goldman of new york. >> thank you, mr. gomez. i want to return to the washington post october six article and i'd ask unanimous consent to enter it in the record. in your testimony, mr. mr. shapley before the ways and means committee, you stated there was a leak. it appeared to come from the agent level who was critical of the prosecutors for not charging the case. what you testified earlier was a little different. which one do you stand by today? >> i'm sorry, can you repeat that? >> it was a leak. it appeared to come from the agents level who was critical of the prosecutors for not charging the case. >> yes. it appeared because i said it came from the agent level, but the source was a source familiar with the topic and it's not say it was a law enforcement source. >> okay. that seems to be a distinction without a difference. and you understand that, obviously, makes a grand jury investigation is a felony, right? >> making investigative information including 61 at three would be a felony. >> that's true as well. would you agree t

mr. gomez. so people who believe in this recycling we give them the traceability information from government to the way smoking that is being picked up. so any consumer will buy is overcoming, there's a few articles which he can scan. and he will know from way of the waste was collected for his particular government. in india, the big sign industrial guns when nearly 5 percent of the companies g d p. it is also one of the most polluting industries. fortunately, the sustainable fashion market in the country is set to go at 11 percent to reach 10000000 used by 20. 25. is just a reminder, the top is a story that we're following for you. this our new york and central bank as 5. just keep interest rates for the 10 consecutive time in a row and ask us at 4 percent. you see the president christine, my god point is to persist in the high inflation. yours and as a basis for the decision may have comes and maybe we can. i can always germany's trade in goods with india is searching ahead. official gems, th

mr. gomez? mr. gomez votes no ms. stansberry. ms. stansberry both no. mr. garcia. mr. garcia votes no. mr. frost. mr. frost votes no. ms. lee votes no. mr. kosar votes no. ms. crockett. ms. crockett votes no. mr. goldman. mr. moscowitz. mr. moscowitz both no. ms. tlaib votes no. mr. chairman. mr. chairman votes aye. mr. fallon is not yet recorded. >> aye . >> that was mr. langworthy of new york recorded. mr. fallon votes i. mr. langworthy votes aye. >> mr. timmons is not yet recorded. mr. timmons votes aye. >> mr. kosar is not recorded. mr. kosar votes i -- eye. >> mr. connolly votes no. not yet recorded for krishnamoorthi . mr. krishnamoorthi votes no . >> how was mr. armstrong recorded? >> mr. armstrong is loaded aye. >> mr. chairman, however my recorded? >> ms. mace is reported as a voting aye. >> mr. donald's is not yet recorded. mr. donald's votes yes. >> have i been recorded, madam clerk? it is mr. raskin. >> mr. raskin, you are reported as voting no. >> mr. gomez, you are recorded as voted no. >> how on my recorded. >> ms. cortez is reported as voting no. ms. br

mr. gomez? mr. gomez votes no ms. stansberry. ms. stansberry both no. mr. garcia. mr. garcia votes no. mr. frost. mr. frost votes no. ms. lee votes no. mr. kosar votes no. ms. crockett. ms. crockett votes no. mr. goldman. mr. moscowitz. mr. moscowitz both no. ms. tlaib votes no. mr. chairman. mr. chairman votes aye. mr. fallon is not yet recorded. >> aye . >> that was mr. langworthy of new york recorded. mr. fallon votes i. mr. langworthy votes aye. >> mr. timmons is not yet recorded. mr. timmons votes aye. >> mr. kosar is not recorded. mr. kosar votes i -- eye. >> mr. connolly votes no. not yet recorded for krishnamoorthi . mr. krishnamoorthi votes no . >> how was mr. armstrong recorded? >> mr. armstrong is loaded aye. >> mr. chairman, however my recorded? >> ms. mace is reported as a voting aye. >> mr. donald's is not yet recorded. mr. donald's votes yes. >> have i been recorded, madam clerk? it is mr. raskin. >> mr. raskin, you are reported as voting no. >> mr. gomez, you are recorded as voted no. >> how on my recorded. >> ms. cortez is reported as voting no. ms. br

mr. gomez, the russian government basically said to, that's no surprise to us. you've been part of the western world for a long time. glad to hide your into. so still, if we not, and you know to, we got the had, i was a week response is full. so people, because it was a major strategic the fee for russia. and i didn't want to admit that it's the old stuff to you. i just need to know it's a military parade in moscow. on may, 9th, 2023, march the 78th anniversary of the soviet victory over nazi germany. the, the criminal itself has broad nato, even closer to russia's borders with this war against ukraine, the. and yet people in russia don't see this as a defeat. as russian foreign ministers sergey lab. ralph made clear of the united nations on april 25th 2023. they just said to him so that i see a but that was but of the thirty's, little shooting. you're not that little you unable score to the claim is that rush to try to prevent nato expansion. well, no, that's how they see it. from there, i re tower we to have our ivory towers. and the conclusions of unbiased ob

