mr. braude: how about those votes, congressman? rep. capuano: i have no memory of voting for the hyde amendment, and if i did, every democratic woman -- and i did not vote in the committee when the aca was done, we only had votes on the floor. we did have to vote for certain things we did not like because it was a big bill. but remember, no republicans voted for it and the only people who voted for a bill that extended health insurance to 20 million people were democrats. we had to stay unified or it would not have happened. ms. pressley: what i am saying is that i will sit at the table and compromise and work with anyone in the name of progress, but there are things i am unwilling to negotiate on. that is the rights of women, immigrants, of workers and , lgbtqia community. perfection should not be the enemy of good, but the fact remains -- this was publicly reported during the senate debate -- that while that was being deliberated upon, that you would have extended the hyde amendment, which would have limited access to low income women

my question mr how do you analyze such terrorist attacks from them to legends point of view which inside afghanistan all round the world in you and that disturbed countries of. this book you this is well what do you do inside because it would have taken very little expertise to detect that these guys had nothing to do and a five star hotel we talked with them why and the state that india sport you can read in just the handles of the case of someone and they will investigate it. book you have been just a leading indias for one time as during any enough procedure of investigative procedure at the india is to lead such incidents to justice yes. but still we can see that such a case particularly sometimes care is case has not led to jest and you are right i don't know what. more do you think america passage of time they'd think kills a kid's. passage of time house killed thousands of kids. if we don't have access to evidence and evidence the most crucial piece of evidence is the c.c.t.v. coverage do you think that investigation is competent enough to where someone knows the answer to that i

mrs. kennedy, how she -- -- also, mrs. kennedy, of course, but mrs. johnson, how she presided over the white house and mrs. bush, who loves the outdoors and loves flowers and plants and natural landscape and the national parks, always looked to mrs. johnson as an example of, you know, someone who so appreciated our natural beauty. and mrs. bush would say, would look at mrs. johnson and say, oh, she loved flowers. but really what she was was our nation's first conservationist first lady. so i think that her presence and one of the personal recollections i have of mrs. johnson, which is seared in my memory for the rest of my life is linda johnson rob, who we all heard from last night, of course, on the descendants panel, but linda had called me when i was chief of staff to mrs. bush and said, i'm bringing my mother back to washington for what i know will be her last time. to see some of her friends, of course, she had a stroke, she wasn't speaking, she was in a wheelchair, but she was still very vibrant. and she said, do you think we can come to the whit

. >> i just am wondering how many of these people do you think are sympathetic to mr. nixon? we don't know how many coming in, but we hope they all will be going out. >> oh, yes, i have complete faith in him. i think he is the man for us today. i think he will do it this time. >> do you judge a man by his handshake? >> no. no. by his past actions. >> i whe was very, very sincere very warm, very nice. it was a pleasure. >> i think he's a very well lauded person. he is appealing more and more to the younger generation and to more people, which is most important part. >> i feel anyone is better than johnson. >> i think he's improved. >> there you are. there's three. how is that? >> thank you. >> all right. >> how are you doing? are you a friend of dave? >> a friend of nixon. all the way. >> tell me is this fellow a good chairman up here? >> a darn good fella. >> you really think so? >> i really think so. he is a good guy. >> all right. good. well, as a matter of fact, that's what we hear. we've got a lot of people said, well, he is too young to be chairman and i said, well, we n

mrs. johnson how she presided over the white house. she loved the outdoors and loved flowers and plants and natural landscapes and the national parks. she's so appreciated the natural beauty. mrs. bush would say people would look at mrs. johnson and would say she loved flowers. she was our nations first convert -- conservationist first lady. her presence and when recollection i have of mrs. johnson which is seared in my memory, she had called me when i was chief of staff to mrs. bush and said, i'm bringing my mother to washington for what i know will be her last time. she wants to see her friends. she had had a stroke. she was not speaking and was in a wheelchair. she was still vibrant. she said, do you think we could come to the white house? i knew laura bush is reaction would be of course. i never answer for anything without talking to her first but i knew the answer would be yes. i will call you back with dates and times that could work. mrs. bush was so thrilled to have mrs. johnson come to the white house that she can take the form

