this defiance for the rule of law not only internationally but even our own constitution i think mr pompei speech was a triumph of mr rection that it was especially old neo conservative wine poured into it america first rhetorical bottle it so it was woodrow wilson masquerading as pat buchanan i think will he or his speechwriter was trying to give the impression this is what mr trump promised in two thousand and sixteen what he's really giving us is what has been destroying america in the world for the last thirty years where we get to be the sovereign over the entire planet and tell everybody else to do but we don't we don't actually look out for our own narrow national interests i mean we can send troops illegally to syria but we can't send them to our own border to defend that good point daniel it's universal is ation of american law because i mean we have this situ a. with a chinese national that was detained in canada who. are we the chinese company here as we're sitting down here i read that a former canadian diplomat has been detained in china so now the the game begins here i don't

americana that's why i'm calling this program pax some american a two point zero because it seems like mr pompei you have some interesting ideas presenting it to the. international diplomats at the u.s. marshall fund i thought it was quite interesting their reaction it was really quite tepid it was kind of very quiet clapping here it just looks like unilateralism to me and i thought the u.s. created both lateral organizations after the second world war to create a more stable order it seems now get rid of the u.n. the walk away from the paris climate deal which i. i don't have a problem with the international court of justice. i could go on and on about all these relationships and agreements how does walking away from all of them and more make it safer for the world including the united states go ahead jim. well it doesn't make it safer and i think the problem is less unilateral unilateralist and per se but this defiance for the rule of law and not only internationally but even our own constitution i think mr pump speech was a triumph of mr rection that it was especially old neo conservative lin

this will ended war peter this is this is something that is extremely dangerous a one part of mr pompei oestrus speech really struck me when he talked about sovereignty for ourselves and for our friend france but that means i guess we have the unilateral right to say what other countries sovereignty should be a bridge not because they have violated any internationally agreed upon or binding rule but because we say so towards we we have a situation where we're not only one of the players on the international stage we also get to be the referee of the umpire and if need be the executioner and this cannot end well peter that we cannot continue to divide the world into satellites and vassals on the one side and enemies on the other side especially when we're lining up with not only iran but but but russia and china as potential enemies remember there was a recent report by a congressionally mandated commission saying that not only might there be a war with russia or china we could lose that war this the unthinkable for thirty years forty years during the old cold war has now become thinkabl

of jamal were still ongoing and washington would hold those responsible accountable for his death mr pompei as comments come hours before cia the cia director briefs house leaders on the saudi journalist murder meanwhile donald trump has reiterated his support for mohammed bin zalman as being very strongly in power. appears to have put one of the crown prince's projects in mohammed bin samana has reportedly suggested that foreign investors won't invest in the five hundred billion dollars development of neons city. is the financial times senior energy correspondent and one of the journalists who wrote the story she says many future mega projects could be in jeopardy. we were a lot of these projects these kind of big. announcements in saudi if they are going to cancel them they never quite say they're canceling them they just say that things are going to move a lot more slowly in fact we're just going to sort of shelve these projects and it seems like that's what's happening here i would say they're completely just canceling it but it does look that way the big neon project was one of the lan

not surprisingly not long after a leading democratic senator came on television to criticize what mr pompei o had to say first the secretary of state. the saudis have already paid the price there are the folks who actually committed the murder we've held accountable we will continue to do that no one underestimates how horrible this murder was but remember a iran is running rampant throughout the middle east the death of any one individual is awful the death of hundreds of thousands of people in europe or the middle east of the united states matters an awful lot president trump is committed to protecting america. secretary of state pump a zero discredits himself the state department and our nation with these statements i was one of the twelve senators of both political parties who were briefed by general hospital two weeks ago she of course heads up the central intelligence agency the same agency the secretary pump aoe used to be in charge of and it was clear within minutes of our briefing that this goes all the way to the top and to argue that the crown prince was not involved in this or a

secretary of state my comp aoe and literally moments ago terry tell us more about works of mr pompei i have to say. clearly what the secretary of state said is that within sixty days the u.s. is going to invoke the required six month period of waiting until their exit is considered final from the treaty at which point the i.n.f. treaty would be dead and the reason that the u.s. waited because they had actually planned i'm told by several sources to do it today to start the six month period today but european allies wanted more time they wanted to give russia one more chance they wanted to reach out again and and ask president putin if he would agree to destroy this missile system that all european allies believe is violating the i.n.f. treaty in order to preserve this this accord which is so important considered a cornerstone of european security so the u.s. has given the europeans and the russians sixty more days before that final period of six months starts but there's a lot of tension here and secretary general stoltenberg himself was very clearly concerned by these developments r

that he had been focusing on mr because shogi for a very long time it is zero chance zero that this happened in such an organized fashion without the crown prince as to pompei oh and madness i have great respect for them i would imagine if they were democratic in a democratic administration i would be all over them for being in the pocket of saudi arabia but since i have such respect for them i'm going to assume that they're being good soldiers and that when they look at the analysis they're being technical in their statement but they're not giving the assessment that i think the senate will have. i would really question somebody whose judgment if they could figure this out it is there to be figured out please let me finish and i think the reason they don't draw the conclusion that he's complicit discussed it ministration doesn't want to go down that road not because there's not evidence to suggest he's complicit if you don't let me bring on a statement ok next to me now i'm all due to anything i might do or to. try to get a sense of the senate resolution where we all vote and designate n.b.s. as one of the people responsible for the death of mr bush there