thank you >> mr. gomez, the gentleman, i want to return to the washington post october 6th article. i would ask unanimous consent to enter it in the record. and your testimony, mr. shabbily, before the ways and means committee, you stated, quote, there was a leak. it appeared to come from the agents level who was critical of the prosecutors for not charging the case. what you testified earlier was different. which one do you stand by today? >> i'm sorry, can you repeat that. there was a leak and appeared to come from the agents level who was critical of the prosecutors for not to charging the case. >> it appears because it came from the agent level. the source was a source familiar with the topic. >> okay, it seems to be a distinction. and then you understand that obviously the grandeur 80 information is a felony, right? >> and best a gate of information and how multi would be a felony. >> so, would you agree that there would be some skepticism from any prosecutors about which of the agents may be the source of the leak? >> the time has retired, be feel free to answer the question. >

with >> mr. gomez from california. >> mr. chairman, what obstruction were you referring to? >> miss stansberry from new mexico. >> thank you mr. chairman, and thank you to mr. donald trump for calling this hearing today. as it demonstrates, the house gop and donald trump's continued attacks on our institutions and on our democracy and the house gop's complete inability to govern in a serious manner. as they are holding this hearing as we see just two days before a potential devastating government shutdown, and the fact most republican members on the committee didn't even bother to show up for the hearing this morning. their own star witness said right here in this committee this morning that he doesn't even believe that there's enough evidence to meet the standards needed for impeachment. and in doing this, our colleagues across the aisle are making a mockery of this institution and of our constitution, conspiracy theories, peddling the theories that rudy giuliani and donald trump themselves tried to get the american people to believe and which donald trump's doj debunked. i

. >> chair recognizes mr. gomez from california for five minutes. >> all right, thank you so much, mr. chairman. so, one of the things i want to kind of stress is that from the very beginning of this congress, the republicans had one thing in mind. let's get joe biden, right. let's get joe biden and let's take, you know, find the evidence that showed he did something wrong. but when the evidence didn't exist, they would make up facts or they would exaggerate to an extent that it was like honestly mind boggling. and i know, i want to focus on one part first. the republicans keep pointing out 20 shell companies of the biden family. these are actually 20 shell companies of hunter biden. so any time they say the biden family, they are really saying hunter biden. because there hasn't been a connection between joe biden and these companies. to an extent, do we have the slides up? first slide is, that's not the slide, but i'll show it. so there's an article from "washington post" august 17, 2023, says how republicans overh

>> your star witness. >> the chair recognizes mr. gÓmezom california for five minutes. >> all right, thank you so much, mr. chairman. so one of the things that i want to stress is from the very beginning of this congress the republicans had one thing in mind, let's get joe biden. let's get joe biden and let's take, you know, find the evidence that showed he did something wrong. so when the evidence didn't exist, they would make up facts or they would exaggerate to an extent that it was like honestly mindboggling. and i know -- i want to focus on one part first. the republicans keep pointing out 20 shell companies of the biden family. these are actually 20 shell companies of hunter biden. okay. so any time they say the biden family, they are really saying hunter biden because there hasn't been a connection between joe biden and these companies to an extent do we have the slides up? first slide -- that's not the slide but i will show it. so there's an article from washington post august 17, 2023 and itt says how republicans oversight finding

. >> that chernow recognizes mr. gomez for five minutes. >> sorry. >> garcia for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. let's zero in on the bottom line. what we have is two irs investigators who clearly work very hard on the hunter biden investigation. thank you both for being here today. you both gave recommendations to prosecutors based on your work and then donald trump hand- picked a prosecutor and made recommendations to charge hunter. he acted independently and he himself has confirmed that. you did your job making recommendations and the prosecutor did his job. you don't have to agree with the conclusion but that is the bottom line that we have today. today's hearing is like most of the majority's investigation of hearings. a lot of allegations, zero proof, no receipts but apparently -- at a certain point, american people need actual evidence, actual evidence but we have seen absolutely none. let's go back and review what has gone over the course of the last seven months of this smear campaign against the white

. >> the chair recognizes mr. gomez. >> thank you so much. i want to be clear that whistleblower allegations should be taken seriously. i had a whistleblower approach my office during my first term but one of the things i learned from that is there is a clear fact based process that needs to be followed to make sure the whistleblower investigation is executed properly without political interference and this is not what is happening here today. where this originated in ways and means, republicans through that process into the governor -- better. there are more than 50 people identified in the committee on the same topic that once spoken to and not interviewed before the republican majority released these allegations to the public and they didn't take the time to check their fact. and republicans even admitted during questioning that they never interviewed or asked questions or sought to ask questions of these individuals. instead, they cherry picked 13 people whom they knew agreed to corroborate their claims and why wouldn't they conduct a tho