my question mr how do you analyze such terrorist attacks from them to logis point of view which happens inside afghanistan around the world in you and tell us that a statue in the countries of. this book do this and what what what do you do inside because it would have taken very little expertise to detect that these guys had nothing to do and a five star hotel we talked with them why and the state that india's support you can read in just the handles of the case of someone and they will investigate it. book you have been just a leading indias for one time as juror any enough procedure of investigative procedure at the indias to lead such incidents to justice yes. but still we can see that such a case particularly some of those cares case that has not led to jest and you are right i don't know what. more do you think america passage of time they'd think kills a kid's. passage of time house killed thousands of kids. if we don't have access to evidence and evidence the most crucial piece of evidence is the c.c.t.v. coverage do you think that investigation is competent enough to where some

mr. nixon. how do you feel about that? i've got less hair than i had before, you know the hairline goes back a bit here and there. and of course i'm older, i'm 55, which is of course seven years older than i was when i ran before in 1960. and of course i'm more experienced, i know more, i won't make as many mistakes as i might have made, had i been elected in 1960. of course others discovered that i perhaps had a sense of humor, which i think i've always had. but perhaps people didn't see it. others discovered other things that they seem to find for the first time. let me just answer it this way. of course, i have changed. but also perhaps the people who are looking at me have changed also. they're looking for new leadership in this country and they're taking a fresh look at what i may have to offer. and i of course am presenting a new case that i was unable to present and did not present in 1960. to that extent, yes, i am new. but in another sense, i'm not. i'm, i'm really the most difficult man in the world when it comes

[laughter] >> i was just wondering how long tr lived after quentin died. mr. pietrusza: the question -- how long did tr live after quentin died? does in 1918. tr guys the night of january 5 through 6. he dies early on in the morning of the 6th, 1919. he doesn't live very long. many say the boy went out of tr at that point, as one would imagine. he is very saddened by that. and his health is terrible. 1918 is a real horrible year for him. he spends most of february in roosevelt hospital on manhattan's west side. then he goes into the hospital again on armistice day november , 11, and does not come out until christmas eve, 1918. the last year of his life, he is in the hospital for a good 2.5 months. he is a mess. even being a mess, because i think tr is considered to be so indestructible. you could shoot him and he still gives a talk for an hour and a half. he can go to the amazon and that will not kill him. charge up san juan hill. people think he is indestructible, but he's not, and his heart is broken. yes? >> you said quentin couldn't see beyond the end of hi

mr. vice president. >> how are you, mr. mayor? >> reporter: featured georgetown's mayor in one of his climate documentaries. >> market forces are moving the entire energy marketplace toward renewable energy. i'm hoping they'll follow the lead of dale ross rather than donald trump. >> reporter: renewable energy has continued growing since trump's election. even in texas, the conservative home of trump's energy secretary. >> so even though rick perry is the energy secretary for president trump, who's all about coal, he was in some ways a visionary on wind. >> he was. and without his leadership we wouldn't be having renewable energy here. now, he's shying away from that, and i need to be his pr guy, but your digestive system has billions of bacteria but life can throw them off balance. re-align yourself with align probiotic. and try new align gummies with prebiotics and probiotics to help support digestive health. dove gives you so you can wear anything.ms from athletic tops to zebra dresses, and everything in between. enjoy 48 hour

mr. mcgahn testified to. i can figure it out. >> how do you say that, good sense? have you debriefed him? >> no, no. but mr. dowd has a good sense of it. he talked to them at the time. >> the times reports that rudy giuliani refused to follow trump's orders on television yesterday. the article sent out of a scramble on saturday. the president sequestered at his private golf club and solicited opinions on the possible repercussions from the article. the president ordered giuliani to tell reporters that the article was wrong, but mr. giuliani did not go that far in his appearances. don mcgahn ignored questions about this weekend's reports. >> why did you wait so long to speak to special counsel? >> did you confide because you thought the president would deter you? >> do you regret that decision? >> and like clock work, when the news media reveals details of the mueller investigation that disturb the president, the president's tweeting becomes even more hysterical. this morning the president tweeted these lies about special prosecutor robert mueller and his staff spent over 30 hours with the white house counse

