming. then we invited -- what's his last name? federal acquisitions services. i guess he was pretty heavily involved in this, the virginia conference, and i believe he took a leave of absce from the event. did he take a leave of absence last week? >> i believe he's on medical leave. >> okay. >> and then we got further down the public building's administrator couldn't come. so we got down to you. and we appreciate your being here. but it's getting diffict to find anyone who hasn't been involved in these scandals to now come and testify. and i know, mr. miller, you have ongoing investigations now we identified 77 conferences with at least 25 attendees and $10,000 cost. is that correct? are you aware of this? >> that's correct, mr. chairman. >> many of them are smaller amounts. but we have som