mr. exercise this. yes, i am sure the lexia will have fran gomez for exercises rustic try and then of career. it's a new blog and you kind before the onset, which is now full. and of course, it's a, 1st of all, it's not against you, but it says, it says it's a little fresh on japan and united states. it's all this soviet, but russia has previously supported international sanctions against north korea, 4th unlawful nuclear weapons program. do i hear you correctly? are you saying that that does not mean anything to russia anymore? yes, you're correct, russell. forget about this. isn't this a dangerous game that putting this play? it's a, it's a you're talking good. talking about the, the d. stabilisation of, of the nuclear balance in asia and beyond the yes that was released because uh again the currently there i knew his father, i knew his grandfather came, is in such a way he's, i'm predictable, but at the same time, no rush. i have some pools boyfriend, some kids of course the that is adventure as a venture of the nuclear war on korean peninsula. so it's, it's rarely, it's rare to see which

how you show that you go home frontier does not. gomez regularly visits, mrs. bows, home and headquarters to collect the funds necessary for buying back, plundered chinese works that are sold in europe. i am 40 now working in shy nice and sometimes i am just to touch on wednesdays of ways choking off. could you read it really varies. no. be you enough. china is that only one voice. it's a natural. naturally it belongs to our nation. everybody seems the same since, you know, he's very friends on our countries. and i'm a taken to hook up the german soldiers of uh your time that you can squeeze the central watch. it off. pressure was the other day she had to hit the bush with 2 or 3 of the bush with you did furniture for me solution how k 20, the chevy. do you have a total or shut down by the phone as to what the charges you saw in the past? off? can you go see my social crate? so to answer the phone. sure. she's a good. well, we agree to do for you to help it shows that in our washer it should say it's or me or she said so which it, she a job that you know, the message doesn't close in the

mr. cruz: i rise to speak about anna gomez. if confirmed, she would give the democrats a majority at the fcc that would enable them to impose a radical left-wing agenda, including investment killing and job killing so-called net neutrality rules, otherwise known as obamacare for the internet. i strongly oppose her nomination and encourage my nominees to do the same. the fcc exercises vast power over how americans communicate. it has a history of vague statutory provisions to pursue partisan policy goals. the fcc could go down ar dark path of censoring speech and engaging in regulatory overreach. under current rosen worcehl's leadership that is not hypothetical. the fcc has engaged in unprecedented abuses of power, such as the multibillion-dollar techni transaction, attempting to expand the service fund spending in defiance of clear statutory limits and holding valuable giga hertz licenses hostage. even more alarming, the fcc is retaining requests by radical left-wing groups to revoke a broadcast station's license for alleged, q

mr. exercises. yes, i am sure. the lexia will have fran gomez for exercises rustic, try and then of career. it's a new blog and you kind before the onset, which is now full. and of course, it's a 1st of all, it's not against you. but it says, it says it's a little fresh on japan and united states. it's all this soviet but russia has previously supported international sanctions against north korea, 4th unlawful nuclear weapons program. do i hear you correctly? are you saying that that does not mean anything to russia anymore? yes, you're correct, russell. forget about this. isn't this a dangerous game that putting display? it's a, it's a you're talking good. talking about the destabilization of of the nuclear balance in asia and beyond. the yes. that was the least because i came the currently that i knew his father. i use his grandfather came in so some way he's i'm predictable, but at the same time, no rush, i have some tools going thing. some can of course the that is event as a venture of the nuclear war on korean peninsula. so it's, it's really, it's rare to see which is, which was a rar

mr. garland, i believe that the only thing the cartel leaders fear is the united states prison. i want to thank you for the good job you recently extradited oviedo gomez lopez chapel center thank you for the good job. my question is, do you have plans to extradite additional cartel leaders from other parts of the world to the united states to face u.s. justice in the u.s.get into that discussion, diplomatic discussions over the matter, but obviously we have indicted the othe pitot being the nickname given to the sons of l chapel. >> any of those? how many are there? >> can't remember. maybe four more. maybe five. i'm not too sure exactly. they've been publicly indicted and of course we will seek the extradition and the upper tension of everyone we've indicted. >> the apprehension and indictment of these individuals requires that you have cooperationur office to bring these cartel leaders to justice? >> they've obviously worked with us with respect to oviedo. is definition by the mexicans led to the deaths of a significant number of mexican marines. ovi does people fighting back with 50 caliber machine guns and the marines having to use blackhawk attac

mr. garland, i believe that the only thing the cartel leaders fear is the united states prison. i want to thank you for the good job you recently extradited oviedo gomez lopez chapel center thank you for the good job. my question is, do you have plans to extradite additional cartel leaders from other parts of the world to the united states to face u.s. justice in the u.s. prison sentence? >> i don't want to get into that discussion, diplomatic discussions over the matter, but obviously we have indicted the other two pitot's. two pitot being the nickname given to the sons of l chapel. >> any of those? how many are there? >> can't remember. maybe four more. maybe five. i'm not too sure exactly. they've been publicly indicted and of course we will seek the extradition and the upper tension of everyone we've indicted. >> the apprehension and indictment of these individuals requires that you have cooperation from foreign countries, especially mexico since that's where a lot of these cartels are operating. when you say right now mexico is cooperating with us in terms of working with your office to bring these cartel leaders to justice? >> they've obviously