mr. mueller given how the story changes from one moment to the next. watching mr. giuliani saying how do we know she was russian? she had a russian name. something as simple as that. he is providing information that can create additional material that can be used to get mr. trump to double talk, triple talk and quadruple talk. >> this story was really about trying to drive some wedge between the president and his lawyer. it was talking about the strained relationship they had which isn't true. i was a governor's lawyer in pennsylvania. you always going to have disagreements with your client. it seems that is what they were trying to portray here and it kind of blew up on him a little bit. the president came out through sarah huckabee sanders and supported don mcgahn and talked about the great things on regulatory reform, judges and a real high profile matter that don mcgahn is working on. that is the next supreme court justice. it shouldn't be lost on anyone that this is breaking now trying to drive the wedge and drive a problem where don mcgahn is doing a very good

mr. pruitt and the range of environmental policies that are far more consequential. how we deal with significant damage that mr. pruitt has done to the epa. will the american public be able to trust the epa in its mission to protect public health and the environment? i believe in giving credit where credit is due. the few weeks that mr. wheeler has been the acting administered , he has published conferences on his calendar on a daily basis. he has opened up the epa to work to ensure that the beleaguered crew staff once again feels valued, respected, and included. he withdrew mr. pruitt's parting act to stop enforcing air emissions standards for some of the dirtiest heavy-duty trucks on the road under the clear act, granting one company permission to continue building glider trucks for two years. thank you for that. there is a whole lot more to be done. mr. wheeler has told me repeatedly that he shares my bull and striking a deal between automakers and and states on fuel economy and tailpipe standards. unfortunately, the administration's proposal could not be further from

mrs. feldmann: how do you explain the omarosa situation? mr. lewandowski: i've never worked with her. she was not part of the campaign was i was there. i wasn't with her on the transition. i didn't work in the white house. when you have with her is a person who has decided to look there are two models when you work for the government and you decide to leave. is,can use the model which your going to continue to support your previous boss and write a book and talk about your experience and the opportunities that they gave you. in a relatively honest, intellectual way. or, you can write a book they want to sell books on. omarosa has chosen to write that book. book, thatd theory was exceptionally successful from a monetary position. omarosa has decided that for her, she has made a strategic decision that was better for her to say things that seem to be unfounded or unverified on a number of occasions to promote her book, and give her an opportunity to continue to have a form in the mainstream media. she has been able to do that. mrs. feldmann: i have to ask you about the president's langu

. >> listen, in the signing of this campaign, a lot of things have been said about mr nixon. how about that? >> of course, i am older. i am 55, which is older than when i ran before. which was 60. and of course, i am more experience. i know more. i will make as many mistakes as it might've made when i was elected 1960. of course, i have a better sense of humor, which i think i've always had. others discover other things that they seem to find for the first time. let me to say this way. of course, i have changed, but perhaps the people who are looking at me have changed also. they're looking for a new leadership in this country. they are taking a fresh look at what we have to offer. i'm presenting a new case that i did not resent 1960s. in another sense, i'm not new. i am really the most difficult man of the world when it comes to a so-called public relations firm. nobody is going to package me. nobody is going to make me go in and ask for television. i'm not going to engage in any gimmicks already stunts. or do something with the perfect of getting a publicity picture. i am not a

within this time and time again around the world most acutely in most brutally in the mr. how does this happen? one member of a cuter member peer to .2 billion. the most important thing you have to remember about facebook. as if every 20 team facebook had to .2 billion users around the world. there is nothing that comes close. bbc doesn't have that many listeners around the world. cnn international doesn't have that many viewers around the world. that is a stunning number. at that scale there is almost nothing facebook can do to alleviate the problems i've heard it described. it's almost impossible to affect delay filter out all of the garbage out of a system that is to .2 billion humans regularly contributing garbage and some puppies to it. it's a really unmanageable system at that scale. two other aspect of facebook are important to remember. the advertising system that accurately and inexpensively targets to just the right audience and nobody else beyond it. the laser pointing has tremendous possibilities in the world of propaganda. it is great for selling shares. it terrib

