mr. gibner is there any additional public comment on item 1 seeing none, public comment is closed so first, i want to thank even that participate in making this project and moving forward happening i had an opportunity to go with mr. duffy and the gentleman to visit the site it seems like an exciting project to me and i hope it after it is mod it defines a permanent home it should be successful i hope it end up being a model for not only san francisco but another places we for too long we've had a disjoined approach to certain populations of homeless people and this seems like a pro tem way for them to bring everything together for certain populations that are very difficult to reach and to help in a systematic way it is exciting and i'm glad it's moving forward i discussed with mr. duffy and my predecessor, of course the importance of including the castro in the outreach to help the castro for the shambles the folks are not here as well as the other areas we have a population that needs the outreach and i think sometimes because of the very, very significant challenges in other parts of t

mr. gibner. >> deputy city attorney john gibner. the board it continue it but you have to keep it open to continue for three months so take the motion to continue the hearing open per a subsequent hearing at the continued date. >> okay. thank you. and supervisor campos. >> to clarify that that in fact the motion is predicated on the understanding that the hearing remains open to a later date. >> okay. with that mr. clerk can you please call the roll on the motion to continue. >> open to april 28, 2015. supervisor breed. >> aye. >> supervisor campos. >> aye. >> supervisor christensen. >> aye. >> supervisor cohen. >> aye. >> supervisor farrell. >> aye. >> supervisor kim. >> aye. >> supervisor mar. >> aye. >> supervisor tang. >> aye. >> supervisor wiener. >> aye. >> supervisor yee. >> aye. >> supervisor avalos. >> aye. >> there are 11 aye's. >> okay the continuance passes unanimously. thank you very much. and we also have our second 3:00 p.m. special order. and mr. clerk can you please call the items item 28, 29, 30. >> 27-30 comprise

mr. gibner. >>supervisor london breed: supervisor wiener has moved the amendment. can i have a second. seconded by supervisor mar. can we take that without objection? >> that passes. >> >>supervisor jane kim: i was excited that this worked it's way through the planning commission department that we are specifically defining homeless shelter and establishing it's zoning. i also want to recognize former supervisor duffy for bringing this to the attention of the planning department in working to clean up this language so that we can have it before the board and also for his work on the navigation center on 1950 mission as well. i think it is a great interim use of the site as we are in preconstruction design phase for the affordable family housing that will be built on this former sf sfusd parcel. i'm really looking forward to us offering really different services that are appropriate to our residents who don't have homes here in san francisco. our shelter system is pretty restricted in terms of people that it can take that live on our streets and do not have places to go to. i'm really e

mr. gibner. >> city attorney john gibner. the parties can probably speak to that best. my understanding there is a conference coming up in a month and a half and if there is no a settlement the trial maybe follow three months after that but they could probably speak best to the exact timing. >> okay. supervisor campos. >> so my inclination would be to continue this item and in light of the uncertainty of the schedule perhaps to do that for three months and see where the case is at that point, so that would be my suggestion in terms how we should approach this case. i want to of course give the parties an opportunity to comment on that. >> okay. so supervisor campos you're asking that we continue this item, and until that time a three month time period. do you want to specify a specific date? so it would be -- i don't know if there is a specific date for three months from today, and april that could work mr. clerk. >> april 28. >> april 28. >> okay. >> that would be my motion. >> okay. supervisor campos has made a motion to continue this hearing until april 28. is there

mr. malmet would be proposing non-substantive amendments to the resolution you don't know. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney i don't have them i can talk to malmet. >> they're not substantive it's clean up language so if we don't have it today, we can take it up with the full board. >> he said he was working he didn't have time to talk to me. >> and again, if we need to make them at the full board tomorrow that's fine. >> okay. thank you. >> thank you very much to the department we have benefiting from the illustrated of the arts. >> thank you, everyone thank you you know what makes a city great, of course, like san francisco is the land and the buildings and the way the city is laid out no street more important than market street and we looked at market street everyone knows about market street this is the specific spine of san francisco but what makes the city great is the people and our ability to work together the market light rail is an extraordinary example of a big community coming together many people consider on a possible challenging on this street that is 2.1 miles long in o

recommend option 4 this the john gibner, deputy city attorney are happy to walk through the logical challenges in options one through 3 if you want that discussion. >> thank you, mrupdike colleagues any questions at this point why not move to the budget analyst report. >> mr. chairman the purchase price of $15 million plus is part of the total of $165 million budget for the 1990 evans in package 4525 of our report the project will be fund by the earthquake you safety proceeds on page 268 of our report the proposed perspire price is for one million dollars $15,000 plus 2 percent more than the cb r e purchase prices of $11 million plus we also note on page 26 the negotiated purchase price of $179000 per square feet as shown on table 5 the average price per square feet is comparable which translated into 3 hundred plus for the 89 thousand square feet and the 1995 evans street if the lowest price at 6000 third street at one hundred plus per square feet the average price is one hundred and 64 thousand dollars at an estimated one million dollars plus for the 89 thousand plus at 1995 evans street the proposed million dollars purchase price would then be 8 hundred thousa