mrs. feldmann: how do you explain the omarosa situation? she's been with him a long time. mr lewandowski: to be clear i've never worked with omarosa. so she was not part of the campaign when i was there. she wasn't part of the team. i wasn't with her on the transition, and i didn't work in the white house. i think what you have with omarosa is a person who has decided to look at, look there's two models when you work for the government and you decide to leave. you can use the model, which is you're going to continue to support your previous boss and write a book and talk about your experience and opportunities that they gave you in a relatively honest, intellectual integrity way, or you can write a book that you want to sell books on. and i think omarosa has chosen to write the latter book, which is the "fire and fury" book which michael wolf wrote was exceptionally successful from a monetary standpoint. much more successful than my book, unfortunately. omarosa has decided that for her, i think she's made the strategic decision that it was better for her to go out and say t

how do you make sure people are advocating professionally? mr. mcaleenan: i think we have greatly enhanced the background process. it is also before we settled and expanded the office of professional responsibility. we had a bipartisan panel take a our professional responsibility and integrity and accountability process. we have implemented a vast majority of their recommendations already. our background process is as good as any of the federal government. we feel confident the people bringing -- we are bringing in will succeed as agents. mrs. brown: we talked about asylum-seekers and their capacity issues. have you looked at surging additional personnel? bringing people from other agencies if you can send asylum officers to the point of entry entry to setrts of up. megan: -- mr. mcaleenan: if we are getting successful about 80% arrivals of between ports. we do want to respond with additional resources. i mentioned the hiring initiatives for officers. two of the top ports of the top two ports for hiring. we are aggressively trying to hire for tho

up rough how to get up with a bit of bitten albums i'll bet a station have the full hello quality affordable mr didden she leash now no other mocking rude remark and also what is the whole matter if you don't want to work on well lack and how that could be full on looking for love so beautiful i'm all i could not but i've learned a lot of. feeling down right sam and to know who you and i am and caring and i am in that moment i know entertainment and the telephone who confided that you minister for you decide whether. to send us o.t. our luck to our so sort or so i don't really like that and received an f. the last half of last resort not a measure so one of them again. i know who. live there are all or can be shy and yemen so i know a. fair local allam who are simply want this to help or that hire back then had to learn how to win some said i'm here or not. thought out. but i theater bad in sound was out of. a lot of them. if you are. who do yes. it is a menace loopback that at. best for us so they let me die or to no more access to. those who love us a look loved their long mission every vet h

it was beautiful how mr. clinton talked about how he described what embodied here. she lived with courage, not without fears, but overcoming her fears. she lived with faith, overcoming her failures. then he also talked about her generosity, how she would take the time to express care for other people, people who others may not think are that important. in her autobiography, she would write about gospel and soul singers that most people wouldn't know of and how she made other people feel. that really was a calling card for her. i spoke with a ghost writer of her first biography. he said she was a very guarded person, actually. it spoke to her independence from a very early age. that song "respect" says so much about her. "natural woman", written by carol king says so much about aretha franklin. the impressions and imprints she made not just on gospel music, all genres of music, civil rights movement, women's rights. she did it all. they are celebrating her in that kind of tapestry today, in this church. the varied audience, the varied lineup of those we have heard fr

mr. johnson: how, ray tell, are you thinking about what that point might look like? justice breyer: no. mr. johnson: oh, come on. [applause] mr. johnson: i think it's easy for you to say no. but there are a lot of americans right now were deeply concerned about the direction of the country. the supreme court is something we have no power over. we can't touch that. i think it means a lot to people who look to you as an exemplar of the law to know that you are there or to know that you are leaving, to give them confidence in what is going on with the courts. we don't have any power over the supreme court. for those americans who look at the court as an untouchable structure, wondering what that is like, who is he in there. what would you say to them about your role on the court? justice breyer: i will do my job as long as i think i can do it properly. [applause] i got a question this form. you are much more polite. gaga?ll i know when i go it may be time to think about stepping down. i think brandeis or somebody said -- i can't remember the name. said, you remember the day you the justice

intense schedule, finding that moment to reach out to an individual to let him know how much he was valued as an american. so, mr. president, i rise to speak briefly, and i started by saying i am probably among the least qualified. but perhaps because of my brief interaction and the quality of the interaction and the intensity of how john mccain presented himself not just to me, not just to his fellow american but to all the voters of louisiana, i might be the best qualified, the best qualified because even in that glimpse you see that which made john mccain a great american, bringing it all, all the time, for everybody who lives in this country to represent this country as best as possibly to the rest of the world and in so doing served not just our country but the rest of the world. thank you, mr. president. and i yield the floor. a senator: mr. president? the presiding officer: the senator from rhode island. mr. reed: thank you, mr. president. mr. president, i rise today to honor our late colleague and friend, senator john mccain. i want to begin by offering my deepest sympathies to john's loving wife cindy,

mr. braude: how much do race and gender matter to voters on september 4? know you have said you don't like identity politics, i am not asking about that. we all know it is a majority, minority district. should it matter to them? should the issues be where people stand on the issues, leadership, vision. how much it should race and gender matter, counselor? ms. pressley: i will leave that up to the electorate. i do believe government cannot be formed by the people if all the people are not represented. i am running because i believe these times require bold, activist leadership and a leader that will restore hope, redeem the relationship with government, extend the hand of partnership, and be a mobilizer. that is what is necessary. that is why we were able to protect the aca, because they work with people to mobilize. i am running because i believe i provide bold, activist leadership. this is what i have done on the boston city council. to govern with community. i believe solutions exist in the community and i want to be a partner. mr. braude: congressman, y

are here in geneva and i would like to know what's your administration the prison the trumpet mr asian how you look at this importance of geneva the u.n. the here. stand you still don't have the need to do you need ambassador here in the mission u.s. mission why is it so and maybe just a few words regarding late kofi annan just past the way you used to be confronting him in the past and would be glad to have a few words for from your. well look it's sad for. coffee and family and friends and the u.n. community and. we obviously mourn his his passing. on the u.n. agencies in geneva you know i've been to geneva at least a million times in my diplomatic career so i've worked with all the agencies here it's a continuing us. priority to make the u.n. more effective to see its operations conducted in a more efficient way to see the agencies stick to their respective mandates. and to cooperate within the u.n. system to avoid duplication and overlap and a lot of that activity a lot of the budget authority is obviously centered here in geneva so it's it remains a very high priority there there are

data from how they comply with the law. mr. pruitt miscount banned any scientist who had received epa grant funding from serving on the scientific advisory committees. he proposed to have epa ignore and not consider some of the best scientific studies in the world. it is my sincere hope that mr. wheeler will share his plans for epa's war on science. disappointingly, there is no aspect of epa's inflammation of the toxic substance control act that will not be litigated. mr. pruitt's epa chose to blatantly disregard of the unambiguous law we wrote on this committee, which congress past with unanimous support. this disregard for the rule of law needs to end here. mr. wheeler needs to describe how he plans to stop wasting taxpayer funds and epa lawyers' time defending proposals that are clearly illegal and restore the agency to one that respects the rule of law and is guided by science. after mr. pruitt resigned, i sent mr. wheeler a letter and told him, "you have been granted an alarmist challenge and responsibility, but it even g

and see how does mr smith know you've experienced it all firsthand or you rescued shipwrecked africa with a german ship captain on a more in two thousand and four and in italy they arrested you as a human traffic are just that still pain you today it's hard to in on all. of this stuff has it's own you know the fact that motivates you to carry on fighting like and say injustices in the world he was off of it. as it was it's not as if i'm. especially angry with the italian most brutal been vikas they were actually all on my side we realized that in prison it was just italian government that has gotten worse and the murder of all. back then you wanted to help but you were charged with a serious and organized aiding and abetting of illegal entry you were facing four years in prison when the trial lasted for five years how did you cope with that it can't have been easy for us to make a little money for life i know i can't say it was but it's made me what i am today it's good now i know exactly what i wants and i work with all the energy i have in the flood i'm a little bit older to find t

that's what a lot of these officials are trying to reconcile in their own minds how much they can stay and be governs on mr. trump's behavior and how much they cannot countenance at all. people like john kelly, chief of staff, who i know and respect and like so much. john and i worked very close together. i am sure he is trying to keep mr. trump from doing awful terrible things. but at some point these senior officials have to ask themselves are they enabling this continued abusive and reckless behavior or not. and if they feel as though they are enabling it and they are not having that type of governing influence on it, i think they have to show their displeasure and unhappiness and leave. >> have you heard from gina haspel since this happened or director coates? >> i have not heard from anybody in the government since this happened. i have heard from a number of former colleagues and friends expressing their support, but i was not notified before this happened by anybody in the government. i have not heard from anybody since then. to me that's not surprising the way this white house, this administration

. >> when you listened to the part you heard, how many times did you hear mr. trump, your former boss, how many times did you hear him use the n word. >> multiple times. what's upsetting,s it bout someone on the set with me. >> jackson, ass businen, on the first season of the "apprentice" dlipd to comment taking a hard passn all things omarosa. the former reality star going into more details about what was allegedly said with that savannah. >> you actually heard the tape. >> absolutely. >> how long is the tape. >> there are multiple tapes. >> you have sincehe book closed. >> since i hrd it self. >> how long is the tape. >> about three minutes. >> oddey or vide camer outtakes. >> it's audio. >> manigault-newman dangling possibilityf more secretly recordedtapes. >> i have plenty. >> leaving the door open to the sp >> anything mueller would like to see, robert mueller. >> if his office calls again, anything they want, i'll share. >> reporter: it's the latest in manigault-newman's scorched earth book tour prompting mr. trump to lash out on twitter earlier in the day

mr. mcgahn laid out how mr.rump tried to ensure control of the investigation, giving investigators a mix of information, both potentially damaging and favorable to the president. what do you make of that, glenn? is it enough of a case for obstruction? how solid does obstruction have to be before you can bring a charge like that? >> alex, no one piece of the puzzle alone proves obstruction, but i have to tell you, as we continue to get more pieces of the puzzle, every piece tends to fit together with every other piece. as a career prosecutor for over 30 years, i wish i had evidence supporting a conspiracy or obstruction charge as i have seen simply reported in the public record here. we can't reach any conclusions yet, but i'll tell you, the evidence of conspiracy and obstruction from this career prosecutor's perspective is really becoming overwhelming. >> okay. let's look at the paul manafort trial. the jury has gone into deliberations both thursday and friday without reaching a verdict. now, they come back tomo

mr. mcgahn testified to. i can figure it out from -- >> how do you say that good sense? have you debriefedno him? >> no. t mr. dowd has a good sense of it. talked to them at the time. >> so you't dnow what he testified to, to mr. mueller? >> i think that through john dowd we have a pretty good sense of it. john dowai yesterday i'll use his words rather than i mean, that mcgahn was a strong witness for the president. so i don't need to more about that. also, they don't need to know what the president is going to say besiuse the pnt has said it. and we've told them that we would stipulate what the president has said is the president's true belief that he did nothing wrong, that he wasn't involved in collusion, that he wasn't involved inct obstn. they have yet to pro pound a reestion to us, give us a question where ts not an answer to it already by the president of the united states. so the only reason they couldss ly want the president of the united states is because they are desperate for somend of charge they can hang their hat on. they don't have collusion or ns racy, as brennan pointed out, and they --

mr. don mcgahn later how mr. trump tried to ensure control the investigation giving investigators a mix of information potentially damaging and favorable to the present pretty never saw mr. trump go beyond the legal authorities although the limits of executive power are murky says the times. so what does it mean if don mcgahn spends 30 hours talking about how the president is raging against the russian probe, how he does not like jeff sessions and is angry at jeff sessions for recusing himself, etc. but quote - he never saw mr. trump go beyond his legal authorities. which one would presume would mean he never saw any criminal action of any sort by the president of the united states. >> right. one would assume that is the case. i think the question will be whether or not there was anything in the testimony of don mcgahn, in conversations with special counsel that led them to overturn other stones that were not necessarily anything within the 30 hours. the other thing i would throw in here is, it remains to be seen

mr. manafort. >> how are you feeling going into this weekend? >> very good. 're very, very happy about the fair trial that judge ellis ensured for mr. manafort, and that's about it. thanks, guys. >> now, we don't know what's going to happen. but i got two people who have been through a lot of these types of federal trials. former federal prosecutors john flannery and seth waxman. i want to get into the deliberation room because it's fascinating and you know more than i do and most of us do. but let's start just with is it normal for a u.s. president to speak like this while a jury is deliberating about the defendant? >> no, it is not usual at all, but this president is not usual and doesn't care about the law or constitutional rights and doesn't care if he affects the outcome, which he plainly hopes to do. it's interesting -- >> why isn't it jury tampering? >> well, it is jury tampering. everything he does, practically, is obstruction, whether it's issuing statements that you will no longer have security clearances or he gives this speech. >> if judge ellis we

mr. mcgahn laid out how mr. trump tried to ensure control of the russia investigation. giving investigators a mix of information both potentially damaging and favorable to the president. mr. mcgahn cautioned to investigators that he never saw mr. trump go beyond his legal authorities, although the limits of executive power are somewhat americay. was it a mistake for trump to allow mcgahn to speak to mueller? depends who you ask. "the times" says mcgahn and his lawyer were, quote, stunned by that decision. quote, mcgahn's attorney, william burke, has explain head told white house advisers he did not appreciate the exposure and it was insane that mr. trump did not fight a mcgahn interview in court. but if you look at the president's tweets over the weekend, he says the reason he didn't fight the interview is simple. he has nothing to hide. and there's another part of this. "the times" says the president's legal team never got mcgahn's version of events ahead of time. so that's left them in a position where they believe that the white house counsel didn't put the president

provided new details about the alleged tape. >> when you listen to the parts you heard, how many times did you hear mr. trump, your former boss, how many times did you hear him use the "n" word? >> multiple times. what's upsetting is it was about someone who was on the cast with me. about kwame jackson. >> reporter: jackson is a businessman. he declined to comment saying taking a hard pass on all things omarosa. she also said there are more recorded tapes. >> i have plenty. >> reporter: even leaving a door open to the special counsel. >> anything mueller would like to see? >> if his office calls again, anything they want, i'll share. >> and kristen, one other thing the president has been tweeting a lot about omarosa. one thing he said was she was violating the terms of a nondisclosure agreement basically an agreement not to say bad things about the president. what do you know about that? >> reporter: well, that's right. take a look at that tweet. this came out on monday. he wrote, wacky omarosa already has a fully signed nondisclosure agreement. but in an interview on pbs news, she disputed that sayin

mr. cohen, how old are you, sir? the defendant, in four days i'll be 52. the judge, how far did you go in school? >> law. >> the judge. are you able to read, white, speak and understand english. >> the defendant, yes, your honor. >> the judge. are you now or have you recently been under the care of a doctor or psychiatrist? >> the defendant. no, your honor. court, have you ever been treated or hospitalized for any mental illness or hospitalized for any addiction? >> no. >> the judge, in the past 24 hours have you taken any drugs, medicine or pills or have you consumed any alcohol? yes, your honor. the judge, what have you taken or consumed, sir? >> last night at dinner, i had a glass of glenly vet 12 on the rocks. the judge, all right. is it your custom to do that? no, your honor. the judge, all right. have you had anything since that time? >> the defendant, no, your honor. is your mind clear today? yes. are you feeling all right? yes, sir. are you represented by counsel? >> i am. >> who are your attorneys? >> guy pet trillo and amy lester. >> mr. pet tril